http://www.aoico.it
XIII Congresso Nazionale AOICO - Cava de’Tirreni (SA)
Seconda parte della Relazione tenuta dal dott. Antonio Della Volpe sulla indicazione all'impianto cocleare.
26. Facial Nerve Anomalies
common (14%) and
associated with:
CC and HC
anomalous stapes
nerve can split proximally
facial nerve monitor essential
28. Re-implantation
device failure
device infection
(leave array in cochlea if
possible)
29. Re-implantation
tips
be prepared to drill around
cochleostomy
insert new array
immediately old array
removed
straight array narrower but
more flexible
30. Choice of electrode array
Indications
Options
general use, atraumatic
Pre-curved AOS insertion
incomplete partition
Straight
hearing preservation
Short
apical stimulation
Long
ossified cochleae
Double or split
31. Conclusion
keys to success are:
appropriate selection of the patient
fixation of the receiver stimulator
identification of landmarks for round
window/cochleostomy
care with abnormal cochleae
appropriate selection of the electrode
32. CONCLUSIONS 2
CI is generally possible in cases with inner ear malformations
Variable results (neural function) generally satisfactory results
Facial nerve anomalies
Surgical issues •surgical access Cochlear anomalies
•CSF gusher (difficult to radiologically predict)
•type of array
•array placement misplacement in the IAC (++IP I, IP III, CC, CH)
Programming difficulties / facial nerve electrical stimulation
Fenestral CSF fistula (++)
Higher risk of post-op. meningitis
CSF fistula at cochleostomy site (--)
33. Cochlear nerve aplasia-hypoplasia is not uncommon(unilateral ++)
Cochlear nerve aplasia associated to a normal labirynth is possible
A severely narrowed IAC (2 mm) indicates a severe hypoplasia of the cochleo-vestibular
nerve, but not a sure absence of the cochlear nerve (if the cochlear duct is present and the
labirynth is malformed, the possibility of a functioning cochlear nerve is higher)
A normal IAC does not garantee the presence of a normal cochleo-vestibular nerve
(unilateral cases, parasagittal reconstructions)
The outcome after CI in pts with aplasia-hypoplasia of the cochlear n. are generally scarce
Certain advantages of some electrode designsWe use perimodiolar electrodes: patient benefit primarily longer battery lifeWe like advance off stylette re likelihood of less trauma within the cochlea.Our recent fellow Arie Gordon showed improved speech perception outcomes with more recent electrodes and insertion techniques, which we think may be due to reduction in traumaShort for electro-acoustic stimulationSoft surgery, concentrating on scala tympani insertion may contribute to preservation of residual hearing, and here role of short arrays expanding – perhaps soon in children – thought have to consider the implications of progressive hearing loss and the potential difficulty of replacing with a longer array in the futureDouble array for ossificationWe may see other array designs in near futureNot always clear if one design is any better than another, but some scenarios where particular design is advantageous