3. 3
Agenda
• Why?
• What is available?
• What are we looking for?
• What can this look like?
• Which issues remain?
4. 4
Why?
• Observation:
• Massive information on OER available
• Teacher is not aware
– Cannot find it
– Too difficult
5. Voettekst 5
Problem
• Adoption OER is slowed down:
– Teacher is key
– Experiences no support
– Dropping off
http://cricket2007.deviantart.com/art/I-support-you-209794621
6. Voettekst 6
What is already available?
• A lot!
• What is missing?
• Inspiration
12. 12
A Basic Guide to OER
http://www.col.org/resources/publications/Pages/detail.aspx?PID=357
13. 13
Open Education Consortium Toolkit
http://www.oeconsortium.org/resources/toolkits/
14. 14
Dutch SIG Open Education
https://www.surfspace.nl/sig/5-open-education/50-kennismaking/
15. Penn State Research Guides on MOOC
15
http://www.libraries.psu.edu/psul/researchguides/MOOC.html
16. Voettekst 16
What are we looking for?
• Lessons learned from examples:
– Addressing either OER or MOOC or…
– Openness is addressed separately
– Hard to search
– No or basic distinction in level of knowledge
– Project or institution based
– Maintenance!
17. 17
Two phases
• Phase 1: get going
• Phase 2: information needed
• Support for both phases
• Match supply and demand
– Content
– Level
• Version 1: focus on reuse
18. 18
Demand and supply
• Level of knowledge needed
– Per OER aspect
• Level of knowledge present
• Refer to human expert available
19. Voettekst 19
OER aspects
• Licenses / copyrights
• Quality
• Pedagogy / didactics
• Cultural aspects
• Sustainability
• Finding OER
• Implementation approach
• Platforms and systems
• Labeling / metadata
• Accessibility
• Production of OER
• Professionalization