This document discusses opportunities and challenges in mitigating bias in library catalogs. It explores how catalogers' lived experiences influence their work and the importance of bringing those experiences into cataloging. The document addresses balancing inclusion with privacy for creators and changing subject headings. Resources on ethics in name authority control and queering library classification systems are provided to engage users in improving catalogs.
Are We Building Bridges or Walls? Opportunities and Challenges in Mitigating Bias in Our Library Catalogs
1. Are we building bridges or walls?
Opportunities and challenges in mitigating bias
in our library catalogs
Guy Frost • Marlee Givens • Erin Leach • Sofia Slutskaya • Robert Taylor
3. “The project of systematically removing evidence of bias from
library structure makes that shock rarer for students to encounter
and more difficult to demonstrate across the reference desk or in
the classroom. A queer approach to the problem of library
classification and cataloging demands that these reflections of
ideology be left as remnants in the structure and that librarians be
prepared to teach students how to read what they discover in the
text that is the knowledge organization system itself ”
Emily Drabinski
4. “I am not external to the machine. I am not a foreigner in a strange land. ”
5. Catalogers as humans with lived experience
Pack Horse Library Project, public domain
6. Erin Leach on bringing our lived experience into
the work of cataloging
7. In what ways do you leave your lived
experience at the door when you come to work?
8. Catalogers doing the work of cataloging
By Eric E Castro from San Francisco - Old card catalog, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=64749475
16. Demographics for Creators
Women and geology : who are we, where have we come from, and where are we
going?
Keyword searching creates the set; facets allow limits by demographics
17. Audience with Creator Characteristics
In the OPAC: Facets (Limits) Bibliographic Description
20. Resources: Books
The Self As Subject: Autoethnographic Research into Identity, Culture, and
Academic Librarianship. Chicago: ACRL, 2017
Ethical Questions in Name Authority Control. Sacramento, CA : Library Juice
Press, 2019
Adler M. Cruising the Library: Perversities in the Organization of Knowledge. New
York : Fordham University Press, 2017
21. Resources: Articles
Drabinski, Emily. "Queering the catalog: Queer theory and the politics of
correction." The Library Quarterly 83.2 (2013): 94-111.
Billey, Amber, Emily Drabinski, and K. R. Roberto. "What's gender got to do with
it? A critique of RDA 9.7." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 52.4 (2014): 412-
421.
Billey, Amber. “Just because we can, doesn’t mean we should: An argument for
simplicity and data privacy with name authority work in the linked data
environment.” Journal of Library Metadata 19.½ (2019): 1-17.
22. Videos and webinars
Contested Subjects: The Politics of Library Classification
https://youtu.be/6XYYPDVKQTU
Change the Subject
https://sites.dartmouth.edu/changethesubject/
Can There Be Neutrality in Cataloging? A Conversation Starter: NISO webinar
https://www.niso.org/events/2018/04/can-there-be-neutrality-cataloging-
conversation-starter
23. Lost in the Stacks programs
Uncataloging Neutrality (Interview with Amber Billey, Lost in the Stacks broadcast,
Atlanta GA, July 27, 2018, available at http://lostinthestacks.libsyn.com/ )
Our Catalogs, Ourselves (guest, Lost in the Stacks broadcast, Atlanta GA,
October 19, 2018, available at http://lostinthestacks.libsyn.com/ )
Cruising the Library (Interview with Melissa Adler, Lost in the Stacks broadcast,
Atlanta GA, February 1, 2018, available at http://lostinthestacks.libsyn.com/ )
Editor's Notes
Our lived experiences as metadata creators: What kinds of biases do we bring to this work?
Is it possible to be unbiased or neutral?
Do we set catalogers up to fail if we ask them to leave their lived experience at the door?
Changes in affiliation
Where is the line between being inclusive and allowing someone their privacy?
Consulting with people