The Indian Dental Academy is the Leader in continuing dental education , training dentists in all aspects of dentistry and offering a wide range of dental certified courses in different formats.
Indian dental academy provides dental crown & Bridge,rotary endodontics,fixed orthodontics,
Dental implants courses.for details pls visit www.indiandentalacademy.com ,or call
0091-9248678078
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Bio mechanics of Space closure in orthodontics /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental academy
1. INDIAN DENTAL ACADEMY
Leader in continuing dental education
www.indiandentalacademy.com
3
www.indiandentalacademy.com
2. Mushroom loop
o
Apical addition of wire in archial configuration
o
More patient friendly- reduces the horizontal part
of wire near vestibule
o
Beta-titanium CNA M loop- 0.017 x 0.025
o
Activation upto 5 mm
o
Reactivation- every 6-8 wks
o
Bypass premolars, IBD
www.indiandentalacademy.com
3. o
Single cuspid retraction, en masse anterior
retraction
o
NiTi intrusion arch, tied piggyback to SS archwire
www.indiandentalacademy.com
4. o
Preformed M loop space closing archwires
o
Preactivation- separating the legs by 3mm.
Gable bends- mesial to increase anterior moment
distal to increase anchorage moment
o
Torque in distal leg eliminated- wire passive in third
order in buccal segment
o
Loop reactivated until there is atleast 3 mm of space
closure
o
After space closure, wire left in mouth for 1-2 visitsroot uprightingwww.indiandentalacademy.com
6. Double keyhole loop
o
Roth treatment mechanics
o
Introduced by John Parker- 0.019 x 0.026
o
Concept
Complete space closure with one set of archwires
Allows operator to select how space will be closed
Activation- cinching wire distal to last molar tube
www.indiandentalacademy.com
7. PG Retraction Spring
o
Poul Gjessing- 1985
o
Controlled tipping- uprightingover long periods of activation
o
Net result- bodily movement
o
Preformed-0.016 x 0.022 SS
o
Double ovoid apical helix- 10mm
o
Smaller occlusally placed helixactivation further closes the loops
www.indiandentalacademy.com
8. o Segment of circle in distal leg- eliminate undesirable
moments acting on 2nd premolar
www.indiandentalacademy.com
9. PG Retraction Spring
o
For canine retraction- 160gms
o
Double helix separated by 1mm
o
Resist tipping & rotational tendencies
-not correct rotation or extreme inclination
o
Leveling of buccal segment –must
o
Activation- every 4 wks
o
Each activation- 1.5mm of controlled movement
www.indiandentalacademy.com
10. PG Retraction Spring
o
Controlled incisor retraction
o
Auxiliary molar tube- lateral incisor bracket
o
Twist anterior leg 90˚ - 3mm in front of vertical
helix- fit in vertical tube of lateral bracket
o
Intrusive force- 12-25gms each side
o
Estimated treatment time- 5-6 months on an avg
www.indiandentalacademy.com
11. o
Used for retraction of both canine and incisors
o
Incisor segment intrusion- 20-25gms/side
o
Mesial and distal extensions angulated to build in
residual moments
o
Vertical forces in the posterior segment
counteracted by forces of occlusion
www.indiandentalacademy.com
12. Opus loop
o
Described by Raymond E. Siatkowski
o
M/F for translation
Individual teeth: 7.1-10.2 mm
Groups of teeth: 8.0-9.1 mm
o
Most closing loops M/F 4-5 mm
o
To achieve net translation, add residual moment
Gable bends anterior & posterior
Posterior gable band & anterior wire-bracket
twist
www.indiandentalacademy.com
13. Opus loop
Disadvantage of gable bend
o
Tipping- translation- uprighting
o
Correct magnitude of residual moments are
difficult to achieve
o
Changing areas of stress distribution in the pdl
may not yield most rapid, least traumatic method
of space closure
www.indiandentalacademy.com
14. Opus loop
o
Study: design and verify loop design capable of
delivering M/F inherently without adding residual
moments.
o
Castigliano’s Theorem: to derive of M/F ratio in
terms of loop geometry.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
15. Standard Opus 70 loop
M/F ratio on both the ends is equal
www.indiandentalacademy.com
18. K-SIR LOOP
o
K-SIR – Kalra Simultaneous Intrusion and Retraction
o
Continuous 0.019 x 0.025 TMA archwire
o
Closed loop- 7mm x 2mm
www.indiandentalacademy.com
21. K-SIR LOOP
o
Trial activation- releases stress built up
o
Reduces the severity of V bend
Neutral position
www.indiandentalacademy.com
22. K-SIR LOOP
o
Second premolar bypassed- IBD
o
Controlled tipping- bodily-root movement
o
Reactivation 6-8 wks
www.indiandentalacademy.com
23. K-SIR LOOP
Advantages
o
Simplicity of design- ease of fabrication
o
Comfortable to the patient
o
TMA- low forces, low LDR, long range of action
o
En masse retraction- Shortens treatment timeprevents appearance of unsightly space distal to
incisors.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
24. A comparative analysis of commonly used retraction
loops in Edgewise mechanics- A FEM Study. Dr.
Chetan V. Jayade
Evaluate mechanical behavior of routinely used
retraction loops in edgewise mechanotherapy
9 different loop designs evaluated for assessing
M/F ratio and F/D rates when subjected to
horizontal activation forces
www.indiandentalacademy.com
25. o
Findings of the study
o
Opus loop showed highest M/F ratio
o
‘T’ loop showed lowest LDR
o
Loop height= M/F = F/D rate
www.indiandentalacademy.com
26. Loops Software
o
Program developed by Borland Delphi
o
Simulate any ortho loop connecting 2 brackets
o
AJO 1997- Demetrios Halazonetis
www.indiandentalacademy.com
28. Obstacles to space closure
o
Inadequate leveling
o
Damaged brackets
o
Incorrect force levels
o
Interference from opposing teeth
o
Soft tissue resistance
www.indiandentalacademy.com
29. Root Torquing
o
Stage III- correction of labio-lingual & mesiodistal root position
o
Torquing assessed by
Visual inspection of appearance of teeth
Palpation of roots
From radiographs
www.indiandentalacademy.com
33. Uprighting springs
o
Size of coil
o
Mini spring- inner diameter of coil- twice the size of
wire diameter- coils tiny- difficult to grip
o
Midi spring- incisors 0.010”,canines-0.012”
o
Maxi spring- 4 times wire diameter
www.indiandentalacademy.com
36. Torquing of rootso
Torquing of roots- twist in the rectangular wire
o
“The equal and opposite reciprocal reactions
(which generally cause undesirable opposite
movements of adjacent teeth) are commonly
disregarded”.
o
Biomechanics of torque- An FEM investigationDr. V. P. Jayade
www.indiandentalacademy.com
39. Torquing of rootso
Twists in the rectangular archwire seem to be
appropriate only when reciprocal torque is
required on the adjacent teeth, but beware of high
moments. (‘Use undersize wires’- Thurow)
o
“twists” in the rectangular wire for attaining
torque should be employed judiciously, and not
indiscriminately.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
53. References
1.
Contemporary orthodontics.- William R. Proffit
2.
Modern Edgewise mechanics and the segmented
arch technique.-Dr. Charles J. Burstone
3.
Biomechanics in clinical orthodontics- Ravindra
Nanda
4.
Biomechanics and Esthetic strategies in clinical
orthodontics- ravindra Nanda
5.
Biomechanics in clinical orthodontics- Michael R.
Marcotte
www.indiandentalacademy.com
54. References
6.
Systemized Orthodontic Treatment Mechanics.McLaughlin, Bennett, Trevisi.
7.
Tip-Edge guide and Differential straight- arch
technique.-Peter C. Kesling
8.
Refined Begg for modern times.- Dr. V. P. Jayade
9.
The Alexander Principle. Contemporary concepts
and principles.- R. G. Wick Alexander
10. Bio-Efficient
11.
Therapy.- Anthony Viazis
Fricker
www.indiandentalacademy.com
55. References
11.
The segmented arch approach to space closure.
Charles J. Burstone. Ajo Nov 1982
12.
Segmental approach to mandibular molar
uprighting.- Roberts, Cracker, Burstone 1982 mar
13.
Biomechanical design and clinical evaluation of new
canine retraction spring. Poul Gjessing. AJO May
1985
14.
Effect of ph on chain elastics- AJO 1990 nov
15.
Use of vertical loops in retraction system- Apr 1991
16.
Clinical considerations in the use of retraction
mechanics. Julie Ann Stagger, JCO June 1991
www.indiandentalacademy.com
56. References
17.
An investigation into the characteristics of PG canine
retraction spring. Eden and Waters. AJO Jan.1994
18.
T-loop position and anchorage control. Kuhlberg and
Burstone. AJO 1997
19.
Design and test orthodontic loops using your
computer. Demetrious J. Halazonetis. AJO Mar 1997
20.
Ongoing Innovations in Biomechanics & Materials for
the New Millennium- Robert P. Kusy
21.
Simultaneous intrusion and retraction of anterior
www.indiandentalacademy.com
teeth. Varun Kalra. JCO 1998
57. References
21.
J- Hook Headgear- John Hickam
22.
Continuous arch wire closing loop design,
optimization, and verification. Part I & II. Raymond
E. Siatkowski. AJO Oct. 1997
22.
A comparative analysis of commonly used retraction
loops in Edgewise mechanics- A FEM Study. Dr.
Chetan V. Jayade
23.
Experimental evaluation of frictional resistance in
the posterior segment using different wires and
posterior attachments- Dr. Ashwini Joshi
www.indiandentalacademy.com