Model Call Girl in Lado Sarai Delhi reach out to us at š9953056974š
Ā
History Is One Second Ago, and How You Can Intervene in the Future
1. History is One Second Ago, and
How You Can Intervene
in the Future
Rick Prelinger
Bellingham, May 2010
Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial license
Monday, December 27, 2010
Thanks!
2. Monday, December 27, 2010
so today my angle will be radical traditionalism. what? seems like an oxymoron. does it mean
sticking our head in the ground while the rest of the world speeds past us? is it just talking the talk
rather than walking the walk, trying to have our cake and eat it too?
how do we, as artists and makers, deal with changes that might be unsettling? do we plunge into
the future? do we stick with whatās familiar? thereās a lot of pressure to decide. one thing we might
do is ask how real these questions are, whether they represent actual alternatives.
3. Monday, December 27, 2010
is freer culture all about working for free? are we losing our shot at the great billable event in the
sky? are the new models of production and distribution just a big steal? will emergent makers and
nonprofessionals destroy culture?
4. Monday, December 27, 2010
Maybe the new models arenāt really so radical or so threatening.
We might ļ¬nd some answers by looking at some of the ways we think about history, and then
recalling a bit of the history of archives.
6. Monday, December 27, 2010
Itās not a warm and fuzzy place, not a place to look for consensus.
7. Monday, December 27, 2010
If you ask historical questions, donāt expect simple answers.
8. Monday, December 27, 2010
And if you ask who controls history, donāt expect a simple answer either.
9. Monday, December 27, 2010
And yet, thereās tremendous interest in history, and itās become part of the cultural mainstream.
This can often lead us to ask complex and penetrating questions. Who and what inhabited this
place before us? Who were our ancestors and how did they live? What were people thinking and
doing during this or that war, this or that storm, this or that migration?
10. Wall separating Black and White neighborhoods, Detroit, 1951
Monday, December 27, 2010
So our natural interest in history leads many of us in the direction of historical documents. Now,
historical documents may be loaded ā maybe even incendiary. They may trace complicated, even
violent histories. As a consequence, sometimes people resist evidence, sometimes they hide it,
sometimes they destroy it.
11. Monday, December 27, 2010
And sometimes they try to wrap history in scarcity (just like almost everything else). They imagine that it is
valuable, they try to make money from it. I guess I do that too. But thereās also history that belongs to a
community, that might be shared, thatās deļ¬ned as no oneās private property. Thatās a traditional way of
thinking about knowledge thatās now coming back into focus.
12. Las Vegas, Nevada
Monday, December 27, 2010
So thereās one big question to keep in mind ā should traces of history live in private hands, or should we insist
that history, heritage and even culture be common property? And what would it mean to call it common property,
anyway?
13. Monday, December 27, 2010
So today Iām going to begin by talking a little about history and how itās ļ¬ltered through archives, and how we might
imagine different ways of collecting and different kinds of archives, practices that better serve the interests both of people
now living and those yet to be born. And then Iām going to segue into a little bit of our own history, milk it for what it
might mean, and talk about some of the new models weāve been working with. Then I want to look at these
models and talk about what I call "historical intervention" -- how we can inject the past into the present to change the
future.
14. Monday, December 27, 2010
ok, so who am I to talk about all this?
I sometimes call myself a recovered archivist, but itās hard to recover from being an archivist, maybe
Iām kind of a meta-archivist now
i sometimes think of myself as a maker (one feature-length ļ¬lm)
for sure Iām an outsider librarian
and, oh yes, i sell footage for a living
15. why
are
archives
important?
Monday, December 27, 2010
so why are archives important?
well, obviously: historical evidence is fragile. Much has disappeared. The canonical missions of
archives are to preserve historical records ā to make them accessible ā to organize, describe and
contextualize them.
16. Sony PetaSite mass media storage
Monday, December 27, 2010
Well, so what?
We have a kind of reverence about archives. It is vague, not reality-based. People expect archives to be there when they
need them. We say, ātheyāre doing important work,ā the same way we might praise an oil spill responder, a garbage
collector, a cop who arrests a driver thatās hit a cyclist.
17. Monday, December 27, 2010
But classically archives belong to larger organizations: governments, churches, universities,
corporations, even families. Theyāre usually not public institutions. Like many children, they were
conceived to fulļ¬ll the agendas of their parents. They make their own rules. Most of the time,
except in special cases (like some government agencies), they can choose whether or not their
collections will be open, and lay down conditions for access to and use of their materials.
18. Welcome to SFO
Monday, December 27, 2010
It might actually be revealing to think of archives as gatekeepers. They exercise practical control
over historical materials. They can arbitrate and administer peoplesā connections with their history.
They can let pass certain histories, block others.
Is this good? We might answer this in different ways, depending on which histories we agree with.
19. Monday, December 27, 2010
But this means that archives can be institutions of denial as much as institutions of memory.
This means they can practice strategic forgetting, tactical denial.
We know they have done this time and again.
20. Monday, December 27, 2010
So a quiet, dusty collection might in fact possess the potential to sustain or destroy consciousness, to control how we
understand our history, and ultimately control how we remember.
21. Monday, December 27, 2010
Stewart Brand was right in a way: information wants to be free. The massive secret archives of the Soviet Union
opened, to some extent, for a time in the 1990s, and weāve recently heard about how human rights researchers
stumbled on the secret police archives in Guatemala, and are now doing conservation work and digitizing them.
22. Monday, December 27, 2010
But right this moment, countless archival records that we are not allowed to see are being
generated. Some of them will be destroyed, but many of them are likely to ļ¬nd their way into the
public domain. It often takes more energy to repress than it does to release.
23. Monday, December 27, 2010
So it might take longer than weād like, but most secrets get out eventually.
On the other hand, culture thatās not secret, but simply under copyright, may never escape the
archive.
Consequently, the archive needs help to pull the doors open. This means us.
24. Monday, December 27, 2010
We have a wonderful infrastructure of public, private and personal archives in the world, but we
have very little guarantee that we can see, hear, or touch what we need to, now or in the future.
Public libraries have an ethic of access and a tradition of openness. Archives donāt have that yet,
and we donāt have a strategy to move in that direction. Nor do we have a culture of risk-taking.
25. Monday, December 27, 2010
So using historical materials to intervene in the present and shape the future is a very old practice,
but it started to hit big in the 1970s, when media began to embrace the past, not always for the
right reasons.
27. movement from institutional to individual production
Monday, December 27, 2010
In the 1970s and 1980s, people typically needed groups and organizations to make work. But in the past twenty years
production has shifted to something people do themselves. The tools got cheaper and easier. And at the same time social
and cultural history became a mass interest. Now people are making work all by themselves. This is where the proļ¬le of
the archival user starts to change. And this is where the old-school media maker might start to feel threatened.
28. entitlement
Monday, December 27, 2010
Many archivists are noticing that people are beginning to feel quite a sense of entitlement regarding archival collections.
They sometimes make demands that are really difļ¬cult to address. On the positive side, weāve ourselves discovered that
people develop passionate interest in unedited archival footage; they donāt care about editing, narration and background
music, they want to see the original document! And many people remix, reedit and recontextualize the collections.
Unless remixing turns out to be a fad, just an ephemeral style, we are just at the early point of what I believe will be an
enduring and robust sector of media culture.
30. Monday, December 27, 2010
But overall, what we are seeing is the abolition of archival privilege, a signiļ¬cant growth in the ability to see, if not
to touch, archival imagery. (Iāll talk about ātouchā in a bit.) Archives no longer decide, or can decide, who their
users are going to be; those that try to are ļ¬ghting a losing battle. There is a parallel here in the world of
mediamaking: the āred velvet curtainā that many mediamakers have historically striven for -- in the States this
would mean that your doc premieres on HBO or PBS prime-time, that it has a major theatrical release, etc. Only a
few makers have that privilege. Now a different set of factors, some impossible to predict, rule. You canāt
necessarily control who will see (and who will pay to see) your work.
31. Monday, December 27, 2010
And somewhere around here is where my own experience starts to kick in....
32. Monday, December 27, 2010
Back to 1980. Iām a college dropout and working as a typesetter. This is now pretty much an
extinct job. I move to New York hoping to work my way into working on a ļ¬lm crew. This doesnāt
work and I keep on typesetting.
33. Monday, December 27, 2010
Now itās 1982. Friends of mine make a documentary called Atomic Cafe. Itās a big success for a
doc, and plays all over North America. Theyāre given money to make another movie, which they call
Heavy Petting. Itās about sex and romance in America after World War II. Iāve always been interested
in archival ļ¬lm, and their budget is low, so they hire me as research director. I get to quit working
midnight to 8 am shifts.
34. CBS News library,Washington, DC 2009
Monday, December 27, 2010
I start to learn about archival research -- who owns historical images and sounds, and how to pry
them loose. And I try to ļ¬gure out how to show concepts; how to show events and ideas that you
canāt look up in the old card catalogs at the network TV news archives and the newsreel collections.
I realize that to show these you need to go to the ļ¬lms that were made to condition and convince
people -- to make them into good citizens, good consumers, good workers, good students, good
boys and girls.
35. Monday, December 27, 2010
And so I was drawn to collecting educational, advertising and industrial ļ¬lms, ļ¬rst for the movie
and then for myself when the movie goes on the skids and rests for a few years. My collection got
really big really quickly.
36. Michigan Central RR terminal, Detroit
Monday, December 27, 2010
Who knows, but perhaps 500,000 ephemeral ļ¬lms were made in the US. Weāre a very media-rich
nation -- we throw away more media than most other nations produce. Most of this materialās in
the public domain. There were, and still are, many huge opportunities for the collector, archivist,
scholar, producer. This material was sitting all over the country, ignored. Hadnāt been targeted by
legacy archives. There was room for me to roam freely.
37. Monday, December 27, 2010
This was a dirty, and sometimes expensive job, but it was DIY archival practice. I traveled to many
cities in Americaās rustbelt, and collected ļ¬lms from colleges and university distribution libraries,
from high schools, from prod cos that had gone out of businesses, from labs, from people who
worked in the industry. Yet I was still only a collector.
38. Monday, December 27, 2010
Working with the Voyager Company starting in 1986 helped me realize that what I was doing both
ļ¬tted into the archival and historic contexts -- that I was doing archival work where little had been
done before, but also practicing history without a diploma. Slowly I began to ļ¬gure out what I
might be doing, and began to show ļ¬lms around the country and in Europe...did some laserdiscs,
videotapes and ultimately CD-ROMs -- I say ultimately because this was a new and promising
medium at the time.
39. accidental and uncurated work,Yorkshire Sculpture Park, UK
Monday, December 27, 2010
But life got really interesting for us when we started to have our own experiences with the gift
economy: experiments with models of plenty.
40. www.archive.org/details/prelinger
Monday, December 27, 2010
At the very end of 2000 we partnered with the Internet Archive and opened up our online collection
with about 300 archival ļ¬lms, free to download. It's now over 2,100 items. For us, the online
archives marked a move from having a repository, a collection, to convening a workshop, a place
where people went to make new work and could meet others in the process. Three years later, we
opened a library.
41. Monday, December 27, 2010
In summer 2004, my spouse Megan and I opened our private research library to the public. We are
in downtown San Francisco, in the South of Market area, in rented space that once was an industrial
laundry. When we opened, 60 of our friends spent 8 days together shelving books. Weāre
appropriation-friendly, and we encourage people to come and scan, copy, photograph the
collection. We have about 1,200 visitors per year, not counting people who visit off-site special-
event libraries we set up. We're open about two days a week -- almost every Wednesday afternoon
and evening, and usually three Sunday afternoons a month. We never know who's going to come
during open hours, so are usually surprised. We also make appointments for out-of-towners and
host a good many classes and workshops.
42. www.prelingerlibrary.org
Monday, December 27, 2010
Itās not a ļ¬lm or video collection -- itās about 50,000 books, periodical volumes, zines, maps, government
documents and maybe 30,000 items of print ephemera. Each Wednesday, anywhere from zero to 25 people come
to use the collection and often cross-fertilize one another. Some are regulars, some come for the ļ¬rst time.
Neither of us had ever imagined a library could be such an interesting place.
43. Monday, December 27, 2010
Nor had we imagined that such community could build around a collection. But weāve had over
6,000 visitors, mostly artists, writers and real librarians who are curious about what weāre doing,
and all kinds of amazing things have come to pass because of the library. It is where we do much
of our work -- weāre independent scholars -- and increasingly itās also launched a whole bunch of
very interesting collaborations. We are doing books, installations, museum exhibits, and
residencies that are all based around the library.
44. Monday, December 27, 2010
The library is comprised of our combined personal book collection, and is centered on our
respective and combined research interests, which include, but are not limited to:
45. Monday, December 27, 2010
North American regional landscape and land use history; the interests around which we met and
ļ¬rst combined our collections and collection-building sensibilities
46. Monday, December 27, 2010
Media history; incorporating all the print materials ancillary to the ļ¬lm archive
52. Monday, December 27, 2010
We collect out-of-print materials and ephemeral literature -- works that were published without
being meant for posterity; works intended only to have a temporally or situationally limited lifespan.
These are some of the most powerful and compelling documents in the library -- in any library --
because they often shed light on moments and trends that would otherwise be described only by
historians.
53. Monday, December 27, 2010
They illuminate ideologies and cultural sensibilities that may or may not have made a lasting
impression on the official historical record.
54. Monday, December 27, 2010
The library doesnāt have a catalog. Rather, itās arranged in subject clusters that reļ¬ect a homegrown
taxonomy of knowledge, speciļ¬c to our library. The subjects begin with the local (San Francisco, where
our feet meet the ground, and progress through about 50 areas until we get to science and space). Most
libraries are query-based -- the ļ¬rst thing you see when you walk in is a computer, with a blinking cursor
inviting you to search for something. We ļ¬nd that reductive and limiting, and instead expose all the
materials so that people can exercise their powers of discovery and, as a writer said, āļ¬nd what youāre not
looking for.ā The metadata is itself the data.
55. Monday, December 27, 2010
Weāve also digitized just over 3,700 public domain books, pieces of print ephemera and periodical
volumes in partnership with the Internet Archive, which are freely available for download and reuse
without restrictions.
56. Monday, December 27, 2010
Print is dying, right? Migration to digital is irreversible, right? The āscreenagerā generation turns away from physical objects,
right? Weāve found that none of this is true. We have a constant stream of younger visitors who seem mesmerized by the
collection and pull out an incredibly diverse array of materials. They sometimes have to be literally ejected at closing time. We
ļ¬nd that paper-based materials seem to function differently in a world that is growing digital, and that digital materials tend to
take a secondary position when the paper materials are accessible and organized in a way that fascinates. We donāt think weāre
moving toward an all-digital world, but rather a hybrid analog-digital world.
57. Monday, December 27, 2010
Events also happen around the library. This slide shows the Illuminated Corridor, an outdoor audio & video remix event that took place
last October, made by musicians, performative projectionists and a bunch of artists. Most of the material came from our online archives,
some from our open library, and the center image is my movie, for which Gino Robair composed a new live score. About 400 people
came. The projections are in the parking lot on the wall of our library building.
58. Monday, December 27, 2010
We've also brought the library to Maker Faire for the last two years, which is a gathering/
conference/skillshare/performance of almost 80,000 people who are focused on reframing
technology as something you can do with your own hands and tools and reshape toward your own
ends. Last year we had about 1,500 visitors who spent hours reading old how-to books and
magazines, and made many new friends. We're a small workshop; the Faire is a huge workshop.
59. enclosure plenty
Monday, December 27, 2010
These are some of our small-scale solutions to the divide between enclosure and plenty. In a moment, Iāll look at
them critically.
60. WONDERFUL
AND
UNPREDICTABLE
THINGS
HAPPEN
WHEN
ORDINARY
PEOPLE
GET ACCESS TO
PRIMARY MATERIALS
Monday, December 27, 2010
I show this slide every time I talk, and here it is again. It bears repetition. The model of plenty pays
off in ways that we cannot begin to imagine.
61. "Given material abundance,
scarcity must be a function of boundaries."
ā Lewis Hyde, The Gift: Imagination and the Erotic Life of Property, 1979-83
Monday, December 27, 2010
So we have great tools and technologies that we hope can enable almost universal access to culture. At the same
time, technology is unevenly distributed, and it can also enable an unprecedented level of enclosure. Iām
especially thinking about digital rights management, electronic locks and keys to control access to digital
materials. All of us will have to decide which tools we want to use and which weād rather not pick up. Plenty and
scarcity arenāt inherent characteristics of culture, but attributes with which we choose to surround it. And the same
is true for openness.
62. Monday, December 27, 2010
When we make and distribute work thatās more open, weāre on our way towards redeļ¬ning how culture behaves. I believe
OPENNESS, which is a young word and still imprecise, is critical to our futures. Openness means different things in different
situations, and it can be expressed differently in different works. Thereās no single formula for openness, and no one should be
forced into manipulating their work so that it conforms to someone elseās idea of what might be open. But that said, openness
may be one strategy that helps enable makers to survive in a confused cultural and media landscape. Certainly archives need to be
more open.
63. touch
Monday, December 27, 2010
Whatās openness? Openness means not just seeing the image of a book page, but seeing the text too and being able to mix and manipulate
it. Not just watching a movie, but being free to download the shots, the EDL, the edit timeline and make your own cut. Not just the music
but the MIDI. Openness on the web means that we all have to be able to crawl, navigate and index what we ļ¬nd. And since openness isn't
just the freedom to read, listen, watch, feel, smell, taste, but also the freedom to remix in all of these sensory domains ā in the digital world
this means that you have to be able to touch the object itself and touch the code that makes it play, display or manifest itself. This is what I
mean by touch ā the ability to engage the object in a profound and unconditional manner. We need FREEDOM OF TOUCH because we
cannot anticipate today how we will want to approach culture tomorrow. We may want to compute upon it. We may want to immerse
ourselves in it. We may want to segment it.
64. tweaking the model
Monday, December 27, 2010
Now, Iād like to talk a bit about modeling the commons.
whatās the commons anyway?
65. Wikipedia 2010-05-19
Monday, December 27, 2010
The original deļ¬nition of the commons comes from land that was held in common and worked in common under English common law.
The commons goes far back, even predating the monarchy. Hereās what Wikipedia said about the commons this morning.
One rather unfortunate characteristic about the commons is that much of it is gone. Lost. Privatized or in the process of privatization.
This means we have to avoid the nostalgia trap, yearning for something that we might not even recognize if we saw it again.
66. Monday, December 27, 2010
Many projects to try to recover the lost commons have cropped up in the last few years. A lot of
these are internet-based, as the net gets many of us thinking about a world where there are no
billable events.
67. Open-source licenses
Open content initiatives
Open education resources
Creative Commons
Wikipedia & associated projects
Internet Archive
UbuWeb
p2p (some might disagree)
āWeb 2.0ā sites (billions working for free)
Monday, December 27, 2010
Here are just a few that came to mind one recent evening. Some seem genuine efforts, others
simulations. In other words, Ubuweb and p2p efforts represent a commons for some, a big steal for
others. So-called āWeb 2.0ā sites may feel like a commons to those whose lives are bound up with
the creation and exchange of information and all of the social beneļ¬ts that arise out of networked
creativity, but it remains true that the few are proļ¬ting from the labor of the many.
68. Monday, December 27, 2010
But some of these initiatives are great and there is a growing critique of rigid social and economic
structures that may not serve everyoneās needs. Perhaps we are starting to ask more of utopia than
weāve done in the past.
69. Are we relying on post-scarcity models?
Monday, December 27, 2010
Our experiences have been wonderful, but theyāve led us to ask a few difficult questions. Are we
relying on post-scarcity models? Are we modeling the kind of commons that works best for rich
people in developed countries?
70. Monday, December 27, 2010
For example, if we expect to give away content and support ourselves by touring, lecturing, selling
merchandise, or value-added businesses, these are not universal alternatives. It seems to me that
Kevin Kellyās billable attributes of free content require a highly developed economic infrastructure,
and assume a fully built-out Internet. And future economies may not support our models.
71. Monday, December 27, 2010
Are we creating a completely new organization of production? Are we developing new divisions of
labor, new kinds of property ownership, or are we simply renaming categories of exchange from
paid to free? Are we making structural changes, or are we calling the same things by different
names? Are we relying on quick ļ¬xes?
72. where do gifts really come from?
Monday, December 27, 2010
Many gifts are covertly subsidized. Our online archives is subsidized by a lot of expensive ļ¬lm-to-
videotape transfer and cheap digitization from the Internet Archive. We subsidize our library with
income from our stock footage business. Our income is increased by the footage we give away for
free, but secured because we are represented by the biggest stock image company in the world
(Getty Images), which gives us a market presence we would never otherwise have.
73. who is paying for the gift economy?
Monday, December 27, 2010
Within a capitalist system, when you see a little commons, a little corner of the gift economy, you
need to ask who is making it possible.
Many people who build pieces of great open-source projects rely on day jobs to survive. All of the
packets we send and receive ride on network infrastructure which is owned by corporations,
governments or institutions. We build cool community wireless networks, but we donāt control the
backbone that connects them to the Internet.
74. Monday, December 27, 2010
Many people praise us for opening up our archives, but we havenāt opened up our whole collection.
And would they still praise me if I let strangers into my house to sleep every night, in the same way
they praise me for letting strangers download unrestricted digital media ļ¬les? Commons here, but
not commons there.
75. Monday, December 27, 2010
In other words, if I dip just one foot into the water, am I really swimming? I still have a leg to stand
on. I donāt have to trust the salt to help me ļ¬oat.
76. new models of cultural distribution
get people thinking about
new models for distributing property
which is great
Pregnant turtle radiograph: Megan Shaw Prelinger
Monday, December 27, 2010
It is crucial to nurture and propagate commons models, but itās also important to keep track of
what kinds of economies build out around the exploitation of free things ā information, art, goods,
services, and especially utilities.
77. added value: color and sugar
Monday, December 27, 2010
Water might be free in many places, but fortunes are made in bottles and pipelines.
Much UGC is free, but the people who build the indexes and link content to advertising are cleaning
up bigtime.
78. Monday, December 27, 2010
Do commons-based models scale? What if all the other stock footage companies did what we did?
Would we lose our advantage? Would the value-added services we charge for suddenly lose all
value? In other words, would we kill the goose?
79. Monday, December 27, 2010
And while much information may be free, who owns the indexes? Who will own the segmentation,
which is often the key to touching content in a smart way? We donāt have a good history
maintaining free and common indexes, do we? CDDB, IMDB, Usenet, the Web. We control the
molecules, but not the compounds. I donāt want to have to pay much, if anything, to navigate
common territories. So we need to build free indexes and infect content such that indexes remain
free.
80. Monday, December 27, 2010
Have we ļ¬gured out ways to fully employ peopleās time and effort in a commons-based scheme, or
are we simply handing over a portion of our time and property to the commons, while holding onto
the rest?
81. Monday, December 27, 2010
The most disturbing question of all -- is free culture and the cultural commons just a fad? Will street-level
artists, entertainers and entrepreneurs, people who lead us all to the future, route around it, GET OVER IT,
move onto something else? We know remixing and sharing are deeply traditional practices, but will their
modern forms prove to be part of just another style that passes over us?
82. Monday, December 27, 2010
Is the commons a āhothouseā model, a self-consciously anachronistic model, destined for a short life? Or
is it simply an artisanal, minority practice? Will it be marginalized both at the high end by the
entertainment industry and at the low end by individual creators who have moved on to something else? I
hope neither of these is true. We need to build a commons that wonāt be a fad, a commons that will be
more than a brand.
83. Monday, December 27, 2010
None of this is intended to say we should stop experimenting. Quite the opposite! When it comes
to culture, the world of plenty is already here, and to acknowledge plenty makes culture plentiful.
84. Monday, December 27, 2010
Outside the cultural sphere, weāre dominated by complex issues : climate change, economics, energy, community, migration, how
to make technology really useful, the chameleon-like corporation (and chameleon-like marketing) and the pervasive state.
Collaborative and peer production (such as Yochai Benkler speaks about in The Wealth of Networks), decentralized industrial and
artisanal models, and evolving gift economies may offer better ways to meet some of these challenges.
We can ļ¬nd proofs of concept in the cultural space, and set useful examples without moving mountains. For me this validates
many of the small-scale experiments in which many of us are engaging.
85. NYC,
1952
Monday, December 27, 2010
And I think there are ways beyond some of these modeling problems.
As Galadriel says, āEven the smallest person can change the course of the future.ā
86. Amateur Movie Makers, ļ¬rst issue, Dec. 1926
Movie Makers, Jan. 1934
Monday, December 27, 2010
So one way out is to look to ourselves and to embrace amateurism. Amateurism has a wonderful
streak of idealism. The remarkable libertarian quote on top, and the contrarian quote below that
trashes Hollywood and praises outsider practice, testify to the commitment of early amateur
ļ¬lmmakers and the promise of the medium.
And amateurism and outsiderism can work in the contemporary world as well. It is time for a dose
of do-it-yourself.
87. Monday, December 27, 2010
Weāre seeing a huge upsurge in DIY culture and activity. Our library is itself inspired by oldskool punk culture, which encouraged
and empowered people to take up the tools around them and just do it. There are many tendrils that lead back to a set of common
assumptions: maker culture, citizen science, hacking consumer products and technology, urban agriculture, blogging as journalism
-- you will think of others.
For archives and for makers, the ļ¬eld is wide open for experimentation, and we will all gain if we are open to unconventional
ways of pushing our works out to audiences that we might not even have known existed.
88. regionalism and the lure of the local
Monday, December 27, 2010
In the archival world, new ideas originate at the periphery and infuse the center: trends like regional and
specialized archives, which are the birthplaces of innovative practices. Many of them are DIY and community-
based, like Home Movie Day and urban home movie recovery and revival projects. Home Movie Day wasnāt
invented at the Library of Congress or the Museum of Modern Art, but it is creating new constituencies and new
support for archives.
89. Garden for the Environment,
San Francisco, September 2007
Monday, December 27, 2010
The new archives donāt just live in physical and online spaces -- they take their holdings to where the people are.
As soon as it gets dark, these people will watch an archival ļ¬lm about gardening, and thereāll be loud BOOS when
Pop starts spraying pesticides on the vegetables.
90. Herbert Bayer, 1946
Monday, December 27, 2010
Just because we live in an age when mass distribution is POSSIBLE doesnāt mean we all have to make
mass media. The criteria for what makes something go viral are contradictory and opaque.
91. Monday, December 27, 2010
The rewards from working within speciļ¬c communities often outweigh the actual beneļ¬ts of mass
distribution.
92. points of departure (samples only)
zines & independent pubs
home movies ā home videos
online videos (82.900.000 on YouTube at 10:31 am, 7 April 08)
curated collections of webpages (esp. personal proļ¬les)
local seeds (let 1000 Svalbards bloom)
text messages, IMs, email
TV commercials
government radio comms
records of nature/culture interaction
Flickr
self-help books 1840-present
drugs & supplements packaging
local and community arts documentation
your own personal records
Monday, December 27, 2010
We can all be DIY archivists. There are many opportunities.
Here are a few points of departure, some directions to think about. These came to mind because
theyāre bodies of cultural material that no one is doing anything, or at least enough, to collect.
93. Decentralization
Gift
Experiment
DIY
Monday, December 27, 2010
All of these are deeply traditional practices, and in fact theyāve been lost in the world of the modern market. What I like
about these practices is that theyāre well-suited to individual and small-group practice. Each is its own answer to the
question weāre all asking, āWhat can I do?ā And in a world where most mainstream media is owned by large
corporations, where the skins that stretch over reality change faster than we can keep track, where novel forms of media
and promising technologies are born and die every day, itās radical to look to these kinds of traditions as means to sustain.
94. Monday, December 27, 2010
There are many do-or-die choices in the world today, but within culture there is near-inļ¬nite room
for experiment. Even though it often feels as if weāre living in a dystopian period, this is why itās an
exciting time to be alive.
95. Photo: Amy Balkin
Monday, December 27, 2010
High on the hill above the Arctic Ocean, dug hundreds of feet deep into rock, is the Svalbard Global
Seed Vault, perhaps the most important archives of our time. It opened on February 26th.
96. Svalbard Global Seed Vault
Monday, December 27, 2010
Protected by motion sensors and polar bears, this repository stores samples of seeds from all over the planet. It
is the archives of biodiversity, the collection of last resort. It is the honored exception to the principle of universal
archival access. You donāt want to have to go in there.
This is an essential project, but itās also been criticized for its myopic focus on ex situ storage, and for taking
away seeds from farmers who are and always have been the real breeders of plants. Biodiversity preservation
needs to happen all over the world, and farmers need to be part of it. So along with crucial projects like Svalbard,
we also need DIY and decentralized efforts.
97. Photo: Jose Maria āChemaā Barredo
Monday, December 27, 2010
Culture, like water, small animals and seeds in the wind, is hard to enclose. But culture is also fragile. If
we start to run into involuntary limits on our mobility, our metabolism, and our freedom to consume, it
will be interesting to see what forms of cultural activity survive.
98. Monday, December 27, 2010
If weāre going to keep media alive, and, more important, if weāre going to give media reasons to exist, we canāt just
follow aging models. We shouldnāt make media in a monocultural context. We need to think about how we and
our projects can be active players in the world. We need to work in a social way, to assemble public resources and
projects that have a true public presence. Our workplaces should be experimental farms, creative labs, noisy
archives, places for contemplation. We need to make lots more work, do it faster and cheaper, and strategize new
ways of putting it out.
99. Monday, December 27, 2010
The social contract between makers and audiences isnāt an abstract idea ā it is constantly made
and remade through active engagement between people and the organizations they form. And
engagement is up to us.