SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 30
An earthquake is also defined as the
sudden slip of one part of the Earth's
crust, relative to another, along a
fault surface.
A gradual build-up of mechanical
stress in the crust, primarily the result of
tectonic forces, provides the source
of energy for earthquakes; sudden
motion along a fault releases it in the
form of seismic waves.
It's unclear when the connection
between faults and earthquakes was
first made, but by the late 19th
Century most scientists accepted this
association as fact, even if the
mechanisms behind it were still a
mystery.
Connecting Earthquakes and Faults
Thrust fault scarp at El Asnam,
Algeria.
Fault research received a
tremendous boost in the
aftermath of the great San
Francisco earthquake of 1906.
This was one of the first
earthquakes for which both
seismographic and fault-rupture
studies were conducted.
The fault rupture occurred in
through a very well-surveyed,
developed area.
Connecting Earthquakes and Faults
Because of this, researchers could
not only map the offset across the
fault trace, but also the amount of
displacement between points far
removed from the fault.
This work led to the formulation of
the elastic rebound theory of fault
rupture by Princeton geologist Harry
F. Reid.
Connecting Earthquakes and Faults
As technology improved, seismic
networks grew, and research into
the mechanism of fault rupture
increased, new methods arose that
helped quantify the link between
earthquakes and faults.
One important find helped link
magnitude (energy) with the
severity of fault rupture.
The seismic moment (MO) of an
earthquake, which can be
estimated from analysis of seismic
waves, was discovered to be
directly proportional to the extent
of the actual fault rupture.
Connecting Earthquakes and Faults
1999 Chi-Chi earthquake, Taiwan
How big is an earthquake?
Depends on how big a
patch of the fault breaks. If
the patch that breaks is a
few square miles, you may
have a magnitude five
earthquake.
If it's up to a couple
hundred square miles, you
have a magnitude seven. If
it's a couple of thousand
square miles, you get a M
7.8, 1906 San Francisco
quake."
Earthquake Magnitude
1999 Chi-Chi earthquake, Taiwan
EARTHQUAKE
SOURCE
PARAMETERS
Magnitude, fault
area, fault slip,
stress drop, energy
release
“the big one”
EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE
Earliest measure of earthquake
size
Dimensionless number
measured various ways,
including
ML local magnitude
mb body wave magnitude
Ms surface wave magnitude
Mw moment magnitude
Easy to measure
Empirical - except for Mw, no
direct tie to physics of faulting
Note; not dimensionally correct
The seismic moment is the product
of the area of fault surface that
ruptures, the average displacement
along that surface, and a constant
-- a measure of the elastic property
of rock (i.e. how easily it can be
stretched) called the modulus of
rigidity.
Moment magnitude (MW) is based
upon the seismic moment, and
represents a kind of bridge
between the seismological and
geological views of an earthquake.
Connecting Earthquakes and Faults
The seismic moment is the
product of the area of fault
surface that ruptures, the
average displacement along
that surface, and a constant --
a measure of the elastic
property of rock (i.e. how
easily it can be stretched)
called the modulus of rigidity.
Moment magnitude (MW) is
based upon the seismic
moment, and represents a
kind of bridge between the
seismological and geological
views of an earthquake.
Connecting Earthquakes and Faults
Seismic moment
The seismic moment is a
measure of the size of an
earthquake based on the
area of fault rupture, the
average amount of slip, and
the force that was required to
overcome the friction sticking
the rocks together that were
offset by faulting.
Seismic moment can also be
calculated from the
amplitude spectra of seismic
waves.
Connecting Earthquakes and Faults
A more consistent measure of big
earthquakes nowadays is the
magnitude calculated on the
basis of seismic moment (MO),
called Moment Magnitude (MW
).
Because fault geometry and
displacement are a part of the
MO, moment is a more consistent
measure of earthquake size than is
magnitude, and more importantly,
moment does not have an upper
bound.
Moment does not tend to saturate
as Richter magnitude does. The
seismic moment is related to the
faulting process.
Seismic moment = a better measure of EQ size
The size of the area that slips
during an earthquake is
increases with earthquake
size.
The largest earthquakes
generally rupture the entire
depth of the fault, which is
controlled by temperature.
The temperature increases
with depth to a point where
the rocks become plastic and
no longer store the elastic
strain energy necessary to fail
suddenly.
The shaded regions on the fault
surface are the areas that rupture
during different size events
Earthquake size and the area of slip
Seismologists have more recently developed a standard magnitude scale
that is completely independent of the type of instrument. It is called the
moment magnitude, and it comes from the seismic moment.
To get an idea of the seismic moment, go back to the concept of torque. A
torque is a force that changes the angular momentum of a system. It is
defined as the force times the distance from the center of rotation.
Earthquakes are caused by internal torques, from the interactions of different
blocks of the earth on opposite sides of faults. The moment of an
earthquake is simply expressed by:
The moment of an earthquake, is fundamental to our understanding of how
dangerous faults of a certain size can be.
Seismic Moment
Seismic Moment = µ S A
µ = shear modulus = 3x1011
dyne/cm2
in continental
crust
A = Length x Width = fault
area
S = average displacement
or slip during fault rupture.
Seismic Moment
What is a dyne?
1 gram of mass an acceleration of a
cm/s2
1 dyne = 1 gram x cm/sec2
MO
= µSA
Mw = (2/3)log(µSA)-10.7 or
MW
= (2/3)log(MO
) - 10.7
µ is the shear strength of the faulted rock
A is the area of the fault
S is the average slip or displacement on the
fault.
These factors have led to the definition of a new
magnitude scale MW
.
It is based on seismic moment, where
MW
= 2/3 log10
(MO
) - 10.7. (MO
is in dyne/centimeter)
MW
close approximates MS
up to magnitude 7.0, but
continues to rise without saturation to values as
large as 9.5 for the 1960 Southern Chile earthquake.
fault length: 100 km Seismic moment and Moment Magnitude
fault depth: minimum of 12 km
average slip: 6±2 m
average shear modulus (µ): 3x1011
dyne/cm2
 
Mo = µ SA: where S = avg slip, A = fault area; µ = shear modulus
Mo = (3x1011
dyne/cm2
)(6 m [100 cm/m])(100 km [100,000 cm/km] x 12 km
[100,000 cm/km]) = 2.16 x 1027
Mw = 2/3logMo-10.7 = 7.5
Mo = (3x1011
dyne/cm2
)(8 m [100 cm/m])(100 km [100,000 cm/km] x 12 km
[100,000 cm/km]) = 2.88 x 1027
Mw = 2/3logMo - 10.7 = 7.6
COMPARE
EARTHQUAKES
USING SEISMIC
MOMENT M0
Magnitudes, moments (dyn-
cm), fault areas, and fault
slips for several
earthquakes
Alaska & San Francisco
differ much more than Ms
implies
M0 more useful measure
Units: dyne-cm or Nt-M
Directly tied to fault physics
Doesn’t saturate
Stein & Wysession, 2003
EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PARAMETER ESTIMATES HAVE
CONSIDERABLE UNCERTAINTIES FOR SEVERAL REASONS:
- Uncertainties due to earth's variability and deviations from the mathematical
simplifications used. Even with high-quality modern data, seismic moment
estimates for the Loma Prieta earthquake vary by about 25%, and Ms values
vary by about 0.2 units.
- Uncertainties for historic earthquakes are large. Fault length estimates for the San
Francisco earthquake vary from 300-500 km, Ms was estimated at 8.3 but now
thought to be ~7.8, and fault width is essentially unknown and inferred from the
depths of more recent earthquakes and geodetic data.
- Different techniques (body waves, surface waves, geodesy, geology) can yield
different estimates.
- Fault dimensions and dislocations shown are average values for quantities that
can vary significantly along the fault
Hence different studies yield varying and sometimes inconsistent values. Even so,
data are sufficient to show effects of interest.
Moment magnitude Mw
Magnitudes saturate:
No matter how big the
earthquake
mb never exceeds ~6.4
Ms never exceeds ~8.4
Mw defined from moment so
never saturates
THREE
EARTHQUAKES IN
NORTH AMERICA -
PACIFIC PLATE
BOUNDARY ZONE
Tectonic setting affects
earthquake size
San Fernando earthquake on
buried thrust fault in the Los
Angeles area, similar to
Northridge earthquake.
Short faults are part of an
oblique trend in the boundary
zone, so fault areas are roughly
rectangular.
The down-dip width controlled
by rocks deeper than ~20 km
are weak and undergo stable
sliding rather than accumulate
strain for future earthquakes.
Stein & Wysession, 2003
THREE
EARTHQUAKES IN
NORTH AMERICA -
PACIFIC PLATE
BOUNDARY ZONE
Tectonic setting affects
earthquake size
San Francisco earthquake
ruptured a long segment of
the San Andreas with
significantly larger slip, but
because the fault is vertical,
still had a narrow width.
This earthquake illustrates
approximately the maximum
size of continental transform
earthquakes.
Stein & Wysession, 2003
THREE
EARTHQUAKES IN
NORTH AMERICA -
PACIFIC PLATE
BOUNDARY ZONE
Tectonic setting affects
earthquake size
Alaska earthquake had much
larger rupture area because it
occurred on shallow-dipping
subduction thrust interface.
The larger fault dimensions
give rise to greater slip, so the
combined effects of larger
fault area and more slip cause
largest earthquakes to occur
at subduction zones rather
than transforms.
Stein & Wysession, 2003
LARGER EARTHQUAKES GENERALLY HAVE LONGER
FAULTS AND LARGER SLIP
M7, ~ 100 km long, 1 m slip; M6, ~ 10 km long, ~ 20 cm slip
Important for earthquake source physics and hazard estimation
Wells and
Coppersmith, 1994
Most Destructive Known Earthquakes on Record in the World
(> 50,000 deaths)
(Listed in order of greatest number of deaths)
Date Location Deaths M Comments
January 23, 1556 China, Shansi 830,000
October 11, 1737 India, Calcutta** 300,000
July 27, 1976 China, Tangshan 255,000* 8.0
December 26, 2007 Indonesia 225,000 9.3 Large tsunami
August 9, 1138 Syria, Aleppo 230,000
May 22, 1927 China, near Xining 200,000 8.3 Large fractures.
December 22, 856+ Iran, Damghan 200,000
December 16, 1920 China, Gansu 200,000 8.6 Major fractures, landslides
March 23, 893+ Iran, Ardabil 150,000
September 1, 1923 Japan, Kwanto 143,000 8.3 Great Tokyo fire
December 28, 1908 Italy, Messina 70,000 7.5 Earthquake & tsunami (100,000)
September, 1290 China, Chihli 100,000
November, 1667 Caucasia, Shemakha 80,000
November 18, 1727 Iran, Tabriz 77,000
November 1, 1755 Portugal, Lisbon 70,000 8.7 Great tsunami
December 25, 1932 China, Gansu 70,000 7.6
May 31, 1970 Peru 66,000 7.8 Great rock slide and flood
1268 Asia Minor, Silicia 60,000
January 11, 1693 Italy, Sicily 60,000
May 30, 1935 Pakistan, Quetta 30,000 7.5 Quetta almost completely
destroyed (~60,000)
February 4, 1783 Italy, Calabria 50,000
June 20, 1990 Iran 50,000 7.7 Landslides
* Official casualty figure--estimated death toll as high as 655,000.
+ Note that these dates are prior to 1000 AD. No digit is missing.
** Later research has shown that this was a typhoon, not an earthquake. (1737 Calcutta Earthquake Bilham, 1994)
TEN LARGEST EARTHQUAKES IN THE UNITED STATES
Magnitude Date (UTC) Location Length Duration
(km) (sec)
9.2 03/ 28/1964 Prince William Sound, Alaska
8.8 03/09/1957 Andreanof Islands, Alaska
8.7 02/04 /1965 Rat Islands, Alaska
8.3 11/11/1938 East of Shumagin Islands, Alaska
8.3 07/10/1958 Lituya Bay, Alaska
8.2 10/10/1899 Yakutat Bay, Alaska
8.2 10/4/1899 Near Cape Yakataga, Alaska
8.0 05/7/1986 Andreanof Islands, Alaska
7.9 11/3/2002 South central Alaska 340
7.9 02/7/1812 New Madrid, Missouri
7.9 01/9/1857 Fort Tejon, California 360 130
7.9 04/3/1868 Ka'u District, Island of Hawaii
7.9 10/9, 1900 Kodiak Island, Alaska
7.9 11/30/1987 Gulf of Alaska
7.5 03/18/1906 San Francisco, California (downgraded from M 8)
For comparison, the largest earthquake ever recorded was a moment magnitude 9.5 in Chile
on May 22, 1960. The largest earthquake ever recorded in the United States was in Alaska
on March 27, 1964, with moment magnitude 9.2
A longer fault produces a bigger earthquake that lasts a longer time.
Magnitude Date Location Length Duration
(km) (sec)
7.8 January 9, 1857 Fort Tejon 360 130
7.7 April 18, 1906 San Francisco 400 110
7.5 July 21, 1952 Kern County 75 27
7.3 June 28, 1992 Landers 70 24
7.0 October 17, 1989 Loma Prieta 40 7
6.9 May 18, 1940 Imperial Valley 50 15
6.7 February 9, 1971 San Fernando 16 8
6.7 January 17, 1994 Northridge 14 7
6.6 November 24, 1987 Superstition Hills 23 15
6.5 April 9, 1968 Borrego Mountain 25 6
6.4 October 15, 1979 Imperial Valley 30 13
6.4 March 10, 1933 Long Beach 15 5
6.1 April 22, 1992 Joshua Tree 15 5
5.9 July 8, 1986 North Palm Springs 20 4
5.9 October 1, 1987 Whittier Narrows 6 3
5.8 June 28, 1991 Sierra Madre 5 2
Earthquakes of a given magnitude are ~10 times less frequent than those one magnitude
smaller. An M7 earthquake occurs approximately monthly, and an earthquake of M> 6
about every three days.
Magnitude is proportional to the logarithm of the energy released, so most energy
released seismically is in the largest earthquakes. An M 8.5 event releases more energy
than all other earthquakes in a year combined. Hence the hazard from earthquakes is
due primarily to large (typically magnitude > 6.5) earthquakes.
2004 Indonesia

More Related Content

What's hot

(5 12 09) How Earthquakes Work
(5 12 09) How Earthquakes Work(5 12 09) How Earthquakes Work
(5 12 09) How Earthquakes Work
chairesj
 
4.1 earthquakes
4.1 earthquakes4.1 earthquakes
4.1 earthquakes
mojavehack
 
Effects of earthquake and tsunami
Effects of earthquake and    tsunamiEffects of earthquake and    tsunami
Effects of earthquake and tsunami
Sandeep Sannidhi
 

What's hot (20)

Insitu stresses and measurement
Insitu stresses and measurementInsitu stresses and measurement
Insitu stresses and measurement
 
Earthquakes 101
Earthquakes 101Earthquakes 101
Earthquakes 101
 
Seismology
SeismologySeismology
Seismology
 
Structural geology : foliation
Structural geology : foliationStructural geology : foliation
Structural geology : foliation
 
What is a Hurricane?
What is a Hurricane?What is a Hurricane?
What is a Hurricane?
 
San Andreas Fault
San Andreas FaultSan Andreas Fault
San Andreas Fault
 
Seismic waves their types & Seismicity of Pakistan
Seismic waves their types & Seismicity of PakistanSeismic waves their types & Seismicity of Pakistan
Seismic waves their types & Seismicity of Pakistan
 
(5 12 09) How Earthquakes Work
(5 12 09) How Earthquakes Work(5 12 09) How Earthquakes Work
(5 12 09) How Earthquakes Work
 
Geography / natural Hazards
Geography / natural HazardsGeography / natural Hazards
Geography / natural Hazards
 
Applications Gravity survey Magnetic survey Electrical resistivity survey Sei...
Applications Gravity survey Magnetic survey Electrical resistivity survey Sei...Applications Gravity survey Magnetic survey Electrical resistivity survey Sei...
Applications Gravity survey Magnetic survey Electrical resistivity survey Sei...
 
Space Weather Impacts on Critical Infrastructure
Space Weather Impacts on Critical InfrastructureSpace Weather Impacts on Critical Infrastructure
Space Weather Impacts on Critical Infrastructure
 
Geomagnetic method
Geomagnetic methodGeomagnetic method
Geomagnetic method
 
4.1 earthquakes
4.1 earthquakes4.1 earthquakes
4.1 earthquakes
 
Types of slope failures
Types of slope failuresTypes of slope failures
Types of slope failures
 
Earthquakes
EarthquakesEarthquakes
Earthquakes
 
Effects of earthquake and tsunami
Effects of earthquake and    tsunamiEffects of earthquake and    tsunami
Effects of earthquake and tsunami
 
EarthQuakes
EarthQuakesEarthQuakes
EarthQuakes
 
Basics of drilling 3
Basics of drilling 3Basics of drilling 3
Basics of drilling 3
 
Earthquake and effects of it
Earthquake and effects of itEarthquake and effects of it
Earthquake and effects of it
 
Index properties of rock
Index properties of rockIndex properties of rock
Index properties of rock
 

Viewers also liked

Eq and tsunamis
Eq and tsunamisEq and tsunamis
Eq and tsunamis
MissST
 
Master's Thesis Presentation
Master's Thesis PresentationMaster's Thesis Presentation
Master's Thesis Presentation
Ella Uhac
 
Urban Sprawl In America
Urban Sprawl In AmericaUrban Sprawl In America
Urban Sprawl In America
vitor94
 
Contribution of compact city to urban sustainability
Contribution of compact city to urban sustainabilityContribution of compact city to urban sustainability
Contribution of compact city to urban sustainability
Naina Gupta
 
compact cities vs. urban sprawl
compact cities vs. urban sprawlcompact cities vs. urban sprawl
compact cities vs. urban sprawl
GCUF
 
Theories and Concepts of town planning
Theories and Concepts of town planningTheories and Concepts of town planning
Theories and Concepts of town planning
Srishti Mehta
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Compact city gothenburg
Compact city   gothenburgCompact city   gothenburg
Compact city gothenburg
 
Eq and tsunamis
Eq and tsunamisEq and tsunamis
Eq and tsunamis
 
Geotechnical Aspects
Geotechnical AspectsGeotechnical Aspects
Geotechnical Aspects
 
Compact City
Compact CityCompact City
Compact City
 
Master's Thesis Presentation
Master's Thesis PresentationMaster's Thesis Presentation
Master's Thesis Presentation
 
The Historical City as the Sustainable Compact City Model_2001
The Historical City as the Sustainable Compact City Model_2001The Historical City as the Sustainable Compact City Model_2001
The Historical City as the Sustainable Compact City Model_2001
 
Urban sprawl Final
Urban sprawl FinalUrban sprawl Final
Urban sprawl Final
 
RV 2015: Sinking in a Sea of Green? Anti-Government Crusaders Get Their Way b...
RV 2015: Sinking in a Sea of Green? Anti-Government Crusaders Get Their Way b...RV 2015: Sinking in a Sea of Green? Anti-Government Crusaders Get Their Way b...
RV 2015: Sinking in a Sea of Green? Anti-Government Crusaders Get Their Way b...
 
Liquefaction and liquefaction potential
Liquefaction and liquefaction potentialLiquefaction and liquefaction potential
Liquefaction and liquefaction potential
 
Urban sprawl [compatibility mode]
Urban sprawl [compatibility mode]Urban sprawl [compatibility mode]
Urban sprawl [compatibility mode]
 
Urban Sprawl In America
Urban Sprawl In AmericaUrban Sprawl In America
Urban Sprawl In America
 
Contribution of compact city to urban sustainability
Contribution of compact city to urban sustainabilityContribution of compact city to urban sustainability
Contribution of compact city to urban sustainability
 
compact cities vs. urban sprawl
compact cities vs. urban sprawlcompact cities vs. urban sprawl
compact cities vs. urban sprawl
 
Liquefaction final
Liquefaction finalLiquefaction final
Liquefaction final
 
Slums In India
Slums In IndiaSlums In India
Slums In India
 
Liquefaction of soil
Liquefaction of soilLiquefaction of soil
Liquefaction of soil
 
Compact city
Compact cityCompact city
Compact city
 
A Slum Redevelopment Project
A Slum Redevelopment ProjectA Slum Redevelopment Project
A Slum Redevelopment Project
 
City forms
City formsCity forms
City forms
 
Theories and Concepts of town planning
Theories and Concepts of town planningTheories and Concepts of town planning
Theories and Concepts of town planning
 

Similar to Connecting earthquakes and faults

Butler_masters_thesis_proposal_final
Butler_masters_thesis_proposal_finalButler_masters_thesis_proposal_final
Butler_masters_thesis_proposal_final
Austin Butler
 
Earthquake an explanation text
Earthquake an explanation textEarthquake an explanation text
Earthquake an explanation text
sman 2 mataram
 
GEOTECHNICAL_EARTHQUAKE_ENGINEERING (1).pptx
GEOTECHNICAL_EARTHQUAKE_ENGINEERING (1).pptxGEOTECHNICAL_EARTHQUAKE_ENGINEERING (1).pptx
GEOTECHNICAL_EARTHQUAKE_ENGINEERING (1).pptx
RajanDas20
 
Chapter 8outline
Chapter 8outlineChapter 8outline
Chapter 8outline
jmchenry071
 
Earthquake horrible
Earthquake  horribleEarthquake  horrible
Earthquake horrible
mehmet669
 

Similar to Connecting earthquakes and faults (20)

Earthquake
EarthquakeEarthquake
Earthquake
 
Earth quakes
Earth quakesEarth quakes
Earth quakes
 
Natural disaster earthquake
Natural disaster earthquake Natural disaster earthquake
Natural disaster earthquake
 
Iotsunami
IotsunamiIotsunami
Iotsunami
 
Butler_masters_thesis_proposal_final
Butler_masters_thesis_proposal_finalButler_masters_thesis_proposal_final
Butler_masters_thesis_proposal_final
 
Earthquake an explanation text
Earthquake an explanation textEarthquake an explanation text
Earthquake an explanation text
 
Earthquakes
EarthquakesEarthquakes
Earthquakes
 
Earthquakes
EarthquakesEarthquakes
Earthquakes
 
GEOTECHNICAL_EARTHQUAKE_ENGINEERING (1).pptx
GEOTECHNICAL_EARTHQUAKE_ENGINEERING (1).pptxGEOTECHNICAL_EARTHQUAKE_ENGINEERING (1).pptx
GEOTECHNICAL_EARTHQUAKE_ENGINEERING (1).pptx
 
Earthquake seismology
Earthquake seismologyEarthquake seismology
Earthquake seismology
 
Chapter 8outline
Chapter 8outlineChapter 8outline
Chapter 8outline
 
Earthquake and earthquake resistant design
Earthquake   and earthquake resistant designEarthquake   and earthquake resistant design
Earthquake and earthquake resistant design
 
Presentation-3.pptx
Presentation-3.pptxPresentation-3.pptx
Presentation-3.pptx
 
Disaster Management
Disaster ManagementDisaster Management
Disaster Management
 
Iotsunami
IotsunamiIotsunami
Iotsunami
 
Earthquakes.pptx
Earthquakes.pptxEarthquakes.pptx
Earthquakes.pptx
 
Earthquake horrible
Earthquake  horribleEarthquake  horrible
Earthquake horrible
 
Earthquakes
Earthquakes Earthquakes
Earthquakes
 
Presentation
PresentationPresentation
Presentation
 
Final Year Project on Seismic Analysis of Residential Building using Staad.Pro
Final Year Project on Seismic Analysis of Residential Building using Staad.ProFinal Year Project on Seismic Analysis of Residential Building using Staad.Pro
Final Year Project on Seismic Analysis of Residential Building using Staad.Pro
 

More from University of Azad Jammu & Kashmir

More from University of Azad Jammu & Kashmir (20)

Water cycle
Water cycleWater cycle
Water cycle
 
Traps in Petroleum exploration
Traps in Petroleum explorationTraps in Petroleum exploration
Traps in Petroleum exploration
 
Terminology of folds
Terminology of  foldsTerminology of  folds
Terminology of folds
 
Seismic waves
Seismic wavesSeismic waves
Seismic waves
 
Study of deform rocks, folds and its types
Study of deform rocks, folds and its typesStudy of deform rocks, folds and its types
Study of deform rocks, folds and its types
 
Seismic waves
Seismic wavesSeismic waves
Seismic waves
 
Sedimentry struture
Sedimentry strutureSedimentry struture
Sedimentry struture
 
New introduction to seismic method
New introduction to seismic method New introduction to seismic method
New introduction to seismic method
 
PYROXENE GROUP OF MINERALS
PYROXENE GROUP OF MINERALSPYROXENE GROUP OF MINERALS
PYROXENE GROUP OF MINERALS
 
Primary sedimentary structures
Primary sedimentary structuresPrimary sedimentary structures
Primary sedimentary structures
 
Fract&fault
Fract&faultFract&fault
Fract&fault
 
Folds& fults
Folds& fultsFolds& fults
Folds& fults
 
Deformation and .mountain building
Deformation and  .mountain buildingDeformation and  .mountain building
Deformation and .mountain building
 
Cleavage, foliation, lineation
Cleavage, foliation, lineationCleavage, foliation, lineation
Cleavage, foliation, lineation
 
Cleavage and foliations
Cleavage and foliationsCleavage and foliations
Cleavage and foliations
 
Classification of micro fossil theory
Classification of micro fossil theoryClassification of micro fossil theory
Classification of micro fossil theory
 
Faults of Indian Plate
Faults of Indian Plate Faults of Indian Plate
Faults of Indian Plate
 
Active faults of pakistan
Active faults of pakistanActive faults of pakistan
Active faults of pakistan
 
rig types and its components
rig types and its componentsrig types and its components
rig types and its components
 
Primary sedimentary structures
Primary sedimentary structuresPrimary sedimentary structures
Primary sedimentary structures
 

Recently uploaded

The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 

Recently uploaded (20)

HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptxHMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
 
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
 
Exploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptx
Exploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptxExploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptx
Exploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptx
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
On_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptx
On_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptxOn_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptx
On_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptx
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
 
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
 
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptxTowards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
 
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
 
NO1 Top Black Magic Specialist In Lahore Black magic In Pakistan Kala Ilam Ex...
NO1 Top Black Magic Specialist In Lahore Black magic In Pakistan Kala Ilam Ex...NO1 Top Black Magic Specialist In Lahore Black magic In Pakistan Kala Ilam Ex...
NO1 Top Black Magic Specialist In Lahore Black magic In Pakistan Kala Ilam Ex...
 
Unit 3 Emotional Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence.pdf
Unit 3 Emotional Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence.pdfUnit 3 Emotional Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence.pdf
Unit 3 Emotional Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence.pdf
 
COMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptx
COMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptxCOMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptx
COMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptx
 
Wellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptx
Wellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptxWellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptx
Wellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptx
 
Single or Multiple melodic lines structure
Single or Multiple melodic lines structureSingle or Multiple melodic lines structure
Single or Multiple melodic lines structure
 
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning PresentationSOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
 
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
 
HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx
HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptxHMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx
HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx
 
Sensory_Experience_and_Emotional_Resonance_in_Gabriel_Okaras_The_Piano_and_Th...
Sensory_Experience_and_Emotional_Resonance_in_Gabriel_Okaras_The_Piano_and_Th...Sensory_Experience_and_Emotional_Resonance_in_Gabriel_Okaras_The_Piano_and_Th...
Sensory_Experience_and_Emotional_Resonance_in_Gabriel_Okaras_The_Piano_and_Th...
 

Connecting earthquakes and faults

  • 1. An earthquake is also defined as the sudden slip of one part of the Earth's crust, relative to another, along a fault surface. A gradual build-up of mechanical stress in the crust, primarily the result of tectonic forces, provides the source of energy for earthquakes; sudden motion along a fault releases it in the form of seismic waves. It's unclear when the connection between faults and earthquakes was first made, but by the late 19th Century most scientists accepted this association as fact, even if the mechanisms behind it were still a mystery. Connecting Earthquakes and Faults Thrust fault scarp at El Asnam, Algeria.
  • 2. Fault research received a tremendous boost in the aftermath of the great San Francisco earthquake of 1906. This was one of the first earthquakes for which both seismographic and fault-rupture studies were conducted. The fault rupture occurred in through a very well-surveyed, developed area. Connecting Earthquakes and Faults
  • 3. Because of this, researchers could not only map the offset across the fault trace, but also the amount of displacement between points far removed from the fault. This work led to the formulation of the elastic rebound theory of fault rupture by Princeton geologist Harry F. Reid. Connecting Earthquakes and Faults
  • 4. As technology improved, seismic networks grew, and research into the mechanism of fault rupture increased, new methods arose that helped quantify the link between earthquakes and faults. One important find helped link magnitude (energy) with the severity of fault rupture. The seismic moment (MO) of an earthquake, which can be estimated from analysis of seismic waves, was discovered to be directly proportional to the extent of the actual fault rupture. Connecting Earthquakes and Faults 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake, Taiwan
  • 5. How big is an earthquake? Depends on how big a patch of the fault breaks. If the patch that breaks is a few square miles, you may have a magnitude five earthquake. If it's up to a couple hundred square miles, you have a magnitude seven. If it's a couple of thousand square miles, you get a M 7.8, 1906 San Francisco quake." Earthquake Magnitude 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake, Taiwan
  • 6. EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PARAMETERS Magnitude, fault area, fault slip, stress drop, energy release “the big one”
  • 7. EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE Earliest measure of earthquake size Dimensionless number measured various ways, including ML local magnitude mb body wave magnitude Ms surface wave magnitude Mw moment magnitude Easy to measure Empirical - except for Mw, no direct tie to physics of faulting Note; not dimensionally correct
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11. The seismic moment is the product of the area of fault surface that ruptures, the average displacement along that surface, and a constant -- a measure of the elastic property of rock (i.e. how easily it can be stretched) called the modulus of rigidity. Moment magnitude (MW) is based upon the seismic moment, and represents a kind of bridge between the seismological and geological views of an earthquake. Connecting Earthquakes and Faults
  • 12. The seismic moment is the product of the area of fault surface that ruptures, the average displacement along that surface, and a constant -- a measure of the elastic property of rock (i.e. how easily it can be stretched) called the modulus of rigidity. Moment magnitude (MW) is based upon the seismic moment, and represents a kind of bridge between the seismological and geological views of an earthquake. Connecting Earthquakes and Faults
  • 13. Seismic moment The seismic moment is a measure of the size of an earthquake based on the area of fault rupture, the average amount of slip, and the force that was required to overcome the friction sticking the rocks together that were offset by faulting. Seismic moment can also be calculated from the amplitude spectra of seismic waves. Connecting Earthquakes and Faults
  • 14. A more consistent measure of big earthquakes nowadays is the magnitude calculated on the basis of seismic moment (MO), called Moment Magnitude (MW ). Because fault geometry and displacement are a part of the MO, moment is a more consistent measure of earthquake size than is magnitude, and more importantly, moment does not have an upper bound. Moment does not tend to saturate as Richter magnitude does. The seismic moment is related to the faulting process. Seismic moment = a better measure of EQ size
  • 15. The size of the area that slips during an earthquake is increases with earthquake size. The largest earthquakes generally rupture the entire depth of the fault, which is controlled by temperature. The temperature increases with depth to a point where the rocks become plastic and no longer store the elastic strain energy necessary to fail suddenly. The shaded regions on the fault surface are the areas that rupture during different size events Earthquake size and the area of slip
  • 16. Seismologists have more recently developed a standard magnitude scale that is completely independent of the type of instrument. It is called the moment magnitude, and it comes from the seismic moment. To get an idea of the seismic moment, go back to the concept of torque. A torque is a force that changes the angular momentum of a system. It is defined as the force times the distance from the center of rotation. Earthquakes are caused by internal torques, from the interactions of different blocks of the earth on opposite sides of faults. The moment of an earthquake is simply expressed by: The moment of an earthquake, is fundamental to our understanding of how dangerous faults of a certain size can be. Seismic Moment
  • 17. Seismic Moment = µ S A µ = shear modulus = 3x1011 dyne/cm2 in continental crust A = Length x Width = fault area S = average displacement or slip during fault rupture. Seismic Moment What is a dyne? 1 gram of mass an acceleration of a cm/s2 1 dyne = 1 gram x cm/sec2
  • 18. MO = µSA Mw = (2/3)log(µSA)-10.7 or MW = (2/3)log(MO ) - 10.7 µ is the shear strength of the faulted rock A is the area of the fault S is the average slip or displacement on the fault. These factors have led to the definition of a new magnitude scale MW . It is based on seismic moment, where MW = 2/3 log10 (MO ) - 10.7. (MO is in dyne/centimeter) MW close approximates MS up to magnitude 7.0, but continues to rise without saturation to values as large as 9.5 for the 1960 Southern Chile earthquake.
  • 19. fault length: 100 km Seismic moment and Moment Magnitude fault depth: minimum of 12 km average slip: 6±2 m average shear modulus (µ): 3x1011 dyne/cm2   Mo = µ SA: where S = avg slip, A = fault area; µ = shear modulus Mo = (3x1011 dyne/cm2 )(6 m [100 cm/m])(100 km [100,000 cm/km] x 12 km [100,000 cm/km]) = 2.16 x 1027 Mw = 2/3logMo-10.7 = 7.5 Mo = (3x1011 dyne/cm2 )(8 m [100 cm/m])(100 km [100,000 cm/km] x 12 km [100,000 cm/km]) = 2.88 x 1027 Mw = 2/3logMo - 10.7 = 7.6
  • 20. COMPARE EARTHQUAKES USING SEISMIC MOMENT M0 Magnitudes, moments (dyn- cm), fault areas, and fault slips for several earthquakes Alaska & San Francisco differ much more than Ms implies M0 more useful measure Units: dyne-cm or Nt-M Directly tied to fault physics Doesn’t saturate Stein & Wysession, 2003
  • 21. EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PARAMETER ESTIMATES HAVE CONSIDERABLE UNCERTAINTIES FOR SEVERAL REASONS: - Uncertainties due to earth's variability and deviations from the mathematical simplifications used. Even with high-quality modern data, seismic moment estimates for the Loma Prieta earthquake vary by about 25%, and Ms values vary by about 0.2 units. - Uncertainties for historic earthquakes are large. Fault length estimates for the San Francisco earthquake vary from 300-500 km, Ms was estimated at 8.3 but now thought to be ~7.8, and fault width is essentially unknown and inferred from the depths of more recent earthquakes and geodetic data. - Different techniques (body waves, surface waves, geodesy, geology) can yield different estimates. - Fault dimensions and dislocations shown are average values for quantities that can vary significantly along the fault Hence different studies yield varying and sometimes inconsistent values. Even so, data are sufficient to show effects of interest.
  • 22. Moment magnitude Mw Magnitudes saturate: No matter how big the earthquake mb never exceeds ~6.4 Ms never exceeds ~8.4 Mw defined from moment so never saturates
  • 23. THREE EARTHQUAKES IN NORTH AMERICA - PACIFIC PLATE BOUNDARY ZONE Tectonic setting affects earthquake size San Fernando earthquake on buried thrust fault in the Los Angeles area, similar to Northridge earthquake. Short faults are part of an oblique trend in the boundary zone, so fault areas are roughly rectangular. The down-dip width controlled by rocks deeper than ~20 km are weak and undergo stable sliding rather than accumulate strain for future earthquakes. Stein & Wysession, 2003
  • 24. THREE EARTHQUAKES IN NORTH AMERICA - PACIFIC PLATE BOUNDARY ZONE Tectonic setting affects earthquake size San Francisco earthquake ruptured a long segment of the San Andreas with significantly larger slip, but because the fault is vertical, still had a narrow width. This earthquake illustrates approximately the maximum size of continental transform earthquakes. Stein & Wysession, 2003
  • 25. THREE EARTHQUAKES IN NORTH AMERICA - PACIFIC PLATE BOUNDARY ZONE Tectonic setting affects earthquake size Alaska earthquake had much larger rupture area because it occurred on shallow-dipping subduction thrust interface. The larger fault dimensions give rise to greater slip, so the combined effects of larger fault area and more slip cause largest earthquakes to occur at subduction zones rather than transforms. Stein & Wysession, 2003
  • 26. LARGER EARTHQUAKES GENERALLY HAVE LONGER FAULTS AND LARGER SLIP M7, ~ 100 km long, 1 m slip; M6, ~ 10 km long, ~ 20 cm slip Important for earthquake source physics and hazard estimation Wells and Coppersmith, 1994
  • 27. Most Destructive Known Earthquakes on Record in the World (> 50,000 deaths) (Listed in order of greatest number of deaths) Date Location Deaths M Comments January 23, 1556 China, Shansi 830,000 October 11, 1737 India, Calcutta** 300,000 July 27, 1976 China, Tangshan 255,000* 8.0 December 26, 2007 Indonesia 225,000 9.3 Large tsunami August 9, 1138 Syria, Aleppo 230,000 May 22, 1927 China, near Xining 200,000 8.3 Large fractures. December 22, 856+ Iran, Damghan 200,000 December 16, 1920 China, Gansu 200,000 8.6 Major fractures, landslides March 23, 893+ Iran, Ardabil 150,000 September 1, 1923 Japan, Kwanto 143,000 8.3 Great Tokyo fire December 28, 1908 Italy, Messina 70,000 7.5 Earthquake & tsunami (100,000) September, 1290 China, Chihli 100,000 November, 1667 Caucasia, Shemakha 80,000 November 18, 1727 Iran, Tabriz 77,000 November 1, 1755 Portugal, Lisbon 70,000 8.7 Great tsunami December 25, 1932 China, Gansu 70,000 7.6 May 31, 1970 Peru 66,000 7.8 Great rock slide and flood 1268 Asia Minor, Silicia 60,000 January 11, 1693 Italy, Sicily 60,000 May 30, 1935 Pakistan, Quetta 30,000 7.5 Quetta almost completely destroyed (~60,000) February 4, 1783 Italy, Calabria 50,000 June 20, 1990 Iran 50,000 7.7 Landslides * Official casualty figure--estimated death toll as high as 655,000. + Note that these dates are prior to 1000 AD. No digit is missing. ** Later research has shown that this was a typhoon, not an earthquake. (1737 Calcutta Earthquake Bilham, 1994)
  • 28. TEN LARGEST EARTHQUAKES IN THE UNITED STATES Magnitude Date (UTC) Location Length Duration (km) (sec) 9.2 03/ 28/1964 Prince William Sound, Alaska 8.8 03/09/1957 Andreanof Islands, Alaska 8.7 02/04 /1965 Rat Islands, Alaska 8.3 11/11/1938 East of Shumagin Islands, Alaska 8.3 07/10/1958 Lituya Bay, Alaska 8.2 10/10/1899 Yakutat Bay, Alaska 8.2 10/4/1899 Near Cape Yakataga, Alaska 8.0 05/7/1986 Andreanof Islands, Alaska 7.9 11/3/2002 South central Alaska 340 7.9 02/7/1812 New Madrid, Missouri 7.9 01/9/1857 Fort Tejon, California 360 130 7.9 04/3/1868 Ka'u District, Island of Hawaii 7.9 10/9, 1900 Kodiak Island, Alaska 7.9 11/30/1987 Gulf of Alaska 7.5 03/18/1906 San Francisco, California (downgraded from M 8) For comparison, the largest earthquake ever recorded was a moment magnitude 9.5 in Chile on May 22, 1960. The largest earthquake ever recorded in the United States was in Alaska on March 27, 1964, with moment magnitude 9.2
  • 29. A longer fault produces a bigger earthquake that lasts a longer time. Magnitude Date Location Length Duration (km) (sec) 7.8 January 9, 1857 Fort Tejon 360 130 7.7 April 18, 1906 San Francisco 400 110 7.5 July 21, 1952 Kern County 75 27 7.3 June 28, 1992 Landers 70 24 7.0 October 17, 1989 Loma Prieta 40 7 6.9 May 18, 1940 Imperial Valley 50 15 6.7 February 9, 1971 San Fernando 16 8 6.7 January 17, 1994 Northridge 14 7 6.6 November 24, 1987 Superstition Hills 23 15 6.5 April 9, 1968 Borrego Mountain 25 6 6.4 October 15, 1979 Imperial Valley 30 13 6.4 March 10, 1933 Long Beach 15 5 6.1 April 22, 1992 Joshua Tree 15 5 5.9 July 8, 1986 North Palm Springs 20 4 5.9 October 1, 1987 Whittier Narrows 6 3 5.8 June 28, 1991 Sierra Madre 5 2
  • 30. Earthquakes of a given magnitude are ~10 times less frequent than those one magnitude smaller. An M7 earthquake occurs approximately monthly, and an earthquake of M> 6 about every three days. Magnitude is proportional to the logarithm of the energy released, so most energy released seismically is in the largest earthquakes. An M 8.5 event releases more energy than all other earthquakes in a year combined. Hence the hazard from earthquakes is due primarily to large (typically magnitude > 6.5) earthquakes. 2004 Indonesia

Editor's Notes

  1. It was developed in 1931 by the American seismologists Harry Wood and Frank Neumann. This scale, composed of 12 increasing levels of intensity that range from imperceptible shaking to catastrophic destruction, is designated by Roman numerals. It does not have a mathematical basis; instead it is an arbitrary ranking based on observed effects. . It was developed in 1931 by the American seismologists Harry Wood and Frank Neumann. This scale, composed of 12 increasing levels of intensity that range from imperceptible shaking to catastrophic destruction, is designated by Roman numerals. It does not have a mathematical basis; instead it is an arbitrary ranking based on observed effects. . vIt was developed in 1931 by the American seismologists Harry Wood and Frank Neumann. This scale, composed of 12 increasing levels of intensity that range from imperceptible shaking to catastrophic destruction, is designated by Roman numerals. It does not have a mathematical basis; instead it is an arbitrary ranking based on observed effects. . It does not have a mathematical basis; instead it is an arbitrary ranking based on observed effects.
  2. 1906 SF – 4 m of slip on 450-km long fault  3 x 10**16 Joules of elastic energy – equivalent to a 7 Megaton bomb (Hiroshima was 0.012 Mt) 1960 Chile – 21 m of slip on a 800 km long fault  10**19 J of elastic energy (more than a 2000 Mt bomb – larger than all nuclear bombs ever exploded – largest was a Soviet atmospheric test of 58 Mt)