SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 28
Presented by:
Vendula Angerova, Jazel Borja, Jessica Bradham, Demaria Woods
 There are many factors that can affect a student’s GPA, both internal
and external. For our project, we were interested in looking at the
affects of a couple of external factors: coarse load and employment
status
 In order to begin our research, we created an online survey, the link
to which we posted on social media
In order to gather information
about students at the
University of Houston, we
created a survey on
surveymonkey.com and
posted the link to social
media. We received 65
unique responses to our
survey.
Some of the data we
collected from the survey
 We expect:
68% of the data to fall within 2.572 and 3.963
95% of the data to fall within 1.878 and 4.0
99.7% of the data to fall within 1.183 and 4.0
 In reality:
89% of the data fell within 2.572 and 3.963
95% of the data fell within 1.878 and 4.0
99.7% of the data fell within 1.183 and 4.0
 From these measurements, we can deduce that the data is not normally
distributed.
Our first question considered how working a job while in
school affected a student’s grade point average.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 - 2.00 2.00 - 2.5 2.5 - 3.00 3.00 - 3.5 3.5 - 3.75 3.75 - 4.00
NumberOfStudents
GPA
GPA vs. Number of Hours Worked Per Week
40 hours /week 30 - 20 hours/week 15 - 0 hours/week
GPA Range
40 or more
hours /week
30 - 20
hours/week
15 - 0
hours/week
Total by
GPA
0 - 2.00 2 0 1 3
2.00 - 2.5 2 2 0 4
2.5 - 3.00 3 3 5 11
3.00 - 3.5 1 5 11 17
3.5 - 3.75 2 1 8 11
3.75 - 4.00 2 5 12 19
Total by hours 12 16 37
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
40 30 20 15 10 0
Mean
Hours Worked
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
40 30 20 15 10 0
Median
Hours Worked
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
40 30 20 15 10 0
Range
Hours Worked
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
40 30 20 15 10 0
LowerQuartile
Hours Worked
3.5
3.55
3.6
3.65
3.7
3.75
3.8
3.85
3.9
40 30 20 15 10 0
UpperQuartile
Hours Worked
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
40 30 20 15 10 0
StandardDeviation
Hours Worked
Number of Hours Worked per Week GPA
40 or more 2.19 – 3.31
30 2.56 – 4.06
20 2.93 – 3.53
15 3.05 – 3.54
10 – 5 2.65 – 4.01
0 3.37 – 3.69
 Hypothesis – Students at the University of Houston that work less than 15 hours a
week have a higher GPA than those who work more than 20 hours a week.
 Null and alternative hypotheses
H0: (m<15 – m>20) = 0
Ha: (m<15 – m>20) > 0
 Test statistic
z = 2.021
 Level of significance: 5%
 P-value
p = 0.0217
Our second question considered how taking different
class loads affected a student’s grade point average.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 - 2.00 2.00 - 2.5 2.5 - 3.00 3.00 - 3.5 3.5 - 3.75 3.75 - 4.00
NumberofStudents
GPA
GPA vs. Number of Credit Hours
18 Credit Hours 15 Credit Hours 12 Credit Hours 9 - 6 Credit Hours
GPA Range
18 Credit
Hours
15 Credit Hours 12 Credit Hours
9 - 6 Credit
Hours
Total by GPA
0 - 2.00 0 0 1 2 3
2.00 - 2.5 0 0 2 2 4
2.5 - 3.00 1 1 7 2 11
3.00 - 3.5 0 11 4 2 17
3.5 - 3.75 0 6 4 1 11
3.75 - 4.00 7 5 2 5 19
Total by Credit Hours 8 23 20 14
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
18 15 12 9 6
Mean
Credit Hours
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
18 15 12 9 6
Median
Credit Hours
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
18 15 12 9 6
Range
Credit Hours
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
18 15 12 9 6
LowerQuartile
Credit Hours
3.45
3.5
3.55
3.6
3.65
3.7
3.75
3.8
3.85
3.9
18 15 12 9 6
UpperQuartile
Credit Hours
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
18 15 12 9 6
StandardDeviation
Credit Hours
Number of Credit Hours per Semester GPA
18 or more 3.46 – 4.01
15 3.34 – 3.59
12 2.70 – 3.30
9 2.93 – 3.76
6 or less 1.42 – 3.50
 Hypothesis – Students at the University of Houston that take 15 hours will have a
higher GPA than all other students.
 Null and alternative hypotheses
H0: (m15 – m!15) = 0
Ha: (m15 – m!15) > 0
 Test Statistic
z = 2.788
 Level of significance: 5%
 P-value
p = 0.0026
 In both hypothesis tests, we found evidence to reject the null hypotheses of no
difference between GPAs in favor of our alternative hypotheses, which theorized that
both holding a job and taking differing amounts of course work affected GPA
 The confidence intervals for the difference between means are in further support of
those ideas:
(m<15 – m>20) = 0.122 – 0.700
(m15 – m!15) = (-0.707) – (-0.0108)
 Mendenhall, William, Robert J. Beaver, and Barbara M. Beaver. Introduction to
Probability and Statistics. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole, 2013. PDF.
 “How does having a job affect a student’s GPA?” SurveyMonkey: Free Online Survey
Software & Questionnaire Tool. Jessica Bradham, 3 March 2015. Web. 18 April 2015.
<https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/6NMTJFT>.

More Related Content

What's hot

TS Pgecet Bio Technology 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Bio Technology 2018 Answer KeyTS Pgecet Bio Technology 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Bio Technology 2018 Answer KeyEneutron
 
TS Pgecet Geo Engineering 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Geo Engineering 2018 Answer KeyTS Pgecet Geo Engineering 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Geo Engineering 2018 Answer KeyEneutron
 
TS Pgecet Architecture 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Architecture 2018 Answer KeyTS Pgecet Architecture 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Architecture 2018 Answer KeyEneutron
 
TS Pgecet Chemical 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Chemical 2018 Answer KeyTS Pgecet Chemical 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Chemical 2018 Answer KeyEneutron
 
TS Pgecet Civil 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Civil 2018 Answer KeyTS Pgecet Civil 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Civil 2018 Answer KeyEneutron
 
TS Pgecet Aerospace 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Aerospace 2018 Answer KeyTS Pgecet Aerospace 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Aerospace 2018 Answer KeyEneutron
 
TS Pgecet Food Technology 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Food Technology 2018 Answer KeyTS Pgecet Food Technology 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Food Technology 2018 Answer KeyEneutron
 
TS Pgecet Computer Science 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Computer Science 2018 Answer KeyTS Pgecet Computer Science 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Computer Science 2018 Answer KeyEneutron
 
TS Pgecet Bio Medical 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Bio Medical 2018 Answer KeyTS Pgecet Bio Medical 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Bio Medical 2018 Answer KeyEneutron
 
TS Pgecet Pharmacy 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Pharmacy 2018 Answer KeyTS Pgecet Pharmacy 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Pharmacy 2018 Answer KeyEneutron
 
TS Pgecet Nano Technology 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Nano Technology 2018 Answer KeyTS Pgecet Nano Technology 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Nano Technology 2018 Answer KeyEneutron
 
TS Pgecet E & C 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet E & C 2018 Answer KeyTS Pgecet E & C 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet E & C 2018 Answer KeyEneutron
 

What's hot (13)

TS Pgecet Bio Technology 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Bio Technology 2018 Answer KeyTS Pgecet Bio Technology 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Bio Technology 2018 Answer Key
 
TS Pgecet Geo Engineering 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Geo Engineering 2018 Answer KeyTS Pgecet Geo Engineering 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Geo Engineering 2018 Answer Key
 
TS Pgecet Architecture 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Architecture 2018 Answer KeyTS Pgecet Architecture 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Architecture 2018 Answer Key
 
TS Pgecet Chemical 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Chemical 2018 Answer KeyTS Pgecet Chemical 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Chemical 2018 Answer Key
 
TS Pgecet Civil 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Civil 2018 Answer KeyTS Pgecet Civil 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Civil 2018 Answer Key
 
TS Pgecet Aerospace 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Aerospace 2018 Answer KeyTS Pgecet Aerospace 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Aerospace 2018 Answer Key
 
TS Pgecet Food Technology 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Food Technology 2018 Answer KeyTS Pgecet Food Technology 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Food Technology 2018 Answer Key
 
TS Pgecet Computer Science 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Computer Science 2018 Answer KeyTS Pgecet Computer Science 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Computer Science 2018 Answer Key
 
TS Pgecet Bio Medical 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Bio Medical 2018 Answer KeyTS Pgecet Bio Medical 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Bio Medical 2018 Answer Key
 
TS Pgecet Pharmacy 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Pharmacy 2018 Answer KeyTS Pgecet Pharmacy 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Pharmacy 2018 Answer Key
 
TS Pgecet Nano Technology 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Nano Technology 2018 Answer KeyTS Pgecet Nano Technology 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet Nano Technology 2018 Answer Key
 
TS Pgecet E & C 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet E & C 2018 Answer KeyTS Pgecet E & C 2018 Answer Key
TS Pgecet E & C 2018 Answer Key
 
研究発表資料改
研究発表資料改研究発表資料改
研究発表資料改
 

Viewers also liked

Diagrama de concentraciones mtc
Diagrama de concentraciones mtcDiagrama de concentraciones mtc
Diagrama de concentraciones mtcLeomeza
 
Licencia para mi blog
Licencia para mi blogLicencia para mi blog
Licencia para mi blogjakymey
 
Nuevo ciclo de convivencia con la psicóloga natalia
Nuevo ciclo de convivencia con la psicóloga nataliaNuevo ciclo de convivencia con la psicóloga natalia
Nuevo ciclo de convivencia con la psicóloga nataliadanii muñoz
 
GUIA 1. la Estequiometría febrero 4
GUIA 1. la  Estequiometría febrero 4GUIA 1. la  Estequiometría febrero 4
GUIA 1. la Estequiometría febrero 4proyectosdecorazon
 
Guia No 3 Propiedades Periódicas
Guia No 3    Propiedades PeriódicasGuia No 3    Propiedades Periódicas
Guia No 3 Propiedades PeriódicasCARMENZA2016
 
Encuesta diagnóstica estudiantes maz 16 (1)
Encuesta diagnóstica  estudiantes maz 16 (1)Encuesta diagnóstica  estudiantes maz 16 (1)
Encuesta diagnóstica estudiantes maz 16 (1)proyectosdecorazon
 
Guia no 5 Formula Minima y Empirica
Guia no 5  Formula Minima y EmpiricaGuia no 5  Formula Minima y Empirica
Guia no 5 Formula Minima y EmpiricaCARMENZA2016
 

Viewers also liked (11)

Diagrama de concentraciones mtc
Diagrama de concentraciones mtcDiagrama de concentraciones mtc
Diagrama de concentraciones mtc
 
Dispositivos de entrada
Dispositivos de entradaDispositivos de entrada
Dispositivos de entrada
 
Lol
LolLol
Lol
 
Alarcon bauman4.2
Alarcon bauman4.2Alarcon bauman4.2
Alarcon bauman4.2
 
Licencia para mi blog
Licencia para mi blogLicencia para mi blog
Licencia para mi blog
 
Nuevo ciclo de convivencia con la psicóloga natalia
Nuevo ciclo de convivencia con la psicóloga nataliaNuevo ciclo de convivencia con la psicóloga natalia
Nuevo ciclo de convivencia con la psicóloga natalia
 
GUIA 1. la Estequiometría febrero 4
GUIA 1. la  Estequiometría febrero 4GUIA 1. la  Estequiometría febrero 4
GUIA 1. la Estequiometría febrero 4
 
Presentacion psicologia
Presentacion psicologiaPresentacion psicologia
Presentacion psicologia
 
Guia No 3 Propiedades Periódicas
Guia No 3    Propiedades PeriódicasGuia No 3    Propiedades Periódicas
Guia No 3 Propiedades Periódicas
 
Encuesta diagnóstica estudiantes maz 16 (1)
Encuesta diagnóstica  estudiantes maz 16 (1)Encuesta diagnóstica  estudiantes maz 16 (1)
Encuesta diagnóstica estudiantes maz 16 (1)
 
Guia no 5 Formula Minima y Empirica
Guia no 5  Formula Minima y EmpiricaGuia no 5  Formula Minima y Empirica
Guia no 5 Formula Minima y Empirica
 

Similar to Affect of Holding a Job and Course Load on a Student's GPA

Employee Retension Capstone Project - Neeraj Bubby.pptx
Employee Retension Capstone Project - Neeraj Bubby.pptxEmployee Retension Capstone Project - Neeraj Bubby.pptx
Employee Retension Capstone Project - Neeraj Bubby.pptxBoston Institute of Analytics
 
Washington D.C. Internship portfolio, work samples
Washington D.C. Internship portfolio, work samplesWashington D.C. Internship portfolio, work samples
Washington D.C. Internship portfolio, work samplesSatu Hermunen
 
howtoturnbigdataintobetterdecisionspauwelsemac2016
howtoturnbigdataintobetterdecisionspauwelsemac2016howtoturnbigdataintobetterdecisionspauwelsemac2016
howtoturnbigdataintobetterdecisionspauwelsemac2016Koen Pauwels
 
Sales structurization in academic publishing
Sales structurization in academic publishingSales structurization in academic publishing
Sales structurization in academic publishingDebjit Biswas
 
A study of graduate & post graduate students regarding their career plans
A study of graduate & post graduate students regarding their career plansA study of graduate & post graduate students regarding their career plans
A study of graduate & post graduate students regarding their career plansVaibhav Vaidya
 
Metrics and Measurement Work Sampling Project
Metrics and Measurement Work Sampling ProjectMetrics and Measurement Work Sampling Project
Metrics and Measurement Work Sampling ProjectDivyang Choudhary
 
How do quality improvement (QI) tools and methods contribute to healthcare im...
How do quality improvement (QI) tools and methods contribute to healthcare im...How do quality improvement (QI) tools and methods contribute to healthcare im...
How do quality improvement (QI) tools and methods contribute to healthcare im...Institute for Knowledge Mobilization
 
The Happiness Gap
The Happiness GapThe Happiness Gap
The Happiness GapJoe Pych
 
CECL Methodology - CRE Loan Pools
CECL Methodology - CRE Loan PoolsCECL Methodology - CRE Loan Pools
CECL Methodology - CRE Loan PoolsLibby Bierman
 
Reflections in the Mirror 2014: Defined contribution plan participants offer...
 Reflections in the Mirror 2014: Defined contribution plan participants offer... Reflections in the Mirror 2014: Defined contribution plan participants offer...
Reflections in the Mirror 2014: Defined contribution plan participants offer...The 401k Study Group ®
 
Overtime in Quantity Surveying Firms in Malaysia
Overtime in Quantity Surveying Firms in MalaysiaOvertime in Quantity Surveying Firms in Malaysia
Overtime in Quantity Surveying Firms in MalaysiaIshka Rogbeer
 
BIMS Data CollectionQNT351October 27, 2013Running.docx
BIMS Data CollectionQNT351October 27, 2013Running.docxBIMS Data CollectionQNT351October 27, 2013Running.docx
BIMS Data CollectionQNT351October 27, 2013Running.docxhartrobert670
 
How to Understand the ROI of Investing in People
How to Understand the ROI of Investing in PeopleHow to Understand the ROI of Investing in People
How to Understand the ROI of Investing in PeopleGreenhouseSoftware
 
2020 Omnibus survey of 1,000 Canadians
2020 Omnibus survey of 1,000 Canadians2020 Omnibus survey of 1,000 Canadians
2020 Omnibus survey of 1,000 CanadiansJoanne Acri
 
Forward-Looking ALLL: Computing Qualitative Adjustments
Forward-Looking ALLL: Computing Qualitative AdjustmentsForward-Looking ALLL: Computing Qualitative Adjustments
Forward-Looking ALLL: Computing Qualitative AdjustmentsLibby Bierman
 
Extending working lives and age discrimination
Extending working lives and age discriminationExtending working lives and age discrimination
Extending working lives and age discriminationMark Beatson
 

Similar to Affect of Holding a Job and Course Load on a Student's GPA (20)

Employee Retension Capstone Project - Neeraj Bubby.pptx
Employee Retension Capstone Project - Neeraj Bubby.pptxEmployee Retension Capstone Project - Neeraj Bubby.pptx
Employee Retension Capstone Project - Neeraj Bubby.pptx
 
Washington D.C. Internship portfolio, work samples
Washington D.C. Internship portfolio, work samplesWashington D.C. Internship portfolio, work samples
Washington D.C. Internship portfolio, work samples
 
howtoturnbigdataintobetterdecisionspauwelsemac2016
howtoturnbigdataintobetterdecisionspauwelsemac2016howtoturnbigdataintobetterdecisionspauwelsemac2016
howtoturnbigdataintobetterdecisionspauwelsemac2016
 
Sales structurization in academic publishing
Sales structurization in academic publishingSales structurization in academic publishing
Sales structurization in academic publishing
 
Summit on Youth in NS Economy
Summit on Youth in NS EconomySummit on Youth in NS Economy
Summit on Youth in NS Economy
 
KANBAN FOR IT OPS (DRAGOS DUMITRIU) - LKCE13
KANBAN FOR IT OPS (DRAGOS DUMITRIU) - LKCE13KANBAN FOR IT OPS (DRAGOS DUMITRIU) - LKCE13
KANBAN FOR IT OPS (DRAGOS DUMITRIU) - LKCE13
 
A study of graduate & post graduate students regarding their career plans
A study of graduate & post graduate students regarding their career plansA study of graduate & post graduate students regarding their career plans
A study of graduate & post graduate students regarding their career plans
 
Metrics and Measurement Work Sampling Project
Metrics and Measurement Work Sampling ProjectMetrics and Measurement Work Sampling Project
Metrics and Measurement Work Sampling Project
 
How do quality improvement (QI) tools and methods contribute to healthcare im...
How do quality improvement (QI) tools and methods contribute to healthcare im...How do quality improvement (QI) tools and methods contribute to healthcare im...
How do quality improvement (QI) tools and methods contribute to healthcare im...
 
The Happiness Gap
The Happiness GapThe Happiness Gap
The Happiness Gap
 
CECL Methodology - CRE Loan Pools
CECL Methodology - CRE Loan PoolsCECL Methodology - CRE Loan Pools
CECL Methodology - CRE Loan Pools
 
Reflections in the Mirror 2014: Defined contribution plan participants offer...
 Reflections in the Mirror 2014: Defined contribution plan participants offer... Reflections in the Mirror 2014: Defined contribution plan participants offer...
Reflections in the Mirror 2014: Defined contribution plan participants offer...
 
Overtime in Quantity Surveying Firms in Malaysia
Overtime in Quantity Surveying Firms in MalaysiaOvertime in Quantity Surveying Firms in Malaysia
Overtime in Quantity Surveying Firms in Malaysia
 
The Compliance Tsunami
The Compliance TsunamiThe Compliance Tsunami
The Compliance Tsunami
 
Communication audit
Communication auditCommunication audit
Communication audit
 
BIMS Data CollectionQNT351October 27, 2013Running.docx
BIMS Data CollectionQNT351October 27, 2013Running.docxBIMS Data CollectionQNT351October 27, 2013Running.docx
BIMS Data CollectionQNT351October 27, 2013Running.docx
 
How to Understand the ROI of Investing in People
How to Understand the ROI of Investing in PeopleHow to Understand the ROI of Investing in People
How to Understand the ROI of Investing in People
 
2020 Omnibus survey of 1,000 Canadians
2020 Omnibus survey of 1,000 Canadians2020 Omnibus survey of 1,000 Canadians
2020 Omnibus survey of 1,000 Canadians
 
Forward-Looking ALLL: Computing Qualitative Adjustments
Forward-Looking ALLL: Computing Qualitative AdjustmentsForward-Looking ALLL: Computing Qualitative Adjustments
Forward-Looking ALLL: Computing Qualitative Adjustments
 
Extending working lives and age discrimination
Extending working lives and age discriminationExtending working lives and age discrimination
Extending working lives and age discrimination
 

Affect of Holding a Job and Course Load on a Student's GPA

  • 1. Presented by: Vendula Angerova, Jazel Borja, Jessica Bradham, Demaria Woods
  • 2.  There are many factors that can affect a student’s GPA, both internal and external. For our project, we were interested in looking at the affects of a couple of external factors: coarse load and employment status  In order to begin our research, we created an online survey, the link to which we posted on social media
  • 3. In order to gather information about students at the University of Houston, we created a survey on surveymonkey.com and posted the link to social media. We received 65 unique responses to our survey.
  • 4. Some of the data we collected from the survey
  • 5.  We expect: 68% of the data to fall within 2.572 and 3.963 95% of the data to fall within 1.878 and 4.0 99.7% of the data to fall within 1.183 and 4.0  In reality: 89% of the data fell within 2.572 and 3.963 95% of the data fell within 1.878 and 4.0 99.7% of the data fell within 1.183 and 4.0  From these measurements, we can deduce that the data is not normally distributed.
  • 6. Our first question considered how working a job while in school affected a student’s grade point average.
  • 7. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 - 2.00 2.00 - 2.5 2.5 - 3.00 3.00 - 3.5 3.5 - 3.75 3.75 - 4.00 NumberOfStudents GPA GPA vs. Number of Hours Worked Per Week 40 hours /week 30 - 20 hours/week 15 - 0 hours/week GPA Range 40 or more hours /week 30 - 20 hours/week 15 - 0 hours/week Total by GPA 0 - 2.00 2 0 1 3 2.00 - 2.5 2 2 0 4 2.5 - 3.00 3 3 5 11 3.00 - 3.5 1 5 11 17 3.5 - 3.75 2 1 8 11 3.75 - 4.00 2 5 12 19 Total by hours 12 16 37
  • 8. 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 40 30 20 15 10 0 Mean Hours Worked
  • 9. 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 40 30 20 15 10 0 Median Hours Worked
  • 10. 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 40 30 20 15 10 0 Range Hours Worked
  • 11. 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40 30 20 15 10 0 LowerQuartile Hours Worked
  • 12. 3.5 3.55 3.6 3.65 3.7 3.75 3.8 3.85 3.9 40 30 20 15 10 0 UpperQuartile Hours Worked
  • 13. 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 40 30 20 15 10 0 StandardDeviation Hours Worked
  • 14. Number of Hours Worked per Week GPA 40 or more 2.19 – 3.31 30 2.56 – 4.06 20 2.93 – 3.53 15 3.05 – 3.54 10 – 5 2.65 – 4.01 0 3.37 – 3.69
  • 15.  Hypothesis – Students at the University of Houston that work less than 15 hours a week have a higher GPA than those who work more than 20 hours a week.  Null and alternative hypotheses H0: (m<15 – m>20) = 0 Ha: (m<15 – m>20) > 0  Test statistic z = 2.021  Level of significance: 5%  P-value p = 0.0217
  • 16. Our second question considered how taking different class loads affected a student’s grade point average.
  • 17. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 - 2.00 2.00 - 2.5 2.5 - 3.00 3.00 - 3.5 3.5 - 3.75 3.75 - 4.00 NumberofStudents GPA GPA vs. Number of Credit Hours 18 Credit Hours 15 Credit Hours 12 Credit Hours 9 - 6 Credit Hours GPA Range 18 Credit Hours 15 Credit Hours 12 Credit Hours 9 - 6 Credit Hours Total by GPA 0 - 2.00 0 0 1 2 3 2.00 - 2.5 0 0 2 2 4 2.5 - 3.00 1 1 7 2 11 3.00 - 3.5 0 11 4 2 17 3.5 - 3.75 0 6 4 1 11 3.75 - 4.00 7 5 2 5 19 Total by Credit Hours 8 23 20 14
  • 18. 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 18 15 12 9 6 Mean Credit Hours
  • 19. 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 18 15 12 9 6 Median Credit Hours
  • 20. 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 18 15 12 9 6 Range Credit Hours
  • 21. 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 18 15 12 9 6 LowerQuartile Credit Hours
  • 23. 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 18 15 12 9 6 StandardDeviation Credit Hours
  • 24. Number of Credit Hours per Semester GPA 18 or more 3.46 – 4.01 15 3.34 – 3.59 12 2.70 – 3.30 9 2.93 – 3.76 6 or less 1.42 – 3.50
  • 25.  Hypothesis – Students at the University of Houston that take 15 hours will have a higher GPA than all other students.  Null and alternative hypotheses H0: (m15 – m!15) = 0 Ha: (m15 – m!15) > 0  Test Statistic z = 2.788  Level of significance: 5%  P-value p = 0.0026
  • 26.
  • 27.  In both hypothesis tests, we found evidence to reject the null hypotheses of no difference between GPAs in favor of our alternative hypotheses, which theorized that both holding a job and taking differing amounts of course work affected GPA  The confidence intervals for the difference between means are in further support of those ideas: (m<15 – m>20) = 0.122 – 0.700 (m15 – m!15) = (-0.707) – (-0.0108)
  • 28.  Mendenhall, William, Robert J. Beaver, and Barbara M. Beaver. Introduction to Probability and Statistics. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole, 2013. PDF.  “How does having a job affect a student’s GPA?” SurveyMonkey: Free Online Survey Software & Questionnaire Tool. Jessica Bradham, 3 March 2015. Web. 18 April 2015. <https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/6NMTJFT>.

Editor's Notes

  1. Our team did a survey on how holding a job along with their class load can affect their Grade Point Average.
  2. There are many factors that can affect a student’s GPA, we focused on how the amount of hours on their course load and the amount of hours working.  We created an online survey and received 65 responses.
  3. The survey was created on Survey Monkey, asking these 6 questions to gather our data.
  4. Using the data retrieved, we were able to find out the information needed
  5. According to the empirical rule, the data revealed 89% of students’ GPA that fell within 2.572 and 3.963 and 95% that fell within 1.878 and 4.0.  From these measurements, the data was not normally distributed.
  6. Our first question considered how working a job (measured by hours worked per week) while in school affected a student’s grade point average.
  7. This graph represents the average GPA for students who work 40, 30, 20, 15 hours per week or do not work. We can see that the average GPA is lower for students who work full time than for those who work part time
  8. This graph represents a middle value for GPA. We can see that the GPA is higher for students who work less than 10 hours per week
  9. The range represents the difference between the highest and lowest GPA. As we can see, the most significant change is for 40 hours and 10 hours per week
  10. The lower quartile represents the median of the lower half of the data set. As we can see, the lower quartile is almost identical to the median graph.
  11. The upper quartile represents the median of the upper half of the data set. In our example, the upper median is significantly higher for students working 30 hours per week and 10 or less hours per week
  12. The standard deviation measures how far typical values tend to be from the mean. We can see that data representing 40 hours per week and 10 hours per week are 1 standard deviation from the mean. The rest of the data is less than one standard deviation from the mean, so the values in a dataset are pretty tightly bunched together
  13. The confidence intervals show an estimated range into which the mean of the population will likely fall. Here, we have calculated 95% confidence intervals of the mean of the GPA for each category of students based on how much they work per week. We can begin to infer from the intervals that those students who did not work at all likely have the higher GPAs when compared to students who work at least a few hours per week.
  14. Our hypothesis is that students at the University of Houston who work less than 15 hours a week will have a higher average GPA than students who work more than 20 hours per week. In opposition, our null hypothesis states that the mean GPAs of students who worked 15 hours or less and that of students who work 20 hours or more are equal. We set our level of significance at 5%, and calculated a test statistic of 2.021 from the data we collected. Using Table 3 in Appendix 1 of the textbook, we found a p-value of 0.0217, therefore, we reject the null hypothesis. This means that there is statistically significant evidence that our alternative hypothesis is correct.
  15. Our second question considered how taking different class loads (measured by credit hours per semester) affected a student’s grade point average.
  16. This graph represents the average GPA for students who take 18, 15, 12, 9 or 6 credit hours per semester. We can see that surprisingly the average GPA is higher for students who take the max amount of credit hours.
  17. This graph represents a middle value for GPA. Again, we can see that the GPA is higher for students who take 18 credit hours per semester
  18. The range represents the difference between the highest and lowest GPA. As we can see, the most significant change is for 12 credit hours and 6 credit hours per week
  19. The lower quartile represents the median of the lower half of the data set. As we can see, the lower quartile is almost identical to the median graph.
  20. The upper quartile represents the median of the upper half of the data set. In our example, the upper median is significantly higher for students who take 18 credit hours per semester and 9 credit hours per semester
  21. The standard deviation measures how far typical values tend to be from the mean. We can see that data representing 6 credit hours are 1 standard deviation from the mean. The rest of the data is less than one standard deviation from the mean, so the values in a dataset are pretty tightly bunched together
  22. Here, we have constructed 95% confidence intervals of the mean of the GPA for each category of students based on how many credit hours they take per semester. These results show a slightly more interesting idea that those for working hours. We can infer from the results that students who take 18 credit hours or more every semester have the highest range of mean values for the population, despite having the most school work every semester.
  23. Our hypothesis claims that those students who take 15 hours per semester have a higher average GPA than all other students. In opposition, the null hypothesis states that there is no difference in the means of students who take 15 credit hours and those who take different amounts. We set our significance level at 5%, and calculated a test statistic of 2.788. From this, and again using Table 3 in Appendix 1, we find a p-value of 0.0026. Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis. This means there is statistically significant evidence that our alternative hypothesis is correct. It is worth noting that this does not mean that students who take 15 credit hours per semester have the highest GPAs of any other group of students because they have a higher GPA than all other students combined. As you can see in the confidence intervals and the graph of all of the groups, students who took 18 credit hours actually had the highest GPAs of any other group.
  24. The conclusions we drew from the data are that both holding a job and taking on different course loads are factors that will affect a student’s GPA. In both hypothesis tests, we found evidence to reject the null hypotheses of no difference between GPAs in favor of our original hypotheses that these factors made a difference. The confidence intervals for the differences in means shown here further support our ideas, as they do not include zero, and therefore support the likelihood of a difference existing.
  25. Over the course of our project, we used the textbook as a reference, and hosted our survey at surveymonkey.com