Building New Institutional Capacity in M&E: The Experience of National AIDS Coordinating Authority

Building New Institutional Capacity in M&E: The Experience of National AIDS Coordinating Authority V F Kemerer Getting To Results IDEAS Global Assembly Johannesburg, South Africa 18 March 2009

Overview ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Background Coordinate the National HIV DMRS Lead National M&E System Development NAC M&E UNIT National Agencies USG & PEPFAR GFATM UN Family Misc Bi- & Multi-Laterals CB through TA using various tools & strategies to establish and/or improve performance

Strategic Vision: Build effective and sustainable M&E systems to provide comprehensive, high-quality information

Use of Assessment Tools for Strategic Planning ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

SI Assessment Activities ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Linking SI Capacity and SI Planning with SI Products ,[object Object],[object Object],Unified SI Strategic Planning and Coordinated SI Support SI Systems Assessments Ongoing Monitoring & Feedback Building of National SI Systems

A new approach to M&E Assessments Donor-driven Country-driven Focused exclusively on capacities of specific silos Expanded to integration in the wider M&E Systems General approach More systematic approach (based on a checklist of items) Strictly Assessment Tool Broader Assessment, Management, Planning & Capacity Building Tool FROM … TO …

How does the M&E Strengthening Tool work? Step 1: Diagnosis Step 3: Action Plan ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Step 2: Analysis ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Expected Benefits ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Use of Assessment Tools for Strategic Planning ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

DQA METHODOLOGY – 2 Protocols ,[object Object],Data Verifications (Protocol 1) Quantitative comparison of recounted to reported data and review of timeliness, completeness and availability of reports. 1 Assessment of Data Management Systems (Protocol 2) Qualitative assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the data-collection and reporting system. 2

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],PROTOCOL 2: Assessment of Data Management and Reporting Systems M&E Management Unit Service Delivery Sites / Organizations Intermediate Aggregation levels (eg. District, Region) ,[object Object]

Objective of the Data Quality Assessment Tool The Data-Quality Assessment (DQA) Tool is designed to: ,[object Object],[object Object],The DQA Tool is not intended to assess the entire M&E system; it relates and focuses more in depth into component 10 (i.e. Supportive supervision and data auditing ) of the “Organizing Framework for a Functional National HIV M&E System” . !

NACA Specific Capacity Building Interventions MESST RDQA TA for DQ SI Assessment M&E Road Map 1/4ly Mentoring (SHAPMoS)

SI Assessment M&E Road Map Implementation ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

SI Assessment M&E Road Map Implementation ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Institutional Capacity Strengthened – Regional M&E Officers ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Timeline: TA to Malawi 2007 2008 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 01 02 03 04 05 Data Quality Plan for MESST MESST: Malaria MESST: HIV Discussions with NAC: Next Steps Plan for DQ T/A M&E Plan Revision

RDQA Tool To Operationalize Statement of Work ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Draft Services & Indicators Matrix Draft register(s) to be used by all CBO SDPs Draft clear instructions Draft DQ policies Draft data steps performed at each level of the DMRS Draft guidelines for quality controls Draft written back-up procedures Data Quality Training in 5 Zones

Institutional Capacity to Support Data Quality Developed ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Conclusions ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

MEASURE Evaluation is funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) through Cooperative Agreement GPO-A-00-03-00003-00 and is implemented by the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina in partnership with Futures Group, John Snow, Inc., Management Sciences for Health, ORC Macro International, and Tulane University. Visit us online at http://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure.

Building New Institutional Capacity in M&E: The Experience of National AIDS Coordinating Authority

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Building New Institutional Capacity in M&E: The Experience of National AIDS Coordinating Authority

Similar to Building New Institutional Capacity in M&E: The Experience of National AIDS Coordinating Authority (20)

More from MEASURE Evaluation

More from MEASURE Evaluation (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Building New Institutional Capacity in M&E: The Experience of National AIDS Coordinating Authority