MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
Practical experiences of portfolio management
1. Portfolio Management Specific Interest Group
Andy Ingleby
Essentials, Operations, AstraZeneca
20th March 2012
Practical Experiences of
Portfolio Management
3. Objective : Share the learning from our Journey to date
…………so it can be applied!!
• Journey of Continuous Improvement in one part of AstraZeneca – AZ
Essentials
• Focus on Portfolio Management but within the context of other P3
improvement
- Governance
- Project & Programme Management
- Benefits Management
• Initiated in April 2009…..a Journey that has evolved……and continues
• No claim to be class leading…….typical of many organisations?
3
4. What is AZ Essentials?
• Global/Regional Operations Service delivery Organisation
• ~1000 employees + additional outsourced service providers
• A diverse set of capabilities including:
- Facilities Management (Hard & Soft services)
- Safety, Health, Environment & Wellbeing
- Engineering Projects
- Engineering Technology
- Real Estate
- Security
- Operational Excellence
• Very variable P3 maturity in 2009/10
4
5. What were our drivers for change?
• AstraZeneca payer and government price pressures
• Increasingly more challenging regulatory environment
• At Essentials level - desire to better understand & track delivery of
strategy
• Need for greater demonstration of value & visibility of
project/programme delivery & performance across diverse set of
functions
• Need to ensure success by ensuring we have the right skills &
capabilities delivering the right change for both our customers &
ourselves
• Clear Sponsorship & Functional Leadership
5 Name, Department
6. Essentials P3 Governance Network
Mission/Purpose:
• Create a visible Essentials Portfolio – to represent P3 delivery across the AZ Essentials organization (and any
associated groups)
• Identify, agree and establish best P3 practice & Governance in the Essentials functions
• Provide assurance to the Essentials board and it’s customer groups that P3 delivery (across the entire change lifecycle)
is to the highest standards
• Establish performance monitoring (KPI’s) within/across capabilities, and identify opportunities for Continuous
Improvement in P3 processes
• Benefits Realisation - Ensure processes are in place to define and realise benefits from P3 management
• Support decision making - enable the Essentials board to make the best decisions on their portfolio – via the PMO
Vision:
‘To ensure Essentials Projects and Programmes are delivered to industry leading
standards within all functions’
6
7. How did we start :
Use of Results Oriented Management (ROM)
• Whole ROM process understands problems and seeks commitment - avoiding talking
shop
• Driving performance improvement using KPI’s
• Governance network : One team member from each functional area
• Key problem identification and prioritised selection
• Problem analysis, identification of the current state and clear desired outcomes
• 3 month improvement plans via face to face Business Control Meetings (BCM’s)
• Intermediate progress/coaching meetings (Telecon)
- On track/Medium deviation/Large deviation……actions plans
• Reflections and learning at the end of each 3 month period
• Process facilitated by ROM specialist
• Quite process intense……not everyone comfortable with it!
7
8. Portfolio Problem Statement
8
Problem analysis/Defining the problem – KP 3 3rd
Nov 09
Problem statement: We don’t know that we’re doing the right projects & programmes
A: Roles & Responsibilities
(programme & portfolio) F:Early Project Identification
B: Common Language & G: Resources
Definitions (People & money)
C: What is the H: Portfolio
Essentials Portfolio Management
(Local vs Essentials) Tools (prioritization
& process) clarity on total
resources, clarity on prioritization, maintain
portfolio ‘flow’
D: Fit with other strategies
(Customer & Internal depts.) E: The Essentials Strategy
Desired Outcome by
Q2 2010:
The Essentials board
knows it’s doing the
right projects &
programmes
(this problem not about
doing the programmes and
projects right)
9. The First Portfolio Data Snapshot
• 700 projects…….have we identified them all? Apples and pears?
• Little visibility of benefits expected or for whom they are delivered
• 75% projects had a Project Manager identified
• <20% projects had a Sponsor identified
• No visible identification of which projects were part of strategic programmes
• >90% projects could identify the stage they were at(aligned to the AZ Project
Management Framework)
• No data on project skills levels. Little data on the costs of smaller projects.
• Data availability for capital projects generally better than for revenue ones.
• Data robustness a concern
• Belief that better data was available..….we hadn’t collected it.9
10. Early P3GN Roadmap
2010
Define Implement Govern
2011 2012Feb Dec
‘as-is’
Portfolio
Develop Essentials &
Functional level Portfolio
Decision making &
Management Process
Essentials
Board
sanction
Define minimum High level
requirements for Projects &
Programmes across Essentials
= Quarterly BCM’s
& Key decision
points
Essentials
Board
Update
High level
P3
Operationa
l Model
Define & Agree process for
Benefits data collection x-
Essentials (KPI 1)
Portfolio
‘Doingthe
rightthings’
Projects&Programmes
‘Doingthingsright’
Roll out and Embed new
Portfolio processes into
Essentials
with level of dashboard
confidence clear
Use and application of new Portfolio processes to aid Essentials board decision making
May Sept
Establish process to measure 100% of External customer
P3 satisfaction (KPI 2)
Roll out and Embed Benefits Management into
Essentials
Ongoing KPI measure and Improvement plans
Roll out and Embed P3 Customer
satisfaction into Essentials
Develop detailed processes &
tools for Programme
management
Ongoing measure and Improvement through KPI 4
Establish process to measure KPI’s 3
(P3 Skills, capability profiling ) & KPI4
(Use of P3 Framework measures)
Roll out and Embed practices for KPI’s 3
& 4 measurement
-Use of frameworks
-P3 Skills & capability
Ongoing KPI measure and Improvement plans
Ongoing KPI measure and Improvement plans
Develop Benefits tools
or templates
Roll out and Embed Programme
Management process & tools
across Essentials
Essentials
Board
sanction
Essentials
Board
Update
Essentials
Board
Update
Essentials
Board
Update
Essentials
Board
Update
Essentials
Board
Update
Phase of understanding definitions/requirements
into existing, or new processes
Phase of embedding into
existing/ new processes
10
11. Measuring P3 Improvement with Key Performance
Indicators
KPI Measure 2009
(actual)
2010
(Q1)
2010
(target)
2011
(target)
2012
(target)
2012
(BBT)
Customer
Impact
(Customers)
1 % external customers satisfied with quality, cost & timing of
Essentials 3P delivery
? ? 75% have
satisfactory
records
90%
(for 75%
projects)
95%
(for 90%
projects)
100%
(for 100%
projects)
Portfolio Value
(Financial )
2 % Project & programmes with tangible Benefits identified ? ? Obtain
existing
data & new
>$1M
projects
100% for
new >$1M
projects
75% of all
projects
100% of all
projects
P3 Processes
(Internal Process)
3 % 3P activities completed using agreed P3GN framework /best
practice
? ? Establish
baseline
60% of
projects
90% of
projects
100% of
projects
P3 Learning &
Growth (Culture
& Behaviors)
4 % Project and programme managers who have appropriate skills
profile for role within 20% of ideal capability
? ? Establish
baseline
75% 90% 100%
•KPI’s refined – Targets set with Sponsor
•General information eg $’s cost/benefits etc in Dashboard view (Control measures)
11
12. Portfolio Management – The Basic Principles
Demand
• New Demand on Essentials and it’s
Functions via Business Engagement,
or Internal/External Strategic Change
Prioritise
• Assess Value (Benefit, Cost &
Risks*), Demand vs Capacity
Manage
• Status, Risks, Strategy
Impacts/changes,
Stop/maintain/must-win quicker
decisions
Demonstrate
• Clearly demonstrate planned &
delivered benefits via
Functions and Essentials
‘Dashboard
The Basic principles of Portfolio
Management at both the Functional
and single Essentials Portfolio levels
* See value prioritisation slide
12
13. Data Collection Challenges
• Early data collection time consuming based on spreadsheets
- Need for clarity about minimum needs
- Need for clear definitions
- Risk of disengaging Project Managers with onerous & changing data
requirements
• Recognition of the need for a more efficient data management tool
- Project in its own right
• Important the basic processes were established before looking at tools
• Need for consistency at project/programme level
- key to understanding portfolio value
- common language for benefits
13
14. 14
All Essentials Programmes, Projects
and Change Activities realise their
planned benefits.
Benefits Management Vision
15. Assessing the Value of what we plan to deliver will allow for clear understanding and Prioritisation of all projects
and programmes within and across Essentials functions (Capital, Revenue, Business Change, IT, Technology)
Business
Value
of project
programme or
change
Risk
Cost
Benefit
Tangible
$’s
Resources
, capital,
revenue
($’s)
Probability
of success
(%)
Business Investment Options, Value and Benefits
F(n) and
15
16. What are the Benefits of my Project or Programme…..?
Examples to help understanding of the different types of benefit
June 16, 200916
Name, Department
Benefits are the advantageous outcomes from Projects and Programmes that will be delivered
to the business and by which success of the investment will be measured.
FINANCIAL - Cost Reduction / Saving
Reduction in future operating budget vs. a current cost resulting
in $ savings. Includes reduction in headcount or operating cost
removed from a cost centre and should be described in terms of
a measure e.g. %, FTEs and $ cost saving.
Financial benefits are measurable and directly
impact operating budgets
Qualitative benefits are difficult to
substantiate and measure.
INDIRECT FINANCIAL - Cost Avoidance
An indirect benefit that can be measured. Avoidance of capital
spend ($) that is budgeted for or future spend not budgeted .
Include savings in capital investment, avoidance of expenditure
on assets or fines. and should be described in both terms of a
measure (e.g.) $ saving.
Reputational / Ethical
May result in an enhanced corporate image, but not
directly contributable to shareprice. For example,
Media coverage, Environmental, Corporate
Governance.
Legal / Political
A benefit that ensure AZ are compliant with
legislative changes, but not directly contributable to
shareprice.
Strategic / Competitive Advantage
Bringing new advantages and opportunity to the
future AZ business/Operation, but there is
uncertainly in the measurable impact at an early
stage.
FINANCIAL – Income generation
Opportunity for potential income generation for AZ resulting in $
savings. Includes disposal of property or surplus
equipment/assets and should be described in terms of a
measure e.g. $ income to AZ.
Other Quantitative benefits
INDIRECT – Efficiency / Saving
Measurable, but not possible to calculate impact on bottom line
costs. Improved efficiency or productivity in future operating
processes vs. a current process resulting in some measurable
benefit Includes improved Productivity, Quality, Speed, KPI
measures and should be described in terms of a measure (e.g.)
time, an increase in staff motivation/feeling/Focus measures.
17. 17
• Individuals may strive for outcomes that favour their own endeavours
• Tendency for over optimism about the planned benefits & underestimate
costs and timing – optimism bias
• Risk of “benefits being overforcast in order to justify tenuous programmes
for self serving ends and in the worst cases, to satisfy over-zealous egos” –
2009 Financial Times/Moorhouse Benefits Management
Survey……....Could it happen here?
• Cultural pressures to deliver financial hurdle rates of return, even when
business circumstances change – rather than stop the project/change
• Do we have the right climate to allow the necessary constructively
challenging conversations to happen and do we have the courage to have
those conversations………?
Recognise the behaviours – external learning
18. P3MT Solution components
Project
Server
Portfolio
Analytics &
Selection
Resource
Management
Schedule
Management
Issue & Risk
Management
Team
Collaboration
Time
Reporting
Business
Intelligence &
Reporting
Program
Management
Demand
Management
Executives
Resource Managers
Team Members
Project Managers /
Planners
Line of
Business
Systems
Corporate Project Solutions
Microsoft Project Server, SharePoint, P3M Consulting
19. Unify Project and Portfolio Management
Corporate Project Solutions
Microsoft Project Server, SharePoint, P3M Consulting
20. Transitioning to Business as Usual
• Organisational change prompting move to BAU
- Recognition of Portfolio managers roles in each function
- Governance of P3
• Further focused improvement still needed
• Training delivered across the organisation - 200 people
- Practitioner Training
- Awareness Training
- Significant effort
• External consultant health check to identify any significant gaps
• Learning review
20
22. Critical Success Factors
Progress % along the journey after 15 months:
• Portfolio visibility & establishment of best practice – 60%
• Benefits realisation, processes in place to define and realise benefits – 50%
• Develop the skills and capability to enable professional P3 – 10%
• Establish KPI based performance monitoring – 45%
• Enable effective portfolio decision making – 20%
• Overall 30% complete on a long journey of continuous improvement.
22 Name, Department
23. Current Status
• Population of the portfolio tool and training to use it underway
• Sponsor training underway
• Project Management capability assessment completed
• Increased focus on prioritisation at company level has put us in a
good position to use our learning for broader benefit
• Key components of project/change Governance best practice* are
now being addressed
* Directing Change : A guide to governance of Project Management
23
24. Learning from our journey
• Successes
- Significant improvements have been made
- Active Sponsorship and leadership commitment were vital to the delivery of
improvement
- ROM enabled focused progress & improvement
- We’ve used external best practice and our lessons learned have been/are being
applied elsewhere
- We’ve adapted & evolved the approach to changing needs and when things
didn’t work well
- Empowering workstream sub teams
- Have a sense/sanity check from experts – consultant was helpful to us
- Recognition that things have moved on and we can empower others to own
future P3 change
• Challenges
- Getting basic data is difficult
- Having clear definitions prior to collecting any data
- Original remit was unrealistic – Portfolio management decision making is
impossible without the data and the right organisational maturity
- Ensuring roles very clear from the outset – it’s clear when recommendations
made as to whose role it is to make decisions
- We had a learning journey for the ROM process – early energy in - took some
time find how the process worked well for this team.
- To ensure continued support for future decision making
24
25. Confidentiality Notice
This file is private and may contain confidential and proprietary information. If you have received this file in error, please notify us and
remove it from your system and note that you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Any unauthorized use or
disclosure of the contents of this file is not permitted and may be unlawful. AstraZeneca PLC, 15 Stanhope Gate, W1K 1LN, London,
UK, Tel: +44(0)20 7304 5000, Fax: +44 (0)20 7304 5151, www.astrazeneca.com
25