SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 19
Download to read offline
Trends and challenges in the emerging
     private, philanthropic and statutory
  funding environments for the third sector




                           Cathy Pharoah
                     Professor of Charity Funding
Co-Director, ESRC Research Centre for Charitable Giving and Philanthropy
                        Cass Business School
The funding environment

•   third sector – increasingly open and contested space – how is this
    playing out from the perspective of its funding?

•   increasingly multi-stakeholder funding environment –
    local and national government, other state agencies, quangos,
    lenders, companies, venture and major philanthropists, users,
    activists

•   different/ competing agendas, expectations, roles


•   what are funding trends and sector dependencies?

•   adding value, transformational power, re-engineering, co-option?
The framing of today’s third sector – open season?
Charities
170,000, 1000 new (or transfers) per year, income £46 bn

Social enterprises
55,000, turnover £27 bn, 5% of all businesses with employees, 1% of GDP;
700 Community Interest Companies since 05, mainly CLG, range of business

Partnerships
5,500 local hybrids, Sure Start/Connexions/Neighbourhood Renewal (£4 bn)

Quangos and agencies
Independent Living Fund, British Educational Communications and Technology
Agency, Skills for Care, Skills for Care, the Specialist Schools and Academies Trust (£3bn)

Community organisations
5- 900,000, property assets/ transfers eg village halls/community centres/historic buildings

Civil society
865,000 organisations, total income £109 billion
Shape of charitable expenditure today
 1 Cancer Research UK                                31-Mar-07   553.2
 2 The British Council                               31-Mar-07   545.7
 3 Nuffield Hospitals                                31-Dec-06   478.7
 4 The Wellcome Trust                                31-Mar-07   468.9
   International Finance Facility for Immunisation
 5 Company                                           31-Dec-06   441.8
 6 The National Trust                                28-Feb-07   312.8
 7 Oxfam                                             30-Apr-07   297.2
 8 CITB-ConstructionSkills                           31-Dec-06   250.4
 9 Anchor Trust                                      31-Mar-07   241.2
10 NCH                                               31-Mar-07   214.0
11 Church Commissioners for England                  31-Dec-06   201.2
12 The British Red Cross Society                     31-Dec-06   200.9
13 Barnardo's                                        31-Mar-07   195.6
14 Royal Mencap Society                              31-Mar-07   172.1
15 British Heart Foundation                          31-Mar-07   167.2
Third Sector’s Funding dependencies
        Individuals                                                    9,500

      Investments                                          7,000

        Stat grants                                   6,000

           Stat fees                   2,500

           Legacies                1,600

Lottery (non-BLF)              1,300

Trusts (med, aca)             1,200

Trusts (gen, BLF)             1,100

       Companies             1,000

 Social investors            790

                £m       0     2,000       4,000   6,000      8,000   10,000

  Date Arial Bold 10pt
Shape of third sector funding today


                       companies   other
      social investors    2%               govt grants
                                    9%
             3%                               10%

     trusts                                                    govt fees
       6%                                                        23%




people (dead)
     6%                                                  lottery
                  people (live)                            5%
                     36%
State funding by sub-sector – top charities
% of funding from state
 70                                                                                 59
 60                                                                          51
                                                          46      48
 50
 40                                           34    34
                24     25        25     28
 30     19
 20
 10
  0




                                                                                     S
                                                                   h




                                                                                    D
                                er
           es




                                                                 ut
                                                       y
                                                      n




                                                                            re


                                                                                  AI
            t




                                                    le


                                                      l


                                                   lit
                            nc


                            lth


                                                  re
         en




                                                  na




                                                               yo
         ic




                                                                          fa
                                                op




                                                 bi
                                               ild
                          ca


                         ea
       sp
      nm




                                              io




                                                                        el
                                             sa
                                            pe
                                            ch




                                            at




                                                                       w
     ho




                       lh




                                           di
    ro




                                          rn




                                                                   al
                                          d
                     ta
  vi




                                        in


                                       te




                                                                 ci
                   en
en




                                     bl


                                     in




                                                               so
                  m




                            who is the major shareholder?
                                       what is the right shareholding?
                                              what does the public think?
Top service-providing charities by % statutory funds
   1   NCH                                                  31-Mar-07   193.5   88.9
   2   Royal Mencap Society                                 31-Mar-07   150.9   84.9
   3   Leonard Cheshire Disability                          31-Mar-07   130.6   89.5
   4   Barnardo's                                           31-Mar-07   111.1   57.9
   5   National Autistic Society [The]                      31-Mar-07    62.9   84.6
   6   Sense - National Deafblind and Rubella Association   31-Mar-07    51.6   74.3
   7   Turning Point                                        31-Mar-07    49.8   79.9
   8   MacIntyre Care                                       31-Mar-07    34.5   92.1
   9   Rethink Severe Mental Illness                        31-Mar-07    32.9   76.9
  10   JTL                                                  31-Jul-06    32.3   97.5
  11   Victim Support                                       01-Mar-07    31.6   97.8
  12   Quarriers                                            31-Mar-07    31.1   79.8
       Family Fund for Families with Severely
  13   Disabled Children                                    31-Mar-07    30.0   96.6
  14   Cornerstone Community Care                           31-Mar-07    27.5   97.9
  15   Rathbone Training                                    30-Jul-07    27.3   86.4

          Date Arial Bold 10pt
Trends in corporate giving
                                                      little growth in cash giving

                     Value of corporate cash and in-kind giving

          1200        Incl GSK
          1000        Excl GSK

            800
            600

            400
            200

              0
                  2001/02     2002/03   2003/04   2004/05   2005/06
                                                                      Threats and/ or opportunities?
                                                                      •impact of CSR agendas
                                                                      •co-option of agenda through social
                                                                      capitalism and blended value

Source: Charity Trends, CAF, 2006
                                                                      •alignment with marketing
Wealth in places – the charitable trusts
 Charitable grant-making trusts have asset base of £38 billion,
 an investment income of £1billion


But they are not a Rock………..grant-makers also depend on other sources


                           Role?
                           •strategic (change or maintenance?)
      £2.6bn               •social justice? – the Woburn Collaborative
                           •partnership (who?)
                           •social investors (loans or grants?)
Trends in funds available from charitable trusts




     Date Arial Bold 10pt
Trends in giving by UK general public

              UK Individual giving as % of GDP 1996 - 2006

 2.5
                                                             US 2%
  2
                                                                     Who calls the shots?
 1.5   1.1%
                                                             0.9%
  1
 0.5
                                                                     •private giving is
  0
                                                                     dependent on a small
                                                                     number of – very
            0


            1


            2


            3


            4


            5


            6
           6


           7


           8


           9

        00


        00


        00


        00


        00


        00


        00
         /9


         /9


         /9


         /9
     95


     96


     97


     98


      /2


      /2


      /2


      /2


      /2


      /2


      /2
                                                                     powerful – individuals
   99


   00


   01


   02


   03


   04


   05
   19


   19


   19


   19

 19


 20


 20


 20


 20


 20


 20
                                                                     •half of Rich List
 Giving is flat-lining – why?                                        giving 2007 was two
                                                                     donors
Share of wealth and share of giving
                             Share of       Share of
                             wealth %       giving %


Most wealthy 1%                 23            7.3


Most wealthy 10%                56             21


Less wealthy 90%                44             79


                   should wealthy get more tax-breaks or more tax?

                                                 •US-style reliefs?

                                            •role of major donors?
Emerging social investment market
blurs traditional view of ‘value’ - can be as either economic or social
New players                                     Old wine – new bottles
                                                       private trusts
  Special banks
                                                       government
     UCIT
                                                           equity
    Triodos
     CDFIs
              Special funds
         Local Investment Funds
                  Bridges                   Social Investment
              Venturesome
                 Impetus                    •new independence or constraints?
         Adventure Capital Fund
                 BigInvest                  •how far should sector go?
             FutureBuilders                 •who are the new brokers?
                   CAN
The new brokers, intermediaries and infrastructure

Services                        Providers
Banking                         Charity Bank, Triodos, Unity Trust
Microfinance - retail           CDFI, Credit Unions
Microfinance - wholesale        ACCION, Blue Orchard, SIB?
Investee/ charity information   NPC, GuideStar, CaritasData
Investment funds                ARK, Impetus, CAN
Investor/ donor advice          NPC, UBS, Coutts, Big Give
Performance measurement         NPC, NEF
Generic market information      Global Economic Monitor (GEM)
Accreditation and validation    GlobalGiving, GiveIndia, Greater Good
                                South Africa, CAF
Fragile organisational model?

Social enterprises strike a difficult balance between organisational goals,
allocation of control rights, incentive structure and characteristics of the
markets in which they operate

While these elements allow social enterprises to adapt their internal
organisation to the specific problems posed by the production of personal
and collective services, they also make the social enterprise a fragile
organisational model, extremely sensitive to changes in market conditions
and public policies



         Bacchiega and Borzaga, in The Emergence of Social Enterprise, 2001
Who should guard the third sector space?

Generally, it's alarmist to claim that government is some malicious
leviathan intent on colonising voluntary and charitable organisations.

Anyone who knows anything about government knows it's not joined-
up enough to do that. Government as a funder - like any funder - has a
right to specify what it wants its money to achieve.

The real question for charities - which, if they are delivering public
services, should do just what they're paid to do - is who should be the
guardians of independence?


                                         Third Sector, February, 2008
Expectations – ‘added value’ funding

                           Third sector

         Government                          Better services

        Major donors                         Social change

       Charitable trusts                      Social justice

        General public                        Market gaps

       Social investors                     SROI, innovation

         Companies                        Social responsibility
                                          Then the quote
Challenges of the future funding environment
 •   new opportunities – new risks/ expectations

 •   new stakeholders, new funding infrastructure bodies

 •   sector fragmentation and specialisation

 •   unrestricted funding?                     NEW!
                                               Recession!
 •   strain, room to manoeuvre?

 •   adding value/ transformational power
      - or driving re-engineering and co-option?

More Related Content

Similar to Trends and challenges in the emerging private, philanthropic and statutory funding environments for the third sector

Measuring complexity
Measuring complexityMeasuring complexity
Measuring complexity
Lubna Hasan
 
Measuring complexity
Measuring complexityMeasuring complexity
Measuring complexity
Lubna Hasan
 
Economic presentation
Economic presentationEconomic presentation
Economic presentation
Erin McClarty
 
Print Publishing Sustainability_PIRA 2012
Print Publishing Sustainability_PIRA 2012Print Publishing Sustainability_PIRA 2012
Print Publishing Sustainability_PIRA 2012
Prinovis UK Ltd
 
America’s Incredible, Shrinking, Aging, Less Ready, Ever More Expensive Armed...
America’s Incredible, Shrinking, Aging, Less Ready, Ever More Expensive Armed...America’s Incredible, Shrinking, Aging, Less Ready, Ever More Expensive Armed...
America’s Incredible, Shrinking, Aging, Less Ready, Ever More Expensive Armed...
Picard578
 
Exploration social licence in peru
Exploration social licence in peruExploration social licence in peru
Exploration social licence in peru
Yanacocha
 
Public Health Booklet
Public Health BookletPublic Health Booklet
Public Health Booklet
msdhillon72
 
Zones of Emergency Talk Treborscholz
Zones of Emergency Talk TreborscholzZones of Emergency Talk Treborscholz
Zones of Emergency Talk Treborscholz
The New School
 
The low carbon society challenges and opportunities
The low carbon society   challenges and opportunitiesThe low carbon society   challenges and opportunities
The low carbon society challenges and opportunities
Richard Male
 

Similar to Trends and challenges in the emerging private, philanthropic and statutory funding environments for the third sector (20)

Measuring complexity
Measuring complexityMeasuring complexity
Measuring complexity
 
Measuring complexity
Measuring complexityMeasuring complexity
Measuring complexity
 
Economic presentation
Economic presentationEconomic presentation
Economic presentation
 
Print Publishing Sustainability_PIRA 2012
Print Publishing Sustainability_PIRA 2012Print Publishing Sustainability_PIRA 2012
Print Publishing Sustainability_PIRA 2012
 
From content to community
From content to communityFrom content to community
From content to community
 
Developing online marketing strategy to the Rural Sector. NZ 2010
Developing online marketing strategy to the Rural Sector. NZ 2010Developing online marketing strategy to the Rural Sector. NZ 2010
Developing online marketing strategy to the Rural Sector. NZ 2010
 
2.helen maher
2.helen maher2.helen maher
2.helen maher
 
A Fresh Start
A Fresh StartA Fresh Start
A Fresh Start
 
Intellectual Capital: Define, Understand and Capture It
Intellectual Capital: Define, Understand and Capture ItIntellectual Capital: Define, Understand and Capture It
Intellectual Capital: Define, Understand and Capture It
 
Impact of technology
Impact of technologyImpact of technology
Impact of technology
 
Rand city
Rand cityRand city
Rand city
 
The Role of the Intangibles Information Gap in the Financialization of the A...
The Role of the Intangibles Information Gap in the Financialization of the A...The Role of the Intangibles Information Gap in the Financialization of the A...
The Role of the Intangibles Information Gap in the Financialization of the A...
 
America’s Incredible, Shrinking, Aging, Less Ready, Ever More Expensive Armed...
America’s Incredible, Shrinking, Aging, Less Ready, Ever More Expensive Armed...America’s Incredible, Shrinking, Aging, Less Ready, Ever More Expensive Armed...
America’s Incredible, Shrinking, Aging, Less Ready, Ever More Expensive Armed...
 
Sharism In Action
Sharism In ActionSharism In Action
Sharism In Action
 
Exploration social licence in peru
Exploration social licence in peruExploration social licence in peru
Exploration social licence in peru
 
Public Health Booklet
Public Health BookletPublic Health Booklet
Public Health Booklet
 
PDF Fraud Reporting, National Fraud Authority
PDF Fraud Reporting, National Fraud AuthorityPDF Fraud Reporting, National Fraud Authority
PDF Fraud Reporting, National Fraud Authority
 
Addressing cardiovascular disease at EU level: tangible plans for the future
Addressing cardiovascular disease at EU level: tangible plans for the futureAddressing cardiovascular disease at EU level: tangible plans for the future
Addressing cardiovascular disease at EU level: tangible plans for the future
 
Zones of Emergency Talk Treborscholz
Zones of Emergency Talk TreborscholzZones of Emergency Talk Treborscholz
Zones of Emergency Talk Treborscholz
 
The low carbon society challenges and opportunities
The low carbon society   challenges and opportunitiesThe low carbon society   challenges and opportunities
The low carbon society challenges and opportunities
 

More from Giving Centre

Family Foundation Giving report 2014
Family Foundation Giving report 2014Family Foundation Giving report 2014
Family Foundation Giving report 2014
Giving Centre
 
An insight into funding in ne slide presentation - cathy pharoah 31.03.14
An insight into funding in ne   slide presentation - cathy pharoah  31.03.14An insight into funding in ne   slide presentation - cathy pharoah  31.03.14
An insight into funding in ne slide presentation - cathy pharoah 31.03.14
Giving Centre
 
The Canadian Experience. Susan Phillips
The Canadian Experience. Susan PhillipsThe Canadian Experience. Susan Phillips
The Canadian Experience. Susan Phillips
Giving Centre
 
Corporate responsibility, boardroom representation and philanthropy. Matthew ...
Corporate responsibility, boardroom representation and philanthropy. Matthew ...Corporate responsibility, boardroom representation and philanthropy. Matthew ...
Corporate responsibility, boardroom representation and philanthropy. Matthew ...
Giving Centre
 
Love not Money. Paul Caulfield
Love not Money. Paul CaulfieldLove not Money. Paul Caulfield
Love not Money. Paul Caulfield
Giving Centre
 
Giving back to communities of residence and of origin. Cathy Pharoah and Tom ...
Giving back to communities of residence and of origin. Cathy Pharoah and Tom ...Giving back to communities of residence and of origin. Cathy Pharoah and Tom ...
Giving back to communities of residence and of origin. Cathy Pharoah and Tom ...
Giving Centre
 
Just Giving? Rob Reich
Just Giving? Rob ReichJust Giving? Rob Reich
Just Giving? Rob Reich
Giving Centre
 
Emerging opportunities and tensions in community foundations’ development in ...
Emerging opportunities and tensions in community foundations’ development in ...Emerging opportunities and tensions in community foundations’ development in ...
Emerging opportunities and tensions in community foundations’ development in ...
Giving Centre
 
Local empowerment through philanthropy – is the Community Foundation the righ...
Local empowerment through philanthropy – is the Community Foundation the righ...Local empowerment through philanthropy – is the Community Foundation the righ...
Local empowerment through philanthropy – is the Community Foundation the righ...
Giving Centre
 
A practitioner perspective on bringing community need and major philanthropy ...
A practitioner perspective on bringing community need and major philanthropy ...A practitioner perspective on bringing community need and major philanthropy ...
A practitioner perspective on bringing community need and major philanthropy ...
Giving Centre
 
Giving, philanthropy and creating a democratic society. Cathy Pharoah and Tom...
Giving, philanthropy and creating a democratic society. Cathy Pharoah and Tom...Giving, philanthropy and creating a democratic society. Cathy Pharoah and Tom...
Giving, philanthropy and creating a democratic society. Cathy Pharoah and Tom...
Giving Centre
 
Giving, philanthropy and creating a democratic society. Findings from studies...
Giving, philanthropy and creating a democratic society. Findings from studies...Giving, philanthropy and creating a democratic society. Findings from studies...
Giving, philanthropy and creating a democratic society. Findings from studies...
Giving Centre
 
Giving Circles and Democratizing Philanthropy
Giving Circles and Democratizing PhilanthropyGiving Circles and Democratizing Philanthropy
Giving Circles and Democratizing Philanthropy
Giving Centre
 
Speaker biographies Friday 10th May
Speaker biographies Friday 10th MaySpeaker biographies Friday 10th May
Speaker biographies Friday 10th May
Giving Centre
 
Speaker biographies Thursday 9th May
Speaker biographies Thursday 9th MaySpeaker biographies Thursday 9th May
Speaker biographies Thursday 9th May
Giving Centre
 

More from Giving Centre (20)

Family Foundation Giving report 2014
Family Foundation Giving report 2014Family Foundation Giving report 2014
Family Foundation Giving report 2014
 
An insight into funding in ne slide presentation - cathy pharoah 31.03.14
An insight into funding in ne   slide presentation - cathy pharoah  31.03.14An insight into funding in ne   slide presentation - cathy pharoah  31.03.14
An insight into funding in ne slide presentation - cathy pharoah 31.03.14
 
Philanthropists as change makers
Philanthropists as change makersPhilanthropists as change makers
Philanthropists as change makers
 
Trust Fundraising in the current context: IoF presentation CP Oct 2013
Trust Fundraising in the current context: IoF presentation CP Oct 2013Trust Fundraising in the current context: IoF presentation CP Oct 2013
Trust Fundraising in the current context: IoF presentation CP Oct 2013
 
Power and Philanthropy: CP Charterhouse Presentation Sept 2013
Power and Philanthropy: CP Charterhouse Presentation Sept 2013Power and Philanthropy: CP Charterhouse Presentation Sept 2013
Power and Philanthropy: CP Charterhouse Presentation Sept 2013
 
Austerity in another time: work and philanthropy in the International Union f...
Austerity in another time: work and philanthropy in the International Union f...Austerity in another time: work and philanthropy in the International Union f...
Austerity in another time: work and philanthropy in the International Union f...
 
Women led philanthropy
Women led philanthropyWomen led philanthropy
Women led philanthropy
 
The Canadian Experience. Susan Phillips
The Canadian Experience. Susan PhillipsThe Canadian Experience. Susan Phillips
The Canadian Experience. Susan Phillips
 
Corporate responsibility, boardroom representation and philanthropy. Matthew ...
Corporate responsibility, boardroom representation and philanthropy. Matthew ...Corporate responsibility, boardroom representation and philanthropy. Matthew ...
Corporate responsibility, boardroom representation and philanthropy. Matthew ...
 
Love not Money. Paul Caulfield
Love not Money. Paul CaulfieldLove not Money. Paul Caulfield
Love not Money. Paul Caulfield
 
Giving back to communities of residence and of origin. Cathy Pharoah and Tom ...
Giving back to communities of residence and of origin. Cathy Pharoah and Tom ...Giving back to communities of residence and of origin. Cathy Pharoah and Tom ...
Giving back to communities of residence and of origin. Cathy Pharoah and Tom ...
 
Just Giving? Rob Reich
Just Giving? Rob ReichJust Giving? Rob Reich
Just Giving? Rob Reich
 
Emerging opportunities and tensions in community foundations’ development in ...
Emerging opportunities and tensions in community foundations’ development in ...Emerging opportunities and tensions in community foundations’ development in ...
Emerging opportunities and tensions in community foundations’ development in ...
 
Local empowerment through philanthropy – is the Community Foundation the righ...
Local empowerment through philanthropy – is the Community Foundation the righ...Local empowerment through philanthropy – is the Community Foundation the righ...
Local empowerment through philanthropy – is the Community Foundation the righ...
 
A practitioner perspective on bringing community need and major philanthropy ...
A practitioner perspective on bringing community need and major philanthropy ...A practitioner perspective on bringing community need and major philanthropy ...
A practitioner perspective on bringing community need and major philanthropy ...
 
Giving, philanthropy and creating a democratic society. Cathy Pharoah and Tom...
Giving, philanthropy and creating a democratic society. Cathy Pharoah and Tom...Giving, philanthropy and creating a democratic society. Cathy Pharoah and Tom...
Giving, philanthropy and creating a democratic society. Cathy Pharoah and Tom...
 
Giving, philanthropy and creating a democratic society. Findings from studies...
Giving, philanthropy and creating a democratic society. Findings from studies...Giving, philanthropy and creating a democratic society. Findings from studies...
Giving, philanthropy and creating a democratic society. Findings from studies...
 
Giving Circles and Democratizing Philanthropy
Giving Circles and Democratizing PhilanthropyGiving Circles and Democratizing Philanthropy
Giving Circles and Democratizing Philanthropy
 
Speaker biographies Friday 10th May
Speaker biographies Friday 10th MaySpeaker biographies Friday 10th May
Speaker biographies Friday 10th May
 
Speaker biographies Thursday 9th May
Speaker biographies Thursday 9th MaySpeaker biographies Thursday 9th May
Speaker biographies Thursday 9th May
 

Trends and challenges in the emerging private, philanthropic and statutory funding environments for the third sector

  • 1. Trends and challenges in the emerging private, philanthropic and statutory funding environments for the third sector Cathy Pharoah Professor of Charity Funding Co-Director, ESRC Research Centre for Charitable Giving and Philanthropy Cass Business School
  • 2. The funding environment • third sector – increasingly open and contested space – how is this playing out from the perspective of its funding? • increasingly multi-stakeholder funding environment – local and national government, other state agencies, quangos, lenders, companies, venture and major philanthropists, users, activists • different/ competing agendas, expectations, roles • what are funding trends and sector dependencies? • adding value, transformational power, re-engineering, co-option?
  • 3. The framing of today’s third sector – open season? Charities 170,000, 1000 new (or transfers) per year, income £46 bn Social enterprises 55,000, turnover £27 bn, 5% of all businesses with employees, 1% of GDP; 700 Community Interest Companies since 05, mainly CLG, range of business Partnerships 5,500 local hybrids, Sure Start/Connexions/Neighbourhood Renewal (£4 bn) Quangos and agencies Independent Living Fund, British Educational Communications and Technology Agency, Skills for Care, Skills for Care, the Specialist Schools and Academies Trust (£3bn) Community organisations 5- 900,000, property assets/ transfers eg village halls/community centres/historic buildings Civil society 865,000 organisations, total income £109 billion
  • 4. Shape of charitable expenditure today 1 Cancer Research UK 31-Mar-07 553.2 2 The British Council 31-Mar-07 545.7 3 Nuffield Hospitals 31-Dec-06 478.7 4 The Wellcome Trust 31-Mar-07 468.9 International Finance Facility for Immunisation 5 Company 31-Dec-06 441.8 6 The National Trust 28-Feb-07 312.8 7 Oxfam 30-Apr-07 297.2 8 CITB-ConstructionSkills 31-Dec-06 250.4 9 Anchor Trust 31-Mar-07 241.2 10 NCH 31-Mar-07 214.0 11 Church Commissioners for England 31-Dec-06 201.2 12 The British Red Cross Society 31-Dec-06 200.9 13 Barnardo's 31-Mar-07 195.6 14 Royal Mencap Society 31-Mar-07 172.1 15 British Heart Foundation 31-Mar-07 167.2
  • 5. Third Sector’s Funding dependencies Individuals 9,500 Investments 7,000 Stat grants 6,000 Stat fees 2,500 Legacies 1,600 Lottery (non-BLF) 1,300 Trusts (med, aca) 1,200 Trusts (gen, BLF) 1,100 Companies 1,000 Social investors 790 £m 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 Date Arial Bold 10pt
  • 6. Shape of third sector funding today companies other social investors 2% govt grants 9% 3% 10% trusts govt fees 6% 23% people (dead) 6% lottery people (live) 5% 36%
  • 7. State funding by sub-sector – top charities % of funding from state 70 59 60 51 46 48 50 40 34 34 24 25 25 28 30 19 20 10 0 S h D er es ut y n re AI t le l lit nc lth re en na yo ic fa op bi ild ca ea sp nm io el sa pe ch at w ho lh di ro rn al d ta vi in te ci en en bl in so m who is the major shareholder? what is the right shareholding? what does the public think?
  • 8. Top service-providing charities by % statutory funds 1 NCH 31-Mar-07 193.5 88.9 2 Royal Mencap Society 31-Mar-07 150.9 84.9 3 Leonard Cheshire Disability 31-Mar-07 130.6 89.5 4 Barnardo's 31-Mar-07 111.1 57.9 5 National Autistic Society [The] 31-Mar-07 62.9 84.6 6 Sense - National Deafblind and Rubella Association 31-Mar-07 51.6 74.3 7 Turning Point 31-Mar-07 49.8 79.9 8 MacIntyre Care 31-Mar-07 34.5 92.1 9 Rethink Severe Mental Illness 31-Mar-07 32.9 76.9 10 JTL 31-Jul-06 32.3 97.5 11 Victim Support 01-Mar-07 31.6 97.8 12 Quarriers 31-Mar-07 31.1 79.8 Family Fund for Families with Severely 13 Disabled Children 31-Mar-07 30.0 96.6 14 Cornerstone Community Care 31-Mar-07 27.5 97.9 15 Rathbone Training 30-Jul-07 27.3 86.4 Date Arial Bold 10pt
  • 9. Trends in corporate giving little growth in cash giving Value of corporate cash and in-kind giving 1200 Incl GSK 1000 Excl GSK 800 600 400 200 0 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 Threats and/ or opportunities? •impact of CSR agendas •co-option of agenda through social capitalism and blended value Source: Charity Trends, CAF, 2006 •alignment with marketing
  • 10. Wealth in places – the charitable trusts Charitable grant-making trusts have asset base of £38 billion, an investment income of £1billion But they are not a Rock………..grant-makers also depend on other sources Role? •strategic (change or maintenance?) £2.6bn •social justice? – the Woburn Collaborative •partnership (who?) •social investors (loans or grants?)
  • 11. Trends in funds available from charitable trusts Date Arial Bold 10pt
  • 12. Trends in giving by UK general public UK Individual giving as % of GDP 1996 - 2006 2.5 US 2% 2 Who calls the shots? 1.5 1.1% 0.9% 1 0.5 •private giving is 0 dependent on a small number of – very 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 7 8 9 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 /9 /9 /9 /9 95 96 97 98 /2 /2 /2 /2 /2 /2 /2 powerful – individuals 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 •half of Rich List Giving is flat-lining – why? giving 2007 was two donors
  • 13. Share of wealth and share of giving Share of Share of wealth % giving % Most wealthy 1% 23 7.3 Most wealthy 10% 56 21 Less wealthy 90% 44 79 should wealthy get more tax-breaks or more tax? •US-style reliefs? •role of major donors?
  • 14. Emerging social investment market blurs traditional view of ‘value’ - can be as either economic or social New players Old wine – new bottles private trusts Special banks government UCIT equity Triodos CDFIs Special funds Local Investment Funds Bridges Social Investment Venturesome Impetus •new independence or constraints? Adventure Capital Fund BigInvest •how far should sector go? FutureBuilders •who are the new brokers? CAN
  • 15. The new brokers, intermediaries and infrastructure Services Providers Banking Charity Bank, Triodos, Unity Trust Microfinance - retail CDFI, Credit Unions Microfinance - wholesale ACCION, Blue Orchard, SIB? Investee/ charity information NPC, GuideStar, CaritasData Investment funds ARK, Impetus, CAN Investor/ donor advice NPC, UBS, Coutts, Big Give Performance measurement NPC, NEF Generic market information Global Economic Monitor (GEM) Accreditation and validation GlobalGiving, GiveIndia, Greater Good South Africa, CAF
  • 16. Fragile organisational model? Social enterprises strike a difficult balance between organisational goals, allocation of control rights, incentive structure and characteristics of the markets in which they operate While these elements allow social enterprises to adapt their internal organisation to the specific problems posed by the production of personal and collective services, they also make the social enterprise a fragile organisational model, extremely sensitive to changes in market conditions and public policies Bacchiega and Borzaga, in The Emergence of Social Enterprise, 2001
  • 17. Who should guard the third sector space? Generally, it's alarmist to claim that government is some malicious leviathan intent on colonising voluntary and charitable organisations. Anyone who knows anything about government knows it's not joined- up enough to do that. Government as a funder - like any funder - has a right to specify what it wants its money to achieve. The real question for charities - which, if they are delivering public services, should do just what they're paid to do - is who should be the guardians of independence? Third Sector, February, 2008
  • 18. Expectations – ‘added value’ funding Third sector Government Better services Major donors Social change Charitable trusts Social justice General public Market gaps Social investors SROI, innovation Companies Social responsibility Then the quote
  • 19. Challenges of the future funding environment • new opportunities – new risks/ expectations • new stakeholders, new funding infrastructure bodies • sector fragmentation and specialisation • unrestricted funding? NEW! Recession! • strain, room to manoeuvre? • adding value/ transformational power - or driving re-engineering and co-option?