SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 8
Download to read offline
May 2007




IWRM National dialogue in Poland                                                                                            Calendar of Events
THE NATIONAL DIALOGUE WAS HELD ON NO-            ter management to overcome potential con-                                  National IWRM Dialogue in Slovenia
VEMBER 14, 2006 IN WARSAW BASED MI-              flicts of interest among them.                                              April 22, 2007
NISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT.                                                                                                      Ljubljana, Slovenia
                                                 During the discussion with participation of
                                                 Mr. Gajda who was answering several ques-                                  National IWRM Dialogue in Romania
                                                 tions, the principal issue was how to over-
                                                                                                                            April 25, 2007
                                                 come potential conflicts of interest between
                                                                                                                            Bucharest, Romania
                                                 different agencies and authorities involved in
The seminar was opened by the chair of GWP       water management. It’s clear that not all of
Poland, Prof. Janusz Kindler who welcomed        them will greet with enthusiasm the changes                                National IWRM Dialogue in Estonia
Mr. Mariusz Gajda, the new Chairman of the       considered in the proposal presented. The se-                              May 9, 2007
National Water Management Administration.        cond presentation was “Droughts in Poland”                                 Tallinn, Estonia
The new administrative body, working under       concentrating on severe drought that occur-
Ministry of Environment, was established ac-     red in the summer of 2006. The final presen-                                National IWRM Dialogue in Moldova
cording to updated Polish Water Law on July 1,   tation was under the title “Implementation                                 May 14-16, 2007
2006. In Poland, the Ministry of Environment     of EU Water Framework Directive in Poland                                  Chisinau, Moldova
deals with water management policy and the       - conditions for success”. The dialogue, hos-
strategy.                                        ted by GWP Poland, provided an opportunity                                 National IWRM Dialogue in Czech Republic
                                                 to discuss openly all difficult issues and dif-                             May 15-16, 2007
Mr. Gajda presented his paper “New gover-        ferent opinions.
                                                                                                                            Medlov, Czech Republic
nance arrangements for water management
in Poland” which describes new proposal on       More than 80 practitioners from all around
                                                                                                                            National IWRM Dialogue in Hungary, phase II
how to overcome the institutional fragmen-       the country attended the dialogue. In addition
tation of water management in the country        to regular GWP Poland partners, the venue at-                              May 31, 2007
between state government and the self-go-        tracted several newcomers as the topic of wa-                              Szabadkigyos, Hungary
vernment authorities at the local, county and    ter management planning is currently on the
provincial levels. The keynote presentation      top agenda in Poland. Based on demands of                                  National IWRM Dialogue in Slovakia
was followed by a lively discussion. It came     the participants, two more national dialogues                              June 18, 2007
up that the success of water management          are slated for early 2007. For more information,                           Bratislava, Slovakia
planning largely depends on the will of diffe-   please contact Dr. Janusz Kindler, GWP Poland
rent agencies and authorities involved in wa-    Chair, e-mail: janusz.kindler@is.pw.edu.pl.                                International Tool Box seminar
                                                                                                                            August 30-31, 2007
                                                                                                    CREDIT: EWA SKUPISNKA




                                                                                                                            Nyiregyháza, Hungary

                                                                                                                            First GWP CACENA, CEE and MED
                                                                                                                            Inter-regional Partners Meeting
                                                                                                                            Addressing EU Neighbourhood Policy from
                                                                                                                            a water resources management perspec-
                                                                                                                            tive
                                                                                                                            October 6-7, 2007
                                                                                                                            Varna, Bulgaria

                                                                                                                            GWP CEE Regional Council Meeting
                                                                                                                            October 8-9, 2007
                                                                                                                            Varna, Bulgaria

                                                                                                                            6th IWA Conference on Wastewater Recla-
                                                                                                                            mation and Reuse for Sustainability
                                                                                                                            October 9-12, 2007
2nd phase of the national dialogue in Poland
                                                                                                                            Antwerp, Belgium
Interview with Lucia Ana Varga, State Secretary, Romanian
Ministry of the Environment and Sustainable Development
IN CONTINUATION OF OUR SERIES OF INTER-
VIEWS WITH THE MINISTERS OF THE ENVIRON-
MENT FROM THE 11 CENTRAL AND EASTERN EU-
ROPEAN COUNTRIES, WHICH ARE PART OF GWP
CEE REGION, WE BRING YOU THE INTERVIEW
WITH STATE SECRETARY OF ROMANIAN MINIS-
TRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT, LUCIA ANA VARGA.

State Secretary Lucia Ana Varga studied me-
chanics at the Technical University of Timi-
soara from 1986 to 1991. In 2001 she became
a mechanical engineering candidate for a doc-
tor’s degree at the Faculty of Mechanics at the
same university. From 1991 to 1998, Ms. Var-
ga was a school teacher in Oradea. Afterwards
she worked for the Bihor County Commissari-
at of the National Environmental Guard as an
inspector and chief commissioner until 2005,
when she was appointed State Secretary at the
Ministry of the Environment and Water Man-
agement. During her ministerial career to date,
Ms. Varga was elected President of the Bureau        the resource - water demand equation and the           nating the unitary implementation of actions
of the Meeting of the Parties on the Protocol on     fact that water resource protection requires use       and measures for the prevention and manage-
Water and Health to the 1992 Convention on           analysis at the river basin level;                     ment of specific emergency situations on the
the Protection and Use of Transboundary Wa-          ● the integration of flood defense issues with          national level;
tercourses and International Lakes (2007). In        aspects regarding conservation and the devel-          ● Directorate for Water Resource Manage-

January 2007, she took over the Presidency of        opment of aquatic biodiversity;                        ment, with responsibilities concerning quanti-
the International Commission for the Protec-         ● the integration of water resources in planning       tative and qualitative water management and
tion of the Danube River (ICPDR) for one year.       policies, taking into account the fact that water is   especially concerning European Union aspects,
Between 1998 and 2006, she graduated from            one of the basic elements of life and at the same      the implementation of bilateral and multilateral
various training courses and seminars on the         time a factor which determines socio-economic          agreements in the water field and coordination
environment, law, communications and public          development, is often a limiting factor.               of the activities of the transboundary river basin
relations, security and national defense – secu-     In the water field, Romania has successfully            districts;
rity and good governance and internal auditors.      managed to cope with nearly all of these IWRM          ● Directorate for Dam Safety and Water Ca-

She speaks English fluently. Ms. Varga is mem-        requirements through both the management               dastre, with responsibilities for regulating the
ber of the Liberal National Party.                   system and the undertaken and foreseen activi-         operational regime of water resources and res-
                                                     ties aiming to obtain sustainable water devel-         ervoirs and regulations on dam safety exploita-
1. Water Talk: GWP defines Integrated Water           opment.                                                tion, organization, recording and management
Resources Management (IWRM) as a proc-               In this sense, at the national level, the Minis-       of the Water Cadastre of Romania;
ess which promotes the coordinated devel-            try of the Environment and Water Management            ● State Water Inspection with the main re-

opment and management of water, land and             carries out the policy in the environment and          sponsibility for the supervision of the legisla-
related resources, in order to maximize the          water management fields, the strategy and spe-          tion implementation in water field, harmonized
resultant economic and social welfare in an          cific regulations for the development and har-          with the provisions of the EU water directives.
equitable manner without compromising the            monization of those activities within the gener-       The implementation of the national policy and
sustainability of vital ecosystems. How do           al government policy, ensures and coordinates          strategy in water management, developed by
you see the challenges of IWRM implemen-             the application of the Governmental strate-            the Ministry is carried out by the “Apele Ro-
tation in practice in Romania?                       gy within the respective fields of activity, thus       mane” National Administration, which is or-
As it was mentioned, the concept of Integrated       achieving the role of state authority, synthesis,      ganized on the basin level (11 river basins).
Water Resources Management implies:                  coordination and control. The Water Depart-            Its responsibilities are related to quantitative,
● the integration of all water categories: sur-      ment covers the full area of activities related to     qualitative water monitoring, regulation of wa-
face water, groundwater, transitional water and      water including the following Directorates:            ter resources use as well as the implementation
coastal water as well as quantitative, qualitative   ● Directorate for the Prevention and Manage-           of water management legislation, harmonized
and biological issues of water;                      ment of Emergency Situations, with responsi-           with the EU water directives.
● the integration of water use at the river ba-      bilities concerning flood protection and control        But sustainable water development is not only
sin level, which reveals the need for solving of     and hydro-meteorological emergencies, coordi-          carried out through activities and technical, in-




 2
stitutional and legislative measures but also           The estimated costs for the implementation of                 The main potential beneficiaries of the Struc-
through the promotion of the participation of all       Drinking Water Directive 98/83/EC are 5.6 mil-                tural and Cohesion Funds within the frame-
involved actors, as consultative partners in the        lion euros, which are needed up to 2015 for:                  work of SOP are the local public authorities
decision making process. In order to create the         ● country-wide monitoring of drinking water                   that at present are beneficiaries of Phare, ISPA
mechanisms of consultation on all levels, such          quality – new analytical equipment;                           and other international funds. The preparato-
as local collectivities, water users within the river   ● investment in equipment for control moni-                   ry activities for Structural and Cohesion Funds,
basins and water management services benefi-             toring performed by the producers;                            which are time consuming for major projects,
ciaries; the Basin Committees were established          ● improvement of technologies and extension                   started at the beginning of 2004. Pre-accession
through Water Law No. 107/1996 with amend-              of water treatment;                                           funds, external grants and bilateral agreements
ments. These Basin Committees are organized on          ● rehabilitation and extension of the water                   have been largely used to develop feasibility
the territorial level within the Water Directorates     supply networks;                                              studies and other back-up documents and also
of “Apele Romane”, as consultative organisms,           ● replacement of the domestic distribution                    to support the activities aimed at improving in-
underlining the concern of the Ministry of the          systems.                                                      stitutional governing with a view to increasing
Environment and Water Management for sus-               The fact that the investments in the water infra-             the role of local authorities in project imple-
taining the public participation process. The cre-      structure are costly is a reality, but it is also true        mentation, tendering and contracting.
ation of these structures lay at the heart of the       that they are absolutely necessary. Within the                The providing of grants to the water sector is
following main objectives: involvement within           strategic approach of the water infrastructure                conditioned on the creation of Regional Water
the decision-making activities of the local ben-        projects, Romania has foreseen a long term per-               Companies (regional operators). The regionali-
eficiaries and efficient cooperation between local        spective of the development of the work, taking               zation process is essential because in order to
water management bodies and local public ad-            into consideration both the size of the human                 implement the environmental aquis require-
ministration authorities in order to maintain the       agglomerations which generate a huge volume                   ments, experienced water companies that can
balance of water resource conservation and their        of waste water and the financial efforts involved              make proper investments and guarantee the
sustainable development.                                in arranging investments in this field. The de-                functioning quality of the facilities built are
                                                        velopment, in time, of the financial efforts al-               needed. Without grants, most of the small opera-
2. Water talk: Implementation of EU legis-              lows for sustainable development of the projects,             tors will not be able to comply with the aquis.
lation for the new members, which entered               which takes into consideration acceptance, both               Therefore, there is a strong motivation for dif-
the EU at the beginning of 2007, means an               of the population and involved institutions.                  ferent operators to associate in regional water
opportunity for improving the environmen-               Therefore Romania has developed a strategic                   companies with a view to overcoming poten-
tal infrastructure with co-financing from EU             document titled the Sectoral Operational Pro-                 tial administrative problems. By promoting in-
funds. To which measures in the area of wa-             gram for the Environment (SOP) that covers the                tegrated water and waste water systems within
ter protection, management and use is the               period from 2007 to 2013 and supports the ful-                a regional approach, Romania aims to maximize
support from Structural Funds and the Co-               fillment of Romania’s obligations in the envi-                 cost efficiency. Thus, communities from clearly
hesion Fund for the programming period                  ronmental field, while offering investment op-                 defined areas (for example from a river basin)
2007 – 2013 directed and who might bene-                portunities across the country. The SOP strategy              are encouraged to join together and develop
fit from that support? How much funding                  focuses on collective investments and services                a common long term investment program for
is needed for improving and developing the              necessary to raise long term competitiveness,                 water sector development (Master Plan for wa-
environmental water infrastructure in the               create new jobs and obtain sustainable devel-                 ter/waste water).
near future?                                            opment. During the mentioned period, for all                  Due to the significant investment needed in the
Due to the investment needs in water and                of the investments in the environmental sec-                  water infrastructure, within the process of our
waste water infrastructure – which are eval-            tor, Romania is counting on a contribution of                 EU/IWRM implementation, additional financing
uated at almost 15 billion euros – in order to          4.5 billion euros from Structural and Cohesion                sources have been foreseen. They include:
comply with European legislation, Romania has           Funds, an amount that is far below the needs                  ● The National Program for Rural Develop-

requested a longer period of transition (during         estimated for the same period.                                ment, co-financed by the EU for 2007-2013 co-
the negotiations with the European Commis-              One of the main objectives of the SOP is the im-              ordinated by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forests
sion) than other recent member states, which            provement of water quality and access to wa-                  and Rural Development that includes water in-
can allow for the achievement of the invest-            ter and the waste water infrastructure based on               frastructure investments within the rural areas;
ment efforts needed.                                    providing water and water sewerage systems in                 ● The Governmental Program for Infrastructure

The Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive 91/            urban areas up to 2015. The SOP continues the                 Development in Rural Zones for 2006 – 2008;
271/EEC: implementation requires necessary in-          environmental infrastructure development pro-                 ● The National Environmental Fund, for co-fi-

vestments of 9.5 billion euros (5.7 billion euros       grams at the national level that have been initi-             nancing;
for the water treatment plants and 3.8 billion eu-      ated within the framework of the pre-accession                ● External funds and different forms of Public

ros for water sewerage systems) up to 2018 for:         assistance, specifically Phare and ISPA.                       Private Partnerships.
● construction of new urban waste water treat-          SOP’s priority regarding the extension and mod-
ment plants;                                            ernization of the water supply and sewerage                   3. Water talk: WFD is the most complex set
● up-grading of existing urban waste water              systems will be financed through the Cohesion                  of goals, tools and commitments in the EU
treatment plants;                                       Fund; the financial planning is presented below:               water-sector to date. Two of the main WFD
● up-grading of existing waste water treat-

ment plants in the agro-food industry;                                           EC financing (Euro) National financing (Euro)         Total (Euro)   Co-financing rate
● rehabilitation of existing urban sewage col-
                                                          Improvement of the
lecting systems;
                                                             water supply           2,776,532,160                489,976,263        3,266,508,423         85%
● construction and/or extension of urban sew-
                                                         and sewerage systems
age collecting systems.




                                                                                                                                                                3
goals are the protection and improvement of         monized Körös/Crisuri river basin management          gen and 66% of the total phosphorous flow-
the quality of water ecosystems and sustain-        plan in a participative process (French technical     ing in dissolved form into the Black Sea come
able, balanced and equitable water use. This        and financial support under the coordination of        from the Danube river basin. More than half of
directive provides broad opportunities for          ICPDR) with the following expected results:           all nutrient loads in the Danube River originate
public participation in river basin manage-         ● Strengthening Hungarian and Romanian co-            from agriculture; about one fourth from private
ment and is transposed into Romanian legi-          operation between transboundary organiza-             households and about 10 - 13% from industry.
slation. How can the participation of water         tions in charge of water management including         Romania is the largest contributor of nutrients
stakeholders, the public and NGO’s, be en-          public participation;                                 to the Black Sea as its entire territory drains into
sured during the implementation of this di-         ● Enhancing stakeholder consultation and pre-         the Black Sea.
rective and especially in preparation of the        paring a pilot joint public consultation project      Taking into account the above mentioned facts
river basin management plans which must be          based on a timetable and a WFD work pro-              and also the necessity to comply with EU re-
completed by 2009? What do you think?               gramme and the main issue in the Körös/Crisuri        quirements regarding the mitigation of nitrate
The implementation of WFD requires the co-or-       basin (as a pilot project for the Tisa basin/region   pollution, the Ministry of the Environment and
dination of the all involved parties at the na-     consultation) – on going.                             Water Management has developed the Imple-
tional and river basin levels. One of the main      3.“Clean Crisuri” pilot basin project (based on       mentation Plan of Nitrates Directive and Action
components of the development of the river ba-      two education strategies developed by MoEWM           Programs for vulnerable areas. Furthermore, the
sin management plans is the public information      for children and adults) – on going - that aims       Ministry with the support of the World Bank,
and consultation process. In order to facilitate    at informing people and raising their involve-        has carried out the Agricultural Pollution Con-
this process and to comply with the provisions      ment in elaborating the water protection and          trol Project which is aimed at significantly in-
of the Water Framework Directive, the Minis-        management strategies through:                        creasing the use of environment friendly agri-
try of the Environment and Water Management         ● questionnaires;                                     cultural and household practices in rural areas
has promoted two ministerial orders for the ap-     ● printed information/education booklets/leaf-        in order to ultimately reduce the discharge of
proval of:                                          lets;                                                 nutrients and other agricultural pollutants
● Procedures for public consultation in the de-     ● web site (www.crisuricurate.go.ro)                  into the Danube River and Black Sea through
cision making process related to water man-         ● public meetings;                                    integrated land and water management. The
agement (Ministerial Order no. 1044/27 October      ● education/awareness campaigns.                      achievements of the project include:
2005);                                              Other achievements aimed at public involve-           ● Development and implementation of manure
● Procedures for public information access re-      ment and awareness performed by the Minis-            management plans;
lated to water management (Ministerial Order        try of Environment and Water Management               ● Development, revision and dissemination of

no. 1012/19 October 2005).                          (MoEWM) are:                                          the Code for Good Agricultural Practice;
Also the River Basin Committees provide the         ● two communication strategy (for kids and            ● Development of standard action programs

framework for public consultation and partici-      adults ) which have been disseminated at the          for vulnerable plain areas;
pation, including the management plans for all      national level, as a framework for local activi-      ● Realization of local, regional and national

11 river basins elaborated according to the WFD.    ties (depending on the local situation);              public awareness campaigns;
Each committee includes 15 members: water           ● 2007 Communication Plan of the MoEWM;               ● Testing and proving of ecological agriculture

management bodies, representatives of central       ● MoEWM website – an important and cost ef-           practice within the vulnerable areas.
and local authorities, representatives of prefec-   ficient tool/“Kids Corner” – ecological education      In 2006, implementation at the national level
tures and county councils, users (industry, agri-   for children (based on the idea that children are     was approved. The extended project amounts to
culture, localities) and NGO’s. All of these mem-   excellent conveyors of the message);                  50 millions euros and has a view to realize the
bers are involved in the decision making process    ● national TV spots (2 weeks before the events        programs and plans established for the vulner-
in order to advise the national government, pro-    - on 3 channels of Romanian National Televi-          able areas identified on the Romania’s territory.
mote public participation concerning the river      sion) for celebrating: Danube Day (every year,
basin management process and to inform the          starting from 2004) and International Black Sea       5. Water talk: Global climate changes in the
other key stakeholders about public participa-      Day (starting from 2006 for public awareness          form of flash floods and heavy storms are
tion possibilities and structures.                  on the necessity of the protection and the con-       affecting all the countries in the region of
The following projects have been developed:         servation of the marine environment);                 Central and Eastern Europe. Which arrange-
1. Enhancing Access to Information and Pub-         ● two national campaigns in 2007 on raising           ments and measures, in your opinion, should
lic Participation in Environmental Decision-ma-     public awareness and informing people (1) and         be adopted in order to reduce the results of
king UNDP-GEF Danube Regional Project- Com-         (2) authorities/industries about the WFD provi-       this threat?
ponent 3.4 included as activities:                  sions.                                                The painful experience from 2005 and the
● Public Access to water management In-                                                                   spring of 2006 has shown that the old patterns
formation/Public Participation in the decision      4. Water talk: the implementation of EU Di-           are no longer valid under the new climate con-
making process in water management – a ma-          rectives will be an important factor in miti-         ditions and that the existing protection work as
nual for authorities which has been written es-     gating the agricultural impact on the envi-           designed is not effective because the environ-
pecially for those authorities not involved in      ronment; however, it is necessary to involve          mental conditions have changed dramatically.
water management issues; it was printed under       farmers in the practical realization of envi-         Also, developments undertaken in the last 50
the coordination of the Regional Environment        ronmental legislation. What kind of measu-            years have had a major influence on these dis-
Center and with the support of the Ministry of      res for mitigating impacts and enhancing              astrous floods and call for necessary solutions
the Environment and Water Management.               environmental benefits are applied in Ro-              for the rehabilitation of this situation. There-
● Elaboration of a brochure on the same topic       mania?                                                fore, Romania is in the process of reshaping and
for the public and NGO’s as target groups.          The Black Sea Environmental Program (BSEP)            updating existing water management plans and
2. Support for the future preparation of a har-     Studies revealed that 58% of the total nitro-         thus starting to develop a long term strategy for




 4
flood control. Romania has also initiated specif-          on the Danube will be done through a combina-            ● the development of research on the impact

ic activities in order to enhance its capacity to         tion of hydro-technical works and wetlands.              of the climate change on water quality.
tackle the problem of floods in particular and             The results of the research carried out on the           As a result, the project “Forward Integration of Flood
the dangerous meteorological phenomena in                 impact of climate change on water resources              Warning in Areas Prone to Flash Floods” funded by
general. As a result, the national meteorological         involve the consideration of the following as-           the WMO and implemented by the GWP – Romania
system has been modernized and the hydrolog-              pects that should be adopted in order to reduce          in partnership with the National Institute for Hy-
ical system is in the process of modernization.           the consequences of these threats:                       drology and Water Management, and which was of
In order to improve the intervention capacity,            ● development of new criteria and techniques             a great help to us through its educational materials
a large project concerning the improving of in-           for the designing of hydraulic structures to             in showing the ways of protecting of the population,
tervention capacity in the event of floods and             make water management systems more sensi-                goods and cultural values and the mitigation of the
accidental pollution is in the implementation             tive to the modifications of the hydrological re-         losses was carried out. As shown in the project re-
stage. This project has a total value of about 135        gime, due to the impact of climate variability           port, this was made possible through an ensemble
million euros and also deals with the improve-            and climate change;                                      of activities consisting of awareness, warning, pre-
ment of reservoir management, particularly in             ● elaboration of new procedures for the opera-           alarming and alarming, sheltering, evacuation and
flood and drought situations. Romania is also              tion of water management systems to take into            other technical and organizational measures which
developing a study concerning the “Ecological             consideration the uncertainty of the hydrologi-          the inhabitants are prepared how to use.
and economic re-sizing of the Romanian Dan-               cal regime evaluation, due especially to climate
ube Floodplain” based on which flood control               change;                                                  Water Talk: Thank you for the interview!



IWRM National Dialogue in Bulgaria
THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE “ECOLOGICAL ALTERNATIVES FOR INTE-                     In addition to the plenary sessions, there was also a poster session, group
GRATED WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT” WAS HELD IN ARBANASSI ON                         discussions and field visits to the villages of Varbitza and Draganovo (Gor-
NOVEMBER 23-25, 2006.                                                               na Oryahovitsa Municipality).

                                                                                    Conclusions
                                                                                    At the end of the conference, organizers summarized the results of the
                                                                                    group work discussions and field visits and made the following proposals
                                                                                    to the central and local authorities:
                                                                                    ● development and implementation of a pilot project for IWRM for small

                                                                                    settlements. The Gorna Oryahovitsa Municipality and District Government
In Bulgaria, national programs and strategies refer to the construction of a col-   would support such a project in the villages of Varbitza and Draganovo.
lecting system and WWTPs for agglomerations over 2000 people. All available         ● extension of the network of ecosan toilets in rural regions; schools

financial resources for the environment are expected to be directed precisely        should be given priority
towards these agglomerations. However, 4,765 settlements are currently not          ● development of cooperation and sponsorship for implementing IWRM

covered by these programs. They include approximately 1.8 million inhabitants,      and ecosanitation technologies
which makes up approximately 24 % of the population. At present, there is no        ● organization of regular forums with decision-makers and other stake-

single working sustainable sanitation system in the country.                        holders for supporting the implementation of IWRM and EcoSan
                                                                                    ● development of training materials for IWRM concepts and ecosan technolo-

To cover this gap, Bulgaria Water Partnership in cooperation with EcoSan-           gies for water engineers, vets, foresters, agronomists, etc. and for conducting
Res, Earth Forever, Women in Europe for a Common Future, the Institute of           training programs for university students, practitioners and other experts.
Water Problems-Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, the Regional Inspectorate             ● conducting research on the application of ecosan under different natu-

of the Environment, Water Veliko Tarnovo and the Yovkovtsi Water Supply             ral and socio-economic conditions in Bulgaria
& Sewerage Company organized this international conference in Arbanassi                                                                              M. Mochurova
on November 23-25, 2006.                                                                                                               Bulgaria Water Partnership
                                                                                                                                                                            CREDIT: GWP BULGARIA




The aim of this conference was to raise public awareness of water supply
and sanitation problems in small and dispersed communities. It also provided
guidance and coordination of actions for optimal ecological solutions for
wastewater collection and treatment according to IWRM principles.

In total, 44 participants from ministries, municipalities, river basin direc-
torates, science and research institutions and universities, NGOs took part.

Key note presentations were made by Peter Ridderstolpe (Sweden) – “Na-
tural System for Wastewater and Sludge Management with Focus on Small
Settlements in Cold Climates”; Nataliya Gudkova (Ukraine) – “MAMA-86’s
Experience in the Introduction of Dry Urine-Diverting Toilets in Ukraine”;
Diana Iskreva-Idigo (Bulgaria) “Pilot Ecosan in Rural Bulgaria” and Margriet
Samwel&Bistra Mihailova (Germany) “Women in Europe for Common Fu-
ture (WECF) Programme in region of Eastern Europe and Caucasus”.                     IWRM National Dialogue in Bulgaria




                                                                                                                                                                5
IWRM National dialogue in Hungary                                                                                        ing local people and the community is need-
                                                                                                                         ed. This will involve new institutional arrange-
                                                                                                                         ments. There must be a high level of autonomy,
THE NATIONAL DIALOGUE TOOK PART ON NO-                  Cities are dominant features in the catchments                   but this must at the same time be associated
VEMBER 13, 2006 IN BUDAPEST WITH A FOCUS                where they occur, and success in IUWM will                       with transparency and accountability for all de-
ON THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT AND IWRM.                      make important contributions to the theory and                   cisions.
                                                        practice of integrated catchment management                      ● At many levels in the process – even at the

                                                        and IWRM in the broader basin context.                           governmental level – stakeholders lack the
                                                                                                                         necessary knowledge and skills for full appli-
                                                        Taking this into account the Ministry for the En-                cation of IWRM. Community stakeholders may
                                                        vironment and Water together with GWP Hun-                       not be familiar with the concept of water re-
                                                        gary decided to organize a national meeting on                   source management, catchment management,
Urban space and IWRM                                    urban environment with special regard to Inte-                   corporate governance and their role in these.
Urban areas play an important role in delivering        grated Water Resource Management.                                ● Where specific areas of responsibility fall

the objectives of the EU Sustainable Develop-                                                                            outside the mandate of a single government
ment Strategy. In urban areas the environmen-           The national dialogue was held on November                       department, appropriate institutional arrange-
tal, economic and social dimensions meet most           13, 2006 with the participation of more than                     ments are required to ensure effective inter-
strongly. Cities are where many environmental           80 stakeholders from different fields such as                     departmental collaboration. Effective IWRM is
problems are concentrated, but they are also            local authorities, ministries, NGOs, universities,               a top-down-meets- bottom-up process.
the economic drivers, the places where business         regional institutions. The opening speech has                    ● The political will to achieve effective imple-

is done and investments are made. Four out of           been given by Miklós Persányi - Minister for                     mentation is indispensable on the part of those
five European citizens live in urban areas, and          the Environment and Water, followed by Gyula                     taking part - both in the public and private sec-
their quality of life is directly influenced by the      Hegyi - EP member. From GWP Hungary, Gyula                       tors.
state of the urban environment.                         Reich gave a presentation on IWRM and urban                      ● Policies must be meaningful – especially

                                                        environment.                                                     those regarding the poor and marginalized in
Most cities are confronted with a common core                                                                            developing countries.
set of environmental problems such as poor              Conclusions                                                      ● Water management must be prepared with

air quality, high levels of traffic and conges-          Lively discussions followed and among others,                    the full involvement of the stakeholders con-
tion, high levels of ambient noise, poor-quality        the following conclusions were drawn:                            cerned.
building environment, derelict land, greenhouse         ● IWRM should be applied at the catchment                        ● Monitoring of implementation and results is

gas emissions, urban sprawl and a generation of         level. The catchment is the smallest complete                    essential - with all stakeholders involved.
waste and waste-water.                                  hydrological unit of analysis and management.                    ● Successful communication includes report-
                                                        ● It is critical to integrate water and environ-                 ing to the public on results, as well as listening
Local authorities have a decisive role in improv-       mental management. This principle is widely                      to feedback.
ing the urban environment. The diversity in terms       and strongly supported. IWRM can be strength-                    The main “lesson learned” from this dialogue is
of history, geography, climate, administrative and      ened through the integration of Environmen-                      that more meetings and training sessions at the
legal conditions calls for locally developed, tailor-   tal Impact Assessments (EIA’s), water resource                   local level are needed to keep all stakeholders
made solutions for the urban environment. Ap-           modeling and land use planning.                                  better informed.
plication of the subsidiary principle, where action     ● Full participation by all stakeholders, includ-                                                   GWP Hungary
should be taken at the most effective level also



                                                                                                                                                                              CREDIT: MIKLOS KERESZTES
implies acting at the local level.

Many local authorities have expressed the need
for specific skills to adopt an integrated ap-
proach to management involving cross-sector
cooperation and training on specific environ-
mental legislation, effective public participation
and encouraging changes in citizens’ behavior.
‘Face to face’ training with the involvement of
national, regional and local authorities is re-
garded by stakeholders as the most valuable
learning method.

The fundamental premise is generally accept-
ed that IWRM should be applied at catchments
level, recognizing catchments or watersheds as
the basic hydrological unit of analysis and mana-
gement. At the implementation level, there is
a growing conviction that integrated urban wa-
ter management (IUWM) could be pursued as
a vital component of IWRM within the specific
problematic context of urban areas.                     Miklos Persanyi, the Minister of Environment, opened IWRM National Dialogue




 6
IWRM National dialogue in Ukraine                                                                    countries, such as France were expressed. The
                                                                                                       opinion that river basin authorities should be
                                                                                                       legislative bodies responsible for all aspects of
  THE UKRAINE WATER PARTNERSHIP (UWP)               society, i.e. the ministries of water resources    water management and the state of the river
  AND THE INTERAGENCY COORDINATING                  (State Committee), finance, economy, forestry,      was expressed by some RBOs and NGOs.
  GROUP FOR DEVELOPMENT OF WATER RE-                communal services, justice, the parliamentary
  SOURCES ORGANIZED THE NATIONAL IWRM               committee on the environment, the nine key         Representatives from the Ministries of Econo-
  DIALOGUE IN KIEV ON MARCH 16, 2007.               river basins (of which eight are transbound-       my and Finance together with parliamentary
                                                    ary) and the key NGOs (of rivers, environment      representatives gave valuable and construc-
                                                    and social sectors).                               tive comments on the way forward in imple-
                                                                                                       menting river basin management.
                                                    In Ukraine, amendments to the water code
                                                    are in preparation, and transition to the ba-      The meeting was concluded with the adoption
  Since 2002 the Ukrainian water sector has         sin management was proclaimed in 2002. To-         of a final resolution which will be presented
  been in the process of transition to the mana-    day the Dniestr river basin serves as a pilot      to the Deputy Prime Minister. Participants also
  gement within hydrographic (basin) bound-         basin for integrated river basin management.       adopted Joint Statement regarding their views
  aries. There are, however, different points of    The Dnepr, Donets, Western Bugh, Tisza and         on ways and means of IWRM implementation
  view regarding mandates, tasks, functions and     other river basins are also involved in this de-   in Ukraine. It was proposed that IWRM Imple-
  the organizational structure of the established   velopment.                                         mentation Strategy should become a part of
  River Basin Organizations (RBO).                                                                     the recently announced plans to develop new
                                                    The dialogue was distinguished by its in-          National Environmental Strategy and should
  The river basin management theme brought          volvement of river basin managers from re-         be included in the new program of coopera-
  together approximately 50 participants from       mote parts of Ukraine. Demands for capaci-         tion between EU and Ukraine.
  almost all relevant sectors and levels of the     ty building and learning from more advanced



World Wetlands Day – Danube wetland work ahead but not enough
DANUBE NGOS (NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS) ARE DOING                        be most important about wetlands. The result was that most found
GOOD PROJECTS THAT HELP PROTECT AND RESTORE VALUABLE WET-                     wetlands beneficial for habitat protection, flood control and recrea-
LANDS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN.                                              tional purposes (68%), but only 9% found them useful for nutrient
                                                                              pollution control.

                                                                              “The results prove that the case for using wetlands for nutrient pol-
                                                                              lution needs to be better promoted on Wetlands Day and every day,”
                                                                              says Whalley. To better encourage the importance of Danube wet-
                                                                              lands, the DRP is developing a guidance document for wetland mana-
                                                                              gers that includes case studies where wetlands have improved wa-
But more wetland projects are needed to make better use of wet-               ter quality.
lands as pollution removers, says Peter Whalley of the UNDP/GEF
Danube Regional Project (DRP).                                                The DRP has also funded numerous wetland pollution-reduction
                                                                              projects implemented by Danube NGOs. Examples include a project
‘Wetlands’ are places where water and land naturally cooperate to             in Veresegyház, Hungary where local NGO Tavirozsa restocked a lake
protect water, animals, plants and humans. Besides absorbing pol-             with original wetland plants and removed alien fish species that eat
lution, wetlands provide numerous other valuable services such as             wetland plants -- to reduce the lake’s nutrient pollution problem.
reducing the impacts from floods and providing homes for fish and
plant species.                                                                In Slovakia, the NGO BROZ cooperated with Slovak State Forests to
                                                                              introduce nature-oriented forestry in the 1,500 ha Rusovce flood-
Unfortunately, some 80% of the Danube Basin’s wetlands and flood-              plain near Bratislava. The new management will remove alien trees
plains have been lost due to past human activities over the last 150          and plant native tree species such as elm, oak and wild pear. In ad-
years, from river channelling to making room for more farmland.               dition, BROZ together with the State Nature Conservancy submitted
                                                                              proposals for three new protected wetland sites of nearly 1,400 ha
“Danube countries are missing an excellent opportunity to use wet-            along the Danube.
lands to reduce water pollution, especially from nutrients,” says Whal-
ley. Nutrient pollution is a serious problem in the Danube Basin and          In south Moravia, Czech Republic, local NGO Sagittaria prepared and
one that countries need to address before they can meet EU water leg-         helped implement a new local management plan to increase the ca-
islation, the ‘Water Framework Directive’, by 2015. “More attention to        pacity of a damaged fish pond. The goal was to naturally reduce ex-
wetlands should make meeting this law easier for Danube countries.”           cessive nutrient pollution from agriculture and communal sewage. A
                                                                              green buffer strip was set up, fish stocks improved, valuable wetland
A recent survey, funded through the DRP, asked wetland and wa-                plants were grown in a special lake enclosure and a public campaign
ter managers throughout the basin about what they perceived to                helped build local support.



                                                                                                                                                   7
Water training for international students in Bulgaria
FROM APRIL 11TH TO APRIL 24TH 2007 ENGREF-MONTPELLIER ORGANIZED                               a reasonable price for wastewater treatment, taking into account depreci-
A TRAINING PROGRAM FOR POST-GRADUATE STUDENTS IN BULGARIA.                                    ation costs. The study also gives short-term recommendations for operat-
                                                                                              ing the plant until a sufficient amount of pollution is reached.
ENGREF-Montpellier organized the training in association with the Bul-
garian Academy of Science, the Bulgaria Water Partnership, the Regional                       The second case study took place in rural Bulgaria in the Saedinenie Mu-
Inspectorate of the Environment and Water in Veliko Tarnovo and UBI-                          nicipality near Plovdiv. The first aspect was to carry out a technical and fi-
FRANCE-Bulgaria                                                                               nancial analysis of the water supply network, especially to propose some
                                                                                              improvements in the supply capacity and energetic yield when necessary




                                                                             CREDIT: ENGREF
                                                                                              and to draw up a long term financial sustainability analysis including de-
                                                                                              preciation costs. The study also proposed several scenarios to clarify the
                                                                                              role of the stakeholders. Furthermore, it presented their views on water
                                                                                              prices and opportunities to obtain state funding in the future.

                                                                                              The second aspects dealt with sanitation solutions for a village. The pur-
                                                                                              pose of the study was to give a methodological framework of different
                                                                                              solutions available to reduce the effect of domestic pollution in rural ar-
                                                                                              eas and to apply it to Dragomir, a village in the Saedinenie Municipality.
                                                                                              The proposed solution could be either individual such as dry toilets that
                                                                                              are rather cheap and can be implemented in the short-term, or collective,
                                                                                              such as a network and treatment plant with macrophyte reed bed filters,
                                                                                              a much more expensive solution but more convenient if tourist develop-
                                                                                              ment is being considered.

ENGREF team with GWP Consulting Partners in Veliko Tarnovo
                                                                                              The case studies were presented at the end of the two-week program in
In France, ENGREF-Montpellier is part of AgroParisTech (Institute of Tech-                    Sofia during the World Water Day celebrations. The students called for
nology for Life, Food and Environmental Sciences) and deals with post-                        a follow up of the training program in the future that could possibly in-
graduation training programs focused on technical and non-technical as-                       clude young Bulgarian professionals and GWP partners.
pects of water management.
                                                                                              Guillem Canneva
The students came from France, Moldova, Tunisia, China and Ireland. The                       canneva@Engref.Fr
program provided a unique opportunity to work on a real case study while
interacting with Bulgarian professionals, including GWP Bulgaria and their
partners.                                                                                      6th IWA Conference on Wastewater
The case studies                                                                               Reclamation and Reuse
The first case study was the Gorna Oriahovitsa wastewater treatment plant.
The treatment plant, financed by an EU grant (75%) and the Bulgarian gov-
                                                                                               for Sustainability
ernment (25%), was built to treat wastewater from 102, 000 people. It was                      THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL IWA SPECIALIST CONFERENCE ON WASTEWA-
put into operation in August 2006. Unfortunately, the incoming wastewa-                        TER RECLAMATION AND REUSE FOR SUSTAINABILITY (WRRS 2007) WILL
ter is far below what was expected and therefore the treatment plant is                        BE HELD IN ANTWERP (BELGIUM) ON 9TH-12TH OF OCTOBER, 2007.
not working properly. The students were asked to investigate the sources
of pollution, the operation of the treatment plant and the economic sus-                       Over the years, this biennial IWA water reuse conference has become
tainability of the project.                                                                    a major global platform to share best practice and discuss the latest de-
                                                                                               velopments in the field of sustainable reuse of municipal and industrial
The main results of this study was to recommend that the Gorna Oriaho-                         wastewater. An appointment not to miss by research institutions, com-
vitsa Sugar Factory be connected to the sewage network after installing                        panies and organisations active in this sector, both in developed and
a balancing tank, in order to increase the volume of incoming wastewa-                         developing countries.
ter to bring the treatment plant back to normal operation in the mid-term.
                                                                                               More information about the conference is available at www.wrrs2007.org.
Furthermore, waste water from the Sugar Factory could help maintain


                                                              Volume 7, Issue No. 1/2007, May 2007
                                                              Water Talk is the official newsletter of Global Water Partnership Central and Easter Europe (GWP CEE)
                                                              published twice a year. Water Talk assists GWP CEE to promote principles of Integrated Water Resourc-
                                                              es Management (IWRM) in the region of Central and Eastern Europe. The views and opinions expressed
                                                              in Water Talk do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of GWP CEE.
                                                              Publisher: GWP CEE - Global Water Partnership Central and Eastern Europe, gwpcee@shmu.sk,
                                                              Editor: Richard Müller, Language Proofreading: Euro VKM, Ltd, Layout and Printing: TYPOCON, Ltd.
                                                              Registration No: 3244/2004
                                                              ISSN: 1336-5525
    GWP CEE – Global Water Partnership Central and Eastern Europe, c/o Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute, Jeseniova 17, 833 15 Bratislava, Slovakia,
    phone: +421 2 5941 5294, fax: +421 2 5941 5273, e-mail: gwpcee@shmu.sk, http://www.gwpceeforum.org




8

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Smart online players or Dumb pipes? Digital banking service trends 2012
Smart online players or Dumb pipes? Digital banking service trends 2012Smart online players or Dumb pipes? Digital banking service trends 2012
Smart online players or Dumb pipes? Digital banking service trends 2012Shay Rosen (שי רוזן)
 
Multi-Screen Digital Strategy 2013 How to plan a successful Multiscreen Digit...
Multi-Screen Digital Strategy 2013 How to plan a successful Multiscreen Digit...Multi-Screen Digital Strategy 2013 How to plan a successful Multiscreen Digit...
Multi-Screen Digital Strategy 2013 How to plan a successful Multiscreen Digit...Shay Rosen (שי רוזן)
 
Who would be the target audience for you're media product ?
Who would be the target audience for you're media product ?Who would be the target audience for you're media product ?
Who would be the target audience for you're media product ?guest9e0839
 
Empowering Multiscreen web and mobile applications with Mobilespear
Empowering Multiscreen web and mobile applications with MobilespearEmpowering Multiscreen web and mobile applications with Mobilespear
Empowering Multiscreen web and mobile applications with MobilespearShay Rosen (שי רוזן)
 

Viewers also liked (20)

TAC Background Paper No 4 in Romanian
TAC Background Paper No 4 in RomanianTAC Background Paper No 4 in Romanian
TAC Background Paper No 4 in Romanian
 
SustSan workshop: Manual for selection of system for water-waste purification...
SustSan workshop: Manual for selection of system for water-waste purification...SustSan workshop: Manual for selection of system for water-waste purification...
SustSan workshop: Manual for selection of system for water-waste purification...
 
SustSan workshop: Implementation Tools: hardware and software by Tandiwe Erlmann
SustSan workshop: Implementation Tools: hardware and software by Tandiwe ErlmannSustSan workshop: Implementation Tools: hardware and software by Tandiwe Erlmann
SustSan workshop: Implementation Tools: hardware and software by Tandiwe Erlmann
 
IDMP CEE 2nd workshop: The global IDMPActivity by Frederik Pischke
IDMP CEE 2nd workshop: The global IDMPActivity by Frederik PischkeIDMP CEE 2nd workshop: The global IDMPActivity by Frederik Pischke
IDMP CEE 2nd workshop: The global IDMPActivity by Frederik Pischke
 
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Compendium of good practices by Tanja Tajnik
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Compendium of good practices by Tanja TajnikFourth IDMP CEE workshop: Compendium of good practices by Tanja Tajnik
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Compendium of good practices by Tanja Tajnik
 
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: European Drought Observatory (EDO) by Fabio Micale
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: European Drought Observatory (EDO) by Fabio MicaleFourth IDMP CEE workshop: European Drought Observatory (EDO) by Fabio Micale
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: European Drought Observatory (EDO) by Fabio Micale
 
Smart online players or Dumb pipes? Digital banking service trends 2012
Smart online players or Dumb pipes? Digital banking service trends 2012Smart online players or Dumb pipes? Digital banking service trends 2012
Smart online players or Dumb pipes? Digital banking service trends 2012
 
3 3rd prg reporting kindler & van lanen
3 3rd prg reporting kindler & van lanen3 3rd prg reporting kindler & van lanen
3 3rd prg reporting kindler & van lanen
 
IDMP CEE So far by Sabina Bokal
IDMP CEE So far by Sabina BokalIDMP CEE So far by Sabina Bokal
IDMP CEE So far by Sabina Bokal
 
Third IDMP CEE workshop: Upgrading agricultural drought monitoring and foreca...
Third IDMP CEE workshop: Upgrading agricultural drought monitoring and foreca...Third IDMP CEE workshop: Upgrading agricultural drought monitoring and foreca...
Third IDMP CEE workshop: Upgrading agricultural drought monitoring and foreca...
 
Third IDMP CEE workshop: Peer Review Group Report 2 by Henny A. J. van Lanen
Third IDMP CEE workshop: Peer Review Group Report 2 by Henny A. J. van LanenThird IDMP CEE workshop: Peer Review Group Report 2 by Henny A. J. van Lanen
Third IDMP CEE workshop: Peer Review Group Report 2 by Henny A. J. van Lanen
 
Multi-Screen Digital Strategy 2013 How to plan a successful Multiscreen Digit...
Multi-Screen Digital Strategy 2013 How to plan a successful Multiscreen Digit...Multi-Screen Digital Strategy 2013 How to plan a successful Multiscreen Digit...
Multi-Screen Digital Strategy 2013 How to plan a successful Multiscreen Digit...
 
Joint GWP/DMCSEE training: IDMP CEE - Inception phase, planning and where we ...
Joint GWP/DMCSEE training: IDMP CEE - Inception phase, planning and where we ...Joint GWP/DMCSEE training: IDMP CEE - Inception phase, planning and where we ...
Joint GWP/DMCSEE training: IDMP CEE - Inception phase, planning and where we ...
 
Water Resources, Economic Growth and Environmental Sustainability
Water Resources, Economic Growth and Environmental SustainabilityWater Resources, Economic Growth and Environmental Sustainability
Water Resources, Economic Growth and Environmental Sustainability
 
Who would be the target audience for you're media product ?
Who would be the target audience for you're media product ?Who would be the target audience for you're media product ?
Who would be the target audience for you're media product ?
 
Slovak version: Sustainable Sanitation in Central and Eastern Europe
Slovak version: Sustainable Sanitation in Central and Eastern EuropeSlovak version: Sustainable Sanitation in Central and Eastern Europe
Slovak version: Sustainable Sanitation in Central and Eastern Europe
 
IDMP CEE 2nd workshop: 4 Quarter Report by PRG
IDMP CEE 2nd workshop: 4 Quarter Report by PRGIDMP CEE 2nd workshop: 4 Quarter Report by PRG
IDMP CEE 2nd workshop: 4 Quarter Report by PRG
 
Empowering Multiscreen web and mobile applications with Mobilespear
Empowering Multiscreen web and mobile applications with MobilespearEmpowering Multiscreen web and mobile applications with Mobilespear
Empowering Multiscreen web and mobile applications with Mobilespear
 
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Policy oriented study on remote sensing agricultura...
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Policy oriented study on remote sensing agricultura...Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Policy oriented study on remote sensing agricultura...
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Policy oriented study on remote sensing agricultura...
 
IDMP CEE Activity 5.4 by Tamara Tokarczyk
IDMP CEE Activity 5.4 by Tamara TokarczykIDMP CEE Activity 5.4 by Tamara Tokarczyk
IDMP CEE Activity 5.4 by Tamara Tokarczyk
 

Similar to Regional Newsletter 1/2007 (9)

Regional Newsletter 2/2006
Regional Newsletter 2/2006Regional Newsletter 2/2006
Regional Newsletter 2/2006
 
Regional Newsletter 1/2005
Regional Newsletter 1/2005Regional Newsletter 1/2005
Regional Newsletter 1/2005
 
Regional Newsletter 1/2008
Regional Newsletter 1/2008Regional Newsletter 1/2008
Regional Newsletter 1/2008
 
Regional Newsletter 2/2007
Regional Newsletter 2/2007Regional Newsletter 2/2007
Regional Newsletter 2/2007
 
Regional Newsletter 2/2008
Regional Newsletter 2/2008Regional Newsletter 2/2008
Regional Newsletter 2/2008
 
GWP CEE Strategy 2009-2013 Implementation
GWP CEE Strategy 2009-2013 ImplementationGWP CEE Strategy 2009-2013 Implementation
GWP CEE Strategy 2009-2013 Implementation
 
Regional Newsletter 1/2010
Regional Newsletter 1/2010Regional Newsletter 1/2010
Regional Newsletter 1/2010
 
Workshop on Flood management in a transboundary context, 13-14.12.2011, Dimit...
Workshop on Flood management in a transboundary context, 13-14.12.2011, Dimit...Workshop on Flood management in a transboundary context, 13-14.12.2011, Dimit...
Workshop on Flood management in a transboundary context, 13-14.12.2011, Dimit...
 
GWP-Med in action. National Consultation on Drought by Dimitris Faloutsos
GWP-Med in action. National Consultation on Drought by Dimitris FaloutsosGWP-Med in action. National Consultation on Drought by Dimitris Faloutsos
GWP-Med in action. National Consultation on Drought by Dimitris Faloutsos
 

More from Global Water Partnership Central and Eastern Europe

More from Global Water Partnership Central and Eastern Europe (20)

Treatment Wetlands for Sustainable Sanitation in Central and Eastern Europe b...
Treatment Wetlands for Sustainable Sanitation in Central and Eastern Europe b...Treatment Wetlands for Sustainable Sanitation in Central and Eastern Europe b...
Treatment Wetlands for Sustainable Sanitation in Central and Eastern Europe b...
 
IDMP CEE follow-up workshop:
IDMP CEE follow-up workshop: IDMP CEE follow-up workshop:
IDMP CEE follow-up workshop:
 
IDMP CEE follow-up workshop: Rresearch needs and vision for follow up program...
IDMP CEE follow-up workshop: Rresearch needs and vision for follow up program...IDMP CEE follow-up workshop: Rresearch needs and vision for follow up program...
IDMP CEE follow-up workshop: Rresearch needs and vision for follow up program...
 
IDMP CEE follow-up workshop: Adriatic Ionic Strategy by Martina Zupan
IDMP CEE follow-up workshop: Adriatic Ionic Strategy by Martina ZupanIDMP CEE follow-up workshop: Adriatic Ionic Strategy by Martina Zupan
IDMP CEE follow-up workshop: Adriatic Ionic Strategy by Martina Zupan
 
10 eu strategy for the danube region feher
10 eu strategy for the danube region feher10 eu strategy for the danube region feher
10 eu strategy for the danube region feher
 
9 fundraising mapping bokal
9 fundraising mapping bokal9 fundraising mapping bokal
9 fundraising mapping bokal
 
8 eodc status mistelbauer
8 eodc status mistelbauer8 eodc status mistelbauer
8 eodc status mistelbauer
 
7 satida mistelbauer
7 satida mistelbauer7 satida mistelbauer
7 satida mistelbauer
 
6 g wadi network for see-zlatanović&dimkić
6 g wadi network for see-zlatanović&dimkić6 g wadi network for see-zlatanović&dimkić
6 g wadi network for see-zlatanović&dimkić
 
5 drought in romania mateescu
5 drought in romania mateescu5 drought in romania mateescu
5 drought in romania mateescu
 
4 intersucho zalud
4 intersucho zalud4 intersucho zalud
4 intersucho zalud
 
3 drought r&spi-van lanen
3 drought r&spi-van lanen3 drought r&spi-van lanen
3 drought r&spi-van lanen
 
2 dmcsee gregorič
2 dmcsee gregorič2 dmcsee gregorič
2 dmcsee gregorič
 
1 idmp help desk stefanski
1 idmp help desk stefanski1 idmp help desk stefanski
1 idmp help desk stefanski
 
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Follow-up on Natural Small Water Retention Measures...
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Follow-up on Natural Small Water Retention Measures...Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Follow-up on Natural Small Water Retention Measures...
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Follow-up on Natural Small Water Retention Measures...
 
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Water and Drought Management and in the Adriatic S...
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Water and Drought Management and  in the Adriatic S...Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Water and Drought Management and  in the Adriatic S...
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Water and Drought Management and in the Adriatic S...
 
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Proposed Follow-up pilot projects in forests by Urs...
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Proposed Follow-up pilot projects in forests by Urs...Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Proposed Follow-up pilot projects in forests by Urs...
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Proposed Follow-up pilot projects in forests by Urs...
 
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: IDMP CEE Communications by Gergana Majercakova
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: IDMP CEE Communications by Gergana MajercakovaFourth IDMP CEE workshop: IDMP CEE Communications by Gergana Majercakova
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: IDMP CEE Communications by Gergana Majercakova
 
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Assessment of drought impact on forests by Galia Ba...
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Assessment of drought impact on forests by Galia Ba...Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Assessment of drought impact on forests by Galia Ba...
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Assessment of drought impact on forests by Galia Ba...
 
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Natural Small Water Retention Measures by Anja Potokar
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Natural Small Water Retention Measures by Anja PotokarFourth IDMP CEE workshop: Natural Small Water Retention Measures by Anja Potokar
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Natural Small Water Retention Measures by Anja Potokar
 

Recently uploaded

How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17Celine George
 
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 SalesHow to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 SalesCeline George
 
Clinical Pharmacy Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
Clinical Pharmacy  Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptxClinical Pharmacy  Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
Clinical Pharmacy Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptxraviapr7
 
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Patterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptx
Patterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptxPatterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptx
Patterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptxMYDA ANGELICA SUAN
 
CAULIFLOWER BREEDING 1 Parmar pptx
CAULIFLOWER BREEDING 1 Parmar pptxCAULIFLOWER BREEDING 1 Parmar pptx
CAULIFLOWER BREEDING 1 Parmar pptxSaurabhParmar42
 
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a ParagraphPresentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a ParagraphNetziValdelomar1
 
How to Add a New Field in Existing Kanban View in Odoo 17
How to Add a New Field in Existing Kanban View in Odoo 17How to Add a New Field in Existing Kanban View in Odoo 17
How to Add a New Field in Existing Kanban View in Odoo 17Celine George
 
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdfP4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdfYu Kanazawa / Osaka University
 
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive EducationBenefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive EducationMJDuyan
 
The basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptxheathfieldcps1
 
Philosophy of Education and Educational Philosophy
Philosophy of Education  and Educational PhilosophyPhilosophy of Education  and Educational Philosophy
Philosophy of Education and Educational PhilosophyShuvankar Madhu
 
Human-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming Classes
Human-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming ClassesHuman-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming Classes
Human-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming ClassesMohammad Hassany
 
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17Celine George
 
3.21.24 The Origins of Black Power.pptx
3.21.24  The Origins of Black Power.pptx3.21.24  The Origins of Black Power.pptx
3.21.24 The Origins of Black Power.pptxmary850239
 
General views of Histopathology and step
General views of Histopathology and stepGeneral views of Histopathology and step
General views of Histopathology and stepobaje godwin sunday
 
DUST OF SNOW_BY ROBERT FROST_EDITED BY_ TANMOY MISHRA
DUST OF SNOW_BY ROBERT FROST_EDITED BY_ TANMOY MISHRADUST OF SNOW_BY ROBERT FROST_EDITED BY_ TANMOY MISHRA
DUST OF SNOW_BY ROBERT FROST_EDITED BY_ TANMOY MISHRATanmoy Mishra
 
Maximizing Impact_ Nonprofit Website Planning, Budgeting, and Design.pdf
Maximizing Impact_ Nonprofit Website Planning, Budgeting, and Design.pdfMaximizing Impact_ Nonprofit Website Planning, Budgeting, and Design.pdf
Maximizing Impact_ Nonprofit Website Planning, Budgeting, and Design.pdfTechSoup
 
The Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George Wells
The Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George WellsThe Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George Wells
The Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George WellsEugene Lysak
 
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptxM-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptxDr. Santhosh Kumar. N
 

Recently uploaded (20)

How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
 
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 SalesHow to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
 
Clinical Pharmacy Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
Clinical Pharmacy  Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptxClinical Pharmacy  Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
Clinical Pharmacy Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
 
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
 
Patterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptx
Patterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptxPatterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptx
Patterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptx
 
CAULIFLOWER BREEDING 1 Parmar pptx
CAULIFLOWER BREEDING 1 Parmar pptxCAULIFLOWER BREEDING 1 Parmar pptx
CAULIFLOWER BREEDING 1 Parmar pptx
 
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a ParagraphPresentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
 
How to Add a New Field in Existing Kanban View in Odoo 17
How to Add a New Field in Existing Kanban View in Odoo 17How to Add a New Field in Existing Kanban View in Odoo 17
How to Add a New Field in Existing Kanban View in Odoo 17
 
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdfP4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
 
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive EducationBenefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
 
The basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptx
 
Philosophy of Education and Educational Philosophy
Philosophy of Education  and Educational PhilosophyPhilosophy of Education  and Educational Philosophy
Philosophy of Education and Educational Philosophy
 
Human-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming Classes
Human-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming ClassesHuman-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming Classes
Human-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming Classes
 
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
 
3.21.24 The Origins of Black Power.pptx
3.21.24  The Origins of Black Power.pptx3.21.24  The Origins of Black Power.pptx
3.21.24 The Origins of Black Power.pptx
 
General views of Histopathology and step
General views of Histopathology and stepGeneral views of Histopathology and step
General views of Histopathology and step
 
DUST OF SNOW_BY ROBERT FROST_EDITED BY_ TANMOY MISHRA
DUST OF SNOW_BY ROBERT FROST_EDITED BY_ TANMOY MISHRADUST OF SNOW_BY ROBERT FROST_EDITED BY_ TANMOY MISHRA
DUST OF SNOW_BY ROBERT FROST_EDITED BY_ TANMOY MISHRA
 
Maximizing Impact_ Nonprofit Website Planning, Budgeting, and Design.pdf
Maximizing Impact_ Nonprofit Website Planning, Budgeting, and Design.pdfMaximizing Impact_ Nonprofit Website Planning, Budgeting, and Design.pdf
Maximizing Impact_ Nonprofit Website Planning, Budgeting, and Design.pdf
 
The Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George Wells
The Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George WellsThe Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George Wells
The Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George Wells
 
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptxM-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
 

Regional Newsletter 1/2007

  • 1. May 2007 IWRM National dialogue in Poland Calendar of Events THE NATIONAL DIALOGUE WAS HELD ON NO- ter management to overcome potential con- National IWRM Dialogue in Slovenia VEMBER 14, 2006 IN WARSAW BASED MI- flicts of interest among them. April 22, 2007 NISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT. Ljubljana, Slovenia During the discussion with participation of Mr. Gajda who was answering several ques- National IWRM Dialogue in Romania tions, the principal issue was how to over- April 25, 2007 come potential conflicts of interest between Bucharest, Romania different agencies and authorities involved in The seminar was opened by the chair of GWP water management. It’s clear that not all of Poland, Prof. Janusz Kindler who welcomed them will greet with enthusiasm the changes National IWRM Dialogue in Estonia Mr. Mariusz Gajda, the new Chairman of the considered in the proposal presented. The se- May 9, 2007 National Water Management Administration. cond presentation was “Droughts in Poland” Tallinn, Estonia The new administrative body, working under concentrating on severe drought that occur- Ministry of Environment, was established ac- red in the summer of 2006. The final presen- National IWRM Dialogue in Moldova cording to updated Polish Water Law on July 1, tation was under the title “Implementation May 14-16, 2007 2006. In Poland, the Ministry of Environment of EU Water Framework Directive in Poland Chisinau, Moldova deals with water management policy and the - conditions for success”. The dialogue, hos- strategy. ted by GWP Poland, provided an opportunity National IWRM Dialogue in Czech Republic to discuss openly all difficult issues and dif- May 15-16, 2007 Mr. Gajda presented his paper “New gover- ferent opinions. Medlov, Czech Republic nance arrangements for water management in Poland” which describes new proposal on More than 80 practitioners from all around National IWRM Dialogue in Hungary, phase II how to overcome the institutional fragmen- the country attended the dialogue. In addition tation of water management in the country to regular GWP Poland partners, the venue at- May 31, 2007 between state government and the self-go- tracted several newcomers as the topic of wa- Szabadkigyos, Hungary vernment authorities at the local, county and ter management planning is currently on the provincial levels. The keynote presentation top agenda in Poland. Based on demands of National IWRM Dialogue in Slovakia was followed by a lively discussion. It came the participants, two more national dialogues June 18, 2007 up that the success of water management are slated for early 2007. For more information, Bratislava, Slovakia planning largely depends on the will of diffe- please contact Dr. Janusz Kindler, GWP Poland rent agencies and authorities involved in wa- Chair, e-mail: janusz.kindler@is.pw.edu.pl. International Tool Box seminar August 30-31, 2007 CREDIT: EWA SKUPISNKA Nyiregyháza, Hungary First GWP CACENA, CEE and MED Inter-regional Partners Meeting Addressing EU Neighbourhood Policy from a water resources management perspec- tive October 6-7, 2007 Varna, Bulgaria GWP CEE Regional Council Meeting October 8-9, 2007 Varna, Bulgaria 6th IWA Conference on Wastewater Recla- mation and Reuse for Sustainability October 9-12, 2007 2nd phase of the national dialogue in Poland Antwerp, Belgium
  • 2. Interview with Lucia Ana Varga, State Secretary, Romanian Ministry of the Environment and Sustainable Development IN CONTINUATION OF OUR SERIES OF INTER- VIEWS WITH THE MINISTERS OF THE ENVIRON- MENT FROM THE 11 CENTRAL AND EASTERN EU- ROPEAN COUNTRIES, WHICH ARE PART OF GWP CEE REGION, WE BRING YOU THE INTERVIEW WITH STATE SECRETARY OF ROMANIAN MINIS- TRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, LUCIA ANA VARGA. State Secretary Lucia Ana Varga studied me- chanics at the Technical University of Timi- soara from 1986 to 1991. In 2001 she became a mechanical engineering candidate for a doc- tor’s degree at the Faculty of Mechanics at the same university. From 1991 to 1998, Ms. Var- ga was a school teacher in Oradea. Afterwards she worked for the Bihor County Commissari- at of the National Environmental Guard as an inspector and chief commissioner until 2005, when she was appointed State Secretary at the Ministry of the Environment and Water Man- agement. During her ministerial career to date, Ms. Varga was elected President of the Bureau the resource - water demand equation and the nating the unitary implementation of actions of the Meeting of the Parties on the Protocol on fact that water resource protection requires use and measures for the prevention and manage- Water and Health to the 1992 Convention on analysis at the river basin level; ment of specific emergency situations on the the Protection and Use of Transboundary Wa- ● the integration of flood defense issues with national level; tercourses and International Lakes (2007). In aspects regarding conservation and the devel- ● Directorate for Water Resource Manage- January 2007, she took over the Presidency of opment of aquatic biodiversity; ment, with responsibilities concerning quanti- the International Commission for the Protec- ● the integration of water resources in planning tative and qualitative water management and tion of the Danube River (ICPDR) for one year. policies, taking into account the fact that water is especially concerning European Union aspects, Between 1998 and 2006, she graduated from one of the basic elements of life and at the same the implementation of bilateral and multilateral various training courses and seminars on the time a factor which determines socio-economic agreements in the water field and coordination environment, law, communications and public development, is often a limiting factor. of the activities of the transboundary river basin relations, security and national defense – secu- In the water field, Romania has successfully districts; rity and good governance and internal auditors. managed to cope with nearly all of these IWRM ● Directorate for Dam Safety and Water Ca- She speaks English fluently. Ms. Varga is mem- requirements through both the management dastre, with responsibilities for regulating the ber of the Liberal National Party. system and the undertaken and foreseen activi- operational regime of water resources and res- ties aiming to obtain sustainable water devel- ervoirs and regulations on dam safety exploita- 1. Water Talk: GWP defines Integrated Water opment. tion, organization, recording and management Resources Management (IWRM) as a proc- In this sense, at the national level, the Minis- of the Water Cadastre of Romania; ess which promotes the coordinated devel- try of the Environment and Water Management ● State Water Inspection with the main re- opment and management of water, land and carries out the policy in the environment and sponsibility for the supervision of the legisla- related resources, in order to maximize the water management fields, the strategy and spe- tion implementation in water field, harmonized resultant economic and social welfare in an cific regulations for the development and har- with the provisions of the EU water directives. equitable manner without compromising the monization of those activities within the gener- The implementation of the national policy and sustainability of vital ecosystems. How do al government policy, ensures and coordinates strategy in water management, developed by you see the challenges of IWRM implemen- the application of the Governmental strate- the Ministry is carried out by the “Apele Ro- tation in practice in Romania? gy within the respective fields of activity, thus mane” National Administration, which is or- As it was mentioned, the concept of Integrated achieving the role of state authority, synthesis, ganized on the basin level (11 river basins). Water Resources Management implies: coordination and control. The Water Depart- Its responsibilities are related to quantitative, ● the integration of all water categories: sur- ment covers the full area of activities related to qualitative water monitoring, regulation of wa- face water, groundwater, transitional water and water including the following Directorates: ter resources use as well as the implementation coastal water as well as quantitative, qualitative ● Directorate for the Prevention and Manage- of water management legislation, harmonized and biological issues of water; ment of Emergency Situations, with responsi- with the EU water directives. ● the integration of water use at the river ba- bilities concerning flood protection and control But sustainable water development is not only sin level, which reveals the need for solving of and hydro-meteorological emergencies, coordi- carried out through activities and technical, in- 2
  • 3. stitutional and legislative measures but also The estimated costs for the implementation of The main potential beneficiaries of the Struc- through the promotion of the participation of all Drinking Water Directive 98/83/EC are 5.6 mil- tural and Cohesion Funds within the frame- involved actors, as consultative partners in the lion euros, which are needed up to 2015 for: work of SOP are the local public authorities decision making process. In order to create the ● country-wide monitoring of drinking water that at present are beneficiaries of Phare, ISPA mechanisms of consultation on all levels, such quality – new analytical equipment; and other international funds. The preparato- as local collectivities, water users within the river ● investment in equipment for control moni- ry activities for Structural and Cohesion Funds, basins and water management services benefi- toring performed by the producers; which are time consuming for major projects, ciaries; the Basin Committees were established ● improvement of technologies and extension started at the beginning of 2004. Pre-accession through Water Law No. 107/1996 with amend- of water treatment; funds, external grants and bilateral agreements ments. These Basin Committees are organized on ● rehabilitation and extension of the water have been largely used to develop feasibility the territorial level within the Water Directorates supply networks; studies and other back-up documents and also of “Apele Romane”, as consultative organisms, ● replacement of the domestic distribution to support the activities aimed at improving in- underlining the concern of the Ministry of the systems. stitutional governing with a view to increasing Environment and Water Management for sus- The fact that the investments in the water infra- the role of local authorities in project imple- taining the public participation process. The cre- structure are costly is a reality, but it is also true mentation, tendering and contracting. ation of these structures lay at the heart of the that they are absolutely necessary. Within the The providing of grants to the water sector is following main objectives: involvement within strategic approach of the water infrastructure conditioned on the creation of Regional Water the decision-making activities of the local ben- projects, Romania has foreseen a long term per- Companies (regional operators). The regionali- eficiaries and efficient cooperation between local spective of the development of the work, taking zation process is essential because in order to water management bodies and local public ad- into consideration both the size of the human implement the environmental aquis require- ministration authorities in order to maintain the agglomerations which generate a huge volume ments, experienced water companies that can balance of water resource conservation and their of waste water and the financial efforts involved make proper investments and guarantee the sustainable development. in arranging investments in this field. The de- functioning quality of the facilities built are velopment, in time, of the financial efforts al- needed. Without grants, most of the small opera- 2. Water talk: Implementation of EU legis- lows for sustainable development of the projects, tors will not be able to comply with the aquis. lation for the new members, which entered which takes into consideration acceptance, both Therefore, there is a strong motivation for dif- the EU at the beginning of 2007, means an of the population and involved institutions. ferent operators to associate in regional water opportunity for improving the environmen- Therefore Romania has developed a strategic companies with a view to overcoming poten- tal infrastructure with co-financing from EU document titled the Sectoral Operational Pro- tial administrative problems. By promoting in- funds. To which measures in the area of wa- gram for the Environment (SOP) that covers the tegrated water and waste water systems within ter protection, management and use is the period from 2007 to 2013 and supports the ful- a regional approach, Romania aims to maximize support from Structural Funds and the Co- fillment of Romania’s obligations in the envi- cost efficiency. Thus, communities from clearly hesion Fund for the programming period ronmental field, while offering investment op- defined areas (for example from a river basin) 2007 – 2013 directed and who might bene- portunities across the country. The SOP strategy are encouraged to join together and develop fit from that support? How much funding focuses on collective investments and services a common long term investment program for is needed for improving and developing the necessary to raise long term competitiveness, water sector development (Master Plan for wa- environmental water infrastructure in the create new jobs and obtain sustainable devel- ter/waste water). near future? opment. During the mentioned period, for all Due to the significant investment needed in the Due to the investment needs in water and of the investments in the environmental sec- water infrastructure, within the process of our waste water infrastructure – which are eval- tor, Romania is counting on a contribution of EU/IWRM implementation, additional financing uated at almost 15 billion euros – in order to 4.5 billion euros from Structural and Cohesion sources have been foreseen. They include: comply with European legislation, Romania has Funds, an amount that is far below the needs ● The National Program for Rural Develop- requested a longer period of transition (during estimated for the same period. ment, co-financed by the EU for 2007-2013 co- the negotiations with the European Commis- One of the main objectives of the SOP is the im- ordinated by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forests sion) than other recent member states, which provement of water quality and access to wa- and Rural Development that includes water in- can allow for the achievement of the invest- ter and the waste water infrastructure based on frastructure investments within the rural areas; ment efforts needed. providing water and water sewerage systems in ● The Governmental Program for Infrastructure The Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive 91/ urban areas up to 2015. The SOP continues the Development in Rural Zones for 2006 – 2008; 271/EEC: implementation requires necessary in- environmental infrastructure development pro- ● The National Environmental Fund, for co-fi- vestments of 9.5 billion euros (5.7 billion euros grams at the national level that have been initi- nancing; for the water treatment plants and 3.8 billion eu- ated within the framework of the pre-accession ● External funds and different forms of Public ros for water sewerage systems) up to 2018 for: assistance, specifically Phare and ISPA. Private Partnerships. ● construction of new urban waste water treat- SOP’s priority regarding the extension and mod- ment plants; ernization of the water supply and sewerage 3. Water talk: WFD is the most complex set ● up-grading of existing urban waste water systems will be financed through the Cohesion of goals, tools and commitments in the EU treatment plants; Fund; the financial planning is presented below: water-sector to date. Two of the main WFD ● up-grading of existing waste water treat- ment plants in the agro-food industry; EC financing (Euro) National financing (Euro) Total (Euro) Co-financing rate ● rehabilitation of existing urban sewage col- Improvement of the lecting systems; water supply 2,776,532,160 489,976,263 3,266,508,423 85% ● construction and/or extension of urban sew- and sewerage systems age collecting systems. 3
  • 4. goals are the protection and improvement of monized Körös/Crisuri river basin management gen and 66% of the total phosphorous flow- the quality of water ecosystems and sustain- plan in a participative process (French technical ing in dissolved form into the Black Sea come able, balanced and equitable water use. This and financial support under the coordination of from the Danube river basin. More than half of directive provides broad opportunities for ICPDR) with the following expected results: all nutrient loads in the Danube River originate public participation in river basin manage- ● Strengthening Hungarian and Romanian co- from agriculture; about one fourth from private ment and is transposed into Romanian legi- operation between transboundary organiza- households and about 10 - 13% from industry. slation. How can the participation of water tions in charge of water management including Romania is the largest contributor of nutrients stakeholders, the public and NGO’s, be en- public participation; to the Black Sea as its entire territory drains into sured during the implementation of this di- ● Enhancing stakeholder consultation and pre- the Black Sea. rective and especially in preparation of the paring a pilot joint public consultation project Taking into account the above mentioned facts river basin management plans which must be based on a timetable and a WFD work pro- and also the necessity to comply with EU re- completed by 2009? What do you think? gramme and the main issue in the Körös/Crisuri quirements regarding the mitigation of nitrate The implementation of WFD requires the co-or- basin (as a pilot project for the Tisa basin/region pollution, the Ministry of the Environment and dination of the all involved parties at the na- consultation) – on going. Water Management has developed the Imple- tional and river basin levels. One of the main 3.“Clean Crisuri” pilot basin project (based on mentation Plan of Nitrates Directive and Action components of the development of the river ba- two education strategies developed by MoEWM Programs for vulnerable areas. Furthermore, the sin management plans is the public information for children and adults) – on going - that aims Ministry with the support of the World Bank, and consultation process. In order to facilitate at informing people and raising their involve- has carried out the Agricultural Pollution Con- this process and to comply with the provisions ment in elaborating the water protection and trol Project which is aimed at significantly in- of the Water Framework Directive, the Minis- management strategies through: creasing the use of environment friendly agri- try of the Environment and Water Management ● questionnaires; cultural and household practices in rural areas has promoted two ministerial orders for the ap- ● printed information/education booklets/leaf- in order to ultimately reduce the discharge of proval of: lets; nutrients and other agricultural pollutants ● Procedures for public consultation in the de- ● web site (www.crisuricurate.go.ro) into the Danube River and Black Sea through cision making process related to water man- ● public meetings; integrated land and water management. The agement (Ministerial Order no. 1044/27 October ● education/awareness campaigns. achievements of the project include: 2005); Other achievements aimed at public involve- ● Development and implementation of manure ● Procedures for public information access re- ment and awareness performed by the Minis- management plans; lated to water management (Ministerial Order try of Environment and Water Management ● Development, revision and dissemination of no. 1012/19 October 2005). (MoEWM) are: the Code for Good Agricultural Practice; Also the River Basin Committees provide the ● two communication strategy (for kids and ● Development of standard action programs framework for public consultation and partici- adults ) which have been disseminated at the for vulnerable plain areas; pation, including the management plans for all national level, as a framework for local activi- ● Realization of local, regional and national 11 river basins elaborated according to the WFD. ties (depending on the local situation); public awareness campaigns; Each committee includes 15 members: water ● 2007 Communication Plan of the MoEWM; ● Testing and proving of ecological agriculture management bodies, representatives of central ● MoEWM website – an important and cost ef- practice within the vulnerable areas. and local authorities, representatives of prefec- ficient tool/“Kids Corner” – ecological education In 2006, implementation at the national level tures and county councils, users (industry, agri- for children (based on the idea that children are was approved. The extended project amounts to culture, localities) and NGO’s. All of these mem- excellent conveyors of the message); 50 millions euros and has a view to realize the bers are involved in the decision making process ● national TV spots (2 weeks before the events programs and plans established for the vulner- in order to advise the national government, pro- - on 3 channels of Romanian National Televi- able areas identified on the Romania’s territory. mote public participation concerning the river sion) for celebrating: Danube Day (every year, basin management process and to inform the starting from 2004) and International Black Sea 5. Water talk: Global climate changes in the other key stakeholders about public participa- Day (starting from 2006 for public awareness form of flash floods and heavy storms are tion possibilities and structures. on the necessity of the protection and the con- affecting all the countries in the region of The following projects have been developed: servation of the marine environment); Central and Eastern Europe. Which arrange- 1. Enhancing Access to Information and Pub- ● two national campaigns in 2007 on raising ments and measures, in your opinion, should lic Participation in Environmental Decision-ma- public awareness and informing people (1) and be adopted in order to reduce the results of king UNDP-GEF Danube Regional Project- Com- (2) authorities/industries about the WFD provi- this threat? ponent 3.4 included as activities: sions. The painful experience from 2005 and the ● Public Access to water management In- spring of 2006 has shown that the old patterns formation/Public Participation in the decision 4. Water talk: the implementation of EU Di- are no longer valid under the new climate con- making process in water management – a ma- rectives will be an important factor in miti- ditions and that the existing protection work as nual for authorities which has been written es- gating the agricultural impact on the envi- designed is not effective because the environ- pecially for those authorities not involved in ronment; however, it is necessary to involve mental conditions have changed dramatically. water management issues; it was printed under farmers in the practical realization of envi- Also, developments undertaken in the last 50 the coordination of the Regional Environment ronmental legislation. What kind of measu- years have had a major influence on these dis- Center and with the support of the Ministry of res for mitigating impacts and enhancing astrous floods and call for necessary solutions the Environment and Water Management. environmental benefits are applied in Ro- for the rehabilitation of this situation. There- ● Elaboration of a brochure on the same topic mania? fore, Romania is in the process of reshaping and for the public and NGO’s as target groups. The Black Sea Environmental Program (BSEP) updating existing water management plans and 2. Support for the future preparation of a har- Studies revealed that 58% of the total nitro- thus starting to develop a long term strategy for 4
  • 5. flood control. Romania has also initiated specif- on the Danube will be done through a combina- ● the development of research on the impact ic activities in order to enhance its capacity to tion of hydro-technical works and wetlands. of the climate change on water quality. tackle the problem of floods in particular and The results of the research carried out on the As a result, the project “Forward Integration of Flood the dangerous meteorological phenomena in impact of climate change on water resources Warning in Areas Prone to Flash Floods” funded by general. As a result, the national meteorological involve the consideration of the following as- the WMO and implemented by the GWP – Romania system has been modernized and the hydrolog- pects that should be adopted in order to reduce in partnership with the National Institute for Hy- ical system is in the process of modernization. the consequences of these threats: drology and Water Management, and which was of In order to improve the intervention capacity, ● development of new criteria and techniques a great help to us through its educational materials a large project concerning the improving of in- for the designing of hydraulic structures to in showing the ways of protecting of the population, tervention capacity in the event of floods and make water management systems more sensi- goods and cultural values and the mitigation of the accidental pollution is in the implementation tive to the modifications of the hydrological re- losses was carried out. As shown in the project re- stage. This project has a total value of about 135 gime, due to the impact of climate variability port, this was made possible through an ensemble million euros and also deals with the improve- and climate change; of activities consisting of awareness, warning, pre- ment of reservoir management, particularly in ● elaboration of new procedures for the opera- alarming and alarming, sheltering, evacuation and flood and drought situations. Romania is also tion of water management systems to take into other technical and organizational measures which developing a study concerning the “Ecological consideration the uncertainty of the hydrologi- the inhabitants are prepared how to use. and economic re-sizing of the Romanian Dan- cal regime evaluation, due especially to climate ube Floodplain” based on which flood control change; Water Talk: Thank you for the interview! IWRM National Dialogue in Bulgaria THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE “ECOLOGICAL ALTERNATIVES FOR INTE- In addition to the plenary sessions, there was also a poster session, group GRATED WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT” WAS HELD IN ARBANASSI ON discussions and field visits to the villages of Varbitza and Draganovo (Gor- NOVEMBER 23-25, 2006. na Oryahovitsa Municipality). Conclusions At the end of the conference, organizers summarized the results of the group work discussions and field visits and made the following proposals to the central and local authorities: ● development and implementation of a pilot project for IWRM for small settlements. The Gorna Oryahovitsa Municipality and District Government In Bulgaria, national programs and strategies refer to the construction of a col- would support such a project in the villages of Varbitza and Draganovo. lecting system and WWTPs for agglomerations over 2000 people. All available ● extension of the network of ecosan toilets in rural regions; schools financial resources for the environment are expected to be directed precisely should be given priority towards these agglomerations. However, 4,765 settlements are currently not ● development of cooperation and sponsorship for implementing IWRM covered by these programs. They include approximately 1.8 million inhabitants, and ecosanitation technologies which makes up approximately 24 % of the population. At present, there is no ● organization of regular forums with decision-makers and other stake- single working sustainable sanitation system in the country. holders for supporting the implementation of IWRM and EcoSan ● development of training materials for IWRM concepts and ecosan technolo- To cover this gap, Bulgaria Water Partnership in cooperation with EcoSan- gies for water engineers, vets, foresters, agronomists, etc. and for conducting Res, Earth Forever, Women in Europe for a Common Future, the Institute of training programs for university students, practitioners and other experts. Water Problems-Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, the Regional Inspectorate ● conducting research on the application of ecosan under different natu- of the Environment, Water Veliko Tarnovo and the Yovkovtsi Water Supply ral and socio-economic conditions in Bulgaria & Sewerage Company organized this international conference in Arbanassi M. Mochurova on November 23-25, 2006. Bulgaria Water Partnership CREDIT: GWP BULGARIA The aim of this conference was to raise public awareness of water supply and sanitation problems in small and dispersed communities. It also provided guidance and coordination of actions for optimal ecological solutions for wastewater collection and treatment according to IWRM principles. In total, 44 participants from ministries, municipalities, river basin direc- torates, science and research institutions and universities, NGOs took part. Key note presentations were made by Peter Ridderstolpe (Sweden) – “Na- tural System for Wastewater and Sludge Management with Focus on Small Settlements in Cold Climates”; Nataliya Gudkova (Ukraine) – “MAMA-86’s Experience in the Introduction of Dry Urine-Diverting Toilets in Ukraine”; Diana Iskreva-Idigo (Bulgaria) “Pilot Ecosan in Rural Bulgaria” and Margriet Samwel&Bistra Mihailova (Germany) “Women in Europe for Common Fu- ture (WECF) Programme in region of Eastern Europe and Caucasus”. IWRM National Dialogue in Bulgaria 5
  • 6. IWRM National dialogue in Hungary ing local people and the community is need- ed. This will involve new institutional arrange- ments. There must be a high level of autonomy, THE NATIONAL DIALOGUE TOOK PART ON NO- Cities are dominant features in the catchments but this must at the same time be associated VEMBER 13, 2006 IN BUDAPEST WITH A FOCUS where they occur, and success in IUWM will with transparency and accountability for all de- ON THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT AND IWRM. make important contributions to the theory and cisions. practice of integrated catchment management ● At many levels in the process – even at the and IWRM in the broader basin context. governmental level – stakeholders lack the necessary knowledge and skills for full appli- Taking this into account the Ministry for the En- cation of IWRM. Community stakeholders may vironment and Water together with GWP Hun- not be familiar with the concept of water re- gary decided to organize a national meeting on source management, catchment management, Urban space and IWRM urban environment with special regard to Inte- corporate governance and their role in these. Urban areas play an important role in delivering grated Water Resource Management. ● Where specific areas of responsibility fall the objectives of the EU Sustainable Develop- outside the mandate of a single government ment Strategy. In urban areas the environmen- The national dialogue was held on November department, appropriate institutional arrange- tal, economic and social dimensions meet most 13, 2006 with the participation of more than ments are required to ensure effective inter- strongly. Cities are where many environmental 80 stakeholders from different fields such as departmental collaboration. Effective IWRM is problems are concentrated, but they are also local authorities, ministries, NGOs, universities, a top-down-meets- bottom-up process. the economic drivers, the places where business regional institutions. The opening speech has ● The political will to achieve effective imple- is done and investments are made. Four out of been given by Miklós Persányi - Minister for mentation is indispensable on the part of those five European citizens live in urban areas, and the Environment and Water, followed by Gyula taking part - both in the public and private sec- their quality of life is directly influenced by the Hegyi - EP member. From GWP Hungary, Gyula tors. state of the urban environment. Reich gave a presentation on IWRM and urban ● Policies must be meaningful – especially environment. those regarding the poor and marginalized in Most cities are confronted with a common core developing countries. set of environmental problems such as poor Conclusions ● Water management must be prepared with air quality, high levels of traffic and conges- Lively discussions followed and among others, the full involvement of the stakeholders con- tion, high levels of ambient noise, poor-quality the following conclusions were drawn: cerned. building environment, derelict land, greenhouse ● IWRM should be applied at the catchment ● Monitoring of implementation and results is gas emissions, urban sprawl and a generation of level. The catchment is the smallest complete essential - with all stakeholders involved. waste and waste-water. hydrological unit of analysis and management. ● Successful communication includes report- ● It is critical to integrate water and environ- ing to the public on results, as well as listening Local authorities have a decisive role in improv- mental management. This principle is widely to feedback. ing the urban environment. The diversity in terms and strongly supported. IWRM can be strength- The main “lesson learned” from this dialogue is of history, geography, climate, administrative and ened through the integration of Environmen- that more meetings and training sessions at the legal conditions calls for locally developed, tailor- tal Impact Assessments (EIA’s), water resource local level are needed to keep all stakeholders made solutions for the urban environment. Ap- modeling and land use planning. better informed. plication of the subsidiary principle, where action ● Full participation by all stakeholders, includ- GWP Hungary should be taken at the most effective level also CREDIT: MIKLOS KERESZTES implies acting at the local level. Many local authorities have expressed the need for specific skills to adopt an integrated ap- proach to management involving cross-sector cooperation and training on specific environ- mental legislation, effective public participation and encouraging changes in citizens’ behavior. ‘Face to face’ training with the involvement of national, regional and local authorities is re- garded by stakeholders as the most valuable learning method. The fundamental premise is generally accept- ed that IWRM should be applied at catchments level, recognizing catchments or watersheds as the basic hydrological unit of analysis and mana- gement. At the implementation level, there is a growing conviction that integrated urban wa- ter management (IUWM) could be pursued as a vital component of IWRM within the specific problematic context of urban areas. Miklos Persanyi, the Minister of Environment, opened IWRM National Dialogue 6
  • 7. IWRM National dialogue in Ukraine countries, such as France were expressed. The opinion that river basin authorities should be legislative bodies responsible for all aspects of THE UKRAINE WATER PARTNERSHIP (UWP) society, i.e. the ministries of water resources water management and the state of the river AND THE INTERAGENCY COORDINATING (State Committee), finance, economy, forestry, was expressed by some RBOs and NGOs. GROUP FOR DEVELOPMENT OF WATER RE- communal services, justice, the parliamentary SOURCES ORGANIZED THE NATIONAL IWRM committee on the environment, the nine key Representatives from the Ministries of Econo- DIALOGUE IN KIEV ON MARCH 16, 2007. river basins (of which eight are transbound- my and Finance together with parliamentary ary) and the key NGOs (of rivers, environment representatives gave valuable and construc- and social sectors). tive comments on the way forward in imple- menting river basin management. In Ukraine, amendments to the water code are in preparation, and transition to the ba- The meeting was concluded with the adoption Since 2002 the Ukrainian water sector has sin management was proclaimed in 2002. To- of a final resolution which will be presented been in the process of transition to the mana- day the Dniestr river basin serves as a pilot to the Deputy Prime Minister. Participants also gement within hydrographic (basin) bound- basin for integrated river basin management. adopted Joint Statement regarding their views aries. There are, however, different points of The Dnepr, Donets, Western Bugh, Tisza and on ways and means of IWRM implementation view regarding mandates, tasks, functions and other river basins are also involved in this de- in Ukraine. It was proposed that IWRM Imple- the organizational structure of the established velopment. mentation Strategy should become a part of River Basin Organizations (RBO). the recently announced plans to develop new The dialogue was distinguished by its in- National Environmental Strategy and should The river basin management theme brought volvement of river basin managers from re- be included in the new program of coopera- together approximately 50 participants from mote parts of Ukraine. Demands for capaci- tion between EU and Ukraine. almost all relevant sectors and levels of the ty building and learning from more advanced World Wetlands Day – Danube wetland work ahead but not enough DANUBE NGOS (NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS) ARE DOING be most important about wetlands. The result was that most found GOOD PROJECTS THAT HELP PROTECT AND RESTORE VALUABLE WET- wetlands beneficial for habitat protection, flood control and recrea- LANDS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN. tional purposes (68%), but only 9% found them useful for nutrient pollution control. “The results prove that the case for using wetlands for nutrient pol- lution needs to be better promoted on Wetlands Day and every day,” says Whalley. To better encourage the importance of Danube wet- lands, the DRP is developing a guidance document for wetland mana- gers that includes case studies where wetlands have improved wa- But more wetland projects are needed to make better use of wet- ter quality. lands as pollution removers, says Peter Whalley of the UNDP/GEF Danube Regional Project (DRP). The DRP has also funded numerous wetland pollution-reduction projects implemented by Danube NGOs. Examples include a project ‘Wetlands’ are places where water and land naturally cooperate to in Veresegyház, Hungary where local NGO Tavirozsa restocked a lake protect water, animals, plants and humans. Besides absorbing pol- with original wetland plants and removed alien fish species that eat lution, wetlands provide numerous other valuable services such as wetland plants -- to reduce the lake’s nutrient pollution problem. reducing the impacts from floods and providing homes for fish and plant species. In Slovakia, the NGO BROZ cooperated with Slovak State Forests to introduce nature-oriented forestry in the 1,500 ha Rusovce flood- Unfortunately, some 80% of the Danube Basin’s wetlands and flood- plain near Bratislava. The new management will remove alien trees plains have been lost due to past human activities over the last 150 and plant native tree species such as elm, oak and wild pear. In ad- years, from river channelling to making room for more farmland. dition, BROZ together with the State Nature Conservancy submitted proposals for three new protected wetland sites of nearly 1,400 ha “Danube countries are missing an excellent opportunity to use wet- along the Danube. lands to reduce water pollution, especially from nutrients,” says Whal- ley. Nutrient pollution is a serious problem in the Danube Basin and In south Moravia, Czech Republic, local NGO Sagittaria prepared and one that countries need to address before they can meet EU water leg- helped implement a new local management plan to increase the ca- islation, the ‘Water Framework Directive’, by 2015. “More attention to pacity of a damaged fish pond. The goal was to naturally reduce ex- wetlands should make meeting this law easier for Danube countries.” cessive nutrient pollution from agriculture and communal sewage. A green buffer strip was set up, fish stocks improved, valuable wetland A recent survey, funded through the DRP, asked wetland and wa- plants were grown in a special lake enclosure and a public campaign ter managers throughout the basin about what they perceived to helped build local support. 7
  • 8. Water training for international students in Bulgaria FROM APRIL 11TH TO APRIL 24TH 2007 ENGREF-MONTPELLIER ORGANIZED a reasonable price for wastewater treatment, taking into account depreci- A TRAINING PROGRAM FOR POST-GRADUATE STUDENTS IN BULGARIA. ation costs. The study also gives short-term recommendations for operat- ing the plant until a sufficient amount of pollution is reached. ENGREF-Montpellier organized the training in association with the Bul- garian Academy of Science, the Bulgaria Water Partnership, the Regional The second case study took place in rural Bulgaria in the Saedinenie Mu- Inspectorate of the Environment and Water in Veliko Tarnovo and UBI- nicipality near Plovdiv. The first aspect was to carry out a technical and fi- FRANCE-Bulgaria nancial analysis of the water supply network, especially to propose some improvements in the supply capacity and energetic yield when necessary CREDIT: ENGREF and to draw up a long term financial sustainability analysis including de- preciation costs. The study also proposed several scenarios to clarify the role of the stakeholders. Furthermore, it presented their views on water prices and opportunities to obtain state funding in the future. The second aspects dealt with sanitation solutions for a village. The pur- pose of the study was to give a methodological framework of different solutions available to reduce the effect of domestic pollution in rural ar- eas and to apply it to Dragomir, a village in the Saedinenie Municipality. The proposed solution could be either individual such as dry toilets that are rather cheap and can be implemented in the short-term, or collective, such as a network and treatment plant with macrophyte reed bed filters, a much more expensive solution but more convenient if tourist develop- ment is being considered. ENGREF team with GWP Consulting Partners in Veliko Tarnovo The case studies were presented at the end of the two-week program in In France, ENGREF-Montpellier is part of AgroParisTech (Institute of Tech- Sofia during the World Water Day celebrations. The students called for nology for Life, Food and Environmental Sciences) and deals with post- a follow up of the training program in the future that could possibly in- graduation training programs focused on technical and non-technical as- clude young Bulgarian professionals and GWP partners. pects of water management. Guillem Canneva The students came from France, Moldova, Tunisia, China and Ireland. The canneva@Engref.Fr program provided a unique opportunity to work on a real case study while interacting with Bulgarian professionals, including GWP Bulgaria and their partners. 6th IWA Conference on Wastewater The case studies Reclamation and Reuse The first case study was the Gorna Oriahovitsa wastewater treatment plant. The treatment plant, financed by an EU grant (75%) and the Bulgarian gov- for Sustainability ernment (25%), was built to treat wastewater from 102, 000 people. It was THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL IWA SPECIALIST CONFERENCE ON WASTEWA- put into operation in August 2006. Unfortunately, the incoming wastewa- TER RECLAMATION AND REUSE FOR SUSTAINABILITY (WRRS 2007) WILL ter is far below what was expected and therefore the treatment plant is BE HELD IN ANTWERP (BELGIUM) ON 9TH-12TH OF OCTOBER, 2007. not working properly. The students were asked to investigate the sources of pollution, the operation of the treatment plant and the economic sus- Over the years, this biennial IWA water reuse conference has become tainability of the project. a major global platform to share best practice and discuss the latest de- velopments in the field of sustainable reuse of municipal and industrial The main results of this study was to recommend that the Gorna Oriaho- wastewater. An appointment not to miss by research institutions, com- vitsa Sugar Factory be connected to the sewage network after installing panies and organisations active in this sector, both in developed and a balancing tank, in order to increase the volume of incoming wastewa- developing countries. ter to bring the treatment plant back to normal operation in the mid-term. More information about the conference is available at www.wrrs2007.org. Furthermore, waste water from the Sugar Factory could help maintain Volume 7, Issue No. 1/2007, May 2007 Water Talk is the official newsletter of Global Water Partnership Central and Easter Europe (GWP CEE) published twice a year. Water Talk assists GWP CEE to promote principles of Integrated Water Resourc- es Management (IWRM) in the region of Central and Eastern Europe. The views and opinions expressed in Water Talk do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of GWP CEE. Publisher: GWP CEE - Global Water Partnership Central and Eastern Europe, gwpcee@shmu.sk, Editor: Richard Müller, Language Proofreading: Euro VKM, Ltd, Layout and Printing: TYPOCON, Ltd. Registration No: 3244/2004 ISSN: 1336-5525 GWP CEE – Global Water Partnership Central and Eastern Europe, c/o Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute, Jeseniova 17, 833 15 Bratislava, Slovakia, phone: +421 2 5941 5294, fax: +421 2 5941 5273, e-mail: gwpcee@shmu.sk, http://www.gwpceeforum.org 8