2016 talks at Academia Sinica, National Taiwan University, National Tsing-Hua University, National Central University

1. Putting the latest Computer Vision and
Deep Learning algorithms to work
The Opportunities and Challenges
Albert Y. C. Chen, Ph.D.
Vice President, R&D
Viscovery

2. Albert Y. C. Chen, Ph.D.
• Experience
2017-present: Vice President of R&D at Viscovery
2016-2017: Chief Scientist at Viscovery
2015: Principal Scientist @ Nervve Technologies
2013-2014 Computer Vision Scientist @ Tandent Vision
2011-2012 @ GE Global Research
• Education
Ph.D. in Computer Science, SUNY-Buffalo
M.S. in Computer Science, NTNU
B.S. in Computer Science, NTHU
• Some random things about me…
SUNY Excellence in Teaching Award, 2010.
Some rapid promotions, some failed startups, some
patents, some papers…

3. 1. W.Wu,A.Y. C. Chen, L. Zhao, and J. J. Corso. Brain tumor detection and segmentation in a CRF framework with pixel-wise
affinity and superpixel-level features. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2015.
2. S. N. Lim,A.Y. C. Chen and X.Yang. Parameter Inference Engine (PIE) on the Pareto Front. In Proceedings of International
Conference of Machine Learning,Auto ML Workshop, 2014.
3. A.Y. C. Chen, S.Whitt, C. Xu, and J. J. Corso. Hierarchical supervoxel fusion for robust pixel label propagation in videos. In
Submission to ACM Multimedia, 2013.
4. A.Y.C. Chen and J.J. Corso.Temporally consistent multi-class video-object segmentation with the video graph-shifts
algorithm. In Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Applications of ComputerVision, 2011.
5. D.R. Schlegel,A.Y.C. Chen, C. Xiong, J.A. Delmerico, and J.J. Corso. Airtouch: Interacting with computer systems at a
distance. In Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Applications of ComputerVision, 2011.
6. A.Y.C. Chen and J.J. Corso. On the effects of normalization in adaptive MRF Hierarchies. In Proceedings of International
Symposium CompIMAGE, 2010.
7. A.Y.C. Chen and J.J. Corso. Propagating multi-class pixel labels throughout video frames. In Proceedings of IEEE Western
NewYork Image Processing Workshop, 2010.
8. A.Y. C. Chen and J. J. Corso. On the effects of normalization in adaptive MRF Hierarchies. Computational Modeling of
Objects Represented in Images, pages 275–286, 2010.
9. Y.Tao, L. Lu, M. Dewan,A.Y. C. Chen, J. J. Corso, J. Xuan, M. Salganicoff, and A. Krishnan. Multi-level ground glass nodule
detection and segmentation in ct lung images. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2009.
10. A.Y.C. Chen, J.J. Corso, and L.Wang. Hops: Efficient region labeling using higher order proxy neighborhoods. In
Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2008.

4. Some work done before I
caught the startup fever
Freestyle Sketching Stage
AirTouch waits in background
for the initialization signal
Initialize
Terminate
Output
image
database
Start:
Results
CBIR
query
Airtouch HCI interface for Content-based Image Retrieval

5. Interactive Segmentation & Classification
• Segmentation then classification:
• computationally more efficient,
• results in much higher classification accuracy.
• Pioneered the “pixel label propagation” field.
• First to utilize superpixels and supervoxels for the task.
FG
Traditional Spatial
Propagation
Pixel label map
Label a subset of pixels
BG
Spatio-temporal Propagation
time

6. Image/Video Object Recognition
and Content Understanding
approaches
person carries
gives
recieves
Ontology
object
Person 1
Person 1Person 2
High-Level
Mid-Level
approach
activity
receives gives
carries
activity
activity activity
Time
Reasoning
x
x
x
Low-Level
x x
x
x

7. Learning and Adapting Optimal
Classifier Parameters
subspace B
subspace
A
subspace
C
Image-level feature space
priors
Patch-level feature space
posterior
probability
suggest optimal
parameter configuration

8. Graphical Models and
Stochastic Optimization
A
(a) The space-time volume of a
video showing the objects
(A--F) and their appearing
time-span.
space
time
A
B
C
D
E
F
B E
F
C
D
(b) The temporal relationship
graph. An edge between
two vertices mean that the
two objects overlap in time.
(c) The goal is: cover all objects
with the smallest number of
"ground truth key frames".
space
time
A
B
C
D
E
F
key 1 key 2
A
B E
F
C
D
(d) This translates to: iteratively
solving the max clique
problem until all vertices
belong to a clique.
A
B E
F
C
D
key 2
key 1
frame t-1 frame t
layer n layer n
layer n+1 layer n+1
Temporal
Shift
Shift
µ

9. Medical Imaging and
Geospatial Imaging
GNN detection and
segmentation
in Lung CT geospatial imaging:
building detection
Brain tumor detection and
segmentation in MR images.

10. Why Risk to Innovate?
• Good business model NEVER last forever.
• Average “shelf life” on S&P 500: 20 years.
• 100-year old companies constantly reinvent
themselves every 10-20 years
• Startups contribute to 20% of USA’s GDP.

11. The Death of a Good
Business Model
• Foxconn 20 year revenue v.s. net profit (now at 5%)

12. What do 100 year old
corporations do?
GE Schenectady, 1896

13. History of change at GE
• 1886: one of the 12 original companies on the Dow
Jone Industrial Average (also the only one remaining).
• 1889: lightbulbs
• 1919: radios
• 1927: TV
• 1941: jet engine
• 1960: nuclear power
• 1971: room AC units
• 1995: MRI

14. History of change at IBM
• 1960s: mainframe computer
• 1980s: personal computer
• 2000s: integrated solutions
• 2020s: AI, Watson

15. How about the leading
Semiconductor companies?

16. NVidia reinventing itself
—2 times in 20 years

17. “Bad money drives out good”
in the desktop GPU market

18. The rise of mobile computing,
and how NVidia missed the boat!

19. NVidia’s Tegra mobile
processors never took off
then, the market
saturated…

20. NVidia not just survived.
NVidia is thriving!

21. Meet the new NVidia: Deep Learning,
Deep Learning, and still, Deep Learning

23. The king is dead,
long live the king!

24. Now, again, do we want to
do OEM/ODM forever?
Optimizing an old business model
is just delaying its eventual death.

25. Startups
• A company, partnership, or temporary
organization designed to search for a new,
repeatable and scalable business model.

26. Your Idea
• Are you passionate about it?
• Is it disruptive enough?
• What is your business plan?
• What is it?
• Can it make money?
• What is the future of the idea?
• What is your competitive advantage?
• How do you build up your entry barrier?

27. A minimal startup team
• A hacker
• A hustler
• A hipster

29. Startup Timeline

30. Prototype
• Hack out a prototype
• Spend 2-10 weeks max.
• Investors are much more likely to fund you if
you have a minimal initial version of your idea.
• Hackathons are a good place to start.
• Iteratively improve the prototype

31. Money!

33. Buildup your entry barrier!
• Market (users)
• Speed
• Team
• Technology

34. Building entry barrier with Technology!!

35. Computer Vision, it can’t be
that hard, right?

36. Brief History
Marvin Minsky
“In 1966, Minsky hired a first-year undergraduate
student and assigned him a problem to solve over the
summer: connect a television camera to a computer
and get the machine to describe what it sees.”
Gerald Sussman
The student never worked on
Computer Vision problems again.

37. Brief History
• 1960’s: interpretation of synthetic worlds
• 1970’s: some progress on interpreting selected images
• 1980’s: ANNs come and go; shift toward geometry and increased
mathematical rigor
• 1990’s: face recognition; statistical analysis in vogue
• 2000’s: broader recognition; large annotated datasets available; video
processing starts
Guzman ‘68 Ohta Kanade ‘78 Turk and Pentland ‘91

38. What’s in our arsenal?
• Image filters
• Feature descriptors
• Classifiers

39. Filters: blurring

40. Filters: sharpen

41. Filters: edge

42. Filters: straight lines

43. Features:

44. Features: Harris Corners

45. Features: Laplacian of Gaussian
(LoG; scale detection)

46. Features: Orientation
How to compute the rotation?
Create edge orientation
histogram and find peak.

47. Features: SIFT

48. Features: SIFT

49. Features: Gabor

50. Classifiers: SVM

51. Classifiers: Ensemble

52. Classifiers: Random Fields

53. Classifiers: Deformable Parts
Model (DPM)

54. Classifiers: Deep Neural Network

55. What alg. should I use then?
• How much data do we have?
• What objects are we trying to detect?
• For example, Google’s DNN trained with 11k images
over 20 classes in 2013 doesn’t always beat DPM.
0
0.15
0.3
0.45
0.6
aero bike bird boat bottle bus car cat chair cow
0
0.15
0.3
0.45
0.6
dog horse m-bike person plant sheep sofa table train TV
D
N
N
D
P
M

56. ML alg. and their Applications
• Deep
Learning
• Markovian/
Bayesian
• Feature
Matching
• Other ML
methods

57. Meta-Learning
• Different use
cases calls for
different ML
algorithms.
• Meta-Learning:
learning how to
learn.
• Requires plenty of
domain-specific
know-how.

58. Maturing Computer Vision
Applications

59. • Final inspection cells
• Robot guidance and
checking orientation of
components
• Packaging Inspection
• Medical vial inspection
• Food pack checks
• Verifying engineered
components[5]
• Wafer Dicing
• Reading of Serial
Numbers
• Inspection of Saw
Blades
• Inspection of Ball Grid
Arrays (BGAs)
• Surface Inspection
• Measuring of Spark
Plugs
• Molding Flash Detection
• Inspection of Punched
Sheets
• 3D Plane
Reconstruction with
Stereo
• Pose Verification of
Resistors
• Classification of Non-
Woven Fabrics
1970s-now: Machine Vision
for Industrial Inspection
• Automated Train
Examiner (ATEx)
Systems
• Automatic PCB
inspection
• Wood quality
inspection
• Final inspection of
sub-assemblies
• Engine part inspection
• Label inspection on
products
• Checking medical
devices for defects

60. Industrial Inspection: turbofan
jet engine blade maintenance
• Some seemingly daunting
machine vision tasks actually
works with relatively simple
image processing algorithms.

61. Industrial Inspection: Cognex Omniview

62. Industrial Inspection: Cognex Omniview

63. License Plate Recognition
(1979-now)

64. License Plate Readers with Text
Detection and Neural Networks

65. Biometrics

66. Automated Fingerprint
Identification (1970s-now)

67. Face Recognition
(1990s-now)
• Face Detection (Viola and Jones, 2001)
• Face Verification (1:1) v.s. Identification (1:N)

68. Face Verification and Identification,
Labeled Faces in the Wild (LFW)
Recognition
Accuracy:
• 1 to 1: 99%+
• 1 to 100: 90%
• 1 to 10,000:
50%-70%.
• 1 to 1M: 30%.
LFW dataset, common FN↑, FP↓

70. Sports—NFL first down line
(1995-now)

71. Sports—NFL first down line
minus
equals

72. 3D Reconstruction
(As old as CV; became
practical since SIFT)

73. 3D Reconstruction with Feature
Matching, Structure from Motion

74. 3D Reconstruction with Feature
Matching, Structure from Motion

75. Image Panoramas
(1980s - now)

76. Solving Panorama Problem
with Markov Random Fields
Input:

77. Solving Panorama Problem
with Markov Random Fields
Input:

78. Solving Panorama Problem
with Markov Random Fields
Input:

79. Solving Panorama Problem
with Markov Random Fields
Input:

80. Solving Panorama Problem
with Markov Random Fields
Input:

81. Solving Panorama Problem
with Markov Random Fields
Input:

82. Solving Panorama Problem
with Markov Random Fields
Input:

83. Solving Panorama Problem
with Markov Random Fields

84. Solving Panorama Problem
with Markov Random Fields
ICM (Iterated Conditional Modes), 1986

85. Solving Panorama Problem
with Markov Random Fields
Belief Propagation (1980-2000)

86. Solving Panorama Problem
with Markov Random Fields
Graph-Cuts (alpha expansion), 2001

87. Photosynthesis

88. Solving Photosynthesis Problems
with Alpha-matting (2000s-now)

89. Object Detection & Classification
state-of-the-art
• ImageNet Large Scale Visual
Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC)
• 1000+ classes, 1.2M images.
0
0.125
0.25
0.375
0.5
11 12 13 14 11 12 13 14
classification
error
classification
+localization error

90. Image Scene Classification
• MIT Places 401
dataset.
• top-5 accuracy
rates >80%.

91. Self-driving cars (2000s-now)

92. DARPA Grand Challenge
(2005)

93. 2005 winner, Stanley (Stanford),
3mph through desert

95. DARPA Urban Challenge
(2007)

96. 2007 winner, Boss (CMU),
13mpg through the city

97. Self Driving Cadillac, US
congressman to airport, 2013

98. Google Self Driving Car,
2015

99. Google Self-Driving Car,
2016

100. Google Self-Driving Car, 2016

101. NVidia Self Driving Car, 2016

102. How did we come this far?
Race car drivers know the trick

103. Focus on Free Space /
Drivable Area, not Obstacles!

104. Up-and-coming
Computer Vision
Applications

105. Structure from X, Floored

106. Structure from X, PIX4D

107. Object Recognition
Blue River Technology

108. Augmented Reality
Magic Leap

109. IMRSV

110. Retail Insights
Source:
Prism Skylabs

111. Other Applications in
Business Intelligence
• Measure brand exposure.
• Measure sponsorship effectiveness.
• Loss prevention and retail layout optimization.

112. How about Smart
Surveillance?

113. Angel.co

114. My humble attempts at
putting the latest Computer
Vision algorithms to work

115. Intrinsic Imaging at Tandent
Vision Science
Computer Vision would be half-solved without shadows!
LightOriginal Image Surface

116. Tandent Lightbrush
Video Tutorial for Tandent Lightbrush: https://vimeo.com/47009123

118. Issues
• Highly anticipated, highly acclaimed, but small
crowd at $500 a license.
• Adobe Photoshop monopoly and the “not
invented here” syndrome.
• Adobe’s arch-rival, Corel (Corel Draw, Paint
Shop Pro, Ulead PhotoImpact) was DYING and
asked too much from the botched deal.

119. Have fun scribbling out your
shadows in photoshop!
Poor Bob from Adobe wasted 9 minutes removing just 1 shadow

120. Intrinsic Imaging for improving the
RGB signal in autonomous driving

121. Intrinsic Imaging’s other
applications

122. Retrospect
• 20 researchers burned 25 million in 8 years;
investors got 50 patents in return, period.
• Overestimated the total addressable market
size, in a market with existing monopoly.
• Many missed opportunities. Counterexample of
the lean startup model.

123. Some SfM, SLAM startups

124. Satellite/Aerial Imagery Analysis
• 40cm resolution at 30fps for 90 sec for any location on earth.
• One LEO satellite revisits any place on Earth every 3 days.
• Need 24 satellites to revisit any place on Earth every 3 hours.

125. Challenges for Single satellite depth
estimation and 3D reconstruction
• At 30fps, a LEO satellite
travels 250m between two
consecutive frames —>
theoretically sufficient for
cm-level depth estimation.
• Sources of Noise:
• Camera distortions
• Atmospheric Disturbance
• Ground vegetation
• Sub-pixel sampling noise
1
2

126. What happened?
• B2B customers takes too long to strike deals.
• Google ate us alive in just 3 months, while we
were still pitching for VC-funding with our
prototype.

127. Visual Search at Nervve

128. Retrospect
• Growth pains expanding from intelligence
community clients to advertisement clients.
• Forming the right team of engineers and
researchers and moving at the right pace.
• For any Computer Vision/Machine Learning
company:
• Researchers that cannot program—> OUT
• Engineers that don’t know math —> OUT

129. Visual Search, Simply Smarter

130. Once in a lifetime opportunity in
China’s video streaming market

131. What do we need?
Face Motion
Image
scene Text Audio Object
Semantics

132. Viscovery VDS (Video Discovery Service)

133. Viscovery VDS (Video Discovery Service)

134. Viscovery VDS (Video Discovery Service)

135. Challenges Encountered
Along the Way
• From Product Recognition in Images, to Face,
Logo, Object, Scene recognition in Videos.
• Number of Categories
• Recognition Accuracy
• Recognition Speed
• System Architecture
• Business Model

136. Viscovery’s Edge
• Market: first mover’s advantage in China’s video
streaming market.
• Speed: we built the whole VDS thing in a few months!
• Team: You! Seriously!
• Technology:
• Depth
• Breadth
• Cloud
• Customizability
• Self-Learning

137. Life is not all rosy at startups
• High Risk, High Pressure, High Uncertainty!
• Resources are scarce, but you MUST DELIVER!
• Forming your all-star team is not that easy…
• Focus, and persistence.

138. What can Taiwan’s academia
do to help bridge the gap?
HMM….

139. Academia
IndustryGeneral Public
reputation and
policy support
improved
living standards
students
opportunity
well-trained
graduates
grants and
collaborations
A healthy cycle

140. Academia
IndustryGeneral Public
unsupportive
policies
stagnant wages
useless
education
unemployable
graduates
A vicious cycle
no grants
no students

141. Where should we start?
Maybe with a few more stories.

142. Where should we start?
Maybe with a few more stories.

143. Where should we start?
Maybe with a few more stories.

144. The Goldilocks zone of innovation

145. The Goldilocks zone of innovation
Business
Relevance
Academic
Relevance
plentiful resources; hierarchical organization
lack of resources; responsive organization
traditional corporations
talking “innovation”
corporate research
startups struggling to survive
academic spinoffs
MSR

146. Thank You!
albert@viscovery.com