1. Social media
impact after publishing
D.Sc. Jari Jussila
Principal Research Scientist
@HamkSmart @HAMK_UAS
1
2. Personal experiences on
social media
• Active on social media since 2009
• Dissertation on social media 2015
• TUT Highest Social Authority Score 2016
• Editor Twitter viestintänä – Ilmiöt ja verkostot 2018
2
https://twitter.com/jjussila
@jjussila
@HamkSmart
@Moodmetric
@tviittikirja
@SomeTutkijalle
3. Unscientific formula for
science communication
3
Quality
of Publication
Availability
of Publication,
Research Data,
Source Code
x x
Visibility
of Publication,
Presentation,
Social Media
Posts, Web
page, Blogs,
Vlogs, etc.
= IMPACT
Time
Required
People
Involved
4. Digital Humanities professor
Terras on social media
12.10.2018 4
• Guess when I tweeted my
papers? Top ten
downloaded papers from my
department in the last year,
7 of which include me in the
author list.
• The papers that were
tweeted and blogged had at
least more than 11 times the
number of downloads than
their sibling paper which
was left to its own devices in
the institutional repository.
Source: http://melissaterras.blogspot.fi/2012/04/is-blogging-and-tweeting-about-research.html
6. Social media can help you achieve
a significant increase in visibility
and citations
6
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
5 7
16
20
67
Citations Cumulative
citations
7. Comparison of Cites/year to
TUT colleagues
7
Source: Publish or Perish. Available from https://harzing.com/resources/publish-
or-perish. Accessed 11.10.2018
Personal experience: the growth in number of citations is impacted by
social media
Professors
from same
Lab
Professor 1
Professor 2
Professor 3
Professor 4
8. Comparison of Cites/year to
tenure track candidates
8
Assistant
Professor
Tenure Track
Candidates
Professor 1
Professor 2
Professor 3
Professor 4
Candidate 2
Candidate 1
9. Index for ranking
achievement of researchers
• Hirsch found that the h-index is slightly more accurate than the
number of citations, and substantially better than the number of
publications (productivity) and mean number of citations.
• The h-index does seem to be able to identify good scientists, and it
is becoming widely used informally, for example to rank applicants
for research posts
• People in various disciplines are using or considering using the h-
index as one of the criteria both for appointments and for grants
allocation”, says Hirsch. “I have seen several job applicants send us
their h-index in their CV.”
• Schreiber agrees that “the use of the h-index is increasing, at least
unofficially.” Whether you like it or not, he says, “the h-index is here
to stay”.
9
Source: Ball 2007. Achievement index climbs the rank. Nature, Vol. 448, August 2007.
10. What to do? Some easy wins
• Creating profiles in social networks for
academics will increase your visibility,
citations and credibility as a scholar
• Sharing what you have done on social media,
will significantly increase visibility and
downloads of your articles, which lead to
more citations, collaboration, etc.
• Building your own scientific community will
multiply the above
10
11. Social networks for
academics
11
• A paper in a median impact factor journal uploaded to Academia.edu receives 16%
more citations after one year than a similar article not available online, 51%
more citations after three years, and 69% after five years.
• Articles posted to Academia.edu had 58% more citations than articles only posted
to other online venues, such as personal and departmental home pages, after five
years.
Source: Niyazov et al. 2016
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148257
12. Experiment – and see the
results
12
A tweet about a conference presentation one day before the conference
14. Blog post and Twitter share
experiment
14
100 downloads a month
Source: https://zenodo.org/record/1319706#.W7_JC1JoSu4
https://tutcris.tut.fi/portal/en/publications/the-reform-of-vocational-education-and-training-in-finland-
insights-from-twitter(9cefdf3b-8990-4f25-9a2c-ecab2254ea44).html
1 tweet 61 more views