VVVIP Call Girls In Greater Kailash ➡️ Delhi ➡️ 9999965857 🚀 No Advance 24HRS...
Long-term Care Transitions in Dementia: Predictors and Caregiver Outcomes
1. ANALYSIS OF LONG-TERM CARE TRANSITIONS: EXAMPLES IN THE DEMENTIA CARE CONTEXT Joseph E. Gaugler, Ph.D. Associate Professor School of Nursing University of Minnesota
2.
3.
4. Longitudinal implications of informal long-term care Effectiveness of psychosocial interventions Social integration in residential long-term care OTHERS Dementia Demonstration Project (VA); Nursing Home Training to Impact CMS Indicators (NIA R42);The Memory Club (Alzheimer’s Association collaboration); Nursing Home Diversion Project (MN-BoA) NIA R01 AG022066 Comprehensive Support for AD CGs (2005-2010) NIA R21 AG026525 CG Outcomes Post NH Placement (2007-2009) NIA K02 ADS Use and Outcomes: MM (2008-2013) NINR R41 NR010642 Communication in the NH (2008; Co-PI) NIA R21 AG026525 CG Outcomes Post NH Placement (2007-2009)
7. Wethington. E. (2000). An overview of the life course perspective: Implications for health and nutrition. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 37, 115-120. (p. 116)
8.
9. NATURE OF TRANSITIONS TYPES Developmental Situational Health/Illness Organizational PATTERNS Single Multiple Sequential Simultaneous Related Unrelated PROPERTIES Awareness Engagement Change & difference Transition time span Critical points & events TRANSITION CONDITIONS: FACILITATORS AND INHIBITORS PERSONAL Meanings Cultural beliefs & attitudes Socioeconomic status Preparation & knowledge COMMUNITY SOCIETY PATTERNS OF RESPONSE PROCESS INDICATORS Feeling connected Interacting Location & being situated Developing confidence & coping OUTCOMES Mastery Fluid integrative identities NURSING THERAPEUTICS/INTERVENTION From Meleis, A.I., Sawyer, L.M., Im, E-O., Hilfinger Messias, D.K., & Schumacher, K. (2000). Experiencing transitions: An emerging middle-range theory. Advances in Nursing Science, 23, 12-28. (Figure 1)
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34. Figure 2. ROC curve for Zarit Burden Inventory at baseline (N = 5,831): “High” depression on GDS. NOTE: Area = .814 (SE = .006) Sensitivity = 77% (screen positive); Specificity = 71% (screen negative)