This presentation formed part of the CPUT Teaching and Learning with Technology Day on 26 November 2020 and it is based on a book chapter currently in review, submitted to 'Co-teaching/researching in an Unequal World: Using Virtual Classrooms to Connect Africa, and Africa and the World’ Edited by Professors Shangase, Gachago and Ivala. This work forms part of collaborative research by 4 colleagues from Africa and Australia: Dr Mark Olweny from Uganda Martyrs University, Jolanda Morkel from the CPUT, Dr Lindy Osborne Burton from Queensland University of Technology and Mr Steven Feast from Curtin University. The context within which this reflective work is situated, is the architecture studio that is often associated with problems related to socialisation, asymmetrical power relations, the mental health of students caused by stress and workload, and a degree of ritualised teaching practices, and in online spaces specifically, aspects of social presence, authenticity, and embodiment. In our work we recognise differences and similarities in our contexts, that are visible in the composition of student bodies, staffing and resources, as well as the need to address social justice, and the call for decolonised curricula. Prior to the sudden global pivot to online learning in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and mandatory social distancing precautions, the four Schools of Architecture that form the focus of this chapter were open to adopt blended and online approaches to learning and teaching. The Professional Master's programme in Architecture at Curtin University is the first accredited fully online Master’s in Architecture in Australia and it is offered in collaboration with Open Universities Australia (OUA). The blended part-time Advanced Diploma in Architectural Technology programme at the CPUT is the result of a 6 year long University-Practice collaboration between the CPUT and Open Architecture. The resident programmes in architecture at the QUT employ digital technologies extensively, in custom-designed on-campus learning spaces. And the Master’s and Bachelor's programmes at UMU rely primarily on face-to-face on-campus (onground) teaching, complemented by virtual studio experiments. These four architectural learning sites are significant considering the general global resistance to online learning in architectural education, pre-pandemic. The online approaches adopted by these Schools of Architecture not only facilitated interaction and collaboration between students and educators, but also, in some cases, promoted inter-institutional collaboration. And these practices are the focus of this study. We employed a collaborative autoethnographic (CAE) approach to explore the potential for global collaboration in architectural education and to describe the approaches and strategies that can be considered.