3. Regular composites ….. with
lower filler contents (≤ 60 wt%)
The material flows readily
Higher polymerization shrinkage
Lower mechanical properties
Higher wear rates
Used only as
1. Cavity liners
2. Fissure sealants
3. To restore small class V cavities
8. utilizes different filler systems
1. Fibers
2. Trimodal particle distrebution (interlock at the time of packing)
3. Non-slumping fillers
4. Resin impregnated fillers
But, the increased viscosity ↑ incidence of void formation
↓ reduce the adaptability
Usually used in combination with flowable liners
Has the ability to be packed like amalgam
Better contact with the adjacent teeth
Better occlusal form
10. It is a kind of ion-releasing composites
It releases fluoride, hydroxyl and calcium ions, when
the pH in areas adjacent to the restoration drops down
(e.g. plaque accumulation)
Recent materials are based on alkaline glass fillers.
The release of alkaline ions helps in;
1. Inhibiting bacterial growth
2. Buffering the acids produced by bacteria
3. Reduce the incidence of recurrent caries (Reduce the demineralization)
12. The development of minimal-shrink composites
was based on ….
1. Increasing the filler load
Using prepolymerized composite fillers
Using nano-sized fillers (Tetric
Evoceram, Ivoclar-Vivadent)
2. Using organic matrices with lower
polymerization shrinkage
Spiro-orthocarbonate, can produce
composites with no setting contraction,
Oxy bis-methacrylates (bifunctional
monomer) shows also a reduced rate of
the polymerization contraction
Oxirane and silorane-based monomers
(Feltick LS, 3M-ESPE)
15. To have a kind of modified composite having the
main advantages of glass ionomer cement.
Compositional modifications
Certain liquid monomer (HEMA) is modified by polyacrylic acid grafts
Filler particles similar to the powder of glass ionomer cement
(calcium- fluoro-alumino-silicate- glass)
Drawbacks:
Using bonding systems still mandatory
Lower wear resistant < regular composites
Insignificant release of fluoride
16. Flexure strength
Taher NM. Comparative study of composite, compomer and ormocer bi-axial flexural
strength. Saudi Dent. J. (2002) 14:7-10.
Compomers
17.
18. To overcome some drawbacks of compomers
The filler particles are a kind of
pre-polymerized glass ionomer
agglomerates
Giomers are fluoride releasing light-cured restoratives. They show
a true hybridization of glass ionomers and composites as they
have the fluoride release and recharge of glass ionomers and the
aesthetics, handling and physical properties of composite resins.
http://www.shofu.com.sg/GiomerList.aspx
19. Rationale
To get restorations with higher mechanical properties
To reduce the subsequent effect of the polymerization shrinkage
(i.e. weak bonding, microleakage, improper contact)
Indirect composite restorations
20. Chair-side
Start with Light or
chemical-curing inside
the mouth.
Then apply post-curing
heat or light treatment
CAD-CAM
composites
Laboratory
Cured with
heat & pressure
or light & pressure
on a cast
Fiber-reinforced
composites
22. First Generation
Firstly introduced in 1980s as an attempt to
decrease the rate of the polymerization shrinkage and Improve
the wear resistance of the restoration.
ManufacturerProduct commercial name
3M-ESPE1. Visio-gem
Kulzer2. Denta Color
Ivoclar-Vivadent3. Concept
Ivoclar-Vivadent4. Isoset
23. Second Generation
Appeared in 1990s and named ceromers. Most of these
materials are light-cured over a cast for 60 seconds and then
followed with heat treatment.
ManufacturerProduct commercial name
Heraeus-Kulzer1. Artglass
Kerr2. BelleGlass
Ivoclar-Vivadent3. Targis
3M-ESPE4. Simphony
25. In many aerospace, automotive, marine, household
and recreational industries … etc
26. Fiber-reinforced Dental Composites
Composites of the 2nd generation reinforced with fiber substructure
Good alternative to all and metal-ceramic restorations
- Braid
- Unidirectional- Mesh
- Weave
27. Dental applications of FRC
1. FRC endodontic post
2. Reinforcing denture bases
3. Implant frameworks
4. Bases of orthodontic appliances
5. Fixed prosthesis
6. Periodontal splints.