Sistekchandlerdefenserfinal

A Mixed Methods Study on CBAM and the Adoption of Thin Client Computers by Adolescents ,[object Object],[object Object]

Statement of Purpose ,[object Object]

Research Questions ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Background: Theory and the Instrumentation CBAM and CFSoCQ ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Modifications ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Demographics of Students Other 33% 11% .02% 44% 11% Percent 15 5 1 20 5 Population 23.7% 211 White (non-Hispanic) 3.4% 30 Filipino 3.3% 29 Asian 1.6% 14 Pacific Islander 0.7% 6 Native American 38.1% 339 Hispanic or Latino 29.0% 260 African American Percent School Racial and Ethnic

Review of Literature ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Design and Methodology ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Quantitative Analysis Q. 1 During the first year of the adoption, what stages of concern were evident at the beginning and at the end of the year? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Distribution of the Population

Findings for Research Q. 1 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Research Q. 2 To what extent can variation in these stages of concern be explained by select demographic measures (gender, race/ethnicity, GPA, free and reduced lunch)? ,[object Object],[object Object]

Two Significant Findings ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Q. 3 Based on the qualitative interviews, how do select students describe their adoption of this innovation? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

3 Distinct Pathways ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Pathway 1 Example Female, Wendy Typical Progression

Proportional Representation to Case Study Total Population: 32 females, 13 males Case Study: 6 females, 8 males 1-M 2-F 7-M 6-F Gender 2-F 1-M 3-M 17-F Gender 2-F 3-M 9-F Gender 2 (25%) 3 (37.5%) 3 (37.5%) Case Study n = 8 12 (7%) 20 (44%) 13 (9%) Population N = 45 P3 P2 P 1

Findings, cont. ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Perceptions about Grades ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

GPA’s 2.70 2.54 Michael 2.98 2.59 Justin 3.14 3.00 Teresa 3.37 3.01 Mariah 3.11 2.55 Ariel 3.77 3.23 Michelle 3.87 3.23 Wendy 3.98 3.60 Shelly GPA 7th GPA 6th Student

Four themes from literature ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Themes from the Literature ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Limitations of the Study ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Policy Implications ,[object Object]

Implications for Future Research ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Future Research ,[object Object]

Questions? Thank you for your time!

Sistekchandlerdefenserfinal

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (18)

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to Sistekchandlerdefenserfinal

Similar to Sistekchandlerdefenserfinal (20)

More from National University

More from National University (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Sistekchandlerdefenserfinal