The document models residential water, energy, greenhouse gas emissions, and costs in California. It develops models to account for variability in location and heterogeneity in household consumption. Monte Carlo simulations are used to generate representative households. Results show potential water and energy savings from conservation strategies. The author concludes that managing water and related energy jointly can significantly reduce emissions, and targeting conservation based on heterogeneity is important for policy.
1. MODELING RESIDENTIAL
WATER, ENERGY, GHG EMISSIONS and COSTS
IN CALIFORNIA
WEC 2014 CONFERENCE MEXICO CITY, MAY 23rd 2014
ALVAR ESCRIVA-BOU
alesbou@gmail.com
@alesbou
notjustwater.wordpress.com
2. MOTIVATION
• In California, 19% of all
electricity and 30% of
all natural gas is used to
extract, move, treat and
heat water (CEC 2005).
• Residential end-uses:
5.4% of all electricity
and 15.1% of all natural
gas used in the state.
OBJECTIVES
• Model to obtain water
end-uses, water-related
energy, GHG emissions
and costs for California
households.
• Implement and analyze
potential conservation
strategies.
INTRODUCTION1
WEC 2014 CONFERENCE MEXICO CITY, MAY 23rd 2014
3. PREVIOUS STUDIES
• Fidar et al. (2010) → Water-related energy and CO2
emissions at household level based on average
end-use values (UK).
• Kenway et al. (2011, 2013) → Water and energy
end-use model and CO2 emissions based in one
standard house (Australia)
• Abdallah and Rosenberg (2013) → End-Use model
accounting for heterogeneity (United States).
INTRODUCTION1
WEC 2014 CONFERENCE MEXICO CITY, MAY 23rd 2014
5. CONTRIBUTIONS2
WEC 2014 CONFERENCE MEXICO CITY, MAY 23rd 2014
• VARIABILITY in location
• HETEROGENEITY in consumption
Household characteristics User’s behaviors
External conditions
6. CONTRIBUTIONS2
WEC 2014 CONFERENCE MEXICO CITY, MAY 23rd 2014
• VARIABILITY in location
• HETEROGENEITY in consumption
• Water and energy RATE STRUCTURES
7. METHODOLOGY3
WEC 2014 CONFERENCE MEXICO CITY, MAY 23rd 2014
• Data-driven:
• “California Single-Family Water Use Efficiency Study”
(DeOreo, 2011).
• “Residential Energy Consumption Survey” (DOE, 2009).
• Build representative houses:
• Monte Carlo simulations.
• Probability distributions for parameters affecting water
and energy use.
8. METHODOLOGY3
• Water End-Use Model → Using “California Single-Family
Water Use Efficiency Study” (DeOreo, 2011).
• Energy Model → Using “Residential Energy Consumption
Survey” (DOE, 2009).
• GHG Emissions → Using Emission Factors from California
Climate Action Registry (CCAR) and US Energy Information
Administration.
• Simulate Conservation Strategies.
Water End-Use
Model
Water Costs
Energy End-Use
Model
Energy Costs
GHG Emissions
Conservation
Strategies
WEC 2014 CONFERENCE MEXICO CITY, MAY 23rd 2014
16. • Electric emission factors obtained from California Climate Action Registry,
and Natural Gas emission factors from US Energy Information
Administration:
GHG EMISSIONS8
WEC 2014 CONFERENCE MEXICO CITY, MAY 23rd 2014
Power Utility
Electricity
(kg CO2/kWh)
Natural Gas
(kg CO2/therm)
PG&E 0.24 5.31
San Francisco City and County 0.30 5.31
San Diego Gas & Electric 0.32 5.31
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 0.58 5.31
Southern California Edison 0.30 5.31
38. POLICY
IMPLICATIONS
10
WEC 2014 CONFERENCE MEXICO CITY, MAY 23rd 2014
• Differences in “willingness to adopt”
conservation strategies
• Targeting
• Planning scales: Efficiency for whom?
39.
40.
41. • Managing water and water-related energy
jointly is a way to reduce significantly
greenhouse emissions in California
TAKE HOME
MESSAGES
11
• Stimulate customers to save water
adding the water-related energy costs.
• Consideration of
heterogeneity and
variability is essential
to define policies.
WEC 2014 CONFERENCE MEXICO CITY, MAY 23rd 2014