Reston Transportation Funding Plan: Updates and Recommendations: Jan. 19, 2017

County of Fairfax, Virginia
Reston Transportation Funding Plan
Community Meeting
January 19, 2017
Tom Biesiadny, Janet Nguyen
Fairfax County Department of Transportation
Department of Transportation
1
Updates and Recommendation
*This presentation was prepared by Fairfax County Department of Transportation staff.
It has not been endorsed by the Board of Supervisors.

Outline
• Review – Projects, Cost Estimates, Allocation
Framework, Public/Private Funding, and
Funding Scenarios
• Feedback from the Community, Stakeholders,
and the Advisory Group
• Staff Proposal, Scenario 12
• Next Steps/Schedule
• Discussion
2

Project List
and Estimates
Projects to be included in
the Reston Transportation
Funding Plan were either
recommended by the
Reston Phase I
Comprehensive
Amendment or were
necessary to support the
plan.
All estimates are planning
level estimates. Network
Analysis study will refine
the road widths and will
provide phasing. Staff is
developing project
prioritization.
*Project is partially or
completely located in
Dranesville District.
Remaining projects are
located in Hunter Mill
District.
3
Please note that the information provided in this presentation is not final and is for discussion purposes only.
RESTON FUNDING PLAN PROJECTS
Projects
Estimate as of
2016
Roadway Improvements
DTR Crossing at Soapstone Overpass – Sunrise Valley Drive to Sunset Hills Road $170,000,000
DTR Town Center Parkway Underpass – Sunrise Valley Drive to Sunset Hills Road $170,000,000
Fox Mill Road Widening – Reston Parkway to Monroe Street $60,000,000
Monroe Street Widening – West Ox Road to Town of Herndon* $80,000,000
Pinecrest Road Extension – South Lakes Drive to Sunrise Valley Drive $25,000,000
Reston Parkway Widening – South Lakes Drive to DTR $25,000,000
Fairfax County Parkway - DTR to West Ox Road Widening $80,000,000
Fairfax County Parkway at Sunrise Valley Drive (Interchange) $400,000,000
South Lakes Drive Overpass – Sunrise Valley Drive to Sunset Hills Road $90,000,000
West Ox Road Widening – Lawyers Road to Centreville Road $100,000,000
Total Roadway Improvements $1,200,000,000
Intersection Improvements
Centreville Road at Sunrise Valley Drive* $10,000,000
Centreville Road/DTR EB on/off Ramps* $1,500,000
Hunter Mill Road/Sunset Hills Road $3,500,000
Reston Parkway/Bluemont Way $4,000,000
Reston Parkway/DTR WB on/off Ramps $5,000,000
Reston Parkway/New Dominion Parkway $5,000,000
Reston Parkway/Sunrise Valley Drive $15,000,000
Wiehle Avenue/DTR EB on/off Ramps $600,000
Total Intersection Projects $44,600,000
Grid Network $1,021,000,000
Total $2,265,600,000

Reston Funding Plan
Allocation Framework
Six options were proposed to the Advisory Group
as methods of allocating costs. This allocation
has been the basis for discussion of funding
scenarios.
In this framework, public and private revenues will
share costs, approximately equally.
Reston Roadway projects would be paid for with
public revenues.
Intersections and the Grid would be paid for with
private revenues.
Staff believes it is important to have a
methodology and rationale behind proposed
strategies to support decision making.
4
Allocation Option 5: Project Category
Project Estimate Allocation ($)
Reston Roadways $1,200,000,000
Public Share 100% $1,200,000,000
Private Share 0% $0
Reston Intersections $44,600,000
Public Share 0% $0
Private Share 100% $45,000,000
Grid $1,021,000,000
Public Share 0% $0
Private Share 100% $1,021,000,000
Total $2,265,600,000
Public Share 53% $1,200,000,000
Private Share 47% $1,065,600,000
*The public private split for the Tysons Transportation Funding plan is 56/44.

Public Share of Funding Plan
5
• Individual totals by
funding source may
change, but the
County will remain
committed to funding
the public share of the
Board approved
Reston Funding Plan.
PUBLIC REVENUE SOURCES
Revenue Source Amount
Federal
Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) $155,000,000
Federal Discretionary Grant Programs (TBD) $0
Total Federal Revenues $155,000,000
State
Smart Scale (HB2) (Construction District Program and State High Priority
Program) $174,500,000
Total State Revenues $174,500,000
Regional
Northern Virginia Transportation Authority (NVTA) 70% Regional Funds $580,550,000
Total Regional Revenues $580,550,000
Local
Commercial & Industrial Tax (C&I) $79,750,000
General Obligation (G.O.) Bonds $194,000,000
NVTA 30% Local Funds $16,200,000
Total Local Revenues $289,950,000
Total Public Revenues $1,200,000,000

Private Share of Funding Plan
6
Grid estimate $1,021,000,000
Less: Expected developer in-kind contributions to the Grid $716,000,000
Net funding need from private share for Grid $305,000,000
Add: Intersections $45,000,000
Contributions Needed Towards Private Share From Other
Funding Mechanism(s) $350,000,000
Total Private Share (Total Grid + Intersection Improvements) $1,066,000,000
A significant portion of the total private share is expected to be paid for through in-kind contributions to
the grid from developers as redevelopment occurs. The balance of the private share is expected to be
paid for through contributions to another funding mechanism(s).
Contributions Needed Towards Private Share from Other Funding Mechanism(s)

7
Only properties within the Reston
TSAs (brown line) would be subject to
any proposed Service District.

8
Funding Scenarios Proposed
to meet $350M Private Share
Balance
Contribution Rates and Related Shortfall
Road Fund Tax/Service District over Reston TSAs
Residential/DU Commercial/SF
Other Funding
Needed to
meet $350M
($M)
Tax
District
Rate
Service
District
Rate
Tax/Service District
Contribution to
$350M (%)
Scenario 1: Tysons residential rates $2,571 $18.34 $0 N/A N/A 0%
Scenario 2: Tysons commercial rates $4,627 $12.63 $0 N/A N/A 0%
Scenario 3: Rates proportional to
development in Reston TSAs
$7,058 $5.88 $0 N/A N/A 0%
Scenario 4: Tysons rates and Service District
over Reston TSAs
$2,571 $12.63 $79 N/A 0.012 22%
Scenario 5: Tysons rates and Tax District over
Reston TSAs
$2,571 $12.63 $79 0.025 N/A 22%
Scenario 6: Tysons Rates and Service District
over Reston &TSAs
$2,571 $12.63 $79 0.025 or 0.012 22%
over Small Tax District 5
$2,571 $12.63 $79 0.025 or 0.012 22%
Scenario 8: General adjustment from Tysons
rates, -11%
$2,288 $11.24 $108 0.035 or 0.017 31%
Scenario 9: Specific adjustments from Tysons
rates, +15% residential, -19% commercial
$2,957 $10.23 $80 0.025 or 0.013 23%
Scenario 10: Splits $350M equally between
Road Fund/Service District and maintains
Tysons proportions for Res/Com road fund
rates
$1,635 $8.19 $175 N/A 0.027 50%
Scenario 11: Similar total expense per Road
Fund (residential) contribution and Service
District (avg. home) contribution
$2,080 $10.09 $132 N/A 0.020 38%
*Scenario 6 and 7 would not generate significant amounts of additional revenue to warrant implementation of an expanded service district and were removed from
consideration. Please note that the information provided in this presentation is not final and is for discussion purposes only.

Feedback from Advisory Group
The Advisory Group created a written document that provided the
group’s initial high level feedback on the proposed Reston
Transportation Funding Plan on September 26, 2016.
• Agreement on public/private allocation framework.
– Roadway Improvements to be paid by public funding.
– Intersection Improvements to be paid by private funding.
– Grid Network to be paid by private funding.
• The tax district option is unrealistic and could be removed from
further consideration for the funding plan.
• The Advisory Group is most interested in funding options that
include both proffer (road fund) and service district revenue streams.
9

Feedback from Advisory Group Cont.
• The Advisory Group team recognizes that transportation is but one
of many important development objectives under the comprehensive
plan update that must be funded.
• There is agreement that there should be a sunset provision that
terminates the Road Fund and service tax district when all the
projects for which they were intended have been funded.
• The Advisory Group directed staff to pursue all further analysis on
options 8, 10, and 11.
10

Funding Scenarios 8, 10, and 11
Scenario 8: Uses the Tysons combined rates for residential and commercial and adjusts them downwards
by 11% based on an average assessed value difference between all properties in Reston TSAs and Tysons
in 2015. A service district over only the Reston TSAs fills any remaining funding needs based on the adjusted
rates.
Scenario 10: Splits the private funding shortfall ($350M) equally between a road fund and a service district
and determines rates that maintain the same residential to commercial road fund contribution ratio as Tysons.
Scenario 11: At an average annual service district contribution rate of $0.02/$100 of assessed value, a
current resident in the Reston TSAs with an average residence of approximately $260,000 assessed value
will have an out of pocket expense, paid over 40 years, approximately equal to a residential per dwelling unit
contribution of a developer.
11
Road Fund, New Development – Reston TSAs All Properties – Reston TSAs
Residential* Commercial Service District Contribution
to $350M
(%)Scenario
Rate per
Dwelling Unit Revenue
Rate per
Square Foot Revenue Rate+ Revenue
8 $2,288 $87,000,000 $11.24 $155,000,000 $0.017 $108,000,000 31%
10 $1,635 $62,000,000 $8.19 $113,000,000 $0.027 $175,000,000 50%
11 $2,080 $79,000,000 $10.09 $139,000,000 $0.020 $132,000,000 38%
+Rate per $100 of assessed value*Residential includes apartments.

Activity Since Last Community Meeting
November 7, 2016
• Advisory Group Meetings
– November 21, 2016
– December 19, 2016
• Staff Develops Funding Scenario 12 after the Advisory Group
Meeting in November and before the Board Transportation
Committee Meeting in December
• Board Transportation Committee Meeting
• Reston Association Board Meeting
• Stakeholder Meeting
– January 13, 2017
12

Summary of Feedback from Community Meetings
• Reston should not be compared to Tysons.
– The Tysons Transportation Funding Plan served as a template or
starting point for development of the Reston Transportation Funding
Plan.
– While staff recognizes that there are differences between Reston and
Tysons, the funding plans will share some similar foundations.
– Staff does not want to create a situation where the transportation
funding plan would create a competitive advantage or disadvantage to
any area in the County.
– Ultimately, the Reston Transportation Funding Plan is being developed
to fit the needs of the Reston TSAs and will be different in several areas
from the Tysons Transportation Funding Plan.
13

Summary of Feedback from Community Meetings (Cont.)
• Developers should pay for all transportation costs associated with
development. The revenues from homeowners should not be used
to pay for streets that benefit developers.
– Rezoning applications are required to submit a traffic impact analysis (TIA).
Each development must mitigate the transportation impacts of their development.
– Developers will also be asked to contribute towards the Road Fund in
conjunction with any development of property within the Reston TSAs such as
change in use, zoning district, or increases in site development density.
– Still, there will be necessary improvements in the TSAs that are not attributable
to a single development and the cost of such improvements will be shared. The
benefits of these improvements apply to all who live in, work in, or visit Reston.
These benefits include enhanced road connectivity, new sidewalks and bike
lanes, and increased access to the Metrorail stations.
14

• Developments that create more traffic impact should pay for more of
the improvements.
– Rezoning applications are required to submit a traffic impact analysis
(TIA). Each development must mitigate the transportation impacts of
their development.
– Additionally, a Road Fund would address the scale of a development by
having developers contribute on a per dwelling unit or per square foot
basis. The magnitude of the impact will be reflected in the contributions
toward the road fund. The more dwelling units or square footage being
built, the more the developer contributes.
15

• There was concern about developers building the expected in-kind
contributions for less than the estimated total and whether corners
would be cut for cost savings.
– The total cost of the in-kind contributions to the Grid Network, is
calculated using VDOT unit costs and is a planning level estimate.
– If a developer can construct a section of the Grid Network at a lower
cost, it has no negative impact on the funding plan.
– A privately constructed Grid Network segment would be inspected by
County and VDOT inspectors and must meet required County and
VDOT standards and design guidelines to ultimately be dedicated as a
public street.
16

• Which projects are already funded in Reston?
– There are projects within Reston that have already been funded or partially funded outside of
the proposed Reston Transportation Funding Plan.
• Reston Area Metrorail Station Access Projects
(http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/fcdot/silverline/restonimp.htm), improve pedestrian, vehicle,
and bicycle connections to and from the new Silver Line Metro stations. The majority of
projects in the Reston area are being constructed as part of the Silver Line project or with
FCDOT funding to improve Metro station access. The list of projects is, in part, the result of
work undertaken by Reston Metrorail Access Group. More information about the group
can be found here: http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/fcdot/sam_study.htm
• Board of Supervisors Transportation Project Priorities Program
(http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/fcdot/cdot/projects/approved.htm), includes projects such as
Sunrise Valley Drive Walkway and Sunset Hills Road Walkway, Hunter Mill Road at
Lawyers Road spot improvements and others.
– Hunter Mill Road Study (http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/fcdot/huntermillstudy.htm), this is a
separate effort to study and address congestion on Hunter Mill Road from Sunrise Valley Drive
to the Colvin Run Bridge during the morning and evening peak hours. The study looks at
intersections and segments within the study area and examines alternatives to mitigate existing
and future conditions to ensure efficient movement of traffic. These projects are currently
unfunded and will be funded separately from the Reston Transportation Funding Plan.
17

Reston Metrorail
Access Group (RMAG)
and Wiehle Ave/Reston
Pkwy Station Access
Management Study
Projects
Recommended station
access management and
traffic improvements at the
new Silver Line Metro
stations.
More RMAG improvements
can also be found here:
http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/f
cdot/silverline/restonimp.htm
These projects are funded
separate from the Reston
Funding Plan, mostly with
public sources.
18
Project Location Project Scope
Bluemont Way & Discovery Street/Explorer
Street/Library Street
Improve crosswalks, bike facilities.
Sunset Hills Road/Old Reston Avenue Add signalized crosswalks.
Explorer Street/New Dominion Parkway Improve crosswalk.
Sunrise Valley Drive from Reston Parkway to
Soapstone Drive Missing Links
Complete shared use path north side. Add signalized
crosswalk at Colts Neck Rd.
Sunrise Valley Drive/Edmund Halley Drive Add signalized crosswalks.
Sunset Hills Road/Discovery Street Pedestrian Bridge
Walkway Extended
Add signalized crosswalk.
Reston Parkway/Dulles Toll Road Westbound On-
Ramp
Add signalized crosswalk. Remove southbound free-
flow right turn.
Reston Parkway/Dulles Toll Road Eastbound Off-
Ramp and On-Ramp
Add signalized crosswalks. Remove northbound free-
flow right turn.
Dulles Toll Road Eastbound Off-Ramp/Fairfax County
Parkway Trail
Realign trail to barrier-separated on shoulder. Realign
trail crossing. Add signalized crosswalk.
Sunset Hills Road Eastbound Off-Ramp/Fairfax
County Pkwy Trail
Realign trail crossing. Add signalized crosswalk.
Bluemont Way from Discovery Street Pedestrian
Bridge Walkway to Reston Parkway
Add sidewalk south side.
Sunset Hills Road from Town Center Parkway to
Reston Town Center Station Entrance
Complete shared use path north side.
New Dominion Parkway from Reston Parkway to
Fairfax County Parkway
Reconstruct with on-road bike lanes. Reduce median
width. Restripe with narrow lane widths.
Town Center Parkway/W&OD Trail Add access ramp at W&OD trail west side.
Town Center Parkway from Sunset Hills Road to
Baron Cameron Avenue
Sunrise Valley Drive from Reston Parkway to Fairfax
County Parkway
Sunrise Valley Drive/Reston Association Entrance Add signalized crosswalks.
Reston Bikeshare Phase 2 Bikeshare Expansion for Phase 2 Silver Line Metrorail.

• Will there be periodic reviews of the estimates?
– Yes, project estimates will be reviewed annually.
• Will the projects be prioritized?
– Yes, staff is developing project priorities from the results of the Network
Analysis. These priorities will take into account the cost-benefit of all
improvements as well as funding availability.
• Can Reston Town Center residents be included in discussions related to
the Service District?
– Staff is willing to provide additional outreach to Reston Town Center
residents.
– Will discuss Reston Town Center outreach with the Advisory Group.
19

Summary of Feedback from Stakeholder Meetings
• Those who develop early in the funding plan should not have to
contribute more to the funding plan than later developments.
– The County, expects development to occur throughout the life of the
funding plan.
– With the creation of a service district, all landowners will begin to
contribute to the funding plan immediately.
– A landowner that develops in the later years of the funding plan would
have been contributing via the service district from the day the service
district was implemented or the day they purchased the land (the latter
of the two dates). Such a landowner would also share the benefits of
the transportation improvements.
20

Summary of Feedback from Stakeholder Meetings (Cont.)
• More emphasis should be placed on a service district rather than road
funds. Service districts are bondable and more reliable.
– There are trade-offs between the use of a road fund and a service district.
– A road fund places the funding burden on new development.
– A service district spreads the funding burden over all development; both existing
and future development has to pay into a service district. The higher the service
district rate, the higher the relative funding burden on residential property.
• The road fund contribution for commercial property proposed in several of
the scenarios is too high, and will make it difficult to develop commercial
property in the Reston TSAs.
– Every development is different and staff understands that different developments
absorb different costs.
– Some adjustments made in Scenario 12.
21

Summary of Feedback from Stakeholder Meetings (Cont.)
• Are all of the improvements in the Reston Transportation Funding Plan
needed?
– Transportation improvements included in the funding plan were recommended by
the Reston Phase I Comprehensive Plan Amendment, which was the result of
the Reston Master Plan Special Study. That study took four years and included
robust community discussion and participation.
– These improvements are meant to support the plan’s vision for mixed land uses
in the Reston TSAs supported by a multi-modal transportation system.
– The Reston Network Analysis Study also verified the need for the improvements
in the Reston TSAs.
– At the beginning of the Network Analysis, each grid link was assumed to be two
lanes, so that the roads would not be overbuilt. The study has shown that none
of the links need to be widened to four lanes.
22

Advisory Group Meeting, November 21, 2016
• The Advisory Group did not reach a consensus on a final rate
scenario.
• Various members of the Advisory Group voiced that each scenario
had aspects that were preferable and that each scenario also had
aspects that were not preferable.
• There was differing opinion on the appropriate level of specificity of
any recommendation.
• The Advisory Group requested additional time to allow for the
Reston Association Board to be briefed and to discuss the funding
plan.
23

Staff Proposal: Scenario 12
Road Fund: Residential: $2,090 per dwelling unit; Commercial: $9.56 per square foot
Service District: $0.021 per $100 of assessed value
With additional information, after further discussions with the Advisory Group, and feedback from the
community and stakeholders, staff recommended a new scenario, Scenario 12, for the following
reasons:
• It includes both a road fund and service district.
• Only properties within the Reston TSAs will be affected.
• Service district collections from current homeowners in the Reston TSAs would not exceed the
current cost estimates for Intersection Improvements ($44,600,000). This means, the Grid
Network is completely paid for by commercial/industrial properties and residential owner occupied
properties built after the establishment of the funding plan.
• Rates proposed for the road fund in Scenario 12 are within a range that is not significantly above
or below road fund contribution rates in the Tysons Transportation Funding plan or other fund
areas in the County.
• The road fund and service district rates proposed in Scenario 12 are within the range of the three
scenarios for which the Advisory Group had most interest (Scenario 8, 10, and 11).
24

25
Funding Scenarios Proposed to
meet $350M Private Share
Balance
Contribution Rates and Related Shortfall
Road Fund Tax/Service District over Reston TSAs
Residential/DU Commercial/SF
Other Funding
Needed to
meet $350M
($M)
Tax
District
Rate
Service
District
Rate
Tax/Service District
Contribution to
$350M (%)
Scenario 1: Tysons residential rates $2,571 $18.34 $0 N/A N/A 0%
Scenario 2: Tysons commercial rates $4,627 $12.63 $0 N/A N/A 0%
Scenario 3: Rates proportional to development
in Reston TSAs
$7,058 $5.88 $0 N/A N/A 0%
Scenario 4: Tysons rates and Service District over
Reston TSAs
$2,571 $12.63 $79 N/A 0.012 22%
Scenario 5: Tysons rates and Tax District over
Reston TSAs
$2,571 $12.63 $79 0.025 N/A 22%
over Reston &TSAs
$2,571 $12.63 $79 0.025 or 0.012 22%
over Small Tax District 5
$2,571 $12.63 $79 0.025 or 0.012 22%
Scenario 8: General adjustment from Tysons
rates, -11%
$2,288 $11.24 $108 0.035 or 0.017 31%
Scenario 9: Specific adjustments from Tysons
rates, +15% residential, -19% commercial
$2,957 $10.23 $80 0.025 or 0.013 23%
Scenario 10: Splits $350M equally between
Road Fund/Service District and maintains Tysons
proportions for Res/Com road fund rates
$1,635 $8.19 $175 N/A 0.027 50%
Scenario 11: Similar total expense per Road
Fund (residential) contribution and Service
District (avg. home) contribution
$2,080 $10.09 $132 N/A 0.020 38%
Scenario 12: Staff Proposal $2,090 $9.56 $139 N/A 0.021 40%

Funding Scenarios 8, 10, 11, and 12
26
Road Fund, New Development – Reston TSAs Service District, All Properties in Reston TSAs
Residential Commercial Service District Contribution
to $350M
(%)Scenario Rate Revenue Rate Revenue Scenario Rate Revenue
8 $2,288 $87,264,320 $11.24 $154,412,602 8 $0.017 $108,323,078 31%
10 $1,635 $62,358,900 $8.19 $112,512,385 10 $0.027 $175,128,715 50%
11 $2,080 $79,331,200 $10.09 $138,614,160 11 $0.020 $132,054,640 38%
12 $2,090 $79,712,600 $9.56 $131,287,400 12 $0.021 $139,000,000 40%
• Apartments would contribute towards the residential road fund rates.
• Service district rate is shown as the annual average rate per $100 of assessed value.
• Revenues shown do not account for inflation and are total revenues over 40 years.

Funding Scenarios 8, 10, 11, and 12
27
67%
8%
12%
9%
4%
SCENARIO 12
67%
7%
13%
9%
4%
SCENARIO 11
67%
8%
15%
7%3%
SCENARIO 8
67%
6%
11%
11%
5%
SCENARIO 10
Percent Contribution to Total
Private Share ($1.066B):
Developers and
Commercial Property
Owners
Residential Property
Owners

Share of Contributions from Owner Occupied Residential Units
• In response to feedback from the public meeting, several citizens expressed
displeasure for the potential to fund the grid of streets with service district funds.
• It is unknown what proportion of new residences in the Reston TSAs will be
constructed as owner occupied residential dwelling units (OORDU).
• The current proportion of OORDUs in the Reston TSAs is approximately 22% of the
total assessed value.
• Using a very aggressive and highly unlikely projection, 75% of future growth of all
residential dwelling units being assigned as OORDUs, the total contribution to the
service district at an average annual rate of $0.021/$100 of assessed value is
approximately $42 million.
• This shows the OORDUs do not contribute more than the cost of the intersection
improvements (estimated at approximately $45 million as of 2016).
• New developments and commercial and industrial properties will contribute the
amounts needed to cover the grid network and a portion of the intersection
improvements.
28

Share of Contributions Owner Occupied Residential Units – Scenario 12
29
Owner Occupied Residential Dwelling Unit (OORDU) Analysis Reston TSAs
S.D. Rate $0.021 cents per $100
Years 5 Year Aggregate Contribution Percent OORDU OORDU Contribution
2017-2021 10,444,896$ 22% 2,297,877$
2022-2026 12,423,086$ 24% 2,981,541$
2027-2031 14,401,276$ 26% 3,744,332$
2032-2036 16,379,466$ 28% 4,586,250$
2037-2041 18,357,656$ 30% 5,507,297$
2042-2046 20,335,846$ 32% 6,507,471$
2047-2051 22,314,036$ 34% 7,586,772$
2052-2056 24,292,226$ 36% 8,745,201$
Total 138,948,487$ 41,956,741$
Total Percent to Service District 30%
Total Percent to Private Share 4%
Total Percent to Funding Plan 2%

Financial Impact of a Service District by Scenario
30
Residential
Assessed
Value
$260,000* $500,000 $750,000
Option
Service
District Rate
Annual
40 Year
Total
Annual
40 Year
Total
Annual
40 Year
Total
8 $0.017 $44.20 $1,768 $85.00 $3,400 $127.50 $5,100
10 $0.027 $70.20 $2,880 $135.00 $5,400 $202.50 $8,100
11 $0.020 $52.00 $2,080 $100.00 $4,000 $150.00 $6,000
12 $0.021 $54.60 $2,184 $105.00 $4,200 $157.50 $6,300
Commercial
Assessed
Value
$1,000,000 $15,000,000 $50,000,000
Option
Service
District Rate
Annual
40 Year
Total
Annual 40 Year Total Annual
40 Year
Total
8 $0.017 $170 $6,800 $2,550 $102,000 $8,500 $340,000
10 $0.027 $270 $10,800 $4,050 $162,000 $13,500 $540,000
11 $0.020 $200 $8,000 $3,000 $120,000 $10,000 $400,000
12 $0.021 $210 $8,400 $3,150 $126,000 $10,500 $420,000
*Approximate average assessed value in Reston TSAs.

Board Transportation Committee Meeting,
December 13, 2016
• Presentation was well received by the Board.
• Staff Proposed Funding Scenario 12.
• Several keys points of feedback were reaffirmed; including not
exceeding the funding plan duration for the service district and road
fund and welcoming additional feedback.
• An inquiry was made into whether or not cost estimates for the
projects could be revised.
• It was suggested to advertise a window of rates for the service
district to allow for additional feedback and flexibility.
31

Advisory Group Meeting, December 19, 2016
• Discussion about focus of the Advisory Group.
– Fine tuning could potentially be left to staff and the Board of
Supervisors.
• The community’s input was more concerned about the service
district and that their contributions would not be paying into the grid.
• There was general discussion on the proposed rates.
– The group and the community preferred advertising a specific rate,
rather than a window of rates for the purpose of public hearing for board
endorsement of the funding plan.
• The Advisory Group endorsed funding scenario 12.
32

Next Steps/Tentative Schedule
33
Date Event
January 24, 2017 • Request authorization to advertise public hearing on Reston
Transportation Funding Plan.
February 28, 2017 • Public hearing to seek Board approval of Reston
Transportation Funding Plan.
• Request authorization to advertise public hearing on
associated Service District over only the Reston TSAs.
• Board adoption of Road Fund and Road Fund Guidelines.
March/April 2017 • Public hearing on specific Service District proposal over only
the Reston TSAs.

Comments/Questions?
34

Reston Transportation Funding Plan: Updates and Recommendations: Jan. 19, 2017

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to Reston Transportation Funding Plan: Updates and Recommendations: Jan. 19, 2017

Similar to Reston Transportation Funding Plan: Updates and Recommendations: Jan. 19, 2017 (20)

More from Fairfax County

More from Fairfax County (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Reston Transportation Funding Plan: Updates and Recommendations: Jan. 19, 2017