The document discusses the history, current evidence, indications, techniques, complications and controversies surrounding decompressive craniectomy, which is a surgical procedure that involves removing a portion of the skull to relieve increased intracranial pressure from brain injuries or swelling. It provides details on performing decompressive hemicraniectomy and bifrontal craniectomy, as well as managing potential complications like subdural hygromas and hydrocephalus.
Call Girls Rishikesh Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Decompressive craniectomy
1. DR PRAVEEN K TRIPATHI
Decompressive craniectomy:
Indication, technique, present
status ,future and controversies
6 April 2016
1
2. History
ICP and methods to reduce it
Definition
Craniectomy vs craniotomy
Current evidence
Indications
Types
Procedure
Complications & their management
Cranioplasty 6 April 2016
2
3. “If there’s no CSF pressure, but brain pressure exists, then
pressure relief must be achieved by opening the skull”
-Kocher 1901
6 April 2016
3
4. History
Ancient Egypt and Greece – TBI, epilepsy, headache,
mental illness
First described by Annandale (1894)
Surgical decompression to treat elevated ICP – Kocher
(1901) and Cushing (1905) – subtemporal and
suboccipital.
Now a days , DC as treatment modality of raised ICP , and
most controversial of all
6 April 2016
4
5. The surgical removal of a portion of the skull, either
for medical or superstitious reasons is known in the
anthropological context as ‘‘trephanation.’’
6 April 2016
5
6. Erlich (1940) – For all head injuries with persistent coma
for more than 24-48 hrs
Rowbotham (1942) – All traumatic comas which
improved at first and when medical treatment was
ineffective for 12 hrs
Munro (1952) – If intra-op, the brain was contused and
swollen
Guerra (1999) – personal results of 20 years – 2nd tier
therapy in refractory ICP
6 April 2016
6
7. ICP
In a normal adult, the cranial vault can accommodate an
average volume of approximately 1500 mL.
V Intracranial space = V Brain + V Blood + V CSF
The normal ICP ranges between 10 and 15 mm Hg in an
adult.
CPP = MAP – ICP
Systemic hypertension is required to maintain cerebral
perfusion
6 April 2016
7
8. Feed forward cycle of raised ICP
Increase
ICP
Decrease
CPP
Disrupt
cellular
metabolism
Disruption
of osmotic
gradient
Influx of
water in
cell
6 April 2016
8
11. 6 April 201611
The limits of well-tolerated ICP together with
lowering of CPP:
SAH – 18-20 mm Hg
Malignant Sylvian stroke – 20-22 mm Hg
Trauma – 25 mm Hg
Slow growing tumors and HCP – 30-40 mm
Hg
12. A craniectomy of 8 cm 23 ml additional
volume (1.5% of total cerebral volume).
For real decompression, 12 cm or more (86 ml
additional volume)
Superior to the one realised by hyperventilation (2
mm Hg lowering of pCO2), ventricular tap of 20-
30 ml and without the risk of loop diuretics.
6 April 2016
12
13. Definition
Decompressive hemicraniectomy and durotomy is a
surgical technique used to relieve the increased
intracranial pressure and brain tissue shifts that occur in
the setting of large cerebral hemisphere mass, or space-
occupying lesions.
In general, the technique involves removal of bone
tissue (skull) and incision of the restrictive dura mater
covering the brain, allowing swollen brain tissue to
herniate upwards through the surgical defect rather than
downwards to compress the brainstem.
6 April 2016
13
14. Craniotomy vs craniectomy
Craniotomy – the bone flap is returned to its previous
location
Craniectomy – the bone flap is not returned
6 April 2016
14
15. Current evidence
Evidence supporting emergent
Decompressive Craniectomy in
Trauma remains controversial
In animal studies, craniectomy has
been a/w increased cerebral
edema,hemorrhagic infarcts and
cortical necrosis
Decreased ICP
Improved Oxygen tension
Improved cerebral perfusion 6 April 2016
15
16. “The role of decompressive craniectomy in
TBI and in the control of intracranial
hypertension remains a matter of
debate.”
6 April 2016
16
19. Indications
Severe TBI
Heterogeneous lesions in cerebral parenchyma
Focal (contusions/hematoma) and diffuse
Malignant MCA infarction
Aneurysmal SAH
Others
Central venous thrombosis
Encephalitis
Metabolic encephalopathies
Intracerebral hematoma
6 April 2016
19
20. Indications & Contraindications in TBI
Indications:
Coma or semicoma (GCS < 9)
Pupillary abnormalities, but respond to mannitol
Supratentorial lesion with midline shift on CT
Refractory ICP despite best conventional therapy
Age: initially < 80 years , now 70 years
(Of patients who were > 70 years, 75% were dead)
6 April 2016
20
21. Indications & Contraindications in TBI
Contraindications:
Fatal brain stem damage
GCS < 4 or fixed and dilated bilateral pupils
Central herniation are universally poor candidates for
DC
The postresuscitation GCS score, especially the motor
score, is one of the most important factors to consider in
patient selection.
Exclude possible influences on GCS scores such as
intoxication, hypoxia, hypotension, and paralytics or
sedatives. 6 April 2016
21
22. PROGNOSIS
Younger patients generally have better outcomes; however,
age alone should not be used as an exclusion criterion.
The presence of midline shift on computed tomography
(CT) of the brain is highly predictive prognostically. The
degree of shift is inversely related to outcome, and elevated
ICP is presumed.
Absent or compressed cisterns are also predictive of
elevated ICP and a poor outcome.
Early decompression (within 4 hours of injury) results in
profound decreases in mortality and improvement in
functional outcome at 6 months.
6 April 2016
22
23. When to perform?
Once ICP becomes unmanageable and signs of brainstem
compression are noted, DC may be lifesaving, but at the
expense of severe neurological impairment.
Bifrontal decompressive craniectomy is indicated within 4-8
hours of injury for patients with diffuse, post-traumatic
cerebral edema and medically refractory elevated ICP.
Subtemporal decompression, temporal lobectomy, and
hemispheric decompressive craniectomy can be considered as
treatment options for patients who present with diffuse
parenchymal injury and refractory elevated ICP who also
have clinical and radiographic evidence for impending
transtentorial brain herniation.
6 April 2016
23
24. Guidelines
Up to date there are no specific guidelines or protocols, but
there are some recommendations:
1. The North American Brain Trauma Foundation suggests
DC may be the procedure of choice in the appropriate
clinical context and also considering the use of DC in the
first tier of TBI management. (Bullock et al, 2006)
2. European Brain Injury Consortium recommend DC as an
option for refractory intracranial hypertension in all ages.
(Maas et al,1997)
3. A Cochrane review (2006) recommended DC may be
justified in some children with medically intractable ICP
after head injury but concluded there was no evidence to
support its routine use in adults. (Sahuquillo & Arikan,
2006)
6 April 2016
24
26. DECOMPRESSIVE HEMICRANIECTOMY
Supine
Rolled towel beneath ipsilateral shoulder
Head towards contralateral side
Mark midline
Incision – Reverse question mark
Posterior extent – 15 cm behind key hole
Deepened down to cranium
Myocutaneous flap reflected
Five burr holes are made in the following locations: (1)
temporal squamous bone superior to the zygomatic process
inferiorly, (2) keyhole area behind the zygomatic arch
anteriorly, (3) along the superior temporal line
posteroinferiorly, and in the (4) parietal and (5) frontal
parasagittal areas
6 April 2016
26
27. Smaller craniectomy Damage to cortical veins and
parenchyma
Dura dissected off from beneath the bone
Bur-holes connected
Bone flap removed
Temporal decompression
Wax bone edges
Dural tack-up stitches
Dural opening (controlled manner) with radial incisions in
stellate fashion
Closure with dural substitute and after keeping suction drain
6 April 2016
27
28. SKIN INCISION
a standard large
question mark or
reverse question mark
incision is used.
The skin incision
should start 1 cm in
front of the tragus at
the zygomatic arch and
extend posteriorly
above the auricle,
Upward over the
parieto-occipital area,
and forward to the
frontal region to the
hairline. 6 April 2016
28
35. Extent of bone
resection
A, Extent of bone resection
necessary for unilateral
decompression. A temporal
craniectomy to the level of the
middle fossa floor must be
performed to avoid strangulation
of the temporal lobe.
B, Extent of bone resection
necessary for bifrontal
decompression extending across
the orbital rims and down to the
base of the temporal fossa
bilaterally.
C, Three-dimensional view of
the skull after unilateral
decompression. 6 April 2016
35
36. CAUTIONS
The craniotomy itself for
unilateral DC must
encompass a large enough
area to prevent brain
herniation and strangulation,
typically from
just lateral to the superior
sagittal sinus,
Frontally to the midpupillary
line,
Inferiorly to the floor of the
temporal fossa, and posteriorly
to the parieto-occipital area
In cases of
intraparenchymal
hemorrhage, especially
mixed-density contusions
Avoid aggressive
débridement of contusions
to preserve potentially
viable tissue
6 April 2016
36
37. Bifrontal craniectomy
Bifrontal contusions / diffuse cerebral edema
Mark midline and coronal suture
Bicoronal incision (2-3 cm behind coronal)
Myocutaneous flap brought over the orbital rim (Preserve
supra-orbital nerves)
Bur-holes – b/l keys, b/l squamous temporal, straddling the
SSS just posterior to coronal suture
Bone flap
Temporal decompression
Bone wax, dural tack-up stitches
Divide the anterior portion of SSS and falx
Dural opening wide
6 April 2016
37
52. REPLACING BONE INTRAOPERATIVELY
Allow pco2 to rise intraoperatively and observe the brain for several
minutes before deciding to replace the bone flap, in addition to taking
into account the following:
The degree of preoperative midline shift relative to the volume of the
mass lesion evacuated,
The appearance of the cisterns on the preoperative CT scan,
The absolute volume of hematoma removed,
The appearance of the hemisphere at surgery (degree of swelling and
Hemorrhage, pulsatility, appearance of the vasculature),
The age of the patient,
The mechanism of injury,
The presence of other non–central nervous system (CNS) injuries
(especially pulmonary),
The time from injury to evacuation of the initial lesion, and
The extent and correctability of the coagulopathy.
6 April 2016
52
53. What is the percentage reduction in ICP attained by
DC?
Opening the dura has been shown to improve the
reduction in ICP from 30% (dura left intact) to 85% (dura
opened)
6 April 2016
53
54. Complications
The most frequent complications seen with decompressive
surgery are hygromas (26%) and hydrocephalus (14% to
29%).
Wound infection and dehiscence,
Seizures
Syndrome of the trephine, and secondary brain injury.
Expansion of hematomas after decompression
6 April 2016
54
55. CSF absorption disorders
Subdural hygromas
Hygromas frequently occur on the ipsilateral side after
decompressive surgery, probably because of altered CSF dynamics
Most resolve spontaneously without intervention.
They may be treated by observation alone, isolated or serial lumbar
puncture, temporary continuous lumbar drainage, lumboperitoneal
shunting, or ventriculoperitoneal shunting.
HYDROCEPHALUS
Causes:
Ruptured arachnoid One-way valve
Pressure gradients between hemispheres
Alteration in brain’s shape
Treatment
Ventriculostomy & oversewing if CSF leak
VP shunt (programmable)
Cranioplasty
6 April 2016
55
56. Expanding hematomas
New or existing mass lesions can
develop postoperatively, especially
given the high incidence of
coagulopathy and platelet dysfunction
Evolution of both contusions and extra-axial hematomas
can occur after the tamponading effects of cerebral
edema, and elevated ICP has been relieved by
decompressive craniectomy.
Postoperative imaging is recommended especially in
the setting of no ICP monitoring
6 April 2016
56
57. SYNDROME OF THE TREPHINED
Variety of symptoms that can develop following
craniectomy, including fatigue, headache, mood
disturbances, and even motor weakness.
Mechanisms:
CSF flow abnormalities
Direct atmospheric pressure on the brain
Disturbances in cerebral blood flow.
Often resolves with replacement of the bone flap
There is no evidence that it is harmful or that delay of
cranioplasty can result in long-term consequences
6 April 2016
57
58. Cranioplasty
Usually carried out 6 to 8 weeks after the DC, assuming that
the patient has recovered from the initial injury and
hydrocephalus or brain swelling is not present.
In the interim - “hockey helmet”
Autologous bone flap, (frozen after the initial surgery /
kept in abdominal subcutaneous tissue) is used and
provides good cosmetic results.
The bone flap remains sterile in a −70°C freezer for
many months.
Autoclaving of the bone (e.g., if contaminated by a
compound scalp wound before cranioplasty) reduce
the viability of the graft.
6 April 2016
58
59. Cranioplasty
Complication associated with abdominal preservation
of bone flap - bone resorption (5-10%) due to
hypovascular bone necrosis and sepsis of the flap.
Other materials - methyl methacrylate and titanium mesh
when the bone is heavily comminuted or contaminated.
For large, cosmetically important defects, the use of
casts, stereolithographic models, and CT-based
“computer-assisted design” reconstruction technology
6 April 2016
59
60. Critical size of defect
Bone defects > 2 cm on the cerebral convexity
and bone defects of glabrous frontal region
No need for repair in
Defects below the temporal & occipital muscles
Very elderly
Children < 6 yrs in whom dura is not damaged
Parietal area defect < 5 cm2
6 April 2016
60
61. AUTO BONE GRAFT
Wrap in blood soaked sponge for 4-6 hrs
More than 6 hrs → 10 % serum / 90 % salt
solution at 3°C.
Don’t expose to air for more than 30 min.
Normal saline is toxic
Avoid antibiotic soak
Split bone graft – Outer & inner tables split
6 April 2016
61
63. Conclusion
IC-HTN results from many disease processes.
Decompressive craniectomy can be life preserving
procedure.
Selection criteria remains in involution.
Best outcomes are achieved in young patients treated
early in course of disease.
The decision to proceed with decompressive
craniectomy should take into consideration several
factors including family wishes and reasonable
expectations of level of recovery. 6 April 2016
63