Presentation for the Entrepreneurial Modelling meeting at the ICCE Goldsmiths, University of London.
In collaboration with: Antonis Anagnostidis, Frances du Pille, Giulia Piu, Petra Havelska, Tess Bygge, Victoria Gill and Viviane Williams.
40. methodology
unpa!d internships
in the creative industries
41. lon
d in
s
o
g s pa ce
n
team member and
a problem
qu
p e r i th n o
choosing a problem
e ti
a
in
x
it
e
ta
y of liv
l
e
co
n
spor
mplexi
c e
b e
an
y
u
tr
t
t t of c
h e publi
o f s l a c
n k
s
e
c
s
e
o
o
a c
f
n g
m m u
o p
s p
s i
n
it n
e
o
/ p u b i
c
y l o
o i o
n
d
u n pa i point of view of each
team member about
f
t
s
in
his/her problem
i
ie
t h
te
c o n t
ustr
rnships
e
ind
r o
a n
ve
ti
i
d s th
e crea
1
42. lon
d in
s
o
g s pa ce
n
team member and
a problem
qu
p e r i th n o
choosing a problem
e ti
a
in
x
it
e
ta
y of liv
l
e
co
n
spor
mplexi
c e
b e
an
y
u
tr
t
t t of c
h e publi
o f s l a c
n k
s
e
c
s
e
o
o
a c
f
n g
m m u
o p
s p
s i
n
it n
e
o
/ p u b i
c
y l o
o i o
n
d
u n pa i point of view of each
team member about
f
t
s
in
his/her problem
i
ie
t h
te
c o n t
ustr
rnships
e
ind
r o
a n
ve
ti
i
d s th
discussion and exchange about e crea
a particular problem
(identifying feasability)
2
43. lon
d in
s
o
g s pa ce
the problem to solve
n
team member and
a problem
qu
p e r i th n o
choosing a problem
e ti
a
in
x
it
e
ta
y of liv
l
e
co
n
spor
mplexi
c e
b e
an
y discussion and ex-
u
tr
t
t t of c change between team
h e publi
members
unpaid
o f s internships in l a c
the creative
n k
s
e
c
s
e
o
industries
o
a c
f
n g
m m u
o p
s p
s i
n
it n
e
o
/ p u b i
c
y l o
o i o
n point of view of each
team member about
f
t
his/her problem
i
t h
c o n t
r oe
a
d s
discussion and exchange about
a particular problem
(identifying feasability)
3
44. the research
4
}
}
solutions
theory construction: an attempt
-Petra-
to find or describe principles that explain
how things work the way they do.
research II the solutIons
}
internships
}
models of
-Viviane-
trend analysis: predicting or
forecasting the future direction of events.
stats and current
} evaluation: research to determine
}
trends
whether a program or project followed the
-Tess-
prescribed procedures and achieved the
stated outcomes.
internships in
MethOdOLOGY
the creative
industries
unpaid
}
law and
politics
}
-Antonis-
comparison: two or more existing
situations are studied to determine their
similarities and differences.
} analysis: classes of data are collected
}
benefits
and studies conducted to discern patterns
-Giulia-
and formulate principles that might guide
future action
research I the subject
the problem
}
-Victoria-
analysis: classes of data are collected
and studies conducted to discern patterns
and formulate principles that might guide
future action
}
case study: the background,
background
development, current conditions and
} environmental interactions of one or
}
-Fran-
more individuals, groups, communities,
businesses or institutions is observed,
recorded and analyzed for stages of
patterns in relation to internal and external
influences.
45. the problem
research I
the subject
what
why
the structure
how
who
identify purpose:
hypothesis
research II
the solutions
generate ideas
evaluate
conclusion
5
46. the problem
research I
the subject
• background what
• the • what the law • who is the must
• the problems government allows? affected?
• benefits why • the industry • why it has become • does the industry
really benefits?
the structure
common?
• laws and • universities
politics how • how internships • internships:
an overused
work through
• graduates different word, wrong
+_+_+ disciplines? connotations
who
• Angela
Mcrobbie’s
research identify purpose:
• enternships.com hypothesis
• interviews
• who’s
research II
• videos: lyle responsability? the solutions
the intern
• the role of
university as • stats and generate ideas
a trustworthy trends
player
• current models
evaluate
conclusion
• existing models
6
47. web site
the infrastructure
facilitate
collaboration
instant and
http://sites.google.com/site/unpaidcreatives/ remote access
to database
7
51. research process decision process final process
disengagement 20%
40%
minimum effort
x x 60%
x 80%
engagement 100%
team goal
the team
research process decision process final process
disengagement 20%
40%
minimum effort
x x 60%
x
80%
engagement 100%
personal goal
11
52. research process decision process final process
disengagement 20%
40%
minimum effort 60%
80%
engagement 100%
team goal
the team
research process decision process final process
disengagement 20%
40%
minimum effort 60%
80%
engagement 100%
personal goal
12
53. research process decision process final process
disengagement 20%
40%
minimum effort 60%
80%
engagement 100%
team goal
the team
research process decision process final process
disengagement 20%
40%
minimum effort 60%
80%
engagement 100%
personal goal
13