1. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 1
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
TENDER EVALUATION
-JKR PROCEDURE
2. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 2
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
COURSE OUTCOME
• Enable to understand the tender
evaluation process.
• Knowledge on tender evaluation
stages and the criteria involved.
• Enable to know all information
needed during tender.
• Enable to strategize work during
tender stages.
3. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 3
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
OBJECTIVES
• To determine and to recommend to
the Board of Procurement a tender
which offers the most profit to the
GOVERNMENT. Only contractor
which has the financial and technical
capabilities is eligible for Award and
Acceptance.
4. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 4
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
EVALUATION PROCESS
6.
Issuing of
tender
Acceptance
letter
5.
Determine
budget
4.
Treasury
(if applicable)
3.
Procurement
board
2.
Processing
tender
1.
Tender opening
committee
In validity
Tender
period
Tender evaluation must be done in validity of tender period
(minimum 90 days) from tender closing date.
5. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 5
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
EVALUATION PROCESS
FIRST STAGE
Tender price adjustment
Arrange the tender price
(from low to high)
Price reasonableness based
on budget or “cut-off”
Determine the number of
tenderers to be evaluated
SECOND STAGE
Tender compliance
Tender compliance analysis
Completeness of document analysis
Adequacy of minimum capital
analsys
THIRD STAGE
Experience and capability
Tenderer experience analysis
Technical personnel analysis
qualify
qualify
Rejected Contractor
Not Fulfill requirement
Not Fulfill requirement
Not Fulfill requirement
6. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 6
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
CRITERIA
• PWD practice tender evaluation
procedure has been divided into 3
categories, namely:
i. Large projects (more than RM10.0 million)
ii. Medium projects (RM2.0 million to RM10.0
million)
iii. Small projects (less than RM2.0 million)
7. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 7
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
INFORMATION FORMS
a) Borang A – Surat pengakuan kebenaran
maklumat dan kesahihan
dokumen yang dikemukakan
pentender
a) Borang B – Maklumat am latarbelakang pentender
b) Borang C – Data-data kewangan
c) Borang CA – Laporan Bank/Institusi Kewangan
d) Borang D – Rekod pengalaman kerja
e) Borang E – Kakitangan teknikal
f) Borang F – Keempunyaan loji dan peralatan
pembinaan asas
g) Borang G – Senarai kontrak kerja semasa
h) Borang GA-1 – Laporan Jurutera Projek (JKR)
i) Borang GA-2 – Laporan Jurutera Projek (Swasta)
CRITERIA
- INFORMATION REQUIRED
8. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 8
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
OTHERS DOCUMENT
i. Audited account copy for last 2 years
ii. Account bank statement copy for last 3 months
iii. Bank report / financial institution (sealed)
iv. Copy of the certificate / confirmation of completion for
each project listed in Form D and G
v. EPF statement and a copy of Form A or copy service
agreement for contract staff
vi. Copy of the certificate of approval of technical staff
vii. Copy of Grant / hire-purchase agreement plant /
equipment
viii. Copies of the final interim payment certificate for the
current project
ix. Project report (sealed)
CRITERIA
- INFORMATION REQUIRED
9. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 9
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
Sample of summary of tender submission
10. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 10
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
EVALUATION STAGES
- FIRST STAGE
• Preparation need to be done by
evaluator before start any tender
evaluation process such as:
• Prepare summary of tender in ascending order
based on tender table prepared by Tender
Opening Committee.
. Prepare tender analysis based on cut-off pricing.
. Select list of tenderers to be evaluated.
. Check and fill up Checklist of Compulsory
Documents.
. Prepare analysis of percentage (%) of price
distribution and obtain agreement from tenderers.
. Carry out arithmetic checking.
11. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 11
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
• Number of tenderer should be assessed is
between 15-20 tenderer to produce between 3-
5 tenderer who will pass.
• "Range" of tenderer can be selected is between
+ / - 20% (+ / - 25% for Civil Engineering) from
the Mean Price.
• For the tenderers who are below the "cut-off"
will be checked the compulsory document first.
Select tenderer with special criteria to be
evaluated.
• For tenderers who are outside the “cut-off” to be
referred to tender committee for consideration.
EVALUATION STAGES
- FIRST STAGE
12. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 12
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
• A system of evaluation based on predetermined
conditions to ascertain whether tenderers are
eligible for further evaluation.
• Evaluation Criteria:
i. Analysis on Compliance to Tender
ii. Analysis on Completeness of tender
documents.
iii. Analysis on Adequacy of Capital
iv. Analysis on performance of current work.
• Objectives:
To ensure tenders under consideration are
reasonable, in compliance, complete, have
adequate capital and have good current work
performance free from sick project,
EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
13. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 13
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
i. Analysis on Compliance to Tender
EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
• Only Tenderers which comply and free from any
imperfection in term of legal and contractual which may
jeopardize their qualification based on current practice are
to be considered.
– To check if form of tender has been signed by
tenderers
– The signing person has been given the power to sign.
– To check if tender price is stated in the form of tender.
– Are PKK/CIDB registration still valid.
– Has tenderer returned all the basic tender documents,
– Check proposed construction period is stated in the
form of tender.
– Failure to submit any of the forms of tender may effect
the ranking of tenderer,
14. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 14
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
Common mistakes during filling of forms of
tender
EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
FORM OF TENDER
NOT SIGNED
FORM OF TENDER NOT SIGNED
15. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 15
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
SIGNED ON WRONG FORM
16. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 16
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
Summary of Tender Price
TENDER PRICE
17. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 17
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
SIJIL PKK
SIGNING PERSON
GIVEN POWER
VALIDITY PERIOD
AHMAD BIN ABU
18. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 18
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
CIDB CERTIFICATE
VALIDITY PERIOD
19. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 19
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
TENDER PRICE
NOT STATED
CONTRACT PERIOD
NOT STATED
FORM OF TENDER
20. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 20
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
PRICE IN
FIGURES
PRICE IN WORDS
FORM OF TENDER
21. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 21
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
ii. Analysis on Completeness of Tender
a) Tender which is complete and comply to the
requirement of tender/regulation/Authority.
b) Mandatory Tender Documents includes:
i. Forms of Tender
ii. List of Quantity/ Summary of Tender
iii. Addendum (if any)
iv. Schedule of rates
v. Design proposal, specification, pricing by
contractor etc. (where applicable) as
required
to enable design work by tenderer to be
evaluated.
EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
22. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 22
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
OTHERS - Analysis on Construction Period
• Ensure the construction period offers by tenderers is
analysed such as:
a) not exceeding the maximum construction period
stated in the tender document.
b) Construction period if offerred by tenderer is not
too short that it becomes unreasonable
23. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 23
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
Analysis on Completeness of Tender
24. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 24
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
ii. Analysis on Completeness of Tender
EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
MANDATORY DOCUMENTS
a) Audited account copy for last 2 years, or
Account bank statement copy for last 3 months, or
Bank report / financial institution (sealed)
b) Project report by project superintendence officer
Without mandatory documents
(especially regarding financial)
evaluation of tenders can not be made
and therefore tender will be rejected.
25. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 25
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
Balance Sheet statement
EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
26. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 26
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
Current Bank Statement
EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
27. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 27
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
Financial Statement Report
28. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 28
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
ii. Analysis on Completeness of Tender
29. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 29
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
iii. Analysis on Adequacy of Minimum Capital
Method of calculation
i. Rolling capital = asset liability – current liability
ii. Bank account = average of latest 3 months
iii. Make comparison between rolling capital and bank
account. Select the higher amount
iv. Include credit facilities report
v. Add (+) iii and iv = total liquidated capital (>3%)
30. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 30
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
MINIMA CAPITAL
EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
iii. Analysis on Adequacy of Minimum Capital
Sample of calculation for minimum capital 3% from
value of construction work.
Tender price = RM 1,000,000.00
PC Sum = RM 50,000.00
Provisional Sum = RM 50,000.00
Construction work value = RM 900,000.00
So, 3% = RM 27,000.00
31. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 31
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
iii. Analysis on Adequacy of Minimum Capital
Forms of Capital
a) Rolling capital
b) Shares, unit trust, fixed deposit, Bond
c) Balance of credit facilities
For joint venture tender submission, minimum
capital is analyse based on combined
equity agreed by both parties.
32. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 32
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
Adequacy of Minimum Capital
EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
33. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 33
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
• Work still on progress during the tendering
process (Form D, G and GA)
• No sick project – below 30% of work schedule
• No termination record
• Checking will carry out through;
i. PKK / CIDB / JKR scale
ii. Superintendence project report
iii. T.K.S. if no project on hand.
EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
iii. Analysis on performance of current work
34. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 34
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
Current progress report
35. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 35
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
36. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 36
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
EVALUATION STAGES
- THIRD STAGE
REASONABLE FACTORS
Faktor Civil Building Mechancal /
Enginering work Electrical
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Financial capability 45% 50% 50%
Technical
Work experience 35% 35% 35%
Technical staffs 15% 10% 15%
Machineries / plant 5% 5% 0%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 100% 100% 100%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
37. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 37
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
EVALUATION STAGES
- THIRD STAGE
FINANCIAL CAPABILITY (Financial Bid Capacity)
= Working capital
Yearly project value
i. Financial Capability
38. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 38
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
• Working experiences
• Technical staff
• Machineries / plant
EVALUATION STAGES
- THIRD STAGE
ii. Technical
• Working experience
Evaluation criteria
-. Completed total work value past 5 years
- Largest work value done in past 5 years
- Type of work is limited to recognized work
Comparable or similar (follow by head / sub-head
39. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 39
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
• Technical staff
Evaluation criteria
-. Number and working experience of technical staff
compares with Estimate Minimum Requirement
EVALUATION STAGES
- THIRD STAGE
CONSTRUCTION WORK VALUECONSTRUCTION WORK VALUE BUILDINGBUILDING CIVIL ENGINEERINGCIVIL ENGINEERING
CATCAT
AA
CATCAT
BB
CATCAT
CC
CATCAT
AA
CATCAT
BB
CATCAT
CC
More than RM5.0 m and not moreMore than RM5.0 m and not more
than RM 8.0 mthan RM 8.0 m
More than RM8.0 m and not moreMore than RM8.0 m and not more
than RM 15.0 mthan RM 15.0 m
More than RM15.0 m and not moreMore than RM15.0 m and not more
than RM 25.0 jutathan RM 25.0 juta
More than RM25.0 m and not moreMore than RM25.0 m and not more
than RM 50.0 mthan RM 50.0 m
More than RM50.0 mMore than RM50.0 m
11
22
33
55
88
33
44
77
1111
1818
33
44
77
1111
1818
22
33
55
88
1313
33
44
77
1111
1919
44
55
99
1414
2323
40. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 40
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
EVALUATION STAGES
- THIRD STAGE
Staff categories:
• Category A (Engineer, architect, quantity surveyor)
• Category B (Diploma, Technician / polytechnic)
• Category C (assistant technician))
Must be employed by employer during tendering
• Certificate and KWSP
• For contract staff – Contract agreement
• Technical staff
41. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 41
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
• Machineries / plants
EVALUATION STAGES
- THIRD STAGE
Plant and equipment that could be accounted is limited to:
• As listed in the Estimated Minimum Requirement. Plants / machineries
can be considered if function equivalently
• Owned / hire-purchase before the closing of tender
• Useful life not exceeding 150 years
• If rent-mortgage, the agreement should cover the contract period.
43. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 43
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
SPECIAL CRITERIA
• Tender submission which is below the “cut-
off” price and passes Stage 2 Tender
Evaluation can be considered if comply to
the following criteria:
- Excellent performance for current project
and completed project for the last 5 years.
- Good quality workmanship
- Tender price not less than -20% of the
“cut-off” price
- Tender price is not too unreasonable
(Freak).
44. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 44
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
Examples of low tender price can be
considered.
- Own factory for main building materials
- Currently undertake equivalent
construction work at neighboring site
- Own scaffolding / formwork for recently
completed project
- For roadwork / earthwork – own plants
and machineries readily available for use
- Satisfactorily completed 3 projects of
similar nature consecutively prior to this
tender
SPECIAL CRITERIA
45. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 45
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
OTHERS ANALYSIS
• Arithmetic checking
• Table for price comparison
- comparison of price for every building
category with the estimated price
prepared by consultant by each
tenderer taking into account the
arithmetic checking
46. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 46
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
OTHERS ANALYSIS
47. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 47
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
COMMITTEE ENDORSEMENT
FOR EVALUATION REPORT
• Ensure tenderer is not too occupied with on
going project.
• If the lowest tender price is too high as
compared to estimated mean price,
recommendation by committee should be:
– Award the tender to the lowest tenderer
– Decline all tender offer and re-tender.
• Recommendation should list down at least
five (5) tenderers in ascending order who had
passed each stage of evaluation.
• Joint signature by qualified three (3) tender
committee members
• Prepare Q14A/2005/A form for result of
tender together with complete tender
evaluation report
48. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 48
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
• Step to be undertaken if there is any fake documents
are detected.
- check all submitted documents, and
verify in compulsory document checklist.
- Check with the parties which is
responsible to supply the document. (if
suspicious arise)
- Verification of fake document should be
in writing.
- Ensure the affected tenderer not to be
recommended
- Lodge a police report and send the report to
CIDB and PKK.
- Evaluation officer to request show cause letter
from tenderer via CIDB and PKK
TENDER EVALUATION
REPORT
49. August 29, 2013 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 49
COURSE OUTCOME
OBJECTIVES
EVALUATION PROCESS
CRITERIA
EVALUATION STAGES
SPECIAL CRITERIA
OTHERS ANALYSIS
ENDORSEMENT
TENDER REPORT
Thank You