1) The document discusses how to effectively manage digital experience through digital experience management (DEM). It highlights that using multiple disjointed tools to manage digital experience is ineffective and creates problems throughout the application lifecycle.
2) It introduces Riverbed SteelCentral as an integrated DEM solution that provides end-to-end visibility from end users and applications to networks and infrastructure to help understand and resolve issues impacting digital experience.
3) The document recommends additional resources like whitepapers and free trials to learn more about DEM and Riverbed SteelCentral DEM solutions.
Digital Transformation is pervasive and highly relevant
Over 2 thirds of CEO of large corporations have it aa par of their main strategy
The vast majority believe it can help them competitively
And almost of third of executive see it as a matte of survival
Despite the recognition of the importance of Digital Experience Management and managing DE….the vast majority of companies out there are no adequately equipped to effectively manage DEM with only 5% of companies WW having the right solution in place.
Digital Experience Management is the superset of internal user experience management and external customer experience management—both of which are often combined as end-user-experience management or EUEM. In our research we found that the most successful IT initiatives were those devoted to digital experience management or (DEM).
What’s critical to understand about DEM is that it is multi-faceted with strong values not only in performance management, but also in delivering business impact and business outcomes. Other areas of criticality are assessing the impacts of changes including those relevant to migrations to cloud; assessing the effectiveness of application design overall as users navigate across menus and other screens; measuring user productivity—so relevant to improving business process efficiencies; and understanding service usage as it may apply to value and cost.
The overall message here is that DEM is, or at least should be, a shared initiative between IT and business stakeholders. In our research, those who viewed it as an evenly shared effort were also the most successful.
This slide reflects a challenge- because effectively all of these areas of instrumentation are critical. And yet the percentages strongly indicate less than a third are typically instrumented in most IT environments.
Here we see the tooling categories most often used to quantify the digital experience.
Transactional reconstruction– typically done by tagging technologies and network-focused solutions– lead the list, with synthetics, and network-specific measurements also near the top of the list.
Code injection, functional testing, and passive or “observed” transaction monitoring are commonly used as well.
Looking at the wide variety of instrumentation points and tooling shown here, it is important to note that one size does NOT fit all.
Each type of tool has a sweet spot use case. Applications delivered on premises, for example, can be directly instrumented via agents or other means, so transactional reconstruction may work well for these types of deployments.
On the other hand, applications delivered by a public cloud SaaS provider cannot be fully instrumented. For this reason, synthetic transactions are heavily utilized for quantifying SaaS performance.
Likewise, the digital experience of internal users can be quantified via agents installed at endpoint devices, while code injection is one of the few ways available to quantify the experience of external users accessing a business’s website.
It’s important to keep these factors in mind as you view the adoption rates shown here. They depend as much on the types of applications being tracked as on the popularity or efficiency of a given type of tool.
The challenges reflected here are telling because they combine traditional technical issues—such as root cause-–which clearly haven’t gone away, with issues of communication between IT and the business, understanding usage and value, measuring DEM across the extended enterprise, and getting better insight at the heart of the matter from a different perspective– understanding true end-user satisfaction. This can be especially challenging because users are not the same, and what’s satisfactory to one may not be satisfactory for another.
Once again, this slide highlights the multi-faceted nature of DEM, in balancing process and organizational coordination with selectivity in technology investments and prioritizing which applications to target first for DEM initiatives. It also underscores the critical role of DEM by suggesting that executive buy-in is paramount for DEM success.
EMA’s recommendations sum up the need to combine technical with process and communication issues for enabling successful DEM initiatives. But perhaps the biggest message overall is don’t run away from digital experience management! As challenging as it is, it is a cornerstone to both IT and digital transformation.
A single issue within the digital application or service delivery can degrade the entire Digital Experience, and can affect other components of the chain, causing a cascading degradation and sub-par experience.
How does enterprise IT deals with the complexity of managing DE? let’s consider the pitfalls of the typical management approach. Traditionally, IT deployed multiple monitoring tools to monitor each domain, one or more tools for the network, infrastructure, the application, the servers etc. In this approach you end up with dozens of disjointed tools each separately monitoring each domain, often showing no issues, while the end users still complain of poor app performance or service. The result is typically a finger pointing situation where each domain lead will claim that their respective area is not causing the issue while the problem remains unresolved. Why is this approach ineffective in managing DE? The reason is that point solutions are not designed to talk to each other and while they are adequate at monitoring one specific domain, they were never designed to look at the whole system collectively. In order to quickly identify the root cause of an issue, you need the ability to link several detected events that may not individually identify the problem but collectively point to the cause of the degraded of DE.
Problematic Application Lifecycles – understanding, resolving, and improving Digital Experiences are hampered by a lack of visibility into root causes and current performance levels.
Do you understand the current performance levels for all aspects of the digital experience – from end users to applications to network to infrastructure?
Can you easily identify the underlying root cause of performance issues quickly?
Do you know what areas require application acceleration, application refactoring, or new development altogether?
Now that we examined the various different causes of poor DE, it is clear that Integrated Visibility uniquely provided by SteelCentral is CRITICAL for delivering reliable, high quality Digital Experience.
Only with SteelCentral can customers answer multiple questions about the performance of each domain collectively. SteelCentral monitors the entire environment holistically and can pin point issues occurring anywhere in the chain.
18
There are a variety of Riverbed assets available to help you with your DEM strategy. Download the Riverbed DEM Whitepaper, try out Riverbed SteelCentral Aternity or SteelCentral AppInternals, read through more details on Riverbed’s DEM solutions, and read analyst whitepapers like the EMA’s “Best Practices for Successful Digital Experience Management.”
Please click on any of the educational assets listed or visit:
https://www.riverbed.com/solutions/digital-experience-management.html