Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) in children
1.
2. GERD in ChildrenGERD in Children
Definition
Pathophysiology
Prevalence and Incidence
Symptoms and Complications
Impact on Life
Diagnosis
Management
3. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common
esophageal disorder in children of all ages.
4. Pathophysiology
Factors determining the esophageal manifestations of
reflux include
the duration of esophageal exposure (a product of the frequency
and duration of reflux episodes),
the causticity of the refluxate, and
the susceptibility of the esophagus to damage.
Note: The LES, supported by the crura of the diaphragm at the
gastroesophageal junction, together with valvelike functions of
the esophagogastric junction anatomy, form the antireflux
barrier.
5. In the context of even the normal intra-abdominal pressure
augmentations that occur during daily life, the frequency of
reflux episodes is increased :
ďą by insufficient LES tone,
ďą by abnormal frequency of LES relaxations, and
ďą by hiatal herniation that prevents the LES pressure from being
proportionately augmented by the crura during abdominal
straining.
ďą Normal intra-abdominal pressure augmentations may be further
exacerbated by straining or respiratory efforts.
Pathophysiology
6. The duration of reflux episodes is increased by lack of
swallowing (e.g., during sleep) and by defective esophageal
peristalsis.
Vicious cycles ensue because chronic esophagitis produces
esophageal peristaltic dysfunction (low-amplitude waves,
propagation disturbances), decreased LES tone, and
inflammatory esophageal shortening that induces hiatal
herniation, all worsening reflux.
Pathophysiology
7. Transient LES relaxation (TLESR) is the primary mechanism
allowing reflux to occur.
Whether GERD is caused by a higher frequency of TLESRs or
by a greater incidence of reflux during TLESRs is debated; each
is likely in different persons.
Straining during a TLESR makes reflux more likely, as do
positions that place the gastroesophageal junction below the air-
fluid interface in the stomach.
Pathophysiology
8. Other factors influencing gastric pressure-volume
dynamics, such as
increased movement,
straining,
obesity,
large-volume or hyperosmolar meals, and
increased respiratory effort (coughing, wheezing) can have the
same effect.
Pathophysiology
9. Epidemiology and Natural History
Infant reflux becomes evident in the 1st few months of life,
peaks at 4 mo, and resolves in up to 88% by 12 mo and nearlyâź
all by 24 mo.
Symptoms in older children tend to be chronic, waxing and
waning, but completely resolving in no more than half, which
resembles adult patterns.
10. As a continuously variable and common disorder, complex
inheritance involving multiple genes and environmental
factors is likely.
GERD likely has genetic predispositions: family clustering of
GERD symptoms, endoscopic esophagitis, hiatal hernia, Barrett
esophagus, and adenocarcinoma have been identified.
A pediatric autosomal dominant form with otolaryngologic and
respiratory manifestations has been located to chromosome
13q14, and the locus is termed GERD1.
Epidemiology and Natural History
11. Prevalence of GERD diagnosed in UK primary care
during 2000-2005
Rodriguez G et al. Scand J Gastroenterol 2010;45:139â46.
13. The MontrĂŠal definition of GERD
âGERD is a condition which develops when the reflux
of stomach content causes troublesome symptoms
and/or complicationsâ
Esophageal
Syndromes
Extra-esophageal
Syndromes
Symptomatic
Syndromes
ď Typical Reflux
Syndrome
ď Reflux Chest
Pain Syndrome
Syndromes with
Esophageal Injury
ď Reflux Esophagitis
ď Reflux Stricture
ď Barrettâs Esophagus
ď Adenocarcinoma
Established
Associations
ď Reflux Cough
ď Reflux Laryngitis
ď Reflux Asthma
ď Reflux Dental Eros.
Proposed
Associations
ď Pharyngitis
ď Sinusitis
ď Idiopathic
Pulmonary Fibrosis
ď Recurrent Otitis
Media
Vakil et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:1900â20
Clinical Manifestations
14. Sherman PM et al. Am J Gasroenterol 2009;104:1278â95
⢠Excessive regurgitation
⢠Feeding refusal/
anorexia
⢠Unexplained crying
⢠Choking/gagging/
coughing
⢠Sleep disturbance
⢠Abdominal pain
Symptomatic
syndromes
Older child or
adolescent with
cognitive ability
to reliably report
symptoms
Symptoms purported
to be due to GERD*
Infant or younger child
(0â8 years), or older
without cognitive ability
to reliably
report symptoms
Definite
associations
⢠Typical Reflux
Syndrome
Bronchopulmonary
⢠Asthma
⢠Pulmonary fibrosis
⢠Bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Laryngotracheal and pharyngeal
⢠Chronic cough
⢠Chronic laryngitis
⢠Hoarseness
⢠Pharyngitis
Rhinological and otological
⢠Sinusitis
⢠Serious otitis media
Infants
⢠Pathological apnea
⢠Bradycardia
⢠Apparent life-
threatening events
⢠Reflux esophagitis
⢠Reflux stricture
⢠Barrettâs esophagus
⢠Adenocarcinoma
⢠Sandiferâs
syndrome
⢠Dental erosion
Esophageal Extraesophageal
GERD is present in pediatric patients when reflux of gastric contents
is the cause of troublesome symptoms and/or complications
*For cases in which other causes have been ruled out
(e.g. food allergy, especially in infants)
Syndromes with
esophageal injury
Possible
associations
Global definition of GERD in children
15. Clinical Manifestations
Infantile reflux manifests more often with regurgitation
(especially postprandially), signs of esophagitis (irritability,
arching, choking, gagging, feeding aversion), and resulting
failure to thrive;
symptoms resolve spontaneously in the majority by 12â24 mo.
16. Older children can have regurgitation during the preschool
years; complaints of abdominal and chest pain supervene in
later childhood and adolescence.
Occasional children present with neck contortions (arching,
turning of head), designated Sandifer syndrome.
Clinical Manifestations
17. The respiratory presentations are also age dependent:
GERD in infants can manifest as obstructive apnea or as
stridor or lower airway disease in which reflux complicates
primary airway disease such as laryngomalacia or
bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
Otitis media, sinusitis, lymphoid hyperplasia, hoarseness, vocal
cord nodules, and laryngeal edema have all been associated
with GERD.
Clinical Manifestations
18. Airway manifestations in older children are more commonly
related to asthma or to otolaryngologic disease such as
laryngitis or sinusitis.
Despite the high prevalence of GERD symptoms in
asthmatic children, data showing direction of causality are
conflicting.
Clinical Manifestations
19. Prevalence of GERD symptoms in a pediatric
practice-based survey in Chicago
Suffered symptom
during previous week (%)
0
2
4
6
8
10
Heartburnâ
Regurgitation⥠Epigastric
pain§
age: 3â9 years (Parent) n=566
age: 10â17 years (Parent) n=584
age: 10-17 years (Child) n=615
â
Burning/painful feeling in
middle of chest
âĄ
Sour taste or taste
of throw-up
§
Stomach ache above the
belly button
Nelson SP et al. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000;154:150â4
1.8
2.3
7.2
3.5
1.4
3.0
5.2
8.2
5.0
21. Prevalence of reflux esophagitis in children
increases with age
Prevalence of reflux esophagitis
(%)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Age range (years)
0â2 3â5 6â12 13â17
8303 children aged 0â18 years who
underwent endoscopy (for any reason)
between 1999 and 2002
Gilger MA et al. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2004;39 Suppl 1:S383â4
9.9
6.8
25
40
22. Risk of extraesophageal conditions
Ruiguomez A et al. Scan J Gastroenterol, 2010; 45: 814â821
23. GERD affects many aspects of
childrenâs lives
Sleeping habits in 69% of children
Eating habits in 72% of children
School performance in 53% of children
Social activities in 48% of children
StrategyOne survey. Parentsâ Perspective on GERD
A survey among 205 parents of 1â17-year-old children with GERD
showed that, in the past year, the condition affected:
24. Childhood GERD impacts on the life of the
caregiver
Caring for a child with GERD may affect many aspects of the
caregiverâs life, including :
Mealtimes
Housework and household expenses
Emotional well-being
Physical health
Social life
Relationships
Employment
Kim J et al. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005;3:5
26. Diagnostic approaches in suspected GERD
History and physical examination
Diagnostic tests
â Barium contrast radiography
â Esophageal pH monitoring
â Endoscopy and biopsy
1- Vandenplas Y et al. JPGN 2009; 49:498-547*MII=Multiple Intraluminal Impedance
27. Diagnosis
For most of the typical GERD presentations, particularly in older
children, a thorough history and physical examination suffice
initially to reach the diagnosis.
This initial evaluation aims to identify the pertinent positives in
support of GERD and its complications and the negatives that
make other diagnoses unlikely.
28. milk and other food allergies,
eosinophilic esophagitis,
pyloric stenosis,
intestinal obstruction
(especially malrotation with
intermittent volvulus),
nonesophageal inflammatory
diseases,
infections,
inborn errors of metabolism,
hydronephrosis, increased
intracranial pressure,
rumination, and bulimia.
Important other diagnoses to consider in the evaluation of
an infant or a child with chronic vomiting are:
Diagnosis
29. History and physical examination
Aim to exclude worrisome
disorders and to identify
complications of GERD.
Symptoms and signs
associated with reflux are
nonspecific.
Regurgitation, vomiting
irritability and heartburn can
be caused by other
conditions.
1- Vandenplas Y et al. JPGN 2009; 49:498-547
30. History of the child with suspected GERD
Feeding and dietary history
Pattern of vomiting
Medical history
Medications
Family psychosocial history
Family medical history
Growth Chart
1- Vandenplas Y et al. JPGN 2009; 49:498-547
31. Diagnostic approaches in suspected GERD
History and physical examination
Diagnostic tests
â Barium contrast radiography
â Esophageal pH monitoring
â Endoscopy and biopsy
1- Vandenplas Y et al. JPGN 2009; 49:498-547*MII=Multiple Intraluminal Impedance
32. Diagnostic tests
Aim:
â To document the presence of pathologic reflux or its complications.
â To evaluate therapy.
â To exclude other conditions.
1- Vandenplas Y et al. JPGN 2009; 49:498-547
33. Most of the esophageal tests are of some use in particular
patients with suspected GERD.
Contrast (usually barium) radiographic study of the
esophagus and upper gastrointestinal tract is performed in
children with vomiting and dysphagia to evaluate for achalasia,
esophageal strictures and stenosis, hiatal hernia, and gastric
outlet or intestinal obstruction .
It has poor sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of GERD
due to its limited duration and the inability to differentiate
physiologic GER from GERD.
Barium contrast radiography
34. Barium contrast radiography
Advantages
â Useful for detecting anatomic
abnormalities.
Limitations
â Cannot discriminate between
physiologic and non-physiologic
GER episodes.
1- Vandenplas Y et al. JPGN 2009; 49:498-547
35. Endoscopy allows diagnosis of erosive esophagitis and
complications such as strictures or Barrett esophagus;
esophageal biopsies can diagnose histologic reflux esophagitis
in the absence of erosions while simultaneously eliminating
allergic and infectious causes.
Endoscopy is also used therapeutically to dilate reflux-
induced strictures. Radionucleotide scintigraphy using
technetium can demonstrate aspiration and delayed gastric
emptying when these are suspected.
Endoscopy and biopsy
36. Endoscopy and biopsy
Advantages
â Enables visualization and biopsy
of esophageal epithelium.
â Determines presence of
esophagitis and other
complications.
Limitations
â Need for sedation or anesthesia.
â Generally not useful for extra
esophageal GERD.
1- Vandenplas Y et al. JPGN 2009; 49:498-547
37. Normal values of distal esophageal acid exposure (pH <4) are
generally established as <5-8% of the total monitored time, but
these quantitative normals are insufficient to establish or
disprove a diagnosis of pathologic GERD.
The most important indications for esophageal pH
monitoring are for assessing efficacy of acid suppression
during treatment, evaluating apneic episodes in conjunction with
a pneumogram and perhaps impedance, and evaluating atypical
GERD presentations such as chronic cough, stridor, and
asthma.
Esophageal pH monitoring
38. Esophageal pH monitoring
Advantages
â Detects episodes of reflux.
â Determines temporal association
between acid GER and
symptoms.
â Determines effectiveness of
esophageal clearance
mechanisms.
â Assesses adequacy of H2RA or
PPI dosage in unresponsive
patients.
Limitations
â Cannot detect nonacidic reflux.
â Cannot detect GER
complications associated with
ânormalâ range of GER.
â Not useful in detecting
association between GER and
apnea unless combined with
other techniques.
1- Vandenplas Y et al. JPGN 2009; 49:498-547
39. Empirical antireflux therapy, using a time-limited trial of high-
dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI), is a cost-effective strategy for
diagnosis in adults;
although not formally evaluated in older children, it has also
been applied to this age group. Failure to respond to such
empirical treatment, or a requirement for the treatment for
prolonged periods, mandates formal diagnostic evaluation.
Diagnostic tests
41. Treatment goals in childhood GERD
Relieve symptoms
Heal esophagitis
Manage and prevent complications
Maintain remission
Rudolph CD et al. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2001;32 Suppl 2:S1â31
âOptimal treatment was defined as improvement or
resolution of the presenting symptoms and complications
of gastroesophageal reflux, with interventions that have
few or no adverse effects, and with resultant resumption
of functional health.â
42. Treatment
Lifestyle and dietary changes
Pharmacologic therapies
Surgical therapy
1- Vandenplas Y et al. JPGN 2009; 49:498-547
43. Lifestyle and dietary changes
Avoid alcohol
Lose weight, if obese
Positioning changes
Cessation of smoking
Avoid large meals
Avoid chocolate, caffeine and
spicy food
Normalize feeding volume and
frequency
Consider thickened formula
Positioning
Trial of hypoallergenic formula
Keep things loose around the
waist
1- Vandenplas Y et al. JPGN 2009; 49:498-547
âCurrent evidence generally does not support (or refute)
the use of specific dietary changes to treat reflux beyond
infancy. â
44. Management
Conservative therapy and lifestyle modification form the
foundation of GERD therapy.
Dietary measures for infants include normalization of any
abnormal feeding techniques, volumes, and frequencies.
Thickening of feeds or use of commercially prethickened
formulas increases the percentage of infants with no
regurgitation, decreases the frequency of daily regurgitation and
emesis, and increases the infant's weight gain.
45. The evidence does not clearly favor one type of thickener over
another; the addition of a Tbsp of rice cereal per oz of formula
results in a greater caloric density (30 kcal/oz), and reduced
crying time, although it might not modify the number of
nonregurgitant reflux episodes.
A short trial of a hypoallergenic diet may be used to exclude
milk or soy protein allergy before pharmacotherapy.
Older children should be counseled to avoid acidic or reflux-
inducing foods (tomatoes, chocolate, mint) and beverages
(juices, carbonated and caffeinated drinks, alcohol).
Weight reduction for obese patients and elimination of smoke
exposure are other crucial measures at all ages.
Management
46. Positioning measures are particularly important for infants,
who cannot control their positions independently.
Seated position worsens infant reflux and should be avoided in
infants with GERD.
Esophageal pH monitoring demonstrates more reflux episodes
in infants in supine and side positions compared with the prone
position, but evidence that the supine position reduces the risk
of sudden infant death syndrome has led the American
Academy of Pediatrics and the North American Society of
Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition to recommend supine
positioning during sleep.
Management
47. When the infant is awake and observed, prone position and
upright carried position can be used to minimize reflux. The
efficacy of positioning for older children is unclear, but some
evidence suggests a benefit to left side position and head
elevation during sleep.
The head should be elevated by elevating the head of the bed,
rather than using excess pillows, to avoid abdominal flexion and
compression that might worsen reflux.
Management
48. The available controlled trials have not demonstrated much
efficacy for GERD.
In 2009, the FDA announced a black box warning for
metoclopramide, linking its chronic use (>3 mo) with tardive
dyskinesia, the rarely reversible movement disorder.
Baclofen is a centrally acting Îł-aminobutyric acid (GABA)
agonist that has been shown to decrease reflux by decreasing
TLESRs in healthy adults and in a small number of
neurologically impaired children with GERD.
New agents of great interest include peripherally acting GABA
agonists devoid of central side effects, and metabotropic
glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) antagonists that are reported to
reduce TLESRs, but are as yet inadequately studied for this
indication in children.
Management
49. Pharmacologic therapy
Antacids and other agents
Prokinetic therapy
â Cisapride, domperidone, metocolpramide,
bethanecol, erythromycin and baclofen
H2RAs
â Cimetidine, ranitidine, nizatidine and
famotidine
PPIs
1- Vandenplas Y et al. JPGN 2009; 49:498-547
50. Antacids and other agents
1- Vandenplas Y et al. JPGN 2009; 49:498-547
âBuffering agents, alginate, and sucralfate are useful on
demand for occasional heartburn.â
âBecause more effective alternatives (H2RAs and PPIs) are
available, chronic therapy with buffering agents, alginates, and
sucralfate is not recommended for GERD.â
51. Pharmacotherapy is directed at ameliorating the acidity of the
gastric contents or at promoting their aboral movement.
Antacids are the most commonly used antireflux therapy and
are readily available over the counter.
They provide rapid but transient relief of symptoms by acid
neutralization.
The long-term regular use of antacids cannot be recommended
because of side effects of diarrhea (magnesium antacids) and
constipation (aluminum antacids) and rare reports of more
serious side effects of chronic use.
Management - Antacids
52. Prokinetics therapy
1- Vandenplas Y et al. JPGN 2009; 49:498-547
âPotential side effects of each currently available prokinetic
agent outweigh the potential benefits.â
âThere is insufficient support to justify the routine use of
metoclopramide, erythromycin, bethanechol, or domperidone
for GERDâ
53. Prokinetic agents include metoclopramide (dopamine-2 and 5-
HT3 antagonist), bethanechol (cholinergic agonist), and
erythromycin (motilin receptor agonist).
Most of these increase LES pressure; some improve gastric
emptying or esophageal clearance.
None affects the frequency of TLESRs.
Management - Prokinetics
54. Histamine-2 Receptors antagonists
1- Vandenplas Y et al. JPGN 2009; 49:498-547
âH2RAs exhibit tachyphylaxis or tolerance and tachyphylaxis is
a drawback to chronic use.â
âH2RAs have a rapid onset of action and are useful for on-
demand treatment.â
55. Histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs: cimetidine,
famotidine, nizatidine, and ranitidine) are widely used
antisecretory agents that act by selective inhibition of histamine
receptors on gastric parietal cells.
There is a definite benefit of H2RAs in treatment of mild-to-
moderate reflux esophagitis.
H2RAs have been recommended as first-line therapy because
of their excellent overall safety profile, but they are being
superseded by PPIs in this role, as increased experience with
pediatric use and safety, US Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) approval, and pediatric formulations and dosing are
acquired.
Management- Histamine-2 R antagonists
56. Proton Pump Inhibitors
1- Vandenplas Y et al. JPGN 2009; 49:498-547
âPPIs are superior to H2RAs in relieving symptoms and healing
esophagitis.â
57. PPIs (omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole,
and esomeprazole) provide the most potent antireflux effect by
blocking the hydrogen-potassium ATPase channels of the final
common pathway in gastric acid secretion.
PPIs are superior to H2RAs in the treatment of severe and
erosive esophagitis.
Pharmacodynamic studies have indicated that children require
higher doses of PPIs than adults on a per-weight basis.
The use of PPIs to treat infants and children deemed to have
GERD on the basis of symptoms has considerably increased in
recent years.
Controlled trials in infants with GERD diagnosed on the basis of
symptoms alone have suggested an efficacy similar to placebo
and have raised a safety concern.
Management - Proton Pump Inhibitors
58. Surgery
1- Vandenplas Y et al. JPGN 2009; 49:498-547
âAntireflux surgery may be
of benefit in selected children with chronic-relapsing
GERD.â
âIndications include failure of optimized
medical therapy, dependence on long-term medical
therapy, significant nonadherence to medical therapy,
or pulmonary aspiration of refluxate.â
59. Surgery, usually fundoplication, is effective therapy for
intractable GERD in children, particularly those with refractory
esophagitis or strictures and those at risk for significant
morbidity from chronic pulmonary disease.
It may be combined with a gastrostomy for feeding or venting.
Management - Surgery
60. Chronic Heartburn
History and physical examination
Education;
Life-style change;
PPI for 2-4 weeks
Improves
Consultation with
pediatric GI
Continue PPI
For 8-16 weeks
Discontinue PPI
Relapse
Observation
Yes
Yes No
No
Management approach to the older child or
adolescent with heartburn
1- Vandenplas Y et al. JPGN 2009; 49:498-547
61. Management approach to children with
erosive esophagitis
âIn pediatric patients with
endoscopically diagnosed reflux esophagitis or established
nonerosive reflux disease, PPIs for 3 months constitute
initial therapy.â
âNot all reflux esophagitis are
chronic or relapsing, and therefore trials of tapering
the dose and then withdrawal of PPI therapy should be
performed.â
1- Vandenplas Y et al. JPGN 2009; 49:498-547
62. Approved indications of PPIs for GERD in
children in the EU and the USA
Drug EU indication US indication
Omeprazole GERD⼠1 year GERD 1-16 years
Esomeprazole GERD⼠1 year GERD 1-17 years
Lansoprazole Not approved GERD 1-17 years
Pantoprazole Not approved Not approved
Rabeprazole Not approved Not approved
Vandenplas Y et al. JPGN 2009; 49:498-547
G.Tafuri et al. Eur J Clin pharmacol 2009;65:209-216
Losec SmPC 2008
Nexium SmPC 2008
63. Approved dosage and formulations of PPIs
for GERD in children in the EU and USA
Drug Dosage Formulations
Omeprazole
â˘10-20Kg: 10mg
â˘>20Kg: 20 mg
â˘Capsules
â˘MUPS
â˘Sachet (USA)
Esomeprazole
â˘10<20Kg: 10 mg
â˘>20Kg: 10-20 mg
â˘Sachet
â˘Capsule
Lansoprazole
â˘<30 kg: 15 mg
â˘>30 kg: 30 mg
â˘Capsule
â˘Oral suspension (USA)
â˘SoluTab
Pantoprazole No Tablet
Rabeprazole No Tablet
Vandenplas Y et al. JPGN 2009; 49:498-547
G.Tafuri et al. Eur J Clin pharmacol 2009;65:209-216
Losec SmPC 2008
Nexium SmPC 2008
Prevalence of GERD symptoms among children
Information on the prevalence of troublesome GERD in children is limited. However, in a pediatric practice-based survey, 566 parents of 3â9-year-old children reported that their children experienced heartburn, regurgitation and epigastric pain 1.8%, 2.3% and 7.2% of the time, respectively. Parents of 10â17-year old children (n=584) reported that their children experienced the same symptoms 3.5%, 1.4% and 3% of the time.1
Heartburn and acid regurgitation occurred on a weekly basis in approximately 2% of 3â9 year old children and 5â8% of 10â17 year-olds.1 The prevalence of at least weekly heartburn was therefore lower in children compared to adults (17.8%),2 whereas that of acid regurgitation was comparable (6%).2
Nelson SP et al. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000;154:150â4.
Locke G et al. Gastroenterology 1997;112:1448â56.
Symptoms among 7â16 year-olds with suspected GERD referred for pH-monitoring
Among 99 children aged 7â16 years with suspected GERD who were referred for pH monitoring, 37 had abnormal pH-study results, defined as a reflux index (the percentage of total recording time with pH&lt;4) of 5.0 or more.1 Among these children, the most commonly reported symptoms were nausea, abdominal pain and regurgitation or vomiting. Less than 30% reported epigastric pain or heartburn/ retrosternal pain.
Many of these symptoms, particularly nausea and abdominal pain, were also reported by the 62 children who had apparently normal pH-study results, with regurgitation/vomiting yielding the best symptom discrimination between the two groups.1 However, when treating children with symptoms that may indicate GERD, it should be remembered that pH-monitoring is less reliable as a diagnostic tool than in adults, as repeated measurements in the same individual give conflicting results in one-third of children.2,3
Størdal K et al. Scand J Gastroenterol 2005;40:636â40.
Nelson RG et al. Dig Dis Sci 2003;48:1495â502.
Mahajan L et al. Pediatrics 1998;101:260â3.
Prevalence of reflux esophagitis in children increases with age
If reflux symptoms persist in children and GERD is not correctly diagnosed, this chronic condition could lead to more serious complications such as reflux esophagitis, esophageal strictures and, in rare cases, Barrettâs esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma, as well as potentially life-threatening breathing problems.1-4
Among 8303 children in the largest pediatric endoscopic database available in North America, PEDS-CORI (Pediatric Endoscopy Database System â Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative) who underwent upper endoscopy for any reason, the overall rate of reflux esophagitis was 12.5â13.3%. Specifically, reflux esophagitis was found in 9.9% of children aged 0â2 years, 6.8% of those aged 3â5 years, 25% of 6â12-year-olds and 40 % of adolescents.5
1. Hassall E. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1993;16:345-64.
2. Hassall E. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1997;25:255â60.
3. Faubion WA et al. Mayo Clin Proc 1998;73:166â73.
4. El-Serag HB et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1635â9.
5. Gilger MA et al. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2004;39 Suppl 1:S383â4.
GERD affects many aspects of childrenâs lives
The impact of GERD on the children who suffer symptoms has been confirmed by a questionnaire-based study, which found that GERD has a negative effect on the quality of life of children and adolescents aged 2â18 years, as well as on that of their parents.1
The negative effect of GERD on childrenâs lives has also been shown in an online survey, which polled 205 parents of children aged 1â17 with GERD. The survey found that childhood GERD poses many challenges for families, from sleeping routines and social life to school performance and eating habits. For example:
69% of parents said that GERD affected their childâs sleeping habits
72% said their childâs eating habits had been affected by GERD
53% reported that their childâs school performance had been affected by GERD in the past year
48% said that their childâs social activities are sometimes affected by GERD.2
Tolia V et al. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2004;39 Suppl 1:P0965.
Parentsâ Perspective on GERD online survey, www.HealthyKidz.com
Childhood GERD impacts on the life of the caregiver
GERD symptoms not only affect the childâs growth and development, school life and social activities, they also cause stress and anxiety within the family, which may feed back and worry the child.
During the development of a Pediatric GERD Caregiver Impact Questionnaire, focus group discussions explored how caring for children with GERD (newborn to 12 years of age) impacts on the daily lives of their primary caregivers.1 Participants recalled feelings of fear, helplessness and guilt associated with the onset of their childrenâs GERD symptoms, which were often compounded by negative interactions with healthcare professionals (being told that the symptoms were ânormalâ or that they were âover-reactingâ). Their childrenâs GERD affected many aspects of their lives including mealtimes, housework and household expenses, emotional well being, physical health, social life, relationships with their spouse/partner and their other children and their employment.
The burden of symptoms on the child with GERD and their family is high and they need effective therapy.
1. Kim J et al. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005;3:5.