SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 23
Download to read offline
SAT or ACT?
Breaking Myths, Finding Facts, and Planning the
Winning Strategy
SAT vs.ACT - General
Format SAT ACT
Length 3 hours, 50 mins (including
optional 50 minute essay)
3 hours, 35 mins (including optional
40 minute essay)
Structure 4 Sections (Evidence-
Based Reading,Writing,
Math without calc., Math
with calc.)
4 Sections (English, Math, Reading,
Science) + Optional Essay.
Scoring SAT ACT
Score Out of 1600. 800 for Math
and 800 for Reading+Writing.
Optional Essay receives
separate score, and
subscores/ insight scores are
available. No guessing penalty.
Composite score on a scale of
1-36 (average of all sections).
Essay contributes to ELA score.
No guessing penalty.
Reporting
Scores
You decide which full score(s)
to send
You decide which full score(s) to
send
SAT vs.ACT- Content
SAT ACT
Critical
Reading
More vocabulary, evidence
gathering
More basic fact, less inference
Math
Until end of Algebra II (including
Trigonometry). Increased focus
on Data Analysis and Algebraic
thinking.
Until end of Algebra II. Few topics
appear on ACT that do not on the
SAT (all of conics, matrices, etc.).
Scope more broadly distributed.
Writing
More word usage questions,
bigger scope of grammar rules,
~50% of rhetoric questions.
Lesser scope of grammar rules tested,
less rhetoric questions percentage
than SAT, more questions and
repetition.
Science
Not tested, but Insight Score for
Science is provided.
Analysis, Interpretation, Evaluation, and
Problem Solving.
Essay
Read passage and explain
authors argument
Analyze 3 perspectivesà state your
own
MEK SAT Program – How Effective?
—  MEK Way
◦  Dedicated and highly-trained instructors
◦  Emphasis on student’s goals
◦  Analysis of each student’s character and
weakness
◦  Fostering and rigorous environment with high
expectations
◦  Emphasis on the development of study skills
and work ethic; within and outside of MEK.
MEK SAT Philosophy
Score
Improvement
Content
Motivation
and
Confidence
Work
Ethic and
Study
Habits
Practice
MEK SAT- Analysis
—  114 students committed themselves for MEK Summer SAT
program.
◦  7 week, daily course designed to introduce, instill and
reinforce the MEK philosophy to support score
progression.
—  Custom designed SAT materials and daily structure.
—  Initial evaluation scores ranged from 1000-2100 (class
placement and strategy to support all levels)
Semester # of Students
Summer Only 38
Summer + Fall 76
Fall Only 38
Total  152
1250	
1450	
1650	
1850	
2050	
2250	
Eval	 Test	1	 Test	2	 Test	3	 Test	4	 Test	5	 Super	Score	
Overall	Score	Improvement	
1850+	
1600-1850	
1400-1600	
<1400
Eval.	Range Improvement	from	super	score Improvement	from	highest	test
1850+ 254 215
1600-1850 405 355
1400-1600 369 341
<1400 371 345
Overall 339 301
254	
405	
369	 371	
339	
215	
355	 341	 345	
301	
0	
50	
100	
150	
200	
250	
300	
350	
400	
450	
1850+	 1600-1850	 1400-1600	 <1400	 Overall	
Eval	Score	
Total	Improvement
18	
16	
25	
28	
21	
0	
5	
10	
15	
20	
25	
30	
<200	 200-275	 275-350	 350-475	 475+	
#	of	St.	
Improvement	Range	
DistribuFon	of	Improvement
Fall planning: the key to consistency
—  No official test offered in summer.
—  Fall time introduces many new variables, most of which work to
negatively affect the score gains from summer if not handled
correctly.
Eval: 1850+
  Critical Reading Math Writing Total
Summer Super 742 760 702 2203
Fall Peak 765 788 738 2250
Eval: 1600-1850
Summer Super 713 751 662 2126
Fall Peak 679 772 660 2075
Eval: 1400-1600
Summer Super 632 675 591 1898
Fall Peak 633 737 630 1907
Eval: <1400
Summer Super 521 615 507 1643
Fall Peak 560 628 508 1670
Official SAT Result Analysis
663
748
711
764
594
757
CR, Eval CR, Official M, Eval M, Official W, Eval W, Official
Eval. vs. Official: 1850+
581
689
653
744
513
693
CR, Eval CR, Official M, Eval M, Official W, Eval W, Official
Eval. vs. Official: 1600-1850
513	
667	
558	
676	
443	
666	
CR,	Eval	 CR,	Official	 M,	Eval	 M,	Official	 W,	Eval	 W,	Official	
Eval.	vs.	Official:	1400-1600	
474	
595	
498	
700	
372	
620	
CR,	Eval	 CR,	Official	 M,	Eval	 M,	Official	 W,	Eval	 W,	Official	
Eval.	vs.	Official:	<1400
1972	
2265	
1746	
2097	
1514	
1965	
1344	
1906	
1750	
2121	
1850+,	Eval	 1850+,	Official	 1600-1850,	Eval	 1600-1850,	
Official	
1400-1600,	Eval	 1400-1600,	
Official	
<1400,	Eval	 <1400,	Official	 All,	Eval	 All,	Official	
Official	Scores	vs.	Eval	Ranges	
Range Eval Official Change
1850+ 1972 2265 293
1600-1850 1746 2097 351
1400-1600 1514 1965 451
<1400 1344 1906 562
Overall 1750 2121 371
Preparation = Improvement
388
368
294
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Summer+Fall Summer Only Fall Only
Improvement based on Preparation
Range Eval Official Change
Summer+Fall 1755 2143 388
Summer Only 1834 2202 368
Fall Only 1622 1916 294
MEK Winning Strategy
—  SAT skills for training and use ACT score
for application
—  SAT content foundation translates well to
ACT demands
◦  SAT’s demand for some skills at a more
rigorous level than ACT
◦  Short prep duration- foundation is laid!
◦  Colleges accept either score!
◦  Put your best foot forward
SAT à ACT Data
—  Starting Point (Official SAT)
—  Ending Point (ACT)
Subject CR M W T
Score 671 723 721 2094
Subject English Math Reading Composite
Score 33 33 32 33
How much did it help?
  SAT Score ACT Score ACT Score’s SAT Equiv. Change
Critical Reading 671 32 720 ~49
Math 723 33 740 ~17
Writing 721 33 740 ~19
Total 2094 33 2210~2250 ~116-156
49
17 19
136
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
CR M W T
Projected Gains
Official	SAT	Score:	2200+
Avg.	Official	SAT Avg.	Official	ACT SAT	Conversion Projected	Gain
2273 35 2300~2350 27~77
Official	SAT	Score:	2100-2200
Avg.	Official	SAT Avg.	Official	ACT SAT	Conversion Projected	Gain
2128 33 2210~2250 82~122
Official	SAT	Score:	<2100
Avg.	Official	SAT Avg.	Official	ACT SAT	Conversion Projected	Gain
1982 31 2110~2140 128~158
52	
102	
143	 136	
0	
20	
40	
60	
80	
100	
120	
140	
160	
2200+	 2100-2200	 <2100	 Overall	
Gains	vs.	Official	SAT	Range
Case Study 1- Daniel Jeon
Daniel Jeon (12)
SAT Evaluation 1750
SAT Official 2040
ACT Prep. Duration 5 sessions, 7 practice tests
ACT Official 34
Acquired Gain 240 points
Case Study 2- Amanda Lew
Amanda Lew (11)
SAT Evaluation 1460
SAT Official 1830
ACT Prep. Duration 8 sessions, 8 practice tests
ACT Official 30
Acquired Gain 220 points
Case Study 3- Brian Chung
Brian Chung (11)
SAT Evaluation 1790
SAT Official 2290
ACT Prep. Duration 3 day special program- 4 full length tests
ACT Official 36
Acquired Gain 90
What’s my winning Strategy?
—  Supplementing ACT after SAT is the
proven way to put your best foot forward
—  Taking the ACT, SAT, or SAT and ACT dual
programs depends on a few factors
◦  Initial Evaluation
◦  Performance
◦  School grades (GPA), performance in different
subjects
◦  Motivation/ Work Ethic/ Desire
Core Requirements for Success
Score
Improvement
Content
Motivation
and
Confidence
Work
Ethic and
Study
Habits
Practice

More Related Content

Similar to How to Choose Between the SAT and ACT for College Admissions

SAT presentation of teacher's module pdf
SAT presentation of teacher's module pdfSAT presentation of teacher's module pdf
SAT presentation of teacher's module pdfShivamMishra465316
 
Sat act powerpoint
Sat act powerpointSat act powerpoint
Sat act powerpointlcg22
 
SAT TRAINING :- SAT EXAM PATTERN, SYLLABUS & QUESTIONS
SAT TRAINING :- SAT EXAM PATTERN, SYLLABUS & QUESTIONSSAT TRAINING :- SAT EXAM PATTERN, SYLLABUS & QUESTIONS
SAT TRAINING :- SAT EXAM PATTERN, SYLLABUS & QUESTIONSGlobal Opportunities
 
Scoring Sat Practice Test (1)
Scoring Sat Practice Test (1)Scoring Sat Practice Test (1)
Scoring Sat Practice Test (1)RebecaJtiva
 
Assessment of Student Learning
Assessment of Student LearningAssessment of Student Learning
Assessment of Student LearningCarlo Casumpong
 
6 reading practice test for the SSAT upper
6 reading practice test for the SSAT upper6 reading practice test for the SSAT upper
6 reading practice test for the SSAT upperGLEN Education
 
Calallen parent night staar high school 2012
Calallen parent night staar high school 2012Calallen parent night staar high school 2012
Calallen parent night staar high school 2012rsendejo
 
Smart Strategy for SAT Preparation
Smart Strategy for SAT PreparationSmart Strategy for SAT Preparation
Smart Strategy for SAT PreparationSocratoSocrato
 
SIMS at Featherstone High
SIMS at Featherstone HighSIMS at Featherstone High
SIMS at Featherstone HighNeil
 
ebookggj higuigyfhuuhfffihgffuuytrfhhffhhg
ebookggj higuigyfhuuhfffihgffuuytrfhhffhhgebookggj higuigyfhuuhfffihgffuuytrfhhffhhg
ebookggj higuigyfhuuhfffihgffuuytrfhhffhhgMallepallyChakravard
 
Sat act overview
Sat act overviewSat act overview
Sat act overviewSal VB Vaid
 
Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches
Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy CoachesAccountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches
Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coachesemengist
 
Michigan High School Testing Information Night
Michigan High School Testing Information NightMichigan High School Testing Information Night
Michigan High School Testing Information Nightmsweducational
 
Jmet Ppt1 Intro
Jmet   Ppt1 IntroJmet   Ppt1 Intro
Jmet Ppt1 Introkapil1312
 
Advanced Mathematics Program 8
Advanced Mathematics Program 8Advanced Mathematics Program 8
Advanced Mathematics Program 8Lade Asrah Carim
 
Unofficial Transcript- 02.29.16
Unofficial Transcript- 02.29.16Unofficial Transcript- 02.29.16
Unofficial Transcript- 02.29.16Arshia Sasson
 
Developmental Education Taskforce Recommendations january 2013
Developmental Education Taskforce Recommendations january 2013Developmental Education Taskforce Recommendations january 2013
Developmental Education Taskforce Recommendations january 2013cccscoetc
 

Similar to How to Choose Between the SAT and ACT for College Admissions (20)

SAT presentation of teacher's module pdf
SAT presentation of teacher's module pdfSAT presentation of teacher's module pdf
SAT presentation of teacher's module pdf
 
Sat act powerpoint
Sat act powerpointSat act powerpoint
Sat act powerpoint
 
SAT TRAINING :- SAT EXAM PATTERN, SYLLABUS & QUESTIONS
SAT TRAINING :- SAT EXAM PATTERN, SYLLABUS & QUESTIONSSAT TRAINING :- SAT EXAM PATTERN, SYLLABUS & QUESTIONS
SAT TRAINING :- SAT EXAM PATTERN, SYLLABUS & QUESTIONS
 
Scoring Sat Practice Test (1)
Scoring Sat Practice Test (1)Scoring Sat Practice Test (1)
Scoring Sat Practice Test (1)
 
Assessment of Student Learning
Assessment of Student LearningAssessment of Student Learning
Assessment of Student Learning
 
6 reading practice test for the SSAT upper
6 reading practice test for the SSAT upper6 reading practice test for the SSAT upper
6 reading practice test for the SSAT upper
 
Calallen parent night staar high school 2012
Calallen parent night staar high school 2012Calallen parent night staar high school 2012
Calallen parent night staar high school 2012
 
Smart Strategy for SAT Preparation
Smart Strategy for SAT PreparationSmart Strategy for SAT Preparation
Smart Strategy for SAT Preparation
 
SIMS at Featherstone High
SIMS at Featherstone HighSIMS at Featherstone High
SIMS at Featherstone High
 
ebookggj higuigyfhuuhfffihgffuuytrfhhffhhg
ebookggj higuigyfhuuhfffihgffuuytrfhhffhhgebookggj higuigyfhuuhfffihgffuuytrfhhffhhg
ebookggj higuigyfhuuhfffihgffuuytrfhhffhhg
 
Sat act overview
Sat act overviewSat act overview
Sat act overview
 
Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches
Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy CoachesAccountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches
Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches
 
Michigan High School Testing Information Night
Michigan High School Testing Information NightMichigan High School Testing Information Night
Michigan High School Testing Information Night
 
Jmet Ppt1 Intro
Jmet   Ppt1 IntroJmet   Ppt1 Intro
Jmet Ppt1 Intro
 
SAT vs. ACT
SAT vs. ACTSAT vs. ACT
SAT vs. ACT
 
Advanced Mathematics Program 8
Advanced Mathematics Program 8Advanced Mathematics Program 8
Advanced Mathematics Program 8
 
Unofficial Transcript- 02.29.16
Unofficial Transcript- 02.29.16Unofficial Transcript- 02.29.16
Unofficial Transcript- 02.29.16
 
Developmental Education Taskforce Recommendations january 2013
Developmental Education Taskforce Recommendations january 2013Developmental Education Taskforce Recommendations january 2013
Developmental Education Taskforce Recommendations january 2013
 
ACT-SAT Comparison
ACT-SAT ComparisonACT-SAT Comparison
ACT-SAT Comparison
 
Corrected-PPT.pptx
Corrected-PPT.pptxCorrected-PPT.pptx
Corrected-PPT.pptx
 

Recently uploaded

Active Learning Strategies (in short ALS).pdf
Active Learning Strategies (in short ALS).pdfActive Learning Strategies (in short ALS).pdf
Active Learning Strategies (in short ALS).pdfPatidar M
 
BIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptx
BIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptxBIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptx
BIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptxSayali Powar
 
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemConcurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemChristalin Nelson
 
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing Postmodern Elements in Literature.pptx
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing  Postmodern Elements in  Literature.pptxUnraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing  Postmodern Elements in  Literature.pptx
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing Postmodern Elements in Literature.pptxDhatriParmar
 
Transaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management SystemTransaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management SystemChristalin Nelson
 
ESP 4-EDITED.pdfmmcncncncmcmmnmnmncnmncmnnjvnnv
ESP 4-EDITED.pdfmmcncncncmcmmnmnmncnmncmnnjvnnvESP 4-EDITED.pdfmmcncncncmcmmnmnmncnmncmnnjvnnv
ESP 4-EDITED.pdfmmcncncncmcmmnmnmncnmncmnnjvnnvRicaMaeCastro1
 
Q4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptx
Q4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptxQ4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptx
Q4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptxlancelewisportillo
 
Scientific Writing :Research Discourse
Scientific  Writing :Research  DiscourseScientific  Writing :Research  Discourse
Scientific Writing :Research DiscourseAnita GoswamiGiri
 
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQ-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQuiz Club NITW
 
CHEST Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation.pptx
CHEST Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation.pptxCHEST Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation.pptx
CHEST Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation.pptxAneriPatwari
 
Tree View Decoration Attribute in the Odoo 17
Tree View Decoration Attribute in the Odoo 17Tree View Decoration Attribute in the Odoo 17
Tree View Decoration Attribute in the Odoo 17Celine George
 
ICS 2208 Lecture Slide Notes for Topic 6
ICS 2208 Lecture Slide Notes for Topic 6ICS 2208 Lecture Slide Notes for Topic 6
ICS 2208 Lecture Slide Notes for Topic 6Vanessa Camilleri
 
31 ĐỀ THI THỬ VÀO LỚP 10 - TIẾNG ANH - FORM MỚI 2025 - 40 CÂU HỎI - BÙI VĂN V...
31 ĐỀ THI THỬ VÀO LỚP 10 - TIẾNG ANH - FORM MỚI 2025 - 40 CÂU HỎI - BÙI VĂN V...31 ĐỀ THI THỬ VÀO LỚP 10 - TIẾNG ANH - FORM MỚI 2025 - 40 CÂU HỎI - BÙI VĂN V...
31 ĐỀ THI THỬ VÀO LỚP 10 - TIẾNG ANH - FORM MỚI 2025 - 40 CÂU HỎI - BÙI VĂN V...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Q-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQ-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQuiz Club NITW
 
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4JOYLYNSAMANIEGO
 
Congestive Cardiac Failure..presentation
Congestive Cardiac Failure..presentationCongestive Cardiac Failure..presentation
Congestive Cardiac Failure..presentationdeepaannamalai16
 
DIFFERENT BASKETRY IN THE PHILIPPINES PPT.pptx
DIFFERENT BASKETRY IN THE PHILIPPINES PPT.pptxDIFFERENT BASKETRY IN THE PHILIPPINES PPT.pptx
DIFFERENT BASKETRY IN THE PHILIPPINES PPT.pptxMichelleTuguinay1
 
4.9.24 School Desegregation in Boston.pptx
4.9.24 School Desegregation in Boston.pptx4.9.24 School Desegregation in Boston.pptx
4.9.24 School Desegregation in Boston.pptxmary850239
 
ARTERIAL BLOOD GAS ANALYSIS........pptx
ARTERIAL BLOOD  GAS ANALYSIS........pptxARTERIAL BLOOD  GAS ANALYSIS........pptx
ARTERIAL BLOOD GAS ANALYSIS........pptxAneriPatwari
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Active Learning Strategies (in short ALS).pdf
Active Learning Strategies (in short ALS).pdfActive Learning Strategies (in short ALS).pdf
Active Learning Strategies (in short ALS).pdf
 
BIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptx
BIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptxBIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptx
BIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptx
 
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemConcurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
 
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing Postmodern Elements in Literature.pptx
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing  Postmodern Elements in  Literature.pptxUnraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing  Postmodern Elements in  Literature.pptx
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing Postmodern Elements in Literature.pptx
 
Transaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management SystemTransaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management System
 
ESP 4-EDITED.pdfmmcncncncmcmmnmnmncnmncmnnjvnnv
ESP 4-EDITED.pdfmmcncncncmcmmnmnmncnmncmnnjvnnvESP 4-EDITED.pdfmmcncncncmcmmnmnmncnmncmnnjvnnv
ESP 4-EDITED.pdfmmcncncncmcmmnmnmncnmncmnnjvnnv
 
Q4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptx
Q4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptxQ4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptx
Q4-PPT-Music9_Lesson-1-Romantic-Opera.pptx
 
Scientific Writing :Research Discourse
Scientific  Writing :Research  DiscourseScientific  Writing :Research  Discourse
Scientific Writing :Research Discourse
 
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQ-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
 
CHEST Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation.pptx
CHEST Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation.pptxCHEST Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation.pptx
CHEST Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation.pptx
 
Tree View Decoration Attribute in the Odoo 17
Tree View Decoration Attribute in the Odoo 17Tree View Decoration Attribute in the Odoo 17
Tree View Decoration Attribute in the Odoo 17
 
ICS 2208 Lecture Slide Notes for Topic 6
ICS 2208 Lecture Slide Notes for Topic 6ICS 2208 Lecture Slide Notes for Topic 6
ICS 2208 Lecture Slide Notes for Topic 6
 
31 ĐỀ THI THỬ VÀO LỚP 10 - TIẾNG ANH - FORM MỚI 2025 - 40 CÂU HỎI - BÙI VĂN V...
31 ĐỀ THI THỬ VÀO LỚP 10 - TIẾNG ANH - FORM MỚI 2025 - 40 CÂU HỎI - BÙI VĂN V...31 ĐỀ THI THỬ VÀO LỚP 10 - TIẾNG ANH - FORM MỚI 2025 - 40 CÂU HỎI - BÙI VĂN V...
31 ĐỀ THI THỬ VÀO LỚP 10 - TIẾNG ANH - FORM MỚI 2025 - 40 CÂU HỎI - BÙI VĂN V...
 
Q-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQ-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
 
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
Daily Lesson Plan in Mathematics Quarter 4
 
Congestive Cardiac Failure..presentation
Congestive Cardiac Failure..presentationCongestive Cardiac Failure..presentation
Congestive Cardiac Failure..presentation
 
DIFFERENT BASKETRY IN THE PHILIPPINES PPT.pptx
DIFFERENT BASKETRY IN THE PHILIPPINES PPT.pptxDIFFERENT BASKETRY IN THE PHILIPPINES PPT.pptx
DIFFERENT BASKETRY IN THE PHILIPPINES PPT.pptx
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Large Language Models"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Large Language Models"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Large Language Models"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Large Language Models"
 
4.9.24 School Desegregation in Boston.pptx
4.9.24 School Desegregation in Boston.pptx4.9.24 School Desegregation in Boston.pptx
4.9.24 School Desegregation in Boston.pptx
 
ARTERIAL BLOOD GAS ANALYSIS........pptx
ARTERIAL BLOOD  GAS ANALYSIS........pptxARTERIAL BLOOD  GAS ANALYSIS........pptx
ARTERIAL BLOOD GAS ANALYSIS........pptx
 

How to Choose Between the SAT and ACT for College Admissions

  • 1. SAT or ACT? Breaking Myths, Finding Facts, and Planning the Winning Strategy
  • 2. SAT vs.ACT - General Format SAT ACT Length 3 hours, 50 mins (including optional 50 minute essay) 3 hours, 35 mins (including optional 40 minute essay) Structure 4 Sections (Evidence- Based Reading,Writing, Math without calc., Math with calc.) 4 Sections (English, Math, Reading, Science) + Optional Essay. Scoring SAT ACT Score Out of 1600. 800 for Math and 800 for Reading+Writing. Optional Essay receives separate score, and subscores/ insight scores are available. No guessing penalty. Composite score on a scale of 1-36 (average of all sections). Essay contributes to ELA score. No guessing penalty. Reporting Scores You decide which full score(s) to send You decide which full score(s) to send
  • 3. SAT vs.ACT- Content SAT ACT Critical Reading More vocabulary, evidence gathering More basic fact, less inference Math Until end of Algebra II (including Trigonometry). Increased focus on Data Analysis and Algebraic thinking. Until end of Algebra II. Few topics appear on ACT that do not on the SAT (all of conics, matrices, etc.). Scope more broadly distributed. Writing More word usage questions, bigger scope of grammar rules, ~50% of rhetoric questions. Lesser scope of grammar rules tested, less rhetoric questions percentage than SAT, more questions and repetition. Science Not tested, but Insight Score for Science is provided. Analysis, Interpretation, Evaluation, and Problem Solving. Essay Read passage and explain authors argument Analyze 3 perspectivesà state your own
  • 4. MEK SAT Program – How Effective? —  MEK Way ◦  Dedicated and highly-trained instructors ◦  Emphasis on student’s goals ◦  Analysis of each student’s character and weakness ◦  Fostering and rigorous environment with high expectations ◦  Emphasis on the development of study skills and work ethic; within and outside of MEK.
  • 6. MEK SAT- Analysis —  114 students committed themselves for MEK Summer SAT program. ◦  7 week, daily course designed to introduce, instill and reinforce the MEK philosophy to support score progression. —  Custom designed SAT materials and daily structure. —  Initial evaluation scores ranged from 1000-2100 (class placement and strategy to support all levels) Semester # of Students Summer Only 38 Summer + Fall 76 Fall Only 38 Total  152
  • 7. 1250 1450 1650 1850 2050 2250 Eval Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 4 Test 5 Super Score Overall Score Improvement 1850+ 1600-1850 1400-1600 <1400
  • 8. Eval. Range Improvement from super score Improvement from highest test 1850+ 254 215 1600-1850 405 355 1400-1600 369 341 <1400 371 345 Overall 339 301 254 405 369 371 339 215 355 341 345 301 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 1850+ 1600-1850 1400-1600 <1400 Overall Eval Score Total Improvement
  • 9. 18 16 25 28 21 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 <200 200-275 275-350 350-475 475+ # of St. Improvement Range DistribuFon of Improvement
  • 10. Fall planning: the key to consistency —  No official test offered in summer. —  Fall time introduces many new variables, most of which work to negatively affect the score gains from summer if not handled correctly. Eval: 1850+   Critical Reading Math Writing Total Summer Super 742 760 702 2203 Fall Peak 765 788 738 2250 Eval: 1600-1850 Summer Super 713 751 662 2126 Fall Peak 679 772 660 2075 Eval: 1400-1600 Summer Super 632 675 591 1898 Fall Peak 633 737 630 1907 Eval: <1400 Summer Super 521 615 507 1643 Fall Peak 560 628 508 1670
  • 11. Official SAT Result Analysis 663 748 711 764 594 757 CR, Eval CR, Official M, Eval M, Official W, Eval W, Official Eval. vs. Official: 1850+ 581 689 653 744 513 693 CR, Eval CR, Official M, Eval M, Official W, Eval W, Official Eval. vs. Official: 1600-1850
  • 12. 513 667 558 676 443 666 CR, Eval CR, Official M, Eval M, Official W, Eval W, Official Eval. vs. Official: 1400-1600 474 595 498 700 372 620 CR, Eval CR, Official M, Eval M, Official W, Eval W, Official Eval. vs. Official: <1400
  • 13. 1972 2265 1746 2097 1514 1965 1344 1906 1750 2121 1850+, Eval 1850+, Official 1600-1850, Eval 1600-1850, Official 1400-1600, Eval 1400-1600, Official <1400, Eval <1400, Official All, Eval All, Official Official Scores vs. Eval Ranges Range Eval Official Change 1850+ 1972 2265 293 1600-1850 1746 2097 351 1400-1600 1514 1965 451 <1400 1344 1906 562 Overall 1750 2121 371
  • 14. Preparation = Improvement 388 368 294 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 Summer+Fall Summer Only Fall Only Improvement based on Preparation Range Eval Official Change Summer+Fall 1755 2143 388 Summer Only 1834 2202 368 Fall Only 1622 1916 294
  • 15. MEK Winning Strategy —  SAT skills for training and use ACT score for application —  SAT content foundation translates well to ACT demands ◦  SAT’s demand for some skills at a more rigorous level than ACT ◦  Short prep duration- foundation is laid! ◦  Colleges accept either score! ◦  Put your best foot forward
  • 16. SAT à ACT Data —  Starting Point (Official SAT) —  Ending Point (ACT) Subject CR M W T Score 671 723 721 2094 Subject English Math Reading Composite Score 33 33 32 33
  • 17. How much did it help?   SAT Score ACT Score ACT Score’s SAT Equiv. Change Critical Reading 671 32 720 ~49 Math 723 33 740 ~17 Writing 721 33 740 ~19 Total 2094 33 2210~2250 ~116-156 49 17 19 136 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 CR M W T Projected Gains
  • 18. Official SAT Score: 2200+ Avg. Official SAT Avg. Official ACT SAT Conversion Projected Gain 2273 35 2300~2350 27~77 Official SAT Score: 2100-2200 Avg. Official SAT Avg. Official ACT SAT Conversion Projected Gain 2128 33 2210~2250 82~122 Official SAT Score: <2100 Avg. Official SAT Avg. Official ACT SAT Conversion Projected Gain 1982 31 2110~2140 128~158 52 102 143 136 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 2200+ 2100-2200 <2100 Overall Gains vs. Official SAT Range
  • 19. Case Study 1- Daniel Jeon Daniel Jeon (12) SAT Evaluation 1750 SAT Official 2040 ACT Prep. Duration 5 sessions, 7 practice tests ACT Official 34 Acquired Gain 240 points
  • 20. Case Study 2- Amanda Lew Amanda Lew (11) SAT Evaluation 1460 SAT Official 1830 ACT Prep. Duration 8 sessions, 8 practice tests ACT Official 30 Acquired Gain 220 points
  • 21. Case Study 3- Brian Chung Brian Chung (11) SAT Evaluation 1790 SAT Official 2290 ACT Prep. Duration 3 day special program- 4 full length tests ACT Official 36 Acquired Gain 90
  • 22. What’s my winning Strategy? —  Supplementing ACT after SAT is the proven way to put your best foot forward —  Taking the ACT, SAT, or SAT and ACT dual programs depends on a few factors ◦  Initial Evaluation ◦  Performance ◦  School grades (GPA), performance in different subjects ◦  Motivation/ Work Ethic/ Desire
  • 23. Core Requirements for Success Score Improvement Content Motivation and Confidence Work Ethic and Study Habits Practice