4. Programme
Welcome by the moderator (Beate Scholz)
Presentations
Round tables
Conclusion
5. Presentations
European policy and researcher mobility
Conor O’Carroll • Chair of European
Research Area (ERA) Steering Group on Human
Resources and Mobility
The role of virtual mobility
Laura Marin • Swedish Research Council
Intersectoral mobility for women
Gianna Avellis • MCFA
7. Appraisal of different mobility
concepts
Chairs and Rapporteurs
Gianna Avellis • MCFA
Antonella di Trapani • MCFA
Maria Manuela Nogueira • ESF
Round table 1 (3 tables)
8. Appraisal of different mobility
concepts – lead questions
How do research funders and universities
handle different mobility concepts in
peer review or appointment?
What are individual researchers’
experiences?
Are there any examples of promising
practice that others might learn from?
9. Appraisal of different mobility
concepts – findings
Partnership issues – dual careers. When
it is easier to move first and when it is
easier to remain?
agencies
Cultural and societal prejudices
Role models can help
Intersectorial and virtual mobility can
be an alternative for women to geographic
mobility
10. Mobility patterns by women researchers
Chairs and Rapporteurs
Maria Bostenaru Dan • MCFA
Riia Chmielowski • MCFA
Magdalini Theodoridou • MCFA
Round table 2 (3 tables)
11. Mobility patterns by women
researchers – lead questions
Which opportunities and challenges do
women researchers face as a consequence
of different mobility patterns?
What should research organisations do in
order to provide equal playing fields?
How could women researchers benefit from
intersectoral mobility?
12. Mobility patterns by women
researchers – findings
Many times geographical mobility
Difficulties in interdisciplinary and
intersectorial mobility
Necessity to prepare for different career
paths
Necessity to recognise in peer review
Good practices in Finland
13. Virtual mobility
Chairs and Rapporteurs
Laura Marin • Swedish Research Council
Conor O’Carroll • Chair of ERA
Steering Group on Human Resources and
Mobility
Cornelia Soetbeer • Volkswagen
Stiftung
Round table 3 (3 tables)
14. Virtual mobility lead questions
How could virtual mobility be supported
at best?
What are, ideally, the outcomes of
virtual mobility?
In which way could virtual mobility be
adequately appraised in peer review or
selection procedures?
15. Virtual mobility - findings
Necessity of internet
Necessity of short visits
Problems in acknowledging in evaluation
Inclusive
Co-tutelle
16. Read the detailed outcomes in the
document prepared by the ESF
http://www.esf.org/uploads/media/2014-
06-22_New-Concepts-of-Mobility_Session-
Summary.pdf
Conclusions
17. Nature correspondence on virtual mobility
Read a copy at
http://www.esf.org/uploads/media/Nature_Correspondence_v511_n7509_01.pdf
Further echo