10. LIPOPROTEINS
• 5 classes classified
based on the density
• TG transported in
chylomicrons or
VLDLs
• Cholesterol
transported as
cholesteryl esters in
LDLs and HDLs
16. OVERVIEW OF CURRENT DRUGS (1/2)
DRUG CLASS MOA SIDE EFFECTS
HMG CoA reductase
inhibitors
Lovastatin (10-80mg)
Simvastatin (5-40mg)
Atorvastatin (10-80mg)
Rosuvastatin (5-20mg)
↓ CH synthesis by
inhibition of rate
limiting HMG-CoA
reductase
Myositis, myalgia,
Elevated hepatic
transaminases,
Sleep disturbance,
Head ache, nausea
Bile acid sequestrants
Cholestyramine (4-16g)
Colestipol (5-30g)
↓ bile acid absorption,
↑ hepatic conversion
of CH to bile acids, ↑
LDL receptors on
hepatocytes
Unpalatability,
bloating,
constipation, heart
burn
17. OVERVIEW OF CURRENT DRUGS (2/2)
DRUG CLASS MOA SIDE EFFECTS
PPAR alpha activators
Gemfibrozil (1200mg)
Bezafibrate (600mg)
Fenofibrate (200mg)
↑ Activity of lipoprotein
lipase, ↑ VLDL
metabolism, ↑ oxidation
of FA in muscle &
adipose tissue, ↓ TG
synthesis in liver
Nausea, skin rash,
1-2% ↑ incidence
of gall stones
Nicotinic acid (2-6g) ↓ Production of VLDL, ↓
lipolysis in adipocytes
Flushing, nausea,
gluc intolerance,
abnormal LFT,
hyperuricemia
19. STATINS (2/3)
• Metabolized by microsomal enzymes except
pravastatin
• CI: pregnancy, lactation
• Potency : rosuvastatin > atorvastatin > simvastatin >
pravastatin & lovastatin
• Lovastatin: First clinically used statin, prodrug
Extensive first pass metab; excreted in bile
• Simvastatin: Greater rise in HDL, prodrug
Extensive first pass metab; Better oral
absorption
20. STATINS (3/3)
• Pravastatin: CH lowering effect is less; ↓ plaque
Decrease in fibrinogen level
• Atorvastatin: Long acting (t ½ = 18-24 hr)
Highest LDL-C lowering
Antioxidant & antiinflammatory
• Rosuvastatin: Most potent
Greater LDL-C reduction
• Pitavastatin: Latest; no specific advantage
21. ASCOT-LLA TRIAL
Sever PS, Dahlöf B, Poulter NR, et al. prevention of coronary and stroke events with
atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower than average cholesterol
concentrations in the Anglo-Scandinavian cardiac outcomes trial – lipid Lowering arm (LLA):
a multicentre randomised controlled trial. LANCET 2003; 361:1149
Participants 10305 hypertensive patients (aged 40-79 years; at least
3 CV risk factors) in ASCOT trial with non-fasting total
cholesterol concentrations 6.5 mmol/L or less
Intervention Atorvastatin 10mg vs placebo
End point non-fatal myocardial infarction and fatal CHD
Conclusions 100 events vs 154 in placebo (HR 0.64, p=0.0005).
Strokes, total CV events & coronary events were
significantly lowered in statin arm
22. JUPITER TRIAL
Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and
women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(21):2195
Participants 17,802 healthy pts with LDL-C < 130 mg/dl but hs-CRP
of 2.0 mg/l or higher
Intervention rosuvastatin, 20 mg daily, or placebo
End point Composite end point of MI, stroke, arterial
revascularization, hospitalization for unstable angina,
or death from cardiovascular causes
Conclusions ↓ incidence of major CVS events. ↓ LDL-C 50% &
↓hs-CRP 37%
23. 4S TRIAL
Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the
Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study. Lancet 1994; 344 (8934): 1383
Participants 4444 patients with angina pectoris or previous MI &
serum cholesterol 5.5-8.0 mmol/L on a lipid-lowering
diet
Intervention Simvastatin or placebo
End point Lipid profile improvement and CVD outcomes
Conclusions mean changes in TC, LDL-C, HDL-C of -25%, -35%, and
+8%, resp. 37% reduction (p<0.00001) in the risk of
undergoing myocardial revascularisation procedures.
Improved survival in CHD patients
24. PROVE-IT
Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH et al. Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with
statins after acute coronary syndromes N Engl J Med. 2004;350(15):1495
Participants 4162 patients hospitalized for ACS within the preceding
10 days
Intervention 40 mg pravastatin OD (std therapy) vs 80 mg
atorvastatin OD (intensive therapy)
End point Composite of death from any cause, MI, documented
unstable angina requiring rehospitalization,
revascularization (at least 30 days after randomization),
& stroke
Conclusions 16% reduction in the hazard ratio in atorvastatin.
Intensive lipid-lowering statin regimen greater survival
25. BILE ACID SEQUESTRANTS
• Secondary effect on cholesterol synthesis actually
VLDL
• Hyper- TG may limit use
• Used in combination with a statin
• Important interactions – bind polar drugs such as
warfarin, digoxin, thyroxine and statins
• Colesevelam (625mg 3 tab BD) – newer drug;
better tolerated
26. FIBRATES (1/2)
• Most effective at reducing VLDL (TG); smaller in
LDL-C ; useful in HDL-C
• Less favourable effect on clinical outcomes
• Improvements in microvascular outcomes
• Important interactions
Increased risk of myositis on a statin
reduction in dose requirements (~30%) for patients on
warfarin
27. FIBRATES (2/2)
• Fenofibrate: prodrug – t ½ 20 hr
Reduce fibrinogen levels
Commonly used in combination with statins (minimally
affects statin metab & ↓ myopathy)
• Gemfibrozil:
Reduces TG & CH
Increased risk of myopathy with statin
• Bezafibrate:
No myopathy
28. FIELD TRIAL
Keech A, Simes RJ, Barter P et al. Effects of long-term fenofibrate
therapy on cardiovascular events in 9795 people with type 2 diabetes
mellitus (the FIELD study): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005,
366:1849-61
Participants 9795 pts (2131 with previous CVD & 7664 without)
aged 50-75 years, with type 2 diabetes mellitus not
taking statin therapy
Intervention Micronised fenofibrate 200 mg OD vs Placebo
End point Coronary events (CHD death or non-fatal MI). For
subgroup analysis - Total cardiovascular events (CVD
death, MI, stroke, coronary & carotid revascularisation)
Conclusions Significant reduction in TGs. Reduction in total CV
events. No significant reduction in coronary events
29. ACCORD TRIAL
Ginsberg HN, Elam MB, Lovato LC et al. Effects of combination lipid
therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2010, 362:1563-74
Participants 5518 pts - type 2 diabetes on simvastatin treatment
Intervention Fenofibrate vs placebo.
End point First occurrence of nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, or
death from CV causes.
Conclusions Combination therapy did not reduce the rate of fatal
CV events, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke. 30% ↓ in
TG. ↓ progression in Retinopathy
30. NICOTINIC ACID
• VLDL & fibrinogen; ↑ HDL 30-35%; TGs ~ 40%
• Usually employed in combination with fibrate, resin
or statin – this avoids side effects of higher doses
31. AIM – HIGH TRIAL
Boden WE, Probstfield JL, Anderson T et al. Niacin in patients with low
HDL cholesterol levels receiving intensive statin therapy. N Engl J Med
2011; 365:2255-2267
Participants 3414 established CVD, low HDL-C, high TG
Intervention ER niacin 1.5 – 2.0g vs placebo. All patients received
simvastatin 40-80mg/d ± ezetimibe 10mg/d
End point 1st event of the composite of death from CHD,
nonfatal MI, ischemic stroke, hospitalization for ACS
or symptom-driven coronary or cerebral
revascularization
conclusions Among ASCVD pts with LDL <70mg/dl – no benefit
despite Improvements in HDL-C and TG
32. HPS-2 THRIVE TRIAL
Landray MJ, Haynes R, Hopewell JC et al. Effects of extended-release
niacin with laropiprant in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2014;
371:203-212
Participants 25,673 adults with vascular disease.
Prerandomization run-in phase to standardize the
background statin-based LDL-C lowering therapy
Intervention ER Niacin 2g + 40mg Laropiprant vs placebo
End point First major vascular event (nonfatal MI, death from
coronary causes, stroke, or arterial revascularization)
Conclusions In ASCVD, no significant reduction in major vascular
events but increased serious ADE
33. EZETIMIBE-STEROL ABSORPTION
INHIBITOR
• Inhibits CH absorption from intestine
• Novel inhibitor of intestinal cholesterol transporter
(NPC1C1)
• No important adverse effects or significant drug
interactions
• Statins decrease liver CH synthesis but increase
intestinal absorption. Ezetimibe vice versa
(synergistic)
• Unlike resins, it causes fall in TG
34. IMPROVE – IT TRIAL
Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP et al. Ezetimibe Added to
Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes. N Engl J Med.
2015;372(25):2387
Participants 18,144 pts hospitalized for ACS in last 10 days
LDL-C 50-100mg/dl if receiving lipid-lowering
therapy or 50-125mg/dl if not receiving
Intervention Simvastatin 40 mg + ezetimibe 10 mg vs simvastatin
40 mg + placebo
End point Composite of CVD, nonfatal MI, unstable angina
requiring rehospitalization, coronary
revascularization, or nonfatal stroke
Conclusions Lowering of LDL-C and improved CV outcomes
40. APPROACHES TO PCSK 9
INHIBITION
• Monoclonal antibodies: RG-7652 and LY3015014
• Peptide mimics - Peptides that mimic the EGFA
domain of the LDLR that binds to PCSK9 (1D05-
IgG2 )
• Gene silencing:
PCSK9 antisense oligonucleotide, increases expression
of the LDLR
Locked nucleic acid – reduced PCSK9 mRNA
RNA interference (ALN PCS02)
• Naturally occurring inhibitors: Plant alkaloid
berberine & endogenous Annexin A2
41. ALIROCUMAB – PRALUENT
• First drug of PCSK9I to be approved (July24, 2015)
• Second line treatment for adults next to diet &
statin for clinical ASCVD & FH
• Side effects -
Nose & throat irritation
Injection site reactions and bruising
Flu-like symptoms
Diarrhoea
Bronchitis and cough
Muscle pain, soreness, and spasms
42. ODYSSEY TRIAL
Robinson JG, Farnier M, Krempf M et al. Efficacy and Safety of
Alirocumab in Reducing Lipids and Cardiovascular Events
Participants 2341 patients at high risk for CVD. LDL-C of 70 mg/dl or
more + receiving rx with statins at the maximum
tolerated dose, +/- other lipid-lowering therapy
Intervention Patients randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive
alirocumab (150 mg) or placebo as a 1-ml S/C every 2
weeks for 78 weeks
End point Percentage change in calculated LDL cholesterol level
from baseline to week 24
Conclusions At 24 weeks % change from baseline was 64%
(p<0.001) Over 78 weeks significant ↓ LDL-C. In a post
hoc analysis, evidence of ↓cardiovascular events
43. EVOLOCUMAB - REPHATHA
• PCSK9 inhibitor from Amgen
• FDA approval – 27 Aug 2015 (RUTHERFORD 1, 2 &
GAUSS trials)
• Pts with uncontrolled LDL-C on current Rx options
• Side effects:
Nasopharyngitis / URTI / flu
Back pain
Injection site reactions
• Ongoing trials GAUSS – 2,3 in Statin Intolerant &
FOURIER
44. APO B INHIBITOR – MIPOMERSEN
(KYNAMRO)
• Antisense oligonucleotide binds to mRNA; prevents
translation to form apolipoprotein-B
• Decreased formation of apoB-containing lipoproteins,
including LDL cholesterol (40-50%).
• Also decrease Lp(a) concentrations.
• Side effects:
Injection-site reactions in almost all
Influenza-like illness in many, and
hepatic steatosis with elevated liver enzymes in up to 15% of
patients
• Approved for homozygous familial
hypercholesterolemia, minimising apheresis need
45. MTTP INHIBITOR – LOMITAPIDE
(JUXPID)
• Inhibit TG transfer to apoB-48 or apoB-100 in
intestinal & liver cells respectively; decrease
formation of chylomicrons & VLDL.
• VLDL inhibition leads to LDL inhibition.
• Side effects: Increased stool frequency, hepatic
steatosis & increase in serum transaminase levels.
• FDA approval in Dec 2012 for homozygous familial
hypercholesterolemia.
46. CETP INHIBITORS
• Inhibit transfer of cholesterol from anti-atherogenic
apolipoprotein A – containing particles to
atherogenic apolipoprotein B particles
DRUG NAME TRIAL REMARKS
Torcetrapib
(with statins, ↑
HDL 60%, ↓
LDL 25%)
ILLUMINATE
(Terminated - ADR )
↑ all-cause mortality & cardiovascular
events, ↑ Sys BP by 5-6 mm Hg, ↑
aldosterone & cortisol, ↑ endothelial
NO synthase & endothelin I
Dalcetrapib
(↑ HDL 30%,
LDL no effect)
Dal-OUTCOMES
(Terminated - futility)
↑ Sys BP , smaller but significant
↑ CRP (inflammation)
47. THYROMIMETICS - EPRORITOME
• Thyroid hormone analog with minimal non-hepatic
tissue uptake
• No long term or large studies done so far
• No clinical hyper/hypo-thyroidism
• Side effect: elevated transaminases
48. MISCELLANEOUS DRUGS
• Probucol – ↓ LDL-C and HDL-C; facilitate resorption
of cutaneous & tendon xanthomas
• Neomycin – ↓ LDL-C & Lp(a) 25%; similar in action
to bile acid sequestrants
• Oestrogen Replacement therapy in post-
menopausal women - ↓ LDL-C ↑ HDL-C
• Tamoxifen - ↓ LDL-C & tot. CH. No effect on HDL
51. NCEP ATP III vs ACC/AHA
NCEP ATP III AHA/ACC – ATP IV
Year 2001 (updated in 2004) 2013
Focus Reducing CHD risk Reducing risk of
atherosclerotic CV disease
(ASCVD) – includes CHD +
TIA/stroke, PAD or
revascularisation
Risk
assessment
Framingham 10 yr risk score
(CHD death + non fatal MI
Pooled cohort equations*
(fatal & nonfatal CHD +
fatal & nonfatal stroke
*Developed by the Risk Assessment Work Group to estimate the 10-year ASCVD risk
(defined as first-occurrence nonfatal and fatal MI and nonfatal and fatal stroke) for the
identification of candidates for statin therapy
52. NCEP ATP III vs ACC/AHA
NCEP ATP III AHA/ACC – ATP IV
Risk
Categories
3 main risk categories:
CHD / CHD risk equivalent (DM,
Clinical CHD, symptomatic CAD,
PAD)
2+ risk factors & 10-yr risk ≤ 20%
0-1 risk factors & 10-yr risk <10%
4 statin benefit groups:
Clinical ASCVD
Primary LDL-C elevations ≥190
mg/dl
DM without clinical ASCVD
No DM/CVD with 10-yr ASCVD
risk ≥7.5%
Rx targets LDL-C primary target
<100mg/dl
<130mg/dl (<100 if risk 10-20%)
<160mg/dl
(in the order of categories
mentioned above)
Intensity of statin therapy
High intensity statin therapy
(LDL-C reduction ≥50%)
recommended for most
patients in 4 statin benefit
groups
Rx
recommen
dations
Statin (or bile acid sequestrants or
nicotinic acid) to achieve LDL-C
goal
Maximally tolerated statin
first-line to reduce risk of
ASCVD events
60. ACC/AHA COR LOE
1.Creatine Kinase, routinely not needed III (No benefit) A
2.Baseline CK in pts at risk of events IIa C
3.Baseline ALT before initiating statins I B
4.Decreasing the statin dose, if 2 consecutive
values of LDL-C <40 mg/dl.
IIb C
5.Simvastatin at 80 mg daily harmful III (Harm) A
6.New onset diabetes on statin therapy, continue
statins & lifestyle management
I B
7.If muscle symptoms develop, discontinue, use
again
II a C
8.Confusional state, evaluate non-statin causes II b C
SAFETY RECOMMENDATION OF
STATINS
61. NIACIN RECOMMENDATIONS
Baseline liver enzymes,
FBS/HBA1c/uric acid
AST/ALT >2-3ULN
Persistent severe cutaneous
symptoms,hyperglycemia,
acute gout
New onset AF,
weight loss
Start at low dose
Take niacin with food or
aspirin 325mg ½ hr BF
Uptitrate 500 mg ER to
2000mgER over 4-8 weeks (or)
Plain niacin 100mg TID to
3g/day
62. BILE ACID
SEQUESTRANTS
Baseline fasting TG
>300 mg/dl
caution if TG 250-299
mg/dl. 4-6 weeks later if TG
>400 -discontinue
STEROL ABSORPTION
INHIBITORS
Baseline hepatic
transaminases
Discontinue if ALT>3 times
occur
63. FIBRATES OMEGA 3 FATTY
ACIDS
If used in TG >, evaluate
GI disturbances,
Evaluate GI disturbances
Gemfibrozil + statin therapy
(causes muscle symptoms)
If TG>500mg/dl and
benefit>risks -Fenofib
GFR<30 ml/min
65. BOCOCIZUMAB (Pfizer)
• PCSK9 inhibitor
• Phase 2b - Monthly or bimonthly injections ↓ LDL-
C at 12 weeks. *
• SPIRE trials (Phase 3) - plans to enrol 17,000 pts.
Intolerant to statins
Hereditary heterozygous hypercholesterolemia
Primary hyperlipidemia/mixed dyslipidemia (3 trials)
At highrisk CVD (2 trials)
* Ballantyne CM, Neutel J, Cropp A et al. Results of Bococizumab, A Monoclonal
Antibody Against Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9, from a
Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study in Statin-Treated Subjects
With Hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol. 2015 May 1;115(9):1212-21.
66. RG7652 (Roche)
• Monoclonal antibody – PCSK9 inhibitor
• July 2013: Phase II EQUATOR trial completed
(unpublished)
• July 2014:
Discontinued - Phase-I; Metabolic disorders
(Switzerland)
Discontinued - Phase-II; Coronary disorders &
Hyperlipidaemia (USA, Canada, Czech Republic,
Germany, Hungary, New Zealand, Norway, Slovakia and
South Africa)
67. LY3015014 (Eli Lilly)
• Monocloncal antibody – PCSK9 inhibitor
• 3 Phase 2 trials completed by June 2014
• No liver / muscle safety issues
• Upto 51% ↓ in LDL-C, significant ↓ non-HDL-C,
ApoB and Lp(a)*
* Kastelein J, Nissen S; Rader D et al. Safety and Efficacy of LY3015014, a New
Monoclonal Antibody to Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9)
with an Inherently Longer Duration of Action, in Patients with Primary
Hypercholesterolemia: A Randomized, PlaceboControlled, Dose-Ranging, Phase 2
Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(10_S)
68. 1D05-IgG2
• Fragment antigen-binding (Fab) protein that mimics
EGFA domain of LDLR
• Current status: Preclinical studies
• Ts mouse model LDL-C ↓ 40% & ↑ hepatic LDLR
protein levels 5 fold.
• In healthy rhesus monkeys, LDL cholesterol ↓
20%–50% for over 2 weeks
*Ni YG, Di Marco S, Condra JH et al. A PCSK9-binding antibody that structurally
mimics the EGF(A) domain of LDL-receptor reduces LDL cholesterol in vivo. J
Lipid Res. 2011 Jan;52(1):78-86
69. ALN-PCS02 (Alnylam Pharma)
• siRNA against PCSK9 gene
• Phase 1 trail completed
• IV infusion for 32 patients
• Results officially not published
• However, significant impact on lipid management
70. PCSK9 VACCINE
• Virus like particle (VLP) – immunogenic carrier of PCSK9
antigenic peptide
• VLP – virus without DNA – no replication. External
structure – antigen display
• Animal studies showed high titre IgG antibodies
• Significant ↓ total cholesterol, TG & PL
* Crossey E, Amar MJ, Sampson M, Peabody J, Schiller JT, Chackerian B,
Remaley AT (2015). "A cholesterol-lowering VLP vaccine that targets
PCSK9". Vaccine 33(43): 5747–55
71. EVACETRAPIB – CETP inhibitor
• ACCELERATE trial – 12095 high risk CVD patients;
stopped prematurely (Oct 2015) for lack of efficacy
• ACCENTUATE trial – pts with hyperlipidemia or DM
72. ANACETRAPIB – CETP INHIBITOR
• DEFINE – Phase III trial*
1623 pt with CHD or at high risk on statins
100mg anacetrapib vs placebo
↑ HDL 138.1%, ↓LDL-C 36%, ↓Lp(a) 36.4% in
comparison with placebo by 24 weeks
No change in BP, Electrolyte or aldosterone by 76w
No ↑ in CVD events
• REVEAL – Phase III trial (ongoing) 30,000 pts with
occlusive arterial disease
* Cannon P, Shah S, Dansky HM et al. Safety of Anacetrapib in Patients with or at
High Risk for Coronary Heart Disease. NEJM 2010; 363:2406-2415
73. IMPLITAPIDE – MTTP INHIBITOR
• Two phase 2 trial terminated (2005)
• 80mg/160 mg doses caused unacceptable rise in
liver enzymes & GI disturbances *
• Trials with lower doses suggested
• No further details obtainable
*Dam MV, Farmer M, Stein EA et al. Efficacy an d safety of implitapide (bayy 13-
9952), a microsomal triglyceridee transfer protein inhibitor,, in patients with
primary hypercholesterolemia-accessed on 1/11/15 from
http://dare.uva.nl/document/2/14716
74. OTHER MTTP INHIBITORS
DRUG
(status as
of year)
REMARKS
CP346086
(2003)
Phase 2: 47% ↓total cholesterol, 72% ↓LDL-C,
75% ↓ TG
AEGR733 ↓LDL-C by 51% from baseline at the highest
dose. ↑ Liver aminotransferase & hepatic fat
accumulation
JTT130 Animal study: 25% ↓ LDL-C & 30% ↓ TG & No
hepatic steatosis. Current status – phase 2 trials
75. SUMMARY
• Lipid handling in the body & pathophysiology of
dyslipidemia & atherosclerosis
• Current hypolipidemic drugs – statins, BAS, fibrates
niacin, sterol absorption inhibitors
• Newer agents – PCSK9 inhibitors, MTTP inhibitors,
apo B inhibitor, CETP inhibitor, thyromimetics
• ACC/AHA 2013 guidelines - LDL-C targets are not
absolute as in ATPIII
• Drugs in the making
76. REFERENCES
• Tonkin A, Byrnes A. Treatment of dyslipidemia. F1000Prime
Reports. 2014;6:17
• Robert SR. Lipid lowering with drugs other than statins and
fibrates (accessed on 15/09/2015)
http://www.uptodate.com/contents/lipid-lowering-with-
drugs-other-than-statins-and-fibrates
• Robert SR. Lipid lowering with fibric acid derivatives.
(accessed on 15/09/2015)
http://www.uptodate.com/content/lipid-lowering-with-
fibric-acid-derivatives
• 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood
Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk
in Adults A Report of the American College of
Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on
Practice Guidelines. (accessed on 22/10/2015)
77. • Sahebkar A, Watts GF. New LDL-Cholesterol
Lowering Therapies: Pharmacology, Clinical Trials,
and Relevance to Acute Coronary Syndromes. Clin
Ther. 2013 Aug;35(8):1082-98
• For pipeline drugs status
(http://adisinsight.springer.com/drugs )
• For various trial details (https://clinicaltrials.gov)
Editor's Notes
2-monoaclyglycerol & fatty acids assemble to from TG. Cholesterol is converted into cholesteryl ester. These are assembled with apolipoprotein B-48 into nascent chylomicrons. These particles are then secreted into the lacteals in a process that depends heavily on apolipoprotein B-48. As they circulate through the lymphatic vessels, nascent chylomicrons bypass the liver circulation and are drained via the thoracic duct into the bloodstream
Exogenous pathway
In the blood stream, nascent chylomicron particles interact with HDL particles resulting in HDL donatation of apolipoprotein C-II and apolipoprotein E to the nascent chylomicron. The chylomicron at this stage is then considered mature. Via apolipoprotein C-II, mature chylomicrons activatelipoprtoein lipase (LPL), an enzyme on endothelial cells lining the blood vessels. LPL catalyzes the hydrolysis of triacyl glycerol that ultimately releases glycerol and fatty acids from the chylomicrons. Glycerol and fatty acids can then be absorbed in peripheral tissues, especially adipose and muscle, for energy and storage.
The hydrolyzed chylomicrons are now called chylomicron remnants. The chylomicron remnants continue circulating the bloodstream until they interact via apolipoprotein E with chylomicron remnant receptors, found chiefly in the liver. This interaction causes the endocytosis of the chylomicron remnants, which are subsequently hydrolyzed within lysosomes. Lysosomal hydrolysis releases glycerol and fatty acids into the cell, which can be used for energy or stored for later use.
Endogenous pathway
The liver is the central platform for the handling of lipids: it is able to store glycerols and fats in its cells, the hepatocytes. Hepatocytes are also able to create triacylglycerols via de novo synthesis. They also produce the bile from cholesterol.
In the hepatocytes, triacylglycerols and chlesteryl esters are assembled with aapolipoprotein B 100 to form nascent VLDL particles. Nascent VLDL particles are released into the bloodstream via a process that depends upon apolipoprotein B-100.
In the blood stream, nascent VLDL particles bump with HDL particles; as a result, HDL particles donate apolipoprotein C-II and apolipoprotein E to the nascent VLDL particle; Once loaded with apolipoproteins C-II and E, the nascent VLDL particle is considered mature.
Again, like chylomicrons, VLDL particles circulate and encounter LPL expressed on endothelial. Apolipoprotein C-II activates LPL, causing hydrolysis of the VLDL particle and the release of glycerol and fatty acids. These products can be absorbed from the blood by peripheral tissues, principally adipose and muscle. The hydrolyzed VLDL particles are now called VLDL remnants or IDLs. VLDL remnants can circulate and, via an interaction between apolipoprotein E and the remnant receptor, be absorbed by the liver, or they can be further hydrolyzed by hepatic lipase.
Hydrolysis by hepatic lipase releases glycerol and fatty acids, leaving behind IDL remnants, called LDL, which contain a relatively high cholesterol content. LDL circulates and is absorbed by the liver and peripheral cells. Binding of LDL to its target tissue occurs through an interaction between the LDL receptor and apolipoprotein B-100 on the LDL particle. Absorption occurs through endocytosis, and the internalized LDL particles are hydrolyzed within lysosomes, releasing lipids, chiefly cholesterol
LDL particles in blood plasma invade the endothelium and become oxidized. A complex set of biochemical reactions regulates the oxidation of LDL, involving enzymes (such as Lp-LpA2) and free radical in the endothelium. Damage to the endothelium results in an inflammatory response. This is followed by adherence of blood circulating monocytes to the vascular bed lining, the endothelium, then by their migration to the sub-endothelial space, and further activation into monocyte-derived macrophages. The monocytes differentiate into macrophages, which ingest oxidized LDL, slowly turning into large "foam cells" – so-called because of their changed appearance resulting from the numerous internal cytoplasmic vesicles and resulting high lipid content. Under the microscope, the lesion now appears as a fatty streak. Foam cells eventually die, and further propagate the inflammatory process. There is also smooth muscle proliferation and migration from the tunica media into the intima responding to cytokines secreted by damaged endothelial cells. This causes the formation of a fibrous capsule covering the fatty streak
Treatment was stopped after a median follow-up of 3.3 years. By that time, 100 primary events had occurred in the atorvastatin group compared with 154 events in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0.64 [95% CI 0.50-0.83], p=0.0005). This benefit emerged in the first year of follow-up. There was no significant heterogeneity among prespecified subgroups. Fatal and non-fatal stroke (89 atorvastatin vs 121 placebo, 0.73 [0.56-0.96], p=0.024), total cardiovascular events (389 vs 486, 0.79 [0.69-0.90], p=0.0005), and total coronary events (178 vs 247, 0.71 [0.59-0.86], p=0.0005) were also significantly lowered. There were 185 deaths in the atorvastatin group and 212 in the placebo group (0.87 [0.71-1.06], p=0.16). Atorvastatin lowered total serum cholesterol by about 1.3 mmol/L compared with placebo at 12 months, and by 1.1 mmol/L after 3 years of follow-up
The trial was stopped after a median follow-up of 1.9 years (maximum, 5.0). Rosuvastatin reduced LDL cholesterol levels by 50% and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels by 37%. The rates of the primary end point were 0.77 and 1.36 per 100 person-years of follow-up in the rosuvastatin and placebo groups, respectively (hazard ratio for rosuvastatin, 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 0.69; P<0.00001), with corresponding rates of 0.17 and 0.37 for myocardial infarction (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.70; P=0.0002), 0.18 and 0.34 for stroke (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.79; P=0.002), 0.41 and 0.77 for revascularization or unstable angina (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.70; P<0.00001), 0.45 and 0.85 for the combined end point of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.69; P<0.00001), and 1.00 and 1.25 for death from any cause (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.97; P=0.02). Consistent effects were observed in all subgroups evaluated. The rosuvastatin group did not have a significant increase in myopathy or cancer but did have a higher incidence of physician-reported diabetes
The relative risk of death in the simvastatin group was 0.70 (95% CI 0.58-0.85, p = 0.0003). The 6-year probabilities of survival in the placebo and simvastatin groups were 87.6% and 91.3%, respectively. There were 189 coronary deaths in the placebo group and 111 in the simvastatin group (relative risk 0.58, 95% CI 0.46-0.73), while noncardiovascular causes accounted for 49 and 46 deaths, respectively. 622 patients (28%) in the placebo group and 431 (19%) in the simvastatin group had one or more major coronary events. The relative risk was 0.66 (95% CI 0.59-0.75, p<0.00001), and the respective probabilities of escaping such events were 70.5% and 79.6%. This risk was also significantly reduced in subgroups consisting of women and patients of both sexes aged 60 or more. Other benefits of treatment included a 37% reduction (p<0.00001) in the risk of undergoing myocardial revascularisation procedures
The median LDL cholesterol level achieved during treatment was 95 mg per deciliter (2.46 mmol per liter) in the standard-dose pravastatin group and 62 mg per deciliter (1.60 mmol per liter) in the high-dose atorvastatin group (P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier estimates of the rates of the primary end point at two years were 26.3 percent in the pravastatin group and 22.4 percent in the atorvastatin group, reflecting a 16 percent reduction in the hazard ratio in favor of atorvastatin (P=0.005; 95 percent confidence interval, 5 to 26 percent). The study did not meet the prespecified criterion for equivalence but did identify the superiority of the more intensive regimen
Vital status was confirmed on all but 22 patients. Averaged over the 5 years' study duration, similar proportions in each group discontinued study medication (10% placebo vs 11% fenofibrate) and more patients allocated placebo (17%) than fenofibrate (8%; p<0.0001) commenced other lipid treatments, predominantly statins. 5.9% (n=288) of patients on placebo and 5.2% (n=256) of those on fenofibrate had a coronary event (relative reduction of 11%; hazard ratio [HR]0.89, 95% CI 0.75-1.05; p=0.16). This finding corresponds to a significant 24% reduction in non-fatal myocardial infarction (0.76, 0.62-0.94; p=0.010) and a non-significant increase in coronary heart disease mortality (1.19, 0.90-1.57; p=0.22). Total cardiovascular disease events were significantly reduced from 13.9% to 12.5% (0.89, 0.80-0.99; p=0.035). This finding included a 21% reduction in coronary revascularisation (0.79, 0.68-0.93; p=0.003). Total mortality was 6.6% in the placebo group and 7.3% in the fenofibrate group (p=0.18). Fenofibrate was associated with less albuminuria progression (p=0.002), and less retinopathy needing laser treatment (5.2%vs 3.6%, p=0.0003). There was a slight increase in pancreatitis (0.5%vs 0.8%, p=0.031) and pulmonary embolism (0.7%vs 1.1%, p=0.022), but no other significant adverse effects.
The annual rate of the primary outcome was 2.2% in the fenofibrate group and 2.4% in the placebo group (hazard ratio in the fenofibrate group, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 1.08; P=0.32). There were also no significant differences between the two study groups with respect to any secondary outcome. Annual rates of death were 1.5% in the fenofibrate group and 1.6% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.10; P=0.33). Prespecified subgroup analyses suggested heterogeneity in treatment effect according to sex, with a benefit for men and possible harm for women (P=0.01 for interaction), and a possible interaction according to lipid subgroup, with a possible benefit for patients with both a high baseline triglyceride level and a low baseline level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P=0.057 for interaction
At 2 years, niacin therapy had significantly increased the median HDL cholesterol level from 35 mg per deciliter (0.91 mmol per liter) to 42 mg per deciliter (1.08 mmol per liter), lowered the triglyceride level from 164 mg per deciliter (1.85 mmol per liter) to 122 mg per deciliter (1.38 mmol per liter), and lowered the LDL cholesterol level from 74 mg per deciliter (1.91 mmol per liter) to 62 mg per deciliter (1.60 mmol per liter). The primary end point occurred in 282 patients in the niacin group (16.4%) and in 274 patients in the placebo group (16.2%) (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.87 to 1.21; P=0.79 by the log-rank test).
Laropirant – prostaglandin receptor antagonist
During a median follow-up period of 3.9 years, participants who were assigned to extended-release niacin-laropiprant had an LDL cholesterol level that was an average of 10 mg per deciliter (0.25 mmol per liter as measured in the central laboratory) lower and an HDL cholesterol level that was an average of 6 mg per deciliter (0.16 mmol per liter) higher than the levels in those assigned to placebo. Assignment to niacin-laropiprant, as compared with assignment to placebo, had no significant effect on the incidence of major vascular events (13.2% and 13.7% of participants with an event, respectively; rate ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 1.03; P=0.29). Niacin-laropiprant was associated with an increased incidence of disturbances in diabetes control that were considered to be serious (absolute excess as compared with placebo, 3.7 percentage points; P<0.001) and with an increased incidence of diabetes diagnoses (absolute excess, 1.3 percentage points; P<0.001), as well as increases in serious adverse events associated with the gastrointestinal system (absolute excess, 1.0 percentage point; P<0.001), musculoskeletal system (absolute excess, 0.7 percentage points; P<0.001), skin (absolute excess, 0.3 percentage points; P=0.003), and unexpectedly, infection (absolute excess, 1.4 percentage points; P<0.001) and bleeding (absolute excess, 0.7 percentage points; P<0.001).
The median time-weighted average LDL cholesterol level during the study was 53.7 mg per deciliter (1.4 mmol per liter) in the simvastatin-ezetimibe group, as compared with 69.5 mg per deciliter (1.8 mmol per liter) in the simvastatin-monotherapy group (P<0.001). The Kaplan-Meier event rate for the primary end point at 7 years was 32.7% in the simvastatin-ezetimibe group, as compared with 34.7% in the simvastatin-monotherapy group (absolute risk difference, 2.0 percentage points; hazard ratio, 0.936; 95% confidence interval, 0.89 to 0.99; P=0.016). Rates of prespecified muscle, gallbladder, and hepatic adverse effects and cancer were similar in the two groups
Shan L, Pang L, Zhang R, Murgolo NJ, Lan H, Hedrick JA (October 2008). "PCSK9 binds to multiple receptors and can be functionally inhibited by an EGF-A peptide". Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 375 (1): 69–73.doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.07.106. PMID 18675252.
Jump up^ Graham MJ, Lemonidis KM, Whipple CP, Subramaniam A, Monia BP, Crooke ST, Crooke RM (April 2007). "Antisense inhibition of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 reduces serum LDL in hyperlipidemic mice".J. Lipid Res. 48 (4): 763–7. doi:10.1194/jlr.C600025-JLR200.PMID 17242417.
The best-known biological function of PCSK9 is regulation of cholesterol homeostasis via accelerating the degradation of LDL receptor (LDLR). This degradation is the result of direct binding of PCSK9 to LDLR (on the extracellular EGF-A domain), followed by clathrin-mediated cellular internalization. After endocytosis, PCSK9 decreases the LDLR density on the surface of hepatocytes either through inhibition of receptor recycling or through directing LDLR to lysosomal catabolism
Antisense therapy is a form of treatment for genetic disorders or infections. When the genetic sequence of a particular gene is known to be causative of a particular disease, it is possible to synthesize a strand of nucleic acid (DNA,RNA or a chemical analogue) that will bind to the messenger RNA (mRNA) produced by that gene and inactivate it, effectively turning that gene "off“
Locked nucleic acid - often referred to as inaccessible RNA, is a modified RNA nucleotide. The ribose moiety of an LNA nucleotide is modified with an extra bridge connecting the 2' oxygen and 4' carbon. The bridge "locks" the ribose in the 3'-endo (North) conformation, which is often found in the A-form duplexes
RNA interference (RNAi) is a biological process in which RNA molecules inhibit gene expression, typically by causing the destruction of specific mRNA molecules
At week 24, the difference between the alirocumab and placebo groups in the mean percentage change from baseline in calculated LDL cholesterol level was −62 percentage points (P<0.001); the treatment effect remained consistent over a period of 78 weeks. The alirocumab group, as compared with the placebo group, had higher rates of injection-site reactions (5.9% vs. 4.2%), myalgia (5.4% vs. 2.9%), neurocognitive events (1.2% vs. 0.5%), and ophthalmologic events (2.9% vs. 1.9%). In a post hoc analysis, the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (death from coronary heart disease, nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal or nonfatal ischemic stroke, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization) was lower with alirocumab than with placebo (1.7% vs. 3.3%; hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.90; nominal P=0.02)
Estel Grace Masangkay, "Amgen Phase III GAUSS-2 Trial of Evolocumab (AMG 145) Meets Co-Primary Endpoints Of LDL Cholesterol Reduction", Bioresearch Online (January 24 2014) Pierson, Ransdell (17 March 2014). "Amgen drug meets goal for those with high genetic cholesterol". Associated Press. Retrieved 19 March 2014.
This guideline recommends using the new Pooled Cohort Risk Assessment Equations developed by the Risk Assessment Work Group to estimate the 10-year ASCVD risk (acute coronary syndromes, a history of MI, stable or unstable angina, coronary or other arterial revascularization, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or peripheral arterial disease presumed to be of atherosclerotic origin) for the identification of candidates for statin therapy (see
http://my.americanheart.org/cvriskcalculator and http://www.cardiosource.org/en/Science-And-Quality/Practice-Guidelinesand-Quality-Standards/2013-Prevention-Guideline-Tools.aspx for risk calculator). These equations should be used to predict stroke as well as CHD events in non-Hispanic, Caucasian, and
African-American women and men 40 to 79 years of age with or without diabetes who have LDL-C levels 70 to 189 mg/dL and are not receiving statin therapy
Summary of Statin Initiation Recommendations for the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce ASCVD Risk in Adults
Colors correspond to the Classes of Recommendation in Table 1. Assessment of the potential for benefit and risk from statin therapy for ASCVD prevention provides the framework for clinical decision making incorporating patient preferences.
*Percent reduction in LDL-C can be used as an indication of response and adherence to therapy, but is not in itself a treatment goal. †The Pooled Cohort Equations can be used to estimate 10-year ASCVD risk in individuals With and without diabetes. The estimator within this application should be used to inform decision making in primary prevention patients Not on a statin.
‡Consider moderate-intensity statin as more appropriate in low-risk individuals.
§For those in whom a risk assessment is uncertain, consider factors such as primary LDL-C =160 mg/dL or other evidence of genetic hyperlipidemias, family history of premature ASCVD with onset <55 years of age in a first-degree male relative or <65 years of age in a first-degree female relative, hs-CRP =2 mg/L, CAC score =300 Agatston units, or =75th percentile for age, sex, and ethnicity (for additional information, see http://www.mesa-nhlbi. org/CACReference.aspx), ABI <0.9, or lifetime risk of ASCVD. Additional factors that may aid in individual risk assessment may be identified in the future.
‖Potential ASCVD risk-reduction benefits. The absolute reduction in ASCVD events from moderate- or high-intensity Statin therapy can be approximated by multiplying the estimated 10-year ASCVD risk by the anticipated relative-risk reduction from the Intensity of statin initiated (~30% for moderate-intensity statin or ~45% for high-intensity statin therapy). The net ASCVD risk-reduction benefit is estimated from the number of potential ASCVD events prevented with a statin, compared to the number of potential excess adverse effects.
¶Potential adverse effects. The excess risk of diabetes is the main consideration in ~0.1 excess cases per 100 individuals treated with a moderate-intensity statin for 1 year and ~0.3 excess cases per 100 individuals treated with a high-intensity statin for 1 year. In RCTs, both statin-treated and placebo-treated participants experienced the same rate of muscle symptoms. The actual rate of statin-related muscle symptoms in the clinical population is unclear. Muscle symptoms attributed to statin therapy should be evaluated (see Table 8, Safety Recommendation 8).
ABI indicates ankle-brachial index; ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CAC, coronary artery calcium; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MI, myocardial infarction; and RCT, randomized controlled trial.)