SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 109
CHAPTER 4
DATA ANALYSIS
AND
INTERPRETATION
DATA ANALYSIS & INTTERPRETATION
The Balance Sheets which were collected from the organization for the last five
years were the main source of data. The data was classified and tabulated for the
purpose of analysis using ratio analysis and comparative analysis of balance sheet
and percentage were drawn for the purpose of information generation and
inferences were drawn.
A. LIQUIDITY RATIOS
1. Current Ratio: A liquidity ratio that measures a company's ability to pay short-
term obligations. Current Ratio = Current Asset
Current Liabilities
TABLE 4.1: CURRENT RATIOS
(RS.IN CRORES)
YEARS CURRENT
ASSETS
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
RATIOS
2011 20098.44 223219.93 0.09
2010 15776.69 184738.06 0.08
2009 15984.93 152235.16 0.10
2008 10097.84 116725.57 0.08
2007 8426.44 97488.01 0.08
ANALYSIS:
The table above shows that in the year 2011 Current Ratio was 0.09 while in 2010
it was 0.12 whereas in 2009 was 0.10 while for the year 2008 was 0.08 whereas in
2007 Current Ratio was 0.08.
GRAPH 4.1: CURRENT RATIOS
INFERENCE:
From the above graph it can be seen that in the year 2007 Current Ratio was 0.08
whereas in 2008 it remained constant to 0.09 while in 2009 it increased to 0.10
which is the highest whereas in 2010 it decreased to 0.08 which is the lowest while
in 2010 it increased to 0.09.
EARNINGS PER SHARE: The portion of a company's profit allocated to each
outstanding share of common stock. Earnings per share serve as an indicator of a
company's profitability. EPS = Net Profit after Tax
No of Equity Shares
TABLE 4.2: EARNING PER SHARE
(RS.IN CRORES)
YEARS PROFIT AFTER
TAX
NO OF EQUITY
SHARES
RATIOS
2011 2081.95 524699068 39.67
2010 2074.92 505294547 41.06
2009 1726.55 505324751 34.17
2008 1387.03 505228404 27.45
2007 845.39 505340501 16.72
ANALYSIS:
The table above shows that in the year 2011 EPS was 39.67 while in 2010 it was
21.06 whereas in 2009 was 34.17 while for the year 2008 was 27.45 whereas in
2007 EPS was 16.72.
GRAPH 4.2: EARNING PER SHARE
INFERENCE:
The earnings per share ratio is seen to be increasing from the year 2007 to 2010
which shows the company‘s efficiency of paying dividends to its shareholders
while in 2011 it has again decreased. The ratio simply denotes the profit left with
the firm after tax and amount paid against each share. The higher result denotes the
higher amount paid against each share to the shareholders.The graph shows the
good condition of the EPS and is satisfactory
B. MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY RATIOS:
1. Interest Income to Total funds: The difference between the revenue that is
generated from a bank's assets and the expenses associated with paying out its
liabilities.
Interest Income to Total funds = Interest Earned
Total Funds
TABLE 4.3: INTEREST INCOME TO TOTAL FUNDS
(RS.IN CRORES)
YEARS INTEREST
EARNED
TOTAL FUNDS RATIOS (%)
2011 16452.62 235984.45 6.97
2010 13302.68 195161.84 6.82
2009 11889.38 160975.52 7.38
2008 9447.30 124073.28 7.61
2007 7382.18 102677.88 7.18
ANALYSIS:
The table above shows that in the year 2011 the Ratio was 6.97% while in 2010 it
was 6.82% whereas in 2009 was 7.38% while for the year 2008 was 7.61%
whereas in 2007 Ratio was 7.18%.
GRAPH 4.3: INTEREST INCOME TO TOTAL FUNDS
INFERENCE:
From the above graph it can be seen that in the year 2007 Interest Income to Total
Funds was 7.18% whereas in 2008 it was the highest with 7.61% while in 2009 it f
decreased to 7.38% whereas in 2010 it further decreased to 6.82% which is the
lowest while in 2011 it increased to 6.97%.
2. Operating Expense to Total Funds: A measure of a company's earning power
from ongoing operations, equal to earnings before deduction of interest payments
and income taxes. Also called EBIT or operating income.
Operating Expense to Total Funds = Operating Expense
Total Funds
TABLE 4.4: OPERATING EXPENSE TO TOTAL FUNDS
(RS.IN CRORES)
YEARS OPERATING
EXPENSE
TOTAL FUNDS RATIOS (%)
2011 5137.69 235984.45 2.17
2010 3206.76 195161.84 1.64
2009 2760.59 160975.52 1.71
2008 2178.20 124073.28 1.02
2007 1805.92 102677.88 1.76
ANALYSIS:
The table above shows that in the year 2011 the Ratio was 2.17% while in 2010 it
was 1.64% whereas in 2009 was 1.71% while for the year 2008 was 1.02%
whereas in 2007 Ratio was 1.76%.
GRAPH 4.4: OPERATING EXPENSE TO TOTAL FUNDS
INFERENCE:
From the above graph it can be seen that in the year 2007 Operating Expense to
Total Funds was 1.76% whereas in 2008 it decreased to 1.02% which is the lowest
while in 2009 it increased to 1.71% whereas in 20010 it again decreased to 1.64%
while in 2011 it was the highest with 2.17%.
3. Net Profit to Total funds: An indicator of how profitable a company is relative
to its total assets. Net profit to total funds gives an idea as to how efficient
management is at using its assets to generate earnings. Calculated by dividing a
company's annual earnings by its total assets, Net profit to total funds is displayed
as a percentage. Sometimes this is referred to as "return on investment".
Net Profit to Total funds = Net Profit
Total Funds
TABLE 4.5: NET PROFIT TO TOTAL FUNDS
(RS.IN CRORES)
YEARS NET PROFIT TOTAL FUNDS RATIOS (%)
2011 2081.95 235984.45 0.88
2010 2074.92 195161.84 1.06
2009 1726.55 160975.52 1.07
2008 1387.03 124073.28 1.11
2007 845.39 102677.88 0.82
ANALYSIS:
The table above shows that in the year 2011the Ratio was 0.88% while in 2010 it
was 1.06% whereas in 2009 it was 1.07% while for the year 2008 it was 1.11%
whereas in 2007 Ratio was 0.82%.
GRAPH 4.5: NET PROFIT TO TOTAL FUNDS
INFERENCE:
From the above graph it can be seen that in the year 2007 Net Profit to Total Funds
was the lowest with 0.82% whereas in 2008 it increased to 1.11% which is the
highest while in 2009 it decreased to 1.07% whereas in 2010 it further decreased to
1.06% while in 2011 it decreased to 0.88%.
C. PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT RATIOS
1. Interest Expanded to Interest earned: Interest earned is the interest generated
but not yet credited or paid and Interest expanded is the interest provided to the
creditors.
Interest Expanded to Interest Earned = Interest Expanded
Interest Earned
TABLE 4.6: INTEREST EXPANDED TO INTEREST EARNED
(RS. IN CRORES)
YEARS INTEREST
EXPANDED
INTEREST
EARNED
RATIOS (%)
2011 10236.42 16452.62 62.21
2010 9110.27 13302.68 68.48
2009 8075.81 11889.38 67.92
2008 6360.95 9447.30 67.33
2007 4591.96 7382.18 62.20
ANALYSIS:
The table above shows that in the year 2011 the Ratio was 62.21% while in 2010 it
was 68.48% whereas in 2009 it was 67.92% while for the year 2008 it was 67.33%
whereas in 2007 Ratio was 62.20%.
GRAPH 4.6: INTEREST EXPANDED TO INTEREST EARNED
INFERENCE:
From the above graph it can be seen that in the year 2007 the Interest expanded to
interest earned was 62.22% whereas in 2008 it increased to 67.33% while in 2009
it further increased to 67.92% whereas in 2010 it again increased to 68.48% which
is the highest while in 2011 it was the lowest with 62.21%.
2. Operating Expense to Total Income: A category of expenditure that a business
incurs as a result of performing its normal business operations.
Operating Expense to Total Income = Operating Expense
Total income
TABLE 4.7: OPERATING EXPENSE TO TOTAL INCOME
(RS.IN CRORES)
YEARS OPERATING
EXPENSE
TOTAL
INCOME
RATIOS (%)
2011 5137.69 18491.40 27.78
2010 3206.76 15277.42 20.99
2009 2760.59 13371.93 20.64
2008 2178.20 10679.97 20.39
2007 1805.92 8223.98 21.95
ANALYSIS:
The table above shows that in the year 2011 the Ratio was 27.78% while in 2010 it
was 20.99% whereas in 2009 was 20.64% while for the year 2008 was 20.39%
whereas in 2007 Ratio was 21.95%.
GRAPH 4.7: OPERATING EXPENSE TO TOTAL INCOME
INFERENCE:
From the above graph it can be seen that in the year 2007 the Operating expense to
total income was 21.95% whereas in 2008 it decreased to 20.39% which is the
lowest while in 2009 it increased to 20.64% whereas in 2010 it further increased to
20.99% while in 2011 it increased to the highest with 27.78%.
D. PROFITABILITY RATIOS
1. Net Profit Margin: A ratio of profitability calculated as net income divided by
revenues, or net profits divided by sales.
Net Profit Margin = Net Profit
Total Income
TABLE 4.8: NET PROFIT MARGIN
(RS.IN CRORES)
YEARS NET PROFIT TOTAL
INCOME
RATIOS (%)
2011 2081.95 18491.40 11.25
2010 2074.92 15277.42 13.58
2009 1726.55 13371.93 12.91
2008 1387.03 10679.97 12.98
2007 845.39 8223.98 10.27
ANALYSIS:
The table above shows that in the year 2011 Net Profit Margin was 11.25% while
in 2010 it was 13.58% whereas in 2009 was 12.91% while for the year 2008 was
12.98% whereas in 2007 Net Profit Margin was 10.27%.
GRAPH 4.8: NET PROFIT MARGIN
INFERENCE:
From the above graph it can be seen in the year 2007 Net Profit Margin was
10.27% which is the lowest whereas in 2008 it increased to 12.98% while in 2009
it decreased to 12.91% whereas in 2010 it reached to the highest with 13.58%
while in 2011 it again decreased to 11.25%.
2. Return on Net worth: Ratio of net income after taxes to total end of the year
Net Worth. This ratio indicates the return on stockholder's total equity.
Return on Net worth = Net Profit
Net worth
TABLE 4.9: RETURN ON NET WORTH
(RS.IN CRORES)
YEARS NET PROFIT NET WORTH RATIOS (%)
2011 2081.95 12764.52 16.31
2010 2074.92 10423.78 19.90
2009 1726.55 8740.36 19.75
2008 1387.03 7347.71 18.87
2007 845.39 5189.87 16.28
ANALYSIS:
The table above shows that in the year 2011 Return On Net Worth was 16.31%
while in 2010 it was 19.90% whereas in 2009 it was 19.75% while for the year
2008 it was 18.87% whereas in 2007 Return On Net Worth was 16.28%.
GRAPH 4.9: RETURN ON NET WORTH
INFERENCE:
From the above graph it can be seen that in the year 2007 Return on Net Worth
was the lowest with16.28% whereas in 2008 it increased to 18.87% while in 2009
it further increased to 19.75% whereas in 2010 it increased to 19.90 % which was
the highest while in 2011 it again decreased to 16.31%.
.
E. INVESTMENT VALUATION RATIOS
1. Dividend Per Share: The amount of dividend that a stockholder will receive for
each share of stock held. It can be calculated by taking the total amount of
dividends paid and dividing it by the total shares outstanding.
Dividend Per Share = Equity Dividend
No. of Share
TABLE 4.10: DIVIDEND PER SHARE
(RS.IN CRORES)
ANALYSIS:
The table above shows that in the year 2011 Dividend per Share was 80.00 while
in 2010 and 2009 it was 50.00 whereas in 2008 was 40.00 while for the year 2007
Dividend per share was 30.00.
GRAPH 4.10: DIVIDEND PER SHARE
YEARS EQUITY
DIVIDEND
NO. OF
SHARES
RATIOS
2011 419.47 524699068 80.00
2010 277.81 505294547 50.00
2009 252.56 505324751 50.00
2008 202.05 5052284049 40.00
2007 176.79 505340501 30.00
INFERENCE:
From the above graph it can be seen that in the year 2007 Dividend per Share was
the lowest i.e. 30.00. It has increased gradually and reached the highest in the year
2011 with 80.00 per share.
2. Net Operating Profit Per Share: A measure of a company's earning power
from ongoing operations, equal to earnings before deduction of interest payments
and income taxes. Also called EBIT or operating income.
Net Operating Profit per Share = Net Operating Profit
No of Shares
TABLE 4.11: NET OPERATING PROFIT PER SHARE
(RS.IN CRORES)
YEARS NET
OPERARING
PROFIT
NO. OF SHARES RATIOS
2011 13353.71 524699068 254.50
2010 12070.66 505294547 238.88
2009 10611.34 505324751 209.99
2008 8501.77 505228404 168.27
2007 7138.06 505340501 141.25
ANALYSIS:
The table above shows that in the year 2011 Net operating Profit per Share was
254.50 while in 2010 it was 238.88 whereas in 2009 it was 209.99 while for the
year 2008 it was 168.27 whereas in 2007 Net operating Profit per share was
141.25.
GRAPH 4.11: NET OPERATING PROFIT
INFERENCE
The above graph shows that the Net operating profit per share in 2007 is 141.25%
which is the lowest while in 2008 it has increased to 168.27%, whereas in 2009 it
has again increased to 209.99%, while in 2010 it has slightly increased to 238.88%
whereas in 2011 it is the highest with 254.50%.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
TABLE 4.12: COMPARITIVE BALANCE SHEET AS ON 31ST MARCH, 2007
(RS.IN CRORES)
PARTICULARS AS ON
Mar 2008
AS ON Mar
2007
INC OR
DEC
% INC OR
DEC
SHAREHOLDER’S FUND
Capital 505.12 505.12 0 0
Reserves and Surplus 6842.59 4684.75 2157.84 46.06
TOTAL 7347.71 5189.87 2157.84 41.57
FIXED ASSETS
Gross Block 2937.45 1487.21 1450.24 6.55
Less: Depreciation 741.62 664.49 77.13 11.60
Net Block 2195.83 822.72 1373.11 166.89
Cap. Work–in-progress 4.57 2.28 2.29 100.43
Other Assets 3604.10 3058.24 545.86 17.85
9483.57 6034.94 3448.63 57.14
INVESTMENTS 33822.63 27981.77 5840.86 20.87
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash & Balances with
RBI
9454.74 5917.57 3537.17 59.77
Balance with Banks,
Money at Call
643.10 2508.87 (1865.77) 74.36
Advances 74348.29 62386.43 11961.86 19.17
84446.13 70812.87 13633.26 19.25
Less:
CURRENTLIABILITIES
Deposits 103858.65 85180.22 18678.43 21.93
Borrowings 4760.49 4215.53 544.96 12.93
Other Liabilities & 8106.43 8092.26 14.17 .2
INFERENCE
The Comparative balance sheet shows that during the year 2008 the Net worth has
increased by Rs.2157.84 Cr. i.e. 41.57% as there has been an increase in Reserve
and Surplus. Fixed Assets have grown by Rs.3448.63 Cr. i.e. 57.14%. Investment
has increased by 20.87%. Net Current Assets have decreased by Rs.5604.3 Cr. i.e.
21.00% resulting into a weak liquidity position of the company
TABLE 4.13: COMPARITIVE BALANCE SHEET AS ON 31ST MARCH, 2008
(RS.IN CRORES)
PARTICULARS AS ON
Mar 2009
AS ON Mar
2008
INC OR
DEC
% INC OR
DEC
SHAREHOLDER’S FUND
Capital 505.12 505.12 0 0
Reserves and Surplus 8235.24 6842.59 1392.65 20.35
TOTAL 8704.36 7347.71 1356.65 18.46
FIXED ASSETS
Gross Block 3220.65 2937.45 283.2 9.64
Less: Depreciation 893.35 741.62 151.73 20.45
Net Block 2327.30 2195.83 131.47 5.98
Cap.Work–in-progress 7.86 4.57 3.29 71.99
Other Assets 3124.23 3604.10 (479.87) 13.31
9573.39 9483.57 89.82 0.9
INVESTMENTS 42996.96 33822.63 9174.33 27.12
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash & Balances with
RBI
8992.05 9454.74 (462.69) 4.89
Balance with Banks,
Money at Call
6992.88 643.10 6349.78 987.3
Advances 96534.23 74348.29 22185.94 29.84
112519.6 84446.13 28073.03 33.24
Less:
CURRENTLIABILITIES
INFERENCE
The Comparative balance sheet shows that during the year 2008 the Net worth has
increased by Rs.1356.65 Cr. i.e. 18.46% and Reserve and Surplus, 20.35%. Fixed
Assets have grown by Rs.89.82 Cr. i.e. 0.9%Investment has increased by 27.12%.
Current Assets have increased by 33.24% and there have been an increase in
Current Liabilities by 30.42%. As a result Net Current Assets has decreased by
Rs.13040.42 i.e. 48.88% which shows a weak liquidity position of the company.
TABLE 4.14: COMPARITIVE BALANCE SHEET AS ON 31ST MARCH, 2009
(RS.IN CRORES)
PARTICULARS
AS ON Mar
2010
AS ON Mar
2009
INC OR
DEC
% INC OR
DEC
SHAREHOLDER’S
FUND
Capital 505.12 505.12 0 0
Reserves and Surplus 9918.66 8235.24 1683.42 20.44
TOTAL 10423.78 8704.36 1719.42 19.75
FIXED ASSETS
Gross Block 3396.98 3220.65 176.33 5.47
Less: Depreciation 1101.5 893.35 208.15 23.29
Net Block 2295.48 2327.3 -31.82 -1.36
Cap.Work–in-progress 9.96 7.86 2.1 26.71
Other Assets 3360.89 3124.23 236.66 7.57
10164.81 9573.39 591.42 6.17
INVESTMENTS 54403.53 42996.96 11406.57 26.52
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash & Balances with RBI 12468.24 8992.05 3476.19 38.65
Balance with Banks,
Money at Call
3308.45 6992.88 -3684.43 -52.68
Advances 119315.3 96534.23 22781.07 23.59
135091.99 112519.6 22572.39 20.06
Less:
CURRENTLIABILITIES
Deposits 170039.74 138702.83 31336.91 22.59
INFERENCE
The Comparative balance sheet shows that during the year 2010 the Net worth has
increased by Rs.1719.42 i.e.19.75% and Reserve and Surplus, 20.44%. Fixed
Assets have decreased by Rs.591.42Cr. i.e. 6.17%. Investment has increased by
26.52%.Current Assets have increased by 20.06% and there have been an increase
in Current Liabilities by 21.35%. As a result Net Current Assets has decreased by
Rs.9930.51Cr. i.e. 25.00% which shows a weak liquidity position of the company.
TABLE 4.15: COMPARITIVE BALANCE SHEET AS ON 31STMARCH, 2010
(RS.IN CRORES)
PARTICULARS
AS ON Mar
2011
AS ON Mar
2010
INC OR
DEC
% INC OR
DEC
SHAREHOLDER’S
FUND
Capital 635.33 505.12 130.21 25.77
Reserves and Surplus 12129.19 9918.66 2210.53 22.28
TOTAL 12764.52 10423.78 2340.74 22.45
FIXED ASSETS 0
Gross Block 3598.41 3396.98 201.43 5.92
Less: Depreciation 1319.21 1101.5 217.71 19.76
Net Block 2279.2 2295.48 -16.28 -0.70
Cap.Work–in-progress 13.58 9.96 3.62 36.34
Other Assets 4208 3360.89 847.11 25.20
11418.4 10164.81 1253.59 12.33
INVESTMENTS 58339.14 54403.53 3935.61 7.23
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash & Balances with RBI 17610.45 12468.24 5142.21 41.24
Balance with Banks,
Money at Call
2487.99 3308.45 -820.46 -24.79
Advances 150986.08 119315.3 31670.78 26.54
171084.52 135091.99 35992.53 26.64
Less:
CURRENTLIABILITIES
Deposits 202461.29 170039.74 32421.55 19.06
Borrowings 13315.97 9215.31 4100.66 44.49
Other Liabilities &
Provisions
7442.67 5483.01 1959.66 35.74
223219.93 184738.06 38481.87 20.83
Net Current Assets -52135.41 -49646.07 -2489.34 5.01
TOTAL 12764.52 10423.78 2340.74 22.45
INFERENCE
The Comparative balance sheet shows that during the year 2011 the Net worth has
increased by Rs.2340.74 Cr. i.e. 24.55% as there has been an increase in Reserve
and Surplus, 22.28%. Fixed Assets have increased by Rs.1253.59Cr. i.e. 12.33%.
Investment has increased by 7.23 %.
Current Assets have increased by 26.64% and there have been an increase in
Current Liabilities by 20.83%. As a result Net Current Assets has increased by
Rs.2489.34 Cr. i.e. 5.01% resulting into an weak liquidity position of the company.
TABLE 4.16: COMPARITIVE INCOME STATEMENT AS ON MARCH, 2007
(RS.IN CRORES)
PARTICULARS AS ON Mar
2008
AS ON Mar
2007
INC OR
DEC
% INC OR
DEC
INCOME
Interest Earned 9447.3 7382.18 2065.12 27.97
Other Income 1232.67 841.8 390.87 46.43
TOTAL 10679.97 8223.96 2456.01 29.86
EXPENDITURE
Interest Expanded 6360.95 4591.96 1768.99 38.52
Employee Cost 845.68 873.8 -28.12 -3.21
Selling &
Administrative
Expenses
946.34 620.16 326.18 52.59
Miscellaneous
Expenses
1038.15 1206.3 -168.15 -13.93
Operating
Expenses
2178.2 1805.92 372.28 20.61
Provisions &
Contingencies
753.79 980.71 -226.92 -23.13
TOTAL 33483.05 26526.79 6956.26 26.22
PROFIT
BEFORE
DEPRECIATION
1488.85 931.76 557.09 59.78
Depreciation 101.82 86.37 15.45 17.88
NET PROFIT
FOR THE YEAR
1387.03 845.39 541.64 64.06
INFERENCE
The Comparative Income Statement shows that during the year 2008 the Total
Income has increased by Rs.2456.01 Cr. i.e. 29.86% as there has been an increase
in Interest Earned, 27.97% and Other Income, 46.43%. Total Expenditure has
increased by Rs.6956.26 i.e. 26.22% .Depreciation has increased by 15.45 %.
Net Profit has increased by Rs.541.64 Cr. i.e. 64.06%.
TABLE 4.17: COMPARITIVE INCOME STATEMENT AS ON MARCH, 2008
(RS.IN CRORES)
PARTICULARS
AS ON
Mar 2009
AS ON
Mar 2008
INC OR
DEC
% INC OR
DEC
INCOME
Interest Earned 11889.38 9447.3 2442.08 25.84
Other Income 1482.55 1232.67 249.88 20.27
TOTAL 13371.93 10679.97 2691.96 25.20
EXPENDITURE
Interest Expanded 8075.81 6360.95 1714.86 26.95
Employee Cost 1152.36 845.68 306.68 36.26
Selling &
Administrative
Expenses
1082.54 946.34 136.2 14.39
Miscellaneous
Expenses
1198.08 1038.15 159.93 15.40
Operating
Expenses
2760.59 2178.2 582.39 26.73
Provisions &
Contingencies
808.97 753.79 55.18 7.32
TOTAL 41822.21 33483.05 8339.16 24.90
PROFIT
BEFORE
DEPRECIATION
1863.13 1488.85 374.28 25.13
Depreciation 136.58 101.82 34.76 34.13
NET PROFIT
FOR THE YEAR
1726.55 1387.03 339.52 24.47
INFERENCE
The Comparative Income Statement shows that during the year 2009 the Total
Income has increased by Rs.2691.96 Cr. i.e. 25.20% as there has been an increase
in Interest Earned, 25.84% and Other Income, 20.27%. Total Expenditure has
increased by Rs.8339.16 i.e. 24.90% Depreciation has increased by 34.13%.
Net Profit has increased by Rs.339.52 Cr. i.e. 24.47
TABLE 4.18: COMPARITIVE INCOME STATEMENT AS ON MARCH, 2009
(RS.IN CRORES)
PARTICULARS
AS ON
Mar 2010
AS ON
Mar 2009
INC OR
DEC
% INC OR
DEC
INCOME
Interest Earned 13302.68 11889.38 1413.3 11.88
Other Income 1974.74 1482.55 492.19 33.19
TOTAL 15277.42 13371.93 1905.49 14.24
EXPENDITURE
Interest Expanded 9110.27 8075.81 1034.46 12.80
Employee Cost 1354.99 1152.36 202.63 17.58
Selling &
Administrative
Expenses
1225.57 1082.54 143.03 13.21
Miscellaneous
Expenses
1351.53 1198.08 153.45 12.80
Operating
Expenses
3206.76 2760.59 446.17 16.16
Provisions &
Contingencies
885.47 808.97 76.5 9.45
TOTAL 47689.43 41822.21 5867.22 14.02
PROFIT
BEFORE
DEPRECIATION
2235.06 1863.13 371.93 19.96
Depreciation 160.14 136.58 23.56 17.24
NET PROFIT
FOR THE YEAR
2074.92 1726.55 348.37 20.17723205
INFERENCE
The Comparative Income Statement shows that during the year 2010 the Total
Income has increased by Rs. 1905.49 Cr. i.e. 14.24% as there has been an increase
in Interest Earned, 11.88% and Other Income, 33.19%. Total Expenditure has
increased by 14.02% .Depreciation has increased by 17.24%. Net Profit has
increased by Rs. 348.37 Cr. i.e. 20.17%.
TABLE 4.19: COMPARITIVE INCOME STATEMENT AS ON MARCH, 2010
(RS.IN CRORES)
PARTICULARS
AS ON
Mar 2011
AS ON
Mar 2010
INC OR
DEC
% INC OR
DEC
INCOME
Interest Earned 16452.62 13302.68 3149.94 23.67
Other Income 2038.78 1974.74 64.04 3.24
TOTAL 18491.4 15277.42 3213.98 21.03
EXPENDITURE
Interest Expanded 10236.42 9110.27 1126.15 12.36
Employee Cost 2600.25 1354.99 1245.26 91.90
Selling &
Administrative
Expenses
1814.19 1225.57 588.62 48.02
Miscellaneous
Expenses
1602.94 1351.53 251.41 18.60
Operating
Expenses
5137.69 3206.76 1930.93 60.21
Provisions &
Contingencies
1035.35 885.47 149.88 16.92
TOTAL 59409.64 47689.43 11720.21 24.57
PROFIT
BEFORE
DEPRECIATION
2237.61 2235.06 2.55 0.11
Depreciation 155.66 160.14 -4.48 -2.79
NET PROFIT
FOR THE YEAR
2081.95 2074.92 7.03 0.33
INFERENCE
The Comparative Income Statement shows that during the year 2010 the Total
Income has increased by Rs. 3213.98 Cr. i.e. 21.03% as there has been an increase
in Interest Earned, 23.67% and Other Income, 21.03%. Total Expenditure has
increased by Rs.11720.21 i.e. 24.57% .Depreciation has decreased by 2.79%.
Net Profit has increased by Rs. 7.03 Cr. i.e. 0.33%.
TABLE 4.20: TREND ANALYSIS (BALANCE SHEET)
(RS.IN CRORES)
PARTICULARS 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
SHAREHOLDER’S
FUND
Capital 100 100 119.99 120.63 120.63
Reserves and Surplus 100 113.48 178.49 211.35 240.85
TOTAL 100 113.22 177.37 209.62 238.57
FIXED ASSETS
Gross Block 100 108.58 121.06 140.11 159.35
Less: Depreciation 100 113.01 123.09 143.71 162.36
Net Block 100 100.14 117.44 133.72 154.04
Cap.Work–in-
progress
100 117.85 293.49 330.04 369.81
Other Assets 100 113.01 198.46 168.60 156.89
100 111.85 190.11 165.40 157.26
INVESTMENTS 100 91.76 116.59 169.78 175.83
CURRENT
ASSETS
Cash & Balances
with RBI
100 134.29 238.01 256.33 283.06
Balance with Banks,
Money at Call
100 99.93 69.55 213.88 152.32
Advances 100 128.93 159.29 207.20 241.52
100 127.14 158.14 211.27 237.78
Less:
CURRENTLIABILITIES
Deposits 100 114.60 141.40 195.26 211.58
Borrowings 100 129.57 168.82 175.30 336.19
INFERENCE OF TREND ANALYSIS
The trend analysis is calculated by taking 2007 as base year in which increase and
decrease of unit‘s assets and liabilities are reflected. The Shareholders Funds have
continuously increased in all the years up to 2011. The percentage in 2011 is
238.57 as compared to 100 0n 2007.
The Fixed Assets have grown upwards to 190.11% in the year 2009. Then, have
decreased to 157.26% in 2011.
Investments have decreased to 91.76% in 2008 and increased to 175.83% in 2011.
The Current Assets have continuously increased in all the years up to 2011. The
percentage in 2011 is 237.78 as compared to 100 0n 2007.
The Current Liabilities also have continuously increased in all the years up to
2011. The percentage in 2011 is 211.80 as compared to 100 0n 2007.
The Net Current Assets have increased to 109.63% in 2008 and decreased to
61.69% in 2011.
TABLE 4.21: TREND ANALYSIS (INCOME STATEMENT)
(RS.IN CRORES)
INFERENCE OF TREND ANALYSIS
PARTICULARS 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
INCOME
Interest Earned 100 110.33 136.75 178.21 198.34
Other Income 100 100.79 127.20 171.77 202.58
TOTAL 100 108.69 135.12 177.10 199.06
EXPENDITURE
Interest Expanded 100 116.23 158.38 212.80 234.74
Employee Cost 100 97.65 95.64 119.99 157.02
Selling &
Administrative
Expenses
100 175.42 224.78 276.37 426.16
Miscellaneous
Expenses
100 90.66 89.21 111.35 99.69
Operating Expenses 100 111.61 123.05 125.65 210.06
Provisions &
Contingencies
100 84.63 75.33 93.70 67.20
TOTAL 100 109.84 133.88 175.03 199.39
PROFIT BEFORE
DEPRECIATION
100 100.15 144.26 192.46 196.63
Depreciation 100 82.63 93.26 104.66 127.91
NET PROFIT FOR
THE YEAR
100 103.05 152.70 206.99 208.00
The trend analysis is calculated by taking 2007 as base year in which increase and
decrease of unit‘s income and expenses are reflected.
The total income has continuously increased in all the years up to 2011. The
percentage in 2011 is 199.06 as compared to 100 0n 2007.
The total expenditure also has continuously increased in all the years up to 2011.
The percentage in 2011 is 199.39 as compared to 100 0n 2007.
The operating expenses have continuously increased in all the years up to 2011.
The percentage in 2011 is 210.06 as compared to 100 0n 2007. The comparative
increase in 2011 is much higher as it has increased to 210.06% from 125.65% in
2010.
The net profit has continuously increased in all the years up to 2011. The
percentage in 2011 is 208.00 as compared to 100 in 2007. The growth of the firm
is good and it has doubled its profits in just five years’ time.
CHAPTER 5
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
AND
CONCLUSIONS
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS & CONCLUSION
THE SUMMARY OF FINDINGS OF THE STUDY IS INDICATED BELOW
1. The company has been maintaining a constant Current Ratio. It has
remained same at 0.08 in 2007, 2008, 2011 but it has slightly increased in
2009 and 2011.
2. The Earning per Share trend is increasing in nature as it has increased to
39.67 in 2011 from 16.72 in 2007.
3. The Interest Income to Total Funds Ratio is fluctuating and has decreased
from 7.18 percent in 2007 to 6.82 percent in 2011 and then slightly
increased in 2011.
4. The Operating Expense to Total Income is varying and has increased from
2007 in 21.95 percent to 27.78 percent in 2011. Net Profit Margin is
fluctuating. In 2007 it was 10.27 percent and has increased to 11.25 percent
in 2011
5. The Net Profit to Total Funds ratio is varying in nature and has increased
from 0.82 percent in 2007 to 0.88 percent in 2011.
6. The Interest Expanded to Interest Earned can be said increasing in nature as
it has increased from 62.20 percent in 2007 to 68.48 percent in 2011 but has
decreased to 62.21 percent in 2011.
7. The operating expenses have continuously increased in all the years up to
2011. The percentage in 2011 is 210.06 as compared to 100 0n 2007.
8. The net profit has continuously increased in all the years up to 2011. The
percentage in 2011 is 208.00 as compared to 100 in 2007. The growth of the
firm is good and it has doubled its profits in just five years’ time.
9. The Return on Net Worth is varying in nature and it has increased from
16.28 percent in 2007 to 16.31 percent in 2011.
10. The trend of Dividend per Share is increasing in nature. Dividend per Share
has increased from 30 in 2007 to 80 in 2011.
11.The Shareholder‘s Funds have increasing trend as it has increased by 238.57
percent i.e. the company has doubled its shareholder‘s funds in a period of
five years.
12. The Fixed Assets have fluctuating trend .It has increased by 157.26 percent.
13. The Investments have increased by 175.83 percent.
14. The Net Current Assets can be said decreasing in nature. It has decreased to
61.69 percent as compared to 100 in 2007.
15.The Total Income of the Company has been increasing and has reached to
199.06 percent in 2011.
CONCLUSION
The important of the financial statement analysis lies in the fact that it presents
facts on a comparative basis and enables the drawing of inferences regarding the
performance of the firms.
The comparative statement analysis is relevant in assessing the performance of a
business concern as it adds meaning to the financial data and it is also used to
effectively measure the conduct of the business activities.
And trend analysis also has its own importance as a trend analysis indicates in
which direction a business is moving i.e. upward or downwards and it gives a
better picture of the overall performance of the business and its also helps in
analyzing the financial performance over a period of time.
On other hand, with the help of ratio analysis conclusion can be drawn regarding
the liquidity position of the company. The liquidity ratios are useful in credit
analysis by banks and other suppliers of short term loans. Ratios analysis is equally
useful for assessing the long term financial viability of a firm. The long term
solvency is measured by the leverage and profitability ratios which focus on
earning power and operating efficiency.
Ratio analysis reveals the strength and weaknesses of a company in this respect.
The leverage ratios will indicate whether a firm has a reasonable proposition of
various sources of finance or whether heavily loaded with debt in which case its
solvency is exposed to serious strain. The various profitability ratios would reveals
whether or not the firm is able to offer adequate return to its owner consistent with
the risk involved.
Thus, Financial Statement Analysis has application and is of immense use today.
Financial Statement Analysis is extremely helpful in providing valuable insight
into a company‘s financial picture. It can point out whether the financial conditions
are strong, good, questionable or poor. Financial Statement Analysis provides an
easy way to compare present performance with the past.
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5
Chapter 4,5

More Related Content

Similar to Chapter 4,5

1CHAPTER 3Analysis of Financial Statements.docx
1CHAPTER 3Analysis of Financial Statements.docx1CHAPTER 3Analysis of Financial Statements.docx
1CHAPTER 3Analysis of Financial Statements.docxhyacinthshackley2629
 
Corporate Financial Management Assignment - Ratio Analysis of Hays plc
Corporate Financial Management Assignment - Ratio Analysis of Hays plcCorporate Financial Management Assignment - Ratio Analysis of Hays plc
Corporate Financial Management Assignment - Ratio Analysis of Hays plcAmany Hamza
 
Corporation bank ru2 qfy2011-221010
Corporation bank ru2 qfy2011-221010Corporation bank ru2 qfy2011-221010
Corporation bank ru2 qfy2011-221010Angel Broking
 
Capital budgeting examples
Capital budgeting examplesCapital budgeting examples
Capital budgeting examplesks Chan
 
Arvind Mills
Arvind MillsArvind Mills
Arvind Millsanshulabu
 
Financial statement analysis_ece_industries
Financial statement analysis_ece_industriesFinancial statement analysis_ece_industries
Financial statement analysis_ece_industriesUtkarsh Jain
 
15-Analysis of Financial Statement
15-Analysis of Financial Statement15-Analysis of Financial Statement
15-Analysis of Financial StatementWahyu Wijanarko
 
Italy 2017 OECD Economic Survey Reforms are paying off, but challenges remain
Italy 2017 OECD Economic Survey Reforms are paying off, but challenges remainItaly 2017 OECD Economic Survey Reforms are paying off, but challenges remain
Italy 2017 OECD Economic Survey Reforms are paying off, but challenges remainOECD, Economics Department
 
1,2 & 3,4 ratio analysis updated
1,2 & 3,4 ratio analysis updated1,2 & 3,4 ratio analysis updated
1,2 & 3,4 ratio analysis updatedSyafiq Zariful
 
Assignment on financial ratio by Md. Parvez Alam.
Assignment on financial ratio by Md. Parvez Alam.Assignment on financial ratio by Md. Parvez Alam.
Assignment on financial ratio by Md. Parvez Alam.MD. Parvez Alam
 
Financial statemet anlysis of co operative bank
Financial statemet anlysis of co operative bankFinancial statemet anlysis of co operative bank
Financial statemet anlysis of co operative bankNeeraj Singh
 
Data analysis
Data analysisData analysis
Data analysisAJAL A J
 
Stock Analysis of HDFC Bank.pptx
Stock Analysis of HDFC Bank.pptxStock Analysis of HDFC Bank.pptx
Stock Analysis of HDFC Bank.pptxAdarshSingh749984
 
Comparison of Ratio analysis of banks of NEPAL....
Comparison of Ratio analysis of banks of NEPAL....Comparison of Ratio analysis of banks of NEPAL....
Comparison of Ratio analysis of banks of NEPAL....R K Tiwari Sagar
 
Income StatementBalance SheetCash Flow Statement
Income StatementBalance SheetCash Flow StatementIncome StatementBalance SheetCash Flow Statement
Income StatementBalance SheetCash Flow Statementmanijutt
 
Evaluation of Financial Performance of SIBL
Evaluation of Financial Performance of SIBLEvaluation of Financial Performance of SIBL
Evaluation of Financial Performance of SIBLRakib Hossain
 

Similar to Chapter 4,5 (20)

1CHAPTER 3Analysis of Financial Statements.docx
1CHAPTER 3Analysis of Financial Statements.docx1CHAPTER 3Analysis of Financial Statements.docx
1CHAPTER 3Analysis of Financial Statements.docx
 
Corporate Financial Management Assignment - Ratio Analysis of Hays plc
Corporate Financial Management Assignment - Ratio Analysis of Hays plcCorporate Financial Management Assignment - Ratio Analysis of Hays plc
Corporate Financial Management Assignment - Ratio Analysis of Hays plc
 
Corporation bank ru2 qfy2011-221010
Corporation bank ru2 qfy2011-221010Corporation bank ru2 qfy2011-221010
Corporation bank ru2 qfy2011-221010
 
SOP Assignment 2
SOP Assignment 2SOP Assignment 2
SOP Assignment 2
 
Capital budgeting examples
Capital budgeting examplesCapital budgeting examples
Capital budgeting examples
 
Arvind Mills
Arvind MillsArvind Mills
Arvind Mills
 
Financial statement analysis_ece_industries
Financial statement analysis_ece_industriesFinancial statement analysis_ece_industries
Financial statement analysis_ece_industries
 
15-Analysis of Financial Statement
15-Analysis of Financial Statement15-Analysis of Financial Statement
15-Analysis of Financial Statement
 
Italy 2017 OECD Economic Survey Reforms are paying off, but challenges remain
Italy 2017 OECD Economic Survey Reforms are paying off, but challenges remainItaly 2017 OECD Economic Survey Reforms are paying off, but challenges remain
Italy 2017 OECD Economic Survey Reforms are paying off, but challenges remain
 
1,2 & 3,4 ratio analysis updated
1,2 & 3,4 ratio analysis updated1,2 & 3,4 ratio analysis updated
1,2 & 3,4 ratio analysis updated
 
Assignment on financial ratio by Md. Parvez Alam.
Assignment on financial ratio by Md. Parvez Alam.Assignment on financial ratio by Md. Parvez Alam.
Assignment on financial ratio by Md. Parvez Alam.
 
Chapter 4
Chapter 4Chapter 4
Chapter 4
 
Financial statemet anlysis of co operative bank
Financial statemet anlysis of co operative bankFinancial statemet anlysis of co operative bank
Financial statemet anlysis of co operative bank
 
Liquidity ratio
Liquidity ratioLiquidity ratio
Liquidity ratio
 
Data analysis
Data analysisData analysis
Data analysis
 
Stock Analysis of HDFC Bank.pptx
Stock Analysis of HDFC Bank.pptxStock Analysis of HDFC Bank.pptx
Stock Analysis of HDFC Bank.pptx
 
Comparison of Ratio analysis of banks of NEPAL....
Comparison of Ratio analysis of banks of NEPAL....Comparison of Ratio analysis of banks of NEPAL....
Comparison of Ratio analysis of banks of NEPAL....
 
Financial analysis of national grid plc
Financial analysis of national grid plcFinancial analysis of national grid plc
Financial analysis of national grid plc
 
Income StatementBalance SheetCash Flow Statement
Income StatementBalance SheetCash Flow StatementIncome StatementBalance SheetCash Flow Statement
Income StatementBalance SheetCash Flow Statement
 
Evaluation of Financial Performance of SIBL
Evaluation of Financial Performance of SIBLEvaluation of Financial Performance of SIBL
Evaluation of Financial Performance of SIBL
 

Recently uploaded

Building on a FAIRly Strong Foundation to Connect Academic Research to Transl...
Building on a FAIRly Strong Foundation to Connect Academic Research to Transl...Building on a FAIRly Strong Foundation to Connect Academic Research to Transl...
Building on a FAIRly Strong Foundation to Connect Academic Research to Transl...Jack DiGiovanna
 
Beautiful Sapna Vip Call Girls Hauz Khas 9711199012 Call /Whatsapps
Beautiful Sapna Vip  Call Girls Hauz Khas 9711199012 Call /WhatsappsBeautiful Sapna Vip  Call Girls Hauz Khas 9711199012 Call /Whatsapps
Beautiful Sapna Vip Call Girls Hauz Khas 9711199012 Call /Whatsappssapnasaifi408
 
Call Us ➥97111√47426🤳Call Girls in Aerocity (Delhi NCR)
Call Us ➥97111√47426🤳Call Girls in Aerocity (Delhi NCR)Call Us ➥97111√47426🤳Call Girls in Aerocity (Delhi NCR)
Call Us ➥97111√47426🤳Call Girls in Aerocity (Delhi NCR)jennyeacort
 
Defining Constituents, Data Vizzes and Telling a Data Story
Defining Constituents, Data Vizzes and Telling a Data StoryDefining Constituents, Data Vizzes and Telling a Data Story
Defining Constituents, Data Vizzes and Telling a Data StoryJeremy Anderson
 
RABBIT: A CLI tool for identifying bots based on their GitHub events.
RABBIT: A CLI tool for identifying bots based on their GitHub events.RABBIT: A CLI tool for identifying bots based on their GitHub events.
RABBIT: A CLI tool for identifying bots based on their GitHub events.natarajan8993
 
DBA Basics: Getting Started with Performance Tuning.pdf
DBA Basics: Getting Started with Performance Tuning.pdfDBA Basics: Getting Started with Performance Tuning.pdf
DBA Basics: Getting Started with Performance Tuning.pdfJohn Sterrett
 
2006_GasProcessing_HB (1).pdf HYDROCARBON PROCESSING
2006_GasProcessing_HB (1).pdf HYDROCARBON PROCESSING2006_GasProcessing_HB (1).pdf HYDROCARBON PROCESSING
2006_GasProcessing_HB (1).pdf HYDROCARBON PROCESSINGmarianagonzalez07
 
IMA MSN - Medical Students Network (2).pptx
IMA MSN - Medical Students Network (2).pptxIMA MSN - Medical Students Network (2).pptx
IMA MSN - Medical Students Network (2).pptxdolaknnilon
 
MK KOMUNIKASI DATA (TI)komdat komdat.docx
MK KOMUNIKASI DATA (TI)komdat komdat.docxMK KOMUNIKASI DATA (TI)komdat komdat.docx
MK KOMUNIKASI DATA (TI)komdat komdat.docxUnduhUnggah1
 
How we prevented account sharing with MFA
How we prevented account sharing with MFAHow we prevented account sharing with MFA
How we prevented account sharing with MFAAndrei Kaleshka
 
Heart Disease Classification Report: A Data Analysis Project
Heart Disease Classification Report: A Data Analysis ProjectHeart Disease Classification Report: A Data Analysis Project
Heart Disease Classification Report: A Data Analysis ProjectBoston Institute of Analytics
 
GA4 Without Cookies [Measure Camp AMS]
GA4 Without Cookies [Measure Camp AMS]GA4 Without Cookies [Measure Camp AMS]
GA4 Without Cookies [Measure Camp AMS]📊 Markus Baersch
 
Predicting Salary Using Data Science: A Comprehensive Analysis.pdf
Predicting Salary Using Data Science: A Comprehensive Analysis.pdfPredicting Salary Using Data Science: A Comprehensive Analysis.pdf
Predicting Salary Using Data Science: A Comprehensive Analysis.pdfBoston Institute of Analytics
 
NLP Data Science Project Presentation:Predicting Heart Disease with NLP Data ...
NLP Data Science Project Presentation:Predicting Heart Disease with NLP Data ...NLP Data Science Project Presentation:Predicting Heart Disease with NLP Data ...
NLP Data Science Project Presentation:Predicting Heart Disease with NLP Data ...Boston Institute of Analytics
 
dokumen.tips_chapter-4-transient-heat-conduction-mehmet-kanoglu.ppt
dokumen.tips_chapter-4-transient-heat-conduction-mehmet-kanoglu.pptdokumen.tips_chapter-4-transient-heat-conduction-mehmet-kanoglu.ppt
dokumen.tips_chapter-4-transient-heat-conduction-mehmet-kanoglu.pptSonatrach
 
RadioAdProWritingCinderellabyButleri.pdf
RadioAdProWritingCinderellabyButleri.pdfRadioAdProWritingCinderellabyButleri.pdf
RadioAdProWritingCinderellabyButleri.pdfgstagge
 
Effects of Smartphone Addiction on the Academic Performances of Grades 9 to 1...
Effects of Smartphone Addiction on the Academic Performances of Grades 9 to 1...Effects of Smartphone Addiction on the Academic Performances of Grades 9 to 1...
Effects of Smartphone Addiction on the Academic Performances of Grades 9 to 1...limedy534
 
Identifying Appropriate Test Statistics Involving Population Mean
Identifying Appropriate Test Statistics Involving Population MeanIdentifying Appropriate Test Statistics Involving Population Mean
Identifying Appropriate Test Statistics Involving Population MeanMYRABACSAFRA2
 
ASML's Taxonomy Adventure by Daniel Canter
ASML's Taxonomy Adventure by Daniel CanterASML's Taxonomy Adventure by Daniel Canter
ASML's Taxonomy Adventure by Daniel Cantervoginip
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Building on a FAIRly Strong Foundation to Connect Academic Research to Transl...
Building on a FAIRly Strong Foundation to Connect Academic Research to Transl...Building on a FAIRly Strong Foundation to Connect Academic Research to Transl...
Building on a FAIRly Strong Foundation to Connect Academic Research to Transl...
 
Beautiful Sapna Vip Call Girls Hauz Khas 9711199012 Call /Whatsapps
Beautiful Sapna Vip  Call Girls Hauz Khas 9711199012 Call /WhatsappsBeautiful Sapna Vip  Call Girls Hauz Khas 9711199012 Call /Whatsapps
Beautiful Sapna Vip Call Girls Hauz Khas 9711199012 Call /Whatsapps
 
Call Us ➥97111√47426🤳Call Girls in Aerocity (Delhi NCR)
Call Us ➥97111√47426🤳Call Girls in Aerocity (Delhi NCR)Call Us ➥97111√47426🤳Call Girls in Aerocity (Delhi NCR)
Call Us ➥97111√47426🤳Call Girls in Aerocity (Delhi NCR)
 
Defining Constituents, Data Vizzes and Telling a Data Story
Defining Constituents, Data Vizzes and Telling a Data StoryDefining Constituents, Data Vizzes and Telling a Data Story
Defining Constituents, Data Vizzes and Telling a Data Story
 
RABBIT: A CLI tool for identifying bots based on their GitHub events.
RABBIT: A CLI tool for identifying bots based on their GitHub events.RABBIT: A CLI tool for identifying bots based on their GitHub events.
RABBIT: A CLI tool for identifying bots based on their GitHub events.
 
DBA Basics: Getting Started with Performance Tuning.pdf
DBA Basics: Getting Started with Performance Tuning.pdfDBA Basics: Getting Started with Performance Tuning.pdf
DBA Basics: Getting Started with Performance Tuning.pdf
 
2006_GasProcessing_HB (1).pdf HYDROCARBON PROCESSING
2006_GasProcessing_HB (1).pdf HYDROCARBON PROCESSING2006_GasProcessing_HB (1).pdf HYDROCARBON PROCESSING
2006_GasProcessing_HB (1).pdf HYDROCARBON PROCESSING
 
IMA MSN - Medical Students Network (2).pptx
IMA MSN - Medical Students Network (2).pptxIMA MSN - Medical Students Network (2).pptx
IMA MSN - Medical Students Network (2).pptx
 
MK KOMUNIKASI DATA (TI)komdat komdat.docx
MK KOMUNIKASI DATA (TI)komdat komdat.docxMK KOMUNIKASI DATA (TI)komdat komdat.docx
MK KOMUNIKASI DATA (TI)komdat komdat.docx
 
How we prevented account sharing with MFA
How we prevented account sharing with MFAHow we prevented account sharing with MFA
How we prevented account sharing with MFA
 
Heart Disease Classification Report: A Data Analysis Project
Heart Disease Classification Report: A Data Analysis ProjectHeart Disease Classification Report: A Data Analysis Project
Heart Disease Classification Report: A Data Analysis Project
 
GA4 Without Cookies [Measure Camp AMS]
GA4 Without Cookies [Measure Camp AMS]GA4 Without Cookies [Measure Camp AMS]
GA4 Without Cookies [Measure Camp AMS]
 
Predicting Salary Using Data Science: A Comprehensive Analysis.pdf
Predicting Salary Using Data Science: A Comprehensive Analysis.pdfPredicting Salary Using Data Science: A Comprehensive Analysis.pdf
Predicting Salary Using Data Science: A Comprehensive Analysis.pdf
 
NLP Data Science Project Presentation:Predicting Heart Disease with NLP Data ...
NLP Data Science Project Presentation:Predicting Heart Disease with NLP Data ...NLP Data Science Project Presentation:Predicting Heart Disease with NLP Data ...
NLP Data Science Project Presentation:Predicting Heart Disease with NLP Data ...
 
Call Girls in Saket 99530🔝 56974 Escort Service
Call Girls in Saket 99530🔝 56974 Escort ServiceCall Girls in Saket 99530🔝 56974 Escort Service
Call Girls in Saket 99530🔝 56974 Escort Service
 
dokumen.tips_chapter-4-transient-heat-conduction-mehmet-kanoglu.ppt
dokumen.tips_chapter-4-transient-heat-conduction-mehmet-kanoglu.pptdokumen.tips_chapter-4-transient-heat-conduction-mehmet-kanoglu.ppt
dokumen.tips_chapter-4-transient-heat-conduction-mehmet-kanoglu.ppt
 
RadioAdProWritingCinderellabyButleri.pdf
RadioAdProWritingCinderellabyButleri.pdfRadioAdProWritingCinderellabyButleri.pdf
RadioAdProWritingCinderellabyButleri.pdf
 
Effects of Smartphone Addiction on the Academic Performances of Grades 9 to 1...
Effects of Smartphone Addiction on the Academic Performances of Grades 9 to 1...Effects of Smartphone Addiction on the Academic Performances of Grades 9 to 1...
Effects of Smartphone Addiction on the Academic Performances of Grades 9 to 1...
 
Identifying Appropriate Test Statistics Involving Population Mean
Identifying Appropriate Test Statistics Involving Population MeanIdentifying Appropriate Test Statistics Involving Population Mean
Identifying Appropriate Test Statistics Involving Population Mean
 
ASML's Taxonomy Adventure by Daniel Canter
ASML's Taxonomy Adventure by Daniel CanterASML's Taxonomy Adventure by Daniel Canter
ASML's Taxonomy Adventure by Daniel Canter
 

Chapter 4,5

  • 2. DATA ANALYSIS & INTTERPRETATION The Balance Sheets which were collected from the organization for the last five years were the main source of data. The data was classified and tabulated for the purpose of analysis using ratio analysis and comparative analysis of balance sheet and percentage were drawn for the purpose of information generation and inferences were drawn. A. LIQUIDITY RATIOS 1. Current Ratio: A liquidity ratio that measures a company's ability to pay short- term obligations. Current Ratio = Current Asset Current Liabilities TABLE 4.1: CURRENT RATIOS (RS.IN CRORES) YEARS CURRENT ASSETS CURRENT LIABILITIES RATIOS 2011 20098.44 223219.93 0.09 2010 15776.69 184738.06 0.08 2009 15984.93 152235.16 0.10 2008 10097.84 116725.57 0.08 2007 8426.44 97488.01 0.08 ANALYSIS: The table above shows that in the year 2011 Current Ratio was 0.09 while in 2010 it was 0.12 whereas in 2009 was 0.10 while for the year 2008 was 0.08 whereas in 2007 Current Ratio was 0.08. GRAPH 4.1: CURRENT RATIOS
  • 3. INFERENCE: From the above graph it can be seen that in the year 2007 Current Ratio was 0.08 whereas in 2008 it remained constant to 0.09 while in 2009 it increased to 0.10 which is the highest whereas in 2010 it decreased to 0.08 which is the lowest while in 2010 it increased to 0.09. EARNINGS PER SHARE: The portion of a company's profit allocated to each outstanding share of common stock. Earnings per share serve as an indicator of a company's profitability. EPS = Net Profit after Tax
  • 4. No of Equity Shares TABLE 4.2: EARNING PER SHARE (RS.IN CRORES) YEARS PROFIT AFTER TAX NO OF EQUITY SHARES RATIOS 2011 2081.95 524699068 39.67 2010 2074.92 505294547 41.06 2009 1726.55 505324751 34.17 2008 1387.03 505228404 27.45 2007 845.39 505340501 16.72 ANALYSIS: The table above shows that in the year 2011 EPS was 39.67 while in 2010 it was 21.06 whereas in 2009 was 34.17 while for the year 2008 was 27.45 whereas in 2007 EPS was 16.72. GRAPH 4.2: EARNING PER SHARE
  • 5. INFERENCE: The earnings per share ratio is seen to be increasing from the year 2007 to 2010 which shows the company‘s efficiency of paying dividends to its shareholders while in 2011 it has again decreased. The ratio simply denotes the profit left with the firm after tax and amount paid against each share. The higher result denotes the higher amount paid against each share to the shareholders.The graph shows the good condition of the EPS and is satisfactory B. MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY RATIOS: 1. Interest Income to Total funds: The difference between the revenue that is generated from a bank's assets and the expenses associated with paying out its liabilities.
  • 6. Interest Income to Total funds = Interest Earned Total Funds TABLE 4.3: INTEREST INCOME TO TOTAL FUNDS (RS.IN CRORES) YEARS INTEREST EARNED TOTAL FUNDS RATIOS (%) 2011 16452.62 235984.45 6.97 2010 13302.68 195161.84 6.82 2009 11889.38 160975.52 7.38 2008 9447.30 124073.28 7.61 2007 7382.18 102677.88 7.18 ANALYSIS: The table above shows that in the year 2011 the Ratio was 6.97% while in 2010 it was 6.82% whereas in 2009 was 7.38% while for the year 2008 was 7.61% whereas in 2007 Ratio was 7.18%. GRAPH 4.3: INTEREST INCOME TO TOTAL FUNDS
  • 7. INFERENCE: From the above graph it can be seen that in the year 2007 Interest Income to Total Funds was 7.18% whereas in 2008 it was the highest with 7.61% while in 2009 it f decreased to 7.38% whereas in 2010 it further decreased to 6.82% which is the lowest while in 2011 it increased to 6.97%. 2. Operating Expense to Total Funds: A measure of a company's earning power from ongoing operations, equal to earnings before deduction of interest payments and income taxes. Also called EBIT or operating income. Operating Expense to Total Funds = Operating Expense Total Funds
  • 8. TABLE 4.4: OPERATING EXPENSE TO TOTAL FUNDS (RS.IN CRORES) YEARS OPERATING EXPENSE TOTAL FUNDS RATIOS (%) 2011 5137.69 235984.45 2.17 2010 3206.76 195161.84 1.64 2009 2760.59 160975.52 1.71 2008 2178.20 124073.28 1.02 2007 1805.92 102677.88 1.76 ANALYSIS: The table above shows that in the year 2011 the Ratio was 2.17% while in 2010 it was 1.64% whereas in 2009 was 1.71% while for the year 2008 was 1.02% whereas in 2007 Ratio was 1.76%. GRAPH 4.4: OPERATING EXPENSE TO TOTAL FUNDS
  • 9. INFERENCE: From the above graph it can be seen that in the year 2007 Operating Expense to Total Funds was 1.76% whereas in 2008 it decreased to 1.02% which is the lowest while in 2009 it increased to 1.71% whereas in 20010 it again decreased to 1.64% while in 2011 it was the highest with 2.17%. 3. Net Profit to Total funds: An indicator of how profitable a company is relative to its total assets. Net profit to total funds gives an idea as to how efficient management is at using its assets to generate earnings. Calculated by dividing a
  • 10. company's annual earnings by its total assets, Net profit to total funds is displayed as a percentage. Sometimes this is referred to as "return on investment". Net Profit to Total funds = Net Profit Total Funds TABLE 4.5: NET PROFIT TO TOTAL FUNDS (RS.IN CRORES) YEARS NET PROFIT TOTAL FUNDS RATIOS (%) 2011 2081.95 235984.45 0.88 2010 2074.92 195161.84 1.06 2009 1726.55 160975.52 1.07 2008 1387.03 124073.28 1.11 2007 845.39 102677.88 0.82 ANALYSIS: The table above shows that in the year 2011the Ratio was 0.88% while in 2010 it was 1.06% whereas in 2009 it was 1.07% while for the year 2008 it was 1.11% whereas in 2007 Ratio was 0.82%. GRAPH 4.5: NET PROFIT TO TOTAL FUNDS
  • 11. INFERENCE: From the above graph it can be seen that in the year 2007 Net Profit to Total Funds was the lowest with 0.82% whereas in 2008 it increased to 1.11% which is the highest while in 2009 it decreased to 1.07% whereas in 2010 it further decreased to 1.06% while in 2011 it decreased to 0.88%. C. PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT RATIOS
  • 12. 1. Interest Expanded to Interest earned: Interest earned is the interest generated but not yet credited or paid and Interest expanded is the interest provided to the creditors. Interest Expanded to Interest Earned = Interest Expanded Interest Earned TABLE 4.6: INTEREST EXPANDED TO INTEREST EARNED (RS. IN CRORES) YEARS INTEREST EXPANDED INTEREST EARNED RATIOS (%) 2011 10236.42 16452.62 62.21 2010 9110.27 13302.68 68.48 2009 8075.81 11889.38 67.92 2008 6360.95 9447.30 67.33 2007 4591.96 7382.18 62.20 ANALYSIS: The table above shows that in the year 2011 the Ratio was 62.21% while in 2010 it was 68.48% whereas in 2009 it was 67.92% while for the year 2008 it was 67.33% whereas in 2007 Ratio was 62.20%. GRAPH 4.6: INTEREST EXPANDED TO INTEREST EARNED
  • 13. INFERENCE: From the above graph it can be seen that in the year 2007 the Interest expanded to interest earned was 62.22% whereas in 2008 it increased to 67.33% while in 2009 it further increased to 67.92% whereas in 2010 it again increased to 68.48% which is the highest while in 2011 it was the lowest with 62.21%.
  • 14. 2. Operating Expense to Total Income: A category of expenditure that a business incurs as a result of performing its normal business operations. Operating Expense to Total Income = Operating Expense Total income TABLE 4.7: OPERATING EXPENSE TO TOTAL INCOME (RS.IN CRORES) YEARS OPERATING EXPENSE TOTAL INCOME RATIOS (%) 2011 5137.69 18491.40 27.78 2010 3206.76 15277.42 20.99 2009 2760.59 13371.93 20.64 2008 2178.20 10679.97 20.39 2007 1805.92 8223.98 21.95 ANALYSIS: The table above shows that in the year 2011 the Ratio was 27.78% while in 2010 it was 20.99% whereas in 2009 was 20.64% while for the year 2008 was 20.39% whereas in 2007 Ratio was 21.95%. GRAPH 4.7: OPERATING EXPENSE TO TOTAL INCOME
  • 15. INFERENCE: From the above graph it can be seen that in the year 2007 the Operating expense to total income was 21.95% whereas in 2008 it decreased to 20.39% which is the lowest while in 2009 it increased to 20.64% whereas in 2010 it further increased to 20.99% while in 2011 it increased to the highest with 27.78%. D. PROFITABILITY RATIOS
  • 16. 1. Net Profit Margin: A ratio of profitability calculated as net income divided by revenues, or net profits divided by sales. Net Profit Margin = Net Profit Total Income TABLE 4.8: NET PROFIT MARGIN (RS.IN CRORES) YEARS NET PROFIT TOTAL INCOME RATIOS (%) 2011 2081.95 18491.40 11.25 2010 2074.92 15277.42 13.58 2009 1726.55 13371.93 12.91 2008 1387.03 10679.97 12.98 2007 845.39 8223.98 10.27 ANALYSIS: The table above shows that in the year 2011 Net Profit Margin was 11.25% while in 2010 it was 13.58% whereas in 2009 was 12.91% while for the year 2008 was 12.98% whereas in 2007 Net Profit Margin was 10.27%. GRAPH 4.8: NET PROFIT MARGIN
  • 17. INFERENCE: From the above graph it can be seen in the year 2007 Net Profit Margin was 10.27% which is the lowest whereas in 2008 it increased to 12.98% while in 2009 it decreased to 12.91% whereas in 2010 it reached to the highest with 13.58% while in 2011 it again decreased to 11.25%. 2. Return on Net worth: Ratio of net income after taxes to total end of the year Net Worth. This ratio indicates the return on stockholder's total equity.
  • 18. Return on Net worth = Net Profit Net worth TABLE 4.9: RETURN ON NET WORTH (RS.IN CRORES) YEARS NET PROFIT NET WORTH RATIOS (%) 2011 2081.95 12764.52 16.31 2010 2074.92 10423.78 19.90 2009 1726.55 8740.36 19.75 2008 1387.03 7347.71 18.87 2007 845.39 5189.87 16.28 ANALYSIS: The table above shows that in the year 2011 Return On Net Worth was 16.31% while in 2010 it was 19.90% whereas in 2009 it was 19.75% while for the year 2008 it was 18.87% whereas in 2007 Return On Net Worth was 16.28%. GRAPH 4.9: RETURN ON NET WORTH
  • 19. INFERENCE: From the above graph it can be seen that in the year 2007 Return on Net Worth was the lowest with16.28% whereas in 2008 it increased to 18.87% while in 2009 it further increased to 19.75% whereas in 2010 it increased to 19.90 % which was the highest while in 2011 it again decreased to 16.31%. . E. INVESTMENT VALUATION RATIOS 1. Dividend Per Share: The amount of dividend that a stockholder will receive for each share of stock held. It can be calculated by taking the total amount of dividends paid and dividing it by the total shares outstanding. Dividend Per Share = Equity Dividend
  • 20. No. of Share TABLE 4.10: DIVIDEND PER SHARE (RS.IN CRORES) ANALYSIS: The table above shows that in the year 2011 Dividend per Share was 80.00 while in 2010 and 2009 it was 50.00 whereas in 2008 was 40.00 while for the year 2007 Dividend per share was 30.00. GRAPH 4.10: DIVIDEND PER SHARE YEARS EQUITY DIVIDEND NO. OF SHARES RATIOS 2011 419.47 524699068 80.00 2010 277.81 505294547 50.00 2009 252.56 505324751 50.00 2008 202.05 5052284049 40.00 2007 176.79 505340501 30.00
  • 21. INFERENCE: From the above graph it can be seen that in the year 2007 Dividend per Share was the lowest i.e. 30.00. It has increased gradually and reached the highest in the year 2011 with 80.00 per share. 2. Net Operating Profit Per Share: A measure of a company's earning power from ongoing operations, equal to earnings before deduction of interest payments and income taxes. Also called EBIT or operating income. Net Operating Profit per Share = Net Operating Profit
  • 22. No of Shares TABLE 4.11: NET OPERATING PROFIT PER SHARE (RS.IN CRORES) YEARS NET OPERARING PROFIT NO. OF SHARES RATIOS 2011 13353.71 524699068 254.50 2010 12070.66 505294547 238.88 2009 10611.34 505324751 209.99 2008 8501.77 505228404 168.27 2007 7138.06 505340501 141.25 ANALYSIS: The table above shows that in the year 2011 Net operating Profit per Share was 254.50 while in 2010 it was 238.88 whereas in 2009 it was 209.99 while for the year 2008 it was 168.27 whereas in 2007 Net operating Profit per share was 141.25. GRAPH 4.11: NET OPERATING PROFIT
  • 23. INFERENCE The above graph shows that the Net operating profit per share in 2007 is 141.25% which is the lowest while in 2008 it has increased to 168.27%, whereas in 2009 it has again increased to 209.99%, while in 2010 it has slightly increased to 238.88% whereas in 2011 it is the highest with 254.50%. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS TABLE 4.12: COMPARITIVE BALANCE SHEET AS ON 31ST MARCH, 2007
  • 25. PARTICULARS AS ON Mar 2008 AS ON Mar 2007 INC OR DEC % INC OR DEC SHAREHOLDER’S FUND Capital 505.12 505.12 0 0 Reserves and Surplus 6842.59 4684.75 2157.84 46.06 TOTAL 7347.71 5189.87 2157.84 41.57 FIXED ASSETS Gross Block 2937.45 1487.21 1450.24 6.55 Less: Depreciation 741.62 664.49 77.13 11.60 Net Block 2195.83 822.72 1373.11 166.89 Cap. Work–in-progress 4.57 2.28 2.29 100.43 Other Assets 3604.10 3058.24 545.86 17.85 9483.57 6034.94 3448.63 57.14 INVESTMENTS 33822.63 27981.77 5840.86 20.87 CURRENT ASSETS Cash & Balances with RBI 9454.74 5917.57 3537.17 59.77 Balance with Banks, Money at Call 643.10 2508.87 (1865.77) 74.36 Advances 74348.29 62386.43 11961.86 19.17 84446.13 70812.87 13633.26 19.25 Less: CURRENTLIABILITIES Deposits 103858.65 85180.22 18678.43 21.93 Borrowings 4760.49 4215.53 544.96 12.93 Other Liabilities & 8106.43 8092.26 14.17 .2
  • 26. INFERENCE The Comparative balance sheet shows that during the year 2008 the Net worth has increased by Rs.2157.84 Cr. i.e. 41.57% as there has been an increase in Reserve and Surplus. Fixed Assets have grown by Rs.3448.63 Cr. i.e. 57.14%. Investment has increased by 20.87%. Net Current Assets have decreased by Rs.5604.3 Cr. i.e. 21.00% resulting into a weak liquidity position of the company TABLE 4.13: COMPARITIVE BALANCE SHEET AS ON 31ST MARCH, 2008 (RS.IN CRORES)
  • 27. PARTICULARS AS ON Mar 2009 AS ON Mar 2008 INC OR DEC % INC OR DEC SHAREHOLDER’S FUND Capital 505.12 505.12 0 0 Reserves and Surplus 8235.24 6842.59 1392.65 20.35 TOTAL 8704.36 7347.71 1356.65 18.46 FIXED ASSETS Gross Block 3220.65 2937.45 283.2 9.64 Less: Depreciation 893.35 741.62 151.73 20.45 Net Block 2327.30 2195.83 131.47 5.98 Cap.Work–in-progress 7.86 4.57 3.29 71.99 Other Assets 3124.23 3604.10 (479.87) 13.31 9573.39 9483.57 89.82 0.9 INVESTMENTS 42996.96 33822.63 9174.33 27.12 CURRENT ASSETS Cash & Balances with RBI 8992.05 9454.74 (462.69) 4.89 Balance with Banks, Money at Call 6992.88 643.10 6349.78 987.3 Advances 96534.23 74348.29 22185.94 29.84 112519.6 84446.13 28073.03 33.24 Less: CURRENTLIABILITIES
  • 28. INFERENCE The Comparative balance sheet shows that during the year 2008 the Net worth has increased by Rs.1356.65 Cr. i.e. 18.46% and Reserve and Surplus, 20.35%. Fixed Assets have grown by Rs.89.82 Cr. i.e. 0.9%Investment has increased by 27.12%. Current Assets have increased by 33.24% and there have been an increase in Current Liabilities by 30.42%. As a result Net Current Assets has decreased by Rs.13040.42 i.e. 48.88% which shows a weak liquidity position of the company.
  • 29. TABLE 4.14: COMPARITIVE BALANCE SHEET AS ON 31ST MARCH, 2009 (RS.IN CRORES)
  • 30. PARTICULARS AS ON Mar 2010 AS ON Mar 2009 INC OR DEC % INC OR DEC SHAREHOLDER’S FUND Capital 505.12 505.12 0 0 Reserves and Surplus 9918.66 8235.24 1683.42 20.44 TOTAL 10423.78 8704.36 1719.42 19.75 FIXED ASSETS Gross Block 3396.98 3220.65 176.33 5.47 Less: Depreciation 1101.5 893.35 208.15 23.29 Net Block 2295.48 2327.3 -31.82 -1.36 Cap.Work–in-progress 9.96 7.86 2.1 26.71 Other Assets 3360.89 3124.23 236.66 7.57 10164.81 9573.39 591.42 6.17 INVESTMENTS 54403.53 42996.96 11406.57 26.52 CURRENT ASSETS Cash & Balances with RBI 12468.24 8992.05 3476.19 38.65 Balance with Banks, Money at Call 3308.45 6992.88 -3684.43 -52.68 Advances 119315.3 96534.23 22781.07 23.59 135091.99 112519.6 22572.39 20.06 Less: CURRENTLIABILITIES Deposits 170039.74 138702.83 31336.91 22.59
  • 31. INFERENCE The Comparative balance sheet shows that during the year 2010 the Net worth has increased by Rs.1719.42 i.e.19.75% and Reserve and Surplus, 20.44%. Fixed Assets have decreased by Rs.591.42Cr. i.e. 6.17%. Investment has increased by 26.52%.Current Assets have increased by 20.06% and there have been an increase in Current Liabilities by 21.35%. As a result Net Current Assets has decreased by Rs.9930.51Cr. i.e. 25.00% which shows a weak liquidity position of the company.
  • 32. TABLE 4.15: COMPARITIVE BALANCE SHEET AS ON 31STMARCH, 2010 (RS.IN CRORES) PARTICULARS AS ON Mar 2011 AS ON Mar 2010 INC OR DEC % INC OR DEC SHAREHOLDER’S FUND Capital 635.33 505.12 130.21 25.77 Reserves and Surplus 12129.19 9918.66 2210.53 22.28 TOTAL 12764.52 10423.78 2340.74 22.45 FIXED ASSETS 0 Gross Block 3598.41 3396.98 201.43 5.92 Less: Depreciation 1319.21 1101.5 217.71 19.76 Net Block 2279.2 2295.48 -16.28 -0.70 Cap.Work–in-progress 13.58 9.96 3.62 36.34 Other Assets 4208 3360.89 847.11 25.20
  • 33. 11418.4 10164.81 1253.59 12.33 INVESTMENTS 58339.14 54403.53 3935.61 7.23 CURRENT ASSETS Cash & Balances with RBI 17610.45 12468.24 5142.21 41.24 Balance with Banks, Money at Call 2487.99 3308.45 -820.46 -24.79 Advances 150986.08 119315.3 31670.78 26.54 171084.52 135091.99 35992.53 26.64 Less: CURRENTLIABILITIES Deposits 202461.29 170039.74 32421.55 19.06 Borrowings 13315.97 9215.31 4100.66 44.49 Other Liabilities & Provisions 7442.67 5483.01 1959.66 35.74 223219.93 184738.06 38481.87 20.83 Net Current Assets -52135.41 -49646.07 -2489.34 5.01 TOTAL 12764.52 10423.78 2340.74 22.45
  • 34. INFERENCE The Comparative balance sheet shows that during the year 2011 the Net worth has increased by Rs.2340.74 Cr. i.e. 24.55% as there has been an increase in Reserve and Surplus, 22.28%. Fixed Assets have increased by Rs.1253.59Cr. i.e. 12.33%. Investment has increased by 7.23 %. Current Assets have increased by 26.64% and there have been an increase in Current Liabilities by 20.83%. As a result Net Current Assets has increased by Rs.2489.34 Cr. i.e. 5.01% resulting into an weak liquidity position of the company.
  • 35. TABLE 4.16: COMPARITIVE INCOME STATEMENT AS ON MARCH, 2007 (RS.IN CRORES)
  • 36. PARTICULARS AS ON Mar 2008 AS ON Mar 2007 INC OR DEC % INC OR DEC INCOME Interest Earned 9447.3 7382.18 2065.12 27.97 Other Income 1232.67 841.8 390.87 46.43 TOTAL 10679.97 8223.96 2456.01 29.86 EXPENDITURE Interest Expanded 6360.95 4591.96 1768.99 38.52 Employee Cost 845.68 873.8 -28.12 -3.21 Selling & Administrative Expenses 946.34 620.16 326.18 52.59 Miscellaneous Expenses 1038.15 1206.3 -168.15 -13.93 Operating Expenses 2178.2 1805.92 372.28 20.61 Provisions & Contingencies 753.79 980.71 -226.92 -23.13 TOTAL 33483.05 26526.79 6956.26 26.22 PROFIT BEFORE DEPRECIATION 1488.85 931.76 557.09 59.78 Depreciation 101.82 86.37 15.45 17.88 NET PROFIT FOR THE YEAR 1387.03 845.39 541.64 64.06
  • 37. INFERENCE The Comparative Income Statement shows that during the year 2008 the Total Income has increased by Rs.2456.01 Cr. i.e. 29.86% as there has been an increase in Interest Earned, 27.97% and Other Income, 46.43%. Total Expenditure has increased by Rs.6956.26 i.e. 26.22% .Depreciation has increased by 15.45 %. Net Profit has increased by Rs.541.64 Cr. i.e. 64.06%. TABLE 4.17: COMPARITIVE INCOME STATEMENT AS ON MARCH, 2008 (RS.IN CRORES)
  • 38. PARTICULARS AS ON Mar 2009 AS ON Mar 2008 INC OR DEC % INC OR DEC INCOME Interest Earned 11889.38 9447.3 2442.08 25.84 Other Income 1482.55 1232.67 249.88 20.27 TOTAL 13371.93 10679.97 2691.96 25.20 EXPENDITURE Interest Expanded 8075.81 6360.95 1714.86 26.95 Employee Cost 1152.36 845.68 306.68 36.26 Selling & Administrative Expenses 1082.54 946.34 136.2 14.39 Miscellaneous Expenses 1198.08 1038.15 159.93 15.40 Operating Expenses 2760.59 2178.2 582.39 26.73 Provisions & Contingencies 808.97 753.79 55.18 7.32 TOTAL 41822.21 33483.05 8339.16 24.90 PROFIT BEFORE DEPRECIATION 1863.13 1488.85 374.28 25.13 Depreciation 136.58 101.82 34.76 34.13 NET PROFIT FOR THE YEAR 1726.55 1387.03 339.52 24.47
  • 39. INFERENCE The Comparative Income Statement shows that during the year 2009 the Total Income has increased by Rs.2691.96 Cr. i.e. 25.20% as there has been an increase in Interest Earned, 25.84% and Other Income, 20.27%. Total Expenditure has increased by Rs.8339.16 i.e. 24.90% Depreciation has increased by 34.13%. Net Profit has increased by Rs.339.52 Cr. i.e. 24.47 TABLE 4.18: COMPARITIVE INCOME STATEMENT AS ON MARCH, 2009 (RS.IN CRORES)
  • 40. PARTICULARS AS ON Mar 2010 AS ON Mar 2009 INC OR DEC % INC OR DEC INCOME Interest Earned 13302.68 11889.38 1413.3 11.88 Other Income 1974.74 1482.55 492.19 33.19 TOTAL 15277.42 13371.93 1905.49 14.24 EXPENDITURE Interest Expanded 9110.27 8075.81 1034.46 12.80 Employee Cost 1354.99 1152.36 202.63 17.58 Selling & Administrative Expenses 1225.57 1082.54 143.03 13.21 Miscellaneous Expenses 1351.53 1198.08 153.45 12.80 Operating Expenses 3206.76 2760.59 446.17 16.16 Provisions & Contingencies 885.47 808.97 76.5 9.45 TOTAL 47689.43 41822.21 5867.22 14.02 PROFIT BEFORE DEPRECIATION 2235.06 1863.13 371.93 19.96 Depreciation 160.14 136.58 23.56 17.24 NET PROFIT FOR THE YEAR 2074.92 1726.55 348.37 20.17723205
  • 41. INFERENCE The Comparative Income Statement shows that during the year 2010 the Total Income has increased by Rs. 1905.49 Cr. i.e. 14.24% as there has been an increase in Interest Earned, 11.88% and Other Income, 33.19%. Total Expenditure has increased by 14.02% .Depreciation has increased by 17.24%. Net Profit has increased by Rs. 348.37 Cr. i.e. 20.17%. TABLE 4.19: COMPARITIVE INCOME STATEMENT AS ON MARCH, 2010 (RS.IN CRORES)
  • 42. PARTICULARS AS ON Mar 2011 AS ON Mar 2010 INC OR DEC % INC OR DEC INCOME Interest Earned 16452.62 13302.68 3149.94 23.67 Other Income 2038.78 1974.74 64.04 3.24 TOTAL 18491.4 15277.42 3213.98 21.03 EXPENDITURE Interest Expanded 10236.42 9110.27 1126.15 12.36 Employee Cost 2600.25 1354.99 1245.26 91.90 Selling & Administrative Expenses 1814.19 1225.57 588.62 48.02 Miscellaneous Expenses 1602.94 1351.53 251.41 18.60 Operating Expenses 5137.69 3206.76 1930.93 60.21 Provisions & Contingencies 1035.35 885.47 149.88 16.92 TOTAL 59409.64 47689.43 11720.21 24.57 PROFIT BEFORE DEPRECIATION 2237.61 2235.06 2.55 0.11 Depreciation 155.66 160.14 -4.48 -2.79 NET PROFIT FOR THE YEAR 2081.95 2074.92 7.03 0.33
  • 43. INFERENCE The Comparative Income Statement shows that during the year 2010 the Total Income has increased by Rs. 3213.98 Cr. i.e. 21.03% as there has been an increase in Interest Earned, 23.67% and Other Income, 21.03%. Total Expenditure has increased by Rs.11720.21 i.e. 24.57% .Depreciation has decreased by 2.79%. Net Profit has increased by Rs. 7.03 Cr. i.e. 0.33%. TABLE 4.20: TREND ANALYSIS (BALANCE SHEET) (RS.IN CRORES)
  • 44. PARTICULARS 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 SHAREHOLDER’S FUND Capital 100 100 119.99 120.63 120.63 Reserves and Surplus 100 113.48 178.49 211.35 240.85 TOTAL 100 113.22 177.37 209.62 238.57 FIXED ASSETS Gross Block 100 108.58 121.06 140.11 159.35 Less: Depreciation 100 113.01 123.09 143.71 162.36 Net Block 100 100.14 117.44 133.72 154.04 Cap.Work–in- progress 100 117.85 293.49 330.04 369.81 Other Assets 100 113.01 198.46 168.60 156.89 100 111.85 190.11 165.40 157.26 INVESTMENTS 100 91.76 116.59 169.78 175.83 CURRENT ASSETS Cash & Balances with RBI 100 134.29 238.01 256.33 283.06 Balance with Banks, Money at Call 100 99.93 69.55 213.88 152.32 Advances 100 128.93 159.29 207.20 241.52 100 127.14 158.14 211.27 237.78 Less: CURRENTLIABILITIES Deposits 100 114.60 141.40 195.26 211.58 Borrowings 100 129.57 168.82 175.30 336.19
  • 45. INFERENCE OF TREND ANALYSIS The trend analysis is calculated by taking 2007 as base year in which increase and decrease of unit‘s assets and liabilities are reflected. The Shareholders Funds have continuously increased in all the years up to 2011. The percentage in 2011 is 238.57 as compared to 100 0n 2007. The Fixed Assets have grown upwards to 190.11% in the year 2009. Then, have decreased to 157.26% in 2011. Investments have decreased to 91.76% in 2008 and increased to 175.83% in 2011. The Current Assets have continuously increased in all the years up to 2011. The percentage in 2011 is 237.78 as compared to 100 0n 2007. The Current Liabilities also have continuously increased in all the years up to 2011. The percentage in 2011 is 211.80 as compared to 100 0n 2007. The Net Current Assets have increased to 109.63% in 2008 and decreased to 61.69% in 2011.
  • 46.
  • 47. TABLE 4.21: TREND ANALYSIS (INCOME STATEMENT) (RS.IN CRORES) INFERENCE OF TREND ANALYSIS PARTICULARS 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 INCOME Interest Earned 100 110.33 136.75 178.21 198.34 Other Income 100 100.79 127.20 171.77 202.58 TOTAL 100 108.69 135.12 177.10 199.06 EXPENDITURE Interest Expanded 100 116.23 158.38 212.80 234.74 Employee Cost 100 97.65 95.64 119.99 157.02 Selling & Administrative Expenses 100 175.42 224.78 276.37 426.16 Miscellaneous Expenses 100 90.66 89.21 111.35 99.69 Operating Expenses 100 111.61 123.05 125.65 210.06 Provisions & Contingencies 100 84.63 75.33 93.70 67.20 TOTAL 100 109.84 133.88 175.03 199.39 PROFIT BEFORE DEPRECIATION 100 100.15 144.26 192.46 196.63 Depreciation 100 82.63 93.26 104.66 127.91 NET PROFIT FOR THE YEAR 100 103.05 152.70 206.99 208.00
  • 48. The trend analysis is calculated by taking 2007 as base year in which increase and decrease of unit‘s income and expenses are reflected. The total income has continuously increased in all the years up to 2011. The percentage in 2011 is 199.06 as compared to 100 0n 2007. The total expenditure also has continuously increased in all the years up to 2011. The percentage in 2011 is 199.39 as compared to 100 0n 2007. The operating expenses have continuously increased in all the years up to 2011. The percentage in 2011 is 210.06 as compared to 100 0n 2007. The comparative increase in 2011 is much higher as it has increased to 210.06% from 125.65% in 2010. The net profit has continuously increased in all the years up to 2011. The percentage in 2011 is 208.00 as compared to 100 in 2007. The growth of the firm is good and it has doubled its profits in just five years’ time.
  • 49. CHAPTER 5 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SUMMARY OF FINDINGS & CONCLUSION
  • 50. THE SUMMARY OF FINDINGS OF THE STUDY IS INDICATED BELOW 1. The company has been maintaining a constant Current Ratio. It has remained same at 0.08 in 2007, 2008, 2011 but it has slightly increased in 2009 and 2011. 2. The Earning per Share trend is increasing in nature as it has increased to 39.67 in 2011 from 16.72 in 2007. 3. The Interest Income to Total Funds Ratio is fluctuating and has decreased from 7.18 percent in 2007 to 6.82 percent in 2011 and then slightly increased in 2011. 4. The Operating Expense to Total Income is varying and has increased from 2007 in 21.95 percent to 27.78 percent in 2011. Net Profit Margin is fluctuating. In 2007 it was 10.27 percent and has increased to 11.25 percent in 2011 5. The Net Profit to Total Funds ratio is varying in nature and has increased from 0.82 percent in 2007 to 0.88 percent in 2011. 6. The Interest Expanded to Interest Earned can be said increasing in nature as it has increased from 62.20 percent in 2007 to 68.48 percent in 2011 but has decreased to 62.21 percent in 2011. 7. The operating expenses have continuously increased in all the years up to 2011. The percentage in 2011 is 210.06 as compared to 100 0n 2007.
  • 51. 8. The net profit has continuously increased in all the years up to 2011. The percentage in 2011 is 208.00 as compared to 100 in 2007. The growth of the firm is good and it has doubled its profits in just five years’ time. 9. The Return on Net Worth is varying in nature and it has increased from 16.28 percent in 2007 to 16.31 percent in 2011. 10. The trend of Dividend per Share is increasing in nature. Dividend per Share has increased from 30 in 2007 to 80 in 2011. 11.The Shareholder‘s Funds have increasing trend as it has increased by 238.57 percent i.e. the company has doubled its shareholder‘s funds in a period of five years. 12. The Fixed Assets have fluctuating trend .It has increased by 157.26 percent. 13. The Investments have increased by 175.83 percent. 14. The Net Current Assets can be said decreasing in nature. It has decreased to 61.69 percent as compared to 100 in 2007. 15.The Total Income of the Company has been increasing and has reached to 199.06 percent in 2011.
  • 52. CONCLUSION The important of the financial statement analysis lies in the fact that it presents facts on a comparative basis and enables the drawing of inferences regarding the performance of the firms. The comparative statement analysis is relevant in assessing the performance of a business concern as it adds meaning to the financial data and it is also used to effectively measure the conduct of the business activities. And trend analysis also has its own importance as a trend analysis indicates in which direction a business is moving i.e. upward or downwards and it gives a better picture of the overall performance of the business and its also helps in analyzing the financial performance over a period of time. On other hand, with the help of ratio analysis conclusion can be drawn regarding the liquidity position of the company. The liquidity ratios are useful in credit analysis by banks and other suppliers of short term loans. Ratios analysis is equally useful for assessing the long term financial viability of a firm. The long term solvency is measured by the leverage and profitability ratios which focus on earning power and operating efficiency. Ratio analysis reveals the strength and weaknesses of a company in this respect. The leverage ratios will indicate whether a firm has a reasonable proposition of various sources of finance or whether heavily loaded with debt in which case its
  • 53. solvency is exposed to serious strain. The various profitability ratios would reveals whether or not the firm is able to offer adequate return to its owner consistent with the risk involved. Thus, Financial Statement Analysis has application and is of immense use today. Financial Statement Analysis is extremely helpful in providing valuable insight into a company‘s financial picture. It can point out whether the financial conditions are strong, good, questionable or poor. Financial Statement Analysis provides an easy way to compare present performance with the past.