2. Chapter ObjectivesChapter Objectives
• To review key elements and issues that corporate strategycorporate strategy
addresses:addresses:
Orientation toward growth (Directional Strategy)Orientation toward growth (Directional Strategy)
Coordination of cash among units (Portfolio Analysis)Coordination of cash among units (Portfolio Analysis)
Building synergies among units through resource sharingBuilding synergies among units through resource sharing
(Corporate Parenting)(Corporate Parenting)
• To discuss the trade-offs between internally and externally-
generated growth strategies and how these influence the
success of international expansion efforts.
3. Directional StrategiesDirectional Strategies
• How does a company determine what its directional strategy should
be?
• Three key questions for management:
1. Should we expand, cut back, or continue with our operations as
they currently are?
2. Should we concentrate on our current activities or diversify?
3. If we want to expand (domestically or internationally), should we
develop through internal or external methods?
Acquisitions
Mergers
Strategic alliances
5. Concentration Strategies:
• Vertical Integration: backward & forward options
Full integration
Taper integration
Quasi-integration
Captive companies
• Horizontal Integration: The degree to which a firm operates in multiple geographic
locations at the same point in a value chain (full/partial ownership or l.t. contracts).
Diversification Strategies:
• Concentric: growth into related industry
Leverage product knowledge, manufacturing ability, marketing skills built in
current industry.
Goal is to take advantage of synergies.
Can use internal or external means.
• Conglomerate: Primary concerns are financial, smoothing seasonal cash flows.
Current industry is unattractive
Firms lacks skills that would be easily transferable to related industry
Directional Strategies: GrowthDirectional Strategies: Growth
International entry options include: exporting, licensing, jv’s, acquisitions, greenfield
development, production sharing, turnkey operations, BOT operations, management contracts.
6. Directional Strategies: StabilityDirectional Strategies: Stability
Pause/Proceed with Caution:
• A “time-out”
• Management deliberately decides to wait until a situation is resolved or its
environment changes.
No Change:
• Decision to do nothing, make no changes to operations, policies.
• Often is not a conscious decision, but rather a strategy by default because of
the stability of a firm’s industry and low market growth prospects.
• Firm expects little new competition.
Profit Strategy:
• Decision to do nothing in a worsening situation & act as if problems are
temporary.
• Artificially support profits by reducing investments & s.t. expenditures.
• Used to get firm through temporary, difficult period.
• Can become seductive & leave firm in worse position.
Stability strategies are popular with successful companies operating in predictable environments,
specifically those in niche markets (I.e. family businesses). Can be useful short-term.
7. Directional Strategies: RetrenchmentDirectional Strategies: Retrenchment
Turnaround:
• Focus on improvement of operational efficiency. Two phases:
Contraction: Initial effort to “stop the bleeding” with general, across-the-board
cutbacks in size & cost.
Consolidation: Implementation of a program to stabilize the “leaner” firm.
Critical phase – threat of loss of best employees.
See p. 149 for IBM’s 1990s turnaround strategy.
Captive Company: Giving up independence in exchange for security of captive customer.
Sell-out/Divestment:
• Sell-out: Leave industry entirely. A good option if firm can attract good value.
• Divestment: Sell division with low growth potential, other problems.
Bankruptcy/Liquidation:
• Bankruptcy: Giving management control to courts to settle financial obligations.
Often leaves firms stronger and able to compete in focused industry.
• Liquidation: Termination of a firm by converting saleable assets to cash to be
distributed to shareholders after lenders.
Pursued when a company has weak competitive position in some or all of its businesses- lower
sales and profitability.
8. Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio Analysis
The process top management must undertake to determine how various product lines
and business units should be managed for the best performance levels.
***************************************
• To view a firm’s businesses through a financial screen, regarding business unitsTo view a firm’s businesses through a financial screen, regarding business units
and products as separate and individual investments.and products as separate and individual investments.
• Corporate HQ plays role of internal banker.Corporate HQ plays role of internal banker.
• Corporate HQ reviews each business unit/product line to determine expectedCorporate HQ reviews each business unit/product line to determine expected
returns.returns.
Business units and divisions are juggled for overall profit maximization.Business units and divisions are juggled for overall profit maximization.
They are usually assigned “roles” in the portfolioThey are usually assigned “roles” in the portfolio
• Two popular approaches:Two popular approaches:
BCG Growth-Share MatrixBCG Growth-Share Matrix
GE Business ScreenGE Business Screen
9. BCG Growth-Share MatrixBCG Growth-Share Matrix
Stars Question Marks
Cash Cows Dogs
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
10x
4x
2x
1.5x
1x
0.5x
0.4x
0.3x
0.2x
0.1x
Relative Competitive Position
(firm’s market share/share of largest competitor)
IndustryGrowthRate
(Percent)
Drawbacks
• Assumes market share is key
to high profitability.
• Too simplistic.
• Focus only on industry growth
and market share.
• Ignores all but market leader.
10. General Electric’s Business ScreenGeneral Electric’s Business Screen
A
Winners Winners
B
C
Question
Marks
D
F
Average
Businesses
E
Winners
Losers
G
Losers
H
Losers
Profit
Producers
Strong Average Weak
Low
Medium
High
Business Strength/Competitive Position
IndustryAttractiveness
Industry Attractiveness
• Market growth rate
• Industry profitability
• Size
• Pricing practices
Bus. Strength/Comp. Position
• Market share
• Technological position
• Profitability
• Size
Drawbacks
• Complicated, cumbersome
• Subjective judgments appear to
be objective b/c of numbers
assigned
• Cannot incorporate positions of
new products/businesses in
developing industries
11. International Portfolio AnalysisInternational Portfolio Analysis
Harvest/Divest
Combine/License
Invest/Grow Dominate/Divest
Joint Venture
LowHigh
High Low
Competitive Strengths
CountryAttractiveness
Selective
Strategies
Country Attractiveness
• Market size
• Market growth rate
• Gov’t regulation
• Econ/political factors
Product Competitive Strengths
• Market share
• Product fit
• Contribution margin
• Market support
12. Portfolio Analysis: Advantages & LimitationsPortfolio Analysis: Advantages & Limitations
Advantages:
• Encourages HQ mgmt. to evaluate each business unit individually, setting
objectives and allocating resources for each.
• Stimulates the use of externally-oriented data to supplement mgmt’s
judgment.
• Raises issue of cash flow availability to expansion and growth uses.
• Facilitates communication (graphic nature)
Limitations:
• May be difficult to define product and market segments.
• Suggests the use of standard strategies that may not be relevant.
• Inputs and results may appear to be objective.
• Value-laden terms may be self-fulfilling prophecies.
• No clarity in what makes an industry attractive or where product is in life
cycle.
• Does not obviate the need for all levels of mgmt to use market and product
knowledge and not blindly accept results of such analyses.
13. Corporate ParentingCorporate Parenting
• Views the corporation in terms of resources and capabilities that can be used to
build business unit value as well as to generate synergies across business units.
• Two questions HQ management must address:
1. What businesses should this company own and why?
2. What organizational structure, management processes, and philosophy will
foster superior performance in and across business units?
• Focus is on core competencies of the parent and synergies of relationship between
parent and subsidiaries.
Parent’s role is to obtain synergies among business units by:
Providing necessary resources to units
Transferring skills/capabilities among units
Coordinating share unit functions to achieve economies of scope
• Useful for:
Deciding on new businesses to acquire.
How to manage each existing business unit.
14. Corporate ParentingCorporate Parenting
• To determine appropriate corporate strategy, Parco follows three steps:
1. Examine each business unit (or acquisition target) in terms of its critical
success factors.
• Elements of a company that determine success or failure
• Emphasize distinctive competences/competitive advantage
2. Examine each business unit (or acquisition target) in terms of areas in which
performance can be improved. Because of objectivity, HQ may be able to spot
such areas better than business unit mgmt.
• Opportunities for economies of scope (in functional area)
• Transfer or parent skill to business units
• Transfer of human resources among business units
3. Analyze how well Parco fits with business unit/acquisition target
• Parco must know own strengths & weaknesses
• Must also be able to determine misfits with business units/targets
15. Parenting-Fit MatrixParenting-Fit Matrix
Edge of
Heartland
Heartland
Alien
Territory
Low
High
HighLow
FIT between parenting opportunities
and parenting characteristics
MISFITbetweencriticalsuccessfactors
andparentingcharacteristics
Ballast
Value Trap
Emphasizes businesses’ fit with Parco in terms of positive or negative Parco contributions.
16. ConclusionsConclusions
Top management must continually scan the internal and external
environments to create and maintain the best composition of business
units and product/service lines as well as the most appropriate
individual strategies for those businesses.
This ensures that the firm creates and manages an overall strategy that
best utilizes the firm’s resources and maximizes shareholder value.