1. How much further can demand management strategies go to ensure future water security for SEQ? Tanzi Smith, Darren Edward*, Alex Kazaglis and Andrea Turner *independent contributor THINK. CHANGE. DO INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE FUTURES
2.
3. A snapshot SEQ’s current and future water needs 440 GL/a 630 GL/a 450 GL/a used by SEQ prior to drought 2004 2007 2050 Source: Queensland Government 2007 (based on high saving scenario, medium population growth) GAP = 540 GL/a 440 GL/a Yield derated by 30% Population: 2.8 million Demand in 2050: 980 GL/a (including 30GL for climate change, 20GL for rural irrigation) Population: 5.1 million
4. Queensland Government’s proposed strategy A diverse portfolio with controversial elements ~186 GL/a ~24 GL/a Existing Government savings program (industrial recycling, efficiencies etc) Western corridor recycling Additional minor surface and groundwater sources Expanded Tugun Desalination plant 84 GL/a 62 GL/a 50 GL/a GAP = 134 GL/a Leakage reduction The WATER GRID + Additional demand of 540GL/a Traveston Crossing 150 GL/a Wyaralong Dam 18GL/a Qld Govt plans two new dams to fill this gap:
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10. Alternatives to new dams: Which is the better option to meet the 134GL/a gap? But the Qld Government’s remains reluctant to expand DM Further Urban sector DM Dry Cooling DM Option: New Water: 230 GL/a Unit Cost : $1.08-1.15/kL Social and Environmental Impact : Low/positive Traveston Crossing & Wyaralong Dams Two new Dams Option: New Water: 168 GL/a Unit Cost : $3.4-4.65/kL Social and Environmental Impact : High
11.
12.
13.
14.
Editor's Notes
Latest figures in EIS suggest that there are 213 GL/a worth of infrastructure planned (exlcuding expansion of Tugun - 15 GL)