22. 22
Baûng 7: Moät soá saûn phaåm xi maêng nhöïa
Loaïi Saûn phaåm Truøng hôïp Heä thoáng adhesive Nhaø saûn xuaát
Total-etch
RelyX ARC Löôõng Adper Single Bond Plus 3M ESPE
RelyX Veneer Cement Quang Adper Single Bond Plus 3M ESPE
NX3 Nexus Third
Generation
Löôõng/quang OptiBond Solo Plus Kerr
Calibra Löôõng/quang Prime & Bond NT Dentsply
C&B Cement Hoùa One-Step Plus or
All-Bond 3
Bisco
Choice 2 Veneer Cement Quang One-Step Plus
All-Bond 3
Bisco
Duo-Link Löôõng One-Step Plus
All-Bond 3
Bisco
Variolink II Löôõng Excite F DSC
Syntac Classic
Ivoclar Vivadent
Variolink Veneer Quang Syntac Classic
Excite F
Ivoclar Vivadent
Duo Cement Plus Löôõng One Coat Bond Coltene/Whaledent
Self-etch
RelyX ARC Löôõng Adper Easy Bond 3M ESPE
NX3 Nexus Third
Generation
Löôõng/quang OptiBond All-In-One
OptiBond XTR
Kerr
Clearfil Esthetic Cement Löôõng Clearfil DC Bond Kuraray
Panavia 21 Hoùa ED primer Kuraray
Panavia F 2.0 Löôõng ED primer II Kuraray
C&B Cement Hoùa All-Bond SE Bisco
Duo-Link Löôõng All-Bond SE Bisco
Multilink Automix Hoùa Multilink Primer Ivoclar Vivadent
ParaCem Universal DC Löôõng ParaBond Coltene/Whaledent
Self-adhesive
RelyX Unicem 2 Automix Löôõng - 3M ESPE
Maxcem Elite Löôõng - Kerr
Clearfil SA Cement Löôõng - Kuraray
BisCem Löôõng - Bisco
SpeedCem Hoùa/ quang - Ivoclar Vivadent
23. 23
Baûng 8: Chæ ñònh cuûa caùc loaïi xi maêng gaén.
Phuïc hình ZnPO4 PC GIC RMGIC XM nhöïa
Maõo KL, maõo söù-KL ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Maõo söù eùp, inlay, veneer söù, caàu R
daùn
✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✓
Beänh nhaân coù tieàn söû nhaïy caûm R
sau ñieàu trò
- ✓ - - ✗
Caàu/maõo vôùi söï löu giöõ keùm ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✓
Choát vaø cuøi giaû ñuùc ✓ ✗ ✓ ✓ ✓
KL: kim loaïi XM: xi maêng ✓: chæ ñònh ✗: khoâng chæ ñònh.
Nguoàn: Ramaraju SD, Krishna RA, Ramaraju VA, Raju M. A Review of Conventional and
Contemporary Luting Agents Used in Dentistry. American Journal of Materials Science and
Engineering, 2014, 2(3), 28-35.
Baûng 9: Caùc tính chaát cuûa xi maêng gaén [1,2,3,8,10]
XM gaén
Sinh hoïc
(kích
thích tuûy)
Hoùa hoïc Löu bieán hoïc Vaät lyù
pH Ñoä tan/
nöôùc ôû
24h (%)
WT
(ph)
ST
(ph)
FT
(m)
CS
(MPa)
TS
(MPa)
MOE
(GPa)
BSD
(MPa)2 ph 24h
Phosphate keõm Naëng 2.14 6 0.2 max 3-6 5-9 ≤ 25 103.4 5-7 13 0
Polycarboxylate
keõm
Nheï 3.42 7 0.06 2.5-
3.5
6-9 25-48 55-90 8-12 4-5 2.1
GIC Nheï 2.33 5.68 0.4-1.5 2-4 6-9 22-24 90-220 6-7 8-11 3-5
RMGIC Nheï 3-5 0.07-0.4 2-4 5-6 10-22 85-126 13-24 2.5-7.8
10-12
14-20*
Compomer Thaáp 3 - 100 - 3.6 18-24*
Composite resin
Trung
bình
0.13 4-5 13-20
180-
265
34-37 4.4-6.5 18-30*
Adhesive resin
Trung
bình
- - > 25 52-224 37-41 1.2-10.7 -
WT (working time): thôøi gian laøm vieäc. ST (setting time): thôøi gian ñoâng.
FT (film thickness): ñoä daøy maøng. CS (compressive strength): ñoä beàn neùn.
TS (tensile strength): ñoä beàn caêng. MOE (modulus of elasticity): moâ ñun ñaøn hoài.
BSD (Bond strength to dentin): ñoä beàn lieân keát vôùi ngaø.
*: coù bonding agent.
24. 24
Baûng 10: Öu ñieåm vaø nhöôïc ñieåm cuûa caùc xi maêng gaén [1,2,3,10]
Xi maêng Öu ñieåm Nhöôïc ñieåm
ZnPO4
Ñoä beàn neùn toát.
Ñoä daøy maøng ñuû (25m).
Thôøi gian laøm vieäc thích hôïp.
Coù theå söû duïng ôû vuøng chòu löïc nhai lôùn
hoaëc caàu R daøi.
Tính acid cao.
Ñoä beàn caêng thaáp.
Khoâng coù lieân keát hoùa hoïc vôùi R.
Tan trong dòch mieäng.
Khoâng coù tính khaùng khuaån.
PC keõm
Töông hôïp sinh hoïc vôùi tuûy.
Ít tan trong nöôùc.
Daïng chaûy loûng.
Ñoä beàn caêng thuaän lôïi.
Lieân keát hoùa hoïc vôùi R.
Khoâng ñeà khaùng vôùi söï hoøa tan cuûa
acid.
Khoù thao taùc.
Bieán daïng döôùi taùc duïng cuûa löïc nhai.
GIC
Khaùng saâu R. Phoùng thích vaø haáp thu
fluoride töø moâi tröôøng mieäng.
Heä soá giaõn nôû do nhieät töông töï R.
Trong.
Ñeà khaùng vôùi söï hoøa tan cuûa acid.
Ñoä daøy maøng thaáp, duy trì ñöôïc ñoä nhôùt
khoâng ñoåi trong moät thôøi gian ngaén sau
troän giuùp gaén phuïc hình deã hôn.
Lieân keát hoùa hoïc vôùi R.
Söï ñoâng ban ñaàu chaäm.
Nhaïy caûm vôùi söï nhieãm aåm sôùm vaø söï
maát nöôùc.
Moâ ñun ñaøn hoài thaáp hôn XM phosphate
keõm, vì vaäy coù khaû naêng bò bieán daïng
ñaøn hoài ôû vuøng chòu löïc nhai lôùn.
EÂ buoát R sau gaén do pH ban ñaàu thaáp.
Khaùng moøn keùm.
RMGIC
Ñoä beàn (neùn, caêng vaø uoán) ñöôïc caûi thieän
ñaùng keå.
Ít nhaïy caûm hôn vôùi söï nhieãm nöôùc ban
ñaàu vaø söï maát nöôùc trong luùc ñoâng.
Ít tan hôn GIC. Deã thao taùc.
Ñoä daøy maøng ñuû thaáp.
Phoùng thích fluoride töông töï GIC.
Söï truøng hôïp khoâng bò aûnh höôûng ñaùng keå
bôûi vaät lieäu gaén taïm chöùa eugenol mieãn
laø xi maêng taïm ñöôïc loaïi boû hoaøn toaøn.
EÂ buoát sau gaén toái thieåu.
Ñoä beàn lieân keát vôùi ngaø aåm cao (14MPa).
Co khi ñoâng cöùng.
Haáp thu nöôùc nhieàu do söï hieän dieän cuûa
HEMA.
Maëc duø hieám, nhöng coù theå gaây dò öùng
do caùc monomer töï do.
Khoái xi maêng raát cöùng vaø khoù loaïi boû.
25. 25
Xi maêng
nhöïa
Ñoä beàn neùn vaø ñoä beàn caêng toát hôn.
Ñoä tan raát thaáp.
Lieân keát vi cô hoïc vôùi beà maët men, ngaø
ñöôïc söûa soaïn, hôïp kim vaø söù.
Coù nhieàu maøu saéc vaø ñoä trong.
Gaây kích thích tuûy ôû möùc naëng.
Ñoä daøy maøng lôùn.
Hôû bôø do söï co khi truøng hôïp.
Khoâng coù tính khaùng saâu R.
Moâ ñun ñaøn hoài thaáp vì vaäy khoâng theå
naâng ñôõ cho caàu R daøi.
Khoâng coù lieân keát hoùa hoïc vôùi R.
Khoù loaïi boû xi maêng thöøa ñaõ cöùng.
Xi maêng gaén taïm chöùa eugenol laøm öùc
cheá söï truøng hôïp hoaøn toaøn cuûa nhöïa.
Baûng 11: moät soá xi maêng gaén treân thò tröôøng
Söï töông taùc Loaïi xi maêng Teân thöông maïi (nhaø saûn xuaát)
Cô hoïc Phosphate keõm HY-Bond Zinc Phosphate (Shofu, USA).
Hoùa hoïc
Polycarboxylate keõm
Durelon (3M ESPE, USA).
HY-Bond Polycarboxylate (Shofu).
GIC
Ketac Cem (3M ESPE).
GC FujiCEM (GC America, USA).
RMGIC
RelyX Luting (3M ESPE).
RelyX Luting Plus (3M ESPE).
GC Fuji PLUS (GC America).
Xi maêng nhöïa self-adhesive
RelyX Unicem 2 (3M ESPE).
Maxcem Elite (Kerr, USA).
Biscem (Bisco, USA).
SpeedCem (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein).
Vi cô hoïc
Composite hoùa truøng hôïp
Panavia 21 (Kuraray, Japan).
C&B Cement (Bisco).
Composite quang truøng hôïp
Variolink Veneer (Ivoclar Vivadent).
Choice 2 (Bisco).
RelyX Veneer (3M ESPE).
Composite löôõng truøng hôïp
Panavia F 2.0 (Kuraray).
RelyX ARC (3M ESPE).
NX3 (Kerr).
Multilink Automix (Ivoclar Vivadent).
Variolink II (Ivoclar Vivadent).
Calibra (Dentsply).
Duo-Link (Bisco).
26. 26
Keát luaän
Öu vaø khuyeát ñieåm cuûa caùc loaïi xi maêng gaén khaùc nhau ñaõ ñöôïc thaûo luaän, vaø coù theå keát luaän
raèng khoâng coù moät vaät lieäu naøo laø hoaøn haûo. Söï löïa choïn xi maêng gaén neân döïa vaøo kieán thöùc
caên baûn veà caùc vaät lieäu coù saün, loaïi phuïc hình ñöôïc gaén, caùc yeâu caàu cuûa beänh nhaân, chuyeân
moân vaø kinh nghieäm cuûa baùc só. Vôùi tình traïng quaù nhieàu xi maêng gaén môùi traøn ngaäp treân thò
tröôøng, baùc só laâm saøng phaûi coù kieán thöùc ñaày ñuû ñeå giuùp choïn löïa vaät lieäu cho moãi tình huoáng
laâm saøng.
Taøi lieäu tham khaûo:
1. Anusavice KJ. Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials, WB Saunders Co., Philadelphia, 2003,
11th Edition, 443-493.
2. Rama Krishna Alla. Dental Materials Science, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Pvt
Limited, New Delhi, India, 2013, 1st Edition, 91-125.
3. Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials, Elsevier, Mosby,
Philadelphia, 2011, 12th
Edition, 327-348.
4. Smith DC. A new dental cement. Br. Dent. J, 124(9), 381-384, Nov 1968.
5. McCabe JF, Angus W.G. Walls. Applied Dental Materials, Blackwell publishing company,
UK, 2008, 9th Edition, 273-287.
6. Ferrance JF. Materials in Dentistry: Principles and Applications. Lippincott Williams and
Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2nd edition, 2001, 59-116.
7. Powers JM. Self-adhesive resin cements: characteristics, properties, and manipulation.
Functional Esthetics & Restorative Dentistry. 2008;1:34–6.
8. RG Craig, JM Powers. Restorative dental materials, 11th ed. St Louis:Mosby. 2002:594–
634.
9. TE Donovan, GC Cho. Contemporary evaluation of dental cements. Compend Contin Educ
Dent. 1999;20(3):197–219.
10. O'Brien WJ. Dental materials and their selection, 3rd ed. Chicago:
Quintessence. 2002:133–155.
11. AD Wilson, JW Nicholson. Acid-base cements, their biomedical and industrial
applications. New York:Cambridge University Press. 1993:1–383.
12. EE Hill, B Rubel. Vital tooth cleaning for cementation of indirect restorations: a
review. Gen Dent. 2009;57:392–395.
13. GJ Mount. An atlas of glass-ionomer cements: a clinicians guide, 3rd ed. New York:Martin
Duntiz. 2002:1–73.
14. AM Diaz-Arnold, MA Vargas, DR Haselton. Current status of luting agents for fixed
prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81(2):135–141.
15. RW Phillips, ML Swartz, RD Norman. Materials for the practicing dentist. St
Louis:Mosby. 1969:53–54.
16. TA Pegoraro, NR da Silva, RM Carvalho. Cements for use in esthetic dentistry. Dent Clin
North Am. 2007;51:453–471.
27. 27
17. GJ Christensen. Reducing the confusion about resin cements. Clin Rep. 2008;1:1–3.
18. D McComb. Adhesive luting cements – classes, criteria, and usage. Compend Contin Educ
Dent. 1996;17:759–773.
19. CS Petrie, JD Eick, K Williams, P Spencer. A comparison of three alloy surface treatments
for resin-bonded prostheses. J Prosthodont. 2001;10:217–223.
20. Rosensteil SF, et al. Dental luting agents: a review of the current literature. J Prosthet
Dent. 1998;80:280.
21. Rosensteil SF, Rashid RG. Post cementation hypersensitivity: scientific data versus
dentists’ perceptions. J Prosthodont. 2003;12:73.
22. El-Mowafy O. The use of resin cements in restorative dentistry to overcome retention
problems. J Can Dent Assoc. 2001;67:97–102.
23. Kendzoir GM, Leinfelder KF. Characteristics of zinc phosphate cements mixed at sub-zero
temperatures [Abstract no.134]. J Dent Res. 1976;55(Special Issue B):B95.
24. Alex G. Preparing porcelain surfaces for optimal bonding. Functional Esthetics and
Restorative Dentistry. 2008;1:38–46.
25. Pisani-Proenca J, Erhardt MC, Valandro LF, et al. Influence of ceramic surface
conditioning and resin cements on microtensile bond strength to a glass ceramic. J Prosthet
Dent. 2006;96;412–7.
26. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Blatz U. The effect of silica coating followed by an application of
silane significantly improves the resin cement bond to the intaglio surface of Procera
AllCeram restorations. Quint Int. 2003 Jul–Aug;34(7):542–7.
27. Pelogia F, Valandro LF, Brigagao V, Neisser MP, Bottino MA. Resin microtensile bond
strength to feldspathic ceramic: hydrofluoric acid etching vs. tribochemical silica coating.
Int J Prosthodont. 2007 Sep–Oct;20(5):532–4.
28. Atsu SS, Kilicarslan MA, Kucukesmen HC, Aka PS. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic
surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2006
Jun;95(6):430–6.
29. 3M ESPE. Rocatec bonding. Scientific product profile. 3M ESPE: 12/2001.
30. El-Mowafy OM, Fenton AH, Forrester N, Milenkovic M. Retention of metal ceramic
crowns cemented with resin cements: effects of preparation taper and height. J Prosthet
Dent. 1996;76(5):524–9.
31. Cakir D, Prentice TE, Ramp L, Burgess JO. Retention of zirconia crowns bonded with
seven adhesive cements. J Dent Research (AADR Abst # 0842), 2008.
32. Hess D, et al. Tensile bond of cemented fiber posts. J Dent Res. 2008;(AADR Abst #
0374).
33. Stanford C, Dawson D, Geraldeli S, Wefel JS, Timmons S, et al. Three-year follow-up
outcomes of bonded ceramic posterior restorations. J Dent Res. 2008;(Abst # 0540).
34. Robles AA, Yaman P, Dennison JB, Neiva GF, Razzoog ME. Allceramic restorations luted
with a self-etching adhesive: two-year report. J Dent Res. 2008;(AADR Abst # 0671).
35. P Baldissara, G Comin, F Martone, R Scotti. Comparative study of the marginal leakage of
six cements in fixed provisional crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:417–422.
28. 28
36. EE Hill. Dental cements for definitive luting: a review and practical clinical
considerations. Dent Clin North Am. 2007;51:643–658.
37. SF Rosenstiel, MF Land, BJ Crispin. Dental luting agents: a review of the current
literature. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80(3):280–301.
38. Combe EC. Notes on dental materials, Longman Group Limited, 1986 5th edition.
39. Ebru SUMER, Yalcin DEGER, Contemporary Permanent Luting Agents used in Dentistry:
A Literature Review, Int Dent Res, 1(1), 26-31, 2011.
40. Gosavi SS, Gosavi SY, Alla RK, Local and Systemic Effects of Unpolymerised
Monomers, Dent Res J, 7(2), 82-87, Summer-Autumn 2010.
41. Bowen RL, Properties of a silica-reinforced polymer for dental restorations, J Am Dent
Assoc, 66, 57-64, Jan 1963.
42. Ravi RK, Alla RK, Shammas M, Devarhubli A, Dental Composties – A Versatile
Restorative material: An Overview, Ind J Dent Sci, 5(5), 111-115, Dec 2013.
43. Pameijer, A Review of luting agents, Int J Dent, 2012: 1-7. Article ID 752861.
44. Wang XY, Yap AU, Ngo HC, Effect of early water exposure on the strength of glass
ionomer restoratives, Oper Dent, 31(5), 584-589, Sep-Oct2006.
45. Ravi RK, Alla RK, Shammas M, Ramesh KSV, Non-Carious lesions due to tooth surface
loss: A Review, Dental Era – A Journal of Dentistry, 3(3), 35-40, Jul-Sept 2013.
46. Timothy WF (1916) The Dental Review. Our present cements with special reference to
those containing copper, vol XXX, No. 8, Chicago, pp 691–704
47. Overman PR. Biofilm: a new view of plaque. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2000;1(3):1–8.
48. Anderson JN, Paffenbarger GC. Properties of silicophosphate cements. D
Progress. 1962;2:72–75.
49. Hembree JH, George TA, Hembree ME. Film thickness of cements beneath complete
crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;39:533–535.
50. Smith DC. Development of glass-ionomer cement systems. Biomaterials. 1998;19(6):467–
478.
51. Luckie S. Oxide of zinc and eugenol. Items D Int. 1898;20(July):490–491.
52. Weiss MB. Improved zinc oxide-eugenol cement. Illinois D J. 1958;27(4):261–271.
53. Roland N, Kutscher AH, Ayres HD. Effect of dicalcium phosphate on the crushing strength
of zinc-oxide eugenol cement. New York State D J. 1959;25(2):84–86.
54. Brauer GM, Simon L, Sangermano L. Improved zinc oxide-eugenol type cements. J Dent
Res. 1962;41(5):1096–1102.
55. Brauer GM, McLaughin R, Huget EF. Aluminium oxide as reinforcing agent for zinc-oxide
eugenol-o-ethoxybenzoic acid cements. J Dent Res. 1968;47(4):622–628.
56. Brauer GM. A review of zinc-oxide eugenol type filling materials and cements. Rev Belge
Med Dent. 1965;20(3):323–364.
57. Mesu FP, Reedijk T. Degradation of luting cements measured in vitro and in vivo. J Dent
Res. 1983;62:1236–1240.
58. Smith DC. Dental cements. Current status and future prospects. Dent Clin North
Am. 1983;6(3):763–793.
29. 29
59. Rosentiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: a review of the current
literature. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80(3):280–301.
60. Oilo G. Luting cements: a review and comparison. Int Dent J. 1991;41:81–88.
61. McLean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD. Proposed nomenclature for glass-ionomer dental
cements and related materials. Quintessence Int. 1994;25(9):587–589.
62. Longworth R. The structure and properties of ionomers. In: Wilson AD, Prosser HJ,
editors. Developments in ionic polymers-1. Barking: Applied Science Publishers; 1983.
63. McLean JW. Glass-ionomer cements. Br Dent J. 1988;164:293–300.
64. Um CM, Oilo G. The effect of early water contact on glass-ionomer cements. Quitessence
Int. 1992;23:209–214.
65. Mojon P, Kaltio R, Feduik D, Hawbolt EB, MacEntee MI. Short-term contamination of
luting cements by water and saliva. Dent Mater. 1996;12:83–87.
66. Ogimoto T, Ogawa T. Simple and sure protection of crown margins from moisture in
cementation. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:225.
67. Hornsby PR. Dimensional stability of glass-ionomer cements. J Chem Tech
Biotechnol. 1980;30:595–601.
68. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Fundamentals of fixed
prosthodontics.3. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc; 1997. pp. 385–415.
69. Mitchem JC, Gronas DG. Clinical evaluation of cement solubility. J Prosthet
Dent. 1978;40:453.
70. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current status of luting agents for fixed
prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81(2):135–141.
71. Christensen RP, Christensen GJ. Resin reinforced glass ionomer (RRGI) cements, all-
ceramic crown fracture. Clin Res Assoc Newsl. 1996;20(11):3.
72. Johnson GH, Hazelton LR, Bales DJ, et al. The effect of resin-based sealer on crown
retention for three types of cement. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91(5):428–435.
73. Meyer JM, Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V. Compomers-between glass-ionomer cements
and composites. Biomaterials. 1998;19(6):529–539.
74. Mount GJ. An atlas of glass-ionomer cements, a clinicians guide. 3. New York: Martin
Dunitz; 2002. pp. 1–73.
75. Richard van N. Introduction to dental materials. London: Mosby; 2002. pp. 257–278.
76. Tjan AHL, Tao L. Seating and retention of complete crowns with a new adhesive resin
cement. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67(4):478–483.
77. Ertugrul HZ, Ismail YH. An in vitro comparison of cast metal dowel retention using various
luting agents and tensile loading. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;93(5):446–452.
78. Sailer I, Oendra AE, Stawarczyk B, Hammerle CH. The effects of desensitizing resin,
resin sealing, and provisional cement on the bond strength of dentin luted with
selfadhesive and conventional resincements. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2012; 107:
252-260.
30. 30
79. Bagis B, Bagis YH, Hasanreisoglu U. Bonding effectiveness of a selfadhesive resin-based
luting cement to dentin after provisional cement contamination. Journal of Adhesive
Dentistry. 2011; 13: 543-550.
80.Ladha K, Verma M. Conventional and contemporary luting cements: an overview. Journal
of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2010; 10: 79-88.
81. Sillas Duarte, Neimar Sartori, Avishai Sadan, Jin-Ho Phark. Adhesive Resin Cements for
Bonding Esthetic Restorations: A Review. Quintessence of Dental Technology,
2011;34:40-66.
82. Hashimoto M, Tay FR, Svizero NR, et al. The effects of common errors on sealing ability
of total-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2006;22:560–568.
83. Hashimoto M, Sano H, Yoshida E, et al. Effects of multiple adhesive coatings on dentin
bonding. Oper Dent 2004;29:416–423.
84. Yiu CK, Pashley EL, Hiraishi N, et al. Solvent and water retention in dental adhesive
blends after evaporation. Biomaterials 2005;26:6863–6872.
85. Ikeda T, De Munck J, Shirai K, et al. Effect of evaporation of primer components on
ultimate tensile strengths of primer-adhesive mixture. Dent Mater 2005;21:1051–1058.
86. Tay FR, Frankenberger R, Krejci I, et al. Single-bottle adhesives behave as permeable
membranes after polymerization. I. In vivo evidence. J Dent 2004;32:611–621.
87. Chersoni S, Acquaviva GL, Prati C, et al. In vivo fluid movement through dentin adhesives
in endodontically treated teeth. J Dent Res 2005;84:223–227.
88. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, J de M, K L VL. State of the art of
self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27:17–28.
89. Van Landuyt KL, Mine A, De Munck J, et al. Are one-step adhesives easier to use and
better performing? Multifactorial assessment assessment of contemporary one-step self-
etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2009;11:175–190.
90. Perdigao J, Dutra-Correa M, Anauate-Netto C, et al. Two-year clinical evaluation of self-
etching adhesives in posterior restorations. J Adhes Dent 2009;11:149–159.
91. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B.
Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: A systematic review of current clinical
trials. Dent Mater 2005;21:864–881.
92. Sarr M, Kane AW, Vreven J, et al. Microtensile bond strength and interfacial
characterization of 11 contemporary adhesives bonded to bur-cut dentin. Oper Dent
2010;35:94–104.
93. Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Mine A, Cardoso MV, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B.
Filler debonding & subhybrid-layer failures in self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res
2010;89:1045–1050.
94. Hashimoto M, Ito S, Tay FR, et al. Fluid movement across the resin-dentin interface during
and after bonding. J Dent Res 2004;83:843–848.
95. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Garcia-Godoy F, Yiu CK. Single-step, selfetch adhesives behave as
permeable membranes after polymerization. Part II. Silver tracer penetration evidence.
Am J Dent 2004;17:315–322.
31. 31
96. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are
permeable membranes. J Dent 2002;30:371–382.
97. Carvalho RM, Pegoraro TA, Tay FR, Pegoraro LF, Silva NR, Pashley DH. Adhesive
permeability affects coupling of resin cements that utilise self-etching primers to dentine. J
Dent 2004;32:55–65.
98. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B.
Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater
2004;20:963–971.
99. Goracci C, Cury AH, Cantoro A, Papacchini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond
strength and interfacial properties of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements used to
lute composite onlays under different seating forces. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:327–335.
100. Han L, Okamoto A, Fukushima M, Okiji T. Evaluation of physical properties and surface
degradation of self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater J 2007;26:906–914.
101. Gerth HU, Dammaschke T, Zuchner H, Schafer E. Chemical analysis and bonding
reaction of RelyX Unicem and Bifix composites—A comparative study. Dent Mater
2006;22:934–941.
102. Fukuda R, Yoshida Y, Nakayama Y, et al. Bonding efficacy of polyalkenoic acids to
hydroxyapatite, enamel and dentin. Biomaterials 2003;24:1861–1867.
103. Al-Assaf K, Chakmakchi M, Palaghias G, Karanika-Kouma A, Eliades G. Interfacial
characteristics of adhesive luting resins and composites with dentine. Dent Mater
2007;23:829–839.
104. Hikita K, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, et al. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting
agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2007;23:71–80.
105. Pavan S, dos Santos PH, Berger S, Bedran-Russo AK. The effect of dentin pretreatment
on the microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements. J Prosthet Dent
2010;104:258–264.
106. Monticelli F, Osorio R, Mazzitelli C, Ferrari M, Toledano M. Limited
decalcification/diffusion of self-adhesive cements into dentin. J Dent Res 2008;87:974–
979.
107. Sarr M, Mine A, De Munck J, et al. Immediate bonding effectiveness of contemporary
composite cements to dentin. Clin Oral Investig 2010;14:569–577.
108. Viotti RG, Kasaz A, Pena CE, Alexandre RS, Arrais CA, Reis AF. Microtensile bond
strength of new self-adhesive luting agents and conventional multistep systems. J Prosthet
Dent 2009;102:306–312.
109. Escribano N, de la Macorra JC. Microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive luting
cements to ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:337–341.
110. Hiraishi N, Yiu CK, King NM, Tay FR. Effect of pulpal pressure on the microtensile bond
strength of luting resin cements to human dentin. Dent Mater 2009;25:58–66.
111. Duarte S, Jr, Botta AC, Meire M, Sadan A. Microtensile bond strengths and scanning
electron microscopic evaluation of self-adhesive and self-etch resin cements to intact and
etched enamel. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:203–210.