1. March 2009Bill Meyer
William (Bill) Meyer -
B.E. (Civil) Hons., MBA.
Modularization
Director Project Execution Development
Foster Wheeler USA Corporation
Houston, Texas.
Ph. +1 713 929 8089
2. March 2009Bill Meyer
Project Costs
Factors we can influence / manage
Engineering Procurement Construction
Factors driven by market forces
~10% ~45% ~45%
Manhour
Cost $
Manhours Material
Quantities
Manhours
Material
Prices
Manhour
Cost $
Total
EPC
Cost $
3. March 2009Bill Meyer
THERE ARE MANY WAYS TO MOVE MANHOURS OFFSITE:
MODULARIZATION
Module is defined as
Minor or major section of a plant
Modularization
4. March 2009Bill Meyer
Defintion of a MODULE
Minor or major section of a
plant
Fabricated and assembled
offsite
Modularization
5. March 2009Bill Meyer
Defintion of a MODULE
Minor or major section of a
plant
Fabricated and assembled
offsite
Comprised of complete or
partial systems
Modularization
6. March 2009Bill Meyer
Defintion of a MODULE
Minor or major section of a
plant
Fabricated and assembled
offsite
Comprised of complete or
partial systems
Complete
(within practical limitations)
inside module boundaries
Modularization
7. March 2009Bill Meyer
Other Methods of Moving Manhours Offsite or to a More Productive
Environment
Preassembly –partial assembly of typically multi-craft components into an
assembly
Modularization
8. March 2009Bill Meyer
Other Methods of Moving Manhours Offsite or to a More Productive
Environment
Prefabrication – fabrication of typically single-craft components into a
fabricated item.
Modularization
9. March 2009Bill Meyer
Modularization
1. Decision making process for modular execution
2. Economic evaluation
3. Optimizing proportion of man-hours to move offsite
4. Engineering and Procurement implications
5. Module Fabrication
6. Critical success factors
10. March 2009Bill Meyer
Decision Timing for Modularization
Modularization
Project
Phase
FEL 1
Conceptual FEL 2
Assess FEL 3
Define
Execution FEL 5
Evaluation
FEL 4
Evaluate Module Options
Modular Execution Decision
15. March 2009Bill Meyer
Site Survey includes
• Labor
availability, productivity, quality,
craft availability, cost, other projects
in area, union impacts, regional /
political issues
Modularization Decision
17. March 2009Bill Meyer
Site Survey includes
• Labor
• Weather impacts
• Logistics
on site and to site, from fabrication
yard, cost and technical capabilities,
laydown areas
Modularization Decision
18. March 2009Bill Meyer
Site access restrictions can limit size of modules that can be
delivered to site
Modularization Decision
36. March 2009Bill Meyer
Modularization Execution Benefits:
1. Cost reductions
2. Schedule reductions
3. Risk reductions – 2 shifts possible, less impact on local craft, quality
enhancements, etc
Modularization Economics
37. March 2009Bill Meyer
Modularization Execution Benefits:
1. Cost reductions
2. Schedule reductions
3. Risk reductions – 2 shifts possible, less impact on local craft, quality
enhancements, etc
4. Safety – shop conditions, less working at height, less congestion, less
plant traffic
Modularization Economics
38. March 2009Bill Meyer
Modularization Execution Benefits:
1. Cost reductions
2. Schedule reductions
3. Risk reductions – 2 shifts possible, less impact on local craft, quality
enhancements, etc
4. Safety – shop conditions, less working at height, less congestion, less
plant traffic
5. Quality – controlled conditions, permanent established workforce and
skilled workers
Modularization Economics
39. March 2009Bill Meyer
Modularization Execution Benefits:
1. Cost reductions
2. Schedule reductions
3. Risk reductions – 2 shifts possible, less impact on local craft, quality
enhancements, etc
4. Safety – shop conditions, less working at height, less congestion, less
plant traffic
5. Quality – controlled conditions, permanent established workforce and
skilled workers
6. Reduced manpower on site
Modularization Economics
40. March 2009Bill Meyer
Modularization Execution Benefits:
1. Cost reductions
2. Schedule reductions
3. Risk reductions – 2 shifts possible, less impact on local craft, quality
enhancements, etc
4. Safety – shop conditions, less working at height, less congestion, less
plant traffic
5. Quality – controlled conditions, permanent established workforce and
skilled workers
6. Reduced manpower on site
7. Higher productivity – Nomex, Permits
Modularization Economics
41. March 2009Bill Meyer
Modularization Execution Benefits:
1. Cost reductions
2. Schedule reductions
3. Risk reductions – 2 shifts possible, less impact on local craft, quality
enhancements, etc
4. Safety – shop conditions, less working at height, less congestion, less
plant traffic
5. Quality – controlled conditions, permanent established workforce and
skilled workers
6. Reduced manpower on site
7. Higher productivity – Nomex, Permits
8. Etc.
Modularization Economics
42. March 2009Bill Meyer
Cost Downside
Increased cost of steel
Increased cost of shipping
Potentially - increased cost of transport and installation
Modularization Economics
43. March 2009Bill Meyer
Cost Downside
Increased cost of steel
Increased cost of shipping
Potentially - increased cost of transport and installation
Modularization Economics
44. March 2009Bill Meyer
Cost Downside
Increased cost of steel
Increased cost of shipping
Potentially - increased cost of transport and installation
Increased cost of engineering
Modularization Economics
45. March 2009Bill Meyer
Cost Upside
Move labor cost offsite to cheaper labor supply
Reduce indirect costs (construction supervision, consumables etc)
Improved productivity (weather, flexible workforce, site accessability etc)
Reduced schedule reduces construction indirects
[Positive impact to NPV if revenue stream begins earlier]
Modularization Economics
46. March 2009Bill Meyer
33 Month Schedule 3 million man hour
-
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33
months
Site Prep Civil Structural / Mech / Equip Piping E & I Indirects
Modularization Economics
Stickbuilt manhous
47. March 2009Bill Meyer
Modularization Economics
33 Month Schedule 3 million man hour
Module manhours removed offsite
-
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33
months
Site Prep Civil Structural / Mech / Equip Piping E & I Indirects
Residual manhous after module manhours moved offsite
48. March 2009Bill Meyer
33 Month Schedule 3 million man hour
-
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33
months
Site Prep Civil Structural / Mech / Equip Piping E & I Indirects
Estimate of % of ME&I hours that can be moved offsite in modules subtracted
from site hours
33 Month Schedule 3 million man hour
Module manhours removed offsite
-
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33
months
Site Prep Civil Structural / Mech / Equip Piping E & I Indirects
Modularization Economics
50. March 2009Bill Meyer
Cost Benefits
Economic Productivity Factor using Far East Yards
On-site Off-site
Labour Productivity 2.20 3.5
Composite Manhour cost $105.00 $12.10
Relative manhour cost c/w Gulf Coast $231.00 $42.35
Economic productivity ratio 5.45 : 1
Modularization Economics
51. March 2009Bill Meyer
MODULE vs STICK COST DIFFERENTIALS
Modular versus Stick built costs
$0.0
$10.0
$20.0
$30.0
$40.0
$50.0
$60.0
$70.0
$80.0
$90.0
$100.0
Modular Cost Stick built Cost
Installation cost Δ
Shipping cost Δ
Const. Mngmt cost Δ
Foundation cost Δ
Steel cost Δ
Engineering cost Δ
Camp cost Δ
labor cost
Savings
Millions$
Existing Project Data
(Note – All projects have different cost drivers )
Modularization Economics
52. March 2009Bill Meyer
Modular versus Stick built costs
$0.0
$20.0
$40.0
$60.0
$80.0
$100.0
$120.0
$140.0
Modular Cost Stick built Cost
Installation cost Δ
Shipping cost Δ
Steel cost Δ
Engineering cost Δ
Camp cost Δ
Labour cost
Modular versus Stick built costs
Modular Cost Stick built Cost
Installation cost Δ
Shipping cost Δ
Steel cost Δ
Engineering cost Δ
Camp cost Δ
Labour cost
Modular versus Stick built costs
Modular Cost Stick built Cost
Installation cost Δ
Shipping cost Δ
Steel cost Δ
Engineering cost Δ
Camp cost Δ
Labour cost
COST DRIVEN MODULAR
PROJECT
SCHEDULE DRIVEN
MODULAR PROJECT
COST DRIVEN STICK BUILT
PROJECT
Modularization Economics
53. March 2009Bill Meyer
Modularization
1. Decision making process for modular execution
2. Economic evaluation
3. Optimizing proportion of man-hours to move offsite
4. Engineering and Procurement implications
5. Module Fabrication
6. Critical success factors
61. March 2009Bill Meyer
Steam turbine generators already
manufactured but VPU’s anticipated
around machines and lube oil skids.
Otherwise powergen area
predominately ‘stick built’.
Switch Room
modularised as
PAB.
Current piperack could be adapted
to suit modularisation. Currently
envisaged as 29 PAR’s as marked.
Deaerator structure to be
supplied as complete PAU.
Option to include pumps on
module or in hook-up scope.
Boiler manufactured and
understood to contain some
preassembly. Potential to
modularise burner and economiser
area.
Liquor tank could be
modularised to include
extensive piping and
pumping duties.
Potential to combine demin and
injection areas into a single VPU
or PAU module.
Piperack along water pumps
currently marked-up as PAR
modules. Could possibly be
combined with pumps and
supplied as 2-3 PAU
modules
Unit 350 - Steam and Power Plant
Proposal for Modularisation with Minimum Re-engineering
Stack / steelwork
supplied as a
preassembled VPU with
lower level PAS support.
Unexposed stack lifted
and welded after.
Potential to
modularise diesel /
HFO areas.
Scrubbers pre-dressed as
VPU’s or prior to lift if
already manufactured.
64. March 2009Bill Meyer
Modularization
1. Decision making process for modular execution
2. Economic evaluation
3. Optimizing proportion of man-hours to move offsite
4. Engineering and Procurement implications
5. Module Fabrication
6. Critical success factors
66. March 2009Bill Meyer
Modular
Stick Built
Schedule Comparison – Modular vs Stick Built
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36
Duration - Months
Progress%
Order Placement Engineering Construction
Order Placement Engineering Construction
E & P Impacts
67. March 2009Bill Meyer
Module size constraints
Smaller modules require careful design for operator access
PDS modelling of modules enhances operator review and is
powerful tool for module fabrication
E & P Impacts
69. March 2009Bill Meyer
Module Types
1. Pre – Assembled Units (PAU’s)
Multi disciplined modules including:
- tagged and non tagged items, steel, piping, electrical,
instrumentation, fireproofing, insulation
81. March 2009Bill Meyer
E & P Impacts
Piping design file layout
Link files for pipe
stressing
Split files for quantity
takeoff and procurement
82. March 2009Bill Meyer
Differences can include
Location of pumps
PAR
02/03
PAR
04/05
PAU 01
PAU 02
PAU 03 PAU 05
VAU 02
etail above
Modular
Stick built
E & P Impacts
85. March 2009Bill Meyer
Differences can include
Pipe track to pipe rack
Additional clearance can be provided
where required
E & P Impacts
86. March 2009Bill Meyer
E & P Impacts
Site based Loads, Clearances and Critical Dimensions
Crane loads
Module clearances
Crane clearances
Foundations to
leave low
etc
101. March 2009Bill Meyer
E & P Impacts
Procurement Complexity
Number of delivery
locations impact
ordering and material
tracking
Equipment
Deliveries
Material Logistics for the
Stick-Built Project
Install
Dock
Truck
102. March 2009Bill Meyer
E & P Impacts
Procurement Complexity
Truck
Material
yard
Dock
Transport
Install
Material Logistics for the
modularized Project
Truck
Truck
Install
Module Fabrication
Yard
Equipment
Deliveries
Port
Module
Deliveries
Loadout
to ship
Bulk Materials and
minor equipment
Modules and
major equipment