The Contributions Of The Treaty Of Versailles

The Contributions Of The Treaty Of Versailles
Treaty of Versailles
On June 28, 1919 the Treaty of Versailles was signed by Germany and the Allied Powers which
officially ended world war 1 (Treaty of Versailles. 2009) The treaty was brought up by the four–
major people who devoted to the treaty which were known as the "Big Four–David Lloyd George of
Britain, Georges Clemenceau of France, Woodrow Wilson of the United States, and Vittorio Orlando
of Italy". (Treaty of Versailles n/d) David Lloyd George, Georges Clemenceau, and Woodrow
Wilson cooperated more into shaping this treaty than the other members of the Allied Powers. The
treaty was created with fifteen parts and 440 articles, Part I created the Covenant of the New League
of Nations, which Germany was not able to join, Part II specified Germany's new boundaries,
(Treaty of Versailles 2009) Finally Part III created a demilitarized zone and separated Saar land from
Germany for fifteen years. (Treaty of Versailles 2009) The Belgians and the French tried to carry out
the treaty, which led to their occupation of the Ruhr In 1922, however, Anglo–American financial
pressure compelled France to scale down its goals and end the occupation .under the Dawes Plan
and the Young Plan in 1924–1929 Germany agreed to pay reparations , but the preparations were
cancelled due to the depression in 1932 ( Treaty of Versailles. 2009). Germany violated many
disarmament provisions of Part V of the treaty during the 1920s, as a matter of fact, Hitler
denounced the treaty in 1935 he
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Comparison Of Queen Elizabeth And Winston Churchill's Speech
Queen Elizabeth wrote an inspiring speech to the Troops who fought for the Armada about their
honor and power over this astonishing war. Alongside, Winston Churchill delivered a majestical yet
powerful speech about the issue dealing with battle of Britain and the unifications needing to be
healed. Queen Elizabeth and Winston Churchill both delivered exhilarating speeches to their troops
and counties with the battle of Britain. The Queen delivers her speech to the courageous group of
men and women who fought this rigid, enduring war. While Winston delivers his speech to the
House of Commons. While analyzing and juxtaposing these two speeches and their contrastive
audiences; it is very mere to see the compelling diction, dynamic emotion used in their speeches.
Queen Elizabeth uses the woman like senses in her to make her speech to be emotional yet uplifting.
In regards she uses the phrase, "I know I have the body but of a weak and feeble woman". She
ultimately uses this parlance to employ her bodyful actions, to use this as a defense yet comfort to
these valiant,assiduous soldiers. Elizabeth uses her gender to scheme her words to her spectators;
women are known for their poignant side therefore she displays this to the audience with her
declamations. Many women use their women instincts in their times of endearment, Jk Rowling
gave a speech in 2008 and used the phrase," We do not need magic to change the world, we carry all
the power we need inside ourselves already". Jk

Abolishing Slavery Dbq
Slavery was one of the most horrific acts ever instilled on a race of people in world's history. The
history paints a truly horrific picture when blacks were stolen from their homelands, taken away
from their families, enslaved and suffered from harsh punishments. The first opposition of practicing
slavery in antebellum America takes its origins from the beginning of nineteenth century. The most
recognizable abolitionists such as William Lloyd Garrison, George Thompson, David Walker and
Frederic Douglass were the first who unfolded the antislavery debates in transnational ways. Their
persistent eagerness and appeal to public opinion helped to sow seeds of abolishing slavery in
America.
The first attempt to deploy abolitionist movement

Is Lloyd George the Founding Father of Welfare State?
"Lloyd George real founding father Welfare State?" Introduction Many have said over the years that
Lloyd George was 'the most famous Welshman ever born in Manchester', on the other hand it was
David Lloyd George's Welshness that got his career going in a direction geared toward politics and
Social welfare. George before his career in welfare was known to be very established as one of the
most influential British politicians of the modern period, second only maybe to Winston Churchill.
During the course of the 1920s Lloyd George sort of kept his head in the politics arena for a while.
Next he got involved with the Liberal welfare reforms (1906 1914 (Fair, 2204) were acts of social
lawmaking had been passed by the British Liberal Party somewhere after the 1906 General Election.
Many experts have been arguing the point in regards to legislation and how is displays the
emergence of the modern welfare state in the United Kingdom (Creiger, 2006). Eventually, they
removed their viewpoint from a laissez–faire organization to a more communist method (Jones,
2001). The improvements prove the split that had arose inside liberalism, amid contemporary
liberalism and classical liberalism, and then a change in course for the Liberal Party from liberalism,
in overall, to a gathering of modern liberalism and superior, livelier government. Social Reform It
can be contended that Lloyd George was clearly responsible for the welfare system. Lloyd George
made a huge influence to the

Decline Of The Liberal Party Essay
The decline of the Liberal party and the subsequent rise of Labour was caused by a variety of
intertwining factors. The Liberal Party to some extent played a part in its own downfall but this
essay seeks to explore this and other factors, such as the role of the First World War and the electoral
system, in the decline of the Liberal Party and how they aided the rise of Labour. In my opinion, the
First World War is the over– arching event, that set the decline of the Liberal Party in motion. When
the Liberal Party won the 1910 election it did not know that it would become the party to lead
Britain in the war when it started in 1914. 'For a party wedded to international conciliation, personal
liberty, free trade, social reform, and voluntary ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, they did not really have a choice because not only was joining the war was the popular
sentiment, but Great Britain also had a commitment to ensure Belgium's neutrality by the Treaty of
London which had been violated by the Germans. However, the Liberal Party was very reluctantly
committed and Asquith was not a war leader. He was indecisive and failures very early on in the war
forced him to form a coalition government in order to prevent attacks from the Conservatives and
the media. 'War brought about the need to take state action which trampled individual liberties
deemed important to Liberal ideology' (Black,2000:186) and David Lloyd George rose as a key
figure in the liberal Party willing to trample these liberties for the good of the country, and arguably
for his political career, but to the detriment of the Liberal Party. He wanted to mobilise all resources
for war and he was an advocate of conscription which most Liberals were very strongly opposed to
as it was "seen as opposed to the Liberal tradition of civil liberty" (Black,2000: 184) and this
effectively put him and his supporters on the side of the Conservatives and opposite to Asquith. This
internal conflict eventually led to the split of the

The Liberal Election Victory of 1906 Essay
The Liberal Election Victory of 1906 The Liberals won a 'landslide' election victory in 1906. It is
claimed that the loss of power for the Conservatives was largely due to a decline in fortunes as the
party split due to issues over tariff reforms. On the other hand it is assumed that the loss was due to
the complacency and the neglect of Workingmen's Interests. Arthur James Balfour had become the
Conservative leader in the House of Commons and served (1891–92, 1895–1903) as the first Lord
of the treasury. He had succeeded his uncle as Prime minister in 1902. A huge task lay ahead of
Balfour, as poverty was to be a focal point at the beginning of the 20th century. Although it is
reputed that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The South African wars (1899–1902) resulted in a review made into the armed forced due to its poor
showing. Many men (of poor background) lost their lives, which in turn voiced concerns throughout
the country. This obviously reflected poorly on the government and produced a psychological shock
also as Chamberlain lost to the radical cause by his espousal of Imperialism, which proved to be a
double disaster for the Tories as it tied in with the Boer War. This allowed room for the Liberals to
capitalise on this advantage and to begin snatching the working class vote from the Conservatives
and people like Lloyd George enabled them to do so. He was a great orator and along with Churchill
they relentlessly tortured the Tory's throughout the campaign, attacking them as enemies of the
people. They carried this out effectively as they produced campaigns, slogans and songs, which
were widely accepted. The prevailing atmosphere of the Boer war made sure that Conservative
credibility was undermined when the 'Chinese slavery' affair was publicised. The public seemed to
be impressed by this issue. Political insensitivity of Balfour's government was indicated as

The Causes Of The Treaty Of Versailles
Introduction On June 28, 1919 the Treaty of Versailles was signed, ceasing World War I. The treaty
left Germany to blame of everything that happened due to the war. Almost no opinion from the
Germans was put in the treaty, therefore it was mostly written by the Allied powers. The Treaty of
Versailles was an attempt of peace, or compromise after the conflict of World War I. It was a fight to
decide what the treaty would consist of and it would be the cause of a new conflict, World War II. In
this case instead of a compromise resolving the conflict, it causes the conflict.
France's economic situation was crushed. A large amount of money was spent to get medical care
for the many wounded people. France's sudden loss of manpower for production and weak
agriculture added to the failure in economy.
So much of the property damage was lost that it cannot be calculated or estimated. Much of the war
was fought in France, so many houses and villages were destroyed. The war destroyed wine
orchards and agricultural areas. Many discarded shells were left on the ground, which stopped use of
the land until it was cleaned up.
French lost about 1,697,800 people and fell behind Germany and England in population. It was truly
devastating because nearly every family lost at least one family member. Around 700 people were
disabled. Children's parents died and eventually there were many orphans.
Great Britain lost around 750,000 soldiers and 1,500,000 were wounded. Nearly 2 million

What Is The Effectiveness Of The Suffragist?
Literature Review
Source 1
This Source is an extract from a book written by J Marlow. Marlow argues that the Suffragists were
far more effective that the Suffragettes.
The Suffragists used negotiating tactics and had a working relationship with the Labour party.
Millicent Fawcett (Leader of the NUWSS) had a close and working relationship with many
members of parliament, notably Lloyd Goerge (member of parliament from 1890 and Prime
Minister from 1916–1922).
The NUWWS Suffragists outnumbered the Suffragettes by a large amount and it was the Suffragists
that successfully lobbied for the Representation of People Act 1918.
Source 2
In this article, Trueman argues that the Suffragettes and the Suffragists complemented each other,
that the women's role in the war effort had no effect on the success of the1918 Representation of
People Act and that this act was an injustice to the fight of the Suffraggettes and Suffragists. ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This highlights the fact that the Suffragists had male supporters as well as female.
Source 7
This source is a letter from Millicent Fawcett to David Lloyd George in reply to another letter from
David Lloyd George. In the original letter Lloyd George expresses concerns that the Militant
Suffragette Movement is damaging the cause and is strengthening the Anti–Suffragist's argument.
In Fawcett's reply, she describes how she does not agree nor support the militant actions of the
Suffragettes and blatantly challenges their methods. She emphasizes that the Suffragist movement
has openly spoken out and protested against the militant Suffragettes.
Fawcett speaks about specific violent actions and encourages Lloyd George to not give up on the
Suffragist movement because of these violent acts. She signs the letter with, "Yours Faithfully". This
indicates Fawcett's support of Lloyd George and thus her support against the

World War 1 Peace Conference
Modern History Account for the different goals of the Big Three Allied leaders at the Paris Peace
Conference The Paris Peace Conference took place in 1919 to set the peace terms for the defeated
Central powers. Three men took charge called 'The Big Three' and they were President Woodrow
Wilson of the United States, Prime Minister David Lloyd George of Great Britain and George
Clemenceau of France. The Conference was initially planned as a pre–meeting to set the terms of
what they were going to ask from Germany, but the pre–meeting quickly became the meeting where
the decisions were made because they each had different ideas about what the terms of the treaty
should be. "The Big Three" During the Paris peace conference ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Poland to become an independent State with access to the sea – An independent Polish state should
arise which should include the territories inhabited by indisputably Polish population, which should
be assured a free and secure access to the sea 14. League of Nations to be set up – a general
association of nations to be formed up for the purpose of affording mutual guarantees of political
independence to small states Many people in Britain and France disagreed with his fourteen point
plan. Wilson also created the League of Nations which was an intergovernmental organization. It
was an organization whose principal mission was to maintain world peace and that war never broke
out again. Wilson demanded a fair treaty that created a League of Nations and allowed for self–
determination of all minor states. Treaty of Versailles The meeting of the Treaty of Versailles The
Treaty of Versailles was one of the peace treaties at the end of World War 1. It took 6 months of
negotiations at the Paris Peace Conference to conclude the peace Treaty which Germany had to
accept or they will be invaded by the allies. Germany had to: * Return Alsace–Lorraine to France *
Give Eupen and Malmedy to Belgium * Give up Sheleswig to Denmark * Give Danzig up to make
it a free international city * Give West

Woodrow Wilson Contributions
Woodrow Wilson (1856–1924) was elected President on the basis of domestic issues in 1912, and
re–elected in 1916. He based his 1916 re–election campaign around the slogan "he kept us out of
war", and had worked hard to broker a compromise peace. In early 1917 Berlin decided to launch
all–out submarine warfare designed to sink American ships bringing supplies to Britain; in the
Zimmermann Telegram it proposed a military alliance with Mexico to fight a war against the US.
The nation was poorly armed when it went to war in April 1917, but it had millions of potential
fresh soldiers, billions of dollars, and huge supplies of raw materials needed by the Allies. Officially
Wilson kept the US independent of the Allies. In 1918 Wilson took personal control of negotiations
with Germany, including the armistice. He issued his Fourteen Points, his view of a post–war world
that could avoid another terrible conflict. It had an enormous impact on both sides in Europe, and
made him the man of the hour in Paris. A leader of the Progressive Movement, he assembled a high–
powered group of academic advisors to help him in Paris but his distrustful personality led him to
break with a series of close advisors, most notably Colonel House. He made a major blunder by
refusing to bring along any prominent Republicans to Paris, which politicised the American debate
and weakened his support. His main goal was a long–term solution to end warfare based on the
League of Nations and self–determination of

We Shall Fight On The Beaches
In Winston Churchill's speech, 'We Shall Fight On the Beaches' he presents a powerful call to action
directly to the British House of Commons in the year of 1940 on the forth of June. Winston uses the
techniques of figurative language to capture his audience's attention in a way they could understand
the importance of his message, without disregarding his high level of intellect. In order for one to
truly understand Churchill's message one must understand the difficult task he was coined with prior
to delivering this powerful message. Through the use of logos Winston provides us with the
necessary background information to inform the listeners that prior to delivering the speech the
British military suffered a great loss in both France and Belgium. In great detail he speaks on the
events that have occurred leading up to him speaking, giving both us now and the then listener a
better understanding of what he stands for and is fighting for. His use of logos makes the speech
more reliable and comforts the audience because it informs them that Churchill knows what he is
talking about. In his speech he announced to the public that he knew it was going to be hard to
announce and speak on the greatest military disaster in the history of Britain. His ability to be
sensitive and honest in his challenges creates a powerful bond between his message and the
audience. His use of rhetoric helped bring about a final victory after all the disasters caused by the
Nazis. Churchill knew

Explain How The United States Should Reflect The Domestic...
Answer this question from the perspective of Britain, France, and the United States and within the
context of the early 1930s. How do you think each country would react to the situation in Germany
as described by Rumbold and Messersmith? Your response should reflect the domestic context of
each country in the early 1930s. The U.K, France, and the U.S would have reacted similarly to the
situation in Germany during the 1930s given the situation at the time. The United States during the
1930s suffered greatly due to the Great Depression caused by Black Tuesday, crash of the stock
market. There was mass unemployment and uncertainty. To make matter worse, Herbert Hoover, the
president at the time, did little to help the American public. Hoover argued that market would fix
itself and that the government should not interfere in order to help the public. As a result, the U.S
pursued a policy of isolationism in order to focus on the situation within the country instead of
worry about the rise of Adolf Hitler in Nazi Germany. Both the French and the British had their
suspicion that Nazi Germany would be a troublesome state. However, the situation warranted that
they appease to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As previously stated, the situation in Europe was poor. The Great Depression in the U.S affected the
British economy. Unemployment and stagnant economic growth made the public reluctant to add
Germany into the list of problem that Britain had to face. In addition, pro nazi sentiment in Britain
was active. The Daily Mail and former prime minister David Lloyd George expressed friendly
sentiment towards the Nazis. Furthermore, Neville Chamberlain expressed that he could secure
peace between the two nations by appeasing to Hitler. Chamberlain argued that Hitler only wanted
the German people living in Czechoslovakia, not conquest. By doing that Chamberlain believed he
secured "peace for our

Who's To Blame For World War I?
The Treaty of Versailles was a peace agreement made by the world powers that won World War I.
Signed in Versailles Palace on June 28th 1919, the creation of treaty was governed by the winning
side's most prominent political figures. These were Woodrow Wilson, the United States president,
Georges Clemenceau of France, and David LLoyd George of England. The varying opinions and
motives of these three individuals led to great discussion and compromises altering the outcome,
results, and Germany's response to the official document. Despite this, Germany was undoubtedly
blamed for the start of World War I.
However, the diverse goals of the three political leaders varied on how much punishment they felt
Germany deserved. Europe was truly devastated ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The League of Nations was given possession to Germany's overseas colonies. Germany was forced
to return Russian land seized in the Treaty of Brest–Litovsk. Germany's army was no longer allowed
to enlarge greater than 100,000 people. Germany was prohibited from joining with Austria.
Economically, Germany was destroyed by the Allies. Mortifyingly, Germany had to "admit full
responsibility for starting the war" (History Learning Site). As mentioned before, an ineffective
League of Nations was also put into place by the Treaty of

How Children 's Services Have Evolved Into Their Current Form
This essay will show how and why children's services have evolved into their current form in the
UK. It will explore children's services from the 19th to the 21st century and show how they have
changed and developed. This essay will look at the welfare state in relation to the Beveridge report,
the creation of the NHS and other children's services, political ideologies and policies and
legislation. It will conclude with modern day future challenges of children's services including the
five social evils. Children's services support and protect vulnerable children, young people, their
families and carers. (nhs.co.uk) According to Malcolm Hill (2012), "if as societies are to achieve the
best for all children and particularly who are in need, it will require providing them with the best
possible services." During the reign of Queen Victoria from 1837 to 1901, there was great wealth
and also great poverty. Most middle class children worked in factories and mills; factory owners
employed children as they didn't complain and were also cheap to pay. During Victorian Britain,
there were no laws to protect children from work. Lord Shaftesbury argued in parliament for laws to
be changed; inspectors went into factories to find out what they were really like, this resulted in
three laws to be passed. These were 1841 Mines Act, 1847 Ten Hour Act and 1874 Factory Act. By
1874 no child under ten would be employed in factories. (www.bbc.co.uk) In 1870, the government
passed a law, drafted

The End Of The War
In Autumn of 1918 it all started, desertion rates were dramatically rising in the German army, civil
strikes reduced German war, protection, this was the beginning of the end of the war. While the
German army was slowly collapsing the Americans found their perfect chance to vitally strike the
German army. The Americans then launched the essential Hundred Day Offensive which was the
concluding offensive period of the war. The Hundred Day Offense that vitally pushed Germany out
of France, therefore, forcing them to retreat beyond the Hindenburg Line. The "Hindenburg Line"
was the allied term for the German Siegfriedstellung that was built during the winter of 1916 – 1917
and was a German defense position on the eastern front. Once the Germans retreated to the
Hindenburg line the Americans carried out a 56–hour bombardment followed by the breach of the
almost defunct Hindenburg Line. This war the end of war? After all of this, one of the most
important and grueling treaty with Germany was signed.
After war soon came bargaining of a treaty meant to end all wars. The bargaining started early
1919's and was completed in April. The treaty of Versailles was divided into 15 sections including
the covenant League of Nations being one of the most important and controversial sections of the
treaty. Approximately a month after bargaining was over the Treaty of Versailles was presented to
Germany for "consideration". Germany was given 3 weeks to accept. If not accepted war

Treaty Of Versailles: Engineered To End Conflict Between...
Considering the Treaty of Versailles was engineered to end conflict between countries, why did it
result in more conflict, and what does this say about our behaviour as humans?
The Treaty of Versailles – a peace agreement established between the Allied and the Central Powers
of the First World War, signed in 1919 – resulted in many changes for millions of people. It was
originally created to end conflict between battling countries, with severe penalties enforced on the
country of Germany, for all that they had done. From the signing of this Treaty, only came more
bloodshed, and a taste for vengeance that ostensibly needed to be fulfilled. The Treaty of Versailles
was a document engineered specifically to stop widespread hostility and armed ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The attitudes of key players of the WW1, including British politician David Lloyd George,
American president Woodrow Wilson and French statesmen Georges Clemenceau towards 'making
Germany pay' differed immensely. Before the signing of the Treaty, there were months of
argument/negotiation as to what the treaty should include. Georges Clemenceau had one very simple
belief; Germany should be 'brought to its knees, so that she could never start a war again'. This
mirrored the views of the French public, and was also what Clemenceau himself believed. American
president Woodrow Wilson believed instead that while Germany should be punished, it should be in
a way that would lead to European reconciliation; as opposed to revenge. This was because he was
so genuinely shocked and devastated by the horror of the war. David Lloyd George wanted to reduce
the implications of the treaty so as to maintain the long–standing trade relationship between
Germany and Britain, but could not convince Clemenceau of this. Because the public of Britain also
wanted to crush Germany, Lloyd–George was eventually swayed into siding with Clemenceau, so as
to maintain his presidency. Each of these players had their own agendas and reasons for what they
believed, but in the end, the majority ruled, and the country of Germany was reduced to

The Treaty Of Versailles And Its Effect On The World War I
The Treaty of Versailles
The Treaty of Versailles was a treaty signed between Germany and the Allies which consisted of
Britain, France and America. The idea of the Treaty was to end World War one and Germany would
be too weak to start another war. This meant that there would be peace throughout Europe for a long
time but it was controversial at best. It was signed in the Versailles palace which was large enough
for hundreds of people to be involved in the signing on 28th of June 1919. Germany had almost no
say in what was put into the treaty but they had no choice but to sign it otherwise they would be
invaded by the Allies. "Its 15 parts and 440 articles reassigned German boundaries and assigned
liability for reparations" ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Along with the reduction of men, "Germany was not allowed tanks, submarines or military aircraft
and the navy could only have six battleships" (Mr Hinds' History; what were the main Terms of the
Versailles Treaty 2016). This was created so that Germany would not have the force to declare war
but still had the power to stop communism from getting into Western Europe. Another aspect to the
Treaty of Versailles were the economic terms. These terms stated that Germany had to pay 6.6
billion dollars back to the allies. Germany was not able to pay this amount of money so they had to
borrow money from nearby countries. This meant that Germany fell into huge amounts of debt and
lost their title for second most economically advanced country in the world.
There were two more important Terms for The Treaty of Versailles, they were the General terms and
the territorial terms. There were three important general clauses to the treaty. The first was that
Germany had to take all responsibility for the war, this was called the War Guilt Clause and it was
the term that Germany was the most upset about. The second was that Germany had to pay for all
war damages which was mostly to France and Belgium. The third was that a League of Nations was
set up to keep world peace and Germany was not allowed to join. There were also the territorial
terms of the treaty where Germany had to give up

World War 1 Effects Essay
World War I, which was initiated by the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, lasted from
1914 until 1918. It was fought on 3 different continents which include Europe, Asia, and Africa.
Even countries that were not directly involved were still negatively impacted by the effects of the
war. World leaders gathered in Paris to end the war by creating the Treaty of Versailles. While the
treaty was intended to keep the peace after World War I, it contributed to the onset of World War II
by infuriating the Germans with its harsh terms, the leaders of the Conference of Versailles all
having different goals, and the failure of the US to ratify the treaty.
Paragraph 2:
In January of 1919 there was a conference held in Paris at the Palace ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Every country wanted something different out of the treaty. Lasting peace was the one thing that
could not be accomplished ultimately due to the treatment of Germany. The Treaty of Versailles
called for Germany to take blame for starting the war (known as the War Guilt Clause), to pay the
huge reparations regarding to the war, to not have a regular army, to lose land that would be
redistributed to other countries, them and their delegates were humiliated by being forced to sign the
treaty at a ceremony, and they were not invited to join the League of Nations. Germany was not
allowed to rebuild their army and was limited to 100,00 men. The treaty disarmed Germany for
good. They were the only nation disarmed and restricted like this. Germany's foreign colonies were
also split up to be ruled under the name of the League of Nations. Having to pay for the reparations
caused an economic collapse in Germany after signing the Treaty of Versailles. This led to the
people of Germany to become vulnerable and fed to the rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party. Italy
also faced the hardships of an economic collapse and political turmoil, leading to a dictator, Benito
Mussolini, to come to power; fueling the rise of communist dictators in Russia. However, the treaty
also identified the creation of new countries in Europe, following the principle of ethnic

The Big Four : And Others Of The Peace Conference
The Big Four: And Others of the Peace Conference, by Robert Lansing offers a firsthand perspective
on what occurred during the Peace talks following the First World War. Robert Lansing primarily
concentrates on the four biggest players during the Peace talks, Georges Clemenceau, Woodrow
Wilson, David Lloyd George, and Vittorio E. Orlando. Lansing's report of these four men
compromised three fourths of the entire book, leaving the rest of the book to the representatives of
other States, such as Eleftherios Venizelos, Emir Feisul, Louis Botha, and Ignace Jan Paderewski.
One of the most significant features of this book is that it offers a different perspective of the Peace
talks because it is a look at how people viewed these Statesmen and their actions at that time.
Lansing's goal was to "treat the subject impersonally and to avoid the petty influences which ought
not to, but so often do, warp individual opinion and a just appraisement of public men." In doing so
Lansing would theoretically offer an impartial view of these characters. His arguments about each of
the people represented in the book are all different and each of Lansing's views has a distinct theme
and purpose; with each person having recognizable strengths and personality traits that Lansing
identifies. So a formal assessment of the book would require me to provide an assessment on each of
the sections of the men represented in the book. The first section of the book discusses the
characteristics and

Role Of Emmeline Pankhurst Movement
Suffragette movement –
To what extent did Emmeline Pankhurst actions influence the 1918 general election?
The question I have chosen is To what extent did the actions of Emmeline Pankhurst influence the
outcome of the 1918 British General election. Slide
To begin Who was Emmeline Pankhurst? She was an avid supporter of the women's rights
movement. Her husband who was a leading barrister was too a supporter of this movement. After
her husband's death she started the Women's Franchise league in 1898. She then formed the
Women's Social and Political Union, which took part in much more political actions then her
original franchise. Through this political movement a group of women, led by Emmeline, known as
the Suffragettes formed. Slide
The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Slide They partook in lighting buildings on fire including some churches belonging to the church of
england as they did not think women should vote, the smashed shop windows, turned violent
towards police officers and tied themselves to the front gates of Buckingham Palace as the royal
family also did not think women should gain the right to vote. Slide
Their actions led to them being taken to prison but they did not care. They would undertake hunger
strikes during their imprisonment which led to uproar in the public eye especially as officers were
force feeding the women. Slide
David Lloyd George who was the leader of the Coalition at the time and was a supporter of the
women's right to vote movement, also had part of his house burnt down by Suffragettes as they
believed he was not doing anything to help their cause. Slide
Their most drastic action was possibly when fellow Suffragette Emily Davison threw herself under
the King's horse on Derby day. She became the first Martyr for the Suffragette movement. Slide
Their political action ended in 1914 at the start of WWI. Their leader instructed them to help the
Government in any way that they needed whilst men were away fighting. A shortage in men left
gaps within the workforce which were soon occupied by women undertaking typically male jobs
including industry work. This lapse in political action by the Suffragettes was one of the main
reasons

The Effect of World War One on People at Home Essay
The Effect of World War One on People at Home The people at home lives were affected in a wide
variety of ways during the First World War. Some people's lives were altered for the good, where as
some were altered for the bad. During the First World War, a lot of people were needed in the army.
This meant that volunteers were required by their many hundreds. To influence this, propaganda was
used in the forms of pamphlets, posters, newspapers and by word of mouth. The source A1 (i) was a
poster used for propaganda to make men volunteer for the army. About 54 million similar posters
were created, but this was one of the most famous. It shows Lord Kitchener, who was an upper class
member of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The volunteering system was not only very inefficient; it was also not a very fair system because
you were not forced to join up. So in 1916 the government decided to introduce conscription. A
typical government conscription poster is shown in source A4. It states that unmarried men must
sign up to the army. Any man who wished not to join up was labelled a conchie, or a conscientious
objector. Many of these people had religious beliefs which stated that "thou shall not kill" and so
they did not believe in war and killing people. These people helped out other ways. Others thought
that the war was only being fought for the Capitalists. These people usually the communists, or the
"comrades", or the socialists. Source A5 was written by a conscientious objector who managed to
escape from prison in 1916. He says that people should support the troops, if not in person, then in
spirits. This man was an absolutist who did not agree to war neither did he want anything to do with
it. The government frowned upon these people and threw them into prison because they were scared
of the working class uprising. While the government were dealing with recruiting men, they were
also being embarrassed by the shortages of munitions. The newspapers soon let the people know
about this scandal, which is a rare example of anti–government stories. In source B2 we are shown
Lloyd George "delivering the goods"

Treasury and Liberals Social Poilicies
"Many senior officials at the Treasury regarded the rising defence estimates and the Liberals' social
policies as dangerous because they required a constantly rising level of expenditure." It soon became
clear, however, that such approach was not appropriate. The outcome of the war became fully
dependent on state action and not merely on the economy. It was of a crucial importance for the
Cabinet to step in, allocate manpower, and organize the industry so as to avoid an inefficient use of
resources (capital and people). Hence, Lloyd George stepped in and decided to initiate
Reconstruction by restructuring the Cabinet and introducing various Committees, Ministries, and
Commissions which were to assume extended powers and responsibilities within the private sphere
of civil activities. It was, however, unclear whether this change in faith would pertain over the post–
war period as well.
Furthermore, the aftermath of the war was not a pleasant sight for any politician taking office at the
time. The situation awaiting Lloyd George, who had already been assuming the role of a Prime
Minister during the war, had been even more damaging partially due to his party's increasingly
severe internal struggles which began with the social reforms of 1906. Even before the climax of the
war, it became apparent that the Liberal Party was most likely unable to restore its significance or
even secure its survival in the post–war government. Liberals led by Lloyd George became
increasingly

Liberal Election Victory Of 1906 Essay
The Reasons for the Liberal Election Victory of 1906
The Liberal election victory of 1906 was due to key issues that the Liberals manipulated to their
favour whereas the exhausted Conservatives barely defended their actions. This election victory was
on the back of Unionist dominance that had spanned a decade driven by three key issues: "the
crown, the church and the constitution." After the Second Boer War in South Africa, everything
began to go wrong for the Unionists who then found their own leader, Balfour, losing his seat in his
own constituency of Blackpool.
The key areas of victory are the Tory blunders and the Liberal successes. The decline of the
Unionists seemed to begin after the 1900 ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The public would now see the Unionist government as not being able to cope with the situation in
South Africa and therefore they would think that they wouldn't be able to cope with the situation at
home.
Combined with this was the strength of the Liberal party. In these 'difficult' times, the Liberals
readily attacked the Unionists and it appeared to the British public that they had the moral high
ground. It was Campbell Bannerman and Lloyd George especially who attacked the Unionists on
every issue that they were weak on and the Boer War was a good example of this. They were
excellent campaigners and orators. Lloyd George, as it can be seen on the video, was good at
rallying crowds and was good at gaining supports in key areas such as Lincolnshire and London,
where their votes increased dramatically up to 15%. The Liberals were very well organized. Instead
of trying to get a huge majority in already Liberal strongholds they expanded out to areas where
they were weaker. The British public would be able to see the strength of the Liberal candidates
compared to the lackluster Unionist candidates and this would perhaps persuade them to vote for the
Liberals ahead of the Unionists. This upped their overall average and this was therefore a major
factor for their victory.
Another key area where the Tories were weak was the economy.

Treaty Of Versailles Unfair
World War 1 ended when Germany officially surrendered on November 11, 1918. All nations agreed
to stop fighting but the war was not formally over. The peace treaties of 1919–1923 focused mostly
on officially ending World War 1. In this essay, we will focus on the treaty of Versailles.
The peace treaties of 1919–1923 were unfair, especially the treaty of Versailles. This happened
because it angered the Germans. The following reasons why it angered the Germans is that it felt
unfair. They hated clause 231, which blamed them for full responsibility of the war, even though the
allies also caused the war. Austria–Hungary declared war on Serbia, and Serbia was allies with
France and Russia. Germany lost one tenth of their land, which was important

Honor in No One Writes to the Colonel and Chronicle of a...
Honor in No One Writes to the Colonel and Chronicle of a Death Foretold by Garcia–Marquez
Every culture in the world has its own unique set of values that they adhere to in life. The most
important value to people is their honor. Honor is a very important factor in a person life that they
will stop at nothing to make sure it is not lost. This endless pursuit of keeping honor can causes both
positive and negative effects to a society. The reason honor is a main driving force in a person's life
is for the simple fact that it determines how the society views that person's integrity, honesty and
truthfulness to himself and family.
In the two novellas No One Writes to the Colonel and Chronicle of a Death Foretold, Garcia–
Marquez ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Colonel and his wife consequently starve in order to maintain the honor given by the rooster.
They conceal this humiliation of poverty by giving a false illusion of who they are to their
neighbors. The Colonel believes that starvation is necessary as long as they are honorable to the
liberal party and their son. The wife of the Colonel states "I [place] stones on to boil so the
neighbors wouldn't know that we often go with out food for days"(159). The Colonel's wife feels
humiliated that they have to live in poverty to maintain honor. In a moment of doubt the Colonel's
wife states to the Colonel "you can't eat dignity"(160). Then the author uses a brief interruption in
the setting to show incorrectness in the wife's comment. Garcia uses the interruption of lighting to
show that what the wife said was wrong and that lying and maintaining their honor is the most
important thing to do.
This same idea that maintaining honor can cause a person to live a life of lies is seen in the novella
Chronicle of a Death Foretold. The whole town covers up and lies about being involved and having
any information about Santiago Nasar's death. They do this because they want to honor the Vicario
family by making the murder look justifiable and a strict matter of family honor. The narrator states
that, "affairs of honor are sacred monopolies, giving access only to those who are part of it

The First World War ( Wwi )
Along history there have been persuasive speakers who through their voices have changed the
world. They have mastered the art of persuasion and became leaders in order to inspire people to
follow them and believe in them, to fight for their country because of patriotism and honor, and they
unite masses for the best for the humanity and others for the worse. The First World War (WWI) left
leaders that implementing strategic messages dedicated to the people made a paradigm shift by that
time causing a revolutionary change and "a tragic and unnecessary conflict," as Keegan describes
the Great War. Leaders in WWI such as David Lloyd George, the Liberal chancellor of British,
Thomas Woodrow Wilson, 28th President of the United States, and later Adoft Hitler during WWII,
are remembered for their persuasive approaches.
By definition, a persuasive speech is "a message strategically designed to induce change in the
audience in some way consistent with the speaker's purpose" (Pearson 330). Mrs. Price explains
how Aristotle defined three kinds of persuasion furnished: "The first kind, ethos, depends on the
personal character of the speaker; the second, pathos, on appealing to the emotions, values, and
beliefs of the audience, and third, logos, on the proof or logic." Many leaders have mastered the
three types before mentioned and demonstrated that it is an invaluable tool that can change the
world.
World War I began on 28 July 1914 with Austria–Hungary 's declaration of war with

World War I: The Big Three at the Center of the Peace...
Following the First World War, commonly referred to as the 'War to end all wars' due to its severity
and the damage it had caused, a peace needed to be drawn between the nations involved to settle the
punishments for the nations who lost and also a plan to ensure that something like this would never
occur again. This peace conference is the center of much debate amongst historians with two
dominant views, one being that the victory nations acted out of revenge towards the losing nations
and laid the seeds for not only World War Two but future conflicts and the other view that the
victory nations acted out of necessity
The 'the Big Three' at the center of the peace settlement of Versailles David Lloyd George, Woodrow
Wilson and Georges Clemenceau, are often given full responsibility by many for not only the
Second World War but also the many crises that followed throughout the 20th century. One well–
known historian in support of this view is David Andelmen, which is displayed in the following
statement "The peace imposed at Versailles by the western powers –Britain, France, Italy and the
United States – On the vanquished, not to mention the weak, the powerless, the orphaned and the
friendless, determined much of what went wrong for the balance of the century and beyond." These
three men according to Andelmen were the soul reason for many of the events and crises following
the Versailles peace conference, as they were prominently focused on their own interests and

The End Of The War
In autumn of 1918, it all started. Desertion rates were dramatically rising in the German army, and
civil strikes reduced protection of German cities. This was the beginning of the end of the war.
While the German army was slowly collapsing, the Americans found the perfect chance to strike the
German army. The Americans then launched the important Hundred Day Offense which was the
concluding offensive of the war. The Hundred Day Offense pushed Germany out of France,
therefore, forcing them to retreat beyond the Hindenburg Line where they landed their final attack of
this war. The Hindenburg Line was built during the winter of 1916 as an important German defense
position on the eastern front. Once the Germans retreated to the Hindenburg ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Approximately a month after bargaining was over, the Treaty of Versailles was presented to
Germany for "consideration."
Germany was given 3 weeks to accept the terms. If it was not accepted, continuation of the war
would be inevitable. The Treaty of Versailles is widely known for its essentials to end the war, but it
inflicted harsh terms on the Germans as well. Germany was forced to give up 13.5% of its 1914
territory (including land taken from Russia in the Treaty of Brest–Litovsk and a lot of vital industrial
territory), its army was limited to 100,000 men, German use of heavy artillery, gas, tanks, and
aircraft was banned, Germany 's navy was restricted to shipping under 10,000 tons, Germans weren
't allowed to use submarines, and Germany was forced to pay $55 billion in reparations. The $55
billion the Germans needed to pay was one of the harshest term of the treaty. After the Germans
gave up this money, unemployment struck and Germany slowly collapsed as a whole, and the
German people accepted Hitler's rise to power under the motto that he was going to help Germany
become a power and avoid war (he obviously didn't). This treaty received mixed reactions.
The most important politicians involved with the signing of this treaty were Georges Clemnéceau of
France, David Lloyd George of Britain, and, of course, the American Woodrow Wilson (28th
President of the United States). Similar to Woodrow Wilson, David Lloyd George, pushed

Women's Failure to Gain the Vote Between 1900-1914 Essay
Women's Failure to Gain the Vote Between 1900–1914 There are many reasons why women failed
to gain the right to vote between 1900 and 1914, these different reasons did not just appear
overnight some were had been institutionalised into the very core of British society over a great
length of time. The other reasons were public responses to, the then, recent actions of the groups
looking to gain the vote for women. For the purpose of this coursework I will separate these reasons
into three major factors that explain why women failed to gain the vote between 1900 and 1914. 1.
Long–term factors: First I am going to study the long–term causes, as it is with these that the climate
of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Women's Social and Political Union was the major group of suffragettes, the Pankhurst family
set this group. The Pankhurst family set up the WSPU because they felt that the suffragists (women
who used peaceful methods to get their point across) tactics had failed to gain any ground in the
fight for a women's vote. During the early twentieth centaury, the social position of women was very
different. The role of a woman was very domestic. They were expected simply to marry, bear
children and look after the home. Women were seen as unintelligent, indecisive, emotional creatures
that could not cope with politics. William Randall Cramer commented that if women got the vote,
they would become masculine and domineering and consequently neglect their household and
marital duties. There were also those that thought that if women had the vote, they would stop
having children, and eventually the human race would die out. When the NUWSS was formed to
campaign for women's suffrage, it was met by horror and disapproval. This made the situation
difficult for the suffragists, but on the other hand perhaps it would be irrational to expect a more
positive response as the traditional social position of women had been upheld for a long time. These

David Lloyd George As A Reformer Of The British Government...
10. David Lloyd George was a reformer in the British government and the prime minister from
December 1915 to October 1922. As a reformer, he tried to establish a budget for social insurance,
rejected by the House of Lords, which led to the Parliamentary Act of 1911, ending the power of
veto of the House of Lords. In the Great War, he convinced the Royal Navy to adopt the convoy
system and united Allied command under General Ferdinand Foch. He was the prime minister at the
negotiations of the Treaty of Versailles, where Britain supported strong terms against Germany. He
secured Irish independence from Britain.
11. The Weimar Republic was established in 1919 after the Kaiser fled the country. The constitution
set up a relatively democratic ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Germany was disarmed after the Great War, and many other countries tried to reduce their weapons.
The Disarmament Movement was eminent through the 1920's; it was a goal of the League of
Nations. However, the closest to disarmament the countries ever reached was the Washington Naval
Conference in 1921, where USA, Japan, Britain and France agreed to limit the size of their navies.
The World Disarmament Conference was established with the purpose of the disarmament, but
tensions ran high, as Germany wanted equal amounts of weapon as France. The talks with Germany
ended when Hitler withdrew from both the League and the Conference in 1933.
13. Inflation is the increase of prices for services or goods and the decrease in the value of money.
Inflation was one of the causes of the dissatisfaction of the Weimer Republic in Germany. Near
1923, as payments of the Treaty of Versailles loomed closer, the "democratic" government was
rushed to print large amounts of money to pay off the debt in time. As a result, an item that cost 100
marks in July 1922 cost 944,000 marks by August 1923; the money became so worthless, some used
German marks for wallpaper. This economic collapse slightly recovered with the Dawes Plan, but
the Great Depression hit, and people looked hopefully toward a new leader: Hitler.
14. French began to occupy the coal–rich area of the Ruhr River Valley in 1923. This occupation
was triggered by the deficiencies in coal payment in accordance

How Did The Versailles Treaty Help Cause Ww2 Dbq
How Did the Versailles Treaty Help Cause World War II? The Great War, or World War I, was a war
that took the lives of 10 million soldiers, seven million civilians, and wounded more than 10 million
men, finally came to an end on November 11, 1918. After the war, a conference was held at the
Versailles Palace, just outside of Paris, to hammer out a treaty. The Prime Minister, Georges
Clemenceau, of France, David Lloyd George of England, and the president, Woodrow Wilson, of the
United States, were the victorious allied nations that came together and created the Versailles Treaty,
where Germany was given no voice and Russia was not represented because they were pulled out of
the war in 1917. For the treaty, Woodrow wanted to create a League ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
As Document C states, "...Germany undertakes, that she will make compensation for all damage
done to the civilian population of the Allied and Associated Powers and to their property during the
period of Belligerency..."(Doc C). Since Germany was responsible for starting the war, they should
be responsible for paying for the damage. But these reparations only angered and humiliated the
Germans because it caused a huge economic downfall since these payments were over $300 billion.
But in the chart shown in Document C, it states that, in 1933, "Hitler comes to power" and ends "all
reparations payments". Ending these payments made Germans come to like Hitler, giving him more
power than before. This then starts to lead to World War II because Hitler is slowly bringing
Germany back up again, and so, they start to follow him and his ideas which starts to cause another
world

The Impact Of Hitler On The Weimar Republic
Everyone knows Hitler as an evil dictator who ruins lives, but do people really know the impact
Hitler made on the Weimar Republic? Throughout this piece it will be discussing the way Hitler
impacted the Weimar Republic. With the events he participated in such as the Treaty of Versailles,
League of Nations, and World War II.
World War I
World War I happened during the years of 1914–1918 this war was caused when Franz Ferdinand,
the Archduke of Austria and his wife were assassinated by Gavrilo Princip who was a Serbian
Nationalist. After they found out about his death Austria wanted war with Serbia for what Princip
had caused, then Germany declares war on Russia for the tsar negotiation. This war was called the
Battle of Tannenberg which Germany won. In 1917 the United States declared war with Germany,
however the U.S. had over a million soldiers fighting against Germany. Eventually Germany
surrendered and "By the fall many of the countries that were involved in the war asked for peace"
(Santos, 2017) so Germany signed an armistice, after the Treaty of Versailles was created for the
fairness after World War I.
Hitler During the War
Hitler was 25 years old when he entered the army during World War I, he was made the Corporal at
the time for showing what a fearless soldier he was. In 1918 his camp site was hit by a gas bomb, he
was near the site at the time when he also got hurt, he became partially blind from the gas
nevertheless he recovered from it.Telling the story of how he

Essay on The Change in Method of Suffragettes Between 1903...
The Change in Method of Suffragettes Between 1903 and 1915 From 1903 through to 1915, the
methods that the suffragettes used to gain the right to vote dramatically changed. In my essay I will
explain how and more importantly why the suffragettes went through several methods to get
themselves noticed by the male government. It was in 1903 when the suffragettes started to try and
gain enough publicity so that they were recognised. This tactic mainly consisted of ineffectual
activities like producing and then distributing leaflets. Most people would just discard or throw
these away. The newly founded WSPU, (which was formed by Emily Pankhust) would also make
pointless petitions and organise moves ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They did this by heckling MP's. This meant that they would chain themselves to MP's houses, their
limo's or anywhere else the MP's were, especially David Lloyd George. They also organised large–
scale demonstrations that would hold up traffic for hours and deliberately get themselves arrested to
gain publicity. All of these things were done to show the government that they were not to be
messed with, but unfortunately the women were only charged with petty vandalism. This is why
Christabelle Pankhurst decided the suffragettes would call the government's bluff and begin their
third campaign, violence. Not only this but they also changed tack because of the situation
concerning the conciliation bills. Lloyd George promised to present a conciliation bill to parliament
if they called off their militancy campaign. They agreed to this but the bill presented was simply
'talked out'. Another two bills suffered the same fate until the women again felt betrayed by the
Liberals and David Lloyd George in particular. Because of this the womens militancy campaign got
worse not better, but at least womens emancipation was being discussed where it mattered most,
parliament. From 1911 the suffragettes went up a gear and tried to call the governments bluff. They
started to cause a real stir and politicians took notice, for the wrong reasons.

Pros And Cons Of The Paris Peace Conference
Many historians continue to argue about president Woodrow Wilson's success at the Paris Peace
Conference, however the conference is regarded as one of Wilson's biggest failures during his days.
The Paris Peace Conference's main goal was to establish the terms of peace after World War One.
Moreover France and Britain which are known as the dominant powers of the Triple Entente, were
seeking revenge and wanted to make Germany suffer after their glorious victory against the Triple
Alliance. On the other hand president Woodrow Wilson was looking to "make the world safe for
democracy (1)." President Woodrow Wilson outlined what he wanted in his famous fourteen points.
His polices led to economic instability in addition to " he invaded a number of ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
President Wilson was seen as an the only idealistic person from the influential people in the
conference. As a matter of fact the Treaty of Versailles is seen from historians' point of views as one
of the main reasons that lead to World War Two. The questions that remains a mystery is where is
the peace that President Wilson wanted and promised for

A. Explain Why the House of Lords Rejected the 1909...
The House of Lords in 1909 consisted mainly of aristocrats that where part of the conservative
party. There are many different reasons for the rejection of the people's budget, which was an idea,
brought forward by David Lloyd George of the Liberal party. The swift rejection by the House of
Lords sparked the first constitutional crisis of the 20th century.
The first reason I am going to bring forward is that this new budget included the idea of taxation on
the rich for money that would go to support the poor. A position in the House of Lords was
inherited; this meant that the peers in the House of Lords were all relations with inherited wealth.
This meant that the people the Budget targeted included the peers in the House of Lords; they ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
With this in mind the peers did not want to be seen as weak in the eyes of the voters, so in order for
them to appear strong they had to reject the budget, showing that they would not fall for the Liberals
tricks. So the rejection of the People's Budget could be seen as an act of strength by the House of
Lords.
The House of Lords were mostly, if not all conservatives. These conservatives argued that this
People's budget was no ordinary budget because it amounted to a social reform. Opponents of this
money bill were worried by the idea of redistributive taxation and also of progressive taxation. This
is because it did not advertise self–help which the conservative party strongly believed in. They
feared that once these principles, of the budget, were established they could be extended to 'soak the
rich' and even out the unfair distribution of income and wealth in Britain. So in 1909 the Lords
vetoed the budget.
I think that the most important point that influenced the House of Lords to vote against the People's
budget is that it may harm their image to the general public. If they looked weak to the voters this
would impact on the number of votes that the conservatives in the House of Lords would get which
in turn would make them weaker. Therefore I think this is the most important point, the peers vetoed
the money bill to make them appear

Revolutionary War Poetry
"It is a satisfaction for Britain in these terrible times that no share of the responsibility for these
events rests on her. She is not the Jonah in this storm. The part taken by our country in this conflict,
in its origin, and in its conduct, has been as honourable and chivalrous as any part ever taken in any
country in any operation." (British Prime Minister David Lloyd George, June 1917) it was a mere 2
weeks ago that our P.M David Lloyd George, preached these words into our very naive and young
minds. But allow me to be the first to tell you, there is nothing "Chivalrous" about this war. England
may not be the Jonah in this storm but we are the people of Nineveh.
Ladies and gentleman, what is it that unites us here today at Whitehall? It is neither our colour, nor
our race, neither religion nor gender. It is our genuine distaste with the harsh and confronting reality
that is this Great War. The war that England ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
the notion of seeing your brothers die in front of your bare eyes, and not be able to do anything to
save them. My poems 'Anthem for Doomed Youth' and 'Dulce Et Decorm Est' explains the conflict
of life bereft of war, as opposed to that involved in it, they are also poems that i wrote from first
hand experiences. 'Anthem for Doomed Youth' is a poem that describes the inevitable mass killing
of soldiers at war whilst 'Dulce Et Decorum Est' brings to life the reality of combat in war – the
physical and emotional state soldiers find themselves in before, during and immediately after a
sudden gas attack. Both these poems will paint a vivid image how and what the soldiers had to go
through every day, and make you all understand how the war is from the perspective of a solider that
has been through gas attacks, whaling shells, gun shots, to see your brothers go to sleep and never
wake up, and the struggles men have to go through after the war, assuming that they do

Lloyd George Contribution
David Lloyd George was a British prime minister during World War I. During this time period,
countries involved in the war went through rough times. This essay will discuss George's early life,
education, his political life, highlights of his ministership during the war, and his life after his
ministership and the war.
On Saturday the 17th day of January, in the year of our Lord, 1863, in Chorlton on Medlock,
Manchester, David Lloyd George was born to William George and Elizabeth Lloyd. Unfortunately,
when Lloyd George was only one, his dad died of pneumonia, forcing his family to move to his
uncle's house. George's uncle, Richard Lloyd, was both a shoemaker and a minister who served at
local churches. Along with being a shoemaker and a minister, Richard Lloyd was also a strong
liberal who influenced George in his political life and his later life. Shortly after moving, George
went to Llanystumdwy National School for educational purposes. After going to Llanystumdwy
Nation School for a few years, he and his family decided that tutors would have more of an
educational influence on him.
In 1884, Lloyd George became a solicitor; he started his practice in 1885. It was also this year he
became politically active; he had campaigned as a Liberal in the 1885 election. On January 24,
1888, David Lloyd George married Margaret Owen. She was from a family of farmers. Lloyd
George also founded a newspaper, the Ugdorn Rhyddid, and won the Llanfrothen burial case. In
1889, he joined the

Paris 1919: The Six Months That Changed The World
Originally titled Peacemakers in 2001, Paris 1919 became the new title after Random House took
over publication in 2002. However, the change in title did not narrow the focus of this study of the
Treaty of Versailles. In fact, her first title may be the more accurate one of the two. Macmillan, in
this one volume history of the Treaty of Versailles, uses the individual peacemakers as a pathway to
portray her arguments about the Treaty of Versailles and the events leading up to it as well as the
events directly following it. Although her most recent title focuses on the "Six months that changed
the world," in no way is her book restricted solely to the six months from January 1919 to June
1919. In fact, the opening quote of the book begins "On December 4, 1918." Margaret Macmillan is
a renowned historian and an even more interesting individual. For starters, she is the great
granddaughter of David Lloyd George, one of the Big Four at the Paris Peace Talks. She has had an
extremely successful career that began ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In its evaluation, it is a well written book that flows with extreme ease. Although there are certain
parts that may be dry, for the most part it is enjoyable to read. Sometimes the details can get in the
way of the main arguments and if extracted, the reading of the book would be enhanced greatly. In
fact, about one–third of the entire book seems to be extraneous, unnecessary information that could
be easily cut out. A removal of these unnecessary comments would make the book much more
manageable and enjoyable for a majority of readers. It would no longer feel like a 500 page book
but instead a 300 page, enjoyable read. In no way is this book one that can be read in a weekend.
Although its arguments are well written and clearly displayed, it takes more than a few hours to sit
down and thoroughly understand this complex volume of

Campaigns for Women Suffrage and their Effectiveness Essay
Campaigns for Women Suffrage and their Effectiveness
Throughout the nineteenth century, the suffragists and the suffragettes worked hard campaigning for
women suffrage. Finally, in 1918, the vote was given to women, but only women over thirty. But
suffrage campaigns, although important, were not the only reason that the franchise was granted.
Some other reasons include, a fear of the return of suffragette activity, the government following an
international trend, the government making changes to the voting system anyway, and the Prime
Minister, David Lloyd George, being more sympathetic to the cause that the previous Prime
Minister was.
The long–term factor was, in fact, the suffrage campaigns. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The suffragists had mixed feelings about this type of tactic. On one hand they admired the heroism
of the suffragettes. This was demonstrated by Millicent Fawcett herself (leader of the suffragists),
'the violence suffered by the suffragettes has been formidableâ€¦what those who endures who
underwent the hunger strike and the anguish of force feeding can hardly be overestimated. Their
courage made a deep impression on the public.' But on the other hand, the violence put off MP's
who would otherwise support the cause, and the suffragists feared that all their hard work would be
wasted. Even though the suffragists weren't too keen on these methods, they led to political debate,
which put the women's right to vote back on the political agenda. Historian, Paula Bartley believes
that the government used the violence as an excuse to withhold the right to vote; they feared that
other groups would adopt similar tactics. However, the government and the suffragists were not the
only people to oppose the campaigns. The press ridiculed women by portraying suffragettes as ugly
middle–aged women, so that they would lose all the respect and support of men that they had
worked so hard at gaining.
In 1914, when war was declared, the suffragettes dropped their violent tactics to show their
patriotism. Women were set to work in their husband's places and this process later

The Contributions Of The Treaty Of Versailles

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Kimberly Thomas

More from Kimberly Thomas (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Contributions Of The Treaty Of Versailles