SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 77
CURRENT STATUS & RECENT
ADVANCES IN DYSLIPIDEMIA
TREATMENT
Dr. Jeffrey Pradeep Raj
Post-graduate
Dept. of Pharmacology – SJMC
02-11-2015
OUTLINE
• Introduction
• Lipid handling in the body
• Pathophysiology of atherosclerosis
• Current Hypolipidaemic drugs
• Newer Hypolipidaemic drugs
• ACC/AHA Clinical guidelines 2013
• Pipeline drugs
• Summary
INTRODUCTION
DYSLIPIDEMIA
• Disorder of Lipid & lipoprotein metabolism
• 3 primary abnormalities
Elevated triglycerides
Elevated LDL cholesterol
Reduced HDL cholesterol
• Most important modifiable risk factor for CAD
• Causes – Primary / secondary
PRIMARY DYSLIPIDEMIA
TYPE LIPID LIPOPROTEIN OCCURRENCE
I – Familial lipoprotein lipase
deficiency
TG Chylomicrons Rare
IIa – Familial
Hypercholesterolaemia
C LDL Common
IIb – Polygenic
hypercholestrolaemia
C, TG LDL, VLDL Most
common
III – Familial
dysbetalipoproteinaemia
C,TG IDL Rare
IV – Hypertriglyceridemia TG VLDL Common
V – Familial combined
hyperlipidaemia
TG VLDL,
chylomicrons
Rare
SECONDARY DYSLIPIDEMIA
LDL cholesterol Triglycerides HDL cholesterol
Diabetes mellitus
Hypothyroidism
Nephrotic syndrome
Obstructive liver
disease
Drugs
Anabolic steroids
Progestins
Beta blockers
Thiazides
Alcoholism
Diabetes mellitus
Hypothyroidism
Obesity
Renal insufficiency
Drugs
Beta blockers
Bile acid resins
Estrogens
Ticlopidine
Cigarette smoking
Diabetes mellitus
Hypertriglyceridemia
Menopause
Obesity
Puberty (in males)
Uraemia
Drugs
Anabolic steroids
Beta blockers
LIPID HANDLING IN THE
BODY
LIPID ABSORPTION
• Bile emulsifies fat in
chyme
• P. lipase coverts
Triacyl glyceryl into
FFA + glycerol
• Absorbed into
enterocyte rapidly
CHYLOMICRON ASSEMBLY
LIPOPROTEINS
• 5 classes classified
based on the density
• TG transported in
chylomicrons or
VLDLs
• Cholesterol
transported as
cholesteryl esters in
LDLs and HDLs
LIPOPROTEIN METABOLISM
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF
ATHEROSCLEROSIS
MECHANISM OF
ATHEROSCLEROSIS
CURRENT
HYPOLIPIDAEMIC DRUGS
CLASSIFICATION – CURRENT
DRUGS
• HMG – CoA reductase inhibitors
Lovastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, atorvastatin,
rosuvastatin, pitavastatin
• Bile acid sequestrants (resins)
Cholestyramine, colestipol
• Lipoprotein lipase activators (PPAR alpha activators)
Clofibrate, gemfibrozil, bezafibrate, fenofibrate
• Lipolysis and triglyceride synthesis inhibitor
Nicotinic acid
• Sterol absorption inhibitor
Ezetimibe
OVERVIEW OF CURRENT DRUGS (1/2)
DRUG CLASS MOA SIDE EFFECTS
HMG CoA reductase
inhibitors
Lovastatin (10-80mg)
Simvastatin (5-40mg)
Atorvastatin (10-80mg)
Rosuvastatin (5-20mg)
↓ CH synthesis by
inhibition of rate
limiting HMG-CoA
reductase
Myositis, myalgia,
Elevated hepatic
transaminases,
Sleep disturbance,
Head ache, nausea
Bile acid sequestrants
Cholestyramine (4-16g)
Colestipol (5-30g)
↓ bile acid absorption,
↑ hepatic conversion
of CH to bile acids, ↑
LDL receptors on
hepatocytes
Unpalatability,
bloating,
constipation, heart
burn
OVERVIEW OF CURRENT DRUGS (2/2)
DRUG CLASS MOA SIDE EFFECTS
PPAR alpha activators
Gemfibrozil (1200mg)
Bezafibrate (600mg)
Fenofibrate (200mg)
↑ Activity of lipoprotein
lipase, ↑ VLDL
metabolism, ↑ oxidation
of FA in muscle &
adipose tissue, ↓ TG
synthesis in liver
Nausea, skin rash,
1-2% ↑ incidence
of gall stones
Nicotinic acid (2-6g) ↓ Production of VLDL, ↓
lipolysis in adipocytes
Flushing, nausea,
gluc intolerance,
abnormal LFT,
hyperuricemia
STATINS (1/3)
Pleotropic effects: Non- lipid lowering, cardioprotective
STATINS (2/3)
• Metabolized by microsomal enzymes except
pravastatin
• CI: pregnancy, lactation
• Potency : rosuvastatin > atorvastatin > simvastatin >
pravastatin & lovastatin
• Lovastatin: First clinically used statin, prodrug
Extensive first pass metab; excreted in bile
• Simvastatin: Greater rise in HDL, prodrug
Extensive first pass metab; Better oral
absorption
STATINS (3/3)
• Pravastatin: CH lowering effect is less; ↓ plaque
Decrease in fibrinogen level
• Atorvastatin: Long acting (t ½ = 18-24 hr)
Highest LDL-C lowering
Antioxidant & antiinflammatory
• Rosuvastatin: Most potent
Greater LDL-C reduction
• Pitavastatin: Latest; no specific advantage
ASCOT-LLA TRIAL
Sever PS, Dahlöf B, Poulter NR, et al. prevention of coronary and stroke events with
atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower than average cholesterol
concentrations in the Anglo-Scandinavian cardiac outcomes trial – lipid Lowering arm (LLA):
a multicentre randomised controlled trial. LANCET 2003; 361:1149
Participants 10305 hypertensive patients (aged 40-79 years; at least
3 CV risk factors) in ASCOT trial with non-fasting total
cholesterol concentrations 6.5 mmol/L or less
Intervention Atorvastatin 10mg vs placebo
End point non-fatal myocardial infarction and fatal CHD
Conclusions 100 events vs 154 in placebo (HR 0.64, p=0.0005).
Strokes, total CV events & coronary events were
significantly lowered in statin arm
JUPITER TRIAL
Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and
women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(21):2195
Participants 17,802 healthy pts with LDL-C < 130 mg/dl but hs-CRP
of 2.0 mg/l or higher
Intervention rosuvastatin, 20 mg daily, or placebo
End point Composite end point of MI, stroke, arterial
revascularization, hospitalization for unstable angina,
or death from cardiovascular causes
Conclusions ↓ incidence of major CVS events. ↓ LDL-C 50% &
↓hs-CRP 37%
4S TRIAL
Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the
Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study. Lancet 1994; 344 (8934): 1383
Participants 4444 patients with angina pectoris or previous MI &
serum cholesterol 5.5-8.0 mmol/L on a lipid-lowering
diet
Intervention Simvastatin or placebo
End point Lipid profile improvement and CVD outcomes
Conclusions mean changes in TC, LDL-C, HDL-C of -25%, -35%, and
+8%, resp. 37% reduction (p<0.00001) in the risk of
undergoing myocardial revascularisation procedures.
Improved survival in CHD patients
PROVE-IT
Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH et al. Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with
statins after acute coronary syndromes N Engl J Med. 2004;350(15):1495
Participants 4162 patients hospitalized for ACS within the preceding
10 days
Intervention 40 mg pravastatin OD (std therapy) vs 80 mg
atorvastatin OD (intensive therapy)
End point Composite of death from any cause, MI, documented
unstable angina requiring rehospitalization,
revascularization (at least 30 days after randomization),
& stroke
Conclusions 16% reduction in the hazard ratio in atorvastatin.
Intensive lipid-lowering statin regimen greater survival
BILE ACID SEQUESTRANTS
• Secondary effect on cholesterol synthesis actually 
VLDL
• Hyper- TG may limit use
• Used in combination with a statin
• Important interactions – bind polar drugs such as
warfarin, digoxin, thyroxine and statins
• Colesevelam (625mg 3 tab BD) – newer drug;
better tolerated
FIBRATES (1/2)
• Most effective at reducing VLDL (TG); smaller  in
LDL-C ; useful  in HDL-C
• Less favourable effect on clinical outcomes
• Improvements in microvascular outcomes
• Important interactions
Increased risk of myositis on a statin
reduction in dose requirements (~30%) for patients on
warfarin
FIBRATES (2/2)
• Fenofibrate: prodrug – t ½ 20 hr
Reduce fibrinogen levels
Commonly used in combination with statins (minimally
affects statin metab & ↓ myopathy)
• Gemfibrozil:
Reduces TG & CH
Increased risk of myopathy with statin
• Bezafibrate:
No myopathy
FIELD TRIAL
Keech A, Simes RJ, Barter P et al. Effects of long-term fenofibrate
therapy on cardiovascular events in 9795 people with type 2 diabetes
mellitus (the FIELD study): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005,
366:1849-61
Participants 9795 pts (2131 with previous CVD & 7664 without)
aged 50-75 years, with type 2 diabetes mellitus not
taking statin therapy
Intervention Micronised fenofibrate 200 mg OD vs Placebo
End point Coronary events (CHD death or non-fatal MI). For
subgroup analysis - Total cardiovascular events (CVD
death, MI, stroke, coronary & carotid revascularisation)
Conclusions Significant reduction in TGs. Reduction in total CV
events. No significant reduction in coronary events
ACCORD TRIAL
Ginsberg HN, Elam MB, Lovato LC et al. Effects of combination lipid
therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2010, 362:1563-74
Participants 5518 pts - type 2 diabetes on simvastatin treatment
Intervention Fenofibrate vs placebo.
End point First occurrence of nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, or
death from CV causes.
Conclusions Combination therapy did not reduce the rate of fatal
CV events, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke. 30% ↓ in
TG. ↓ progression in Retinopathy
NICOTINIC ACID
•  VLDL & fibrinogen; ↑ HDL 30-35%;  TGs ~ 40%
• Usually employed in combination with fibrate, resin
or statin – this avoids side effects of higher doses
AIM – HIGH TRIAL
Boden WE, Probstfield JL, Anderson T et al. Niacin in patients with low
HDL cholesterol levels receiving intensive statin therapy. N Engl J Med
2011; 365:2255-2267
Participants 3414 established CVD, low HDL-C, high TG
Intervention ER niacin 1.5 – 2.0g vs placebo. All patients received
simvastatin 40-80mg/d ± ezetimibe 10mg/d
End point 1st event of the composite of death from CHD,
nonfatal MI, ischemic stroke, hospitalization for ACS
or symptom-driven coronary or cerebral
revascularization
conclusions Among ASCVD pts with LDL <70mg/dl – no benefit
despite Improvements in HDL-C and TG
HPS-2 THRIVE TRIAL
Landray MJ, Haynes R, Hopewell JC et al. Effects of extended-release
niacin with laropiprant in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2014;
371:203-212
Participants 25,673 adults with vascular disease.
Prerandomization run-in phase to standardize the
background statin-based LDL-C lowering therapy
Intervention ER Niacin 2g + 40mg Laropiprant vs placebo
End point First major vascular event (nonfatal MI, death from
coronary causes, stroke, or arterial revascularization)
Conclusions In ASCVD, no significant reduction in major vascular
events but increased serious ADE
EZETIMIBE-STEROL ABSORPTION
INHIBITOR
• Inhibits CH absorption from intestine
• Novel inhibitor of intestinal cholesterol transporter
(NPC1C1)
• No important adverse effects or significant drug
interactions
• Statins decrease liver CH synthesis but increase
intestinal absorption. Ezetimibe vice versa
(synergistic)
• Unlike resins, it causes fall in TG
IMPROVE – IT TRIAL
Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP et al. Ezetimibe Added to
Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes. N Engl J Med.
2015;372(25):2387
Participants 18,144 pts hospitalized for ACS in last 10 days
LDL-C 50-100mg/dl if receiving lipid-lowering
therapy or 50-125mg/dl if not receiving
Intervention Simvastatin 40 mg + ezetimibe 10 mg vs simvastatin
40 mg + placebo
End point Composite of CVD, nonfatal MI, unstable angina
requiring rehospitalization, coronary
revascularization, or nonfatal stroke
Conclusions Lowering of LDL-C and improved CV outcomes
NEWER
HYPOLIPIDAEMIC DRUGS
CLASSIFICATION - NEWER DRUGS
• Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9
(PCSK9) inhibitors – Evolocumab, bococizumab,
Alirocumab
• Apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibitor – Mipomersen
• Microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTTP)
inhibitor – Lopitamide
• Thyromimetic – Eprotirome
• Cholestryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors –
Torcetrapib, dalcetrapib
PCSK9 INHIBITORS
• Inhibit proprotein convertase subtilisn/kexin type 9
• Increases LDLR density on hepatocytes
• Prevents LDLR degradation
PSCK9 - PHYSIOLOGY
PCSK9 ACTION
APPROACHES TO PCSK 9
INHIBITION
• Monoclonal antibodies: RG-7652 and LY3015014
• Peptide mimics - Peptides that mimic the EGFA
domain of the LDLR that binds to PCSK9 (1D05-
IgG2 )
• Gene silencing:
PCSK9 antisense oligonucleotide, increases expression
of the LDLR
Locked nucleic acid – reduced PCSK9 mRNA
RNA interference (ALN PCS02)
• Naturally occurring inhibitors: Plant alkaloid
berberine & endogenous Annexin A2
ALIROCUMAB – PRALUENT
• First drug of PCSK9I to be approved (July24, 2015)
• Second line treatment for adults next to diet &
statin for clinical ASCVD & FH
• Side effects -
Nose & throat irritation
Injection site reactions and bruising
Flu-like symptoms
Diarrhoea
Bronchitis and cough
Muscle pain, soreness, and spasms
ODYSSEY TRIAL
Robinson JG, Farnier M, Krempf M et al. Efficacy and Safety of
Alirocumab in Reducing Lipids and Cardiovascular Events
Participants 2341 patients at high risk for CVD. LDL-C of 70 mg/dl or
more + receiving rx with statins at the maximum
tolerated dose, +/- other lipid-lowering therapy
Intervention Patients randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive
alirocumab (150 mg) or placebo as a 1-ml S/C every 2
weeks for 78 weeks
End point Percentage change in calculated LDL cholesterol level
from baseline to week 24
Conclusions At 24 weeks % change from baseline was 64%
(p<0.001) Over 78 weeks significant ↓ LDL-C. In a post
hoc analysis, evidence of ↓cardiovascular events
EVOLOCUMAB - REPHATHA
• PCSK9 inhibitor from Amgen
• FDA approval – 27 Aug 2015 (RUTHERFORD 1, 2 &
GAUSS trials)
• Pts with uncontrolled LDL-C on current Rx options
• Side effects:
Nasopharyngitis / URTI / flu
Back pain
Injection site reactions
• Ongoing trials GAUSS – 2,3 in Statin Intolerant &
FOURIER
APO B INHIBITOR – MIPOMERSEN
(KYNAMRO)
• Antisense oligonucleotide binds to mRNA; prevents
translation to form apolipoprotein-B
• Decreased formation of apoB-containing lipoproteins,
including LDL cholesterol (40-50%).
• Also decrease Lp(a) concentrations.
• Side effects:
Injection-site reactions in almost all
Influenza-like illness in many, and
hepatic steatosis with elevated liver enzymes in up to 15% of
patients
• Approved for homozygous familial
hypercholesterolemia, minimising apheresis need
MTTP INHIBITOR – LOMITAPIDE
(JUXPID)
• Inhibit TG transfer to apoB-48 or apoB-100 in
intestinal & liver cells respectively; decrease
formation of chylomicrons & VLDL.
• VLDL inhibition leads to LDL inhibition.
• Side effects: Increased stool frequency, hepatic
steatosis & increase in serum transaminase levels.
• FDA approval in Dec 2012 for homozygous familial
hypercholesterolemia.
CETP INHIBITORS
• Inhibit transfer of cholesterol from anti-atherogenic
apolipoprotein A – containing particles to
atherogenic apolipoprotein B particles
DRUG NAME TRIAL REMARKS
Torcetrapib
(with statins, ↑
HDL 60%, ↓
LDL 25%)
ILLUMINATE
(Terminated - ADR )
↑ all-cause mortality & cardiovascular
events, ↑ Sys BP by 5-6 mm Hg, ↑
aldosterone & cortisol, ↑ endothelial
NO synthase & endothelin I
Dalcetrapib
(↑ HDL 30%,
LDL no effect)
Dal-OUTCOMES
(Terminated - futility)
↑ Sys BP , smaller but significant
↑ CRP (inflammation)
THYROMIMETICS - EPRORITOME
• Thyroid hormone analog with minimal non-hepatic
tissue uptake
• No long term or large studies done so far
• No clinical hyper/hypo-thyroidism
• Side effect: elevated transaminases
MISCELLANEOUS DRUGS
• Probucol – ↓ LDL-C and HDL-C; facilitate resorption
of cutaneous & tendon xanthomas
• Neomycin – ↓ LDL-C & Lp(a) 25%; similar in action
to bile acid sequestrants
• Oestrogen Replacement therapy in post-
menopausal women - ↓ LDL-C ↑ HDL-C
• Tamoxifen - ↓ LDL-C & tot. CH. No effect on HDL
CLINICAL GUIDELINES
EVOLUTION OF NHBLI SUPPORT
GUIDELINES
Current guidelines ACC/AHA 2013
NCEP ATP III vs ACC/AHA
NCEP ATP III AHA/ACC – ATP IV
Year 2001 (updated in 2004) 2013
Focus Reducing CHD risk Reducing risk of
atherosclerotic CV disease
(ASCVD) – includes CHD +
TIA/stroke, PAD or
revascularisation
Risk
assessment
Framingham 10 yr risk score
(CHD death + non fatal MI
Pooled cohort equations*
(fatal & nonfatal CHD +
fatal & nonfatal stroke
*Developed by the Risk Assessment Work Group to estimate the 10-year ASCVD risk
(defined as first-occurrence nonfatal and fatal MI and nonfatal and fatal stroke) for the
identification of candidates for statin therapy
NCEP ATP III vs ACC/AHA
NCEP ATP III AHA/ACC – ATP IV
Risk
Categories
3 main risk categories:
CHD / CHD risk equivalent (DM,
Clinical CHD, symptomatic CAD,
PAD)
2+ risk factors & 10-yr risk ≤ 20%
0-1 risk factors & 10-yr risk <10%
4 statin benefit groups:
Clinical ASCVD
Primary LDL-C elevations ≥190
mg/dl
DM without clinical ASCVD
No DM/CVD with 10-yr ASCVD
risk ≥7.5%
Rx targets LDL-C primary target
<100mg/dl
<130mg/dl (<100 if risk 10-20%)
<160mg/dl
(in the order of categories
mentioned above)
Intensity of statin therapy
High intensity statin therapy
(LDL-C reduction ≥50%)
recommended for most
patients in 4 statin benefit
groups
Rx
recommen
dations
Statin (or bile acid sequestrants or
nicotinic acid) to achieve LDL-C
goal
Maximally tolerated statin
first-line to reduce risk of
ASCVD events
CLASS OF RECOMMENDATION
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
AHA/ACC GUIDELINE 2013 (1/2)
AHA/ACC GUIDELINE 2013 (2/2)
CV RISK CALCULATOR
HIGH INTENSITY THERAPY MODERATE INTENSITY
THERAPY
LOW INTENSITY THERAPY
Daily dose lowers LDL-C
on avg ~ ≥50%
Daily dose lowers LDL –C
on avg ~ 30-50%
Daily dose lowers LDL –C
<30%
Atorvastatin (40*) 80 mg Atorvastatin 10 (20) mg Simvastatin 10 mg
Rosuvastatin 20 (40) mg Rosuvastatin (5) 10 mg Pravastatin 10-20 mg
Simvastatin 20-40 mg Lovastatin 20 mg
Pravastatin 40 (80) mg Fluvastatin 20-40 mg
Lovastatin 40 mg Pitavastatin 1 mg
Fluvastatin XL 80 mg
* Only one RCT Fluvastatin 40 mg bid
Pitavastatin 2-4 mg
STATIN THERAPY
MONITORING THERAPY
ACC/AHA COR LOE
1.Creatine Kinase, routinely not needed III (No benefit) A
2.Baseline CK in pts at risk of events IIa C
3.Baseline ALT before initiating statins I B
4.Decreasing the statin dose, if 2 consecutive
values of LDL-C <40 mg/dl.
IIb C
5.Simvastatin at 80 mg daily harmful III (Harm) A
6.New onset diabetes on statin therapy, continue
statins & lifestyle management
I B
7.If muscle symptoms develop, discontinue, use
again
II a C
8.Confusional state, evaluate non-statin causes II b C
SAFETY RECOMMENDATION OF
STATINS
NIACIN RECOMMENDATIONS
Baseline liver enzymes,
FBS/HBA1c/uric acid
AST/ALT >2-3ULN
Persistent severe cutaneous
symptoms,hyperglycemia,
acute gout
New onset AF,
weight loss
Start at low dose
Take niacin with food or
aspirin 325mg ½ hr BF
Uptitrate 500 mg ER to
2000mgER over 4-8 weeks (or)
Plain niacin 100mg TID to
3g/day
BILE ACID
SEQUESTRANTS
Baseline fasting TG
>300 mg/dl
caution if TG 250-299
mg/dl. 4-6 weeks later if TG
>400 -discontinue
STEROL ABSORPTION
INHIBITORS
Baseline hepatic
transaminases
Discontinue if ALT>3 times
occur
FIBRATES OMEGA 3 FATTY
ACIDS
If used in TG >, evaluate
GI disturbances,
Evaluate GI disturbances
Gemfibrozil + statin therapy
(causes muscle symptoms)
If TG>500mg/dl and
benefit>risks -Fenofib
GFR<30 ml/min
PIPELINE DRUGS
BOCOCIZUMAB (Pfizer)
• PCSK9 inhibitor
• Phase 2b - Monthly or bimonthly injections ↓ LDL-
C at 12 weeks. *
• SPIRE trials (Phase 3) - plans to enrol 17,000 pts.
Intolerant to statins
Hereditary heterozygous hypercholesterolemia
Primary hyperlipidemia/mixed dyslipidemia (3 trials)
At highrisk CVD (2 trials)
* Ballantyne CM, Neutel J, Cropp A et al. Results of Bococizumab, A Monoclonal
Antibody Against Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9, from a
Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study in Statin-Treated Subjects
With Hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol. 2015 May 1;115(9):1212-21.
RG7652 (Roche)
• Monoclonal antibody – PCSK9 inhibitor
• July 2013: Phase II EQUATOR trial completed
(unpublished)
• July 2014:
Discontinued - Phase-I; Metabolic disorders
(Switzerland)
Discontinued - Phase-II; Coronary disorders &
Hyperlipidaemia (USA, Canada, Czech Republic,
Germany, Hungary, New Zealand, Norway, Slovakia and
South Africa)
LY3015014 (Eli Lilly)
• Monocloncal antibody – PCSK9 inhibitor
• 3 Phase 2 trials completed by June 2014
• No liver / muscle safety issues
• Upto 51% ↓ in LDL-C, significant ↓ non-HDL-C,
ApoB and Lp(a)*
* Kastelein J, Nissen S; Rader D et al. Safety and Efficacy of LY3015014, a New
Monoclonal Antibody to Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9)
with an Inherently Longer Duration of Action, in Patients with Primary
Hypercholesterolemia: A Randomized, PlaceboControlled, Dose-Ranging, Phase 2
Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(10_S)
1D05-IgG2
• Fragment antigen-binding (Fab) protein that mimics
EGFA domain of LDLR
• Current status: Preclinical studies
• Ts mouse model LDL-C ↓ 40% & ↑ hepatic LDLR
protein levels 5 fold.
• In healthy rhesus monkeys, LDL cholesterol ↓
20%–50% for over 2 weeks
*Ni YG, Di Marco S, Condra JH et al. A PCSK9-binding antibody that structurally
mimics the EGF(A) domain of LDL-receptor reduces LDL cholesterol in vivo. J
Lipid Res. 2011 Jan;52(1):78-86
ALN-PCS02 (Alnylam Pharma)
• siRNA against PCSK9 gene
• Phase 1 trail completed
• IV infusion for 32 patients
• Results officially not published
• However, significant impact on lipid management
PCSK9 VACCINE
• Virus like particle (VLP) – immunogenic carrier of PCSK9
antigenic peptide
• VLP – virus without DNA – no replication. External
structure – antigen display
• Animal studies showed high titre IgG antibodies
• Significant ↓ total cholesterol, TG & PL
* Crossey E, Amar MJ, Sampson M, Peabody J, Schiller JT, Chackerian B,
Remaley AT (2015). "A cholesterol-lowering VLP vaccine that targets
PCSK9". Vaccine 33(43): 5747–55
EVACETRAPIB – CETP inhibitor
• ACCELERATE trial – 12095 high risk CVD patients;
stopped prematurely (Oct 2015) for lack of efficacy
• ACCENTUATE trial – pts with hyperlipidemia or DM
ANACETRAPIB – CETP INHIBITOR
• DEFINE – Phase III trial*
1623 pt with CHD or at high risk on statins
100mg anacetrapib vs placebo
↑ HDL 138.1%, ↓LDL-C 36%, ↓Lp(a) 36.4% in
comparison with placebo by 24 weeks
No change in BP, Electrolyte or aldosterone by 76w
No ↑ in CVD events
• REVEAL – Phase III trial (ongoing) 30,000 pts with
occlusive arterial disease
* Cannon P, Shah S, Dansky HM et al. Safety of Anacetrapib in Patients with or at
High Risk for Coronary Heart Disease. NEJM 2010; 363:2406-2415
IMPLITAPIDE – MTTP INHIBITOR
• Two phase 2 trial terminated (2005)
• 80mg/160 mg doses caused unacceptable rise in
liver enzymes & GI disturbances *
• Trials with lower doses suggested
• No further details obtainable
*Dam MV, Farmer M, Stein EA et al. Efficacy an d safety of implitapide (bayy 13-
9952), a microsomal triglyceridee transfer protein inhibitor,, in patients with
primary hypercholesterolemia-accessed on 1/11/15 from
http://dare.uva.nl/document/2/14716
OTHER MTTP INHIBITORS
DRUG
(status as
of year)
REMARKS
CP346086
(2003)
Phase 2: 47% ↓total cholesterol, 72% ↓LDL-C,
75% ↓ TG
AEGR733 ↓LDL-C by 51% from baseline at the highest
dose. ↑ Liver aminotransferase & hepatic fat
accumulation
JTT130 Animal study: 25% ↓ LDL-C & 30% ↓ TG & No
hepatic steatosis. Current status – phase 2 trials
SUMMARY
• Lipid handling in the body & pathophysiology of
dyslipidemia & atherosclerosis
• Current hypolipidemic drugs – statins, BAS, fibrates
niacin, sterol absorption inhibitors
• Newer agents – PCSK9 inhibitors, MTTP inhibitors,
apo B inhibitor, CETP inhibitor, thyromimetics
• ACC/AHA 2013 guidelines - LDL-C targets are not
absolute as in ATPIII
• Drugs in the making
REFERENCES
• Tonkin A, Byrnes A. Treatment of dyslipidemia. F1000Prime
Reports. 2014;6:17
• Robert SR. Lipid lowering with drugs other than statins and
fibrates (accessed on 15/09/2015)
http://www.uptodate.com/contents/lipid-lowering-with-
drugs-other-than-statins-and-fibrates
• Robert SR. Lipid lowering with fibric acid derivatives.
(accessed on 15/09/2015)
http://www.uptodate.com/content/lipid-lowering-with-
fibric-acid-derivatives
• 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood
Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk
in Adults A Report of the American College of
Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on
Practice Guidelines. (accessed on 22/10/2015)
• Sahebkar A, Watts GF. New LDL-Cholesterol
Lowering Therapies: Pharmacology, Clinical Trials,
and Relevance to Acute Coronary Syndromes. Clin
Ther. 2013 Aug;35(8):1082-98
• For pipeline drugs status
(http://adisinsight.springer.com/drugs )
• For various trial details (https://clinicaltrials.gov)

More Related Content

What's hot

Crestor Presentation
Crestor PresentationCrestor Presentation
Crestor Presentationhospital
 
SGLT2I The paradigm change in diabetes management
SGLT2I The paradigm change in diabetes managementSGLT2I The paradigm change in diabetes management
SGLT2I The paradigm change in diabetes managementPraveen Nagula
 
Hypertension with comorbidity
Hypertension with comorbidityHypertension with comorbidity
Hypertension with comorbidityAadil Sayyed
 
What’s new in Lipidology, Lessons from “recent guidelines“
What’s new in Lipidology, Lessons from “recent guidelines“What’s new in Lipidology, Lessons from “recent guidelines“
What’s new in Lipidology, Lessons from “recent guidelines“Arindam Pande
 
SGLT2 inhibitors in Heart failure: A prized addition to HF treatment options
SGLT2 inhibitors in Heart failure: A prized addition to HF treatment optionsSGLT2 inhibitors in Heart failure: A prized addition to HF treatment options
SGLT2 inhibitors in Heart failure: A prized addition to HF treatment optionsahvc0858
 
Dyslipidemia guidelines
Dyslipidemia guidelinesDyslipidemia guidelines
Dyslipidemia guidelinesAinshamsCardio
 
Sglt 2 inhibiors in cardiovascular diseases
Sglt 2 inhibiors in cardiovascular diseasesSglt 2 inhibiors in cardiovascular diseases
Sglt 2 inhibiors in cardiovascular diseasesYogesh Shilimkar
 
PCKS9 INHIBITORS
PCKS9 INHIBITORSPCKS9 INHIBITORS
PCKS9 INHIBITORSShivani Rao
 
Combination Therapy In Hypertension - Dr Vivek Baliga Presentation
Combination Therapy In Hypertension - Dr Vivek Baliga PresentationCombination Therapy In Hypertension - Dr Vivek Baliga Presentation
Combination Therapy In Hypertension - Dr Vivek Baliga PresentationDr Vivek Baliga
 
DYSLIPIDEMIA GUIDELINES
DYSLIPIDEMIA GUIDELINESDYSLIPIDEMIA GUIDELINES
DYSLIPIDEMIA GUIDELINESarnab ghosh
 

What's hot (20)

Crestor Presentation
Crestor PresentationCrestor Presentation
Crestor Presentation
 
SGLT2I The paradigm change in diabetes management
SGLT2I The paradigm change in diabetes managementSGLT2I The paradigm change in diabetes management
SGLT2I The paradigm change in diabetes management
 
Hypertension with comorbidity
Hypertension with comorbidityHypertension with comorbidity
Hypertension with comorbidity
 
What’s new in Lipidology, Lessons from “recent guidelines“
What’s new in Lipidology, Lessons from “recent guidelines“What’s new in Lipidology, Lessons from “recent guidelines“
What’s new in Lipidology, Lessons from “recent guidelines“
 
SGLT 2 inhibitors
SGLT 2 inhibitorsSGLT 2 inhibitors
SGLT 2 inhibitors
 
Dapagliflozin
DapagliflozinDapagliflozin
Dapagliflozin
 
SGLT2 inhibitors in Heart failure: A prized addition to HF treatment options
SGLT2 inhibitors in Heart failure: A prized addition to HF treatment optionsSGLT2 inhibitors in Heart failure: A prized addition to HF treatment options
SGLT2 inhibitors in Heart failure: A prized addition to HF treatment options
 
Dyslipidemia guidelines
Dyslipidemia guidelinesDyslipidemia guidelines
Dyslipidemia guidelines
 
Pcsk 9 inhibitors
Pcsk 9 inhibitorsPcsk 9 inhibitors
Pcsk 9 inhibitors
 
Dpp – 4 inhibitors
Dpp – 4 inhibitorsDpp – 4 inhibitors
Dpp – 4 inhibitors
 
Sglt 2 inhibiors in cardiovascular diseases
Sglt 2 inhibiors in cardiovascular diseasesSglt 2 inhibiors in cardiovascular diseases
Sglt 2 inhibiors in cardiovascular diseases
 
Role of SGLT2i in cardio-renal protection
Role of SGLT2i in cardio-renal protectionRole of SGLT2i in cardio-renal protection
Role of SGLT2i in cardio-renal protection
 
PCKS9 INHIBITORS
PCKS9 INHIBITORSPCKS9 INHIBITORS
PCKS9 INHIBITORS
 
Statin intolerant patients
Statin intolerant patientsStatin intolerant patients
Statin intolerant patients
 
Combination Therapy In Hypertension - Dr Vivek Baliga Presentation
Combination Therapy In Hypertension - Dr Vivek Baliga PresentationCombination Therapy In Hypertension - Dr Vivek Baliga Presentation
Combination Therapy In Hypertension - Dr Vivek Baliga Presentation
 
Dyslipdemia Guidelines Head to Head
Dyslipdemia Guidelines Head to HeadDyslipdemia Guidelines Head to Head
Dyslipdemia Guidelines Head to Head
 
Rosuvastatin
RosuvastatinRosuvastatin
Rosuvastatin
 
Dapagliflozin
Dapagliflozin Dapagliflozin
Dapagliflozin
 
DPP4 Inhibitors P4 Seminar2
DPP4 Inhibitors P4 Seminar2DPP4 Inhibitors P4 Seminar2
DPP4 Inhibitors P4 Seminar2
 
DYSLIPIDEMIA GUIDELINES
DYSLIPIDEMIA GUIDELINESDYSLIPIDEMIA GUIDELINES
DYSLIPIDEMIA GUIDELINES
 

Similar to Current status & recent advances in dyslipidemia management

Similar to Current status & recent advances in dyslipidemia management (20)

Hypolipidemic drugs Dr. Kiran Piparva.pptx
Hypolipidemic drugs Dr. Kiran Piparva.pptxHypolipidemic drugs Dr. Kiran Piparva.pptx
Hypolipidemic drugs Dr. Kiran Piparva.pptx
 
Antihiperlipidemia varga 2021
Antihiperlipidemia varga 2021Antihiperlipidemia varga 2021
Antihiperlipidemia varga 2021
 
Hypolipidaemic Drugs
Hypolipidaemic DrugsHypolipidaemic Drugs
Hypolipidaemic Drugs
 
SAROGLITAZAR (LIPAGLYN)
SAROGLITAZAR (LIPAGLYN)SAROGLITAZAR (LIPAGLYN)
SAROGLITAZAR (LIPAGLYN)
 
Dyslipidemia 2016
Dyslipidemia 2016Dyslipidemia 2016
Dyslipidemia 2016
 
Statins
StatinsStatins
Statins
 
Dyslipidemia approach
Dyslipidemia approachDyslipidemia approach
Dyslipidemia approach
 
Management of Hyperlipidemia
Management of HyperlipidemiaManagement of Hyperlipidemia
Management of Hyperlipidemia
 
Dyslipdiemia for scribd.pptx
Dyslipdiemia for scribd.pptxDyslipdiemia for scribd.pptx
Dyslipdiemia for scribd.pptx
 
Pharmacotherapy of dyslipidemia
Pharmacotherapy of dyslipidemiaPharmacotherapy of dyslipidemia
Pharmacotherapy of dyslipidemia
 
DM Holistic Fam Med 2019
DM Holistic Fam Med 2019DM Holistic Fam Med 2019
DM Holistic Fam Med 2019
 
Hypolipidemic drugs
Hypolipidemic drugsHypolipidemic drugs
Hypolipidemic drugs
 
Dkd new look
Dkd new lookDkd new look
Dkd new look
 
Hypolipidaemic vinay
Hypolipidaemic vinayHypolipidaemic vinay
Hypolipidaemic vinay
 
Lipid modifying drug dr. tariqul
Lipid modifying drug  dr. tariqulLipid modifying drug  dr. tariqul
Lipid modifying drug dr. tariqul
 
Diabetic Dyslipidemia- Dr Shahjada Selim
Diabetic Dyslipidemia- Dr Shahjada SelimDiabetic Dyslipidemia- Dr Shahjada Selim
Diabetic Dyslipidemia- Dr Shahjada Selim
 
Dyslipidaemia presentation
Dyslipidaemia presentationDyslipidaemia presentation
Dyslipidaemia presentation
 
dyslipidemia6.ppt
dyslipidemia6.pptdyslipidemia6.ppt
dyslipidemia6.ppt
 
Dyslipidimia finale
Dyslipidimia finaleDyslipidimia finale
Dyslipidimia finale
 
Hyperlipidemia
HyperlipidemiaHyperlipidemia
Hyperlipidemia
 

Recently uploaded

All Time Service Available Call Girls Marine Drive 📳 9820252231 For 18+ VIP C...
All Time Service Available Call Girls Marine Drive 📳 9820252231 For 18+ VIP C...All Time Service Available Call Girls Marine Drive 📳 9820252231 For 18+ VIP C...
All Time Service Available Call Girls Marine Drive 📳 9820252231 For 18+ VIP C...Arohi Goyal
 
Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...
Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...
Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...hotbabesbook
 
Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Mg Road ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Sex...
Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Mg Road ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Sex...Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Mg Road ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Sex...
Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Mg Road ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Sex...narwatsonia7
 
(👑VVIP ISHAAN ) Russian Call Girls Service Navi Mumbai🖕9920874524🖕Independent...
(👑VVIP ISHAAN ) Russian Call Girls Service Navi Mumbai🖕9920874524🖕Independent...(👑VVIP ISHAAN ) Russian Call Girls Service Navi Mumbai🖕9920874524🖕Independent...
(👑VVIP ISHAAN ) Russian Call Girls Service Navi Mumbai🖕9920874524🖕Independent...Taniya Sharma
 
VIP Mumbai Call Girls Hiranandani Gardens Just Call 9920874524 with A/C Room ...
VIP Mumbai Call Girls Hiranandani Gardens Just Call 9920874524 with A/C Room ...VIP Mumbai Call Girls Hiranandani Gardens Just Call 9920874524 with A/C Room ...
VIP Mumbai Call Girls Hiranandani Gardens Just Call 9920874524 with A/C Room ...Garima Khatri
 
VIP Service Call Girls Sindhi Colony 📳 7877925207 For 18+ VIP Call Girl At Th...
VIP Service Call Girls Sindhi Colony 📳 7877925207 For 18+ VIP Call Girl At Th...VIP Service Call Girls Sindhi Colony 📳 7877925207 For 18+ VIP Call Girl At Th...
VIP Service Call Girls Sindhi Colony 📳 7877925207 For 18+ VIP Call Girl At Th...jageshsingh5554
 
♛VVIP Hyderabad Call Girls Chintalkunta🖕7001035870🖕Riya Kappor Top Call Girl ...
♛VVIP Hyderabad Call Girls Chintalkunta🖕7001035870🖕Riya Kappor Top Call Girl ...♛VVIP Hyderabad Call Girls Chintalkunta🖕7001035870🖕Riya Kappor Top Call Girl ...
♛VVIP Hyderabad Call Girls Chintalkunta🖕7001035870🖕Riya Kappor Top Call Girl ...astropune
 
The Most Attractive Hyderabad Call Girls Kothapet 𖠋 6297143586 𖠋 Will You Mis...
The Most Attractive Hyderabad Call Girls Kothapet 𖠋 6297143586 𖠋 Will You Mis...The Most Attractive Hyderabad Call Girls Kothapet 𖠋 6297143586 𖠋 Will You Mis...
The Most Attractive Hyderabad Call Girls Kothapet 𖠋 6297143586 𖠋 Will You Mis...chandars293
 
Premium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort Service
Premium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort ServicePremium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort Service
Premium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort Servicevidya singh
 
Lucknow Call girls - 8800925952 - 24x7 service with hotel room
Lucknow Call girls - 8800925952 - 24x7 service with hotel roomLucknow Call girls - 8800925952 - 24x7 service with hotel room
Lucknow Call girls - 8800925952 - 24x7 service with hotel roomdiscovermytutordmt
 
Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Richmond Circle ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Gen...
Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Richmond Circle ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Gen...Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Richmond Circle ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Gen...
Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Richmond Circle ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Gen...narwatsonia7
 
Call Girls Faridabad Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Faridabad Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Faridabad Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Faridabad Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableDipal Arora
 
Bangalore Call Girl Whatsapp Number 100% Complete Your Sexual Needs
Bangalore Call Girl Whatsapp Number 100% Complete Your Sexual NeedsBangalore Call Girl Whatsapp Number 100% Complete Your Sexual Needs
Bangalore Call Girl Whatsapp Number 100% Complete Your Sexual NeedsGfnyt
 
Call Girls Siliguri Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Siliguri Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Siliguri Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Siliguri Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableDipal Arora
 
Chandrapur Call girls 8617370543 Provides all area service COD available
Chandrapur Call girls 8617370543 Provides all area service COD availableChandrapur Call girls 8617370543 Provides all area service COD available
Chandrapur Call girls 8617370543 Provides all area service COD availableDipal Arora
 
VIP Call Girls Indore Kirti 💚😋 9256729539 🚀 Indore Escorts
VIP Call Girls Indore Kirti 💚😋  9256729539 🚀 Indore EscortsVIP Call Girls Indore Kirti 💚😋  9256729539 🚀 Indore Escorts
VIP Call Girls Indore Kirti 💚😋 9256729539 🚀 Indore Escortsaditipandeya
 
Call Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableDipal Arora
 
Call Girls Bangalore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Bangalore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Bangalore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Bangalore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableDipal Arora
 
Best Rate (Guwahati ) Call Girls Guwahati ⟟ 8617370543 ⟟ High Class Call Girl...
Best Rate (Guwahati ) Call Girls Guwahati ⟟ 8617370543 ⟟ High Class Call Girl...Best Rate (Guwahati ) Call Girls Guwahati ⟟ 8617370543 ⟟ High Class Call Girl...
Best Rate (Guwahati ) Call Girls Guwahati ⟟ 8617370543 ⟟ High Class Call Girl...Dipal Arora
 
Call Girls Bareilly Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Bareilly Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Bareilly Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Bareilly Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableDipal Arora
 

Recently uploaded (20)

All Time Service Available Call Girls Marine Drive 📳 9820252231 For 18+ VIP C...
All Time Service Available Call Girls Marine Drive 📳 9820252231 For 18+ VIP C...All Time Service Available Call Girls Marine Drive 📳 9820252231 For 18+ VIP C...
All Time Service Available Call Girls Marine Drive 📳 9820252231 For 18+ VIP C...
 
Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...
Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...
Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...
 
Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Mg Road ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Sex...
Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Mg Road ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Sex...Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Mg Road ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Sex...
Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Mg Road ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Sex...
 
(👑VVIP ISHAAN ) Russian Call Girls Service Navi Mumbai🖕9920874524🖕Independent...
(👑VVIP ISHAAN ) Russian Call Girls Service Navi Mumbai🖕9920874524🖕Independent...(👑VVIP ISHAAN ) Russian Call Girls Service Navi Mumbai🖕9920874524🖕Independent...
(👑VVIP ISHAAN ) Russian Call Girls Service Navi Mumbai🖕9920874524🖕Independent...
 
VIP Mumbai Call Girls Hiranandani Gardens Just Call 9920874524 with A/C Room ...
VIP Mumbai Call Girls Hiranandani Gardens Just Call 9920874524 with A/C Room ...VIP Mumbai Call Girls Hiranandani Gardens Just Call 9920874524 with A/C Room ...
VIP Mumbai Call Girls Hiranandani Gardens Just Call 9920874524 with A/C Room ...
 
VIP Service Call Girls Sindhi Colony 📳 7877925207 For 18+ VIP Call Girl At Th...
VIP Service Call Girls Sindhi Colony 📳 7877925207 For 18+ VIP Call Girl At Th...VIP Service Call Girls Sindhi Colony 📳 7877925207 For 18+ VIP Call Girl At Th...
VIP Service Call Girls Sindhi Colony 📳 7877925207 For 18+ VIP Call Girl At Th...
 
♛VVIP Hyderabad Call Girls Chintalkunta🖕7001035870🖕Riya Kappor Top Call Girl ...
♛VVIP Hyderabad Call Girls Chintalkunta🖕7001035870🖕Riya Kappor Top Call Girl ...♛VVIP Hyderabad Call Girls Chintalkunta🖕7001035870🖕Riya Kappor Top Call Girl ...
♛VVIP Hyderabad Call Girls Chintalkunta🖕7001035870🖕Riya Kappor Top Call Girl ...
 
The Most Attractive Hyderabad Call Girls Kothapet 𖠋 6297143586 𖠋 Will You Mis...
The Most Attractive Hyderabad Call Girls Kothapet 𖠋 6297143586 𖠋 Will You Mis...The Most Attractive Hyderabad Call Girls Kothapet 𖠋 6297143586 𖠋 Will You Mis...
The Most Attractive Hyderabad Call Girls Kothapet 𖠋 6297143586 𖠋 Will You Mis...
 
Premium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort Service
Premium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort ServicePremium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort Service
Premium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort Service
 
Lucknow Call girls - 8800925952 - 24x7 service with hotel room
Lucknow Call girls - 8800925952 - 24x7 service with hotel roomLucknow Call girls - 8800925952 - 24x7 service with hotel room
Lucknow Call girls - 8800925952 - 24x7 service with hotel room
 
Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Richmond Circle ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Gen...
Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Richmond Circle ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Gen...Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Richmond Circle ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Gen...
Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Richmond Circle ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Gen...
 
Call Girls Faridabad Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Faridabad Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Faridabad Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Faridabad Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Bangalore Call Girl Whatsapp Number 100% Complete Your Sexual Needs
Bangalore Call Girl Whatsapp Number 100% Complete Your Sexual NeedsBangalore Call Girl Whatsapp Number 100% Complete Your Sexual Needs
Bangalore Call Girl Whatsapp Number 100% Complete Your Sexual Needs
 
Call Girls Siliguri Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Siliguri Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Siliguri Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Siliguri Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Chandrapur Call girls 8617370543 Provides all area service COD available
Chandrapur Call girls 8617370543 Provides all area service COD availableChandrapur Call girls 8617370543 Provides all area service COD available
Chandrapur Call girls 8617370543 Provides all area service COD available
 
VIP Call Girls Indore Kirti 💚😋 9256729539 🚀 Indore Escorts
VIP Call Girls Indore Kirti 💚😋  9256729539 🚀 Indore EscortsVIP Call Girls Indore Kirti 💚😋  9256729539 🚀 Indore Escorts
VIP Call Girls Indore Kirti 💚😋 9256729539 🚀 Indore Escorts
 
Call Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Call Girls Bangalore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Bangalore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Bangalore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Bangalore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Best Rate (Guwahati ) Call Girls Guwahati ⟟ 8617370543 ⟟ High Class Call Girl...
Best Rate (Guwahati ) Call Girls Guwahati ⟟ 8617370543 ⟟ High Class Call Girl...Best Rate (Guwahati ) Call Girls Guwahati ⟟ 8617370543 ⟟ High Class Call Girl...
Best Rate (Guwahati ) Call Girls Guwahati ⟟ 8617370543 ⟟ High Class Call Girl...
 
Call Girls Bareilly Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Bareilly Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Bareilly Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Bareilly Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 

Current status & recent advances in dyslipidemia management

  • 1. CURRENT STATUS & RECENT ADVANCES IN DYSLIPIDEMIA TREATMENT Dr. Jeffrey Pradeep Raj Post-graduate Dept. of Pharmacology – SJMC 02-11-2015
  • 2. OUTLINE • Introduction • Lipid handling in the body • Pathophysiology of atherosclerosis • Current Hypolipidaemic drugs • Newer Hypolipidaemic drugs • ACC/AHA Clinical guidelines 2013 • Pipeline drugs • Summary
  • 4. DYSLIPIDEMIA • Disorder of Lipid & lipoprotein metabolism • 3 primary abnormalities Elevated triglycerides Elevated LDL cholesterol Reduced HDL cholesterol • Most important modifiable risk factor for CAD • Causes – Primary / secondary
  • 5. PRIMARY DYSLIPIDEMIA TYPE LIPID LIPOPROTEIN OCCURRENCE I – Familial lipoprotein lipase deficiency TG Chylomicrons Rare IIa – Familial Hypercholesterolaemia C LDL Common IIb – Polygenic hypercholestrolaemia C, TG LDL, VLDL Most common III – Familial dysbetalipoproteinaemia C,TG IDL Rare IV – Hypertriglyceridemia TG VLDL Common V – Familial combined hyperlipidaemia TG VLDL, chylomicrons Rare
  • 6. SECONDARY DYSLIPIDEMIA LDL cholesterol Triglycerides HDL cholesterol Diabetes mellitus Hypothyroidism Nephrotic syndrome Obstructive liver disease Drugs Anabolic steroids Progestins Beta blockers Thiazides Alcoholism Diabetes mellitus Hypothyroidism Obesity Renal insufficiency Drugs Beta blockers Bile acid resins Estrogens Ticlopidine Cigarette smoking Diabetes mellitus Hypertriglyceridemia Menopause Obesity Puberty (in males) Uraemia Drugs Anabolic steroids Beta blockers
  • 7. LIPID HANDLING IN THE BODY
  • 8. LIPID ABSORPTION • Bile emulsifies fat in chyme • P. lipase coverts Triacyl glyceryl into FFA + glycerol • Absorbed into enterocyte rapidly
  • 10. LIPOPROTEINS • 5 classes classified based on the density • TG transported in chylomicrons or VLDLs • Cholesterol transported as cholesteryl esters in LDLs and HDLs
  • 15. CLASSIFICATION – CURRENT DRUGS • HMG – CoA reductase inhibitors Lovastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, pitavastatin • Bile acid sequestrants (resins) Cholestyramine, colestipol • Lipoprotein lipase activators (PPAR alpha activators) Clofibrate, gemfibrozil, bezafibrate, fenofibrate • Lipolysis and triglyceride synthesis inhibitor Nicotinic acid • Sterol absorption inhibitor Ezetimibe
  • 16. OVERVIEW OF CURRENT DRUGS (1/2) DRUG CLASS MOA SIDE EFFECTS HMG CoA reductase inhibitors Lovastatin (10-80mg) Simvastatin (5-40mg) Atorvastatin (10-80mg) Rosuvastatin (5-20mg) ↓ CH synthesis by inhibition of rate limiting HMG-CoA reductase Myositis, myalgia, Elevated hepatic transaminases, Sleep disturbance, Head ache, nausea Bile acid sequestrants Cholestyramine (4-16g) Colestipol (5-30g) ↓ bile acid absorption, ↑ hepatic conversion of CH to bile acids, ↑ LDL receptors on hepatocytes Unpalatability, bloating, constipation, heart burn
  • 17. OVERVIEW OF CURRENT DRUGS (2/2) DRUG CLASS MOA SIDE EFFECTS PPAR alpha activators Gemfibrozil (1200mg) Bezafibrate (600mg) Fenofibrate (200mg) ↑ Activity of lipoprotein lipase, ↑ VLDL metabolism, ↑ oxidation of FA in muscle & adipose tissue, ↓ TG synthesis in liver Nausea, skin rash, 1-2% ↑ incidence of gall stones Nicotinic acid (2-6g) ↓ Production of VLDL, ↓ lipolysis in adipocytes Flushing, nausea, gluc intolerance, abnormal LFT, hyperuricemia
  • 18. STATINS (1/3) Pleotropic effects: Non- lipid lowering, cardioprotective
  • 19. STATINS (2/3) • Metabolized by microsomal enzymes except pravastatin • CI: pregnancy, lactation • Potency : rosuvastatin > atorvastatin > simvastatin > pravastatin & lovastatin • Lovastatin: First clinically used statin, prodrug Extensive first pass metab; excreted in bile • Simvastatin: Greater rise in HDL, prodrug Extensive first pass metab; Better oral absorption
  • 20. STATINS (3/3) • Pravastatin: CH lowering effect is less; ↓ plaque Decrease in fibrinogen level • Atorvastatin: Long acting (t ½ = 18-24 hr) Highest LDL-C lowering Antioxidant & antiinflammatory • Rosuvastatin: Most potent Greater LDL-C reduction • Pitavastatin: Latest; no specific advantage
  • 21. ASCOT-LLA TRIAL Sever PS, Dahlöf B, Poulter NR, et al. prevention of coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower than average cholesterol concentrations in the Anglo-Scandinavian cardiac outcomes trial – lipid Lowering arm (LLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. LANCET 2003; 361:1149 Participants 10305 hypertensive patients (aged 40-79 years; at least 3 CV risk factors) in ASCOT trial with non-fasting total cholesterol concentrations 6.5 mmol/L or less Intervention Atorvastatin 10mg vs placebo End point non-fatal myocardial infarction and fatal CHD Conclusions 100 events vs 154 in placebo (HR 0.64, p=0.0005). Strokes, total CV events & coronary events were significantly lowered in statin arm
  • 22. JUPITER TRIAL Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(21):2195 Participants 17,802 healthy pts with LDL-C < 130 mg/dl but hs-CRP of 2.0 mg/l or higher Intervention rosuvastatin, 20 mg daily, or placebo End point Composite end point of MI, stroke, arterial revascularization, hospitalization for unstable angina, or death from cardiovascular causes Conclusions ↓ incidence of major CVS events. ↓ LDL-C 50% & ↓hs-CRP 37%
  • 23. 4S TRIAL Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study. Lancet 1994; 344 (8934): 1383 Participants 4444 patients with angina pectoris or previous MI & serum cholesterol 5.5-8.0 mmol/L on a lipid-lowering diet Intervention Simvastatin or placebo End point Lipid profile improvement and CVD outcomes Conclusions mean changes in TC, LDL-C, HDL-C of -25%, -35%, and +8%, resp. 37% reduction (p<0.00001) in the risk of undergoing myocardial revascularisation procedures. Improved survival in CHD patients
  • 24. PROVE-IT Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH et al. Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes N Engl J Med. 2004;350(15):1495 Participants 4162 patients hospitalized for ACS within the preceding 10 days Intervention 40 mg pravastatin OD (std therapy) vs 80 mg atorvastatin OD (intensive therapy) End point Composite of death from any cause, MI, documented unstable angina requiring rehospitalization, revascularization (at least 30 days after randomization), & stroke Conclusions 16% reduction in the hazard ratio in atorvastatin. Intensive lipid-lowering statin regimen greater survival
  • 25. BILE ACID SEQUESTRANTS • Secondary effect on cholesterol synthesis actually  VLDL • Hyper- TG may limit use • Used in combination with a statin • Important interactions – bind polar drugs such as warfarin, digoxin, thyroxine and statins • Colesevelam (625mg 3 tab BD) – newer drug; better tolerated
  • 26. FIBRATES (1/2) • Most effective at reducing VLDL (TG); smaller  in LDL-C ; useful  in HDL-C • Less favourable effect on clinical outcomes • Improvements in microvascular outcomes • Important interactions Increased risk of myositis on a statin reduction in dose requirements (~30%) for patients on warfarin
  • 27. FIBRATES (2/2) • Fenofibrate: prodrug – t ½ 20 hr Reduce fibrinogen levels Commonly used in combination with statins (minimally affects statin metab & ↓ myopathy) • Gemfibrozil: Reduces TG & CH Increased risk of myopathy with statin • Bezafibrate: No myopathy
  • 28. FIELD TRIAL Keech A, Simes RJ, Barter P et al. Effects of long-term fenofibrate therapy on cardiovascular events in 9795 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the FIELD study): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005, 366:1849-61 Participants 9795 pts (2131 with previous CVD & 7664 without) aged 50-75 years, with type 2 diabetes mellitus not taking statin therapy Intervention Micronised fenofibrate 200 mg OD vs Placebo End point Coronary events (CHD death or non-fatal MI). For subgroup analysis - Total cardiovascular events (CVD death, MI, stroke, coronary & carotid revascularisation) Conclusions Significant reduction in TGs. Reduction in total CV events. No significant reduction in coronary events
  • 29. ACCORD TRIAL Ginsberg HN, Elam MB, Lovato LC et al. Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2010, 362:1563-74 Participants 5518 pts - type 2 diabetes on simvastatin treatment Intervention Fenofibrate vs placebo. End point First occurrence of nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, or death from CV causes. Conclusions Combination therapy did not reduce the rate of fatal CV events, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke. 30% ↓ in TG. ↓ progression in Retinopathy
  • 30. NICOTINIC ACID •  VLDL & fibrinogen; ↑ HDL 30-35%;  TGs ~ 40% • Usually employed in combination with fibrate, resin or statin – this avoids side effects of higher doses
  • 31. AIM – HIGH TRIAL Boden WE, Probstfield JL, Anderson T et al. Niacin in patients with low HDL cholesterol levels receiving intensive statin therapy. N Engl J Med 2011; 365:2255-2267 Participants 3414 established CVD, low HDL-C, high TG Intervention ER niacin 1.5 – 2.0g vs placebo. All patients received simvastatin 40-80mg/d ± ezetimibe 10mg/d End point 1st event of the composite of death from CHD, nonfatal MI, ischemic stroke, hospitalization for ACS or symptom-driven coronary or cerebral revascularization conclusions Among ASCVD pts with LDL <70mg/dl – no benefit despite Improvements in HDL-C and TG
  • 32. HPS-2 THRIVE TRIAL Landray MJ, Haynes R, Hopewell JC et al. Effects of extended-release niacin with laropiprant in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:203-212 Participants 25,673 adults with vascular disease. Prerandomization run-in phase to standardize the background statin-based LDL-C lowering therapy Intervention ER Niacin 2g + 40mg Laropiprant vs placebo End point First major vascular event (nonfatal MI, death from coronary causes, stroke, or arterial revascularization) Conclusions In ASCVD, no significant reduction in major vascular events but increased serious ADE
  • 33. EZETIMIBE-STEROL ABSORPTION INHIBITOR • Inhibits CH absorption from intestine • Novel inhibitor of intestinal cholesterol transporter (NPC1C1) • No important adverse effects or significant drug interactions • Statins decrease liver CH synthesis but increase intestinal absorption. Ezetimibe vice versa (synergistic) • Unlike resins, it causes fall in TG
  • 34. IMPROVE – IT TRIAL Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP et al. Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(25):2387 Participants 18,144 pts hospitalized for ACS in last 10 days LDL-C 50-100mg/dl if receiving lipid-lowering therapy or 50-125mg/dl if not receiving Intervention Simvastatin 40 mg + ezetimibe 10 mg vs simvastatin 40 mg + placebo End point Composite of CVD, nonfatal MI, unstable angina requiring rehospitalization, coronary revascularization, or nonfatal stroke Conclusions Lowering of LDL-C and improved CV outcomes
  • 36. CLASSIFICATION - NEWER DRUGS • Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors – Evolocumab, bococizumab, Alirocumab • Apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibitor – Mipomersen • Microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTTP) inhibitor – Lopitamide • Thyromimetic – Eprotirome • Cholestryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors – Torcetrapib, dalcetrapib
  • 37. PCSK9 INHIBITORS • Inhibit proprotein convertase subtilisn/kexin type 9 • Increases LDLR density on hepatocytes • Prevents LDLR degradation
  • 40. APPROACHES TO PCSK 9 INHIBITION • Monoclonal antibodies: RG-7652 and LY3015014 • Peptide mimics - Peptides that mimic the EGFA domain of the LDLR that binds to PCSK9 (1D05- IgG2 ) • Gene silencing: PCSK9 antisense oligonucleotide, increases expression of the LDLR Locked nucleic acid – reduced PCSK9 mRNA RNA interference (ALN PCS02) • Naturally occurring inhibitors: Plant alkaloid berberine & endogenous Annexin A2
  • 41. ALIROCUMAB – PRALUENT • First drug of PCSK9I to be approved (July24, 2015) • Second line treatment for adults next to diet & statin for clinical ASCVD & FH • Side effects - Nose & throat irritation Injection site reactions and bruising Flu-like symptoms Diarrhoea Bronchitis and cough Muscle pain, soreness, and spasms
  • 42. ODYSSEY TRIAL Robinson JG, Farnier M, Krempf M et al. Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab in Reducing Lipids and Cardiovascular Events Participants 2341 patients at high risk for CVD. LDL-C of 70 mg/dl or more + receiving rx with statins at the maximum tolerated dose, +/- other lipid-lowering therapy Intervention Patients randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive alirocumab (150 mg) or placebo as a 1-ml S/C every 2 weeks for 78 weeks End point Percentage change in calculated LDL cholesterol level from baseline to week 24 Conclusions At 24 weeks % change from baseline was 64% (p<0.001) Over 78 weeks significant ↓ LDL-C. In a post hoc analysis, evidence of ↓cardiovascular events
  • 43. EVOLOCUMAB - REPHATHA • PCSK9 inhibitor from Amgen • FDA approval – 27 Aug 2015 (RUTHERFORD 1, 2 & GAUSS trials) • Pts with uncontrolled LDL-C on current Rx options • Side effects: Nasopharyngitis / URTI / flu Back pain Injection site reactions • Ongoing trials GAUSS – 2,3 in Statin Intolerant & FOURIER
  • 44. APO B INHIBITOR – MIPOMERSEN (KYNAMRO) • Antisense oligonucleotide binds to mRNA; prevents translation to form apolipoprotein-B • Decreased formation of apoB-containing lipoproteins, including LDL cholesterol (40-50%). • Also decrease Lp(a) concentrations. • Side effects: Injection-site reactions in almost all Influenza-like illness in many, and hepatic steatosis with elevated liver enzymes in up to 15% of patients • Approved for homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, minimising apheresis need
  • 45. MTTP INHIBITOR – LOMITAPIDE (JUXPID) • Inhibit TG transfer to apoB-48 or apoB-100 in intestinal & liver cells respectively; decrease formation of chylomicrons & VLDL. • VLDL inhibition leads to LDL inhibition. • Side effects: Increased stool frequency, hepatic steatosis & increase in serum transaminase levels. • FDA approval in Dec 2012 for homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.
  • 46. CETP INHIBITORS • Inhibit transfer of cholesterol from anti-atherogenic apolipoprotein A – containing particles to atherogenic apolipoprotein B particles DRUG NAME TRIAL REMARKS Torcetrapib (with statins, ↑ HDL 60%, ↓ LDL 25%) ILLUMINATE (Terminated - ADR ) ↑ all-cause mortality & cardiovascular events, ↑ Sys BP by 5-6 mm Hg, ↑ aldosterone & cortisol, ↑ endothelial NO synthase & endothelin I Dalcetrapib (↑ HDL 30%, LDL no effect) Dal-OUTCOMES (Terminated - futility) ↑ Sys BP , smaller but significant ↑ CRP (inflammation)
  • 47. THYROMIMETICS - EPRORITOME • Thyroid hormone analog with minimal non-hepatic tissue uptake • No long term or large studies done so far • No clinical hyper/hypo-thyroidism • Side effect: elevated transaminases
  • 48. MISCELLANEOUS DRUGS • Probucol – ↓ LDL-C and HDL-C; facilitate resorption of cutaneous & tendon xanthomas • Neomycin – ↓ LDL-C & Lp(a) 25%; similar in action to bile acid sequestrants • Oestrogen Replacement therapy in post- menopausal women - ↓ LDL-C ↑ HDL-C • Tamoxifen - ↓ LDL-C & tot. CH. No effect on HDL
  • 50. EVOLUTION OF NHBLI SUPPORT GUIDELINES Current guidelines ACC/AHA 2013
  • 51. NCEP ATP III vs ACC/AHA NCEP ATP III AHA/ACC – ATP IV Year 2001 (updated in 2004) 2013 Focus Reducing CHD risk Reducing risk of atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD) – includes CHD + TIA/stroke, PAD or revascularisation Risk assessment Framingham 10 yr risk score (CHD death + non fatal MI Pooled cohort equations* (fatal & nonfatal CHD + fatal & nonfatal stroke *Developed by the Risk Assessment Work Group to estimate the 10-year ASCVD risk (defined as first-occurrence nonfatal and fatal MI and nonfatal and fatal stroke) for the identification of candidates for statin therapy
  • 52. NCEP ATP III vs ACC/AHA NCEP ATP III AHA/ACC – ATP IV Risk Categories 3 main risk categories: CHD / CHD risk equivalent (DM, Clinical CHD, symptomatic CAD, PAD) 2+ risk factors & 10-yr risk ≤ 20% 0-1 risk factors & 10-yr risk <10% 4 statin benefit groups: Clinical ASCVD Primary LDL-C elevations ≥190 mg/dl DM without clinical ASCVD No DM/CVD with 10-yr ASCVD risk ≥7.5% Rx targets LDL-C primary target <100mg/dl <130mg/dl (<100 if risk 10-20%) <160mg/dl (in the order of categories mentioned above) Intensity of statin therapy High intensity statin therapy (LDL-C reduction ≥50%) recommended for most patients in 4 statin benefit groups Rx recommen dations Statin (or bile acid sequestrants or nicotinic acid) to achieve LDL-C goal Maximally tolerated statin first-line to reduce risk of ASCVD events
  • 54.
  • 58. HIGH INTENSITY THERAPY MODERATE INTENSITY THERAPY LOW INTENSITY THERAPY Daily dose lowers LDL-C on avg ~ ≥50% Daily dose lowers LDL –C on avg ~ 30-50% Daily dose lowers LDL –C <30% Atorvastatin (40*) 80 mg Atorvastatin 10 (20) mg Simvastatin 10 mg Rosuvastatin 20 (40) mg Rosuvastatin (5) 10 mg Pravastatin 10-20 mg Simvastatin 20-40 mg Lovastatin 20 mg Pravastatin 40 (80) mg Fluvastatin 20-40 mg Lovastatin 40 mg Pitavastatin 1 mg Fluvastatin XL 80 mg * Only one RCT Fluvastatin 40 mg bid Pitavastatin 2-4 mg STATIN THERAPY
  • 60. ACC/AHA COR LOE 1.Creatine Kinase, routinely not needed III (No benefit) A 2.Baseline CK in pts at risk of events IIa C 3.Baseline ALT before initiating statins I B 4.Decreasing the statin dose, if 2 consecutive values of LDL-C <40 mg/dl. IIb C 5.Simvastatin at 80 mg daily harmful III (Harm) A 6.New onset diabetes on statin therapy, continue statins & lifestyle management I B 7.If muscle symptoms develop, discontinue, use again II a C 8.Confusional state, evaluate non-statin causes II b C SAFETY RECOMMENDATION OF STATINS
  • 61. NIACIN RECOMMENDATIONS Baseline liver enzymes, FBS/HBA1c/uric acid AST/ALT >2-3ULN Persistent severe cutaneous symptoms,hyperglycemia, acute gout New onset AF, weight loss Start at low dose Take niacin with food or aspirin 325mg ½ hr BF Uptitrate 500 mg ER to 2000mgER over 4-8 weeks (or) Plain niacin 100mg TID to 3g/day
  • 62. BILE ACID SEQUESTRANTS Baseline fasting TG >300 mg/dl caution if TG 250-299 mg/dl. 4-6 weeks later if TG >400 -discontinue STEROL ABSORPTION INHIBITORS Baseline hepatic transaminases Discontinue if ALT>3 times occur
  • 63. FIBRATES OMEGA 3 FATTY ACIDS If used in TG >, evaluate GI disturbances, Evaluate GI disturbances Gemfibrozil + statin therapy (causes muscle symptoms) If TG>500mg/dl and benefit>risks -Fenofib GFR<30 ml/min
  • 65. BOCOCIZUMAB (Pfizer) • PCSK9 inhibitor • Phase 2b - Monthly or bimonthly injections ↓ LDL- C at 12 weeks. * • SPIRE trials (Phase 3) - plans to enrol 17,000 pts. Intolerant to statins Hereditary heterozygous hypercholesterolemia Primary hyperlipidemia/mixed dyslipidemia (3 trials) At highrisk CVD (2 trials) * Ballantyne CM, Neutel J, Cropp A et al. Results of Bococizumab, A Monoclonal Antibody Against Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9, from a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study in Statin-Treated Subjects With Hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol. 2015 May 1;115(9):1212-21.
  • 66. RG7652 (Roche) • Monoclonal antibody – PCSK9 inhibitor • July 2013: Phase II EQUATOR trial completed (unpublished) • July 2014: Discontinued - Phase-I; Metabolic disorders (Switzerland) Discontinued - Phase-II; Coronary disorders & Hyperlipidaemia (USA, Canada, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, New Zealand, Norway, Slovakia and South Africa)
  • 67. LY3015014 (Eli Lilly) • Monocloncal antibody – PCSK9 inhibitor • 3 Phase 2 trials completed by June 2014 • No liver / muscle safety issues • Upto 51% ↓ in LDL-C, significant ↓ non-HDL-C, ApoB and Lp(a)* * Kastelein J, Nissen S; Rader D et al. Safety and Efficacy of LY3015014, a New Monoclonal Antibody to Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) with an Inherently Longer Duration of Action, in Patients with Primary Hypercholesterolemia: A Randomized, PlaceboControlled, Dose-Ranging, Phase 2 Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(10_S)
  • 68. 1D05-IgG2 • Fragment antigen-binding (Fab) protein that mimics EGFA domain of LDLR • Current status: Preclinical studies • Ts mouse model LDL-C ↓ 40% & ↑ hepatic LDLR protein levels 5 fold. • In healthy rhesus monkeys, LDL cholesterol ↓ 20%–50% for over 2 weeks *Ni YG, Di Marco S, Condra JH et al. A PCSK9-binding antibody that structurally mimics the EGF(A) domain of LDL-receptor reduces LDL cholesterol in vivo. J Lipid Res. 2011 Jan;52(1):78-86
  • 69. ALN-PCS02 (Alnylam Pharma) • siRNA against PCSK9 gene • Phase 1 trail completed • IV infusion for 32 patients • Results officially not published • However, significant impact on lipid management
  • 70. PCSK9 VACCINE • Virus like particle (VLP) – immunogenic carrier of PCSK9 antigenic peptide • VLP – virus without DNA – no replication. External structure – antigen display • Animal studies showed high titre IgG antibodies • Significant ↓ total cholesterol, TG & PL * Crossey E, Amar MJ, Sampson M, Peabody J, Schiller JT, Chackerian B, Remaley AT (2015). "A cholesterol-lowering VLP vaccine that targets PCSK9". Vaccine 33(43): 5747–55
  • 71. EVACETRAPIB – CETP inhibitor • ACCELERATE trial – 12095 high risk CVD patients; stopped prematurely (Oct 2015) for lack of efficacy • ACCENTUATE trial – pts with hyperlipidemia or DM
  • 72. ANACETRAPIB – CETP INHIBITOR • DEFINE – Phase III trial* 1623 pt with CHD or at high risk on statins 100mg anacetrapib vs placebo ↑ HDL 138.1%, ↓LDL-C 36%, ↓Lp(a) 36.4% in comparison with placebo by 24 weeks No change in BP, Electrolyte or aldosterone by 76w No ↑ in CVD events • REVEAL – Phase III trial (ongoing) 30,000 pts with occlusive arterial disease * Cannon P, Shah S, Dansky HM et al. Safety of Anacetrapib in Patients with or at High Risk for Coronary Heart Disease. NEJM 2010; 363:2406-2415
  • 73. IMPLITAPIDE – MTTP INHIBITOR • Two phase 2 trial terminated (2005) • 80mg/160 mg doses caused unacceptable rise in liver enzymes & GI disturbances * • Trials with lower doses suggested • No further details obtainable *Dam MV, Farmer M, Stein EA et al. Efficacy an d safety of implitapide (bayy 13- 9952), a microsomal triglyceridee transfer protein inhibitor,, in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia-accessed on 1/11/15 from http://dare.uva.nl/document/2/14716
  • 74. OTHER MTTP INHIBITORS DRUG (status as of year) REMARKS CP346086 (2003) Phase 2: 47% ↓total cholesterol, 72% ↓LDL-C, 75% ↓ TG AEGR733 ↓LDL-C by 51% from baseline at the highest dose. ↑ Liver aminotransferase & hepatic fat accumulation JTT130 Animal study: 25% ↓ LDL-C & 30% ↓ TG & No hepatic steatosis. Current status – phase 2 trials
  • 75. SUMMARY • Lipid handling in the body & pathophysiology of dyslipidemia & atherosclerosis • Current hypolipidemic drugs – statins, BAS, fibrates niacin, sterol absorption inhibitors • Newer agents – PCSK9 inhibitors, MTTP inhibitors, apo B inhibitor, CETP inhibitor, thyromimetics • ACC/AHA 2013 guidelines - LDL-C targets are not absolute as in ATPIII • Drugs in the making
  • 76. REFERENCES • Tonkin A, Byrnes A. Treatment of dyslipidemia. F1000Prime Reports. 2014;6:17 • Robert SR. Lipid lowering with drugs other than statins and fibrates (accessed on 15/09/2015) http://www.uptodate.com/contents/lipid-lowering-with- drugs-other-than-statins-and-fibrates • Robert SR. Lipid lowering with fibric acid derivatives. (accessed on 15/09/2015) http://www.uptodate.com/content/lipid-lowering-with- fibric-acid-derivatives • 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. (accessed on 22/10/2015)
  • 77. • Sahebkar A, Watts GF. New LDL-Cholesterol Lowering Therapies: Pharmacology, Clinical Trials, and Relevance to Acute Coronary Syndromes. Clin Ther. 2013 Aug;35(8):1082-98 • For pipeline drugs status (http://adisinsight.springer.com/drugs ) • For various trial details (https://clinicaltrials.gov)

Editor's Notes

  1. 2-monoaclyglycerol & fatty acids assemble to from TG. Cholesterol is converted into cholesteryl ester. These are assembled with apolipoprotein B-48 into nascent chylomicrons. These particles are then secreted into the lacteals in a process that depends heavily on apolipoprotein B-48. As they circulate through the lymphatic vessels, nascent chylomicrons bypass the liver circulation and are drained via the thoracic duct into the bloodstream
  2. Exogenous pathway In the blood stream, nascent chylomicron particles interact with HDL particles resulting in HDL donatation of apolipoprotein C-II and apolipoprotein E to the nascent chylomicron. The chylomicron at this stage is then considered mature. Via apolipoprotein C-II, mature chylomicrons activatelipoprtoein lipase (LPL), an enzyme on endothelial cells lining the blood vessels. LPL catalyzes the hydrolysis of triacyl glycerol that ultimately releases glycerol and fatty acids from the chylomicrons. Glycerol and fatty acids can then be absorbed in peripheral tissues, especially adipose and muscle, for energy and storage. The hydrolyzed chylomicrons are now called chylomicron remnants. The chylomicron remnants continue circulating the bloodstream until they interact via apolipoprotein E with chylomicron remnant receptors, found chiefly in the liver. This interaction causes the endocytosis of the chylomicron remnants, which are subsequently hydrolyzed within lysosomes. Lysosomal hydrolysis releases glycerol and fatty acids into the cell, which can be used for energy or stored for later use. Endogenous pathway The liver is the central platform for the handling of lipids: it is able to store glycerols and fats in its cells, the hepatocytes. Hepatocytes are also able to create triacylglycerols via de novo synthesis. They also produce the bile from cholesterol. In the hepatocytes, triacylglycerols and chlesteryl esters are assembled with aapolipoprotein B 100 to form nascent VLDL particles. Nascent VLDL particles are released into the bloodstream via a process that depends upon apolipoprotein B-100. In the blood stream, nascent VLDL particles bump with HDL particles; as a result, HDL particles donate apolipoprotein C-II and apolipoprotein E  to the nascent VLDL particle; Once loaded with apolipoproteins C-II and E, the nascent VLDL particle is considered mature. Again, like chylomicrons, VLDL particles circulate and encounter LPL expressed on endothelial. Apolipoprotein C-II activates LPL, causing hydrolysis of the VLDL particle and the release of glycerol and fatty acids. These products can be absorbed from the blood by peripheral tissues, principally adipose and muscle. The hydrolyzed VLDL particles are now called VLDL remnants or IDLs. VLDL remnants can circulate and, via an interaction between apolipoprotein E and the remnant receptor, be absorbed by the liver, or they can be further hydrolyzed by hepatic lipase. Hydrolysis by hepatic lipase releases glycerol and fatty acids, leaving behind IDL remnants, called LDL, which contain a relatively high cholesterol content. LDL circulates and is absorbed by the liver and peripheral cells. Binding of LDL to its target tissue occurs through an interaction between the LDL receptor and apolipoprotein B-100 on the LDL particle. Absorption occurs through endocytosis, and the internalized LDL particles are hydrolyzed within lysosomes, releasing lipids, chiefly cholesterol  
  3. LDL particles in blood plasma invade the endothelium and become oxidized. A complex set of biochemical reactions regulates the oxidation of LDL, involving enzymes (such as Lp-LpA2) and free radical in the endothelium. Damage to the endothelium results in an inflammatory response. This is followed by adherence of blood circulating monocytes to the vascular bed lining, the endothelium, then by their migration to the sub-endothelial space, and further activation into monocyte-derived macrophages. The monocytes differentiate into macrophages, which ingest oxidized LDL, slowly turning into large "foam cells" – so-called because of their changed appearance resulting from the numerous internal cytoplasmic vesicles and resulting high lipid content. Under the microscope, the lesion now appears as a fatty streak. Foam cells eventually die, and further propagate the inflammatory process. There is also smooth muscle proliferation and migration from the tunica media into the intima responding to cytokines secreted by damaged endothelial cells. This causes the formation of a fibrous capsule covering the fatty streak
  4. Treatment was stopped after a median follow-up of 3.3 years. By that time, 100 primary events had occurred in the atorvastatin group compared with 154 events in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0.64 [95% CI 0.50-0.83], p=0.0005). This benefit emerged in the first year of follow-up. There was no significant heterogeneity among prespecified subgroups. Fatal and non-fatal stroke (89 atorvastatin vs 121 placebo, 0.73 [0.56-0.96], p=0.024), total cardiovascular events (389 vs 486, 0.79 [0.69-0.90], p=0.0005), and total coronary events (178 vs 247, 0.71 [0.59-0.86], p=0.0005) were also significantly lowered. There were 185 deaths in the atorvastatin group and 212 in the placebo group (0.87 [0.71-1.06], p=0.16). Atorvastatin lowered total serum cholesterol by about 1.3 mmol/L compared with placebo at 12 months, and by 1.1 mmol/L after 3 years of follow-up
  5. The trial was stopped after a median follow-up of 1.9 years (maximum, 5.0). Rosuvastatin reduced LDL cholesterol levels by 50% and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels by 37%. The rates of the primary end point were 0.77 and 1.36 per 100 person-years of follow-up in the rosuvastatin and placebo groups, respectively (hazard ratio for rosuvastatin, 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 0.69; P<0.00001), with corresponding rates of 0.17 and 0.37 for myocardial infarction (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.70; P=0.0002), 0.18 and 0.34 for stroke (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.79; P=0.002), 0.41 and 0.77 for revascularization or unstable angina (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.70; P<0.00001), 0.45 and 0.85 for the combined end point of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.69; P<0.00001), and 1.00 and 1.25 for death from any cause (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.97; P=0.02). Consistent effects were observed in all subgroups evaluated. The rosuvastatin group did not have a significant increase in myopathy or cancer but did have a higher incidence of physician-reported diabetes
  6. The relative risk of death in the simvastatin group was 0.70 (95% CI 0.58-0.85, p = 0.0003). The 6-year probabilities of survival in the placebo and simvastatin groups were 87.6% and 91.3%, respectively. There were 189 coronary deaths in the placebo group and 111 in the simvastatin group (relative risk 0.58, 95% CI 0.46-0.73), while noncardiovascular causes accounted for 49 and 46 deaths, respectively. 622 patients (28%) in the placebo group and 431 (19%) in the simvastatin group had one or more major coronary events. The relative risk was 0.66 (95% CI 0.59-0.75, p<0.00001), and the respective probabilities of escaping such events were 70.5% and 79.6%. This risk was also significantly reduced in subgroups consisting of women and patients of both sexes aged 60 or more. Other benefits of treatment included a 37% reduction (p<0.00001) in the risk of undergoing myocardial revascularisation procedures
  7. The median LDL cholesterol level achieved during treatment was 95 mg per deciliter (2.46 mmol per liter) in the standard-dose pravastatin group and 62 mg per deciliter (1.60 mmol per liter) in the high-dose atorvastatin group (P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier estimates of the rates of the primary end point at two years were 26.3 percent in the pravastatin group and 22.4 percent in the atorvastatin group, reflecting a 16 percent reduction in the hazard ratio in favor of atorvastatin (P=0.005; 95 percent confidence interval, 5 to 26 percent). The study did not meet the prespecified criterion for equivalence but did identify the superiority of the more intensive regimen
  8. Vital status was confirmed on all but 22 patients. Averaged over the 5 years' study duration, similar proportions in each group discontinued study medication (10% placebo vs 11% fenofibrate) and more patients allocated placebo (17%) than fenofibrate (8%; p<0.0001) commenced other lipid treatments, predominantly statins. 5.9% (n=288) of patients on placebo and 5.2% (n=256) of those on fenofibrate had a coronary event (relative reduction of 11%; hazard ratio [HR]0.89, 95% CI 0.75-1.05; p=0.16). This finding corresponds to a significant 24% reduction in non-fatal myocardial infarction (0.76, 0.62-0.94; p=0.010) and a non-significant increase in coronary heart disease mortality (1.19, 0.90-1.57; p=0.22). Total cardiovascular disease events were significantly reduced from 13.9% to 12.5% (0.89, 0.80-0.99; p=0.035). This finding included a 21% reduction in coronary revascularisation (0.79, 0.68-0.93; p=0.003). Total mortality was 6.6% in the placebo group and 7.3% in the fenofibrate group (p=0.18). Fenofibrate was associated with less albuminuria progression (p=0.002), and less retinopathy needing laser treatment (5.2%vs 3.6%, p=0.0003). There was a slight increase in pancreatitis (0.5%vs 0.8%, p=0.031) and pulmonary embolism (0.7%vs 1.1%, p=0.022), but no other significant adverse effects.
  9. The annual rate of the primary outcome was 2.2% in the fenofibrate group and 2.4% in the placebo group (hazard ratio in the fenofibrate group, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 1.08; P=0.32). There were also no significant differences between the two study groups with respect to any secondary outcome. Annual rates of death were 1.5% in the fenofibrate group and 1.6% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.10; P=0.33). Prespecified subgroup analyses suggested heterogeneity in treatment effect according to sex, with a benefit for men and possible harm for women (P=0.01 for interaction), and a possible interaction according to lipid subgroup, with a possible benefit for patients with both a high baseline triglyceride level and a low baseline level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P=0.057 for interaction
  10. At 2 years, niacin therapy had significantly increased the median HDL cholesterol level from 35 mg per deciliter (0.91 mmol per liter) to 42 mg per deciliter (1.08 mmol per liter), lowered the triglyceride level from 164 mg per deciliter (1.85 mmol per liter) to 122 mg per deciliter (1.38 mmol per liter), and lowered the LDL cholesterol level from 74 mg per deciliter (1.91 mmol per liter) to 62 mg per deciliter (1.60 mmol per liter). The primary end point occurred in 282 patients in the niacin group (16.4%) and in 274 patients in the placebo group (16.2%) (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.87 to 1.21; P=0.79 by the log-rank test).
  11. Laropirant – prostaglandin receptor antagonist During a median follow-up period of 3.9 years, participants who were assigned to extended-release niacin-laropiprant had an LDL cholesterol level that was an average of 10 mg per deciliter (0.25 mmol per liter as measured in the central laboratory) lower and an HDL cholesterol level that was an average of 6 mg per deciliter (0.16 mmol per liter) higher than the levels in those assigned to placebo. Assignment to niacin-laropiprant, as compared with assignment to placebo, had no significant effect on the incidence of major vascular events (13.2% and 13.7% of participants with an event, respectively; rate ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 1.03; P=0.29). Niacin-laropiprant was associated with an increased incidence of disturbances in diabetes control that were considered to be serious (absolute excess as compared with placebo, 3.7 percentage points; P<0.001) and with an increased incidence of diabetes diagnoses (absolute excess, 1.3 percentage points; P<0.001), as well as increases in serious adverse events associated with the gastrointestinal system (absolute excess, 1.0 percentage point; P<0.001), musculoskeletal system (absolute excess, 0.7 percentage points; P<0.001), skin (absolute excess, 0.3 percentage points; P=0.003), and unexpectedly, infection (absolute excess, 1.4 percentage points; P<0.001) and bleeding (absolute excess, 0.7 percentage points; P<0.001).
  12. The median time-weighted average LDL cholesterol level during the study was 53.7 mg per deciliter (1.4 mmol per liter) in the simvastatin-ezetimibe group, as compared with 69.5 mg per deciliter (1.8 mmol per liter) in the simvastatin-monotherapy group (P<0.001). The Kaplan-Meier event rate for the primary end point at 7 years was 32.7% in the simvastatin-ezetimibe group, as compared with 34.7% in the simvastatin-monotherapy group (absolute risk difference, 2.0 percentage points; hazard ratio, 0.936; 95% confidence interval, 0.89 to 0.99; P=0.016). Rates of prespecified muscle, gallbladder, and hepatic adverse effects and cancer were similar in the two groups
  13.  Shan L, Pang L, Zhang R, Murgolo NJ, Lan H, Hedrick JA (October 2008). "PCSK9 binds to multiple receptors and can be functionally inhibited by an EGF-A peptide". Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 375 (1): 69–73.doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.07.106. PMID 18675252. Jump up^ Graham MJ, Lemonidis KM, Whipple CP, Subramaniam A, Monia BP, Crooke ST, Crooke RM (April 2007). "Antisense inhibition of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 reduces serum LDL in hyperlipidemic mice".J. Lipid Res. 48 (4): 763–7. doi:10.1194/jlr.C600025-JLR200.PMID 17242417.
  14. The best-known biological function of PCSK9 is regulation of cholesterol homeostasis via accelerating the degradation of LDL receptor (LDLR). This degradation is the result of direct binding of PCSK9 to LDLR (on the extracellular EGF-A domain), followed by clathrin-mediated cellular internalization. After endocytosis, PCSK9 decreases the LDLR density on the surface of hepatocytes either through inhibition of receptor recycling or through directing LDLR to lysosomal catabolism
  15. Antisense therapy is a form of treatment for genetic disorders or infections. When the genetic sequence of a particular gene is known to be causative of a particular disease, it is possible to synthesize a strand of nucleic acid (DNA,RNA or a chemical analogue) that will bind to the messenger RNA (mRNA) produced by that gene and inactivate it, effectively turning that gene "off“ Locked nucleic acid - often referred to as inaccessible RNA, is a modified RNA nucleotide. The ribose moiety of an LNA nucleotide is modified with an extra bridge connecting the 2' oxygen and 4' carbon. The bridge "locks" the ribose in the 3'-endo (North) conformation, which is often found in the A-form duplexes RNA interference (RNAi) is a biological process in which RNA molecules inhibit gene expression, typically by causing the destruction of specific mRNA molecules
  16.  At week 24, the difference between the alirocumab and placebo groups in the mean percentage change from baseline in calculated LDL cholesterol level was −62 percentage points (P<0.001); the treatment effect remained consistent over a period of 78 weeks. The alirocumab group, as compared with the placebo group, had higher rates of injection-site reactions (5.9% vs. 4.2%), myalgia (5.4% vs. 2.9%), neurocognitive events (1.2% vs. 0.5%), and ophthalmologic events (2.9% vs. 1.9%). In a post hoc analysis, the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (death from coronary heart disease, nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal or nonfatal ischemic stroke, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization) was lower with alirocumab than with placebo (1.7% vs. 3.3%; hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.90; nominal P=0.02)
  17.  Estel Grace Masangkay, "Amgen Phase III GAUSS-2 Trial of Evolocumab (AMG 145) Meets Co-Primary Endpoints Of LDL Cholesterol Reduction", Bioresearch Online (January 24 2014) Pierson, Ransdell (17 March 2014). "Amgen drug meets goal for those with high genetic cholesterol". Associated Press. Retrieved 19 March 2014.
  18. This guideline recommends using the new Pooled Cohort Risk Assessment Equations developed by the Risk Assessment Work Group to estimate the 10-year ASCVD risk (acute coronary syndromes, a history of MI, stable or unstable angina, coronary or other arterial revascularization, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or peripheral arterial disease presumed to be of atherosclerotic origin) for the identification of candidates for statin therapy (see http://my.americanheart.org/cvriskcalculator and http://www.cardiosource.org/en/Science-And-Quality/Practice-Guidelinesand-Quality-Standards/2013-Prevention-Guideline-Tools.aspx for risk calculator). These equations should be used to predict stroke as well as CHD events in non-Hispanic, Caucasian, and African-American women and men 40 to 79 years of age with or without diabetes who have LDL-C levels 70 to 189 mg/dL and are not receiving statin therapy
  19. Summary of Statin Initiation Recommendations for the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce ASCVD Risk in Adults Colors correspond to the Classes of Recommendation in Table 1. Assessment of the potential for benefit and risk from statin therapy for ASCVD prevention provides the framework for clinical decision making incorporating patient preferences.
  20. *Percent reduction in LDL-C can be used as an indication of response and adherence to therapy, but is not in itself a treatment goal. †The Pooled Cohort Equations can be used to estimate 10-year ASCVD risk in individuals With and without diabetes. The estimator within this application should be used to inform decision making in primary prevention patients Not on a statin.
  21. ‡Consider moderate-intensity statin as more appropriate in low-risk individuals. §For those in whom a risk assessment is uncertain, consider factors such as primary LDL-C =160 mg/dL or other evidence of genetic hyperlipidemias, family history of premature ASCVD with onset <55 years of age in a first-degree male relative or <65 years of age in a first-degree female relative, hs-CRP =2 mg/L, CAC score =300 Agatston units, or =75th percentile for age, sex, and ethnicity (for additional information, see http://www.mesa-nhlbi. org/CACReference.aspx), ABI <0.9, or lifetime risk of ASCVD. Additional factors that may aid in individual risk assessment may be identified in the future. ‖Potential ASCVD risk-reduction benefits. The absolute reduction in ASCVD events from moderate- or high-intensity Statin therapy can be approximated by multiplying the estimated 10-year ASCVD risk by the anticipated relative-risk reduction from the Intensity of statin initiated (~30% for moderate-intensity statin or ~45% for high-intensity statin therapy). The net ASCVD risk-reduction benefit is estimated from the number of potential ASCVD events prevented with a statin, compared to the number of potential excess adverse effects. ¶Potential adverse effects. The excess risk of diabetes is the main consideration in ~0.1 excess cases per 100 individuals treated with a moderate-intensity statin for 1 year and ~0.3 excess cases per 100 individuals treated with a high-intensity statin for 1 year. In RCTs, both statin-treated and placebo-treated participants experienced the same rate of muscle symptoms. The actual rate of statin-related muscle symptoms in the clinical population is unclear. Muscle symptoms attributed to statin therapy should be evaluated (see Table 8, Safety Recommendation 8). ABI indicates ankle-brachial index; ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CAC, coronary artery calcium; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MI, myocardial infarction; and RCT, randomized controlled trial.)