"Winning Horizon2020 with Open Science" (doi 10.5281/zenodo.12247) brief was integrated in Marie Curie ETNs and Societal Challenge 2 & 5 proposals in order to test whether Open Science can give applicants a competitive edge. These slides offer preliminary extracts from 2015-2016 Evaluation Summary Reports (ESR).

1. Does #OpenScience matter
at Proposal Evaluation?
Ivo Grigorov, DTU
Nordic Open Science and Research Forum, 22 November 2016

4. … but at grassroots level …

5. Could proposal
evaluation be an
Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247
effective incentive

7. Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247
We reduced FOSTER
partners know-how into
15 pages of advice …

8. Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247

9. Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247
… aiming to enhance
the standard Research
Lifecycle from this …

10. IDEA &
PROPOSAL
TEST
DATA
MODEL
CODE
PUBLISHEDUCATE
& TRAIN
RESEARCH
LIFECYCLE
Peer-
review
Impact Factor
(IF)
“Research Cycle” adapted from Tenopir et al., (2011) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101

11. Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247
… into this …

12. IDEA &
PROPOSAL
TEST
DATA
MODEL
CODE
Gold &
Green OA
EDUCATE
& TRAIN
REF Evaluation,
Impact Factor (IF),
Societal Impact,
Open Innovation
CO-CREATION
Open
Notebook
Science
RDM,
Archive &
Publish
Curate &
Publish
OS key part
of concept
Open
Educational
Resources
RESEARCH
LIFECYCLE
www.fosteropenscience.eu
PUBLISH

13. Advisory Board, May 2015
… then we took it
around the EU!

14. Does #OpenScience
matter at
proposal evaluation
Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247

15. “Weakness: highly focused on academic activities, and
lacks an advanced communication strategy”
Excellence
Impact
Implementation
“data accessibility is unclear!”
“data storage & access not considered”
“Open Access to scientific knowledge is an essential
principle in the project, but there is not enough
information on data management or IPR.”
Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247

16. “Strengths: extensive dissemination of data to the scientific
community (open access, databases)”
“outreach activities to a broad audience”
“research software is freely available”
“The communication plan is very effective. Training for
communication and open access procedures are especially
welcome.”
Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247
Impact:

17. “new knowledge delivered to SMEs by depositing research outputs in
OpenAIRE2020 and EMODNet”
“Data management is based on INSPIRE Directive that will
favour open access for environmental data and open publications”
“web-based decision support system (with open code) to make it available
to a wide, but targeted audience”
Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247
Impact:

18. @ fosterscience
# fosteropenscience
ivgr @ aqua.dtu.dk
Good Luck with
Horizon2020!
Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science,
http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247