Mkt 421 Week 4 Advertising

Mkt 421 Week 4 Advertising
Article Choice The four advertisements chosen represented separate, and distinctive, themes. The
first advertisement, for anti–wrinkle cream, utilized a bandwagon approach and a sense of the ideal
retirement life. The second advertisement, for hygiene experts, suggests utilizing the fear of
uncleanliness to sell the services. The third advertisement, for Camel cigarettes, brought a sense of
nostalgia as I remembered spending time, as a child, with my oldest brother prior to his passing. To
summarize, it embodied the ideal picture of a manly outdoorsman. The fourth, and final,
advertisement focused on food and choices. Specifically, one pizza offered two distinctly unique
flavors. Assumptions and Observations Target audience. The first two advertisements ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The primary message of all four advertisements is to portray the product as needed in an individual's
life and that it is the superior option for a multitude of reasons. The first advertisement suggests that
women, primarily although men may or may not take notice of the product for their own use, cannot
achieve youthful skin appearance without the product. The second advertisement installs fear and
doubt, with the offer of services to dispel those fears and doubts. The third provides a blend of fear,
by focusing on men who may be insecure or who wishes to be more manly or perceived in a
different light. Instead of focusing on the product itself, it conveys a sense that smoking Camel
cigarettes will help transform the man into a manly outdoorsman. Finally, the fourth advertisement
offers choice and, in the form of said choice, relief. By focusing on showcasing two unique flavors
per pizza pie offered, it allows those who require significant choice options in their restaurant
experience to be assured that Pizza Planet offers that choice. As mentioned in the targeted audience
portion, this choice is significant for households with diverse preferences when it comes to selecting
a restaurant to eat
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Similarities Between Stop And Frisk
In case one, the police believed that the man was in possession of drugs and as a result of this, they
searched him. Based on my understanding for the Fourth Amendment, in the case of Stop and Frisk,
I believe that the officer should have questioned the man then frisk him before he continued to
search him by putting his hand into the man's pocket. I say this because there was reasonable
suspicion.
Similarly, in case two, the police were in search of a man in order to question him about a recent
bombing. So they asked a woman if they were able to search their house without a warrant.
Eventually, they intruded the woman's house because of suspicion. However, the officers had no
right to enter the woman's home because they did not have a search

Freedom Of Speech In Universities
Freedom of Speech https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/22/us/berkeley–free–speech.html There are
good things are bad things when it comes to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech it where we are
allowed to do and say whatever we want. That bad thing about it is we use in for the bad things
instead of the good. In this article it goes on about the freedom of speech in Berkeley which it a
university. Many students give out their opinion. Many say that the hate and violence speech should
not be allow and some say they should. A young lady named Sabreen Abdulrahman said that the
students who come say hatred things are no good for the student community in her school and I
agree. Then there William who said they should be allowed because the people should

Comparasion of Frederick Douglass's 4th of July Speech &...
Rhetorical Equality Successful, self–educated abolitionists Frederick Douglass and Booker T.
Washington fought tirelessly to eradicate slavery. Born into slavery, Douglass and Washington
shared the belief of equality, but differed on the manner in which it would be achieved. Douglass's
philosophy was "agitate!, agitate!, agitate!" whereas, Washington was of the 'work!, work!, work!"
mindset. Through his crafty use of rhetoric, Douglass delivered a scathing attack on the hypocrisy of
America in his self–referential speech, "What to the Slave is the Fourth of July." The speech
articulated his passionate pursuit for liberty and equal rights. Douglass's speech passionately argued
that in the eyes of the slave and even the "free" black ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"For the present, it is enough to affirm the equal manhood of the Negro race. Is it not astonishing
that, while we are ploughing, planting and reaping, using all kinds of mechanical tools, erecting
houses, constructing bridges, building ships, working in metals of brass, iron, copper, silver and
gold...that, while we are engaged in all manner of enterprises common to other men...we are called
upon to prove that we are men!" (Douglass) During his speech, Douglass elaborated on the different
aspects of why blacks have a natural right to freedom as any other human being He argued it is
wrong to turn a man into a "brute" and proceeded to argue that slavery is not divine in its origin.
Douglass's speech was a calling for equality, for change. He accomplished his goal and proved the
fourth of July was a revolting reminder to him and those like him of the continual inhumane cruelty
American attempted to conceal through its mockery. In contrast to Douglass, Washington's famous
speech known as the "1865 Atlantic Compromise" was not a protest or challenge of the political
system, nor did he speak about the lack of social equality. Instead he focused his efforts on what
blacks could accomplish, how they could compromise. He believed the militant rhetoric of Douglass
and others distracted blacks from the path of liberty, equality, and economic success. Washington's
speech emphasized that it was the dual responsibility of blacks and whites to make the blacks a
more

Mapp Vs. Ohio Case Analysis
Mapp v. Ohio was a very serious case that dealt with the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment. This
case got worse very quickly. Mapp v. Ohio involved a young lady and three officers. Ms. Mapp was
known as Rosa Parks of the Fourth Amendment in her city. The Mapp v. Ohio trail was a
monumental case that involved police officers searching a house for bomb evidence that lead to
upholding individual rights against "reseach search and seizures," making the case popular. Dollree
Mapp is from Forest, Mississippi. Mapp was born in 1923 and later died in 2014. Mapp had a pretty
huge family growing up. She was one of seven children from the parents of Samuel and Mary
Mapp. Ms. Mapp only 38 years old when this whole case started out. She was also a single

The Historical Perspectives Of The Columbus Day Became A...
Challenging Historical Perspectives
The course Survey of Literature I not only explored, but analyzed a wide range of texts from
different eras. Each text allowed students to critically analyze different factors, including what time
period it was written during, why it was written by the author, who the audience was and other
literary components. The texts entitled Letter to Ferdinand and Isabella Regarding the Fourth
Voyage (with the aid of Letter to Luis de Santangel Regarding the First Voyage), Clotel, and Fourth
of July were critical texts in the course because they helped readers challenge their point of view
with regard to common historical perspectives.
For instance, readers knew how in fourteen hundred and ninety–two Columbus sailed the ocean
blue. His discovery of America, and not the Indies as he originally thought, would be significant in
history. Thus, Columbus Day became a national holiday in the United States in 1937 under President
Theodore Roosevelt and would later become a national holiday in 1971. It signified the "celebration
and commemoration of Christopher Columbus' discovery of the New World" (Hitchmough).
However, Columbus Day also sparked controversy with regard to the underlying associations
between Columbus, "racism", "imperialism" and "ensuing genocide" with concern to the treatment
of the Native Americans during this expedition (Hitchmough). Thus, illustrating a different man than
the heroic like figure history perceived and has continued to

China 's Nationalism And Isolation From Western Society
For thousands of years China has operated dynastically, in a cyclic mode, causing no forward
movement or linear progress. China's ethnocentrism and isolation from Western society led to
internal disorder. The isochronous nature of the Chinese feudal system eventually led to the demise
of the last dynasty, the Qing Dynasty, in 1911. This vulnerability provided Western influence
allowing for imperialism throughout the country. Students and intellectuals with Westernized
educations saw that the political and social turmoil was attributed to a long history of rejection of
anything Western. On May 4, 1919, students led a revolt, called the May Fourth Movement, against
Confucian culture promoting science, democracy, and anti–imperialism. The May Fourth Movement
was a period of total iconoclasm, of complete rejection of past tradition, and of absolute ratification
of western ideals resulting in a literary revolution. By exploring Lu Xun's realist writing style and
Yu Dafu's romantic writing style, the true function of literature during the May Fourth era is
revealed.
May Fourth Background: The May Fourth movement occurred as a response to the Chinese
government's poor response to the Treaty of Versailles, known as the Shandong problem. The Treaty
of Versailles took the rights to the Shandong providence, in China, from Germany and gave them to
Japan. When attending the meeting, China came with three requests; first was abolition of all foreign
privileges, second was the

The Fourth Amendment And The 4th Amendment
A persons property is often what they take pride in, which makes it easy to see why the saying "a
mans home is his castle" is so popular and widely understood. So when the gates of their castle get
knocked down and their treasures taken; the king of the castle is left with nothing to hold as his own.
Americans right to be secure is the moat surrounding their castle, it guarantees Americans protection
against unreasonable search and seizure. The right to be secure is guaranteed in the 4th amendment
of the Bill of Rights, which is a section of the U.S. Constitution listing a citizens guaranteed rights.
The U.S. Constitution was written in 1787 but lacked the support required to be ratified; as it needed
support from 9 of the 13 states prior to its ratification. The constitution received the backing of its
9th state after adding the Bill of Rights to the Constitution. The addition of a Bill of Rights was
required for the support of many states as one of the largest concerns the states had with the
Constitution was that the Government would have too much power and control over citizens. So the
addition of a Bill or Rights stating what the Government may or may not do as well as guaranteeing
the freedoms and rights of citizens helped end the states concerns. The support after the addition of
the Bill of Rights led to the Constitutions ratification on March 4th, 1789. As stated by the Legal
Information Institute; the Fourth Amendment guarantees "[t]he right of the people to be

The Case Of Olmstead V. United States
Unreasonable search is the pursuit of an individual on his/her premises and/or vehicles for seizure to
obtain evidence by a lawful agency without a court order and without probable cause it is believed
evidence of a criminal activity will be found. The fourth amendment of the U.S. Constitution shields
our Citizens from preposterous inquiry and seizure. The case of Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S.
438 (1928), various individuals were convicted of alcohol related law violations, and were accused
of conspiracy. The operation grossed a generous amount of cash. The main schemer and the general
administration of the business was one of the Petitioners, Olmstead (the "Solicitor"). The primary
office of the business was in Seattle and there were three phones in the workplace, each on an
alternate line. There were phones in an office the Petitioner had in his own home, and at the home of
his partners and different places in Seattle. A great deal of correspondence happened in the between
Seattle and Vancouver, British Columbia. The data which prompted the discovery of the trick and
tendency and degree was generally gotten by catching messages on the phones of the backstabbers
by four government denial officers. Little wires were embedded along the common phone wires
from the living arrangements of four of the [suspects] and those driving from the boss office. The
insertions were made without trespass upon any property of the suspects, in the cellar of the office
building. The

The Pros And Cons Of The Fourth Amendment
In terms of reflecting what I have learned in this course since Module 1, the Fourth Amendment
became clearer to me. The Fourth Amendment is comprehended as putting limitations on the
legislature whenever it confines (seizes) or looks through a man or property. The Fourth Amendment
additionally gives that "no warrants might issue, yet upon probable cause, bolstered by vow or
assertion, and especially portraying the place to be sought and the people or things to be grabbed."
The thought is that to maintain a strategic distance from the shades of malice of general warrants,
each inquiry or seizure ought to be cleared ahead of time by a judge, and that to get a warrant the
administration must show "probable cause"; a specific level of doubt of criminal movement to
legitimize the hunt or seizure. To the degree that a warrant is required in principle before police can
seek, there are such many special cases that practically speaking warrants seldom are acquired.
Police can search cars without warrants, they can confine individuals in the city without them, and
they can simply seek or seize in a crisis without setting off to a judge. The way that the Fourth
Amendment most generally is tried is in criminal procedures. The Supreme Court chose in the mid–
twentieth century that if the police seize prove as a component of an unlawful inquiry, the
confirmation can't be conceded into court. This is known as the "exclusionary rule." It is dubious
because much of the time confirm is

Lao She's Play 'The Yutai Teahouse'
Lao She's play "The Yutai teahouse" demonstrates the formation of China from Qing dynasty to The
Republic of China. The Yutai teahouse has various meanings and interpretations. Lao She has
created the play with in depth symbolic meaning. The meaning of the teahouse changes over time
for the Chinese population but it stays the same for the main character Wang Lifa. The teahouse
symbolizes the Qing Dynasty. The on going problems with the teahouse are the depiction of the on
going revolt around the Qing Dynasty before the rise of The Republic of China. The play has a
political theme of the revolt in China and Lao She uses various characters to illustrate the situation
and develop the theme in the play. The fate of the main character Wang Lifa portrays the ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He is a part of the middle class in the society. He is a part of the Manchu Banner, which is the
warrior class in the society. Manchu bannermen were granted land and income. He is a kind man
different from everybody else around him "Third–born Li, take them outside and give them two
bowls of noodles with minced pork" This shows how kind and helpful of a man Fourth Elder Chang
is and the people around him are not especially Wang Lifa who says that there are thousands of poor
people and nobody can do anything about it. (36). Fourth Elder also brings patriotism to the Yutai
teahouse. He is very proud of his beliefs and thinks that products produced in China are superior to
the products produced in foreign countries. "What I', trying to figure out is why we all have so many
foreign things. Old Lie, look at yourself; a foreign snuff bottle, a foreign watch, a gown of foreign
satin, and a jacket and trousers made of foreign cotton." (27–28) Fourth Elder Chang is very set
about his ways, which often leads him into trouble. Lao she depicts all his character in the play
somewhat similar to the up and downs in the real China at the time of the

Why Is Deadpool Better Than Spider Man
Bang bang, gunshots rang out over the streets as Deadpool's enemies fall to the ground, now they
can't harm anyone. Deadpool's powers are absolutely amazing. Deadpool uses situations that happen
in everyday life. Deadpool has a great background. Why is Deadpool better than Spider–Man.
Deadpool has by far the best powers in the Marvel Universe. One could easily think that Spider–
Man's "Spidey sense" is the best power to have, however what this argument overlooks is that in
issue four hundred of The Amazing Spider–Man, Peter uses his "Spidey sense" to dodge a bullet but
Aunt May is standing behind him and gets hit. If it had been Deadpool he would have broken the
fourth wall and moved everyone around so the marksman gets hit. Deadpool's powers ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is sad that people use profanity in real life everyday, but it does happen, so when Deadpool uses
profanity it makes him more real world. Spider–Man gets his head bashed in and doesn't really show
anger, when Deadpool gets his head bashed in he gets angry and kills the villain so they can't harm
anyone anymore. In Spider–Man no one really dies except for people close to him, all of the 8.406
million people in New York City seem to never even get injured. Deadpool has more real world
concepts and situations than Spider–Man. Deadpool has a way better background than Spider–Man.
Mutated cancer cells are more realistic than being bitten by an irradiated spider. There are people in
real life with mutated cells, like people with Heterochromia iridum, or the mutation that gives a
person different colored eyes. According to gizmodo.com Peter would probably pee out the toxins
within 14 days, the DNA wouldn't have time to combine with each other. Deadpool's background is
just more realistic than Spider–Man's. Deadpool is better than Spider–Man. Deadpool's powers are
better than Spider–Man's. Deadpool is more real world than Spider–Man. Deadpool has a better
background than Spider–Man. Spider–Man is old news, Deadpool is

Women's Roles In The Bell Jar Sylvia Plath
Women's Roles in "The Bell Jar"
How would one feel if they had to drop all of their dreams and goals in order to look good for the
neighbors? How would one feel if all they were used for was to conceive their spouses child? Those
instances don't sound too good, well a woman's role in the 1950's was just that. In the dark novel
written by Sylvia Plath, Esther Greenwood is constantly battling an inner conflict of listening to
society which leads her to battling depression. Plath shows the women's roles and the challenges of
how women must sacrifice their dreams to become wives and mothers through Esther's accountings.
The accounting of where Esther is staying shows the normalcy and what the woman's role was in
this era. For instance while Esther is describing her hotel she explains, "This hotel––the Amazon––
was for women only, and they were mostly girls my age with wealthy parents...and they were all
going to posh secretarial schools...where they had to wear hats and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
For instance while she and Buddy are watching a woman give birth she accounts, "The woman's
stomach stuck up so high I couldn't see her face or the upper part of her body at all. She seemed to
have nothing but an enormous spider–fat stomach and two little ugly spindly legs propped in the
high stirrups and all the time the baby was being born she never stopped making this unhuman
whooing noise"(Plath 35). Plath is using the visual imagery of the description of the woman's body
to show how grueling it is to go through childbirth, how Esther is challenging the fact to even have a
baby if having to endure that much pain. Plath is also using the metaphor of comparing the woman's
body to a spider to show how nasty and unwanted childbirth truly is, which is against how society
celebrates childbirth, Esther views it as

The Amendment Of The Rights Of Those Accused Of A Crime
The three amendments that are used to protect the rights of those accused of a crime include, the
Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment. "The Fourth Amendment in the Constitution, contains
protection against unreasonable searches and seizures and protects people's homes, property, and
effects" (as cited in Peak, 2015, p. 180). "The Fifth Amendment in the Constitution, among other
protections, guards against self–incrimination and double jeopardy" (as cited in Peak, 2015, p. 180).
"The Sixth Amendment in the Bill of Rights, guarantees the right to a speedy and public trial by an
impartial jury, the right to effective counsel at trial and other protections" (as cited in Peak, 2015, p.
180). These three Amendments, in summary mean that any person who is accused of a crime is
innocent until proven guilty, and their rights are just as important as anyone else. They have the
natural born right to have their rights as citizens protected under the law, and ensure fair treatment
from law enforcement officers.
In 1993, the Supreme Court ruled a decision on the court case, Minnesota v. Dickerson. This court
case followed the court ruling in 1968, which was the original stop and frisk case, Terry v. Ohio. In
Terry v. Ohio, "The Supreme Court of the United States held that it is a reasonable search when an
officer performs a quick seizure and a limited search for weapons on a person that the officer
reasonably believes could be armed. A typical beat officer would be unduly burdened by

Global Echoes Of Atlantic Enlightenment And Revolution
Global Echoes of Atlantic Enlightenment and Revolution There are many different crucial sources
that demonstrate the global influences of Atlantic revolutionary movements and Enlightenment
views on human rights. Enlightenment philosophies of government and human rights ignited the
revolutionary transformation in all of the Atlantic world. Political leaders on both sides of the
Atlantic wanted to incorporate European Enlightenment concepts into their societies. Revolutions
began to build on one another, taking the different ideas from other regions and implementing them
into their own societies. The American, French, Spanish and Haitian revolutions triggered the
development of new human rights all around the world. One of the primary sources that
demonstrates the global influences of the Atlantic revolutionary movements and Enlightenment
views on human rights is the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen. This primary source was
written by the French National Assembly including Marquis de Lafayette during the French
Revolution. Thomas Jefferson served as an ambassador to France and also helped write the majority
of the American Declaration of Independence. Because of Jefferson, the French and American
declarations were quite similar. During all of the Atlantic revolutions, areas were trying to
implement basic human rights for all equal men. The French declaration states that public
misfortune and government corruption is caused by ignorance and neglect. With that

What Violates The Fourth Amendment?
What Violates the Fourth Amendment? "Unreasonable search and seizures shall not be violated, and
no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly
describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." – Amendment IV The
most controversial aspect of the fourth amendment is the debate over what constitutes as a
legitimate search. Since the amendment's addition to the constitution on December 15, 1791,
citizens have questioned police action. The case of United States vs. Jacobsen states that "A seizure
of property occurs when the government meaningfully interferes with a person's possessory
interest." With this great debate in effect, a theory was introduced called ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
However, before this case, the case of Terry vs. Ohio also helped set the investigatory bar. Terry vs.
Ohio involved the Supreme Court's decision in deciding whether it was of reason for a police officer
to stop a person and search him, when less than probable cause for an arrest was present. The
consequences presented in Terry vs. Ohio were put forth but examination of the "reasonable
balancing test." By doing so, a balancing test that has a wider variety of causes is now in effect. In
this landmark case, it was held that policemen are permitted to perform a "stop and frisk" pat down,
if there is reasonable suspicion that the person is presently dangerous and carrying a deadly weapon.
This "stop and frisk" method was later extended to vehicle arrests as well. After the case of Terry vs
Ohio, this wider variety of the balancing test came into effect the case of Louisiana vs. Morgan. In
this case, Johnny Morgan was observed walking at a rather quick pace, late at night, at a poorly lit
area, by a policeman named Sergeant Brown. After realizing that it was a deputy watching him,
Morgan fled and was apprehended by Brown. After noticing the man sweating and seeming to grow
nervous, Brown found what looked to be a crack pipe. Crack cocaine was also discovered in the
defendant's pockets. Morgan was arrested a hauled off to jail where he was charged with possession
of

Rhetorical Analysis Of What To The Slave Is The Fourth Of...
In his 1852 speech "What to the Slave is the Fourth of July", Frederick Douglass passionately
argued that to the slave and all other Americans, the Fourth of July is nothing more than a mockery
of the grossest kind; that the United States stood by hypocrisy to the values they ultimately swore
by. In his speech, Douglass made four clear points: (1) "This holiday is to rejoice for the sake of
freedom and liberty"; (2) "My people have no freedom, have no liberty"; (3) "You rejoice, my
people mourn" (4); "This holiday is a mockery to us". In making these points Douglass exposed the
hypocrisy and ignorance of the nation. Douglass produced his argument with the use of several
rhetorical strategies. Douglass used rhetorical questions that created a distinct separation between
the slaves and freemen of the United States; the use of repetition of important phrases left a clear
and concise impression on the listener, while using the logic and credibility of the Bible to
communicate claims. Douglass began his speech to the audience by asking a series of rhetorical
questions in addition to the use of sarcasm. He referred to the Declaration of Independence as "that"
instead of "the" Declaration stressing a separation between African–Americans and the freemen of
the United States. He extended the use of his rhetoric by asking, "What have I or those, I represent,
to do with your national independence?" Slaves, whose freedom is denied, do not share other
Americans' patriotic feelings regarding the Fourth of July. His use of these rhetorical questions was
valid because it separated Douglass as a different man than the rest of his white audience.
Furthermore, Douglass asked, "Would you have me argue that man is entitled to liberty?" He
indicated that people knew in their hearts that all were entitled to freedom. Douglass demonstrated
sarcasm in this principle of freedom, almost as if the aforementioned rhetorical question shouldn't
need to be stated. He further declared that the stigma separating free whites and enslaved African–
Americans was blatantly foolish. Similar to using sarcasm, Douglass repeated numerous phrases that
reflected the idea that mentioning the points were already redundant, because equality

Gross National Happiness By Herbert Spencer
Gross National Happiness, The Introduction of Democracy; Categorizing the Fourth King (Eventful
or Event–making, Transactional or Transformational)
Herbert Spencer introduces the idea of two types of leaders which are the eventful man and the
event making man. The event–making man is a man whose actions influenced development. He
finds/creates the "fork in the road" whereas an eventful man stumbles upon greatness, anyone can do
it. In terms of making big decisions, one is special and the other isn't. "The eventful man in history
is any man whose actions influenced subsequent developments along a quite different course than
would have been followed if these actions had not meet taken. The event making man is an eventful
man whose actions are the consequences of outstanding capacities of intelligence, will, and
character rather than of accidents of position" (Hook 25–26). When the 17 year old crown prince
ascended to the throne, Bhutan was still as researcher Thierry Mathou describes it, an "isolated
country with a conservative and traditionalist polity". He states that although it is definite that the
Third King had initiated most significant and substantial reforms between 1952 and 1972 in the
political, diplomatic, social and economic spheres. None of the changes occurring during the last
thirty years would have been possible without going through this period. Yet those reforms had little
impact on the way the general populace was able to picture itself as an actor of

Arguments Against The Fourth Amendment
The fourth amendment of the constitution expresses that each individual have a right "to be secure
in their persons, house, papers, and impacts against irrational pursuits and seizures, "might not be
disregarded, and no warrant's should issue, but rather upon reasonable justification, supported by
vow or affirmation and especially depicting the spot to be locked, and the persons or things to be
seized. –Fourth Amendment, U.S. Constitution The Fourth Amendment has limits on the
government's rights to search our houses and businesses and to seize documents and other personal
effects. It requires that the government should have reasonable cause for the search and seizure. That
is, there must be a proof to support the specific search. The main drawback of the Fourth
Amendment is first, personal information is not safe in our homes or in our offices. Most of the laws
allow police to get access from nongovernment databases without any ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The information which was held by the agents was used to obtain a search warrant and the agents
searched Olmstead's home and seized documents of address of clients and liquor. Olmstead was
arrested for violating the federal laws of breaking the transportation and illegal sale of liquor. The
fourth amendment states that every individual has privacy and is very important for every person.
Olmstead was proved as convict in district court and then Olmstead consulted 9th circuit court
appeals saying that the district court judge is denying his motion of expressiveness and then finally
U.S. Supreme Court granted the permission and upheld the decision of the 9th circuit court of
appeals. The 3 judge panel of circuit court appeals gave official opinions on the

Creative Writing: Firefighters
The sun was beating down on the Nevada ground. Everything was silent, an uneasy silent like quiet
before a storm. Then sirens of all kinds. All heading to the same place, the old dusty inn on the
outskirts of town. Garrett Giles was excited to be starting his new job at the fire station. All the work
he put into starting his career was about to pay off. He walked into the firehouse with a skip in his
step and a happy attitude. What he saw crushed all of his preconceived notions of what it would be
like. There was no one springing into action. There were no bouts of spontaneous heroism. Just a
group of men sitting around a circular table playing what appeared to be poker. "Umm, I am in the
right place right? I'm the new guy, Garret, I talked ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The other men claimed it was just because he was new, but it didn't make him feel any better. The
fact he wasn't helping anyone, except maybe the janitor, tore down his whole interpretation of what
it meant to be a firefighter. The only reason he stuck with it is because everyone assured him he
would have a chance to prove himself soon enough.
The call of the week had the chief and three others out in the field, leaving Anderson and Giles by
themselves in the station playing cards. Everything was quiet and the next second the alarms were
blaring in their ears and red lights were flashing. They jumped into action just as they were trained
to do. They ran out to the second truck and found where the fire was, an old dusty inn on the
outskirts of town.
They flipped on the sirens and headed out. When they got there the fire was blazing throughout all
three stories of the motel. They quickly got to work when they heard a scream from the second floor.
Without thinking Giles ran into the burning building. He ran quickly and carefully through the
building coughing along the way. This was his chance to help someone and he wasn't going to let
anyone take it away. Finally he got to a woman on the second floor. She was petrified and unsure
what to do without getting hurt. He coaxed her out of the burning building and to an ambulance
where an EMT took her into the ambulance. He finally got back and helped Anderson put out what
was left of the

How Did Douglass Celebrate The Fourth Of July
In 1852, civil rights activist Fredrick Douglass was asked to give a speech in celebration of the
fourth of July. He delivered a powerful speech, his words may not have been what the audience was
expecting. Douglass highlighted many points as to why a slave wouldn't want to celebrate this
holiday. He even pondered he had been asked in jest to deliver this type of speech. He did not feel
that he had any reason to celebrate nor would the people in this country that have been continuously
oppressed by this nation which claimed to be free for all men. Douglass thought of this celebration
as a sham. He believed that this nation had become free for the white man but not for him or the
ethnic groups in America. As Douglass stated in his poignant speech, there were not many reasons to
celebrate the fourth of July if one was a slave. To the white man, this holiday represented the
freedom and independence that they earned by defeating the British. These men were now truly free.
This was not the case for many ethnic groups at this time. The idea of freedom was still just a dream
to them. It was never discussed that the way this freedom was ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
However, some may see the situation in a different way. They may believe that the signing of the
Declaration of Independence was for every man and the beginning of an evolution. Many respected
the courage shown by all Americans during this time that fought for freedom. This included people
of many ethnic backgrounds. This unity is what helped to create a powerful nation. If it were not for
the courage of these men and women, regardless of ethnicity, someone like Fredrick Douglass
would not have been invited to make his courageous speech. Even though this country was built
upon by the brutality and oppression of many of their indigenous people, it was a young country that
would evolve into something great and

Social Media And The Criminal Justice System
Portland reported that she was being followed by a man one morning in mid–June. Taryn Border
said he stood there, maintaining direct eye contact for five minutes, without flinching, while she
proceeded to call the police. Border said that her interaction with Officer Foesch was disturbing.
Foesch repeatedly mocked and laughed at her, sarcastically asking how long she had been a police
officer. A photo with Border's statement about the incident was posted on Facebook on June 17,
2016 and now has more than 63,000 shares. This one post has the people of Portland, and the rest of
the country believing that they cannot trust the criminal justice system. Social Media is a strong
voice of the people but, not many of those voices tell the positive stories of the criminal justice
system.
The purpose of this paper to show the negative and positive effect that social media brings to the
Criminal Jusice Department. Social Media plays a key role in how many people view the criminal
justice field. The way people write, post, blog, share or record a situation, whether true or not, it will
spread like wildfire. The department, either right or wrong, will be penalized and reprimanded by
people who were not at the scene by directly responding to a positive or negative situation through
social media.
The main goal of policemen is to serve and protect the people of this country; this means doing
things that others are afraid of, like fighting a man twice their size or forcing people to follow

Rhetorical Analysis Of What To The Slave Is The Fourth Of...
Fedrick Douglass, former slave and leader of the 19th Century Abolitionist Movement, in his speech
"What to the Slave is the Fourth of July," he asks his fellow–citizens what the Fourth of July is to a
former slave, during Independence Day, at Rochester in 1852. In his speech, Douglass asks what
does he and the people he represents have to do with the new found national independence. He
speaks about the injustice his people go through because of the sole reason that Independence Day
doesn't apply to them and how there is no point in arguing this point. In "What to the Slave is the
Fourth of July," Fedrick Douglass effectively uses two rhetorical appeals, pathos, and logos, to
inform the public that the Fourth of July was not his but of the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He shows much emotion when arguing his reasons on why he and his people aren't a part of The
Fourth of July. Douglass mentions in his speech that the Fourth of July is "A day that reveals to [the
slave], more than all other days in the year, the gross injustice and cruelty to which he is the constant
victim. To him, your celebration is a sham; your boasted liberty, an unholy license; your national
greatness, swelling vanity; your sounds of rejoicing are empty and heartless, with all your religious
parade, and solemnity, are, to him, mere bombast, fraud, deception, impiety, and hypocrisy–a thin
veil to cover up crimes which would disgrace a nation of savages." He achieves his approach to
pathos by stating that he a former slave who escaped is still fearful of being returned the life of a
slave again and directly emphasizing his words towards the audience making them feel guilty.
Fredrick Douglass logos strongly appeals when he mentions Lysander Spooner, William Goodell,
Samuel E. Sewall, and Gerrit Smith by stating that these four men fully and clearly vindicated the
constitution from any design to support slavery. Douglass also mentions the signers of the
Declaration of Independence declaring them as wise men and how they made a good resolution to
gain their freedom and others as well. He states that "the Declaration of Independence is the ring–
bolt to the chain of your nation's destiny; so, indeed, I regard it." (What to

A Holiday Essay Holiday
Holiday Essay Have you ever had to leave a party because your dad was fully ready to cause serious
bodily harm? I have. Every year we would go to two Fourth of July parties; now we go to one. I
think everyone who has celebrated the holiday has at least one memory of the time something went
haywire during Independence Day. Lots of people party on the Fourth of July and things tend to go
wrong every now and then but it does not usually stop people from partying. In our case it did
hinder the festivities. What could have happened that was so bad that we quit going? This is the
story of the time a drunk man shot fireworks at children. Fourth of July is a big holiday for many
Americans. We celebrate the anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence from
England in 1776. Most people celebrate by watching firework displays or setting of some
themselves, if the weather and laws permit. America is a nation full of pyromaniacs. Who could
blame us? Fire is fun. Fire is not the only fun thing about the Fourth though. Cookouts and parties
are common, as is alcohol. Sometimes accidents happen when pyrotechnics and alcohol mix, such
as: destroyed property, like a shirt catching an ember and having a hole burned through it, fires if the
wind spends a spark dancing into a tree or some grass, missing fingers (do not hold firecrackers, I
repeat do not hold firecrackers), and burns, sometimes, even if you do everything right, something
could still go wrong. Some people find

Essay about Fredrick Douglass
On July 5th 1852, Frederick Douglass, one of history's outstanding public speakers, carried out a
very compelling speech at Corinthian Hall in Rochester, New York. Within that moment of time
where the freedom of Americans was being praised and celebrated, he gathered the nation to clear
up the tension among slavery and the establishment of the country's goals. Frederick Douglass's
speech mentions the development of the young nation, the Revolution, and his own life experience.
While speaking, his main subject was seen to be American slavery. The "Fourth of July Oration"
was a commendable model of Frederick Douglass's affection and engagement towards the freedom
of individuals. Frederick Douglass's speech left an impact on his audience ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Slaves' future lives all depended on who would "win" them and buy them. For Douglass, it was
unbearable to observe human beings cry in desperation and pain. Frederick's mistress was the only
person, besides himself, that was able to experience pure dismay; causing them to ache together and
understand the terror. Frederick Douglass asks a very powerful and remarkable question to the
audience of "Fourth of July Oration." He merely asks what is the Fourth of July to an American
slave. He simply answers his own question. He believed that the Fourth of July was a day that
demonstrated the brutality and the inhuman actions done to the victims of this torture. It was a day
that demonstrated the terror more than any other day of the year. It was not a day of glorification,
but simply a reminder of wrongdoing. Douglass was positive that there wasn't any other place on
earth that could have been responsible for such dreadful, appalling, and shameful manners, but only
the United States of America. He mentions the job of a slave owner and what the slave–trade
consists of. He uses the term swine drover. Swine drovers are those who enter Southern states,
weapons in hand. They would treat men, women, and children like animals, "reared like swine for
the market." (p. 267) The victims of these swine drovers would be chained and taken from their
family. Men were looked upon as horses, while women were analyzed by slave–buyers, specifically

Frederick Douglass Speech
Frederick Douglass was a powerful voice for African Americans. he was born a slavery yet was
taught to read and write. Frederick later escaped to New York and began touring around the country.
he was an abolitionist, advocate for equal rights and was a part of the anti slavery society. He spoke
on July 5, 1852, in Rochester, New York. His speech was called 'The Meaning of July Fourth for the
Negro'. The purpose of his speech was to give his opinions on the well known holiday, the fourth of
July. Reading the speech made me feel dumbfounded, amused and frustrated The Fourth of July is
America's independence day from Britain. However, slaves remained in the same position until after
the civil war. This is the reason why Douglass says and believes "This Fourth July is yours, not
mine. You may rejoice, I must mourn. To drag a man in fetters into the grand illuminated temple of
liberty, and call upon him to join you in joyous anthems, were inhuman mockery and sacrilegious
irony." I'm left both speechless and amused on how true this statement is. Americans expected
everyone to celebrate their day with them. While remaining hypocrites having once slaves and now
segregation within their 'free' and 'fair' nation. No one should expect respect or happiness from
people Americana has hurt. Frederick states "Do you mean, citizens, to mock me, by asking me to
speak to–day? If so, there is a parallel to your conduct. And let me warn you that it is dangerous to
copy the example of a nation

The United States Supreme Court Decisions
As a student or professional in the criminal justice field, one will undoubtedly cross paths with the
Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The right of the people to be secure in their
persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and
particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. (U.S. Const.
amend. IV) The source of many United States Supreme Court decisions, these often debated words
seek to protect citizens against abuses of power by the government. Although the intent of these few
words are clear, the debate stems from the attempts to interpret the intent of the framers. Three
major interpretations have been developed from the debates surrounding the Fourth Amendment to
the U.S. Constitution. These interpretations are the warrant approach, the reasonableness approach
and the special needs approach. We will begin by discussing the warrant approach which is also the
traditional approach to interpret the Fourth Amendment. The warrant approach focused on limiting
valid searches to those done with a warrant based on probable cause (Bacigal, 1979). This meant
that in order for a search to be valid under the Fourth Amendment there had to be judicial approval
in advance of the search except when justified by absolute necessity (Stelzner, 1979). Proponents of
this approach

Olmstead V. United States Case Study
In the case of Olmstead v. United States, the legal questions raised at the trial were whether the use
of evidence gained from wiretaps and confiscated papers violated the Fourth Amendment protection
against unreasonable searches and seizures and whether the use of evidence gained from wiretaps
and confiscated papers violate the Fifth Amendment protection against self–incrimination? The
Federal courts held that the use of wiretaps did not violate the Fourth Amendment. Further, the
Supreme Court upheld the argument that there was a clear distinction between letters and phone
conversations and tapping of phone conversations cannot be held against anyone without their
expressed consent (www.fjc.gov). The Supreme Court also held that a warrantless

Old Spice Rhetorical Devices
Authors can convey abstract ideas or non–existent characters to life with the assistance of rhetorical
devices by communicating the nature of emotions to the intended audience. Allowing the audience
to connect and relate with the abstract ideas. The usage of apostrophe can be found in literature and
even in media. The usage of apostrophe is most evident within the Old Spice commercials. Isaiah
Mustafa plays the role as the "man your man could smell like" in the commercial, who narrates and
performs a simple monolog throughout. Mustafa can directly connect with the audience with the
assistance of "breaking the fourth wall," to guide their directions and appeal to their emotions. As a
marketing technique, the motives of these Old Spice commercial is an attempt to appeal to the
female audience whereas typically it is geared towards men. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Pointing towards the king's chamber covered in blood, Macbeth acknowledges the dagger's presence
and communicates with it. With mixed feelings, Macbeth encounters contradicting thoughts on
executing the king in effort to gain power. The dagger symbolizes Macbeth's bloody destiny, and
Macbeth's vision of this dagger is one of the many hallucinations and visions that creates a motif of
deception throughout the play. Closely related with apostrophe, personification is a rhetorical device
used to give human characteristics to objects, inanimate ideas, and animals. Apostrophe is "a term
used when a speaker directly addresses someone or something that is not present (Shmoop)." For
example, the stars danced playfully in the moonlit sky. The stars are personified, given human
characteristics, with human abilities to dance. Thus, we can say that the star has been personified in
the give sentence. In an apostrophe, persons are merely referred to, however, in personification
objects are given human

U.s. Supreme Court And The Fourth Amendment
The U.S. Supreme Court and the Fourth Amendment
Since the founding of the American Democracy, partisanship has always been a major problem
when it comes to political aspects of the law. The Constitution was designed to implement laws into
our country that would make our governing body run smoother with fewer conflicts. However, when
dealing with Democracy based on the "people's word" it is hard to avoid such conflicts. Since each
citizen in our country has the right to freedom of speech and thought, the interpretation of various
parts of the Constitution have become heavily analyzed when dealing with cases of various crimes
that happen in the United States. Each judge on the Supreme Court is entitled to his or her own
political ideology so it is a constant debate as to whether a judge has biases on a particular issue
based on political views. These biases weave through our justice system creating a disarray of views
and arguments that always reflect back on the judges and their presentation, or lack their of, of
American ways. The Supreme Court of the United States, also known as the highest judicial body in
the country, leads the federal judicial system. The Supreme Court is made up of the Chief Justice
and eight other Associate Justices. With presidential nomination, these judges are on the Court for
life and have the most important cases to deal with in their jurisdiction. Our current makeup of the
Supreme Court consists of Chief Justice, John G. Roberts, Jr., having

The Fourth Amendment And Fifth Amendment
The three amendments that are used to protect the rights of those accused of a crime include, the
Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment protects the right of people to be
secure in their persons, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. (Peak, 2015,
p.181). The Fifth Amendment protects the accused against self–incrimination, double jeopardy, and
life, liberty, and property. Meaning no person will be forced to be a witness against themselves, they
cannot be tried for the same offense twice, and their right to life, liberty, and property are protected
under the law. (Peak, 2015, p.193). The Sixth Amendment is the right to counsel. Any person who is
accused of a crime has the right to counsel for their defense, a speedy and public trial by an
impartial jury, to be informed of the nature of their crime which also includes Miranda rights, and to
be confronted with the witness against him/her while also having witnesses of their own. (Peak,
2015, p.195). These three Amendments in summary mean to me, that any person who is accused of a
crime is innocent until proven guilty and their rights are just as important as anyone else. They have
the natural born right to have their rights as citizens protected under the law, and ensure fair
treatment from law enforcement officers. In 1993, the Supreme Court ruled a decision on the court
case, Minnesota v. Dickerson. This court case is a following case of the original Terry v. Ohio in
1968, the

Kaiser Land Of The King 's Castle
A long time ago in a land far far away, a modest Man lives in a place named Kaiser Land. Kaiser
Land is the home of the King's castle that governs over the whole country. This man happens to live
in this castle with the royal family. The Man actually happens to be part of the royal family now. He
is engaged to the King's daughter, the Princess, sounds strange right? How they met is for another
time, but, an ordinary individual ends up falling in love with the Princess. It is just like every other
fantasy story. The date was the 19th of Morning Star (February in the fantasy world). It was a
wonderful, sunny and 75 degrees in Kaiser Land. The Man was walking through Kaiser land
running errands for the royal family while the Princess got all ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
As he was walking out of the castle, the King held up a legendary sword. The King gave the Man
the sword he used when he was a knight. The man started to think about where he would check first.
There were no leads to where the princess was being held captive. He decided to walk out towards
his old farm land to clear his mind before embarking on this magical journey. He then noticed
something strange on his walk. On the side of the street, there was a pile of dung from a foreign
creature to this part of the world. He knew this creature captured his fiance. He knew exactly where
to find this creature and slay him. The Man headed to the nearest travel center where he could find a
map. He grabbed a Valley Doo (past version of Mountain Dew), the map, and then started on his
adventure. The land of this creature is over two thousand miles away. The man wondered why he
had to walk this journey. Then he remembered, that is just the way it is in fantasy stories. On his first
day, he walked through a treacherous area. The map reads, "THE CANDY CANE FOREST." It was
snowing sugar, the Man hates too much sugar. That was not the only problem though, an enemy
tried to get in his way. The wicked toll booth. The man did not wanna go through, but he had too. So
he paid his two dollars and continued through. On this dangerous journey, the next place on the map
was named, "SOUTH PARK." As he entered the quiet mountain town, he met four fourth grade
boys. The boys were in a

The Fourth Of July : A Day Of Freedom
The Fourth of July is not only a day of founding but a day that symbolizes the sheer unwavering
freedom displayed in The United States. What is freedom? Who deserves this freedom? How does
one say that freedom is only assessable to a select few and denied to an entire population? Freedom
is described as "the power or right to act, speak or think as one wants without hindrance or
restraint." So how does a country that celebrates freedom every Fourth of July continue to deny
many of the most basic freedoms and rights to so many. The divide in The United States was the
main rift during the time that Fredrick Douglass was given the opportunity to speak on the Fourth of
July.
In his address, "What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?" Fredrick Douglass begins with praise for
the founding fathers, however, this acclaimed speech soon develops into an attack on the attitude
American's have taken in regard to slavery. It is important to note the place that Douglass
presumably escaped from in saying, "The fact is, ladies and gentlemen, the distance between this
platform and the slave plantation, from which I escaped, is considerable. (Douglass 50)." After
establishing his own background Douglass proceeds to compare the American Revolution and the
bondage Americans suffered to the current bondage and enslavement of African–Americans. This
comparison and many others promote the main project of Douglass's speech, his condemnation on
America for being fictitious to its so–called once

Supreme Court Case Brief
QADEER, MAHUM, Opinion of the Court SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Utah v
Strieff Argued: February 22, 2016 ––– Decided: TBD In Utah a Detective by the name of Douglas
Fackrell received a tip of the whereabouts of drug activity taking place. Fackrell over a course of
some days watched the house, where he concluded that there was in fact suspicious drug activity
taking place. The man who exited the house went by the name of Strieff, who the detective decided
to stop and question. By taking Streiff's I.D., Fackrell discovered a traffic warrant meant for Strieff.
Under this warrant, the detective then arrested Strieff, and then conducted a search on Strieff due to
the arrest. Due to this search, Fackrell found meth and a drug pipe inside ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
United States (1963) the Supreme Court found that the "evidence obtained following unlawful
police conduct may still be admissible," unless the evidence was not come about in a way of poor
conduct. However, this was found excusable if the evidence acquired post the rest was irrelevant to
the police conduct. In this case, Wong Sun wrote an unsigned confession, which was established to
not be the "fruit of the arrest." Therefore, the confession then was eligible to be used in trial. Toy,
another man under the suspicion of narcotics, was arrested under an unlawful warrant. The man was
searched by an unlawful warrant, this action becomes the "fruit of the arrest." Hence, this was not
permitted to be used in court as incriminating evidence. Similarly, in Utah v. Strieff, Strieff was
arrested for a traffic warrant, which was found through an unlawful stop. Subsequently, this issued
the search of Strieff's person. The precedent case demonstrates that the original arrest was for the
traffic warrant, this causes the warrant to be the "fruit of the arrest." The search proceeding the
arrest, found evidence that is not the "fruit of the arrest," and the exclusionary rule would be
exempted. Strieff argued that the unlawful stop was flagrant conduct, due to the Detective not
having reasonable suspicion. However, due to the fact that this was a high–crime neighborhood,
nearly seventy–five percent of those who resided in the area, had an outstanding warrant. With the
knowledge of this fact, Fackrell had a motive to make unlawful stops. Were most likely there would
be evidence to support his reason for the stop. Which leads to whether or not the exclusionary rule
would even

Themes In The Lion Makers By Vishnu Sharma
Title: The Lion Makers Author: Vishnu Sharma Literature of India Characters: The four Bhramas
Theme: Sensibility and friendship Point of view used in the text: First person point of view Plot
summary: There were four Bhramas ina certain town in India, they were all friends since childhood.
Three of them were really knowledgeable about the world, but lacked sense. While the other
Bhraman had nothing but only sense, he found scholarship distasteful . One day they talked about
the essence of their achievements and what to do with it, "We must travel and win the favor of kings
and earn money" one of the Bhraman said. All of them agreed on the idea. They journeyed. As they
went by and had gone a little way the first Bhraman, eldest Bhraman, said, "We can not win the
attention of the kings if we have the fourth here who has nothing but sense." The Second Bhraman
agreed and buttressed the first Bhraman's ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If you're older , it is expected that you must be followed or believed. That's how individuals view
people older than them, maybe beacause elders are embodied with great wisdoms, wisdoms which
were gained through experiences .One thing more, if you're older , you know better than the young
ones. This Bhraman indeed showed that age defines

The Pros And Cons Of The Fourth Amendment
One of the many freedoms we enjoy, as Americans is the right that protects us from unreasonable
search and seizures; as well as the necessity for a search warrant when law enforcement wishes to
search someone's property. This right is known as the Fourth Amendment and it contains two
clauses: the first one is the reasonableness clause, which states that we are protected from
unreasonable searches and seizures. The second part is the warrant clause, which states that a
warrant must be issued upon the finding of probable cause. It must then be supported by an
affirmation and particularly describing the place to be searched and what us intending to be found.
When referring to the fourth amendment the term person means the individual as a whole, both
internally as well as externally, if an arrest is made and the officer searches the pockets of a
suspected drug user in order to look for paraphernalia then it is a search of a person within in the
meaning of the fourth amendment. The fourth amendment not only protects the person, but also their
houses, papers, and effects from unreasonable search and seizure. When relating to a house the
fourth amendment protects ant domicile that the person is using whether their residence is temporary
or long–term. Papers can fall under any business records, letters, and diary entries, while effects is
anything else such as luggage, clothing, and vehicles. (Worrall 2016) A search as defined by Worrall
is an activity geared toward finding

Importance Of The Fourth Amendment
The fourth amendment was one of the first amendments to be created shortly after the United States
divided from Great Britain. The fourth amendment reads: "The Right of the people to be secure in
their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches or seizures, shall not be
violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation,
and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized" (The 4th
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution). During the late 18th century when this was created, the
United States had just separated from their long time rulers, Britain, who were known to give out
"general warrants" to officials to search civilians homes for unjustified reasons (Search and
Seizure). After the fourth amendment was established, citizens were finally given a sense of security
behind their own front doors. The fourth amendment is important to follow because it gives a person
the right to have their own privacy, avoids unnecessary searches, and provides safety and protection.
The fourth amendment plays a crucial role in each society's everyday lives because it ensures
privacy. Due to the fourth amendment, an officer is only allowed to search only if they have a search
warrant that is issued because of a probable cause. A search warrant is confirmed by a judge who is
able to give permission to search a vehicle, house, store, etc. "Searches and seizures that occur
without a warrant

Analysis Of Rashomon Effect
I was not surprised why this film was considered as one of the greatest film ever produced. The
movie was all about the witness of four people who gives a different story of a man's murdered and
the rape of his wife. The greatness of the film makes the journalist name an effect after it
"Rashomon effect." Rashomon effect is said to occur when the same event is given a contradictory
interpretation by a different individual involved.
The account of the four witnesses in this film is summarized below:
First witness (Tajomaru): The notorious bandit made a self–confession that he killed the murdered
man himself after raping the wife. He decided to rape the woman after being carried away by the
beauty but had no intention of killing the man. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The woman untied her husband and insist one of them need to die. They both fought and
Tajomaru eventually killed the man with a sword. The lady then ran away after the death of her
husband. Questions:
1. The fourth witness was telling the truth.
2. Even though he wasn't involved in the incident, his story totally summarized the other three
witness. His story was factual and he said to see from the incident how the three of them were
involved. His story comprised of all the other three stories and he disclosed the truth the other three
were hiding to cover themselves. For instance, Tajomaru refused to make mention that he begged
the woman to marry her or she will kill her, the woman refused to mention that
she insists one of the two men must die, the man refused to say he got into fight with Tajomaru but
the fourth witness was able to tell every part of the story.
3. I believed the fourth witness was real because his story involved all three–people involved in the
incidence. He saw the woman veil which was also mentioned by Tajomaru. The veil drop when
Tajomaru was running with the woman. He saw Tajomaru kneeling and begging the woman to
marry her and this was also said by the dead man. I wasn't confused about the dead man talking
through another medium. Many things might have transpired in between. How do we know if he
was the one really speaking? The dead has no ability to speak. The woman was filled with deceit
and her pitiful looks make

Mkt 421 Week 4 Advertising

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Kimberly Williams

More from Kimberly Williams (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Mkt 421 Week 4 Advertising