SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 35
Disclaimer:

There’s actually nothing
 offensive or politically
  incorrect about this
     presentation.

      How boring.           2
Overview
1. The standard story
2. Question the received wisdom
3. Reach the same conclusions


Why bother with this exercise?

0 Conclusion: Language shift is complicated. Overly
 simplistic representations don’t give us the insights
 we need to address the issue.

                                                         3
The Received Story
0 Originally 10,000                0 Responses:
  languages4
                                      0 Document them before
0 6,909 living languages                they die out
  left10
                                      0 Revitalization and
0 50% - 90% of those will go
  extinct by 210014, 7                  reclamation programs
0 (Some) causes:                      0 Government support for
  0   Globalization                     endangered languages
  0   Technology
  0   Overt political repression
  0   Cultural dominance

                                                                 4
100,000,0    10,000,00
               2,014   1,038                                   00 to 999,   0 to 99,99
                0%      0%                                      999,999       9,999
      1,824                    339                                0%            1%
       1%                                             1 to 9                             1,000,000
                               0%                      2%                                 to 9,999,
895                                  133   10 to 99                                         999
5%                                           5%                                              5%
                                     0%

                                                                             100,000 t
        304                                            100 to 99             o 999,999
        16%                                               9                     13%
                          8                              16%
                         39%


               77                                                                10,000 to
                                                       1,000 to 9                 99,999
              39%                                         ,999                     28%
                                                          30%




      Languages as % of World                            Languages by Speaker
           Population10                                      Population10                  5
Endangered     Languages3
  3,167 currently endangered




                               6
Language       Vitality 9


         4%
              9%
                          Extinct since 1950
                   10%    Severely endangered
                          Critically endangered
                          Vulnerable
57%                10%    Definitely endangered
                          Safe or data-deficient

               11%




                                                   7
Language                  Vitality 9


                 4%
                        9%
                                    Extinct since 1950
                             10%    Severely endangered
                                    Critically endangered
    ???                             Vulnerable
Data-deficient               10%    Definitely endangered
                                    Safe
                                    Data-deficient
                         11%
                 ???
                 Safe


                                                            8
Why worry about language
        death?
0 Value to linguistic science
0 Irreplacable cultural heritage
0 Loss of indigenous knowledge about the world
0 Loss of indigenous perspectives on the world
0 Loss of cultural identity
0 Concommitant decline in biodiversity
0 Language as a human right
0 Benefits of mother tongue education and bilingualism
0 Language death is happening faster now than before

                                                         9
A Closer Look at Language
          Death
“There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.”
                        ~ Mark Twain




                                                                      10
The Original Languages
                      ante 8,000 BC

0 Neolithic population estimate: 10 million9
0 Hunter-gathering can only support small communities
   0 Constant fracturing of groups into new branches
   0 Each group speaks a slightly different language variety
0 Received wisdom:
   0 < ~500 – 1,000 speakers per language7
   0 ~ 5,000 – 20,000 languages as of 10,000 y.a.




                                                               11
NSW Department of Education and Communities:                                12
http://www.curriculumsupport.education.nsw.gov.au/shared/abmaps/nations.htm
0 Question: Languages or dialect continuum?


0 Question: Can we meaningfully compare language
 statistics from today to the Paleolithic?




                                                   13
The Agrarian Revolution
                   8,000 – 5,000 BC

0 Sedentary lifestyle supports larger communities
0 Languages grow and crowd each other out / absorb
  other speaker communities
0 Received wisdom:
  0 Languages have been continuously on the decline
0 Decrease in # of languages offset by population
  explosion7
0 Earliest instance of urbanization
0 Renfew-Bellwood Effect – decrease in deep-level
  diversity, i.e. the number of language families7

                                                      14
0 Question: Is language death a modern phenomenon?


0 Question: Are the causes of language death today
 compared to in early history different in kind or
 simply degree? Is language death today a
 fundamentally different phenomenon?




                                                     15
Counting Languages
0 What’s a language?
  0 Mutual intelligibility
                                             L1
                                             L2
                             Dialect chain
                                             L3
                                             L4
                                             L5
                                                  16
Counting Languages
0 What’s a language?
  0 Mutual intelligibility
                             L1
                             L2
                             L3
                             L4
                             L5
                                  17
Counting Languages
0 What’s a language?
  0 Mutual intelligibility
                                                 L1
  0 Politics
     0 Chinese
                                                 L2
     0 Serbo-Croation           L3 = L1 or L2?

  0 Language attitudes
                                                 L3
     0 Scandanavian languages
                                                 L4
                                                 L5
                                                      18
Counting Languages
0 What’s a speaker?          0 Are the numbers
  0 Cultural knowledge =      accurate?5
    linguistic knowledge       0 Self-reporting
    0 Do younger speakers
      count?                   0 Out-of-date data
    0 Knowledge of             0 Under-reporting
      quotes, proverbs           0 Australian Native Title1
  0 Do outsiders count?        0 Over-reporting
    0 Linguists?
                                 0 A few phrases = speaker
    0 Non-ethnic community
      members?


                                                              19
Ecological Metaphors
0 Originally 10,000              0 Responses:
  languages                         0 Document them before
0 6,909 living languages left         they die out
0 50% - 90% of those will go        0 Revitalization and
  extinct by 2100                     reclamation programs
0 (Some) causes:                    0 Government support for
  0 Globalization                     endangered languages
  0 Technology
  0 Overt political repression
  0 Cultural dominance

                                                               20
Ecological Metaphors
0 Language death / extinction
0 Competition
0 Language ecologies
0 Preservation / revitalization

0 Question: Are languages like organisms? How so?
 Why not?

0 Question: Which of these metaphors are useful? In
 what ways?
                                                      21
Language & Ecology
0 Clear correlation between linguistic and biological
  diversity16
0 Language ecology – relationship between languages
  and the people who speak them5, 6
  0 Strong version – theory of language competition13
0 Ecolinguistics – branch of language ecology5
   0 Discounts notion of competition
   0 Focus on connection between language and their
     ‘habitat’ or social, political, and economic contexts


                                                             22
23
0 Question: Are the causes of language death and biological
 extinction the same?

0 Question: Are the metaphors of language competition and
 ecologies useful? Or do they obscure the issues?

0 Question: Do languages compete/die/have habitats, or do
 speakers do, or both?

0 Question: What terminology could we use that might more
 accurately represent these phenomena?

0 Question: Do you think any of the terminology we’ve
 discussed is offensive or denigrating?


                                                              24
0 Question: Languages naturally change and differentiate
 from each other over time. Is the rate of linguistic
 diversification equal to the rate of language shift / death?

0 Question: Should we distinguish different types of
 diversity? What types?

0 Question: Will dying languages be replaced by new ones?
 Will the rate of replacement equal the rate of extinction?




                                                                25
Language Birth
                                   0 Chinglish (China)
0 Pidgins and creoles
                                   0 Singlish (Singapore)
0 Revitalized languages            0 Sheng (Nairobi)
                                   0        ol (Brazil)
0 Linguistic diversification
   0 Latin >                       0   Nubi (Arabic: Kenya)
     Spanish, Catalan, Corsic      0   Afrikaans (S. Africa)
     an, French, Italian, Galici   0   Gullah (S.E. U.S. coast)
     an, Mozarabic, Occitan,       0   Krio (Sierra Leone)
                                   0   Kreyol (Liberia)
     Portugese, Romansh
                                   0   Hatian Creole (Haiti)
0 Regular processes of             0   Patwa (Dominica)
  historical change                0   Ladino (Judeo-Spanish)

                                                                  26
Hunting for the Roots of the
      Language Shift
0 Question: How true are the following statements?
   0 ‘Indigenous languages are dying because they can’t
     express concepts needed for the modern world.’
   0 ‘Indigenous languages are dying because they’re some
     of the most complex and hardest to learn.’

0 Question: What is globalization?
   0 Is globalization a cause or a result of language shift, or
     both?
   0 How can globalization actually support linguistic
     diversity?

                                                                  27
Overt and Covert Causes
0 Natural catastrophes   0 Linguistic nationalism
0 War and genocide       0 Economic conditions
0 Language policy        0 Political autonomy
0 Compulsory education   0 Language attitudes and
                           associations
                         0 Revitalization efforts?
                         0 Technology?




                                                     28
0 Question: How is language shift in autochthonous
 communities similar or different to language shift in
 immigrant communities?

0 Question: Which is more important for understanding
 language shift – the language a person speaks, or the
 language they teach their children?




                                                         29
How should we respond?
0 “Let them die in           0 “it is most urgent to
  peace.”11                    document languages
                               before they disappear”7
0 “It is paternalistic of
                             0 “our global village must
  linguists to assume that
                               be truly multicultural
  they know what is best       and multilingual, or it
  for the community.”8         will not exist at all.”14
0 “Patwa is keeping back     0 “Language death is a
  the children.”15             terrible loss, to all who
                               come into contact with
                               it”5

                                                           30
Subjectivity and Language
0 Question: Is the value of language objective or
 subjective? (Note: subjective ≠ arbitrary)

0 Question: Are languages mutually exclusive? Are they
 even in direct competition?




                                                         31
Conclusion
0 Language endangerment is complicated.
   0 (Sorry if you were hoping for a straightforward
     conclusion.)

0 Overly simplistic representations don’t give us the
 insights we need to actually address the issue.

0 A great deal more research needs to be done in
 understanding the precise causes of language shift, so
 that communities can best address this phenomenon
 in the way that is most appropriate for them.
                                                          32
Contact Information
                Daniel W. Hieber
                  Rosetta Stone
            dhieber@rosettastone.com

Slides and other presentations available on website:
              www.danielhieber.com




                                                       33
Further Reading
0 EndangeredLanguages.com


0 Dying Words by Nicholas Evans


0 When Languages Die by K. David Harrison


0 ‘Why do languages die?’ by Daniel W. Hieber



                                                34
Sources
1.    Boynton, Jessica. 2011. The cost of language mobilisation. SSILA Summer Meeting, Boulder, CO.
2.    Crystal, David. 2000. Language Death. Cambridge University Press.
3.    Endangered Languages. 2012. The Linguist List at Eastern Michigan University and The University of
      Hawaii at Manoa. http://www.endangeredlanguages.com
4.    Evans, Nicholas. 2010. Dying Words: Endangered Languages and What They Have to Tell Us. Wiley-
      Blackwell.
5.    Grenoble, Lenore A. 2011. Language ecology and endangerment. In Peter K. Austin & Julia Sallabank
      (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages. 27-45. Cambridge University Press.
6.    Haugen, Einar. 1972. The Ecology of Language: Essays by Einar Haugen. Stanford University Press.
7.    Krauss, Michael E. 1992. The world’s languages in crisis. Language 68(1): 4-10.
8.    Ladefoged, Peter. 1992. Another view of endangered languages. Language 68(4): 809-811.
9.    Lee, R. B. & I. DeVore (eds.). 1968. Man the Hunter. Aldine.
10.   Lewis, M. Paul (ed.), 2009. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 16th edn. SIL International. Online
      version: http://www.ethnologue.com
11.   Malik, Kenan. 2000. Let them die. Prospect, November. Online version:
      http://www.kenanmalik.com/essays/die.html
12.   Moseley, Christopher (ed.). 2010. Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger, 3rd edn. UNESCO. Online
      version: http://www.unesco.org/culture/languages-atlas/en/atlasmap.html
13.   Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution (Cambridge Approaches to Language
      Contact). Cambridge University Press.
14.   Nettle, Daniel & Suzanne Romaine. 2000. Vanishing Voices: The Extinction of the World’s Languages.
      Oxford University Press.
15.   Paugh, Amy L. 2012. Playing with Languages: Children and Change in a Caribbean Village. Berghahn
      Books.
16.   Sutherland, William J. 2003. Parallel extinction risk and global distribution of languages and species.
      Nature 423: 276-9.
                                                                                                          35

More Related Content

More from Daniel Hieber

Hieber, Manavi & Manavi - Rosetta Stone and Navajo Language Renaissance: coll...
Hieber, Manavi & Manavi - Rosetta Stone and Navajo Language Renaissance: coll...Hieber, Manavi & Manavi - Rosetta Stone and Navajo Language Renaissance: coll...
Hieber, Manavi & Manavi - Rosetta Stone and Navajo Language Renaissance: coll...Daniel Hieber
 
Hieber - An Introduction to Typology, Part III: Grammatical Relations
Hieber - An Introduction to Typology, Part III: Grammatical RelationsHieber - An Introduction to Typology, Part III: Grammatical Relations
Hieber - An Introduction to Typology, Part III: Grammatical RelationsDaniel Hieber
 
Hieber - An Introduction to Typology, Part II: Voice & Transitivity
Hieber - An Introduction to Typology, Part II: Voice & TransitivityHieber - An Introduction to Typology, Part II: Voice & Transitivity
Hieber - An Introduction to Typology, Part II: Voice & TransitivityDaniel Hieber
 
Hieber - An Introduction to Typology, Part I: Morphological Typology
Hieber - An Introduction to Typology, Part I: Morphological TypologyHieber - An Introduction to Typology, Part I: Morphological Typology
Hieber - An Introduction to Typology, Part I: Morphological TypologyDaniel Hieber
 
Hieber - Language Endangerment & Nationalism
Hieber - Language Endangerment & NationalismHieber - Language Endangerment & Nationalism
Hieber - Language Endangerment & NationalismDaniel Hieber
 
Hieber - Language Endangerment: A History
Hieber - Language Endangerment: A HistoryHieber - Language Endangerment: A History
Hieber - Language Endangerment: A HistoryDaniel Hieber
 
Manavi, Bittinger, & Hieber - A Case Study in Digital Collaboration
Manavi, Bittinger, & Hieber - A Case Study in Digital CollaborationManavi, Bittinger, & Hieber - A Case Study in Digital Collaboration
Manavi, Bittinger, & Hieber - A Case Study in Digital CollaborationDaniel Hieber
 
Bittinger & Hieber - Language revitalization: Issues with reference to Navajo
Bittinger & Hieber - Language revitalization: Issues with reference to NavajoBittinger & Hieber - Language revitalization: Issues with reference to Navajo
Bittinger & Hieber - Language revitalization: Issues with reference to NavajoDaniel Hieber
 

More from Daniel Hieber (8)

Hieber, Manavi & Manavi - Rosetta Stone and Navajo Language Renaissance: coll...
Hieber, Manavi & Manavi - Rosetta Stone and Navajo Language Renaissance: coll...Hieber, Manavi & Manavi - Rosetta Stone and Navajo Language Renaissance: coll...
Hieber, Manavi & Manavi - Rosetta Stone and Navajo Language Renaissance: coll...
 
Hieber - An Introduction to Typology, Part III: Grammatical Relations
Hieber - An Introduction to Typology, Part III: Grammatical RelationsHieber - An Introduction to Typology, Part III: Grammatical Relations
Hieber - An Introduction to Typology, Part III: Grammatical Relations
 
Hieber - An Introduction to Typology, Part II: Voice & Transitivity
Hieber - An Introduction to Typology, Part II: Voice & TransitivityHieber - An Introduction to Typology, Part II: Voice & Transitivity
Hieber - An Introduction to Typology, Part II: Voice & Transitivity
 
Hieber - An Introduction to Typology, Part I: Morphological Typology
Hieber - An Introduction to Typology, Part I: Morphological TypologyHieber - An Introduction to Typology, Part I: Morphological Typology
Hieber - An Introduction to Typology, Part I: Morphological Typology
 
Hieber - Language Endangerment & Nationalism
Hieber - Language Endangerment & NationalismHieber - Language Endangerment & Nationalism
Hieber - Language Endangerment & Nationalism
 
Hieber - Language Endangerment: A History
Hieber - Language Endangerment: A HistoryHieber - Language Endangerment: A History
Hieber - Language Endangerment: A History
 
Manavi, Bittinger, & Hieber - A Case Study in Digital Collaboration
Manavi, Bittinger, & Hieber - A Case Study in Digital CollaborationManavi, Bittinger, & Hieber - A Case Study in Digital Collaboration
Manavi, Bittinger, & Hieber - A Case Study in Digital Collaboration
 
Bittinger & Hieber - Language revitalization: Issues with reference to Navajo
Bittinger & Hieber - Language revitalization: Issues with reference to NavajoBittinger & Hieber - Language revitalization: Issues with reference to Navajo
Bittinger & Hieber - Language revitalization: Issues with reference to Navajo
 

The Politically Incorrect Guide to Language Death

  • 1.
  • 2. Disclaimer: There’s actually nothing offensive or politically incorrect about this presentation. How boring. 2
  • 3. Overview 1. The standard story 2. Question the received wisdom 3. Reach the same conclusions Why bother with this exercise? 0 Conclusion: Language shift is complicated. Overly simplistic representations don’t give us the insights we need to address the issue. 3
  • 4. The Received Story 0 Originally 10,000 0 Responses: languages4 0 Document them before 0 6,909 living languages they die out left10 0 Revitalization and 0 50% - 90% of those will go extinct by 210014, 7 reclamation programs 0 (Some) causes: 0 Government support for 0 Globalization endangered languages 0 Technology 0 Overt political repression 0 Cultural dominance 4
  • 5. 100,000,0 10,000,00 2,014 1,038 00 to 999, 0 to 99,99 0% 0% 999,999 9,999 1,824 339 0% 1% 1% 1 to 9 1,000,000 0% 2% to 9,999, 895 133 10 to 99 999 5% 5% 5% 0% 100,000 t 304 100 to 99 o 999,999 16% 9 13% 8 16% 39% 77 10,000 to 1,000 to 9 99,999 39% ,999 28% 30% Languages as % of World Languages by Speaker Population10 Population10 5
  • 6. Endangered Languages3 3,167 currently endangered 6
  • 7. Language Vitality 9 4% 9% Extinct since 1950 10% Severely endangered Critically endangered Vulnerable 57% 10% Definitely endangered Safe or data-deficient 11% 7
  • 8. Language Vitality 9 4% 9% Extinct since 1950 10% Severely endangered Critically endangered ??? Vulnerable Data-deficient 10% Definitely endangered Safe Data-deficient 11% ??? Safe 8
  • 9. Why worry about language death? 0 Value to linguistic science 0 Irreplacable cultural heritage 0 Loss of indigenous knowledge about the world 0 Loss of indigenous perspectives on the world 0 Loss of cultural identity 0 Concommitant decline in biodiversity 0 Language as a human right 0 Benefits of mother tongue education and bilingualism 0 Language death is happening faster now than before 9
  • 10. A Closer Look at Language Death “There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.” ~ Mark Twain 10
  • 11. The Original Languages ante 8,000 BC 0 Neolithic population estimate: 10 million9 0 Hunter-gathering can only support small communities 0 Constant fracturing of groups into new branches 0 Each group speaks a slightly different language variety 0 Received wisdom: 0 < ~500 – 1,000 speakers per language7 0 ~ 5,000 – 20,000 languages as of 10,000 y.a. 11
  • 12. NSW Department of Education and Communities: 12 http://www.curriculumsupport.education.nsw.gov.au/shared/abmaps/nations.htm
  • 13. 0 Question: Languages or dialect continuum? 0 Question: Can we meaningfully compare language statistics from today to the Paleolithic? 13
  • 14. The Agrarian Revolution 8,000 – 5,000 BC 0 Sedentary lifestyle supports larger communities 0 Languages grow and crowd each other out / absorb other speaker communities 0 Received wisdom: 0 Languages have been continuously on the decline 0 Decrease in # of languages offset by population explosion7 0 Earliest instance of urbanization 0 Renfew-Bellwood Effect – decrease in deep-level diversity, i.e. the number of language families7 14
  • 15. 0 Question: Is language death a modern phenomenon? 0 Question: Are the causes of language death today compared to in early history different in kind or simply degree? Is language death today a fundamentally different phenomenon? 15
  • 16. Counting Languages 0 What’s a language? 0 Mutual intelligibility L1 L2 Dialect chain L3 L4 L5 16
  • 17. Counting Languages 0 What’s a language? 0 Mutual intelligibility L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 17
  • 18. Counting Languages 0 What’s a language? 0 Mutual intelligibility L1 0 Politics 0 Chinese L2 0 Serbo-Croation L3 = L1 or L2? 0 Language attitudes L3 0 Scandanavian languages L4 L5 18
  • 19. Counting Languages 0 What’s a speaker? 0 Are the numbers 0 Cultural knowledge = accurate?5 linguistic knowledge 0 Self-reporting 0 Do younger speakers count? 0 Out-of-date data 0 Knowledge of 0 Under-reporting quotes, proverbs 0 Australian Native Title1 0 Do outsiders count? 0 Over-reporting 0 Linguists? 0 A few phrases = speaker 0 Non-ethnic community members? 19
  • 20. Ecological Metaphors 0 Originally 10,000 0 Responses: languages 0 Document them before 0 6,909 living languages left they die out 0 50% - 90% of those will go 0 Revitalization and extinct by 2100 reclamation programs 0 (Some) causes: 0 Government support for 0 Globalization endangered languages 0 Technology 0 Overt political repression 0 Cultural dominance 20
  • 21. Ecological Metaphors 0 Language death / extinction 0 Competition 0 Language ecologies 0 Preservation / revitalization 0 Question: Are languages like organisms? How so? Why not? 0 Question: Which of these metaphors are useful? In what ways? 21
  • 22. Language & Ecology 0 Clear correlation between linguistic and biological diversity16 0 Language ecology – relationship between languages and the people who speak them5, 6 0 Strong version – theory of language competition13 0 Ecolinguistics – branch of language ecology5 0 Discounts notion of competition 0 Focus on connection between language and their ‘habitat’ or social, political, and economic contexts 22
  • 23. 23
  • 24. 0 Question: Are the causes of language death and biological extinction the same? 0 Question: Are the metaphors of language competition and ecologies useful? Or do they obscure the issues? 0 Question: Do languages compete/die/have habitats, or do speakers do, or both? 0 Question: What terminology could we use that might more accurately represent these phenomena? 0 Question: Do you think any of the terminology we’ve discussed is offensive or denigrating? 24
  • 25. 0 Question: Languages naturally change and differentiate from each other over time. Is the rate of linguistic diversification equal to the rate of language shift / death? 0 Question: Should we distinguish different types of diversity? What types? 0 Question: Will dying languages be replaced by new ones? Will the rate of replacement equal the rate of extinction? 25
  • 26. Language Birth 0 Chinglish (China) 0 Pidgins and creoles 0 Singlish (Singapore) 0 Revitalized languages 0 Sheng (Nairobi) 0 ol (Brazil) 0 Linguistic diversification 0 Latin > 0 Nubi (Arabic: Kenya) Spanish, Catalan, Corsic 0 Afrikaans (S. Africa) an, French, Italian, Galici 0 Gullah (S.E. U.S. coast) an, Mozarabic, Occitan, 0 Krio (Sierra Leone) 0 Kreyol (Liberia) Portugese, Romansh 0 Hatian Creole (Haiti) 0 Regular processes of 0 Patwa (Dominica) historical change 0 Ladino (Judeo-Spanish) 26
  • 27. Hunting for the Roots of the Language Shift 0 Question: How true are the following statements? 0 ‘Indigenous languages are dying because they can’t express concepts needed for the modern world.’ 0 ‘Indigenous languages are dying because they’re some of the most complex and hardest to learn.’ 0 Question: What is globalization? 0 Is globalization a cause or a result of language shift, or both? 0 How can globalization actually support linguistic diversity? 27
  • 28. Overt and Covert Causes 0 Natural catastrophes 0 Linguistic nationalism 0 War and genocide 0 Economic conditions 0 Language policy 0 Political autonomy 0 Compulsory education 0 Language attitudes and associations 0 Revitalization efforts? 0 Technology? 28
  • 29. 0 Question: How is language shift in autochthonous communities similar or different to language shift in immigrant communities? 0 Question: Which is more important for understanding language shift – the language a person speaks, or the language they teach their children? 29
  • 30. How should we respond? 0 “Let them die in 0 “it is most urgent to peace.”11 document languages before they disappear”7 0 “It is paternalistic of 0 “our global village must linguists to assume that be truly multicultural they know what is best and multilingual, or it for the community.”8 will not exist at all.”14 0 “Patwa is keeping back 0 “Language death is a the children.”15 terrible loss, to all who come into contact with it”5 30
  • 31. Subjectivity and Language 0 Question: Is the value of language objective or subjective? (Note: subjective ≠ arbitrary) 0 Question: Are languages mutually exclusive? Are they even in direct competition? 31
  • 32. Conclusion 0 Language endangerment is complicated. 0 (Sorry if you were hoping for a straightforward conclusion.) 0 Overly simplistic representations don’t give us the insights we need to actually address the issue. 0 A great deal more research needs to be done in understanding the precise causes of language shift, so that communities can best address this phenomenon in the way that is most appropriate for them. 32
  • 33. Contact Information Daniel W. Hieber Rosetta Stone dhieber@rosettastone.com Slides and other presentations available on website: www.danielhieber.com 33
  • 34. Further Reading 0 EndangeredLanguages.com 0 Dying Words by Nicholas Evans 0 When Languages Die by K. David Harrison 0 ‘Why do languages die?’ by Daniel W. Hieber 34
  • 35. Sources 1. Boynton, Jessica. 2011. The cost of language mobilisation. SSILA Summer Meeting, Boulder, CO. 2. Crystal, David. 2000. Language Death. Cambridge University Press. 3. Endangered Languages. 2012. The Linguist List at Eastern Michigan University and The University of Hawaii at Manoa. http://www.endangeredlanguages.com 4. Evans, Nicholas. 2010. Dying Words: Endangered Languages and What They Have to Tell Us. Wiley- Blackwell. 5. Grenoble, Lenore A. 2011. Language ecology and endangerment. In Peter K. Austin & Julia Sallabank (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages. 27-45. Cambridge University Press. 6. Haugen, Einar. 1972. The Ecology of Language: Essays by Einar Haugen. Stanford University Press. 7. Krauss, Michael E. 1992. The world’s languages in crisis. Language 68(1): 4-10. 8. Ladefoged, Peter. 1992. Another view of endangered languages. Language 68(4): 809-811. 9. Lee, R. B. & I. DeVore (eds.). 1968. Man the Hunter. Aldine. 10. Lewis, M. Paul (ed.), 2009. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 16th edn. SIL International. Online version: http://www.ethnologue.com 11. Malik, Kenan. 2000. Let them die. Prospect, November. Online version: http://www.kenanmalik.com/essays/die.html 12. Moseley, Christopher (ed.). 2010. Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger, 3rd edn. UNESCO. Online version: http://www.unesco.org/culture/languages-atlas/en/atlasmap.html 13. Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution (Cambridge Approaches to Language Contact). Cambridge University Press. 14. Nettle, Daniel & Suzanne Romaine. 2000. Vanishing Voices: The Extinction of the World’s Languages. Oxford University Press. 15. Paugh, Amy L. 2012. Playing with Languages: Children and Change in a Caribbean Village. Berghahn Books. 16. Sutherland, William J. 2003. Parallel extinction risk and global distribution of languages and species. Nature 423: 276-9. 35

Editor's Notes

  1. Revitalization efforts – Patwa; outsourcing education of one’s children