4. RDIC
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENTAND INNOVATION CENTER
O U R L A D Y O F F AT I M A U N I V E R S I T Y
8
rdic personnel, research office
achievements, university role
undergraduate research format
services, proposal and final defense
SERVICE.
STYLE.
RESPONSIBILITY.
Friday, July 26, 13
10. DIRECTOR
AST. DIRECTOR
CAMPUS COOR.
ETHICAL BOARD
CLUSTER 1 CLUSTER 2 CLUSTER 3 CLUSTER 4
COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP.
RDIC ORGANIZATION
Friday, July 26, 13
11. DIRECTOR
AST. DIRECTOR
CAMPUS COOR.
ETHICAL BOARD
CLUSTER 1 CLUSTER 2 CLUSTER 3 CLUSTER 4
COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP.
research
analytics
research
consultants
english
dept.
research
publication
RDIC ORGANIZATION
Friday, July 26, 13
12. DIRECTOR
AST. DIRECTOR
CAMPUS COOR.
ETHICAL BOARD
CLUSTER 1 CLUSTER 2 CLUSTER 3 CLUSTER 4
COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP.
FACULTY
research
analytics
research
consultants
english
dept.
research
publication
RDIC ORGANIZATION
Friday, July 26, 13
13. DIRECTOR
AST. DIRECTOR
CAMPUS COOR.
ETHICAL BOARD
CLUSTER 1 CLUSTER 2 CLUSTER 3 CLUSTER 4
COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP.
FACULTY
STUDENTS
research
analytics
research
consultants
english
dept.
research
publication
RDIC ORGANIZATION
Friday, July 26, 13
14. 6
CLUSTER 1 CLUSTER 2
CLUSTER 1 CLUSTER 2 CLUSTER 3 CLUSTER 4
CLUSTER 3 CLUSTER 4
The RDIC follows cluster-based
(per college)
research management
RESEARCH CLUSTERS
Friday, July 26, 13
15. 6
CLUSTER 1
Health & Medicine
CLUSTER 2
Education & Society
CLUSTER 1 CLUSTER 2 CLUSTER 3 CLUSTER 4
CLUSTER 3
Business & IT
CLUSTER 4
Graduate School
The RDIC follows cluster-based
(per college)
research management
RESEARCH CLUSTERS
Friday, July 26, 13
16. 7
Health & Medicine
Education & Society
CLUSTER 1
CLUSTER 2
CLUSTER 3
Business & IT
medicine.dentistry.nursing.medtech.
pharmacy. physical therapy. biology
education. psychology.criminology.
philosophy. physical educ. cas
business. accountancy. chim.
comp-sci. technology. maritime
RESEARCH CLUSTERS
Friday, July 26, 13
19. RDIC PUBLICATIONS
Book of Abstracts
Fatima University
Research Journal The OLFU Review
Friday, July 26, 13
20. RDIC PRESENTATIONS (1st SEM)
BS Pharma: 4 Papers
23rd Pharmacy Congress
Singapore, August 2013
Nursing: 3 Papers
Asian Conference on education
Japan, October 2013
RDIC: 2 Paper
Asian Conference on S.E.T
Japan, October 2013
RDIC: 1 Paper
HIMSS AsiaPac Health IT
Singapore, October 2013
Friday, July 26, 13
21. RDIC
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENTAND INNOVATION CENTER
O U R L A D Y O F F AT I M A U N I V E R S I T Y
8
INFINITY SYMBOL
(research)
PLANT ICON
(development)
GLOBE
(innovation)
LAUREL LEAF
(scholarship)
RDIC LOGO
Friday, July 26, 13
23. I THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND
Introduction
Statement of the Problem
Hypothesis of the Study
Significance of the Study
Scope and Limitation of the Study
II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
Review of Related Literature and Studies
Conceptual Framework
Research Paradigm
Definition of Terms
III METHODOLOGY
Research Design
Locale and Population of the Study
Description of the Respondents
Data Gathering, Instrumentation and
Procedures
Statistical Treatment Used
IV PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
V SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary
Findings
Conclusions
Recommendations
TRADITIONAL RESEARCH FORMAT
Friday, July 26, 13
24. PUBLICATION FORMAT
International Format
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Background
2.1Theoretical Framework/CF
2.2 Review of Literature
2.3 Simulacrum
3.0 Method
3.1 Subjects
3.2 Tools/ Measures
3.3 Analysis
4.0 Results
5.0 Discussion
6.0 Conclusion
I-M-R-A-D
FORMAT
Friday, July 26, 13
26. FONT AND SPACING GUIDELINES
TIMES NEW ROMAN SIZE 11
All ‘regular’ except titles (BOLD),
subtitle Italics, footer (CAPS)
1.5 SPACING
all areas, except appendices
and table contents (single)
LETTER SIZE
Paper, Header and Footer for
content pages only; justified
2.5 cm
2.5 cm
2.5 cm
3.0 cm
Friday, July 26, 13
27. HEADER AND FOOTER
first 5
words of
title...
page
number
OUR LADY
OF FATIMA
UNIVERSITY COLLEGE
Friday, July 26, 13
28. SPACING BETWEEN PARAGRAPHS
3 SPACES between paragraphs and titles (or 1 keyboard enter)
3 spaces
3 spaces
3 spaces
Title: Bold
SubTitle: Italics
justified;
table with
indent
Friday, July 26, 13
30. 1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework
CONTENT
PAGES
2.2. Literature Review
2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Research Locale
3.3. Population and Sampling
3.4. Research Ethics
3.5. Research Instruments
3.6. Data Collection
3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)
5.0 DISCUSSION
6.0 CONCLUSION
7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACT
SECOND TITLE PAGE
RESEARCH MANUSCRIPT - CONTENT (QUANTI)
Friday, July 26, 13
31. 1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework
CONTENT
PAGES
2.2. Literature Review
2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Research Locale
3.3. Population and Sampling
3.4. Research Ethics
3.5. Research Instruments
3.6. Data Collection
3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)
5.0 DISCUSSION
6.0 CONCLUSION
7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACT
SECOND TITLE PAGE
RESEARCH MANUSCRIPT - CONTENT (QUALI)
(omitted)
(Key
Informat
Selection)
moderatum
generalization
reflection
Friday, July 26, 13
32. REFERENCES,
APPENDICES
REFERENCES
LIST OF APPENDICES
Letters of Permission
Consent
Research Instrument(s)
Research Tally/ Interview Text
Research Plates
Research Budget
Timeline
Certifications/ Ethics
Correspondence
Authors
Acknowledgement
SELECTED LITERATURE (MIN 10)
RESEARCH MANUSCRIPT - REF/APPENDICES
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Friday, July 26, 13
33. SAMPLE TEMPLATE CAN BE ACCESSED FROM
YOUR RESEARCH COORDINATORS STARTING
AUGUST 1, 2013
Friday, July 26, 13
36. MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: TITLE PAGE
6 spaces from top of page
Title: bold
Authors + adviser
College
RDIC
OLFU
superscripts on authors
and affiliations
no header and footer for
title page
Friday, July 26, 13
37. MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: CONTENT
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework
2.2. Literature Review
2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Research Locale
3.3. Population and Sampling
3.4. Research Ethics
3.5. Research Instruments
3.6. Data Collection
3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)
5.0 DISCUSSION
6.0 CONCLUSION
7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACT
RDIC requires a structured
abstract and allow a limited
number of words, ranging from
150-250.
Abstracts must contain an (1)
introductory statement that ends
with a specific aim or
hypothesis, (2) methodology, (3)
results and the (4) conclusion.
Friday, July 26, 13
39. MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: ABSTRACT CONTENT
With the pending issues on malnutrition and healthy illiteracy, the focus has
been turned towards the potentials share of the gaming industry in attaining
the elusive health-for-all across developmental stages. This paper sought to
determine the system usability of a researcher-made computer game for
health and test the effect of player demographics to usability and usability to
the player’s intention to participate in gaming. The results showed that
majority of the respondents (n=30) agreed that the game handed to them was
usable (x̄=5.40; SD=0.88) and that they would play the game at the soonest
time possible (x̄=1.43; SD=0.68). Regression analysis showed that player
demographics is not a determinant of the player’s perception of game
usability (r=0.18; p=0.82), but usability has shown to have a significant
effect of the player’s intention to play the game (r=0.67; p=0.00). This paper
is meritorious in providing empirical evidence of the importance of usability
testing before handing down games for health to the target consumers.
Friday, July 26, 13
40. MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: ABSTRACT CONTENT
With the pending issues on malnutrition and healthy illiteracy, the focus has
been turned towards the potentials share of the gaming industry in attaining
the elusive health-for-all across developmental stages. This paper sought to
determine the system usability of a researcher-made computer game for
health and test the effect of player demographics to usability and usability to
the player’s intention to participate in gaming. The results showed that
majority of the respondents (n=30) agreed that the game handed to them was
usable (x̄=5.40; SD=0.88) and that they would play the game at the soonest
time possible (x̄=1.43; SD=0.68). Regression analysis showed that player
demographics is not a determinant of the player’s perception of game
usability (r=0.18; p=0.82), but usability has shown to have a significant
effect of the player’s intention to play the game (r=0.67; p=0.00). This paper
is meritorious in providing empirical evidence of the importance of usability
testing before handing down games for health to the target consumers.
Abstracts must contain an (1) introductory statement that ends
with a specific aim or hypothesis, (2) methodology, (3) results
and the (4) conclusion.
Friday, July 26, 13
41. MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: INTRODUCTION
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework
2.2. Literature Review
2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Research Locale
3.3. Population and Sampling
3.4. Research Ethics
3.5. Research Instruments
3.6. Data Collection
3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)
5.0 DISCUSSION
6.0 CONCLUSION
7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACT The introduction should provide
justification for the study by
identifying a niche area within the
existing body of knowledge. It
must also identify specific aims
or hypotheses that become the
focus of the described research.
Introduction should be brief and
generally limited to three or four
paragraphs, and should be used
to set the stage for the study.
Friday, July 26, 13
42. MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: INTRO CONTENT
header
footer
1.0 Introduction
(in bold)
Paragraphs
T-I-P-S
Trends, Issues,
Problem, Sentence of
Problematizing
Friday, July 26, 13
43. MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: REVLIT
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework
2.2. Literature Review
2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Research Locale
3.3. Population and Sampling
3.4. Research Ethics
3.5. Research Instruments
3.6. Data Collection
3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)
5.0 DISCUSSION
6.0 CONCLUSION
7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACT 2.1 Theoretical Framework
in S-E-C format
2.2. Should be presented
thematically with proper
citation (APA style), ends
with research question
and hypothesis
Research simulacrum is
the research paradigm
(figure)
Friday, July 26, 13
44. MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: RESEARCH METHOD
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework
2.2. Literature Review
2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Research Locale
3.3. Population and Sampling
3.4. Research Ethics
3.5. Research Instruments
3.6. Data Collection
3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)
5.0 DISCUSSION
6.0 CONCLUSION
7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACT
3.1 State the approach
and design and the
reason(s) why it is the
most appropriate
3.2. Describe the setting
for the study and why it
was chosen
Friday, July 26, 13
45. 1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework
2.2. Literature Review
2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Research Locale
3.3. Population and Sampling
3.4. Research Ethics
3.5. Research Instruments
3.6. Data Collection
3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)
5.0 DISCUSSION
6.0 CONCLUSION
7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACT
3.3 Specify sampling used
(inclusion/exclusion) and
the number of subjects
recruited; for human
samples describe briefly;
for animals refer to
standards
3.2. Describe ethical
considerations
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: RESEARCH METHOD
Friday, July 26, 13
46. 1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework
2.2. Literature Review
2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Research Locale
3.3. Population and Sampling
3.4. Research Ethics
3.5. Research Instruments
3.6. Data Collection
3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)
5.0 DISCUSSION
6.0 CONCLUSION
7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACT
3.5 Discuss content/
sections of the instrument
and credibility (eg
reliability and validity),
pilot testing, or
adaptation/adoptation
3.6. Data collection in
detail including protocol
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: RESEARCH METHOD
Friday, July 26, 13
47. 1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework
2.2. Literature Review
2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Research Locale
3.3. Population and Sampling
3.4. Research Ethics
3.5. Research Instruments
3.6. Data Collection
3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)
5.0 DISCUSSION
6.0 CONCLUSION
7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACT
3.7 Describe variables
measured and how
measurement was made;
include statistics/analysis
done, software used and
validation techniques
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: RESEARCH METHOD
Friday, July 26, 13
48. MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: RESULTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework
2.2. Literature Review
2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Research Locale
3.3. Population and Sampling
3.4. Research Ethics
3.5. Research Instruments
3.6. Data Collection
3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)
5.0 DISCUSSION
6.0 CONCLUSION
7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACT
Section Title
Present Table
Describe Table
Table
Friday, July 26, 13
50. MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: DISCUSSION
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework
2.2. Literature Review
2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Research Locale
3.3. Population and Sampling
3.4. Research Ethics
3.5. Research Instruments
3.6. Data Collection
3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)
5.0 DISCUSSION
6.0 CONCLUSION
7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACT
For every section:
(1) 1 sentence summary
of result, (2) possible
reasons for the result
(cross ref or not), and (3)
implication of the finding
with reference to
previous literature
Friday, July 26, 13
51. MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: CONCLUSION
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework
2.2. Literature Review
2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Research Locale
3.3. Population and Sampling
3.4. Research Ethics
3.5. Research Instruments
3.6. Data Collection
3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)
5.0 DISCUSSION
6.0 CONCLUSION
7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACT
1 sentence summary of
the paper objective
1-3 sentence(s) of
method used
1-3 sentence summary of
finding
implication to research,
practice and education
Friday, July 26, 13
52. MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: RECOMMENDATION
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Theoretical Framework
2.2. Literature Review
2.3. Research Simulacrum
3.0 RESEARCH METHOD
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Research Locale
3.3. Population and Sampling
3.4. Research Ethics
3.5. Research Instruments
3.6. Data Collection
3.7. Data Analysis
4.0 RESULT(S)
5.0 DISCUSSION
6.0 CONCLUSION
7.0 RECOMMENDATION
RESEARCH ABSTRACT
Discuss limitation of the
paper and
recommendation to
future researchers
Friday, July 26, 13
53. TO KNOW MORE ABOUT MINIMUM REQUIREMENT FOR
EACH MANUSCRIPT SECTION, PLEASE VISIT JOURNAL
REPORTING STANDARDS (JARS) AT:
http://www.apa.org/pubs/authors/jars.pdf
Friday, July 26, 13
54. OLFU GUIDE ON RESEARCH FORMAT
NOW ON
iTunes U
Friday, July 26, 13
55. OPEN iTunes U application from your iOS device
Friday, July 26, 13
56. at the bottom of the screen, click/touch enroll
Friday, July 26, 13
65. COMPLETE YOUR PAPER WITHIN THE SEMESTER
(NO EXTRA SEMESTER EXTENSION; NO GRADE OF INC)
Friday, July 26, 13
66. THROWBACK THURSDAY... COST OF MY PAPER
DEFENSE 1,200
BIND (4) 600
STATISTICS 6,000
ADVISER 400
PHP 8,200
(6 in a group)
PHP 1,366
Friday, July 26, 13
67. DEFENSE/
PRESENTATION
DEFENSE/
PRESENTATION
STUDENT FEES EXPENSES
PROPOSAL
(for colleges with 2 semesters of
research subject)
PHP 250/ STUDENTPHP 250/ STUDENT
ADVISER FEE (300), PANEL FEE
(600), ETHICS REVIEW (100),
ENERGY (250)
FINAL DEFENSE PHP 400/ STUDENTPHP 400/ STUDENT
ADVISER (300), PANEL (600),
ANALYSIS (500), ENERGY (200),
RESEARCH (300), BINDING (500)
6 members per group.
pay thru accounting office
Friday, July 26, 13
68. STANDARD FEES FOR PROPOSAL AND FINAL DEFENSE
DEFENSE/
PRESENTATION
DEFENSE/
PRESENTATION
STUDENT FEES EXPENSES
PROPOSAL
(for colleges with 2 semesters of
research subject)
PHP 250/ STUDENTPHP 250/ STUDENT
ADVISER FEE (300), PANEL FEE
(600), ETHICS REVIEW (100),
ENERGY (250)
FINAL DEFENSE PHP 400/ STUDENTPHP 400/ STUDENT
ADVISER (300), PANEL (600),
ANALYSIS (500), ENERGY (200),
RESEARCH (300), BINDING (500)
6 members per group.
pay thru accounting office
Friday, July 26, 13
69. NO TOKENS SHALL BE GIVEN TO ADVISERS AND PANEL
MEMBERS ON PAPER COMPLETION/DEFENSE
Friday, July 26, 13
79. MANUSCRIPT BINDING
Effects of Touch Therapy on Hospital Stress
among Primiparous Patients in the Philippines
Abstract
With the pending issues on malnutrition and healthy illiteracy, the
focus has been turned towards the potentials share of the gaming
industry in attaining the elusive health-for-all across
developmental stages. Game usability testing has yielded many
positive effects for both the gaming company and the gamer, but is
given little attention when it comes to games for health. This paper
sought to determine the system usability of a researcher-made
computer game for health and test the effect of player
demographics to usability and usability to the player’s intention to
participate in gaming. The results showed that majority of the
respondents (n=30) agreed that the game handed to them was
usable (x̄=5.40; SD=0.88) and that they would play the game at the
soonest time possible (x̄=1.43; SD=0.68). Regression analysis
showed that player demographics is not a determinant of the
player’s perception of game usability (r=0.18; p=0.82), but
usability has shown to have a significant effect of the player’s
intention to play the game (r=0.67; p=0.00). This paper is
meritorious in providing empirical evidence of the importance of
usability testing before handing down games for health to the
target consumers.
Keywords: Nutrition, Literacy, Preschool, Usability, Behavior
Intention, Regression, Game Development
Juan dela Cruz, SN; Rosario dela Cruz, SN,
Jenica Ana Rivero, RN, MAN
College of Nursing
Research Development and Innovation Center
Our Lady of Fatima University
Friday, July 26, 13
81. RX
LFU
OUR LADY OF FATIMA UNIVERSITY
RESEARCH EXPOSITION 2013
Friday, July 26, 13
82. Our Lady of Fatima University Research Exposition (OLFU-RX)
Valenzuela City, Quezon City, Antipolo City
The Research Development and Innovation Center (RDIC) of the Our Lady
of Fatima University recognizes the importance of research culture growth
among the members of the university community through conceptualization
of valuable research programs and events that will highlight and recognize
scientific research products of faculty and students. In pursuant of this the,
OLFU-RX was conceptualized that will serve as an annual research event of
the research departments across programs and campuses starting AY
2013-2014.
RX
LFU
OUR LADY OF FATIMA UNIVERSITY
RESEARCH EXPOSITION 2013
Friday, July 26, 13
83. RX
LFU
OUR LADY OF FATIMA UNIVERSITY
RESEARCH EXPOSITION 2013
Friday, July 26, 13
84. RX
LFU
OUR LADY OF FATIMA UNIVERSITY
RESEARCH EXPOSITION 2013
✓To expose the university community to a favorable and challenging avenue for
research presentation centered on friendly competition and research
camaraderie across colleges and campuses
✓To express recognition and reward exemplary research work and efforts of
faculty and students towards attaining sustainable research productivity and
excellence
✓To expound a culture of research by engaging the community in series of
worthy research activities and education sessions concurrent with the
needs of the research society and responsive to the challenges brought by the
dynamic research field
✓To exhilarate the university community on the reward and benefits of
productive research work towards creation of scholar and honor societies of
researchers
Friday, July 26, 13
85. RX
LFU
OUR LADY OF FATIMA UNIVERSITY
RESEARCH EXPOSITION 2013
Friday, July 26, 13
86. RX
LFU
OUR LADY OF FATIMA UNIVERSITY
RESEARCH EXPOSITION 2013
“Translating Research towards Innovative and Sustainable Practice”
Higher educational institutions must respond to the ever-changing needs of the
industry by serving as the primordial proponent of knowledge production and
refinement through research and scholarly work. By utilization of research products,
innovation and sustainability are ensured.
The following are the thematic strands for the research clusters of the RDIC:
✓Cluster 1 - Health and Medicine: “Sustainable Healthcare through Evidence-Based Practice”
✓Cluster 2 - Education and Society: “Exploring Best Practices in Social Sciences”
✓Cluster 3 - Business&IT: “Informatics-driven Practice: Catalyst for Transformational Change”
Friday, July 26, 13
88. CERTIFICATES WILL BE GIVEN TO ALL STUDENT
PARTICIPANTS
special label at
your binded
manuscript
Friday, July 26, 13
89. RX
LFU
OUR LADY OF FATIMA UNIVERSITY
RESEARCH EXPOSITION 2013
Friday, July 26, 13
90. RX
LFU
OUR LADY OF FATIMA UNIVERSITY
RESEARCH EXPOSITION 2013
Oral, AV, Poster Presentations
Best College Research
Best Cluster Research
Ricierca Award of Excellence
Best Faculty Research
Innovation/Product Award
Friday, July 26, 13
92. DATE TIME
ACTIVITIES PER CAMPUSACTIVITIES PER CAMPUSACTIVITIES PER CAMPUS
DATE TIME
Valenzuela Campus QC Campus Antipolo Campus
Day 1
September 24
10:00 - 12:00
Opening Ceremonies Opening Ceremonies Opening Ceremonies
1:00 - 3:00 Education Session 1
Updates: Quali Research Poster Viewing and
Ribbon Cutting Session
for Cluster 1
Poster Viewing and
Ribbon Cutting Session
for Cluster 2 and 33:00 - 5:00 Education Session 2
Multidisciplinary Research
Poster Viewing and
Ribbon Cutting Session
for Cluster 1
Poster Viewing and
Ribbon Cutting Session
for Cluster 2 and 3
Day 2
September 25
9:00 - 12:00
Oral Presentation Cluster 1
Day 2
September 25
9:00 - 12:00
Research Product and
Innovation Presentation for
Cluster 1
1:00 - 4:00
Research Product and
Innovation Presentation for
Cluster 1
Day 3
September 26
9:00 - 12:00 Oral Presentation for
Cluster 2 and 3
1:00 - 4:00
Research Product and
Innovation Presentation
for Cluster 2 and 3
Day 4
September 27
8:00 - 9:00 Poster Viewing and Ribbon
Cutting Session for Winning
Entries from Clusters 1-3
9:00 - 12:00 Audio-Video Research
Presentation
6:00 - 9:00 Researchers’ Night and Award
Ceremonies
Launching of FURJ issue 5
Launching of eJournals
Induction ceremony for Ethics
Board and Research Council
Friday, July 26, 13
93. OLFU-RX Call for Papers
For Poster Presentation. The size of the poster must be 18x24 inches
(portrait) with content font size of no less than 16. It must be printed in
cintra or sticker material posted on board.
For Oral Presentation. Accepted presentation files are MS Powerpoint,
iWork Keynote and Prezi. Pictures should not be less than 96 dpi.
For AudioVideo Presentation. AV presentations can be static (picture
and text-based) or dynamic (video-based). The entry should contain
clear audio and video, and not exceeding 10 minutes in duration.
ENTRY SUBMISSION:
July 30 to September 6, 2013
(online)
Friday, July 26, 13
