Analysis for design

Analysis for Design
Evaluating game system behavior
Petri Lankoski Södertörn University

How Is Your Probability Math?
Dice
 Probability of 1d6 to get 6?
 1/6
 Probability of 1d6 to get 6 after
previous was 6?
 1/6
 Probability of 2d6 to get double
6?
 1/36
 Probability of 2d6 sum is 7?
 6/36 (6 cases where the sum is
7 out of 36 possibilities)
Cards
 Probability to draw an ace?
 4/52
 Probability to draw second ace after
an ace?
 3/51
 Probability to draw an ace if the first
was not an ace?
 4/51
 Draw a card and put it face down.
What is the probability the the second
card is an ace?
 4/52*3/51 (both aces) + 48/52*4/51
(first not ace, second is ace)

Sum of Dice, 2d6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Sum Prob
2 1/36
3 2/36
4 3/36
5 4/36
6 5/36
7 6/36
8 5/36
9 4/36
10 3/36
11 2/36
12 1/36
3 fours

Dice vs Cards
 History does not influence probabilities of dice
 Drawing a card influence probabilities of next
drawn card
 Shuffling resets
 Very handy to get certain kind of results
 Catan: all boards have 4 hex producing wood
and 3 producing stone and so on
 Both can be simulated using pseudo-random
numbers

More about randomness
 Salen & Zimmerman, 2004. Rules of play.
 Game as systems of uncertainty, pp.173–188.
 Elias, Garfield & Gutschera, 2012. Characteristics
of games.
 Indeterminacy, pp. 137–166

A Skill System
skilld10 vs difficulty example

Skill check using Xd10
 Throw skilld10
 Success if at least one die over difficulty
 If throw is 1 reduce one success
 If negative amount of success skill check is
fumble
 Is this good?

10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
2 4 6 8
diff
success
skill
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0
10000
20000
30000
2 4 6 8
diff
fail
skill
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0
2500
5000
7500
10000
2 4 6 8
diff
fumble
skill
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

What we learned
 System works OK in most cases
 Skill level 1 and 2 differently to other levels
 High difficulties are significantly less likely to fumble
with skill level 1 than with high skills; skill level 2 less
anomaly, but still very different
 Skill levels 1 and 2 are less likely to success in most
cases
 But behaves differently than other skill levels
 One possible fix:
 No skill rolls use 1 or 2 dice

Trouble
A simple example
Image: Wikipedia

Trouble
 How long (rounds & minutes ) in average game
takes?
 Ignore returning home by landing on them, on
board with with 6 and home with only correct roll

Answer: Trouble
 Expected value: long run average
 D6: expected value = 3.5 (1+6/2), but…
 However, the Trouble die expected value is 4
 Simulated the die 50000 times and calculated
average
 Track length: 32, 31, 30, 29
 Game time estimate (underestimates)
 Average rounds to complete
 32 / 4 + 31 / 4 + 30 / 4 + 29 / 4 = 30.5 rounds
 Turn: 15 sec -> round: 1 min -> game: 30.5 * 1 min ~30
min
 But return home rule makes game more unpredictable

Balance
 Is game balanced?
 How game is balanced?

Answer: Balance
 Game is symmetrical
⇒balanced
 Except:
 1st (and so on) player has a small advantage over
next ones
 However, amount of rounds and return to home
mechanism is likely to reduce the advantage

Assignment
Island Tour

Game
Rules
 D6 to move
 Winner is the one who visit all
listed squares first (see the
column on the right hand
side)
 Must stop to a site
 All players start at START
 In one lands to red place,
one looses ones next turn
 Board in next slide
Goals
 Player 1 visits
 1, 6, 9, 15, 20, 32
 Player 2 visits
 4, 10, 13, 18, 27, 30
 Player 3 visits
 7, 8, 11, 15, 22, 29
 Player 4 visits
 5, 10, 11, 21, 23, 26
Petri Lankoski Södertörn University Assignment is based on Korkeasaari board game

Board
Letters are marking junctions

Island Tour
 Estimate how much time game takes
 How would you balance the game if it is not
balanced?
 Do not change core mechanics
 Racing with die
 Asymmetric

Answers: Island Tour
Length Wait a
round
squares
Obl. wait
a round
squares
Expected
time
(rounds)
Player 1 69 5 1 20.8
Player 2 72 3 0 20.6
Player 3 79 7 0 22.7
Player 4 70 4 0 20.1
Estimated time = length / 3.5 + wait a round / length + obl. wait a round
Probability to land

Answers: Island Tour
 Player 3 has longer / harder path
 Easy fix: shorten the path
 E.g. 7, 8, 15, 22, 28, 31

Simulation
 How the players gain resources
 Simplified
 Robber vs no robber discard
 Only resource amount simulated, not types
 Assumptions
 Four player game
 0-3 resources at hand when ones turn starts
 Model for using resources; not able to use all resources
 Better robber simulation
 One specific board set-up
 The results does not vary much board to board
 The results can vary with not optimal settlement placements
 50 000 iterations used

Simulation set-up
• 2 victory point set-up

Model
#!/usr/bin/python
import random
from collections import Counter
# board model (2 victory points)
field1 = {
2: {'white': 0, 'blue':0, 'red': 0, 'orange': 0},
12: {'white': 0, 'blue':0, 'red': 0, 'orange': 0}
}
 The above model does not contain handling for
robber
 The code for simulating this model is bit more
complicated

Startposition
comparison
Petri Lankoski Södertörn University Dark blue: 50%, light blue: 80%
4
5 5
6
0 0
1 11
2 2
3
3 3
4
5
2.05356
2.60712
3.16662
3.72224
0
2
4
6
0 1 2 3
Turn
Resources White
4
5
6
7
0 0
1 11
2 2
3
3
4 4
5
2.08214
2.6593
3.2414
3.81416
0
2
4
6
0 1 2 3
Turn
Resources
Blue
4
5 5
6
0 0
1
2
1
2 2
3
3
4 4
5
2.08276
2.66588
3.24844
3.83248
0
2
4
6
0 1 2 3
Turn
Resources
Orange
4
5 5
6
0 0
1
2
1
2 2
3
3
4 4
5
2.07952
2.66072
3.2421
3.82596
0
2
4
6
0 1 2 3
Turn
Resources Red

What this mean?

What this mean?
 Rather well-balanced starting positions
 No advantage/disadvantage for any color
 White slightly lower average resource gain
 But have a port
 Blue slightly have more variation in resource gain
(80% area is wider)

Impactofsetup

Impactofsetup
3
4
5 5
0 0
1 11 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
1.89398
2.28342
2.67204
3.06254
0
2
4
6
0 1 2 3
Turn
Resources
White, bad
3
4
5 5
0 0 0 0
1 1 1
2
3 3 3
4
1.8087
2.11382
2.42424
2.72642
0
2
4
6
0 1 2 3
Turn
Resources
White, bad alt 2
4
5 5
6
0 0
1
2
1
2 2
3
3
4 4
5
2.08718
2.67596
3.26016
3.84286
0
2
4
6
0 1 2 3
Turn
Resources
White, good alt
4
5 5
6
0 0
1 11
2 2
3
3 3
4
5
2.05356
2.60712
3.16662
3.72224
0
2
4
6
0 1 2 3
Turn
Resources
White

What this mean?
 Initial placement of ones settlement is important
 Rather big impact on resource gain
 Even bigger after upgrading settlements to cities

Feedback loop & Roll 7
Effect?
Scenario
• Only white
simulated
• White built cities
in all places
marked

Feedbackloop&roll
“7”effect
6
11
12
14
1 1
2
3
2
3
4
64
6
8
10
3.28772
5.07054
6.68098
8.11302
0
5
10
15
0 1 2 3
Turn
Resources Robber=Default
6
11
13
15
1 1
2
3
2
3
4
64
6
8
11
3.2899
5.0725
6.85024
8.62992
0
5
10
15
0 1 2 3
Turn
Resources
Robber=No
6
11
12
14
1 1
2 22
3
4
5
4
6
8
10
3.27528
5.04646
6.527
7.68936
0
5
10
15
0 1 2 3
Turn
Resources
Robber=To zero
6
11
12
14
1 1
2
3
2
3
4
5
4
6
8
10
3.29602
5.0909
6.50472
7.7635
0
5
10
15
0 1 2 3
Turn
Resources Robber=Limit 4 & half

What this mean?
 Feedback loop is weakened by the board design
 There is no equally good places to build after initial
setup
 Robber (rolling 7) makes lucky streaks rarer
 Not big effect on positive feedback look on average
 What if scenarios
 Robber -> discard all
 Discard if more than four resources

Monopoly

Board & Movement
Chance to end
Up In a square
1/40 = 2,50%?
3 doubles
in a row
1/16 Card takes
to Jail
A player can
increase
probability to
land to
These squares
(out with doubles)

Chance to Land at a
Square

Break Even Times

What we learned
 Staying in prison strategy alters changes to land
other squares
 Long prison stay good at the end game
 Break even time downward trend is good
 Breakeven times are long
 Slow start
 Note that one cannot build before owning all
squares with that color

Forbidden Island

Rules in brief
 Randomly generated boar,
 Treasure deck (28 cards)
 4 treasure cards are needed to
collect a certain (1/4) treasure
from specific tile
 Water rise! (3) cards increase
speed which the island is going
under water
 Flood cards
 Tells which tile will be flooded
or sink
 Players has three actions
 Support a tile
 Move
 Give a treasure card
 Capture a treasure
 Win by collecting all four treasures
and escape by helicopter
 Loose by
 Water level raises too high (with
Water Rise! Cards)
 Cannot collect the treasures
because of sunken tile
 Cannot escape because of
the exit tile is sunken

Game length (loose with
water level)
 3 water raises cards in treasure cards deck (28
cards)

Game length (loose with
water level)
Loose cond.:
N water rise!
Deck
exhausted N
times
Ends with
Nth water
rise! card
Novice 9 2 3
Normal 8 2 2
Elite 7 2 1
Legendary 6 1 3
Rough estimate about play time in terms of water rise!
cards

2 players, normal
Water
Level
Min turn Max turn Mean
turn
# act. /
support
Actions -
# actions
1 1 10 2.7 2 2
2 1 11 4.8 2 2
3 1 11 7.3 3 1
4 2 19 11.4 3 1
5 13 20 15.5 3 1
6 13 20 17.4 4 0
7 14 28 21.0 4 0
8 22 29 24.5 5 -1
9 22 29 26.4 5 -1

Prevent island sinking
 Water levels 1 & 2: possible to support squares most of the
time
 Water levels 3–5: possible to support nearby squares if actions
are focused to that
 Spending max 1 point to movement
 Water levels 6-7: Not possible to support all squares except
with luck
 No movement possible if supporting four squares
 Water level 8: island is sinking no matter what
 Note: Digging up a treasure requires an action and moving to
the correct square
 To keep the island in stable state would require more actions

Treasure cards
 4 same treasure card is needed to dig up a
treasure
 5 same treasure cards in deck
 Discarding correct cards is critical (max hand
size: 5 cards)
 Treasure card scuffle is needed if discarding 2 same
resources before the set can be completed

Summary

Balance
 Symmetry typically leads to balance
 Note: turn order / some typically start in board games
 Creates imbalance
 Catan solution to balance set-up
 turn order in setup: 1-2-3-4-4-3-2-1
 Symmetry can be also in form of rock-paper-scissors
 Balancing weapons & troops
 non-symmetrical things are harder to balance
 Difficulty in co-op games:
 resources needed to keep status quo or
 to progress vs resources available

Simulations
 Game systems with random component are
complex to predict
 Card-based are even history-dependent
 How many / what cards are played influence
probabilities
 Simulations can help to understand how a part of
the system behaves
 One does not need ready game for simulation
 But one needs to understand what to simulate
 Does not replace playtesting
 But simulation can show the features work in the long
run

Assignment

Assignment
 Use relevant presented approaches to analyze
your game design and
 Balance it / set difficulty
 Fine-tune play time
 Combine with play-testing
 Return
 Documentation of your process (steps, calculations)
 Around 1-2 pages

That’s all folks

Analysis for design

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Petri Lankoski

More from Petri Lankoski (19)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Analysis for design

Editor's Notes