SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 21
Web Science & Technologies
                          University of Koblenz ▪ Landau, Germany



Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders
 on the Indexing Quality in Tagging Systems


                 Klaas Dellschaft
              klaasd@uni-koblenz.de

                    Steffen Staab
                staab@uni-koblenz.de
Collaborative Tagging Systems




 Objectives of tag recommenders:
   Improve indexing quality ⇒ retrieval results
   Reduce tagging effort
Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders                Slide 2 of 21
Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de)      http://west.uni-koblenz.de
Outline

 Measures of indexing quality
   What to understand under “indexing quality”?
   Inter-resource consistency ⇔ inter-indexer consistency

 Evaluation of the measures
    Are the measures correlated with each other?
    User study: Apply measures for two recommenders

 Evaluation results

 Conclusions


Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders                Slide 3 of 21
Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de)      http://west.uni-koblenz.de
Measures of
                                      Indexing Quality




Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders                Slide 4 of 21
Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de)      http://west.uni-koblenz.de
What does “indexing quality” mean?
                                              user perceived similarity




                                                                                              Resources
                             r1                          r2                            r3




                                                                                              describe
  science                 4                          0                            0




                                                                                              Tag Vectors
                                                                                   
   news                   10                         8                            0
  humor              v1 =                       v2 =                         v3 =  
                              0                           6                              9
                                                                                   
  patents                 0                          0                            5
                                                                                   


                                     sim(v1, v2)                    sim(v2, v3)

Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders                        Slide 5 of 21
Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de)              http://west.uni-koblenz.de
Measures of indexing quality

 Inter-resource consistency
    Compare resource similarity to the tag vector distance
    Requires external knowledge about similarity of resources
    Direct but sophisticated measure of indexing quality

 Inter-indexer consistency
    Do users agree on common description for a resource?
    Assumption: Users select tags independent of each other
    Indirect but easy measure of indexing quality


 Which measure to use for evaluating tag recommenders?


Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders                Slide 6 of 21
Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de)      http://west.uni-koblenz.de
Research Hypotheses

 Hypothesis: Inter-indexer consistency does not measure the
  influence of tag recommenders on the indexing quality!

 Popular Tags: Suggest most popular tags of a resource
    H1a: Popular Tags increase the inter-indexer consistency
    H1b: Popular Tags decrease the inter-resource consistency

 User Tags: Suggest all tags previously applied by the user
    H2a: User Tags lead to a decreased or unchanged inter-indexer

             consistency
       H2b: User Tags increase the inter-resource consistency

 The measures do not correlate when evaluating tag recommenders
Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders                Slide 7 of 21
Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de)      http://west.uni-koblenz.de
Measuring Inter-Resource Consistency
  Idea: Compare resource similarity and tag vector distance
      ai: Average distance to resources in the same cluster
      bi: Average distance to resources in the closest other cluster
                                           bi − ai
                                     si =
                                          max(ai , bi )
                                              resource




                                                 cluster of similar resources
        inconsistent                          consistent                    even more
-1                               0                                          consistent   +1
Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders                      Slide 8 of 21
Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de)            http://west.uni-koblenz.de
Measuring Inter-Indexer Consistency

   Idea: Do users agree on common description for a resource?
   Tag Reuse Rate
       Average number of users who apply a tag
       Used in the related work


    news                         8             8                     8
                                                                      
    humor                         4            6                      6
    fun                           2             2                     0
                                                                      
    patents                      0             0                      0
                                                                      

          Tag Reuse Rate:          4.7             5.3                      7


Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders                Slide 9 of 21
Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de)      http://west.uni-koblenz.de
Evaluation




Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders                   Slide 10 of 21
Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de)          http://west.uni-koblenz.de
Experimental Setup

 Objective:
    Are inter-resource and inter-indexer correlated if tag
     recommendations are given?

 Task given to users:
    Assign keywords to 10 web pages.
    After tagging, cluster web pages according to their
     similarity (⇒ inter-resource consistency).

 Three different experimental conditions:
    No Suggestions
    User Tags
    Popular Tags
 Further divided into an English and German user group
Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders               Slide 11 of 21
Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de)      http://west.uni-koblenz.de
Suggestion of Popular Tags – Screenshot




Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders               Slide 12 of 21
Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de)      http://west.uni-koblenz.de
Clustering of Similar Web Pages – Screenshot




Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders               Slide 13 of 21
Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de)      http://west.uni-koblenz.de
Results




Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders                   Slide 14 of 21
Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de)          http://west.uni-koblenz.de
Sizes of the Tagging Data Set

                German User Group:
                                       #Users   #Tags    #TAS         #TAS / #User
                  No Suggestions          74     706      2134            28.84
                  Popular Tags            78     531      2228            28.56
                  User Tags               79     466      1507            19.08




                English User Group:
                                       #Users   #Tags    #TAS         #TAS / #User
                  No Suggestions         115     973      3150            27.39
                  Popular Tags           118     550      3003            25.45
                  User Tags              118     819      2919            24.74




Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders                    Slide 15 of 21
Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de)           http://west.uni-koblenz.de
The Clustering Data Set

  In average, each user identified 4.59 clusters
  Overall, 146 distinct clusters have been identified
  11 most frequent clusters ⇒ 70% of the data




  The web pages cover ~7 topics
  3 web pages are on the border between two topics
Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders               Slide 16 of 21
Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de)      http://west.uni-koblenz.de
Differences in the Topical Clusters


               Cluster probabilities in English experiment

                                                        No Suggestions
                                                        Popular Tags
                                                        User Tags




                              The Onion + BBC         The Onion + Patents
                              ⇒ News                  ⇒ Humor


       English Popular Tags condition has to be excluded
Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders                 Slide 17 of 21
Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de)        http://west.uni-koblenz.de
Measuring the Inter-Resource Consistency

 H1a: Popular Tags decrease the inter-resource consistency
 H2a: User Tags increase the inter-resource consistency

 Expectation:                            E(spt,i) <        E(sns,i) < E(sut,i)
                                                                                             
                                          E(spt,i)           E(sns,i)             E(sut,i)
       German Users                      0.1474             0.1847                0.2367
       English Users                          N/A           0.1713                0.1915

      (All differences are significant!)

Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders                      Slide 18 of 21
Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de)             http://west.uni-koblenz.de
Measuring the Inter-Indexer Consistency

 H1b: Popular Tags increase the inter-indexer consistency
 H2b: User Tags lead to a decreased or unchanged
       inter-indexer consistency

 Expectation:                            E(trpt,i) >        E(trns,i) ≥ E(trut,i)
                                                                                               
                                          E(trpt,i)           E(trns,i)            E(trut,i)
        German Users                          3.60              2.44               2.39*
        English Users                         4.67              2.76               2.68*


       * Differences between E(trns,i) and E(trut,i) not significant

Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders                       Slide 19 of 21
Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de)              http://west.uni-koblenz.de
Conclusions
 Measures of indexing quality
   Inter-resource consistency
   Inter-indexer consistency
   Measures do not correlate if recommendations are given
   Only inter-resource consistency can be used

 Popular Tags
    Do not lead to consistent descriptions across resources
    Are rather counterproductive for indexing resources

 User Tags
    Lead to consistent descriptions across resource
    Consolidate the personomy of users

Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders               Slide 20 of 21
Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de)      http://west.uni-koblenz.de
Paper:
K. Dellschaft & S. Staab. Measuring the Influence of Tag
   Recommenders on the Indexing Quality in Tagging Systems.
   Proceedings of the Hypertext Conference, 2012
   http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2310009


Experimental Interface:
http://userpages.uni-koblenz.de/~klaasd/experiment/



Data Set:
http://west.uni-koblenz.de/Research/DataSets/tagging-experiment/

Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders               Slide 21 of 21
Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de)      http://west.uni-koblenz.de

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Akka Presentation Schule@synyx
Akka Presentation Schule@synyxAkka Presentation Schule@synyx
Akka Presentation Schule@synyxFlorian Hopf
 
Wo tcommunity proposal
Wo tcommunity proposalWo tcommunity proposal
Wo tcommunity proposalCampus Tang
 
Representation theory
Representation theoryRepresentation theory
Representation theorycharwolfefilm
 
33d Infantry Brigade Crosswire Issue 4
33d Infantry Brigade Crosswire Issue 433d Infantry Brigade Crosswire Issue 4
33d Infantry Brigade Crosswire Issue 433rdibctpao
 
33d Infantry Brigade Crosswire Issue 6
33d Infantry Brigade Crosswire Issue 633d Infantry Brigade Crosswire Issue 6
33d Infantry Brigade Crosswire Issue 633rdibctpao
 
Social pres
Social presSocial pres
Social presadshock
 
A68f gout final
A68f gout final A68f gout final
A68f gout final eswar639
 
22. TCI Climate of the Nation Flagship Report 2012
22. TCI Climate of the Nation Flagship Report 201222. TCI Climate of the Nation Flagship Report 2012
22. TCI Climate of the Nation Flagship Report 2012Richard Plumpton
 
Creation 101109231427-phpapp02
Creation 101109231427-phpapp02Creation 101109231427-phpapp02
Creation 101109231427-phpapp02beckyboks
 
Business Opportunity Presentation
Business Opportunity PresentationBusiness Opportunity Presentation
Business Opportunity Presentationporkyhawkins
 
TCI_DangerousDegrees_print
TCI_DangerousDegrees_printTCI_DangerousDegrees_print
TCI_DangerousDegrees_printRichard Plumpton
 
English project (aviral gupta)
English project (aviral gupta)English project (aviral gupta)
English project (aviral gupta)aviralgupta14
 
A Decade of Crying Mothers
A Decade of Crying MothersA Decade of Crying Mothers
A Decade of Crying MothersDr Nahin Mamun
 

Viewers also liked (15)

Akka Presentation Schule@synyx
Akka Presentation Schule@synyxAkka Presentation Schule@synyx
Akka Presentation Schule@synyx
 
Wo tcommunity proposal
Wo tcommunity proposalWo tcommunity proposal
Wo tcommunity proposal
 
Representation theory
Representation theoryRepresentation theory
Representation theory
 
33d Infantry Brigade Crosswire Issue 4
33d Infantry Brigade Crosswire Issue 433d Infantry Brigade Crosswire Issue 4
33d Infantry Brigade Crosswire Issue 4
 
33d Infantry Brigade Crosswire Issue 6
33d Infantry Brigade Crosswire Issue 633d Infantry Brigade Crosswire Issue 6
33d Infantry Brigade Crosswire Issue 6
 
Social pres
Social presSocial pres
Social pres
 
A68f gout final
A68f gout final A68f gout final
A68f gout final
 
Questionnair1 (1)
Questionnair1 (1)Questionnair1 (1)
Questionnair1 (1)
 
22. TCI Climate of the Nation Flagship Report 2012
22. TCI Climate of the Nation Flagship Report 201222. TCI Climate of the Nation Flagship Report 2012
22. TCI Climate of the Nation Flagship Report 2012
 
Creation 101109231427-phpapp02
Creation 101109231427-phpapp02Creation 101109231427-phpapp02
Creation 101109231427-phpapp02
 
Business Opportunity Presentation
Business Opportunity PresentationBusiness Opportunity Presentation
Business Opportunity Presentation
 
TCI_DangerousDegrees_print
TCI_DangerousDegrees_printTCI_DangerousDegrees_print
TCI_DangerousDegrees_print
 
Webvisions ny
Webvisions nyWebvisions ny
Webvisions ny
 
English project (aviral gupta)
English project (aviral gupta)English project (aviral gupta)
English project (aviral gupta)
 
A Decade of Crying Mothers
A Decade of Crying MothersA Decade of Crying Mothers
A Decade of Crying Mothers
 

Similar to Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders on the Indexing Quality in Tagging Systems

Removing Barriers to Data Sharing: the Research Data Alliance
Removing Barriers to Data Sharing: the Research Data AllianceRemoving Barriers to Data Sharing: the Research Data Alliance
Removing Barriers to Data Sharing: the Research Data AllianceResearch Data Alliance
 
Connecting Products, Publications and People - David Kavanagh
Connecting Products, Publications and People - David KavanaghConnecting Products, Publications and People - David Kavanagh
Connecting Products, Publications and People - David KavanaghIncisive_Events
 
PhD defense : Multi-points of view semantic enrichment of folksonomies
PhD defense : Multi-points of view semantic enrichment of folksonomiesPhD defense : Multi-points of view semantic enrichment of folksonomies
PhD defense : Multi-points of view semantic enrichment of folksonomiesFreddy Limpens
 
AFEL: Imbalance of Tag Recommendations
AFEL: Imbalance of Tag RecommendationsAFEL: Imbalance of Tag Recommendations
AFEL: Imbalance of Tag RecommendationsDominik Kowald
 
Expertise in Software Development
Expertise in Software DevelopmentExpertise in Software Development
Expertise in Software DevelopmentQAware GmbH
 
discopen
discopendiscopen
discopenJisc
 
Software archiecture lecture09
Software archiecture   lecture09Software archiecture   lecture09
Software archiecture lecture09Luktalja
 
"We are doing it wrong."
"We are doing it wrong.""We are doing it wrong."
"We are doing it wrong."weissgraeber
 
Software Architecture Erosion and Modernization
Software Architecture Erosion and ModernizationSoftware Architecture Erosion and Modernization
Software Architecture Erosion and Modernizationbmerkle
 
mm-ADT: A Virtual Machine/An Economic Machine
mm-ADT: A Virtual Machine/An Economic Machinemm-ADT: A Virtual Machine/An Economic Machine
mm-ADT: A Virtual Machine/An Economic MachineMarko Rodriguez
 
apidays LIVE Australia 2021 - Tracing across your distributed process boundar...
apidays LIVE Australia 2021 - Tracing across your distributed process boundar...apidays LIVE Australia 2021 - Tracing across your distributed process boundar...
apidays LIVE Australia 2021 - Tracing across your distributed process boundar...apidays
 
Tag And Tag Based Recommender
Tag And Tag Based RecommenderTag And Tag Based Recommender
Tag And Tag Based Recommendergu wendong
 
Business Applications of Predictive Modeling at Scale - KDD 2016 Tutorial
Business Applications of Predictive Modeling at Scale - KDD 2016 TutorialBusiness Applications of Predictive Modeling at Scale - KDD 2016 Tutorial
Business Applications of Predictive Modeling at Scale - KDD 2016 TutorialQiang Zhu
 
LCI report-Demo
LCI report-DemoLCI report-Demo
LCI report-DemoMo Mamouei
 
aRangodb, un package per l'utilizzo di ArangoDB con R
aRangodb, un package per l'utilizzo di ArangoDB con RaRangodb, un package per l'utilizzo di ArangoDB con R
aRangodb, un package per l'utilizzo di ArangoDB con RGraphRM
 
Overview of the altmetrics landscape
Overview of the altmetrics landscapeOverview of the altmetrics landscape
Overview of the altmetrics landscapeRichard Cave
 
R Tool for Visual Studio และการทำงานร่วมกันเป็นทีม โดย เฉลิมวงศ์ วิจิตรปิยะกุ...
R Tool for Visual Studio และการทำงานร่วมกันเป็นทีม โดย เฉลิมวงศ์ วิจิตรปิยะกุ...R Tool for Visual Studio และการทำงานร่วมกันเป็นทีม โดย เฉลิมวงศ์ วิจิตรปิยะกุ...
R Tool for Visual Studio และการทำงานร่วมกันเป็นทีม โดย เฉลิมวงศ์ วิจิตรปิยะกุ...BAINIDA
 

Similar to Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders on the Indexing Quality in Tagging Systems (20)

Removing Barriers to Data Sharing: the Research Data Alliance
Removing Barriers to Data Sharing: the Research Data AllianceRemoving Barriers to Data Sharing: the Research Data Alliance
Removing Barriers to Data Sharing: the Research Data Alliance
 
Workshop – UI audit of Mall.cz – May 2019, Brno
Workshop – UI audit of Mall.cz – May 2019, BrnoWorkshop – UI audit of Mall.cz – May 2019, Brno
Workshop – UI audit of Mall.cz – May 2019, Brno
 
Connecting Products, Publications and People - David Kavanagh
Connecting Products, Publications and People - David KavanaghConnecting Products, Publications and People - David Kavanagh
Connecting Products, Publications and People - David Kavanagh
 
PhD defense : Multi-points of view semantic enrichment of folksonomies
PhD defense : Multi-points of view semantic enrichment of folksonomiesPhD defense : Multi-points of view semantic enrichment of folksonomies
PhD defense : Multi-points of view semantic enrichment of folksonomies
 
AFEL: Imbalance of Tag Recommendations
AFEL: Imbalance of Tag RecommendationsAFEL: Imbalance of Tag Recommendations
AFEL: Imbalance of Tag Recommendations
 
Expertise in Software Development
Expertise in Software DevelopmentExpertise in Software Development
Expertise in Software Development
 
discopen
discopendiscopen
discopen
 
Software archiecture lecture09
Software archiecture   lecture09Software archiecture   lecture09
Software archiecture lecture09
 
"We are doing it wrong."
"We are doing it wrong.""We are doing it wrong."
"We are doing it wrong."
 
Software Architecture Erosion and Modernization
Software Architecture Erosion and ModernizationSoftware Architecture Erosion and Modernization
Software Architecture Erosion and Modernization
 
mm-ADT: A Virtual Machine/An Economic Machine
mm-ADT: A Virtual Machine/An Economic Machinemm-ADT: A Virtual Machine/An Economic Machine
mm-ADT: A Virtual Machine/An Economic Machine
 
ON.LAB Community
ON.LAB CommunityON.LAB Community
ON.LAB Community
 
apidays LIVE Australia 2021 - Tracing across your distributed process boundar...
apidays LIVE Australia 2021 - Tracing across your distributed process boundar...apidays LIVE Australia 2021 - Tracing across your distributed process boundar...
apidays LIVE Australia 2021 - Tracing across your distributed process boundar...
 
Tag And Tag Based Recommender
Tag And Tag Based RecommenderTag And Tag Based Recommender
Tag And Tag Based Recommender
 
Business Applications of Predictive Modeling at Scale - KDD 2016 Tutorial
Business Applications of Predictive Modeling at Scale - KDD 2016 TutorialBusiness Applications of Predictive Modeling at Scale - KDD 2016 Tutorial
Business Applications of Predictive Modeling at Scale - KDD 2016 Tutorial
 
EDR8204-7
EDR8204-7EDR8204-7
EDR8204-7
 
LCI report-Demo
LCI report-DemoLCI report-Demo
LCI report-Demo
 
aRangodb, un package per l'utilizzo di ArangoDB con R
aRangodb, un package per l'utilizzo di ArangoDB con RaRangodb, un package per l'utilizzo di ArangoDB con R
aRangodb, un package per l'utilizzo di ArangoDB con R
 
Overview of the altmetrics landscape
Overview of the altmetrics landscapeOverview of the altmetrics landscape
Overview of the altmetrics landscape
 
R Tool for Visual Studio และการทำงานร่วมกันเป็นทีม โดย เฉลิมวงศ์ วิจิตรปิยะกุ...
R Tool for Visual Studio และการทำงานร่วมกันเป็นทีม โดย เฉลิมวงศ์ วิจิตรปิยะกุ...R Tool for Visual Studio และการทำงานร่วมกันเป็นทีม โดย เฉลิมวงศ์ วิจิตรปิยะกุ...
R Tool for Visual Studio และการทำงานร่วมกันเป็นทีม โดย เฉลิมวงศ์ วิจิตรปิยะกุ...
 

Recently uploaded

INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptxINTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptxHumphrey A Beña
 
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdfLike-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdfMr Bounab Samir
 
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...JhezDiaz1
 
How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17
How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17
How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17Celine George
 
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY - GERBNER.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY -  GERBNER.pptxAUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY -  GERBNER.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY - GERBNER.pptxiammrhaywood
 
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptxBarangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptxCarlos105
 
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdfAMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdfphamnguyenenglishnb
 
Science 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptx
Science 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptxScience 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptx
Science 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptxMaryGraceBautista27
 
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdfGrade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdfJemuel Francisco
 
THEORIES OF ORGANIZATION-PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
THEORIES OF ORGANIZATION-PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONTHEORIES OF ORGANIZATION-PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
THEORIES OF ORGANIZATION-PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONHumphrey A Beña
 
ACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdf
ACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdfACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdf
ACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdfSpandanaRallapalli
 
Virtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdf
Virtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdfVirtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdf
Virtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdfErwinPantujan2
 
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)lakshayb543
 
Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)
Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)
Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)Mark Reed
 
Global Lehigh Strategic Initiatives (without descriptions)
Global Lehigh Strategic Initiatives (without descriptions)Global Lehigh Strategic Initiatives (without descriptions)
Global Lehigh Strategic Initiatives (without descriptions)cama23
 
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choomENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choomnelietumpap1
 

Recently uploaded (20)

INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptxINTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
 
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdfLike-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
 
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
 
FINALS_OF_LEFT_ON_C'N_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
FINALS_OF_LEFT_ON_C'N_EL_DORADO_2024.pptxFINALS_OF_LEFT_ON_C'N_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
FINALS_OF_LEFT_ON_C'N_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
 
How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17
How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17
How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17
 
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY - GERBNER.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY -  GERBNER.pptxAUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY -  GERBNER.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY - GERBNER.pptx
 
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptxBarangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
 
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdfAMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
 
Science 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptx
Science 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptxScience 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptx
Science 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptx
 
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdfGrade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
Grade 9 Quarter 4 Dll Grade 9 Quarter 4 DLL.pdf
 
LEFT_ON_C'N_ PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
LEFT_ON_C'N_ PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptxLEFT_ON_C'N_ PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
LEFT_ON_C'N_ PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
 
THEORIES OF ORGANIZATION-PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
THEORIES OF ORGANIZATION-PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONTHEORIES OF ORGANIZATION-PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
THEORIES OF ORGANIZATION-PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
 
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptxRaw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
 
ACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdf
ACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdfACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdf
ACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdf
 
Virtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdf
Virtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdfVirtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdf
Virtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdf
 
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
 
Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)
Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)
Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)
 
Global Lehigh Strategic Initiatives (without descriptions)
Global Lehigh Strategic Initiatives (without descriptions)Global Lehigh Strategic Initiatives (without descriptions)
Global Lehigh Strategic Initiatives (without descriptions)
 
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choomENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
 

Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders on the Indexing Quality in Tagging Systems

  • 1. Web Science & Technologies University of Koblenz ▪ Landau, Germany Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders on the Indexing Quality in Tagging Systems Klaas Dellschaft klaasd@uni-koblenz.de Steffen Staab staab@uni-koblenz.de
  • 2. Collaborative Tagging Systems  Objectives of tag recommenders:  Improve indexing quality ⇒ retrieval results  Reduce tagging effort Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders Slide 2 of 21 Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de) http://west.uni-koblenz.de
  • 3. Outline  Measures of indexing quality  What to understand under “indexing quality”?  Inter-resource consistency ⇔ inter-indexer consistency  Evaluation of the measures  Are the measures correlated with each other?  User study: Apply measures for two recommenders  Evaluation results  Conclusions Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders Slide 3 of 21 Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de) http://west.uni-koblenz.de
  • 4. Measures of Indexing Quality Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders Slide 4 of 21 Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de) http://west.uni-koblenz.de
  • 5. What does “indexing quality” mean? user perceived similarity Resources r1 r2 r3 describe  science  4 0 0 Tag Vectors          news  10  8 0  humor  v1 =   v2 =   v3 =   0 6 9          patents  0 0 5         sim(v1, v2) sim(v2, v3) Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders Slide 5 of 21 Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de) http://west.uni-koblenz.de
  • 6. Measures of indexing quality  Inter-resource consistency  Compare resource similarity to the tag vector distance  Requires external knowledge about similarity of resources  Direct but sophisticated measure of indexing quality  Inter-indexer consistency  Do users agree on common description for a resource?  Assumption: Users select tags independent of each other  Indirect but easy measure of indexing quality  Which measure to use for evaluating tag recommenders? Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders Slide 6 of 21 Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de) http://west.uni-koblenz.de
  • 7. Research Hypotheses  Hypothesis: Inter-indexer consistency does not measure the influence of tag recommenders on the indexing quality!  Popular Tags: Suggest most popular tags of a resource  H1a: Popular Tags increase the inter-indexer consistency  H1b: Popular Tags decrease the inter-resource consistency  User Tags: Suggest all tags previously applied by the user  H2a: User Tags lead to a decreased or unchanged inter-indexer consistency  H2b: User Tags increase the inter-resource consistency  The measures do not correlate when evaluating tag recommenders Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders Slide 7 of 21 Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de) http://west.uni-koblenz.de
  • 8. Measuring Inter-Resource Consistency  Idea: Compare resource similarity and tag vector distance  ai: Average distance to resources in the same cluster  bi: Average distance to resources in the closest other cluster bi − ai si = max(ai , bi ) resource cluster of similar resources inconsistent consistent even more -1 0 consistent +1 Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders Slide 8 of 21 Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de) http://west.uni-koblenz.de
  • 9. Measuring Inter-Indexer Consistency Idea: Do users agree on common description for a resource? Tag Reuse Rate  Average number of users who apply a tag  Used in the related work  news  8 8 8          humor   4 6  6  fun   2  2  0          patents  0 0  0         Tag Reuse Rate: 4.7 5.3 7 Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders Slide 9 of 21 Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de) http://west.uni-koblenz.de
  • 10. Evaluation Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders Slide 10 of 21 Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de) http://west.uni-koblenz.de
  • 11. Experimental Setup  Objective:  Are inter-resource and inter-indexer correlated if tag recommendations are given?  Task given to users:  Assign keywords to 10 web pages.  After tagging, cluster web pages according to their similarity (⇒ inter-resource consistency).  Three different experimental conditions:  No Suggestions  User Tags  Popular Tags  Further divided into an English and German user group Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders Slide 11 of 21 Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de) http://west.uni-koblenz.de
  • 12. Suggestion of Popular Tags – Screenshot Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders Slide 12 of 21 Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de) http://west.uni-koblenz.de
  • 13. Clustering of Similar Web Pages – Screenshot Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders Slide 13 of 21 Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de) http://west.uni-koblenz.de
  • 14. Results Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders Slide 14 of 21 Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de) http://west.uni-koblenz.de
  • 15. Sizes of the Tagging Data Set German User Group: #Users #Tags #TAS #TAS / #User No Suggestions 74 706 2134 28.84 Popular Tags 78 531 2228 28.56 User Tags 79 466 1507 19.08 English User Group: #Users #Tags #TAS #TAS / #User No Suggestions 115 973 3150 27.39 Popular Tags 118 550 3003 25.45 User Tags 118 819 2919 24.74 Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders Slide 15 of 21 Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de) http://west.uni-koblenz.de
  • 16. The Clustering Data Set  In average, each user identified 4.59 clusters  Overall, 146 distinct clusters have been identified  11 most frequent clusters ⇒ 70% of the data  The web pages cover ~7 topics  3 web pages are on the border between two topics Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders Slide 16 of 21 Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de) http://west.uni-koblenz.de
  • 17. Differences in the Topical Clusters Cluster probabilities in English experiment No Suggestions Popular Tags User Tags The Onion + BBC The Onion + Patents ⇒ News ⇒ Humor  English Popular Tags condition has to be excluded Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders Slide 17 of 21 Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de) http://west.uni-koblenz.de
  • 18. Measuring the Inter-Resource Consistency  H1a: Popular Tags decrease the inter-resource consistency  H2a: User Tags increase the inter-resource consistency  Expectation: E(spt,i) < E(sns,i) < E(sut,i)  E(spt,i) E(sns,i) E(sut,i) German Users 0.1474 0.1847 0.2367 English Users N/A 0.1713 0.1915 (All differences are significant!) Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders Slide 18 of 21 Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de) http://west.uni-koblenz.de
  • 19. Measuring the Inter-Indexer Consistency  H1b: Popular Tags increase the inter-indexer consistency  H2b: User Tags lead to a decreased or unchanged inter-indexer consistency  Expectation: E(trpt,i) > E(trns,i) ≥ E(trut,i)  E(trpt,i) E(trns,i) E(trut,i) German Users 3.60 2.44 2.39* English Users 4.67 2.76 2.68* * Differences between E(trns,i) and E(trut,i) not significant Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders Slide 19 of 21 Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de) http://west.uni-koblenz.de
  • 20. Conclusions  Measures of indexing quality  Inter-resource consistency  Inter-indexer consistency  Measures do not correlate if recommendations are given  Only inter-resource consistency can be used  Popular Tags  Do not lead to consistent descriptions across resources  Are rather counterproductive for indexing resources  User Tags  Lead to consistent descriptions across resource  Consolidate the personomy of users Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders Slide 20 of 21 Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de) http://west.uni-koblenz.de
  • 21. Paper: K. Dellschaft & S. Staab. Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders on the Indexing Quality in Tagging Systems. Proceedings of the Hypertext Conference, 2012 http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2310009 Experimental Interface: http://userpages.uni-koblenz.de/~klaasd/experiment/ Data Set: http://west.uni-koblenz.de/Research/DataSets/tagging-experiment/ Measuring the Influence of Tag Recommenders Slide 21 of 21 Klaas Dellschaft (klaasd@uni-koblenz.de) http://west.uni-koblenz.de