Presentation at EIFL General Assembly, Riga, Latvia, November 13, 2015

1. (except logo’s)
101 Innovations in Scholarly Communication
How can libraries support changing research workflows?
Bianca Kramer & Jeroen Bosman
EIFL General Assembly, Riga, November 13, 2015
@MsPhelps
@jeroenbosman

2. analysis
outreach
assessmentpublication
writingdiscovery

3. The research workflow – a cyclic model
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery

4. preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery
The research workflow – a cyclic model

5. 2005
2010
Analysis
Outreach

6. Survey: scholarly communication tools

7. Survey: scholarly communication tools

8. Survey results: Researcher profiles
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
others
MyScienceWork
ResearcherID
Academia.edu
Profile page at own institution
ORCID
Google Scholar Citations
ResearchGate
PhD student / Postdoc / Faculty (n=3481)

9. Survey results: Researcher profiles
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
others
MyScienceWork
ResearcherID
Academia.edu
Profile page at own institution
ORCID
Google Scholar Citations
ResearchGate
PhD student / Postdoc / Faculty (n=3481) Librarians (n=638)

10. Example research workflows:
traditional and innovative

11. Open Science
y y y y yElsevier
Example research workflows:
company silos / open science

14. How can libraries support researchers ?
Utrecht University Library
The Netherlands

15. Call to action – help distribute our survey
English
français
Español
Русский
简体中文
日本語
‫العربية‬

16. Custom URL - get data from your institution

17. • Reconsider tools practiced in information literacy classes
• Support licensing decisions
• Prepare for talks with faculty/PhD-students/postdocs
• Compare research practices in your institution with
national and global data
• Find out where your users stand on Open Access/Open Science

18. Show that as a library you think with researchers, not for them

20. Thank you !
101innovations.wordpress.com

21. Three goals for science & scholarship (G-E-O)
• declaring competing interests
• replication & reproducibility
• meaningful assessment
• effective quality checks
• credit where it is due
• no fraud, plagiarism
research
governance
changes
• connected tools & platforms
• no publ. size restrictions
• null result publishing
• speed of publication
• (web)standards, IDs
• semantic discovery
• re-useability
• versioning
technical
changes &
standards
open peer review •
open (lab)notes •
plain language •
open drafting •
open access •
CC-0/BY •
economic
& copyright
changes
researcher
funder
publisher
public
government library
good
efficient open