Ohio demographic trends and their impact on cities
1. Alison D. Goebel, PhD
Associate Director
Greater Ohio Policy Center
October 29, 2015
2. ABOUT GREATER OHIO POLICY CENTER
An outcome-oriented
statewide non-profit that
champions revitalization and
sustainable redevelopment in
Ohio:
• Revitalize Ohio’s urban
cores and metropolitan
regions
• Achieve sustainable land
reuse and economic
growth
3. ABOUT GREATER OHIO POLICY CENTER:
SUBJECT AREA EXPERTISE
Urban regeneration
Sustainably revitalize
urban cores and
neighborhoods
Transportation &
infrastructure
modernization
Develop improved &
modern infrastructure
Regional growth
Promote regional economic
development & collaborative
governance structures
4. ABOUT GREATER OHIO POLICY CENTER:
HOW WE DO OUR WORK
• Develop and publish research
• Use research to advocate for practical
policy solutions at the state level
• Assist communities through strategic
assistance and dissemination of best
practices
• Build collaborative partnerships to
extend our reach and ability to impact
change
7. OHIO’S POPULATION GROWTH HAS SLOWED
SIGNIFICANTLY SINCE 1970S
Exhibit 1-1. Total Population, 1910-2014
14,000,000
12,000,000 11,594,163
10,000,000
8,000,000
6,000,000
4,000,000
2,000,000
0
1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2014
Year
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Decennial Censuses and 2014 State Total Population Estimates
8. OHIO’S PROJECTED POPULATION GROWTH FOR
NEXT 25 YEARS IS MINIMAL
2015-2040: Population growth
Ohio: expected to grow 0.04% per year (net gain of
~85,000)
• Ohio 2014 population: 11,594,163
• Projected 2040 pop: 11,678,970
United States: expected to grow 0.69% per year (net gain
nearly 60 million)
• US 2014 population: 318,857,056
9. OHIO IS AGING; OLDER COUNTIES ARE NOT EXPECTING
YOUNGER COHORTS TO REPLACE AGING RESIDENTS
2015: population age 55+ Projected overall population growth
2015-2040
10. OHIOANS IN HOUSEHOLDS EARNING LESS THAN 120% AREA
MEDIAN INCOME (2014): NOT JUST A LARGE CITY CHALLENGE
12. LAND CONSUMPTION IN OHIO
HAS OUTPACED POPULATION GROWTH
• Ohio is 8th in land conversion but only 45th in
population growth, nationally
• Ohio’s rate of development of acres outpaced
its population growth by almost 6 times in last
thirty years
13. COUNTY POPULATION CHANGE OUTSIDE
CENTRAL CITY, 1950-2010
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Summit
Stark
Hamilton
Cuyahoga
Franklin
Montgomery
Lucas
Youngstown
14. POPULATION INCREASE IN EX-URBAN COUNTIES, BUT NOT
UNIFORMLY ACROSS STATE
Darker blue=most
population growth
Darkest
red=greatest loss of
population
15. AS POPULATIONS SHIFT AROUND THE METRO, HOUSING IS LEFT
VACANT, RAISING LIKELIHOOD OF BLIGHT, MAKING IT THAT MUCH
HARDER TO MAINTAIN AN ATTRACTIVE, COMPETITIVE COMMUNITY
Note: Ottawa Co.
in NW Ohio has
high rates of
vacancy due to the
number vacation
homes that are
used only part of
the year
16. CHALLENGES WITH POPULATION STAGNATION
AND AGING COMMUNITIES
1. Physical decline—blighted houses, shuttered businesses, outdated
commercial and industrial facilities
2. Rising Legacy Costs and Declining Tax Base
• Ohio will need over $25 billion to maintain and upgrade aging water
infrastructure over the next 20 years.
• Tax base shrinking with population loss.
3. Persistent Poverty and Inequity
• Neighborhoods in decline are disproportionately affecting low income
populations
• Remaining economic/racial disparities that bring down the rest of the
region
17. GOPC’S STATE POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Establish innovative financing programs that support
infrastructure modernization and fund brownfield
redevelopment
2. Align ODOT administrative regions with state
business growth efforts to improve economic
development strategies and transportation investment
decisions
3. Develop programming that connects entrepreneurs
with vacant commercial buildings
4. Create a loan program that links small business
lending with neighborhood improvement efforts
19. OHIO IS BECOMING MORE RACIALLY/ETHNICALLY
DIVERSE: THIS IS A GOOD TREND
20. OHIO’S MILLENNIALS (AGES 25-34)
The Millennials (those
aged 25-34) are the
largest age cohort,
nationally.
• In Ohio they made
up 13% of 2013
state population, still
smaller than 45-54
age cohort
Under 5
years
6%
5 to 9
years
6%
10 to 14
years
7%
15 to 19 years
7%
20 to 24 years
7%
25 to 34 years
13%
35 to 44 years
12%
45 to 54 years
14%
55 to 59 years
7%
60 to 64
years
6%
65 to 74 years
8%
75 to 84 years
5%
85 years and over
2%
Ohio 2013 pop distribution
21. OHIO’S MILLENNIALS (AGES 25-34)
91% of Ohio’s millennials with college degrees live in
the state’s 8 largest metros
22.
23. Ohio is a State of
Regions.
Local prosperity rides
on regional fortunes.
24. OHIO’S METROS ARE THE ECONOMIC DRIVERS OF OUR STATE AND
THE KEY ENGINES TO OUR ECONOMY ARE OUR URBAN CORES
1. Toledo
2. Sandusky
3. Cleveland
Elyria
Lorain
4. Akron
5. Warren
Youngstown
6. Lima
7. Mansfield
8. Canton
9. Steubenville
10. Dayton
Piqua
11. Springfield
12. Columbus
Lancaster
Newark
13. East Liverpool
14. Cincinnati
Hamilton
Middletown
15. Ironton
16. Marietta
25. THE VAST MAJORITY OF OHIOANS LIVE IN A METRO
Almost every
single Ohioan
lives within an
hour’s drive of
an urbanized
area.
Clockwise: Piqua; Mansfield; Cincinna
81% of all
Ohioans live in 1
of 16 metro
regions
Ohio’s 16 metro
regions hold 84%
of the state’s jobs
Ohio’s 16 metro
regions produce
87% of the state’s
GDP
Half of the state’s
population lives
within 10 miles of
an urban core.
26. OHIO’S MAJOR URBAN COUNTIES CONTAIN THE JOBS THAT EMPLOY
THE METRO REGION
Green=“inflow of
workers” (i.e. county
receives workers
commuting from
another county)
Blue=“outflow of
workers” (i.e.
residents leave
county for their job)
27. WHY REGIONS MATTER FOR ECONOMIC
REGROWTH
• Municipalities, suburbs, and
townships and their regions are
economically interdependent
• Regional development and regional
attraction will be the only way to
economically thrive, in the long term
28. Cleveland
Akron
Canton
Youngstown
Lorain
Northeast OHIO:
five legacy cities
embedded in a
single region of
over 5,000 mi2
REGIONAL INITIATIVES: LONG TERM ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY
Urban centers, suburbs, and rural townships are embedded in larger
economic regions, which is how other areas of the country are succeeding
30. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COLLABORATION &
COOPERATION IS CRITICAL
Local
Government
Metropolitan
Planning
Organizations
Education
Service
Centers
County
Engineers
County
Executive or
County
Commissioners
Major cities
31. COLLABORATION, COOPERATION, AND SELECTIVE
CONSOLIDATION LEADS TO:
Economies of
scale
Improved local
government
accountability
Equalization of
service quantity
and quality
Coordinated
economic
competitiveness
Ability to retain
local community
character and
flavor
32. REGIONAL UPSHOT
Looking beyond jurisdictional boundaries allows
communities to maximize resources and identify new
markets
Multi-faceted public/private partnerships are capable of
driving sustained regeneration, on a regional basis
Effective ties between cities and their regions to foster
stronger economic growth for both
34. OPPORTUNITIES TO LEVERAGE AND ATTRACT
RESIDENTS IN KEY DEMOGRAPHIC GROUPS
Nationally, the market is seeking walking able neighborhoods that
are denser and are mixed-use.
Millennials and Baby Boomers are returning to cities and older
suburbs.
Baby boomer, as they age, may have fewer options and lower
desire to live in ex-urban areas as driving becomes untenable for
some
Immigrants are significant contributors to population growth and
economic regeneration and are less interested in suburban-style
communities
35. STRATEGIES THAT ARE MAKING AN IMPACT
1. Target resources in viable neighborhoods,
especially neighborhoods facing economic
challenges but that can “tip back” to health
2. Focus on rebuilding the downtown or core of
community
3. Leverage economic assets to build competitive
advantages
4. Repurpose vacant land and buildings for new
uses
36. ASSETS TO LEVERAGE IN OLDER COMMUNITIES
• Great “bones” – historic buildings, cultural
assets, eds and meds, existing
infrastructure
• Lifestyle and affordability
• Inherent walkability – “streetcar suburbs”
and “main street” communities
• Sense of community
• Excess land ripe for redevelopment
37. THE MARKET WANTS WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOODS
AND THEY ARE COST EFFECTIVE!
Walkable
neighborhoods
with
transportation
options save
money and
resources Downtown Mansfield, Mansfield Ohio
from http://www.hivelocitymedia.com/cities/Mansfield/
38. WHAT IS SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Sustainable Development: is development that meets the needs of
the present without compromising the ability of future generations to
meet their own needs.
In Ohio this means building urban, suburban and rural communities
with housing and transportation choices near jobs, shops and
schools.
More compact development puts existing capacity to work, lowers
infrastructure costs per capita, and helps ensure infrastructure is
maintained before repairs get expensive.
39. SUSTAINABLE GROWTH IS COST EFFECTIVE
In general, sustainable growth development
costs one-third less for upfront infrastructure,
such as: new construction of roads, sewers,
and water lines.
Source: “Building Better Budgets: A National Examination of the Fisca
Benefits of Smart Growth Development,” Smart Growth America, May
2013
40. SUSTAINABLE GROWTH IS COST EFFECTIVE
Sustainable growth development saves
taxpayers an average of 10 percent on
ongoing delivery of services, such as
police, ambulance, and fire service costs,
by reducing distances service vehicles must
drive.
Source: “Building Better Budgets: A National Examination of the Fiscal
Benefits of Smart Growth Development,” Smart Growth America, May
2013
41. CRITICAL NEXT STRATEGIES: STRATEGIC
INCREMENTALISM FOR OHIO’S COMMUNITIES
• Requires a coherent vision of the future. Clear
long-term goals grounded in small, but achievable
steps
• Be creative in identifying assets in your community
and leverage them
• Set clear long-term goals and identify small,
achievable steps to get you there
• Look beyond jurisdictional boundaries maximize
resources and identify new markets
42. STATE POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS
• Increase state funding and federal funds flexed
for transit
• Improve communities’ ability to revitalize vacant
and abandoned buildings
• Implement a statewide Safe Streets policy to
ensure safety of all users and encourage
economic development
43. GOPC RESEARCH TO BE RELEASED IN 2015
• Study of Opportunity neighborhoods
in Ohio
• Analysis of what gives some small
and medium-sized cities their
competitive edge
44. Alison D. Goebel, PhD
Associate Director
Greater Ohio Policy
Center
agoebel@greaterohio.or
g
@alisongoebelOH
www.greaterohio.org
614-224-0187
Editor's Notes
Who is GOPC? : We are an outcome-oriented statewide non-profit that champions revitalization and sustainable redevelopment in Ohio :
Our aim is to make Ohio economically competitive by promoting sustainable land use. In particular we want to revitalize our urban cores and metropolitan regions to make them attractive to current and prospective residents and businesses.
Non-partisan, non-profit, primarily foundation-funded
We carefully maintain a bi-partisan, nonpartisan reputation and are perceived by policymakers as “middle of the road.”
GOPC has a bipartisan board and advances data-driven recommendations that transcend party lines
We are a “think and do” tank that focuses on 3 policies areas that we think will help the state become economically competitive in the future.
1. Encourage redevelopment of walkable neighborhoods and central business districts to generate the density that produces higher taxes, more entrepreneurial creativity and offers a range of amenities
2. Address spatial mismatch between where we work, play and live. We want to see increased resources for these improvements and consideration of options that don’t include highways. For example, more robust transit systems.
3. Reduce competition between local governments and the fragmentation in our state’s regions will help regions to economically compete as unified fronts
GOPC’s interest is in
Removing barriers that make it hard for local government leaders, nonprofit officials and/or the private sector to revitalize their communities.
Establishing new policies that make it easier, cheaper or faster for leaders to revitalize communities
Aligning state policy with local needs and action
Attracting private sector interest and investment to neighborhoods and cities that are beginning to backslide or have experienced disinvestment
To champion revitalization we
write research reports, analyses and white papers that are used by state and local policy makers, reporters, local nonprofits and the private sector.
We advocate for pragmatic policies at the statehouse and with executive offices
We offer advice to local officials and often act as a liaison between local stakeholders and state policymakers
We conduct local pilot or demonstrations projects in individual neighborhoods or cities to test the efficacy and value of proposed policy reforms
adding nearly 60 million people to the populace by 2040)
Looking from a county perspective :
Ohioans aged 55+ comprise over 25% of state’s population but comprise 30%+ in many eastern and rural counties
BROWN/GREEN Map: (lighter the county, the fewer 55+)
BLUE/WHITE MAP: (darker the county, greater the expected population growth)
Ohio’s population growth will not be evenly distributed
why we are concerned with land consumption and usage:
More land consumption with the same number of residents means that our economic activity dissipates and that the cost of supporting that developed land increases for all taxpayers, including businesses.
Costs of land development include new roads, new sewer and water lines, the lost cost of agricultural production, the lost cost of worker productivity due to increased commuting times, and the increased public health costs the can occur if people are not living in an environment that supports active lifestyles. The cost of sprawl is felt especially heavily by cities which is where many of our facilities remain and have been the longest in operation
In major urban counties, suburban population has more or less flatlined.
Suburban population has increased but not hugely
But with the exception of Cuyahoga Co, population has increased over time in the suburbs
The more diverse a community, the more welcoming it is perceived by people of color and immigrants. For future population growth and economic growth, Ohio will have to rely on people moving in.
Immigrants and younger people have different expectations of their communities that what the community was previously used to:
Walkable
High quality transit
Nationally, millennials surpassed Baby Boomers in raw numbers in 2013
The cities and small towns that made Ohio strong in the 20th century have become the metropolitan regions that will power the state in the 21st century.
In 2010 we found:
81% of all Ohioans live in one of the state’s 16 metropolitan areas
These metros hold:
84% of the state’s jobs
Produce 87% of the state GDP
These numbers have likely increased in the 4 years since we completed the study.
Ohio is a state of metros. That’s the reality
insight2050 is a collaborative initiative among MORPC, Columbus 2020, ULI Columbus, and a stakeholder committee consisting of public and private partners. The initiative aims to help Central Ohio communities proactively plan for development and population growth over the next 30+ years, which is expected to be dramatically different from the past.
The first phase of insight2050 is a regional analysis that provides data for decision makers to understand the impact of future land use policies on specific factors influencing the region’s quality of life. The Scenario Results Report is now available online at www.getinsight2050.org.
The regional growth scenarios that reflect different types of development patterns were informed by the latest data and projections and then compared utilizing a variety of metrics, such as land consumption, infrastructure costs, air pollution, household expenses for transportation and utilities, as well as public health and safety costs, to arrive at an assessment of their relative impacts.
Too much is at risk with going it alone. There are more benefits to working together than solo
Economic benefits of collaboration outweigh ‘going it alone”
Organically happening at the local level
State is encouraging shared services
This is the future
To Sum up:
Townships, especially suburban and ex-urban townships have received many of the residents that moved out of the county’s or metro’s largest city,
but new market trends suggest that a renewed interest for urban and urban-esque amenities and living
SGA study
Looked at 17 studies from across the county that compared sustainable growth development with conventional suburban development
DEFINITION OF TERMS
SG Development:
buildings located closer to each other;
more walkable neighborhoods;
streets with better connections among destinations;
a greater mix of home types;
more transportation options.
Conventional Suburban Development:
siting buildings farther away from each other;
designing neighborhoods primarily for driving;
creating a less-connected street system with longer distances between destinations;
providing fewer public transportation options.
SGA’s survey concluded that smart growth development saves an average of 38 percent on upfront costs for new construction of roads, sewers, water lines and other infrastructure.
Many studies have concluded that this number is as high as 50 percent.
Amend public nuisance statute
Make it harder to scrap metal from residential properties
Increase recordation of responsible party contact information for real estate recordings to cut down