SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 139
Dr. Aliaa Omar EL-Hady
MD. Physical medicine, Rheum. & Rehabilitation
• Ancient Egyptians used 1st
splints ~ 5.000 ys ago, not to
stabilize joints or body parts.
• Middle Ages armorers
manufactured splints that
protected as well as stabilized
the body.
• French surgeon, Ambroise
Pare` developed metal corsets
in the late 16th century
HISTORY
• Lorenz Heister is credited with
developing 1st spinal orthosis in
the late 17th century. It was
quite similar to the modern day
Halo brace.
• The basic principles of spinal
immobilization have actually
changed little in the past 300
years, however the materials
used and combination of surgery
and bracing has changed
tremendously.
HISTORY
SPINE BIOMECHANICS
• Three flexible curves of
vertebral column (cervical,
thoracic & lumbar)
• Transfers load from head &
trunk to pelvis.
• Protects spinal cord.
• Permits motion in three
planes.
• Vertebral bodies progressively
larger in size caudally to
sustain increasing
superimposed weight.
• Intrinsic Stability: Intervertbral disc + surrounding
ligaments.
• Extrinsic Stability: muscles
•Intervertbral discs bears & distributes loads &
restrains excessive motion.
•Intradiscal pressure is 1.5 times of external load
in compression.
S P I N A L M O T I O N
Characteristics of spinal orthosis:
 Weight of the orthosis
 Adjustability
 Functional use
 Cosmesis
 Cost
 Durability
 Material
 Ability to fit various sizes of patients
 Ease of putting on (donning) and taking off
(doffing)
 Access to tracheostomy site, peg tube, or
other drains
 Access to surgical sites for wound care
 Aeration to avoid skin maceration from
moisture
Indications of spinal orthosis:
Pain relief
Mechanical unloading
Scoliosis management
Spinal immobilization after surgery
Spinal immobilization after traumatic
injury
Compression fracture management
Kinesthetic reminder to avoid certain
movements
The biomechanical principles of orthotic
design include :
 balance of horizontal forces.
 fluid compression.
 distraction.
 construction of a cage around the patient.
 skeletal fixation.
In general, structural damage to posterior
elements of the spine creates more instability
with flexion, whereas damage to anterior
elements creates more instability with
extension.
Construction of a cage around the
patient leads to:
 Balance of horizontal forces
 Increase intra-abdominal pressure
 Relieve load on vertebrae
 Prevention of certain movements
 Stability
Duration of use of spinal orthosis:
 Pain: 1-2 weeks.
 Instability: till the patient can
tolerate discomfort.
 Post surgical: after acute fractures
6-12 weeks
 Gradual removal + static EX
Complications of spinal orthosis:
 Discomfort & local pain
 Osteopenia
 Skin breakdown
 Nerve compression
 Ingrown facial hair for men
 Muscle atrophy with prolonged use
 Decreased pulmonary capacity
 Increased energy expenditure with ambulation
 Difficulty donning and doffing orthosis
 Difficulty with transfers
 Psychological and physical dependency
 Increased segmental motion at ends of the
orthosis
 Unsightly appearance
 Poor patient compliance
Success of spinal orthosis:
 Decreased pain
 Increased strength
 Improved function
 Increased proprioception
 Improved posture
 Correction of spinal curve deformity
 Protection against spinal instability
 Minimized complications
 Healing of ligaments and bones
CLASSIFICATION
According To Region Crossed
• Crevical (CO )
• Head Cervical Orthoses (HCO)
• Cervicothoracic Orthoses (CTO)
• Halo Device
• Thoracolumbar Orthoses (TLO)
• Lumbosacral Orthoses (LSO)
• Thoracolumbosacral orthosis ( TLSO)
CLASSIFICATION
According To Motion Restriction
• Flexion- Extension FE control
• Flexion- Extension- Rotation FER Control
• Flexion- Extension- Lateral bending-
Rotation- FELR Control
CLASSIFICATION
According To Materials Used
• Rigid
• Flexible
Cervical Orthosis
F-E
• Soft (zimmer)
• Hard (semi-rigid): moulded
• a. Thomas
• b. Philadelphia
• c. Aspen
• d. Miami
• Collars for weak neck extensors: Head master &
Executive
F-E-R • SOMI
F-E-L-R
• 1- Poster
• 2- Custom
• Minerva
• Cuirass
• 3- Yale
• 4- Halo vest
CERVICAL ORTHOSES (COLLARS)
Flexible Soft Collar
• Made from soft foam.
• Provide mechanical restraint (5-15%)
• Psychologic comfort.
• Head support when acute neck pain occurs.
• Relief from minor muscle spasm.
• Relief from cervical strain.
Soft cervical collar:
Polyethylene or foam
 Least limitation of cervical motion.
 Increase resistance to extension or hyperextension.
 Through feedback, it reminds the wearer to limit
neck movement.
 Retains heat; reduce muscle spasm and aid in
healing of soft tissues.
HEADMASTER COLLAR (ADJUSTABLE WIRE FRAME
CERVICAL COLLAR) - FLEXIBLE
 Lightweight, open, and is comfortable in warm climates.
 It is easily formed by hand to fit snuggly under the chin.
 It is made of a specially tempered wire frame which is
liberally padded with foam rubber covered in a soft,
washable fabric and uses a Velcro closure strap attached
to cushioned back piece.
 Used with weak neck extensors to prevent the head from
falling forward, however, if weakness is present in rotation
and/or lateral flexion
EXECUTIVE COLLAR:
 Comfortable, lightweight Kydex frame, open neck
design.
 An occipital strap can be positioned to fit any neck
circumference.
 Useful with patients with weak neck extensors to
prevent the head from falling forward.
 However, if weakness is present in rotation and/or
lateral flexion (i.e. when shaking the head "no" or
touching the ear to the shoulder), it will not be adequate
and more support is needed.
SEMIRIGID COLLAR
 These types of collars are semirigid types made
of anterior and posterior pieces fastened
together by Velcro.
 They provide FE> R> L motion restriction.
 All can be applied when lying down.
 The Phladilphia collar is washable while the
Aspen & Miami have washable padding.
 The Phladilphia can be applied during
showering while the second two had padding
which can be washed and replaced when dry.
 The three may have a tracheostomy opening
 Made of firm plastic with superior and inferior paddings
that wrap around the neck and is secured by velcro
 It may be adjustable in height or may contain an
adjustable chin piece
SEMI-RIGID THOMAS COLLAR:
SEMIRIGID COLLAR:
PHILADELPHIA COLLAR
Indications:
 Anterior cervical fusion, Halo removal, Dens type I
cervical fracture of C2, Anterior diskectomy.
 Suspected cervical trauma in unconscious patients,
Tear-drop fracture of the vertebral body (Note: Some
tear-drop fractures require anterior decompression and
fusion.)
 Cervical strain
thoracic extension can be added to increase
motion restriction and treat C6-T2 injuries.
Semirigid collar: Miami
MIAMI COLLAR
 Semirigid 2-piece
system made of
polyethylene, with
a soft, washable
lining
 same indications
for use as those
for the
Philadelphia collar.
 thoracic extension
can be added to
increase support
and treat C6-T2
injuries.
Semirigid collar: Aspen
MALIBU COLLAR
 semi-rigid, 2-piece orthosis
 anterior opening for a
tracheostomy.
 indications similar to those for
the Miami J and Philadelphia
collars.
 comes in only one size
 adjustable in multiple planes to
ensure proper fit.
 Padding around the chin can be
trimmed to ensure proper fit
 thoracic extension can be added
to increase support and treat C6-
T2 injuries.
Ambu collar
Semirigid and rigid plastics.
Provide more rigid stabilization of the
cervical spine.
Include Occiput & Chin to decrease ROM.
Used in stable spine conditions.
Supported chin is a common place for skin
breakdown.
Clavicle is area HCOs can cause skin
breakdown.
Long-term use associated with decreased
muscle function and dependency.
INDICATIONS:
 ANTERIOR CERVICAL FUSION .
 HALO REMOVAL .
 DENS TYPE I CERVICAL # OF C2.
 ANTERIOR DISKECTOMY.
 SUSPECTED CERVICAL TRAUMA IN
UNCONSCIOUS PATIENTS .
 MOST OF TEARDROP # OF VERTEBRAL
BODY.
 CERVICAL STRAIN .
 G R E AT E R M O T I O N R E S T R I C T I O N I N T H E M I D D L E
T O L O W E R C E R V I C A L S P I N E .
 U P P E R C E R V I C A L S P I N E H A S L E S S M O T I O N
R E S T R I C T I O N .
 U S E D I N M I N I M A L LY U N S TA B L E F R A C T U R E S .
STERNAL-OCCIPITAL-MANDIBULAR IMMOBILIZER (SOMI)
 CTO with anterior chest plate
extending to the xiphoid
process & metal or plastic
bars curve over the shoulder.
 Straps from the bars over the
shoulder & cross to opposite
side of the anterior plate for
fixation.
 2-poster CTOs start from the
chest plate and attach to the
occipital component.
 SOMI is ideal for bedridden
patients because it has no
posterior rods.
 removable chin piece with an optional headpiece
can be used if chin piece is removed for eating.
 Comfortable.
 Proper adjustment is crucial for motion restriction.
INDICATION:
 S O M I C O N T R O L S F L E X I O N I N C 1 - C 3 S E G M E N T S
B E T T E R T H A N C E R V I C O T H O R A C I C B R A C E .
 AT L A N T O A X I A L I N S TA B I L I T Y ( R A ) .
 N E U R A L A R C H F R A C T U R E S O F C 2 ( F L E X I O N
C A U S E S I N S TA B I L I T Y ) .
(F-E-R) SOMI COLLAR
F-E-R control orthosis (sterno-occipital mandibular
immobilizer):
The mandibular support can be removed and the patient can
eat, wash, or shave while supine
MOTION RESTRICTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE SOMI
INCLUDE
 Cervical flexion and extension are
limited by 70%-75%
 Lateral bending is limited by 35%
 Rotation is limited by 60-65%
CERVICAL FELR CONTROL ORTHOSIS
 Four Posters
 Cuirass
 Yale
 Minerva
 Halo
Four-Poster
The four-poster is a rigid cervical orthosis with
anterior and posterior sections consisting of
pads that lie on the chest and are connected by
leather straps.
4 POSTERS CERVICAL ORTHOSIS
Mandibular support Occipital support
Double anterior uprights
Double posterior uprights
Sternal Plate Interscapular Plate
MOTION RESTRICTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE
4-POSTER ORTHOSIS
 Flexion and extension are limited by 80%.
 Lateral bending is limited by 55%-80%.
 Rotation is limited by 70%.
Yale
 The Yale orthosis consists of chin and occipital pieces that
extend higher on the skull in the posterior region; this
increases comfort.
 The Yale orthosis is a modified Philadelphia collar with a
thoracic extension.
 The extension consists of fiberglass that extends both
anteriorly and posteriorly, and has thoracic straps that
hold the sections together.
 The thoracic extension to the orthosis helps to stabilize
injuries at the vertebral levels of C6-T2
Cuirass Orthosis
Minerva Brace (custom moulded)
The Minerva collar has
head straps to provide
additional support and to
keep head immobilized
throughout ttt.
• The halo orthosis provides flexion, extension,
and rotational control of the cervical region.
• Pressure systems are used for control of motion,
as well as to provide slight distraction for
immobilization of the cervical spine.
• This orthosis provides maximum restriction in motion of all the
cervical orthoses. It is the most stable orthosis, especially in the
superior cervical spine segment.
• A halo is used for approximately 3 months (10 to 12 weeks) to
ensure healing of a fracture or of a spinal fusion.
• Usually a cervical collar is indicated after the halo is removed,
because the muscles and ligaments supporting the head
become weak after disuse.
• All pins on the halo ring should be checked to ensure tightness
24 to 48 hours after application.
Indications
• Dens type I, II, or III fractures of C2 .
• C1 fractures with rupture of the transverse ligament
• Atlantoaxial instability from RA, with ligamentous
disruption and erosion of the dens.
• C2 neural arch fractures and disc disruption between C2
and C3. Bony, single-column cervical fractures
• Cervical arthrodesis - Postoperative
• Cervical tumor resection in an unstable spine -
Postoperative
• Debridement and drainage of infection in an unstable
spine - Postoperative
• Spinal cord injury (SCI)
Contraindications
• Concomitant skull fracture with cervical injury
• Damaged or infected skin over pin insertion sites
Relative contraindications
• Cervical instability with ligamentous disruption
• Cervical instability with 2- or 3-column injury
• Cervical instability with rotational injury involving
facet joints
Complications
• Neck pain or stiffness - 80%
• Pin loosening - 60%
• Pin site infection - 22%
• Scarring - 30%
• Pain at pin sites - 18%
• Pressure sores - 11%
• Redislocation - 10%
• Restricted ventilation - 8%
• Dysphagia - 2%
• Nerve injury - 2%
• Dural puncture - 1%
• Neurological deterioration - 1%
• Avascular necrosis of the dens
• Ring migration
• Inadequate bony healing
• Inadequate ligamentous healing
Complications of cervical orthosis:
extremely mobile joint complex with multiple
planes
little body surface available for contact
high incidence of skin breakdown (occiput, chin)
pressure-related pain common (clavicles, chin)
hygiene issues limit comfort (shaving)
The soft-tissue structures around the neck (eg,
blood vessels, esophagus, trachea) limit the
application of aggressive external force.
Cervical orthosis offer no control for the head or
thorax; therefore, motion restriction is minimal.
(Cervical orthosis serve as a kinesthetic reminder
to limit neck movement.)
 All orthotics tend to control flexion better than
extension
 Limitation of flexion at C1-C3
Halo > 4-poster > CTO
 CTO are best at controlling flexion and
extension at C3-T1
 SOMI brace is best at controlling flexion from
C1-C5
 SOMI is less effective in controlling extension
 Limitation of rotation and lateral bending C1-C3
Halo > cervico-thoracic brace
Cervical Immobilization Pearls
 Extends from sacrum to above the inferior angle of scapula
 Contain thoracic and pelvic bands
 Used to support and stabilize the trunk
 Used in cases of truncal paralysis, post-spinal fusion, post-
scoliotic surgery
 To prevent mild scoliosis 20-45º
 Work through increase intra-abdominal pressure and
reduce weight on vertebral body
 Used in intervertebral disc diseases
TLS Orthoses
a.The TLS F-E control orthosis (Taylor brace)
b.The TLS F-E-L control (Knight Taylor brace)
c.The TLS F-E-R control orthosis (Cowhorn brace)
d.The TLS flexion (F) control orthosis
 Jewett or Becher TLSO
 Cruciform anterior spinal hyper- extension (CASH) TLSO
e. The TLS F-E-L-R control (TLS jacket)
f. Boston TLSO
Extends from sacrum to above the inferior angle of scapula
Taylor & Knight-Taylor brace
Knight-Taylor brace
 Has two lateral and two posterior uprights and shoulder straps.
 Reduce lateral bending, flexion, and extension.
 The brace can be prefabricated and made with polyvinyl chloride
or aluminum.
 The posterior portion of the brace has added cross supports
below the inferior angle of the scapula and a pelvic band fitted at
the sacrococcygeal junction.
 The anterior corset is made of canvas and provides intracavitary
pressure.
 The anterior corset is laced to the lateral uprights.
Indication:
 To provide flexion immobilization to treat thoracic and
lumbar vertebral body fractures.
 Post-surgical support (for years) of traumatic fractures,
spondylolisthesis, scoliosis, spinal stenosis, herniated
disks, and disk infections.
 However, clinicians typically now prefer the custom-
molded TLSO body jackets, because better control of
position is obtained
Motion restrictions:
control of flexion, extension, and a minimal axial
rotation via the three-point pressure systems for each
direction of motion. For e.g, flexion is controlled by:
the posteriorly directed forces applied through the
axillary straps and the abdominal apron, and an
anteriorly directed force through the paraspinal
uprights.
 Knight-Taylor has an additional thoracic band
that extends from the uprights just below the
inferior angle of the scapula to the midsagittal
plane, and a lateral upright on each side that
connects the pelvic band and the thoracic band.
 These bands provide additional lateral support
and motion control to the trunk.
Jewett hyperextension brace
 uses a 3-point pressure system with 1 posterior and 2 anterior pads.
 The anterior pads place pressure over the sternum and pubic symphysis.
 The posterior pad places opposing pressure in the mid-thoracic region.
 The posterior pad keeps the spine in an extended position
 Lightweight design that is more comfortable than the CASH brace.
 Pelvic and sternal pads can be adjusted from the lateral axillary
bar where they attach.
 No abdominal support is provided with this device.
 When the patient is seated, the sternal pad should be half an inch
inferior to the sternal notch, and the pubic pad should be half an
inch superior to the pubic symphysis.
Indication
 Symptomatic relief of stable spinal fractures T6 to L1
not due to osteoporosis
 Immobilization after surgical stabilization of thoraco-
lumbar fractures
 Postural Kyphosis.
Advantage
 Prevents flexion & limits extension of spine
 Controls thoracic spine
 Does not prevent extension
 More comfortable on women
 Velcro closure
Contraindication:
 Three column spine fractures involving anterior,
middle, and posterior spinal structures
 Compression fractures above T6 since segmental
motion increases above the sternal pad
 Compression fractures due to osteoporosis
More effective than the CASH brace.
The TLS flextion (F) control orthosis
Cruciform anterior spinal hyperextension
brace with round anterior chest pads. (CASH)
Indication
 Immobilization of compression
fracture of vertebral bodies from
T6 to L1
 Reduction of kyphosis not in
patients with osteoporosis
Advantage
 Prevents flexion of spine
 Controls thoracic spine
 Does not prevent extension
 More comfortable on women
 Velcro closure
CASH Orthosis
Motion restrictions : Limits flexion from T6-L1
Contraindications :
Three-column spine fractures involving anterior,
middle, and posterior spinal structures .
Compression fractures due to osteoporosis
Custom-molded plastic body jacket
(calmshell)
PLASTIC BODY JACKET
•Fabricated with high-temperature co-
polymer plastics.
• Well-fitted body jacket restrict motion
in all planes.
•Anterior and lateral trunk containment
elevate intracavitary pressure.
•Decrease demands on the vertebral
discs.
• Body jackets are frequently used post
surgically or during an acute trauma.
(flexion-extension-lateral –rotary control)
 Lightweight design and is easy to don and doff.
 Material is easy to clean and comfortable to wear.
 The TLSO provides efficient force transmission as
pressure is distributed over wide surface area, which is
ideal for use in patients with neurologic injuries.
 Use it with an undershirt to absorb perspiration and protect
the skin.
 Frequent checks to ensure proper fit help prevent pressure
ulcers.
 Velcro straps are used to tighten the brace.
Indications
 Immobilization for compression fractures from
osteoporosis
 Immobilization after surgical stabilization for spinal
fractures
 Bracing for idiopathic scoliosis
 Immobilization for unstable spinal disorders for T3
to L3
Motion restrictions custom-molded TLSO
Limits side-bending , flexion ,extension and rotation to some
extent
 It is more effective in preventing idiopathic scoliosis curve
progression than the Milwaukee and Charleston braces.
 The mean curve progression with TLSO is less than 2°
while the Charleston and Milwaukee braces have a curve
progression greater than 6°.
 Fewer than 18% of patients treated with TLSO brace
required surgery for scoliosis compared to 23% for
patients treated with a Milwaukee brace.
 Plastic TLS jacket that extend upward to the mandible and
mastoid.
 The Milwaukee brace, (CTLSO) used for scoliosis has a rigid
plastic pelvic girdle connected to a neck ring over the upper
thorax by one anterior and two posterior uprights.
 Pads strapped to the uprights apply forces to correct the
scoliotic curve.
 It is used for curves at or below T6
Cow horn spinal orthosis
Extend from sacrum to the inferior scapular
angle
a.The LSO (F-E) control orthosis (Chairback orthosis)
b.The LSO (F-E-L) control othosis (Knight spinal)
c.The LSO (E-L) contorl orthosis (Williams brace)
d.The LSO with hip spica or thigh cuff
e.The LS jacket (Boston overlap brace)
Rigid short LSO with 2 posterior uprights with
thoracic and pelvic bands.
 The abdominal apron has straps in front for
adjustment to increase intra-cavitary pressure.
The thoracic band is located 1 inch below the inferior
angle of scapula.
Chairback brace
The thoracic band extends laterally to the mid-axillary
line, and the pelvic band extends laterally to the mid-
trochanteric line.
Position the posterior uprights over the paraspinal
muscles.
Uprights can be made from metal or plastic.
 The brace uses a 3-point pressure system and can
be custom molded to improve the fit for each
individual patient.
Indications :
 Unloading of the intervertebral discs and transmit
pressure to soft tissue areas
 Relief for LBP
 Immobilization after lumbar laminectomy
 Kinesthetic reminder to patient following surgery
Motion restrictions :
 Limits flexion and extension at the L1-L4 level
 Limits rotation minimally
 Limits lateral bending by 45% in the thoracolumbar spine
Chairback Ortho-Mold brace
 Similar to the chairback brace, but it has a rigid
plastic back piece custom molded to the patient.
 The plastic back can be inserted into the canvas
and elastic corset.
 Indications for use are the same as the
chairback brace.
Williams brace
 Short LSO with an anterior elastic apron to allow for forward
flexion.
 Lateral uprights attach to the thoracic band, and oblique bars are
used to connect the pelvic band to the lateral uprights.
 The abdominal apron is laced to the lateral uprights.
 The brace limits extension and lateral trunk movement but allows
forward flexion.
 The brace is indicated to provide motion restriction during
extension to treat spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis.
Contraindication :
 in spinal compression fractures.
Motion restrictions of the Williams brace include the
following:
 Limits extension
 Limits side bending at terminal ends only
 A custom-made orthosis molded
over the iliac crest for improved fit.
 Plastic anterior and posterior shells
overlap for a tight fit.
 Velcro closure in the front is
designed for easy donning and
doffing.
 Multiple holes can be made for
aeration to help decrease moisture
and limit skin maceration.
 The rigid LSO can be trimmed
easily to make adjustments for
patient comfort and may be used in
the shower if needed.
Rigid LSO
Indications:
 Post-surgical lumbar immobilization.
 Treatment of lumbar compression #.
Motion restrictions:
 Limits flexion and extension
 Limits some rotation and side bending
 uses a thigh piece on the symptomatic side and extends to 5 cm
above the patella.
 The hip is held in 20° of flexion to allow sitting and walking.
 Some patients require a cane for ambulation after application.
Indications
 Immobilization to treat lumbar instability from L3-S1
 Immobilization after LS fusion with anchoring to the sacrum
Motion restrictions
 Limits flexion and extension
 Limits some rotation and side bending
Rigid LSO with hip spica
Corsets (Flexible Spinal Orthoses)
 Made of fabric with pouches for vertical stays
 No thoracic or pelvic bands
 The vertical stays are made of plastic or rigid steel
 Create similar forces as rigid SO
 Do NOT restrict movement or spinal re-alignment
 Increase intra-abdominal pressure more than rigid SO
 Used in direct contact with skin
 Has metal bars within the cloth material posteriorly that can be
removed and adjusted to fit the patient.
 The anterior abdominal apron has pull-up laces from the back to
tighten. The abdominal apron can come with Velcro closure for
easy donning and doffing.
 It has a lightweight design and is comfortable to wear.
 The corset increases intracavitary pressure. Anteriorly, the brace
covers the area between the xiphoid process and pubic symphysis.
 Posteriorly, the brace covers the area between the lower scapula
and gluteal fold.
The Standard LSO corset
Indications:
 Treatment of LBP
 Immobilization after lumbar laminectomy
Motion restrictions: limitation of F-E.
The TLS corset:
 Restrict spinal motion at thoracic and lumber spine
 Increase intra-abdominal pressure to remove load from vertebrae
 Remind the wearer to avoid abrupt trunk motion and to lift properly
The LS corset (Richard’s corset)
 It extends to below the inferior angles of the scapulae instead of
the midscapular level
 Same function as TLS corset but does not restrict thoracic spinal
motion
Sacroiliac (SI) Corsets
a.Sacroiliac corset :
 from illiac crest to symphysis pubis
 Used in low back pain and stabilization of sacroilliac joint
b. Sacroiliac belt :
 Encircle the pelvis between the illiac crests
 The belt passes below the anterior superior pelvic spine
 Used in post surgical conditions of pelvis
c.Elastic sacroiliac corset (binder) with plastic insert:
 Similar to the corset
 Mainly used to correct back posture and low back pain
The main goal:
 prevent further deformity
 Prevent or delay need for surgery.
 If surgery is needed, delaying the procedure as long as possible
helps optimize spinal height and avoid stunting of truncal
growth.
 Assessing the degree of skeletal maturity in a child with
scoliosis is important because with more advanced skeletal
maturity, you expect less further skeletal growth and thus less
progression of the scoliosis.
 This has obvious implications when forming a treatment plan.
Risser classification of ossification of the iliac epiphysis:
Used to evaluate skeletal immaturity.
• Ossification of the iliac crest occurs from ASIS to PSIS.
• When ossification is complete, fusion of the epiphysis occurs to the iliac crest.
• Risser staging is based on using radiographs to determine what % of the excursion
(along the length of the iliac epiphysis) has ossified.
• Risser score of 0-I with a curve of 20-30° indicates nearly 70% chance of progression.
Risser stages are defined as follows:
Stage 0 = 0% excursion
Stage I = 25% excursion
Stage II = 50% excursion
Stage III = 75% excursion
Stage IV = 100% excursion and correlates with end of spinal growth
Stage V = fusion to ilium, indicating cessation of vertical height growth
The younger the age, the larger the curve, the shorter the duration of
curve progress and the more the liability to surgery.
 The most common time to lose control of
idiopathic curves is at puberty.
 Boys tend to show less curve progression than
girls, and tend to have later onset of curve
progression between 15-18 years.
 Younger patients show greater initial in-brace
correction.
 Curve correction with bracing >50 degrees is
expected to have final net correction, whereas
curve correction < 50 is expected to have limited
progression.
 Generally, curves between T8-L2 have the best
correction.
 Young patients with large curves usually fail
treatment with a brace.
Biomechanics:
• It is used for scoliosis management.
• It provides control of flexion, extension, and lateral bending of the cervical,
thoracic, and lumber spine.
• It also provides some rotational control of thoracic & lumbar spine.
• Pressure systems are used for control of motion, as well as to provide
correction for the spine.
• It is a good choice for patients who need correction in the higher thoracic
region of the spine.
Design and Fabrication:
The Milwaukee is custom made, consisting of a cervical
portion with the option of a removable cervical ring.
Also used is the thoracolumbar section of the orthosis in
which the correction of the lower thoracic and lumbar spines
is achieved.
 Uprights have localized pads to apply transverse force, which is effective for
small curves.
 The main corrective force is the thoracic pad, which attaches to the 2
posterior uprights and 1 anterior upright. The lumbar pads play a passive
role compared to the thoracic pads.
 The uprights are perpendicular to the pelvic section
 Any leg-length discrepancy should be corrected.
 The neck ring is another corrective force and is designed to give longitudinal
traction.
 Jaw deformity is a potential complication of the neck ring. The throat mold,
instead of a mandibular mold, allows use of distractive force without jaw
deformity.
During the child's growth, brace length can be
adjusted. Pads also can be changed to
compensate for spinal growth. The brace needs to
be changed if pelvic size increases.
Indications
• Patients with a Risser score of I-II, as well as a curve >
20-30° and that progresses by 5° over 1 year
• Curves of 30-40°, but not curves < 20°.
• Curves of 20-30°, with no year-over-year progression,
require observation every 4-6 months.
• The Milwaukee brace is used for curves with apex above
T7.
The Milwaukee brace's duration of use:
• Daily use ranges from 16-23 hr/ day.
• Treatment should continue until the patient is
at Risser stage IV or V.
• If the curve is > 30°, consider continued use
of the brace for 1-2 years after maturity,
because a curve of this magnitude is at
risk of progression.
Advantages
• It may remove for activities of
daily living.
• Because its open design,
there is minimal restriction of
respiration.
• It allows good air circulation
to minimize skin problems.
• It is adjustable to growth and
curve changes.
• Because it has cervical ring
we could use it for high level
curve deformity.
Problems associated with the use of a Milwaukee
brace:
• Jaw deformity
• Pain
• Skin breakdown
• Unsightly appearance
• Difficulty with mobility
• Difficulty with transfers
• Increased energy expenditure with ambulation
BOSTON BRACE
 Is a prefabricated symmetric thoracolumbar-
pelvic mold with built-in lumbar flexion that
can be worn under clothes.
 Lumbar flexion is achieved through
posterior flattening of the brace and
extending of the mold distally to the buttock.
 Braces with superstructures have a curve
apex above T7.
 Curves with an apex at or below T7 do not
require superstructures to immobilize
cervical spine movement.
 Unlike the Milwaukee brace, cannot be
adjusted if the patient grows in height.
Indications for the use of a Boston brace
• A curve of 20-25° with 10° progression over 1 year
• A curve of 25-30° with 5° progression over 1 year
• Skeletally immature patients with a curve of ≥ 30°.
ADVANTAGES
• The Boston brace, in contrast to the Milwaukee brace are
low profile (underarm) an can be worn under clothing.
• The Boston brace fabrication is quicker than Milwaukee
brace.
• Three-point pressure application in The Boston brace.
Problems that are associated with the use
of a Boston brace
• Local discomfort
• Hip flexion contracture
• Trunk weakness
• Increased abdominal pressure
• Skin breakdown
• Accentuation of hypokyphosis in the thoracic
spine, above the brace (contraindication).
Duration of Boston brace use is determined by several
factors:
 Daily use ranges from 16-23 hours per day.
 Treatment should continue until the patient is at Risser stage IV or V.
 If the curve is greater than 30°, consider continued use for 1-2 years
after maturity since these curves are at risk for progression.
 The Boston brace with and without superstructure is equally effective
in treating curves below T7.
CHARLESTON BENDING BRACE
Is a nocturnal only treatment.
CHARLESTON BENDING BRACE (1979)
 It is worn only at night,
which is why it's also
known as a "part-time"
brace
 The Charleston Bending
Brace is molded while he
or she is bent towards
the convexity—or
outward bulge—of the
curve, the concept
behind this design being
that it "over-corrects" the
curve during the eight
hours the brace is worn.
For 20-35 degrees & apex of the curve below the level of the shoulder blade.
Spinal orthosis  dr.aliaa
Spinal orthosis  dr.aliaa
Spinal orthosis  dr.aliaa

More Related Content

What's hot

Transfemoral protheses
Transfemoral prothesesTransfemoral protheses
Transfemoral prothesesSoundar Rajan
 
Upper Limb Orthotics - Dr Sanjay Wadhwa
Upper Limb Orthotics - Dr Sanjay WadhwaUpper Limb Orthotics - Dr Sanjay Wadhwa
Upper Limb Orthotics - Dr Sanjay Wadhwamrinal joshi
 
Socket variants in upper extremity prosthesis.pptx1
Socket variants in upper extremity prosthesis.pptx1Socket variants in upper extremity prosthesis.pptx1
Socket variants in upper extremity prosthesis.pptx1POLY GHOSH
 
Prosthetics foot
Prosthetics footProsthetics foot
Prosthetics footPOLY GHOSH
 
Upper Limb Prosthetics - Dr Om Prakash
Upper Limb Prosthetics - Dr Om PrakashUpper Limb Prosthetics - Dr Om Prakash
Upper Limb Prosthetics - Dr Om Prakashmrinal joshi
 
Patellar tendon bearing prosthesis
Patellar tendon bearing prosthesisPatellar tendon bearing prosthesis
Patellar tendon bearing prosthesisDr Madhusudhan NC
 
SLAP PRODROME -PHYSIOTHERAPEUTICS
 SLAP PRODROME  -PHYSIOTHERAPEUTICS SLAP PRODROME  -PHYSIOTHERAPEUTICS
SLAP PRODROME -PHYSIOTHERAPEUTICSDr.Kannabiran Bhojan
 
LOWER LIMB PROSTHETIC CHECKOUTS
LOWER LIMB PROSTHETIC CHECKOUTSLOWER LIMB PROSTHETIC CHECKOUTS
LOWER LIMB PROSTHETIC CHECKOUTSAbey P Rajan
 
Biomechanical principles of orthotics
Biomechanical principles of orthoticsBiomechanical principles of orthotics
Biomechanical principles of orthoticsMayank Anthwal
 
Upper extremity orthotics
Upper extremity orthoticsUpper extremity orthotics
Upper extremity orthoticsCPO India
 

What's hot (20)

Transfemoral protheses
Transfemoral prothesesTransfemoral protheses
Transfemoral protheses
 
Upper Limb Orthotics - Dr Sanjay Wadhwa
Upper Limb Orthotics - Dr Sanjay WadhwaUpper Limb Orthotics - Dr Sanjay Wadhwa
Upper Limb Orthotics - Dr Sanjay Wadhwa
 
Spinal orthoses
Spinal orthosesSpinal orthoses
Spinal orthoses
 
HIP DISARTICULATION
HIP DISARTICULATIONHIP DISARTICULATION
HIP DISARTICULATION
 
Socket variants in upper extremity prosthesis.pptx1
Socket variants in upper extremity prosthesis.pptx1Socket variants in upper extremity prosthesis.pptx1
Socket variants in upper extremity prosthesis.pptx1
 
ORTHOSIS
ORTHOSISORTHOSIS
ORTHOSIS
 
Prosthetics foot
Prosthetics footProsthetics foot
Prosthetics foot
 
Upper Limb Prosthetics - Dr Om Prakash
Upper Limb Prosthetics - Dr Om PrakashUpper Limb Prosthetics - Dr Om Prakash
Upper Limb Prosthetics - Dr Om Prakash
 
Patellar tendon bearing prosthesis
Patellar tendon bearing prosthesisPatellar tendon bearing prosthesis
Patellar tendon bearing prosthesis
 
Orthosis
OrthosisOrthosis
Orthosis
 
SLAP PRODROME -PHYSIOTHERAPEUTICS
 SLAP PRODROME  -PHYSIOTHERAPEUTICS SLAP PRODROME  -PHYSIOTHERAPEUTICS
SLAP PRODROME -PHYSIOTHERAPEUTICS
 
Ankle Foot Orthosis
Ankle Foot OrthosisAnkle Foot Orthosis
Ankle Foot Orthosis
 
LOWER LIMB PROSTHETIC CHECKOUTS
LOWER LIMB PROSTHETIC CHECKOUTSLOWER LIMB PROSTHETIC CHECKOUTS
LOWER LIMB PROSTHETIC CHECKOUTS
 
Prosthesis principle
Prosthesis principleProsthesis principle
Prosthesis principle
 
Biomechanical principles of orthotics
Biomechanical principles of orthoticsBiomechanical principles of orthotics
Biomechanical principles of orthotics
 
Wheelchairs - Types and Parts
Wheelchairs - Types and PartsWheelchairs - Types and Parts
Wheelchairs - Types and Parts
 
Orthotics and Splints
Orthotics and SplintsOrthotics and Splints
Orthotics and Splints
 
Upper extremity orthotics
Upper extremity orthoticsUpper extremity orthotics
Upper extremity orthotics
 
Osteotomy and physiotherapy
Osteotomy and physiotherapy Osteotomy and physiotherapy
Osteotomy and physiotherapy
 
Shoulder arthroplasty & Physiotherapy
Shoulder arthroplasty & PhysiotherapyShoulder arthroplasty & Physiotherapy
Shoulder arthroplasty & Physiotherapy
 

Viewers also liked

Orthotics and ptrosthetics
Orthotics and ptrostheticsOrthotics and ptrosthetics
Orthotics and ptrostheticsSnehal Desai
 
Introd &amp;ll orthosis dr.aliaa
Introd &amp;ll orthosis  dr.aliaaIntrod &amp;ll orthosis  dr.aliaa
Introd &amp;ll orthosis dr.aliaaAliaa El-hady
 
Orthotics and prosthetics UG lecture
Orthotics and prosthetics UG lectureOrthotics and prosthetics UG lecture
Orthotics and prosthetics UG lectureDhananjaya Sabat
 
Lower limb orthoses
Lower limb orthosesLower limb orthoses
Lower limb orthosesorthoprince
 
Lumbar Scaral Orthosis & Thoracic Lumbar Sacral Orthosis (LSO/TLSO) CARE AND ...
Lumbar Scaral Orthosis & Thoracic Lumbar Sacral Orthosis (LSO/TLSO) CARE AND ...Lumbar Scaral Orthosis & Thoracic Lumbar Sacral Orthosis (LSO/TLSO) CARE AND ...
Lumbar Scaral Orthosis & Thoracic Lumbar Sacral Orthosis (LSO/TLSO) CARE AND ...Comprehensive Prosthetics & Orthotics
 
1362465385 managinig neuropathic ulcer skke
1362465385 managinig neuropathic ulcer skke 1362465385 managinig neuropathic ulcer skke
1362465385 managinig neuropathic ulcer skke dfsimedia
 
Amputation Prevention
Amputation PreventionAmputation Prevention
Amputation PreventionDonald Pelto
 
Early Treatment of Scoliosis in Spinal Atrophy
Early Treatment of Scoliosis in Spinal AtrophyEarly Treatment of Scoliosis in Spinal Atrophy
Early Treatment of Scoliosis in Spinal AtrophyNorma Obaid
 
Case Review #4: 31 year old woman with Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis
Case Review #4: 31 year old woman with Adult Idiopathic ScoliosisCase Review #4: 31 year old woman with Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis
Case Review #4: 31 year old woman with Adult Idiopathic ScoliosisRobert Pashman
 
ΝΟΣΟΣ ΕΚΦΥΛΙΣΜΕΝΟΥ ΔΙΣΚΟΥ
ΝΟΣΟΣ  ΕΚΦΥΛΙΣΜΕΝΟΥ ΔΙΣΚΟΥΝΟΣΟΣ  ΕΚΦΥΛΙΣΜΕΝΟΥ ΔΙΣΚΟΥ
ΝΟΣΟΣ ΕΚΦΥΛΙΣΜΕΝΟΥ ΔΙΣΚΟΥAlexander Bardis
 
Complications develop in foot related to Diabetic
Complications develop in foot related to DiabeticComplications develop in foot related to Diabetic
Complications develop in foot related to DiabeticApeksha Sulakkhana
 
Thoracolumbar braces for the treatment of A.I.S. Is there any difference?
Thoracolumbar braces for the treatment of A.I.S.Is there any difference?Thoracolumbar braces for the treatment of A.I.S.Is there any difference?
Thoracolumbar braces for the treatment of A.I.S. Is there any difference?Alexander Bardis
 
Commonwealth Foot & Ankle Treatments
Commonwealth Foot & Ankle TreatmentsCommonwealth Foot & Ankle Treatments
Commonwealth Foot & Ankle Treatmentsguestad9e06e
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Orthotics and ptrosthetics
Orthotics and ptrostheticsOrthotics and ptrosthetics
Orthotics and ptrosthetics
 
Braces scoliosis
Braces scoliosisBraces scoliosis
Braces scoliosis
 
Scoliosis bracing
Scoliosis bracingScoliosis bracing
Scoliosis bracing
 
Introd &amp;ll orthosis dr.aliaa
Introd &amp;ll orthosis  dr.aliaaIntrod &amp;ll orthosis  dr.aliaa
Introd &amp;ll orthosis dr.aliaa
 
Orthotics
OrthoticsOrthotics
Orthotics
 
Orthotics and prosthetics UG lecture
Orthotics and prosthetics UG lectureOrthotics and prosthetics UG lecture
Orthotics and prosthetics UG lecture
 
Lower limb orthoses
Lower limb orthosesLower limb orthoses
Lower limb orthoses
 
Lumbar Scaral Orthosis & Thoracic Lumbar Sacral Orthosis (LSO/TLSO) CARE AND ...
Lumbar Scaral Orthosis & Thoracic Lumbar Sacral Orthosis (LSO/TLSO) CARE AND ...Lumbar Scaral Orthosis & Thoracic Lumbar Sacral Orthosis (LSO/TLSO) CARE AND ...
Lumbar Scaral Orthosis & Thoracic Lumbar Sacral Orthosis (LSO/TLSO) CARE AND ...
 
1362465385 managinig neuropathic ulcer skke
1362465385 managinig neuropathic ulcer skke 1362465385 managinig neuropathic ulcer skke
1362465385 managinig neuropathic ulcer skke
 
Amputation Prevention
Amputation PreventionAmputation Prevention
Amputation Prevention
 
Early Treatment of Scoliosis in Spinal Atrophy
Early Treatment of Scoliosis in Spinal AtrophyEarly Treatment of Scoliosis in Spinal Atrophy
Early Treatment of Scoliosis in Spinal Atrophy
 
Braces final 4 apr-2008
Braces final 4 apr-2008Braces final 4 apr-2008
Braces final 4 apr-2008
 
Case Review #4: 31 year old woman with Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis
Case Review #4: 31 year old woman with Adult Idiopathic ScoliosisCase Review #4: 31 year old woman with Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis
Case Review #4: 31 year old woman with Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis
 
ΝΟΣΟΣ ΕΚΦΥΛΙΣΜΕΝΟΥ ΔΙΣΚΟΥ
ΝΟΣΟΣ  ΕΚΦΥΛΙΣΜΕΝΟΥ ΔΙΣΚΟΥΝΟΣΟΣ  ΕΚΦΥΛΙΣΜΕΝΟΥ ΔΙΣΚΟΥ
ΝΟΣΟΣ ΕΚΦΥΛΙΣΜΕΝΟΥ ΔΙΣΚΟΥ
 
Orthotic care
Orthotic careOrthotic care
Orthotic care
 
Complications develop in foot related to Diabetic
Complications develop in foot related to DiabeticComplications develop in foot related to Diabetic
Complications develop in foot related to Diabetic
 
Surgery For Scoliosis
Surgery For ScoliosisSurgery For Scoliosis
Surgery For Scoliosis
 
Thoracolumbar braces for the treatment of A.I.S. Is there any difference?
Thoracolumbar braces for the treatment of A.I.S.Is there any difference?Thoracolumbar braces for the treatment of A.I.S.Is there any difference?
Thoracolumbar braces for the treatment of A.I.S. Is there any difference?
 
Commonwealth Foot & Ankle Treatments
Commonwealth Foot & Ankle TreatmentsCommonwealth Foot & Ankle Treatments
Commonwealth Foot & Ankle Treatments
 
Dr tarek orthotic overview
Dr tarek orthotic overviewDr tarek orthotic overview
Dr tarek orthotic overview
 

Similar to Spinal orthosis dr.aliaa

Similar to Spinal orthosis dr.aliaa (20)

Spinal orthotics and walking aids
Spinal orthotics and walking aids Spinal orthotics and walking aids
Spinal orthotics and walking aids
 
Spinal Cord Injury 3
Spinal Cord Injury 3Spinal Cord Injury 3
Spinal Cord Injury 3
 
Hip_Disloc_Fem_Hd_Fxs
Hip_Disloc_Fem_Hd_FxsHip_Disloc_Fem_Hd_Fxs
Hip_Disloc_Fem_Hd_Fxs
 
Spine Orthotics-1.pdf
Spine Orthotics-1.pdfSpine Orthotics-1.pdf
Spine Orthotics-1.pdf
 
Management of Hip Dislocations
Management of Hip DislocationsManagement of Hip Dislocations
Management of Hip Dislocations
 
Pediatric hip orthoses.pptx
Pediatric hip orthoses.pptxPediatric hip orthoses.pptx
Pediatric hip orthoses.pptx
 
AMPUTATION.pdf
AMPUTATION.pdfAMPUTATION.pdf
AMPUTATION.pdf
 
Reverse Total Shoulder Replacement, Final
Reverse Total Shoulder Replacement, FinalReverse Total Shoulder Replacement, Final
Reverse Total Shoulder Replacement, Final
 
Fracture of neck of femur
Fracture of neck of femurFracture of neck of femur
Fracture of neck of femur
 
Old unreduced dislocations
Old unreduced dislocationsOld unreduced dislocations
Old unreduced dislocations
 
Comfort Positions
Comfort PositionsComfort Positions
Comfort Positions
 
SPRENGEL SHOULDER.pptx
SPRENGEL SHOULDER.pptxSPRENGEL SHOULDER.pptx
SPRENGEL SHOULDER.pptx
 
Rotator cuff injuries
Rotator cuff injuriesRotator cuff injuries
Rotator cuff injuries
 
Rotator cuff injury
Rotator cuff injuryRotator cuff injury
Rotator cuff injury
 
Walking aids
Walking aidsWalking aids
Walking aids
 
talus fracture
talus fracturetalus fracture
talus fracture
 
Talar Fracture
Talar FractureTalar Fracture
Talar Fracture
 
SHOULDER DISLOCATION-1.pptx
SHOULDER DISLOCATION-1.pptxSHOULDER DISLOCATION-1.pptx
SHOULDER DISLOCATION-1.pptx
 
Knee biomechanics
Knee biomechanicsKnee biomechanics
Knee biomechanics
 
Hip dislocations and femoral head fractures
Hip dislocations and femoral head fracturesHip dislocations and femoral head fractures
Hip dislocations and femoral head fractures
 

Recently uploaded

Pests of safflower_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of safflower_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of safflower_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of safflower_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR.pdfPirithiRaju
 
STOPPED FLOW METHOD & APPLICATION MURUGAVENI B.pptx
STOPPED FLOW METHOD & APPLICATION MURUGAVENI B.pptxSTOPPED FLOW METHOD & APPLICATION MURUGAVENI B.pptx
STOPPED FLOW METHOD & APPLICATION MURUGAVENI B.pptxMurugaveni B
 
Call Girls in Majnu Ka Tilla Delhi 🔝9711014705🔝 Genuine
Call Girls in Majnu Ka Tilla Delhi 🔝9711014705🔝 GenuineCall Girls in Majnu Ka Tilla Delhi 🔝9711014705🔝 Genuine
Call Girls in Majnu Ka Tilla Delhi 🔝9711014705🔝 Genuinethapagita
 
Bioteknologi kelas 10 kumer smapsa .pptx
Bioteknologi kelas 10 kumer smapsa .pptxBioteknologi kelas 10 kumer smapsa .pptx
Bioteknologi kelas 10 kumer smapsa .pptx023NiWayanAnggiSriWa
 
LIGHT-PHENOMENA-BY-CABUALDIONALDOPANOGANCADIENTE-CONDEZA (1).pptx
LIGHT-PHENOMENA-BY-CABUALDIONALDOPANOGANCADIENTE-CONDEZA (1).pptxLIGHT-PHENOMENA-BY-CABUALDIONALDOPANOGANCADIENTE-CONDEZA (1).pptx
LIGHT-PHENOMENA-BY-CABUALDIONALDOPANOGANCADIENTE-CONDEZA (1).pptxmalonesandreagweneth
 
Speech, hearing, noise, intelligibility.pptx
Speech, hearing, noise, intelligibility.pptxSpeech, hearing, noise, intelligibility.pptx
Speech, hearing, noise, intelligibility.pptxpriyankatabhane
 
(9818099198) Call Girls In Noida Sector 14 (NOIDA ESCORTS)
(9818099198) Call Girls In Noida Sector 14 (NOIDA ESCORTS)(9818099198) Call Girls In Noida Sector 14 (NOIDA ESCORTS)
(9818099198) Call Girls In Noida Sector 14 (NOIDA ESCORTS)riyaescorts54
 
Transposable elements in prokaryotes.ppt
Transposable elements in prokaryotes.pptTransposable elements in prokaryotes.ppt
Transposable elements in prokaryotes.pptArshadWarsi13
 
BUMI DAN ANTARIKSA PROJEK IPAS SMK KELAS X.pdf
BUMI DAN ANTARIKSA PROJEK IPAS SMK KELAS X.pdfBUMI DAN ANTARIKSA PROJEK IPAS SMK KELAS X.pdf
BUMI DAN ANTARIKSA PROJEK IPAS SMK KELAS X.pdfWildaNurAmalia2
 
Neurodevelopmental disorders according to the dsm 5 tr
Neurodevelopmental disorders according to the dsm 5 trNeurodevelopmental disorders according to the dsm 5 tr
Neurodevelopmental disorders according to the dsm 5 trssuser06f238
 
Vision and reflection on Mining Software Repositories research in 2024
Vision and reflection on Mining Software Repositories research in 2024Vision and reflection on Mining Software Repositories research in 2024
Vision and reflection on Mining Software Repositories research in 2024AyushiRastogi48
 
Pests of castor_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of castor_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of castor_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of castor_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR.pdfPirithiRaju
 
Microphone- characteristics,carbon microphone, dynamic microphone.pptx
Microphone- characteristics,carbon microphone, dynamic microphone.pptxMicrophone- characteristics,carbon microphone, dynamic microphone.pptx
Microphone- characteristics,carbon microphone, dynamic microphone.pptxpriyankatabhane
 
Pests of jatropha_Bionomics_identification_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of jatropha_Bionomics_identification_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of jatropha_Bionomics_identification_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of jatropha_Bionomics_identification_Dr.UPR.pdfPirithiRaju
 
Citronella presentation SlideShare mani upadhyay
Citronella presentation SlideShare mani upadhyayCitronella presentation SlideShare mani upadhyay
Citronella presentation SlideShare mani upadhyayupadhyaymani499
 
Davis plaque method.pptx recombinant DNA technology
Davis plaque method.pptx recombinant DNA technologyDavis plaque method.pptx recombinant DNA technology
Davis plaque method.pptx recombinant DNA technologycaarthichand2003
 
THE ROLE OF PHARMACOGNOSY IN TRADITIONAL AND MODERN SYSTEM OF MEDICINE.pptx
THE ROLE OF PHARMACOGNOSY IN TRADITIONAL AND MODERN SYSTEM OF MEDICINE.pptxTHE ROLE OF PHARMACOGNOSY IN TRADITIONAL AND MODERN SYSTEM OF MEDICINE.pptx
THE ROLE OF PHARMACOGNOSY IN TRADITIONAL AND MODERN SYSTEM OF MEDICINE.pptxNandakishor Bhaurao Deshmukh
 
Environmental Biotechnology Topic:- Microbial Biosensor
Environmental Biotechnology Topic:- Microbial BiosensorEnvironmental Biotechnology Topic:- Microbial Biosensor
Environmental Biotechnology Topic:- Microbial Biosensorsonawaneprad
 
Four Spheres of the Earth Presentation.ppt
Four Spheres of the Earth Presentation.pptFour Spheres of the Earth Presentation.ppt
Four Spheres of the Earth Presentation.pptJoemSTuliba
 
User Guide: Magellan MX™ Weather Station
User Guide: Magellan MX™ Weather StationUser Guide: Magellan MX™ Weather Station
User Guide: Magellan MX™ Weather StationColumbia Weather Systems
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Pests of safflower_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of safflower_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of safflower_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of safflower_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR.pdf
 
STOPPED FLOW METHOD & APPLICATION MURUGAVENI B.pptx
STOPPED FLOW METHOD & APPLICATION MURUGAVENI B.pptxSTOPPED FLOW METHOD & APPLICATION MURUGAVENI B.pptx
STOPPED FLOW METHOD & APPLICATION MURUGAVENI B.pptx
 
Call Girls in Majnu Ka Tilla Delhi 🔝9711014705🔝 Genuine
Call Girls in Majnu Ka Tilla Delhi 🔝9711014705🔝 GenuineCall Girls in Majnu Ka Tilla Delhi 🔝9711014705🔝 Genuine
Call Girls in Majnu Ka Tilla Delhi 🔝9711014705🔝 Genuine
 
Bioteknologi kelas 10 kumer smapsa .pptx
Bioteknologi kelas 10 kumer smapsa .pptxBioteknologi kelas 10 kumer smapsa .pptx
Bioteknologi kelas 10 kumer smapsa .pptx
 
LIGHT-PHENOMENA-BY-CABUALDIONALDOPANOGANCADIENTE-CONDEZA (1).pptx
LIGHT-PHENOMENA-BY-CABUALDIONALDOPANOGANCADIENTE-CONDEZA (1).pptxLIGHT-PHENOMENA-BY-CABUALDIONALDOPANOGANCADIENTE-CONDEZA (1).pptx
LIGHT-PHENOMENA-BY-CABUALDIONALDOPANOGANCADIENTE-CONDEZA (1).pptx
 
Speech, hearing, noise, intelligibility.pptx
Speech, hearing, noise, intelligibility.pptxSpeech, hearing, noise, intelligibility.pptx
Speech, hearing, noise, intelligibility.pptx
 
(9818099198) Call Girls In Noida Sector 14 (NOIDA ESCORTS)
(9818099198) Call Girls In Noida Sector 14 (NOIDA ESCORTS)(9818099198) Call Girls In Noida Sector 14 (NOIDA ESCORTS)
(9818099198) Call Girls In Noida Sector 14 (NOIDA ESCORTS)
 
Transposable elements in prokaryotes.ppt
Transposable elements in prokaryotes.pptTransposable elements in prokaryotes.ppt
Transposable elements in prokaryotes.ppt
 
BUMI DAN ANTARIKSA PROJEK IPAS SMK KELAS X.pdf
BUMI DAN ANTARIKSA PROJEK IPAS SMK KELAS X.pdfBUMI DAN ANTARIKSA PROJEK IPAS SMK KELAS X.pdf
BUMI DAN ANTARIKSA PROJEK IPAS SMK KELAS X.pdf
 
Neurodevelopmental disorders according to the dsm 5 tr
Neurodevelopmental disorders according to the dsm 5 trNeurodevelopmental disorders according to the dsm 5 tr
Neurodevelopmental disorders according to the dsm 5 tr
 
Vision and reflection on Mining Software Repositories research in 2024
Vision and reflection on Mining Software Repositories research in 2024Vision and reflection on Mining Software Repositories research in 2024
Vision and reflection on Mining Software Repositories research in 2024
 
Pests of castor_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of castor_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of castor_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of castor_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR.pdf
 
Microphone- characteristics,carbon microphone, dynamic microphone.pptx
Microphone- characteristics,carbon microphone, dynamic microphone.pptxMicrophone- characteristics,carbon microphone, dynamic microphone.pptx
Microphone- characteristics,carbon microphone, dynamic microphone.pptx
 
Pests of jatropha_Bionomics_identification_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of jatropha_Bionomics_identification_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of jatropha_Bionomics_identification_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of jatropha_Bionomics_identification_Dr.UPR.pdf
 
Citronella presentation SlideShare mani upadhyay
Citronella presentation SlideShare mani upadhyayCitronella presentation SlideShare mani upadhyay
Citronella presentation SlideShare mani upadhyay
 
Davis plaque method.pptx recombinant DNA technology
Davis plaque method.pptx recombinant DNA technologyDavis plaque method.pptx recombinant DNA technology
Davis plaque method.pptx recombinant DNA technology
 
THE ROLE OF PHARMACOGNOSY IN TRADITIONAL AND MODERN SYSTEM OF MEDICINE.pptx
THE ROLE OF PHARMACOGNOSY IN TRADITIONAL AND MODERN SYSTEM OF MEDICINE.pptxTHE ROLE OF PHARMACOGNOSY IN TRADITIONAL AND MODERN SYSTEM OF MEDICINE.pptx
THE ROLE OF PHARMACOGNOSY IN TRADITIONAL AND MODERN SYSTEM OF MEDICINE.pptx
 
Environmental Biotechnology Topic:- Microbial Biosensor
Environmental Biotechnology Topic:- Microbial BiosensorEnvironmental Biotechnology Topic:- Microbial Biosensor
Environmental Biotechnology Topic:- Microbial Biosensor
 
Four Spheres of the Earth Presentation.ppt
Four Spheres of the Earth Presentation.pptFour Spheres of the Earth Presentation.ppt
Four Spheres of the Earth Presentation.ppt
 
User Guide: Magellan MX™ Weather Station
User Guide: Magellan MX™ Weather StationUser Guide: Magellan MX™ Weather Station
User Guide: Magellan MX™ Weather Station
 

Spinal orthosis dr.aliaa

  • 1.
  • 2. Dr. Aliaa Omar EL-Hady MD. Physical medicine, Rheum. & Rehabilitation
  • 3.
  • 4. • Ancient Egyptians used 1st splints ~ 5.000 ys ago, not to stabilize joints or body parts. • Middle Ages armorers manufactured splints that protected as well as stabilized the body. • French surgeon, Ambroise Pare` developed metal corsets in the late 16th century HISTORY
  • 5. • Lorenz Heister is credited with developing 1st spinal orthosis in the late 17th century. It was quite similar to the modern day Halo brace. • The basic principles of spinal immobilization have actually changed little in the past 300 years, however the materials used and combination of surgery and bracing has changed tremendously. HISTORY
  • 6.
  • 7. SPINE BIOMECHANICS • Three flexible curves of vertebral column (cervical, thoracic & lumbar) • Transfers load from head & trunk to pelvis. • Protects spinal cord. • Permits motion in three planes. • Vertebral bodies progressively larger in size caudally to sustain increasing superimposed weight.
  • 8. • Intrinsic Stability: Intervertbral disc + surrounding ligaments. • Extrinsic Stability: muscles
  • 9. •Intervertbral discs bears & distributes loads & restrains excessive motion. •Intradiscal pressure is 1.5 times of external load in compression.
  • 10. S P I N A L M O T I O N
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18. Characteristics of spinal orthosis:  Weight of the orthosis  Adjustability  Functional use  Cosmesis  Cost  Durability  Material  Ability to fit various sizes of patients  Ease of putting on (donning) and taking off (doffing)  Access to tracheostomy site, peg tube, or other drains  Access to surgical sites for wound care  Aeration to avoid skin maceration from moisture
  • 19. Indications of spinal orthosis: Pain relief Mechanical unloading Scoliosis management Spinal immobilization after surgery Spinal immobilization after traumatic injury Compression fracture management Kinesthetic reminder to avoid certain movements
  • 20. The biomechanical principles of orthotic design include :  balance of horizontal forces.  fluid compression.  distraction.  construction of a cage around the patient.  skeletal fixation. In general, structural damage to posterior elements of the spine creates more instability with flexion, whereas damage to anterior elements creates more instability with extension.
  • 21. Construction of a cage around the patient leads to:  Balance of horizontal forces  Increase intra-abdominal pressure  Relieve load on vertebrae  Prevention of certain movements  Stability
  • 22. Duration of use of spinal orthosis:  Pain: 1-2 weeks.  Instability: till the patient can tolerate discomfort.  Post surgical: after acute fractures 6-12 weeks  Gradual removal + static EX
  • 23. Complications of spinal orthosis:  Discomfort & local pain  Osteopenia  Skin breakdown  Nerve compression  Ingrown facial hair for men  Muscle atrophy with prolonged use  Decreased pulmonary capacity  Increased energy expenditure with ambulation  Difficulty donning and doffing orthosis  Difficulty with transfers  Psychological and physical dependency  Increased segmental motion at ends of the orthosis  Unsightly appearance  Poor patient compliance
  • 24. Success of spinal orthosis:  Decreased pain  Increased strength  Improved function  Increased proprioception  Improved posture  Correction of spinal curve deformity  Protection against spinal instability  Minimized complications  Healing of ligaments and bones
  • 25. CLASSIFICATION According To Region Crossed • Crevical (CO ) • Head Cervical Orthoses (HCO) • Cervicothoracic Orthoses (CTO) • Halo Device • Thoracolumbar Orthoses (TLO) • Lumbosacral Orthoses (LSO) • Thoracolumbosacral orthosis ( TLSO)
  • 26. CLASSIFICATION According To Motion Restriction • Flexion- Extension FE control • Flexion- Extension- Rotation FER Control • Flexion- Extension- Lateral bending- Rotation- FELR Control
  • 27. CLASSIFICATION According To Materials Used • Rigid • Flexible
  • 28.
  • 29. Cervical Orthosis F-E • Soft (zimmer) • Hard (semi-rigid): moulded • a. Thomas • b. Philadelphia • c. Aspen • d. Miami • Collars for weak neck extensors: Head master & Executive F-E-R • SOMI F-E-L-R • 1- Poster • 2- Custom • Minerva • Cuirass • 3- Yale • 4- Halo vest
  • 30. CERVICAL ORTHOSES (COLLARS) Flexible Soft Collar • Made from soft foam. • Provide mechanical restraint (5-15%) • Psychologic comfort. • Head support when acute neck pain occurs. • Relief from minor muscle spasm. • Relief from cervical strain.
  • 31. Soft cervical collar: Polyethylene or foam  Least limitation of cervical motion.  Increase resistance to extension or hyperextension.  Through feedback, it reminds the wearer to limit neck movement.  Retains heat; reduce muscle spasm and aid in healing of soft tissues.
  • 32. HEADMASTER COLLAR (ADJUSTABLE WIRE FRAME CERVICAL COLLAR) - FLEXIBLE  Lightweight, open, and is comfortable in warm climates.  It is easily formed by hand to fit snuggly under the chin.  It is made of a specially tempered wire frame which is liberally padded with foam rubber covered in a soft, washable fabric and uses a Velcro closure strap attached to cushioned back piece.  Used with weak neck extensors to prevent the head from falling forward, however, if weakness is present in rotation and/or lateral flexion
  • 33. EXECUTIVE COLLAR:  Comfortable, lightweight Kydex frame, open neck design.  An occipital strap can be positioned to fit any neck circumference.  Useful with patients with weak neck extensors to prevent the head from falling forward.  However, if weakness is present in rotation and/or lateral flexion (i.e. when shaking the head "no" or touching the ear to the shoulder), it will not be adequate and more support is needed.
  • 34. SEMIRIGID COLLAR  These types of collars are semirigid types made of anterior and posterior pieces fastened together by Velcro.  They provide FE> R> L motion restriction.  All can be applied when lying down.  The Phladilphia collar is washable while the Aspen & Miami have washable padding.  The Phladilphia can be applied during showering while the second two had padding which can be washed and replaced when dry.  The three may have a tracheostomy opening
  • 35.  Made of firm plastic with superior and inferior paddings that wrap around the neck and is secured by velcro  It may be adjustable in height or may contain an adjustable chin piece SEMI-RIGID THOMAS COLLAR:
  • 36. SEMIRIGID COLLAR: PHILADELPHIA COLLAR Indications:  Anterior cervical fusion, Halo removal, Dens type I cervical fracture of C2, Anterior diskectomy.  Suspected cervical trauma in unconscious patients, Tear-drop fracture of the vertebral body (Note: Some tear-drop fractures require anterior decompression and fusion.)  Cervical strain
  • 37.
  • 38. thoracic extension can be added to increase motion restriction and treat C6-T2 injuries.
  • 40. MIAMI COLLAR  Semirigid 2-piece system made of polyethylene, with a soft, washable lining  same indications for use as those for the Philadelphia collar.  thoracic extension can be added to increase support and treat C6-T2 injuries.
  • 42. MALIBU COLLAR  semi-rigid, 2-piece orthosis  anterior opening for a tracheostomy.  indications similar to those for the Miami J and Philadelphia collars.  comes in only one size  adjustable in multiple planes to ensure proper fit.  Padding around the chin can be trimmed to ensure proper fit  thoracic extension can be added to increase support and treat C6- T2 injuries.
  • 44. Semirigid and rigid plastics. Provide more rigid stabilization of the cervical spine. Include Occiput & Chin to decrease ROM. Used in stable spine conditions. Supported chin is a common place for skin breakdown. Clavicle is area HCOs can cause skin breakdown. Long-term use associated with decreased muscle function and dependency.
  • 45. INDICATIONS:  ANTERIOR CERVICAL FUSION .  HALO REMOVAL .  DENS TYPE I CERVICAL # OF C2.  ANTERIOR DISKECTOMY.  SUSPECTED CERVICAL TRAUMA IN UNCONSCIOUS PATIENTS .  MOST OF TEARDROP # OF VERTEBRAL BODY.  CERVICAL STRAIN .
  • 46.  G R E AT E R M O T I O N R E S T R I C T I O N I N T H E M I D D L E T O L O W E R C E R V I C A L S P I N E .  U P P E R C E R V I C A L S P I N E H A S L E S S M O T I O N R E S T R I C T I O N .  U S E D I N M I N I M A L LY U N S TA B L E F R A C T U R E S .
  • 47. STERNAL-OCCIPITAL-MANDIBULAR IMMOBILIZER (SOMI)  CTO with anterior chest plate extending to the xiphoid process & metal or plastic bars curve over the shoulder.  Straps from the bars over the shoulder & cross to opposite side of the anterior plate for fixation.  2-poster CTOs start from the chest plate and attach to the occipital component.  SOMI is ideal for bedridden patients because it has no posterior rods.
  • 48.
  • 49.  removable chin piece with an optional headpiece can be used if chin piece is removed for eating.  Comfortable.  Proper adjustment is crucial for motion restriction.
  • 50. INDICATION:  S O M I C O N T R O L S F L E X I O N I N C 1 - C 3 S E G M E N T S B E T T E R T H A N C E R V I C O T H O R A C I C B R A C E .  AT L A N T O A X I A L I N S TA B I L I T Y ( R A ) .  N E U R A L A R C H F R A C T U R E S O F C 2 ( F L E X I O N C A U S E S I N S TA B I L I T Y ) .
  • 51. (F-E-R) SOMI COLLAR F-E-R control orthosis (sterno-occipital mandibular immobilizer): The mandibular support can be removed and the patient can eat, wash, or shave while supine
  • 52. MOTION RESTRICTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE SOMI INCLUDE  Cervical flexion and extension are limited by 70%-75%  Lateral bending is limited by 35%  Rotation is limited by 60-65%
  • 53. CERVICAL FELR CONTROL ORTHOSIS  Four Posters  Cuirass  Yale  Minerva  Halo
  • 54. Four-Poster The four-poster is a rigid cervical orthosis with anterior and posterior sections consisting of pads that lie on the chest and are connected by leather straps.
  • 55. 4 POSTERS CERVICAL ORTHOSIS Mandibular support Occipital support Double anterior uprights Double posterior uprights Sternal Plate Interscapular Plate
  • 56. MOTION RESTRICTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE 4-POSTER ORTHOSIS  Flexion and extension are limited by 80%.  Lateral bending is limited by 55%-80%.  Rotation is limited by 70%.
  • 57. Yale  The Yale orthosis consists of chin and occipital pieces that extend higher on the skull in the posterior region; this increases comfort.  The Yale orthosis is a modified Philadelphia collar with a thoracic extension.  The extension consists of fiberglass that extends both anteriorly and posteriorly, and has thoracic straps that hold the sections together.  The thoracic extension to the orthosis helps to stabilize injuries at the vertebral levels of C6-T2
  • 60. The Minerva collar has head straps to provide additional support and to keep head immobilized throughout ttt.
  • 61.
  • 62. • The halo orthosis provides flexion, extension, and rotational control of the cervical region. • Pressure systems are used for control of motion, as well as to provide slight distraction for immobilization of the cervical spine.
  • 63. • This orthosis provides maximum restriction in motion of all the cervical orthoses. It is the most stable orthosis, especially in the superior cervical spine segment. • A halo is used for approximately 3 months (10 to 12 weeks) to ensure healing of a fracture or of a spinal fusion. • Usually a cervical collar is indicated after the halo is removed, because the muscles and ligaments supporting the head become weak after disuse. • All pins on the halo ring should be checked to ensure tightness 24 to 48 hours after application.
  • 64. Indications • Dens type I, II, or III fractures of C2 . • C1 fractures with rupture of the transverse ligament • Atlantoaxial instability from RA, with ligamentous disruption and erosion of the dens. • C2 neural arch fractures and disc disruption between C2 and C3. Bony, single-column cervical fractures • Cervical arthrodesis - Postoperative • Cervical tumor resection in an unstable spine - Postoperative • Debridement and drainage of infection in an unstable spine - Postoperative • Spinal cord injury (SCI)
  • 65. Contraindications • Concomitant skull fracture with cervical injury • Damaged or infected skin over pin insertion sites Relative contraindications • Cervical instability with ligamentous disruption • Cervical instability with 2- or 3-column injury • Cervical instability with rotational injury involving facet joints
  • 66. Complications • Neck pain or stiffness - 80% • Pin loosening - 60% • Pin site infection - 22% • Scarring - 30% • Pain at pin sites - 18% • Pressure sores - 11% • Redislocation - 10% • Restricted ventilation - 8% • Dysphagia - 2% • Nerve injury - 2% • Dural puncture - 1% • Neurological deterioration - 1% • Avascular necrosis of the dens • Ring migration • Inadequate bony healing • Inadequate ligamentous healing
  • 67. Complications of cervical orthosis: extremely mobile joint complex with multiple planes little body surface available for contact high incidence of skin breakdown (occiput, chin) pressure-related pain common (clavicles, chin) hygiene issues limit comfort (shaving) The soft-tissue structures around the neck (eg, blood vessels, esophagus, trachea) limit the application of aggressive external force. Cervical orthosis offer no control for the head or thorax; therefore, motion restriction is minimal. (Cervical orthosis serve as a kinesthetic reminder to limit neck movement.)
  • 68.
  • 69.  All orthotics tend to control flexion better than extension  Limitation of flexion at C1-C3 Halo > 4-poster > CTO  CTO are best at controlling flexion and extension at C3-T1  SOMI brace is best at controlling flexion from C1-C5  SOMI is less effective in controlling extension  Limitation of rotation and lateral bending C1-C3 Halo > cervico-thoracic brace Cervical Immobilization Pearls
  • 70.
  • 71.
  • 72.  Extends from sacrum to above the inferior angle of scapula  Contain thoracic and pelvic bands  Used to support and stabilize the trunk  Used in cases of truncal paralysis, post-spinal fusion, post- scoliotic surgery  To prevent mild scoliosis 20-45º  Work through increase intra-abdominal pressure and reduce weight on vertebral body  Used in intervertebral disc diseases TLS Orthoses
  • 73. a.The TLS F-E control orthosis (Taylor brace) b.The TLS F-E-L control (Knight Taylor brace) c.The TLS F-E-R control orthosis (Cowhorn brace) d.The TLS flexion (F) control orthosis  Jewett or Becher TLSO  Cruciform anterior spinal hyper- extension (CASH) TLSO e. The TLS F-E-L-R control (TLS jacket) f. Boston TLSO Extends from sacrum to above the inferior angle of scapula
  • 74.
  • 76. Knight-Taylor brace  Has two lateral and two posterior uprights and shoulder straps.  Reduce lateral bending, flexion, and extension.  The brace can be prefabricated and made with polyvinyl chloride or aluminum.  The posterior portion of the brace has added cross supports below the inferior angle of the scapula and a pelvic band fitted at the sacrococcygeal junction.  The anterior corset is made of canvas and provides intracavitary pressure.  The anterior corset is laced to the lateral uprights.
  • 77. Indication:  To provide flexion immobilization to treat thoracic and lumbar vertebral body fractures.  Post-surgical support (for years) of traumatic fractures, spondylolisthesis, scoliosis, spinal stenosis, herniated disks, and disk infections.  However, clinicians typically now prefer the custom- molded TLSO body jackets, because better control of position is obtained
  • 78. Motion restrictions: control of flexion, extension, and a minimal axial rotation via the three-point pressure systems for each direction of motion. For e.g, flexion is controlled by: the posteriorly directed forces applied through the axillary straps and the abdominal apron, and an anteriorly directed force through the paraspinal uprights.
  • 79.  Knight-Taylor has an additional thoracic band that extends from the uprights just below the inferior angle of the scapula to the midsagittal plane, and a lateral upright on each side that connects the pelvic band and the thoracic band.  These bands provide additional lateral support and motion control to the trunk.
  • 80.
  • 81.
  • 82. Jewett hyperextension brace  uses a 3-point pressure system with 1 posterior and 2 anterior pads.  The anterior pads place pressure over the sternum and pubic symphysis.  The posterior pad places opposing pressure in the mid-thoracic region.  The posterior pad keeps the spine in an extended position
  • 83.  Lightweight design that is more comfortable than the CASH brace.  Pelvic and sternal pads can be adjusted from the lateral axillary bar where they attach.  No abdominal support is provided with this device.  When the patient is seated, the sternal pad should be half an inch inferior to the sternal notch, and the pubic pad should be half an inch superior to the pubic symphysis.
  • 84. Indication  Symptomatic relief of stable spinal fractures T6 to L1 not due to osteoporosis  Immobilization after surgical stabilization of thoraco- lumbar fractures  Postural Kyphosis. Advantage  Prevents flexion & limits extension of spine  Controls thoracic spine  Does not prevent extension  More comfortable on women  Velcro closure
  • 85. Contraindication:  Three column spine fractures involving anterior, middle, and posterior spinal structures  Compression fractures above T6 since segmental motion increases above the sternal pad  Compression fractures due to osteoporosis More effective than the CASH brace.
  • 86. The TLS flextion (F) control orthosis Cruciform anterior spinal hyperextension brace with round anterior chest pads. (CASH)
  • 87. Indication  Immobilization of compression fracture of vertebral bodies from T6 to L1  Reduction of kyphosis not in patients with osteoporosis Advantage  Prevents flexion of spine  Controls thoracic spine  Does not prevent extension  More comfortable on women  Velcro closure CASH Orthosis
  • 88. Motion restrictions : Limits flexion from T6-L1 Contraindications : Three-column spine fractures involving anterior, middle, and posterior spinal structures . Compression fractures due to osteoporosis
  • 89. Custom-molded plastic body jacket (calmshell)
  • 90. PLASTIC BODY JACKET •Fabricated with high-temperature co- polymer plastics. • Well-fitted body jacket restrict motion in all planes. •Anterior and lateral trunk containment elevate intracavitary pressure. •Decrease demands on the vertebral discs. • Body jackets are frequently used post surgically or during an acute trauma. (flexion-extension-lateral –rotary control)
  • 91.  Lightweight design and is easy to don and doff.  Material is easy to clean and comfortable to wear.  The TLSO provides efficient force transmission as pressure is distributed over wide surface area, which is ideal for use in patients with neurologic injuries.  Use it with an undershirt to absorb perspiration and protect the skin.  Frequent checks to ensure proper fit help prevent pressure ulcers.  Velcro straps are used to tighten the brace.
  • 92. Indications  Immobilization for compression fractures from osteoporosis  Immobilization after surgical stabilization for spinal fractures  Bracing for idiopathic scoliosis  Immobilization for unstable spinal disorders for T3 to L3
  • 93. Motion restrictions custom-molded TLSO Limits side-bending , flexion ,extension and rotation to some extent  It is more effective in preventing idiopathic scoliosis curve progression than the Milwaukee and Charleston braces.  The mean curve progression with TLSO is less than 2° while the Charleston and Milwaukee braces have a curve progression greater than 6°.  Fewer than 18% of patients treated with TLSO brace required surgery for scoliosis compared to 23% for patients treated with a Milwaukee brace.
  • 94.  Plastic TLS jacket that extend upward to the mandible and mastoid.  The Milwaukee brace, (CTLSO) used for scoliosis has a rigid plastic pelvic girdle connected to a neck ring over the upper thorax by one anterior and two posterior uprights.  Pads strapped to the uprights apply forces to correct the scoliotic curve.  It is used for curves at or below T6
  • 95. Cow horn spinal orthosis
  • 96.
  • 97. Extend from sacrum to the inferior scapular angle a.The LSO (F-E) control orthosis (Chairback orthosis) b.The LSO (F-E-L) control othosis (Knight spinal) c.The LSO (E-L) contorl orthosis (Williams brace) d.The LSO with hip spica or thigh cuff e.The LS jacket (Boston overlap brace)
  • 98.
  • 99. Rigid short LSO with 2 posterior uprights with thoracic and pelvic bands.  The abdominal apron has straps in front for adjustment to increase intra-cavitary pressure. The thoracic band is located 1 inch below the inferior angle of scapula. Chairback brace
  • 100. The thoracic band extends laterally to the mid-axillary line, and the pelvic band extends laterally to the mid- trochanteric line. Position the posterior uprights over the paraspinal muscles. Uprights can be made from metal or plastic.  The brace uses a 3-point pressure system and can be custom molded to improve the fit for each individual patient.
  • 101. Indications :  Unloading of the intervertebral discs and transmit pressure to soft tissue areas  Relief for LBP  Immobilization after lumbar laminectomy  Kinesthetic reminder to patient following surgery Motion restrictions :  Limits flexion and extension at the L1-L4 level  Limits rotation minimally  Limits lateral bending by 45% in the thoracolumbar spine
  • 102. Chairback Ortho-Mold brace  Similar to the chairback brace, but it has a rigid plastic back piece custom molded to the patient.  The plastic back can be inserted into the canvas and elastic corset.  Indications for use are the same as the chairback brace.
  • 103. Williams brace  Short LSO with an anterior elastic apron to allow for forward flexion.  Lateral uprights attach to the thoracic band, and oblique bars are used to connect the pelvic band to the lateral uprights.  The abdominal apron is laced to the lateral uprights.  The brace limits extension and lateral trunk movement but allows forward flexion.  The brace is indicated to provide motion restriction during extension to treat spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis.
  • 104. Contraindication :  in spinal compression fractures. Motion restrictions of the Williams brace include the following:  Limits extension  Limits side bending at terminal ends only
  • 105.  A custom-made orthosis molded over the iliac crest for improved fit.  Plastic anterior and posterior shells overlap for a tight fit.  Velcro closure in the front is designed for easy donning and doffing.  Multiple holes can be made for aeration to help decrease moisture and limit skin maceration.  The rigid LSO can be trimmed easily to make adjustments for patient comfort and may be used in the shower if needed. Rigid LSO
  • 106. Indications:  Post-surgical lumbar immobilization.  Treatment of lumbar compression #. Motion restrictions:  Limits flexion and extension  Limits some rotation and side bending
  • 107.  uses a thigh piece on the symptomatic side and extends to 5 cm above the patella.  The hip is held in 20° of flexion to allow sitting and walking.  Some patients require a cane for ambulation after application. Indications  Immobilization to treat lumbar instability from L3-S1  Immobilization after LS fusion with anchoring to the sacrum Motion restrictions  Limits flexion and extension  Limits some rotation and side bending Rigid LSO with hip spica
  • 108. Corsets (Flexible Spinal Orthoses)  Made of fabric with pouches for vertical stays  No thoracic or pelvic bands  The vertical stays are made of plastic or rigid steel  Create similar forces as rigid SO  Do NOT restrict movement or spinal re-alignment  Increase intra-abdominal pressure more than rigid SO  Used in direct contact with skin
  • 109.  Has metal bars within the cloth material posteriorly that can be removed and adjusted to fit the patient.  The anterior abdominal apron has pull-up laces from the back to tighten. The abdominal apron can come with Velcro closure for easy donning and doffing.  It has a lightweight design and is comfortable to wear.  The corset increases intracavitary pressure. Anteriorly, the brace covers the area between the xiphoid process and pubic symphysis.  Posteriorly, the brace covers the area between the lower scapula and gluteal fold. The Standard LSO corset
  • 110. Indications:  Treatment of LBP  Immobilization after lumbar laminectomy Motion restrictions: limitation of F-E.
  • 111. The TLS corset:  Restrict spinal motion at thoracic and lumber spine  Increase intra-abdominal pressure to remove load from vertebrae  Remind the wearer to avoid abrupt trunk motion and to lift properly The LS corset (Richard’s corset)  It extends to below the inferior angles of the scapulae instead of the midscapular level  Same function as TLS corset but does not restrict thoracic spinal motion
  • 112.
  • 113. Sacroiliac (SI) Corsets a.Sacroiliac corset :  from illiac crest to symphysis pubis  Used in low back pain and stabilization of sacroilliac joint b. Sacroiliac belt :  Encircle the pelvis between the illiac crests  The belt passes below the anterior superior pelvic spine  Used in post surgical conditions of pelvis c.Elastic sacroiliac corset (binder) with plastic insert:  Similar to the corset  Mainly used to correct back posture and low back pain
  • 114.
  • 115.
  • 116. The main goal:  prevent further deformity  Prevent or delay need for surgery.  If surgery is needed, delaying the procedure as long as possible helps optimize spinal height and avoid stunting of truncal growth.  Assessing the degree of skeletal maturity in a child with scoliosis is important because with more advanced skeletal maturity, you expect less further skeletal growth and thus less progression of the scoliosis.  This has obvious implications when forming a treatment plan.
  • 117. Risser classification of ossification of the iliac epiphysis: Used to evaluate skeletal immaturity. • Ossification of the iliac crest occurs from ASIS to PSIS. • When ossification is complete, fusion of the epiphysis occurs to the iliac crest. • Risser staging is based on using radiographs to determine what % of the excursion (along the length of the iliac epiphysis) has ossified. • Risser score of 0-I with a curve of 20-30° indicates nearly 70% chance of progression.
  • 118. Risser stages are defined as follows: Stage 0 = 0% excursion Stage I = 25% excursion Stage II = 50% excursion Stage III = 75% excursion Stage IV = 100% excursion and correlates with end of spinal growth Stage V = fusion to ilium, indicating cessation of vertical height growth The younger the age, the larger the curve, the shorter the duration of curve progress and the more the liability to surgery.
  • 119.  The most common time to lose control of idiopathic curves is at puberty.  Boys tend to show less curve progression than girls, and tend to have later onset of curve progression between 15-18 years.  Younger patients show greater initial in-brace correction.  Curve correction with bracing >50 degrees is expected to have final net correction, whereas curve correction < 50 is expected to have limited progression.  Generally, curves between T8-L2 have the best correction.  Young patients with large curves usually fail treatment with a brace.
  • 120.
  • 121. Biomechanics: • It is used for scoliosis management. • It provides control of flexion, extension, and lateral bending of the cervical, thoracic, and lumber spine. • It also provides some rotational control of thoracic & lumbar spine. • Pressure systems are used for control of motion, as well as to provide correction for the spine. • It is a good choice for patients who need correction in the higher thoracic region of the spine.
  • 122. Design and Fabrication: The Milwaukee is custom made, consisting of a cervical portion with the option of a removable cervical ring. Also used is the thoracolumbar section of the orthosis in which the correction of the lower thoracic and lumbar spines is achieved.
  • 123.  Uprights have localized pads to apply transverse force, which is effective for small curves.  The main corrective force is the thoracic pad, which attaches to the 2 posterior uprights and 1 anterior upright. The lumbar pads play a passive role compared to the thoracic pads.  The uprights are perpendicular to the pelvic section  Any leg-length discrepancy should be corrected.  The neck ring is another corrective force and is designed to give longitudinal traction.  Jaw deformity is a potential complication of the neck ring. The throat mold, instead of a mandibular mold, allows use of distractive force without jaw deformity.
  • 124. During the child's growth, brace length can be adjusted. Pads also can be changed to compensate for spinal growth. The brace needs to be changed if pelvic size increases.
  • 125. Indications • Patients with a Risser score of I-II, as well as a curve > 20-30° and that progresses by 5° over 1 year • Curves of 30-40°, but not curves < 20°. • Curves of 20-30°, with no year-over-year progression, require observation every 4-6 months. • The Milwaukee brace is used for curves with apex above T7.
  • 126. The Milwaukee brace's duration of use: • Daily use ranges from 16-23 hr/ day. • Treatment should continue until the patient is at Risser stage IV or V. • If the curve is > 30°, consider continued use of the brace for 1-2 years after maturity, because a curve of this magnitude is at risk of progression.
  • 127. Advantages • It may remove for activities of daily living. • Because its open design, there is minimal restriction of respiration. • It allows good air circulation to minimize skin problems. • It is adjustable to growth and curve changes. • Because it has cervical ring we could use it for high level curve deformity.
  • 128. Problems associated with the use of a Milwaukee brace: • Jaw deformity • Pain • Skin breakdown • Unsightly appearance • Difficulty with mobility • Difficulty with transfers • Increased energy expenditure with ambulation
  • 130.  Is a prefabricated symmetric thoracolumbar- pelvic mold with built-in lumbar flexion that can be worn under clothes.  Lumbar flexion is achieved through posterior flattening of the brace and extending of the mold distally to the buttock.  Braces with superstructures have a curve apex above T7.  Curves with an apex at or below T7 do not require superstructures to immobilize cervical spine movement.  Unlike the Milwaukee brace, cannot be adjusted if the patient grows in height.
  • 131. Indications for the use of a Boston brace • A curve of 20-25° with 10° progression over 1 year • A curve of 25-30° with 5° progression over 1 year • Skeletally immature patients with a curve of ≥ 30°.
  • 132. ADVANTAGES • The Boston brace, in contrast to the Milwaukee brace are low profile (underarm) an can be worn under clothing. • The Boston brace fabrication is quicker than Milwaukee brace. • Three-point pressure application in The Boston brace.
  • 133. Problems that are associated with the use of a Boston brace • Local discomfort • Hip flexion contracture • Trunk weakness • Increased abdominal pressure • Skin breakdown • Accentuation of hypokyphosis in the thoracic spine, above the brace (contraindication).
  • 134. Duration of Boston brace use is determined by several factors:  Daily use ranges from 16-23 hours per day.  Treatment should continue until the patient is at Risser stage IV or V.  If the curve is greater than 30°, consider continued use for 1-2 years after maturity since these curves are at risk for progression.  The Boston brace with and without superstructure is equally effective in treating curves below T7.
  • 135. CHARLESTON BENDING BRACE Is a nocturnal only treatment.
  • 136. CHARLESTON BENDING BRACE (1979)  It is worn only at night, which is why it's also known as a "part-time" brace  The Charleston Bending Brace is molded while he or she is bent towards the convexity—or outward bulge—of the curve, the concept behind this design being that it "over-corrects" the curve during the eight hours the brace is worn. For 20-35 degrees & apex of the curve below the level of the shoulder blade.