This document discusses using social media for academic purposes. It notes that education is becoming more networked and distributed through technology. Participatory culture online allows for sharing, collaboration and mentorship. However, some barriers to using social media academically include concerns about digital identity and who will see posts due to "context collapse" across networks. The document provides suggestions for integrating social media into academics, such as claiming a digital identity, observing conversations, engaging and experimenting openly while having fun.
2. Image: CC BY-NC 2.0 Roo Reynolds
Networked Publics
danah boyd
@zephoria
danah.org
space constructed
through
networked technologies
the imagined collective
which emerges
(people + tech + practice)
3. “I don’t think
education is about
centralized instruction
anymore; rather, it is
the process [of]
establishing oneself
as a node in a broad
network of distributed
creativity.”
@Joi Ito (2011)
Slide: CC-BY-SA catherinecronin Image: CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 yobink
4. Participatory Culture:
Henry Jenkins (2009)
low barriers to
artistic expression & civic engagement
strong support for
creating & sharing
social connection
members believe their
contributions matter
informal mentorship
15. Networked participatory scholarship is the emergent
practice of scholars’ use of participatory technologies
and online social networks to share, reflect upon,
critique, improve, validate, and further their
scholarship...
In courses organized as networks… course activity
takes place in distributed online fora. This type of online
course breaks away from the norm of 20th century
university scholarship by positioning knowledge around
social connections rather than around content, enabling
scholars to re-envision teaching instruction, their role as
teachers, and the ways that knowledge is acquired.”
Veletsianos & Kimmons (2012)
“
16.
17. So…
what inhibits you from using social media
for scholarly/academic purposes?
SOCIAL ACADEMIC
18. WHO YOU SHARE with
Context Collapse
WHO YOU SHARE as
Digital Identity
19. WHO YOU SHARE with
Context Collapse
WHO YOU SHARE as
Digital Identity
20. Slide courtesy of Bonnie Stewart @bonstewart
CC BY 4.0 bonstewart http://www.slideshare.net/bonstewart/academic-twitter-the-intersection-of-orality-literacy-in-scholarship
21. Slide courtesy of Bonnie Stewart @bonstewart
CC BY 4.0 bonstewart http://www.slideshare.net/bonstewart/academic-twitter-the-intersection-of-orality-literacy-in-scholarship
24. ...our reality is both technological and organic,
both digital and physical, all at once. We are not
crossing in and out of separate digital and
physical realities, a la The Matrix, but instead live
in one reality, one that is augmented by atoms
and bits.
Nathan Jurgenson (2011)
@nathanjurgenson
Digital Dualism versus Augmented Reality
25. It is wrong to say “IRL” to mean offline:
Facebook is real life.
Nathan Jurgenson (2012)
The IRL Fetish
42. References
boyd, danah (2010) Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics,
and implications, In Papacharissi, Z. (ed.), Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on
Social Network Sites, Routledge, New York.
Ito, Joi (2011, December 5) In an open-source society, innovating by the seat of our
pants. The New York Times.
Jenkins, Henry (2006) Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media
Education for the 21st Century. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation,
Chicago.
Jurgenson, Nathan (2011) Digital dualism versus augmented reality. Cyborgology.
Jurgenson, Nathan (2012) The IRL Fetish. The New Inquiry.
Stewart, Bonnie (2015) Open to influence: What counts as academic influence in
scholarly networked Twitter participation. Learning, Media and Technology 40(3), pp 1-
23.
Stewart, Bonnie (2016) Academic Twitter: The intersection of orality and literacy in
scholarship? Slideshare.
Veletsianos, George & Kimmons, Royce (2012) Networked participatory scholarship:
Emergent techno-cultural pressures toward open and digital scholarship in online
networks. Computers & Education, 58(2), pp. 766–774.
Editor's Notes
what is it?
relationship between DI & IRL
Privacy & Anonymity
practices
DI = the persona we present across all digital communities
It is often said that we leave our "digital footprint" behind as we share and interact online.
danah boyd defined NETWORKED PUBLICS… networked, open, online spaces (a new kind of public space)
Networks constitute the new social morphology of our societies; the diffusion of networking logic substantially modifies the operation and outcomes in processes of production, experience, power, and culture… inclusion/exclusion in networks, and the architecture of relationships between networks, enacted by information technologies, configure dominant processes and functions in our societies.
open, networked practices are changing, and will change education.
Not connected/limited by geography, space, time... but connected by our own ideas, passion, commitment via open practices & social media.
Term which counterposes “Consumer Culture”
Media can be created and shared by anyone – diversity of media, diversity of participation, diversity of voices
THIS is the wider context for all that we do, here in HE… and that is worth thinking about.
3 weeks ago today, Ireland held a Marriage Equality referendum. The referendum passed by 62% to 38% and Ireland became the first country in the world to legislate for same-sex marriage as the result of a popular vote, as opposed to judicial decisions or legislative change.
Social media was a large aspect of the campaigns, for both sides. Activity on #marref built for months & weeks & days before ref on May 22nd.
200K tweets in 7 days; almost half in final 24 hours.
Public artwork appeared around Ireland, rural & urban spaces.
Wordless, powerful images – Joe Caslin in Co. Galway
Joe Caslin on South Georges Street, in the middle of Dublin
Became iconic… printed on front page of NY Times…
… and became the subject of other artwork, also shared online, particularly via social media.
More guerilla artwork happened as well in small spaces, particularly around Dublin…. blank walls, shop windows, etc.
In the final days, a new hashtag began tranding #hometovote, Irish citizens arriving home from around the world to vote.
And on the day of the referendum… Annie West published this illustration, powerfully capturing what was happening.
Not just artwork and videos – although these were powerful and widely shared. There were many text-based pieces (FB)
As well as individual tweets…
Data analytics were used, on the day, to visualise those communications
This wasn’t a coherent narrative, framed by anyone… through messages, photos & artwork created by many, many individuals, shared on social media using hashtags, a story was being told -- collectively,
PARTICIPATORY CULTURE
Are we meeting students here?
Are we helping them to map to their current literacies, values, identities?
Networked students & Networked educators meet in HE learning spaces
Q: How can we… enable OPEN / NETWORKED / CONNECTED learning in HE?
Open Educational Practices… Open Online Spaces
share In/Out and Out/In (share our networks)
All forms of Openness entail forms of Closed-ness.
Different educational practices (both Digital and F2F) involve the interplay of OPENNESS & CLOSEDNESS.
When researching openness in education, we need to explore closures, exclusions & silences –
e.g. work by Laura Czerniewicz (ALT keynote this year)
danah boyd: we're seeing an inversion of defaults when it comes to what's public and what's private…
what is it?
relationship between DI & IRL
Privacy & Anonymity
practices
DI = the persona we present across all digital communities
It is often said that we leave our "digital footprint" behind as we share and interact online.
danah boyd: we're seeing an inversion of defaults when it comes to what's public and what's private…
danah boyd: we're seeing an inversion of defaults when it comes to what's public and what's private…
We have to embrace play!
Moodle/BB = students are themselves
Twitter / SN’s = anything they want to be value here, but we must be willing to accept & engage.
Web *IS* a place for play & experimentation... pseudonyms, avatars, different IDs in different places
We *ALL* do this to a certain extent!We must allow our students to do the same.
The term “open”, in traditional terms means being open to ideas, experience, evidence, argument, discussion, persuasion, method and reason.
NOW:
= tools, practices, knowledge
= Resources which are shared, free of copyright (or CC that allows sharing), collaborative & free to modify and/or distribute
(also visible + persistent)
OPEN = philosophy or value system – a belief that having activity out in the open yields multiple positive benefits & a commitment to continually work on becoming more accessible and inclusive (Grant Potter)