Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Unit 6 Evaluating Elearning Practice 30 Nov09 1


Published on

Published in: Education, Technology
  • Login to see the comments

  • Be the first to like this

Unit 6 Evaluating Elearning Practice 30 Nov09 1

  1. 1. Unit 6: Evaluating elearning practice a collaborative activity Theodora Ben Rachel Frank Cathy    Nov. 2009
  2. 2. Case studies selected <ul><li>  </li></ul>
  3. 3. Case study 9 Seeing Student Thinking and Building a Space for Collaborative Faculty Curriculum Development     <ul><li>Summary: </li></ul><ul><li>Whitney Schlegel uses case-based teaching to engage students and </li></ul><ul><li>allow for uncertainty to be a part of the science classroom. </li></ul><ul><li>- Student teams built eportfolios, documenting both the processes and content of their learning. </li></ul><ul><li>- Access was then given to all students so they could all engage in cross-group discussion and learn from each other . </li></ul>Whitney Schlegel Professor of Biology and Director of Human Biology Indiana University Bloomington
  4. 5. Case study 16 Transferring knowledge and experience in innovative educational transformation   <ul><li>Summary: Transformation of a large introductory physics course from a traditional lecture hall format to a student-centered active learning space. This model was shared online. </li></ul>John Belcher Professor of Physic Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  5. 7. Key principles
  6. 8. Key Principles Case study Evidence: Improved sharing of content and ideas between all students and teachers P10 <ul><ul><li>Improved student-student sharing of subject-related artifacts / reflections / peer reviewing / building sense of student community </li></ul></ul>P9 Appropriateness of design of learning activities P8 Active learning P7 Appropriateness of technologies used P6 Encourage 'deep learning' / Extension of learning potential P5 Student-centred P4 Simplicity / clearly communicated and guided activities P3 Collaboration / cooperation between students on activities P2 Reflection encouraged P1
  7. 9. Collaborative tools used