SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 40
   Speaker: Ryan P. Giolitto, CPA, CFP®
    ◦ Ryan is a tax manager at CDH with several years of
      experience in working with a variety of businesses
      of all sizes. His area of specialty includes financial
      planning and tax planning for businesses and high
      net worth individuals, including business owners.


   Phone Contact: 630-285-0215 x8214

   Email Contact: rgiolitto@cdhcpa.com
   Basic Principles of State Income Tax
   Calculation of Apportionment Factors
   General Nexus Principles
   History of Nexus
   Types of Nexus
   Future of Nexus
   Compliance Suggestions
   Planning Suggestions
   Federal taxable income is modified for state
    adjustments and multiplied by a state
    apportionment factor to determine state
    taxable income

Federal taxable income
+ State modifications
State modified taxable income
x apportionment factor
State taxable income
   State modifications result from differences in
    federal vs. state law
   Common modifications in adjusting federal
    taxable income to state taxable income are as
    follows:
    ◦ Bonus depreciation
    ◦ State taxes
    ◦ Other items
   State apportionment factors determine the
    portion of federal taxable income that will be
    taxed by each state
   State apportionment factors refer to the
    combination of 3 individual apportionment
    factors weighted differently by each state
   Each factor is composed of a numerator (total
    within state) and denominator (total
    everywhere)
   The 3 individual apportionment factors are as
    follows:
    ◦ Payroll
    ◦ Property
    ◦ Sales

   These factors are weighted differently by
    each state, with the following weightings
    being most common:
    ◦ One factor sales
    ◦ Three factor
    ◦ Three factor with double weighted sales
   Payroll Factor includes:
    ◦ Officer’s compensation
    ◦ Wages related to cost of sales
    ◦ Operating/administrative wages


   Payroll Factor does not include:
    ◦ Independent contractor payments
    ◦ Management fees
   Property Factor includes:
    ◦ Original cost of owned property (most states)
    ◦ Net book value of owned property (few states)
    ◦ Rented property x 8 (most states)

   Property Factor does not include:
    ◦ Construction in progress
   Sales Factor includes:
    ◦   Gross Receipts
    ◦   Interest (most states)
    ◦   Dividends (most states)
    ◦   Gains from sales of property (most states)
   Sales factor is based on several approaches
    depending on the state:
    ◦ Destination of end user
    ◦ Where services performed (income-producing
      activity or cost of performance sourcing)
    ◦ Defined by state law (market based sourcing based
      on where market for services really exists)
   Throwback – requires “throwing back” sales
    sourced to a state in which the taxpayer is not
    taxable to the taxpayer’s home state for
    inclusion in the sales apportionment numerator
   Throw-out – requires “removal” of sales sourced
    to a state in which the taxpayer is not taxable
    from the sales apportionment denominator
   Most states have a throwback rule
   Very few states have a throw-out rule, including
    New Jersey and West Virginia
Most     Some States   Few States
                     States
Airlines                 X
Athletics                                        X
Broadcasting                       X
Construction                       X
Financial                X
Manufacturing                                    X
Motor Carriers           X
Pipelines                          X
Publishing                                       X
Railroads                X
Shipping                           X
Telecommunications                               X
Utilities                                        X
   Definition of Nexus – sufficient/substantial
    connection
   Sales Tax/Income Tax Nexus applied
    different standards
   This class focuses on Income Tax Nexus only
   Payroll
    ◦ Defer to filed payroll tax returns
   Property
    ◦ Defer to records of property location
   Sales
    ◦ Subjective, based on determination of end user
      location, cost of performance/income producing
      activity location, or market source location
    ◦ But are we really required to file and pay in all these
      locations? Maybe not.
   PL 86-272 – Interstate Income Act of 1959
    ◦ Limits ability of states to tax interstate commerce
    ◦ Limits nexus for mere solicitation of orders in a
      state if the orders are filled or approved out of the
      state
    ◦ Only limits income tax nexus (not franchise tax
      nexus)
    ◦ Only applies to sales of tangible property (does not
      apply to service companies)
    ◦ Only covers solicitation in state (other activities may
      disqualify, sales orders must be approved out of
      state)
   Several states have enacted taxes not based on
    income, which are not subject to protection by
    P.L. 86-272 and could cause substantial tax
    burden
   These taxes are known as franchise or gross
    receipts based taxes, which exist in the following
    states:
    ◦ Michigan (Single Business Tax/Michigan Business Tax
      changed to Corporate Income Tax, no longer receipts
      based)
    ◦ Ohio (Commercial Activity Tax)
    ◦ Texas (Margin Tax)
    ◦ Washington (Business & Occupation Tax)
   Traditionally required physical presence
    ◦ Quill Corp vs. North Dakota
    ◦ National Bellas Hess vs. Department of Revenue
   Now changing to focus more on true
    economics of transactions
   Physical Presence
    ◦ Requires Traditional Presence
   Economic Nexus
    ◦ Based on Facts/Circumstances
   Factor-Based Nexus
    ◦ Based on Exceeding Set Thresholds
   Nexus based on physical presence is
    triggered upon entering the state physically
    for a period of time
   Some states have defined de-minimus
    physical presence rules, while others have not
   Since P.L. 86-272 was enacted to cover only
    solicitation of sales situations, any amount of
    physical presence, although limited, will most
    likely trigger income tax nexus
   The following activities may create income
    tax nexus in various states:
    ◦ Occasional training seminars for customers
    ◦ Occasional business meetings
    ◦ Occasional attendance at technical/training
      seminars sponsored by unrelated parties
    ◦ Occasional board of director’s meetings
    ◦ Solicitation of sales
    ◦ Attendance at trade shows for less than 14 days per
      year
◦   Providing company car for salesperson
◦   Inventory inspection by salesperson
◦   Sale of real estate
◦   Setup of promotional items by salesperson
◦   Maintenance of a security interest in property sold
    until contract price has been paid
   The following activities may create income
    tax nexus in various states:
    ◦ Employees repairing and maintaining products
    ◦ Maintaining telephone answering service
    ◦ Leasing employees to another company
    ◦ Non-salesperson employee working from home
    ◦ Employees providing in state consulting services
    ◦ Having a website in and/or located on a server in a
      state
    ◦ Employee presence for less than 20 days to
      purchase goods from vendors
◦ Employees inspecting customer installations of
  products
◦ Company listing in phone book
◦ Providing engineering or design functions related to
  sales of customized products
◦ Hiring unrelated parties to repossess property
◦ Hiring unrelated parties to install products
◦ Holding inventory at fulfillment company
◦ Hiring unrelated parties to collect accounts
◦ Hiring unrelated parties for warranty repair
   In response to the flexibility of P.L. 86-272
    with regard to physical presence, most states
    have responded by enacting economic nexus
    provisions
   Economic nexus is a subjective concept
    focused on determining whether the company
    is “doing business” in a state
   Enforcement has been unsuccessful to some
    degree, so the states have increased
    enforcement and some have passed factor-
    based nexus laws
   The following states have enacted factor-based
    nexus standards with the following thresholds:

   California/Colorado/Ohio
    ◦ Property $50,000
    ◦ Payroll $50,000
    ◦ Sales $500,000
   Connecticut
    ◦ Sales $500,000
   Virginia
    ◦ Any apportionment factor is positive
   States are moving away from traditional
    nexus rules in the following ways:
    ◦ 3 factor apportionment is switching to single factor
      sales apportionment or double weighted sales
      apportionment to capture lost revenue from
      increasing move toward decreased physical
      presence
    ◦ Nexus rules changing from based on physical
      presence or economic nexus to factor-based nexus
    ◦ Enforcement of economic nexus is increasing
   Evaluating nexus for a pure ecommerce
    company is challenging. The following
    factors are used to determine nexus risk for
    these types of businesses:
    ◦   Internet/Telecommunications provider location
    ◦   Server location (for website and other data)
    ◦   Location of intangible property
    ◦   Location and significance of customers
    ◦   Physical location of affiliate
    ◦   Location of advertising/telephone listing
    ◦   Location of product repairs/support assistance
   Filing related returns will most likely result in
    a state income tax reporting requirement
   Therefore, be aware of where you file the
    following to address nexus exposure:
    ◦   Company registrations
    ◦   Annual reports
    ◦   Sales tax returns
    ◦   Withholding tax returns
    ◦   Payroll tax returns
    ◦   Property tax returns
   States often send nexus questionnaires to
    taxpayers they suspect of having unreported
    activity
   It is acceptable to prepare your own
    responses to a nexus questionnaire
   However, make sure to seek a review of your
    responses by a state tax expert prior to
    submitting to state taxing authorities
   Voluntary Disclosure programs are available
    in virtually all states to report unreported
    state tax filings prior to receiving a notice
    from a state taxing authority
   Voluntary Disclosure often guarantees a
    shorter look back period for unfiled returns
    and ability to ask for abatement of penalties
    due to reasonable cause
   Amnesty programs offer the ability to file
    unfiled state tax returns without any penalty
    charges
   These programs are often opened and closed
    quickly, so it is important to be on the
    lookout for specific states where risk exists
   Kentucky – Through June 30, 2013
   Ohio – Through May 1, 2013
   Rhode Island – Through November 15, 2012
   If none of the previously suggested courses
    of action are possible, you may be forced to
    file a state tax return by a state taxing
    authority
   In this event, attempt to negotiate look back
    periods and penalties to the highest extent
    possible
   Some states will allow a 3 year look back
    period and will abate penalties in certain
    circumstances
1.   Identify states with potential nexus
2.   Discover state nexus rules, apportionment
     factors, and tax rates
3.   Develop and implement plan for moving
     nexus and apportionment factors to states
     with lower tax rates
   If a large apportionment fraction is desired in
    a low tax state, consider forming a separate
    company to hold that state’s activity (if
    profitable)
   If avoiding overall company exposure to a
    state with a gross receipts based tax is
    desirable, consider forming a separate
    company to be exposed to the gross receipts
    tax on its own
   Be aware of consolidated reporting rules
   State modified taxable income may not be
    flexible so focus planning efforts on changing
    apportionment factors
   Make necessary adjustments to source items
    to low tax states while keeping
    apportionment factors low in high tax states
   If state tax exposure is significant, consider
    CDH nexus study to identify risk and
    recommend strategies for improvement
   Nexus study can be customized in scope of
    states and can include both income and sales
    tax if necessary
   State nexus is a very complicated topic due to
    varying state law
   With proper planning, state taxes can be
    minimized
   It is important to stay current on state tax
    risk and exposure to maximize company
    profits
   Thank you for your attendance
   Please complete the course evaluation
    worksheets

More Related Content

Similar to State Income Tax Nexus

SALT & Federal and State R&D Updates
SALT & Federal and State R&D Updates SALT & Federal and State R&D Updates
SALT & Federal and State R&D Updates Robert O'Neill
 
State and Local Tax Nexus Issues and the Impact on Mergers and Acquisitions
State and Local Tax Nexus Issues and the Impact on Mergers and AcquisitionsState and Local Tax Nexus Issues and the Impact on Mergers and Acquisitions
State and Local Tax Nexus Issues and the Impact on Mergers and AcquisitionsSkoda Minotti
 
Kamal Adeni - Nuts and Bolts Of Sales Tax
Kamal Adeni - Nuts and Bolts Of  Sales TaxKamal Adeni - Nuts and Bolts Of  Sales Tax
Kamal Adeni - Nuts and Bolts Of Sales TaxKAMAL ADENI
 
ED411 | 2017 | Track 1: The Site Selection Short List
ED411 | 2017 | Track 1: The Site Selection Short ListED411 | 2017 | Track 1: The Site Selection Short List
ED411 | 2017 | Track 1: The Site Selection Short ListOne Columbus
 
The Importance of State and Local Tax Nexus
The Importance of State and Local Tax NexusThe Importance of State and Local Tax Nexus
The Importance of State and Local Tax NexusSkoda Minotti
 
What Is Life After Coronavirus? State and Local Tax: First Wave Response & Se...
What Is Life After Coronavirus? State and Local Tax: First Wave Response & Se...What Is Life After Coronavirus? State and Local Tax: First Wave Response & Se...
What Is Life After Coronavirus? State and Local Tax: First Wave Response & Se...Rea & Associates
 
Presentation- Cross Border tax
Presentation- Cross Border taxPresentation- Cross Border tax
Presentation- Cross Border taxAlpesh Joshi
 
2015 State & Local Tax Update
2015 State & Local Tax Update2015 State & Local Tax Update
2015 State & Local Tax UpdateCBIZ, Inc.
 
International taxation and transfer pricing for transfer pricing
International taxation and transfer pricing for transfer pricing International taxation and transfer pricing for transfer pricing
International taxation and transfer pricing for transfer pricing ssuser47f0be
 
Think Your Sales to Government Are Exempt from Sales Tax? You May Need to Thi...
Think Your Sales to Government Are Exempt from Sales Tax? You May Need to Thi...Think Your Sales to Government Are Exempt from Sales Tax? You May Need to Thi...
Think Your Sales to Government Are Exempt from Sales Tax? You May Need to Thi...Winvale
 
How to Clean up Sales Tax for 2020- Amazon Reporting Hacks & Marketplace Faci...
How to Clean up Sales Tax for 2020- Amazon Reporting Hacks & Marketplace Faci...How to Clean up Sales Tax for 2020- Amazon Reporting Hacks & Marketplace Faci...
How to Clean up Sales Tax for 2020- Amazon Reporting Hacks & Marketplace Faci...Tinuiti
 
Tax Audits Practice Process 042611 Webinar Final Sbjzbl042511 (2)
Tax Audits Practice  Process 042611 Webinar Final Sbjzbl042511 (2)Tax Audits Practice  Process 042611 Webinar Final Sbjzbl042511 (2)
Tax Audits Practice Process 042611 Webinar Final Sbjzbl042511 (2)jonzefi
 
Base Erosion and Profit Shifting
Base Erosion and Profit ShiftingBase Erosion and Profit Shifting
Base Erosion and Profit ShiftingBharath Rao
 
The Wayfair Decision and Your Business
The Wayfair Decision and Your BusinessThe Wayfair Decision and Your Business
The Wayfair Decision and Your BusinessJonWellington3
 
Doing Business in United States - Part II
Doing Business in United States - Part IIDoing Business in United States - Part II
Doing Business in United States - Part IIDVSResearchFoundatio
 
Lykes Excelleration Surety 7 22 09
Lykes Excelleration Surety 7 22 09Lykes Excelleration Surety 7 22 09
Lykes Excelleration Surety 7 22 09jreedcpa
 
Lykes Excelleration Surety 7 22 09
Lykes Excelleration Surety 7 22 09Lykes Excelleration Surety 7 22 09
Lykes Excelleration Surety 7 22 09guesta660bed7
 

Similar to State Income Tax Nexus (20)

SALT & Federal and State R&D Updates
SALT & Federal and State R&D Updates SALT & Federal and State R&D Updates
SALT & Federal and State R&D Updates
 
State and Local Tax Nexus Issues and the Impact on Mergers and Acquisitions
State and Local Tax Nexus Issues and the Impact on Mergers and AcquisitionsState and Local Tax Nexus Issues and the Impact on Mergers and Acquisitions
State and Local Tax Nexus Issues and the Impact on Mergers and Acquisitions
 
Kamal Adeni - Nuts and Bolts Of Sales Tax
Kamal Adeni - Nuts and Bolts Of  Sales TaxKamal Adeni - Nuts and Bolts Of  Sales Tax
Kamal Adeni - Nuts and Bolts Of Sales Tax
 
ED411 | 2017 | Track 1: The Site Selection Short List
ED411 | 2017 | Track 1: The Site Selection Short ListED411 | 2017 | Track 1: The Site Selection Short List
ED411 | 2017 | Track 1: The Site Selection Short List
 
The Importance of State and Local Tax Nexus
The Importance of State and Local Tax NexusThe Importance of State and Local Tax Nexus
The Importance of State and Local Tax Nexus
 
Hot Topics in State Taxes
Hot Topics in State TaxesHot Topics in State Taxes
Hot Topics in State Taxes
 
What Is Life After Coronavirus? State and Local Tax: First Wave Response & Se...
What Is Life After Coronavirus? State and Local Tax: First Wave Response & Se...What Is Life After Coronavirus? State and Local Tax: First Wave Response & Se...
What Is Life After Coronavirus? State and Local Tax: First Wave Response & Se...
 
Presentation
PresentationPresentation
Presentation
 
Presentation- Cross Border tax
Presentation- Cross Border taxPresentation- Cross Border tax
Presentation- Cross Border tax
 
United States Sales Tax
United States Sales TaxUnited States Sales Tax
United States Sales Tax
 
2015 State & Local Tax Update
2015 State & Local Tax Update2015 State & Local Tax Update
2015 State & Local Tax Update
 
International taxation and transfer pricing for transfer pricing
International taxation and transfer pricing for transfer pricing International taxation and transfer pricing for transfer pricing
International taxation and transfer pricing for transfer pricing
 
Think Your Sales to Government Are Exempt from Sales Tax? You May Need to Thi...
Think Your Sales to Government Are Exempt from Sales Tax? You May Need to Thi...Think Your Sales to Government Are Exempt from Sales Tax? You May Need to Thi...
Think Your Sales to Government Are Exempt from Sales Tax? You May Need to Thi...
 
How to Clean up Sales Tax for 2020- Amazon Reporting Hacks & Marketplace Faci...
How to Clean up Sales Tax for 2020- Amazon Reporting Hacks & Marketplace Faci...How to Clean up Sales Tax for 2020- Amazon Reporting Hacks & Marketplace Faci...
How to Clean up Sales Tax for 2020- Amazon Reporting Hacks & Marketplace Faci...
 
Tax Audits Practice Process 042611 Webinar Final Sbjzbl042511 (2)
Tax Audits Practice  Process 042611 Webinar Final Sbjzbl042511 (2)Tax Audits Practice  Process 042611 Webinar Final Sbjzbl042511 (2)
Tax Audits Practice Process 042611 Webinar Final Sbjzbl042511 (2)
 
Base Erosion and Profit Shifting
Base Erosion and Profit ShiftingBase Erosion and Profit Shifting
Base Erosion and Profit Shifting
 
The Wayfair Decision and Your Business
The Wayfair Decision and Your BusinessThe Wayfair Decision and Your Business
The Wayfair Decision and Your Business
 
Doing Business in United States - Part II
Doing Business in United States - Part IIDoing Business in United States - Part II
Doing Business in United States - Part II
 
Lykes Excelleration Surety 7 22 09
Lykes Excelleration Surety 7 22 09Lykes Excelleration Surety 7 22 09
Lykes Excelleration Surety 7 22 09
 
Lykes Excelleration Surety 7 22 09
Lykes Excelleration Surety 7 22 09Lykes Excelleration Surety 7 22 09
Lykes Excelleration Surety 7 22 09
 

State Income Tax Nexus

  • 1.
  • 2. Speaker: Ryan P. Giolitto, CPA, CFP® ◦ Ryan is a tax manager at CDH with several years of experience in working with a variety of businesses of all sizes. His area of specialty includes financial planning and tax planning for businesses and high net worth individuals, including business owners.  Phone Contact: 630-285-0215 x8214  Email Contact: rgiolitto@cdhcpa.com
  • 3. Basic Principles of State Income Tax  Calculation of Apportionment Factors  General Nexus Principles  History of Nexus  Types of Nexus  Future of Nexus  Compliance Suggestions  Planning Suggestions
  • 4. Federal taxable income is modified for state adjustments and multiplied by a state apportionment factor to determine state taxable income Federal taxable income + State modifications State modified taxable income x apportionment factor State taxable income
  • 5. State modifications result from differences in federal vs. state law  Common modifications in adjusting federal taxable income to state taxable income are as follows: ◦ Bonus depreciation ◦ State taxes ◦ Other items
  • 6. State apportionment factors determine the portion of federal taxable income that will be taxed by each state  State apportionment factors refer to the combination of 3 individual apportionment factors weighted differently by each state  Each factor is composed of a numerator (total within state) and denominator (total everywhere)
  • 7. The 3 individual apportionment factors are as follows: ◦ Payroll ◦ Property ◦ Sales  These factors are weighted differently by each state, with the following weightings being most common: ◦ One factor sales ◦ Three factor ◦ Three factor with double weighted sales
  • 8. Payroll Factor includes: ◦ Officer’s compensation ◦ Wages related to cost of sales ◦ Operating/administrative wages  Payroll Factor does not include: ◦ Independent contractor payments ◦ Management fees
  • 9. Property Factor includes: ◦ Original cost of owned property (most states) ◦ Net book value of owned property (few states) ◦ Rented property x 8 (most states)  Property Factor does not include: ◦ Construction in progress
  • 10. Sales Factor includes: ◦ Gross Receipts ◦ Interest (most states) ◦ Dividends (most states) ◦ Gains from sales of property (most states)
  • 11. Sales factor is based on several approaches depending on the state: ◦ Destination of end user ◦ Where services performed (income-producing activity or cost of performance sourcing) ◦ Defined by state law (market based sourcing based on where market for services really exists)
  • 12. Throwback – requires “throwing back” sales sourced to a state in which the taxpayer is not taxable to the taxpayer’s home state for inclusion in the sales apportionment numerator  Throw-out – requires “removal” of sales sourced to a state in which the taxpayer is not taxable from the sales apportionment denominator  Most states have a throwback rule  Very few states have a throw-out rule, including New Jersey and West Virginia
  • 13. Most Some States Few States States Airlines X Athletics X Broadcasting X Construction X Financial X Manufacturing X Motor Carriers X Pipelines X Publishing X Railroads X Shipping X Telecommunications X Utilities X
  • 14. Definition of Nexus – sufficient/substantial connection  Sales Tax/Income Tax Nexus applied different standards  This class focuses on Income Tax Nexus only
  • 15. Payroll ◦ Defer to filed payroll tax returns  Property ◦ Defer to records of property location  Sales ◦ Subjective, based on determination of end user location, cost of performance/income producing activity location, or market source location ◦ But are we really required to file and pay in all these locations? Maybe not.
  • 16. PL 86-272 – Interstate Income Act of 1959 ◦ Limits ability of states to tax interstate commerce ◦ Limits nexus for mere solicitation of orders in a state if the orders are filled or approved out of the state ◦ Only limits income tax nexus (not franchise tax nexus) ◦ Only applies to sales of tangible property (does not apply to service companies) ◦ Only covers solicitation in state (other activities may disqualify, sales orders must be approved out of state)
  • 17. Several states have enacted taxes not based on income, which are not subject to protection by P.L. 86-272 and could cause substantial tax burden  These taxes are known as franchise or gross receipts based taxes, which exist in the following states: ◦ Michigan (Single Business Tax/Michigan Business Tax changed to Corporate Income Tax, no longer receipts based) ◦ Ohio (Commercial Activity Tax) ◦ Texas (Margin Tax) ◦ Washington (Business & Occupation Tax)
  • 18. Traditionally required physical presence ◦ Quill Corp vs. North Dakota ◦ National Bellas Hess vs. Department of Revenue  Now changing to focus more on true economics of transactions
  • 19. Physical Presence ◦ Requires Traditional Presence  Economic Nexus ◦ Based on Facts/Circumstances  Factor-Based Nexus ◦ Based on Exceeding Set Thresholds
  • 20. Nexus based on physical presence is triggered upon entering the state physically for a period of time  Some states have defined de-minimus physical presence rules, while others have not  Since P.L. 86-272 was enacted to cover only solicitation of sales situations, any amount of physical presence, although limited, will most likely trigger income tax nexus
  • 21. The following activities may create income tax nexus in various states: ◦ Occasional training seminars for customers ◦ Occasional business meetings ◦ Occasional attendance at technical/training seminars sponsored by unrelated parties ◦ Occasional board of director’s meetings ◦ Solicitation of sales ◦ Attendance at trade shows for less than 14 days per year
  • 22. Providing company car for salesperson ◦ Inventory inspection by salesperson ◦ Sale of real estate ◦ Setup of promotional items by salesperson ◦ Maintenance of a security interest in property sold until contract price has been paid
  • 23. The following activities may create income tax nexus in various states: ◦ Employees repairing and maintaining products ◦ Maintaining telephone answering service ◦ Leasing employees to another company ◦ Non-salesperson employee working from home ◦ Employees providing in state consulting services ◦ Having a website in and/or located on a server in a state ◦ Employee presence for less than 20 days to purchase goods from vendors
  • 24. ◦ Employees inspecting customer installations of products ◦ Company listing in phone book ◦ Providing engineering or design functions related to sales of customized products ◦ Hiring unrelated parties to repossess property ◦ Hiring unrelated parties to install products ◦ Holding inventory at fulfillment company ◦ Hiring unrelated parties to collect accounts ◦ Hiring unrelated parties for warranty repair
  • 25. In response to the flexibility of P.L. 86-272 with regard to physical presence, most states have responded by enacting economic nexus provisions  Economic nexus is a subjective concept focused on determining whether the company is “doing business” in a state  Enforcement has been unsuccessful to some degree, so the states have increased enforcement and some have passed factor- based nexus laws
  • 26. The following states have enacted factor-based nexus standards with the following thresholds:  California/Colorado/Ohio ◦ Property $50,000 ◦ Payroll $50,000 ◦ Sales $500,000  Connecticut ◦ Sales $500,000  Virginia ◦ Any apportionment factor is positive
  • 27. States are moving away from traditional nexus rules in the following ways: ◦ 3 factor apportionment is switching to single factor sales apportionment or double weighted sales apportionment to capture lost revenue from increasing move toward decreased physical presence ◦ Nexus rules changing from based on physical presence or economic nexus to factor-based nexus ◦ Enforcement of economic nexus is increasing
  • 28. Evaluating nexus for a pure ecommerce company is challenging. The following factors are used to determine nexus risk for these types of businesses: ◦ Internet/Telecommunications provider location ◦ Server location (for website and other data) ◦ Location of intangible property ◦ Location and significance of customers ◦ Physical location of affiliate ◦ Location of advertising/telephone listing ◦ Location of product repairs/support assistance
  • 29. Filing related returns will most likely result in a state income tax reporting requirement  Therefore, be aware of where you file the following to address nexus exposure: ◦ Company registrations ◦ Annual reports ◦ Sales tax returns ◦ Withholding tax returns ◦ Payroll tax returns ◦ Property tax returns
  • 30. States often send nexus questionnaires to taxpayers they suspect of having unreported activity  It is acceptable to prepare your own responses to a nexus questionnaire  However, make sure to seek a review of your responses by a state tax expert prior to submitting to state taxing authorities
  • 31. Voluntary Disclosure programs are available in virtually all states to report unreported state tax filings prior to receiving a notice from a state taxing authority  Voluntary Disclosure often guarantees a shorter look back period for unfiled returns and ability to ask for abatement of penalties due to reasonable cause
  • 32. Amnesty programs offer the ability to file unfiled state tax returns without any penalty charges  These programs are often opened and closed quickly, so it is important to be on the lookout for specific states where risk exists
  • 33. Kentucky – Through June 30, 2013  Ohio – Through May 1, 2013  Rhode Island – Through November 15, 2012
  • 34. If none of the previously suggested courses of action are possible, you may be forced to file a state tax return by a state taxing authority  In this event, attempt to negotiate look back periods and penalties to the highest extent possible  Some states will allow a 3 year look back period and will abate penalties in certain circumstances
  • 35. 1. Identify states with potential nexus 2. Discover state nexus rules, apportionment factors, and tax rates 3. Develop and implement plan for moving nexus and apportionment factors to states with lower tax rates
  • 36. If a large apportionment fraction is desired in a low tax state, consider forming a separate company to hold that state’s activity (if profitable)  If avoiding overall company exposure to a state with a gross receipts based tax is desirable, consider forming a separate company to be exposed to the gross receipts tax on its own  Be aware of consolidated reporting rules
  • 37. State modified taxable income may not be flexible so focus planning efforts on changing apportionment factors  Make necessary adjustments to source items to low tax states while keeping apportionment factors low in high tax states
  • 38. If state tax exposure is significant, consider CDH nexus study to identify risk and recommend strategies for improvement  Nexus study can be customized in scope of states and can include both income and sales tax if necessary
  • 39. State nexus is a very complicated topic due to varying state law  With proper planning, state taxes can be minimized  It is important to stay current on state tax risk and exposure to maximize company profits
  • 40. Thank you for your attendance  Please complete the course evaluation worksheets