MAPing Library Resources: Using Massive Amounts of Data for Collection Analysis
•
0 likes•270 views
Slide deck for a presentation on academic library collection analysis (e.g., Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Schoalr), as well as challenges in access to scholarly research. Presentation for the members of the Scopus Content Selection & Advisory Board, November 6, 2015.
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (10)
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (12)
Similar to MAPing Library Resources: Using Massive Amounts of Data for Collection Analysis
Similar to MAPing Library Resources: Using Massive Amounts of Data for Collection Analysis (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
MAPing Library Resources: Using Massive Amounts of Data for Collection Analysis
- 1. MAPing Library Resources: Using Massive Amounts of Data for Collection Analysis Scopus Content Selection & Advisory Board Meeting November 6, 2015 Galadriel Chilton, Head of Electronic Resource Services galadriel.chilton@uconn.edu
- 3. MAP Working Group: Galadriel Chilton, Dawn Cadogan Arta Dobbs, Alice Fairfield, Joelle Thomas, Elisabeth Umpleby A Massive Analysis Project
- 4. Coverage & Functionality Quantitative Usage Qualitative Usage Historic & Future Cost Decisions Next Steps
- 5. Photo Credit: ecstaticist Coverage & Functionality
- 6. 34,275 20,283 Journal Titles ScopusandWeb of Science Coverage [as of June 2014] 17,491 2,934 Unique Titles with ISSNs 62 Million* 54 Million Total Records 50,000* 36,000 Books * We did not have access to this content with our WoS subscription. Additional subscription fees are required for access. **Some conference proceedings are indexed as journals and we had access; however, full access to all conference papers requires an additional subscription fee. 6.5 Million** 5.8 Million Conference Papers 51.8* Million 24 Million Patents
- 7. @ Peer Institutions Iowa State University Ohio State University Purdue University Rutgers University of Georgia University of Iowa University of Minnesota – Twin Cities University of Missouri – Columbia Web of Science Scopus
- 8. Photo Credit: Thomas Hawk Quantitative Usage
- 9. 119,238 109,514 122,085 77,046 84,117 70,188 2011 2012 2013 Searches Scopus Web of Science 41,621 37,871 39,318 13,924 22,328 16,572 2011 2012 2013 Sessions Scopus Web of Science
- 10. Scopus Analysis Usage by UConn Users: 2010 - 2013 21,098 25,755 28,524 37,149 2010 2011 2012 2013
- 11. Advanced Search 3,928, 2% Analyze 127, 0% Author Search 2,255, 1% Citation Report 7,941, 5% Cited Reference 9,151, 6% Citing Articles 7,440, 5% Combine Searches 763, 0% General Search 110,448, 69% Marked List 1,374, 1% Refine 17,299, 11% Related Records 192, 0% Saved Searches 216, 0% Web of Science Usage by Usage Type: 9/2013 – 7/2014 27,677 or 17% of usage was for value-added analysis use.
- 12. 37,149 35,885 122,085 70,188 Scopus Web of Science Analysis Feature Use COUNTER Searches Analysis Feature and Counter Search Use [calculated to estimate 2013 calendar year analysis usage for WoS] Scopus Web of Science
- 13. Storrs/Regionals: Referring Source 2012-2013 Number of Requests Summon 335,478 PubMed 203,832 Google (Google & Google Scholar) 132,880 Scopus 81,576 Web of Science 59,610 Health: Referring Source 2013 Number of Requests Scopus 9,651 SciVerse 8,230 Web of Science 3,593 Google 438 Open URL Referring Source: From where did users click to access full text?
- 14. Faculty Graduate Student Undergraduate Faculty Graduate Student Undergraduate Faculty Graduate Student Undergraduate Faculty Graduate Student Undergraduate 2010 2011 2012 2013 Scopus Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar Interlibrary Loan Requests by Citation Source and Status: January 1, 2012 – December 31, 2013
- 15. Off-Campus Logins to Web of Science and Scopus by Status: January 1 – December 31, 2013
- 16. Department Scopus Web of Science % Difference Materials Science 22 27 20% Psychology 19 37 64% Expired 15 15 0% Social Work 14 4 111% Marine Sciences 13 15 14% UConn CEP 13 11 17% Nursing 12 3 120% Molecular & Cell Biology 11 12 9% Ecology & Evolutionary Biology 11 36 106% Mechanical Engineering 11 8 32% Library 11 9 20% Pharmacy 10 6 50% Chemistry 10 22 75% Educational Psychology 6 11 59% Physics 4 11 93% Chemical & Bimolecular Engineering 6 10 50% 188 237 Off-Campus Logins to Web of Science and Scopus by Department Affiliation of User: January 1 – December 31, 2013
- 17. Qualitative Usage Photo Credit: Kiuko
- 18. 51% 67% 28% 41% 45% 35% 29% 18% Faculty Graduate Google Scholar Scopus WoS Other Primary Faculty and Graduate Student Self-Reported Use of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science [189 People from 22 Departments]
- 19. “We do not use Scopus at all -- probably for historical reasons, since as long as I can remember I have always dealt with WoS and was happy enough not to look for any alternatives.” “We have a VERY HEAVY USE of SCOPUS – not so much of Web of Science or Google Scholar.” “I use Google Scholar and Scopus the most.” “I've used Scopus when editors have provided me free access when I have served as a reviewer. I was not aware Scopus was directly available at UConn.” “Does the university have scopus and web of science access? I would like to use those too, but I don’t have a subscription.” Faculty and Graduate Student Self-Reported Use of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science [189 People from 22 Departments]
- 20. “No serious researcher can survive without access to Web of Science” “I’ve used web of science for many years and that is what I’m most used to. But I don’t see much difference between these services.” “I have longstanding Scopus email alerts and have just never rolled these over into anything else.” “I also admit that it is ignorance of the other available tools that drives my use of Google scholar.” “I do not use any of these three mostly because I am not familiar with them.” Faculty and Graduate Student Self-Reported Use of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science [189 People from 22 Departments]
- 21. Photo Credit: Historias Visuales Historic & Future Cost
- 22. $- $2.00 $4.00 $6.00 $8.00 $10.00 $12.00 $14.00 Cost Per Search Cost Per Session Cost Per Search Cost Per Session Cost Per Search Cost Per Session FY12 FY13 FY14 Scopus Web of Science Cost Per Search and Cost Per Session for FY12, FY13, and FY14 Scopus Web of Science
- 23. $- $1.00 $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 $7.00 Scopus Web of Science Cost Per Search for Analysis Features for FY14 Scopus Web of Science
- 24. Top Five Subscription Fees for FY 14 Elsevier ScienceDirect E-Journals and Serial Monographs Wiley E-Journals Springer E-Journals Thomson Reuters Web of Science Sage E-Journals Full text Full text Full text NO full text Full text
- 25. Decisions Photo Credit: Daniel Oines
- 26. What Happened Next Photo Credit: Spyros Papaspyropoulos
- 27. From: Science at Thomson Reuters <Science@info.science.thomsonreuters.biz> Reply-To: Science at Thomson Reuters <Science.reply@thomsonreuters.com> Date: Thursday, August 7, 2014 at 10:35 AM To: Gregory Colati <Gregory.Colati@lib.uconn.edu> Subject: Discontinuation of Web of Science access
- 28. Photo credit: Keith Kissel Reactions
- 29. Photo credit: splorp Hindsight & Looking Forward
- 30. Decline in state funding for US institutions of higher education. http://ctmirror.org/2015/06/29/the-state-of-uconn-in-15-charts/#
- 31. 14% Reduction in Funds Allocated to Library Collections
- 32. Comprehensive Review Process & Data Objectives 1. Identify cancellations of journals and databases to address projected shortfalls in FY2017. 2. Initiate an annual process for reviewing subscribed collections. E-Resource Terms & Definitions Journal Package Guide 2015 Journal Title Lists* *Including title, usage, cost per use, entitlement holdings, list price, projected ILL cost if unsubscribed, etc.
- 33. Photo credit: Sean MacEntee
- 34. Photo credit:Photo credit: maveric2003
- 35. “You have to pay $40 per article....What would be a lot better is if we were able to have all of these [articles]…we could have this great innovation, but these paywalls are stopping us.” - Jack Andraka http://www.sparc.arl.org/news/16-year-old-touts-role-open-access-breakthrough-cancer-diagnostic-interview-jack-andraka-dr
- 36. The RSA Executive Committee regrets to announce that ProQuest has canceled our subscription to the Early English Books Online database (EEBO). The basis for the cancellation is that our members make such heavy use of the subscription, this is reducing ProQuest's potential revenue from library-based subscriptions. http://www.rsa.org/news/257604/RSA-EEBO-subscription-has-been-canceled.htm
- 38. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/resignations-threat-over-taylor-and-francis-censorship/2013752.article “A journal’s editorial board has been left on the brink of resignation after an eight-month standoff with its publisher Taylor & Francis over the publication of a debate on academic publishing and the profits made by major firms.”
- 40. http://www.ohchr.org/en/udhr/pages/introduction.aspx United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 19 “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”