SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 26
Group 6
Ankita Mahajan (110)
  Briji Komban (115)
     Ramya UK (144)
   The Kyoto Protocol is a protocol to the United Nations
    Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), aimed
    at fighting global warming
   The UNFCCC is an international environmental treaty with the
    goal of achieving the "stabilization of greenhouse gas
    concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that
    would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with
    the climate system.“
   The Protocol was initially adopted on 11 December 1997
    in Kyoto, Japan, and entered into force on 16 February 2005
    As of September 2011, 191 states have signed and
    ratified the protocol
Participation in Kyoto Protocol as of 2011




  Brown = Countries that have signed and ratified the treaty
        (Annex I & II countries in dark brown)
  Blue = No intention to ratify at this stage.
  Dark blue = Canada, which withdrew from the Protocol in December 2011.
  Grey = no position taken or position unknown
 Under the Protocol, 37 countries ("Annex I countries")
  commit themselves to a reduction of four greenhouse gases
  (GHG) (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, sulphur
  hexafluoride) and two groups of gases (hydro
  fluorocarbons and per fluorocarbons) produced by them, and
  all member countries give general commitments
 At negotiations, Annex I countries (including the US)
  collectively agreed to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions
  by 5.2% on average for the period 2008-2012.
 Since the US has not ratified the treaty, the collective
  emissions reduction of Annex I Kyoto countries falls from
  5.2 % to 4.2% below base year
  Each Annex I Party has a binding commitment to limit or reduce GHG
   emissions and innovative mechanisms have been established for Parties to
   facilitate compliance with this commitment.
Other commitments include:
• Each Annex I Party must undertake domestic policies and measures to reduce
   GHG emissions and to enhance removals by sinks;
• In implementing these policies and measures, each Annex I Party must strive to
   minimize any adverse impact of these policies and measures on other Parties,
   particularly developing country Parties;
• Annex I Parties must provide additional financial resources to advance the
   implementation of commitments by developing countries;
• Both Annex I and non-Annex I Parties must cooperate in the areas of:
(a) The development, application and diffusion of climate friendly technologies;
(b) Research on and systematic observation of the climate system;
(c) Education, training, and public awareness of climate change;
(d) The improvement of methodologies and data for GHG inventories
Austria – 87%          Liechtenstein – 92%
                       Lithuania – 92%
Belarus – 95%          Luxembourg – 72%
Belgium – 92.5%
                       Netherlands – 94%
Bulgaria – 92%
Canada – 94%           New Zealand – 100%
Croatia – 95%          Norway – 101%
Czech Republic – 92%   Poland – 94%
Denmark – 79%          Portugal – 127%
Estonia – 92%          Romania – 92%
Finland – 100%         Russian Federation – 100%
France – 100%          Slovakia – 92%
Germany – 79%          Slovenia – 92%
Greece – 125%
                       Spain – 115%
Hungary – 94%
Iceland – 110%         Sweden – 104%
Ireland – 113%         United Kingdom – 87.5%
Italy – 93.5%          United States of America – 93%
Five Parties have an alternative base year:
 Bulgaria: 1988;
 Hungary: the average of the years 1985-1987;
 Poland: 1988;
 Romania: 1989;
 Slovenia: 1986
1.   International Emissions Trading (IET)

    Under this mechanism, an Annex I Party may transfer Kyoto units to or
     acquire units from another Annex I Party.
    Emissions trading does not affect the total assigned amount of Annex I
     Parties collectively; rather, it re-distributes the assigned amount among
     them.
    A Party may acquire an unlimited number of units.
    The number of units that a Party may transfer to other Parties
      is limited by the Party’s commitment period reserve (CPR).
    The CPR is the minimum level of units that a Party must hold in its
     national registry at all times. The requirement for each Party to maintain
     a CPR prevents a Party from over-transferring units, and thus impair its
     ability to meet its commitments
2. Joint implementation (JI)

   It is a project-based mechanism by which one Annex I Party can invest in a project
    that reduces emissions or enhances sequestration in another Annex I Party, and
    receive credit for the emission reductions or removals achieved through that
    project.
   The unit associated with JI is called an emission reduction unit (ERU).
   The total projected emission savings from JI by 2012 are about one tenth that of
    the CDM.
   Russia accounts for about two-thirds of these savings, with the remainder divided
    up roughly equally between the Ukraine and the EU's New Member States.
3.   Clean Development Mechanism
    CDM credits may be generated from emission reduction projects or from
     afforestation and reforestation projects in non-Annex I Parties.
    Unlike emissions trading and JI, projects under the CDM create new Kyoto units
     and their acquisition by Annex I Parties increases both the total assigned
     amount available for those Annex I Parties collectively and their allowable level
     of emissions.
    CDM projects result in three types of Kyoto units.
     Certified emission reductions (CERs) are issued for projects that reduce
     emissions
    Temporary CERs (tCERs)
    Long-term CERs (lCERs) both of which may be issued for projects that enhance
     removals through afforestation and reforestation projects.
 National emission targets exclude international aviation
  and shipping
 Land use and forestry (‘sink’ activities) can be used in
  meeting targets
 Common but differentiated responsibility
    Largest share of emissions originated in developed
     countries
    Relatively low emissions in developing countries
    Share of emissions in developing countries will grow
     to meet their social and development needs
 Per capita emissions
   Financial Commitments:
     Developed countries have to pay billions of dollars
     and supply technology to other countries for
     climate related studies. E.g. The Adaptation Fund
   Enforcement:
     If a country is not in compliance with its emissions
      limitation, it is required to make up the difference
      during the 2nd commitment period plus an
      additional 30%
     It will also be suspended from making transfers
      under an emissions trading program
Emissions as a percentage of the global total,
per capita emissions in tons of GHG per capita
   China 15%, 5.8
   United States 16%, 24.1
   European Union 11%, 10.6
   Indonesia 6%, 12.9
   India 5%, 2.1


Source: International Energy Agency (IEA, 2007,p.201)
   Industrialized countries were committed to ‘take
    the lead’ in reducing emissions
   They were required to stabilize their emissions at
    1990 levels by 2000
   Failure to do so made Kyoto move to binding
    commitments
   Developing countries were not subject to emission
    reduction commitments in the first Kyoto
    commitment period
   Clean Development Mechanism was designed to
    limit emissions in developing countries
 The G77 wanted strong uniform emission cuts across the
developed world
 However, countries such as the US made suggestions to
reduce their responsibility to reduce emissions (inclusion
of carbon sinks, ignoring historical emissions)
 Countries over achieving in their first period
commitments were allowed to ‘bank’ their unused
allowances for use in the subsequent period
 The EU suggested a ‘bubble’ commitment
 The US was obliged to cut back emissions more than
other countries
   Exceptions to Kyoto Targets :Belarus, Malta, and Turkey are
    Annex I Parties but do not have Kyoto targets. The US has a
    Kyoto target of a 6% reduction relative to the 1990 level, but
    has not ratified the treaty. But Emissions in the US have
    increased 11% since 1990
   The Energy sector is found to be the largest source of
    emissions
   Due to non-US participation in the Kyoto treaty, cost
    estimates were found to be much lower than those
    estimated in IPCC third assessment report
   For multinationals, the Kyoto Protocol’s entry into force
    means new restrictions, a new source of income, or both
   Companies operating in industrialized countries will be
    subject to the programs developed by those countries to
    meet their Kyoto obligations.
   Companies with facilities in developing countries might be in
    a position to take advantage of a new source of “carbon”
    financing through the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)
    Example: Through their Southeast Asian subsidiaries,
    companies such as Unocal have explored ways to use CDM
    transactions to finance new clean energy projects.
   No details on specific policies and measures to meet
    reduction targets
   No commitments from developing nations
   No details on implementing permits system
    including penalties
   No details on funding mechanisms for developing
    nations
   ‘bunkers fuels’ issue unresolved (i.e. The fuel used in
    shipping and air travels)
The United States has not ratified the Kyoto Protocol, but it
  hasn't withdrawn from it, either
 The main objection of the US to ratification is regarding the
  nature of participation of developing countries. The US will
  not ratify the Protocol unless developing countries are also
  required to keep greenhouse gas levels at targeted
  minimums.
 The US feels that the Kyoto Protocol is unfair in that
  countries like itself will be harmed economically because
  they will have to make the most changes in order to adhere
  to targeted levels of CO2 levels set forth in the Kyoto
  Protocol.
   May 2011: Russia, Japan and Canada told the G8 they would
    not join a second round of carbon cuts under the Kyoto
    Protocol at United Nations talks and the US reiterated it
    would remain outside the treaty. They argued that the Kyoto
    format did not require developing countries, including China,
    the world’s No. 1 carbon emitter, to make targeted emission
    cuts
   Aug 2011: The European Union, the major developing
    countries, and most African and Pacific island nations
    declared that they would like to see the Kyoto process
    extended as a prelude to a more ambitious, binding
    international agreement that would take effect by 2020
   A primary focus of the conference was to secure a global
    climate agreement as the Kyoto Protocol's first commitment
    period (2008–2012) was about to end
   Also expected to focus on finalising at least some of the
    Cancun Agreements such as co-operation on clean
    technology, as well as forest protection, adaptation to
    climate impacts, etc
   Canada's environment minister Peter Kent announced his
    country's withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol
   After two weeks of negotiations a deal was reached only on the
    last day, Sunday 11 December, after a 60-hour marathon
    negotiation session. Negotiators agreed to be part of a legally
    binding treaty to address global warming

   The terms of the future treaty are to be defined by 2015 and
    become effective in 2020.
   The agreement, referred to as the "Durban platform" includes
    developing countries such as China and India, as well as the US
    which refused to sign the Kyoto Protocol
   Green fund : The conference led to progress regarding the
    creation of a Green Climate Fund for which a management
    framework was adopted. The fund is to distribute US$100bn per
    year to help poor countries adapt to climate impact
   India will not sign any legally binding global agreement
    for emission reduction as the country needs to eradicate
    poverty through economic growth
   India argues that since the CO2 in the atmosphere is
    from developed countries it is their responsibility to cut
    down the emissions. However India will make all efforts
    to cut down on green house gas emissions but that
    would be voluntary
    India being a developing country is still not stable
    enough to take up global warming as the emission cuts
    will slow down its development and cripple it
    economically
Open to Feedback…

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Paris agreement
Paris agreementParis agreement
Paris agreement
 
The Kyoto Protocol
The Kyoto ProtocolThe Kyoto Protocol
The Kyoto Protocol
 
Kyoto Protocol
Kyoto ProtocolKyoto Protocol
Kyoto Protocol
 
Climate change and Paris Agreement
Climate change and Paris AgreementClimate change and Paris Agreement
Climate change and Paris Agreement
 
climate change Policy
climate change Policyclimate change Policy
climate change Policy
 
Kyoto protocol (Pre/Post)
Kyoto protocol (Pre/Post)Kyoto protocol (Pre/Post)
Kyoto protocol (Pre/Post)
 
Introduction to the Paris Agreement
Introduction to the Paris AgreementIntroduction to the Paris Agreement
Introduction to the Paris Agreement
 
Montreal protocol
Montreal protocolMontreal protocol
Montreal protocol
 
Rio summit
Rio summitRio summit
Rio summit
 
About the Montreal Protocol
About the Montreal ProtocolAbout the Montreal Protocol
About the Montreal Protocol
 
Ozone Depletion and the Montreal Protocol
Ozone Depletion and the Montreal ProtocolOzone Depletion and the Montreal Protocol
Ozone Depletion and the Montreal Protocol
 
Earth summit
Earth  summitEarth  summit
Earth summit
 
Carbon Trading
Carbon TradingCarbon Trading
Carbon Trading
 
Agenda 21
Agenda 21Agenda 21
Agenda 21
 
kyoto protocol & its impact on india
kyoto protocol & its impact on indiakyoto protocol & its impact on india
kyoto protocol & its impact on india
 
IPCC Role and Activities
IPCC Role and ActivitiesIPCC Role and Activities
IPCC Role and Activities
 
UNEP
UNEPUNEP
UNEP
 
Earth summit
Earth summitEarth summit
Earth summit
 
Clean development mechanism in india
Clean development mechanism in indiaClean development mechanism in india
Clean development mechanism in india
 
INtroduction to IPCC
INtroduction to IPCCINtroduction to IPCC
INtroduction to IPCC
 

Similar to Kyoto protocol

KYOTO PROTOCOL.pptx
KYOTO PROTOCOL.pptxKYOTO PROTOCOL.pptx
KYOTO PROTOCOL.pptxAWais993227
 
Environmental rule
Environmental ruleEnvironmental rule
Environmental ruleKanwalNisa1
 
Kyoto Protocol to The UNFCCC by Md Sohrab Hossain
Kyoto Protocol to The UNFCCC by Md Sohrab HossainKyoto Protocol to The UNFCCC by Md Sohrab Hossain
Kyoto Protocol to The UNFCCC by Md Sohrab HossainMd Sohrab Hossain
 
Emerging Trends in Environmental Management
Emerging Trends in Environmental ManagementEmerging Trends in Environmental Management
Emerging Trends in Environmental ManagementGAURAV. H .TANDON
 
The_Paris_Climate_Accord.pptx
The_Paris_Climate_Accord.pptxThe_Paris_Climate_Accord.pptx
The_Paris_Climate_Accord.pptxHassan AGOUZOUL
 
COP 21 and Spanish position on climate agreements (BC3 Summer School _July 2015)
COP 21 and Spanish position on climate agreements (BC3 Summer School _July 2015)COP 21 and Spanish position on climate agreements (BC3 Summer School _July 2015)
COP 21 and Spanish position on climate agreements (BC3 Summer School _July 2015)BC3 - Basque Center for Climate Change
 
Climate change: Questions and Answers
Climate change: Questions and Answers Climate change: Questions and Answers
Climate change: Questions and Answers europe_in_israel
 
Carbon credit
Carbon creditCarbon credit
Carbon creditharsh97
 
WWF: Policy Expectations for COP 19 Warsaw
WWF: Policy Expectations for COP 19 WarsawWWF: Policy Expectations for COP 19 Warsaw
WWF: Policy Expectations for COP 19 WarsawWWF ITALIA
 
CCCN GROUP ASSIGNMENT No-4.pptx
CCCN GROUP ASSIGNMENT No-4.pptxCCCN GROUP ASSIGNMENT No-4.pptx
CCCN GROUP ASSIGNMENT No-4.pptxAditya Mane
 
Citizen act ang_kyoto_protocol
Citizen act ang_kyoto_protocolCitizen act ang_kyoto_protocol
Citizen act ang_kyoto_protocolCITIZEN ACT
 
International Responses (Part 1)
International Responses (Part 1)International Responses (Part 1)
International Responses (Part 1)LEEENNA
 

Similar to Kyoto protocol (20)

KYOTO PROTOCOL.pptx
KYOTO PROTOCOL.pptxKYOTO PROTOCOL.pptx
KYOTO PROTOCOL.pptx
 
Kyoto protocol
Kyoto protocolKyoto protocol
Kyoto protocol
 
Environmental rule
Environmental ruleEnvironmental rule
Environmental rule
 
Kyoto Protocol to The UNFCCC by Md Sohrab Hossain
Kyoto Protocol to The UNFCCC by Md Sohrab HossainKyoto Protocol to The UNFCCC by Md Sohrab Hossain
Kyoto Protocol to The UNFCCC by Md Sohrab Hossain
 
Nama to indc
Nama to indcNama to indc
Nama to indc
 
Kyoto protocol
Kyoto protocolKyoto protocol
Kyoto protocol
 
Emerging Trends in Environmental Management
Emerging Trends in Environmental ManagementEmerging Trends in Environmental Management
Emerging Trends in Environmental Management
 
The_Paris_Climate_Accord.pptx
The_Paris_Climate_Accord.pptxThe_Paris_Climate_Accord.pptx
The_Paris_Climate_Accord.pptx
 
COP 21 and Spanish position on climate agreements (BC3 Summer School _July 2015)
COP 21 and Spanish position on climate agreements (BC3 Summer School _July 2015)COP 21 and Spanish position on climate agreements (BC3 Summer School _July 2015)
COP 21 and Spanish position on climate agreements (BC3 Summer School _July 2015)
 
Kyoto and Beyond
Kyoto and BeyondKyoto and Beyond
Kyoto and Beyond
 
Climate change: Questions and Answers
Climate change: Questions and Answers Climate change: Questions and Answers
Climate change: Questions and Answers
 
Carbon credit
Carbon creditCarbon credit
Carbon credit
 
WWF: Policy Expectations for COP 19 Warsaw
WWF: Policy Expectations for COP 19 WarsawWWF: Policy Expectations for COP 19 Warsaw
WWF: Policy Expectations for COP 19 Warsaw
 
Climate Equity
Climate EquityClimate Equity
Climate Equity
 
CCCN GROUP ASSIGNMENT No-4.pptx
CCCN GROUP ASSIGNMENT No-4.pptxCCCN GROUP ASSIGNMENT No-4.pptx
CCCN GROUP ASSIGNMENT No-4.pptx
 
Kyoto protocol
Kyoto protocolKyoto protocol
Kyoto protocol
 
Investment Funds - Carbon Funds
Investment Funds - Carbon FundsInvestment Funds - Carbon Funds
Investment Funds - Carbon Funds
 
Team 1.pptx
Team 1.pptxTeam 1.pptx
Team 1.pptx
 
Citizen act ang_kyoto_protocol
Citizen act ang_kyoto_protocolCitizen act ang_kyoto_protocol
Citizen act ang_kyoto_protocol
 
International Responses (Part 1)
International Responses (Part 1)International Responses (Part 1)
International Responses (Part 1)
 

More from Ruchir Shukla (20)

United nations
United nationsUnited nations
United nations
 
Forex risk mgmnt
Forex risk mgmntForex risk mgmnt
Forex risk mgmnt
 
Group 5 global sourcing ib final
Group 5   global sourcing ib finalGroup 5   global sourcing ib final
Group 5 global sourcing ib final
 
Wto
WtoWto
Wto
 
Trade barriers final
Trade barriers finalTrade barriers final
Trade barriers final
 
Opec
OpecOpec
Opec
 
Nafta pgdm b-(118,134,145)
Nafta pgdm b-(118,134,145)Nafta pgdm b-(118,134,145)
Nafta pgdm b-(118,134,145)
 
Mercosur
MercosurMercosur
Mercosur
 
Ipr trips&trims
Ipr trips&trimsIpr trips&trims
Ipr trips&trims
 
Ib venezuela-group-9
Ib venezuela-group-9Ib venezuela-group-9
Ib venezuela-group-9
 
Group 5 global sourcing ib final
Group 5   global sourcing ib finalGroup 5   global sourcing ib final
Group 5 global sourcing ib final
 
Forex risk mgmnt
Forex risk mgmntForex risk mgmnt
Forex risk mgmnt
 
Final ib pptx
Final ib pptxFinal ib pptx
Final ib pptx
 
Eu (1)
Eu (1)Eu (1)
Eu (1)
 
Cis
CisCis
Cis
 
China group 14-pg-b
China group 14-pg-bChina group 14-pg-b
China group 14-pg-b
 
Apec ppt
Apec pptApec ppt
Apec ppt
 
World bank
World bankWorld bank
World bank
 
Israel
IsraelIsrael
Israel
 
The great train robbery of 1963
The great train robbery of 1963The great train robbery of 1963
The great train robbery of 1963
 

Recently uploaded

Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024Victor Rentea
 
Six Myths about Ontologies: The Basics of Formal Ontology
Six Myths about Ontologies: The Basics of Formal OntologySix Myths about Ontologies: The Basics of Formal Ontology
Six Myths about Ontologies: The Basics of Formal Ontologyjohnbeverley2021
 
Platformless Horizons for Digital Adaptability
Platformless Horizons for Digital AdaptabilityPlatformless Horizons for Digital Adaptability
Platformless Horizons for Digital AdaptabilityWSO2
 
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024Victor Rentea
 
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...apidays
 
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of TerraformAWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of TerraformAndrey Devyatkin
 
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerHow to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerThousandEyes
 
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 AmsterdamDEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 AmsterdamUiPathCommunity
 
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...apidays
 
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost SavingRepurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost SavingEdi Saputra
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMESafe Software
 
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor PresentationDBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor PresentationDropbox
 
Biography Of Angeliki Cooney | Senior Vice President Life Sciences | Albany, ...
Biography Of Angeliki Cooney | Senior Vice President Life Sciences | Albany, ...Biography Of Angeliki Cooney | Senior Vice President Life Sciences | Albany, ...
Biography Of Angeliki Cooney | Senior Vice President Life Sciences | Albany, ...Angeliki Cooney
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, AdobeApidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobeapidays
 
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWEREMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWERMadyBayot
 
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdfRising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdfOrbitshub
 
Vector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptx
Vector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptxVector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptx
Vector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptxRemote DBA Services
 
[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf
[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf
[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdfSandro Moreira
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...apidays
 
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century educationpresentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century educationjfdjdjcjdnsjd
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
 
Six Myths about Ontologies: The Basics of Formal Ontology
Six Myths about Ontologies: The Basics of Formal OntologySix Myths about Ontologies: The Basics of Formal Ontology
Six Myths about Ontologies: The Basics of Formal Ontology
 
Platformless Horizons for Digital Adaptability
Platformless Horizons for Digital AdaptabilityPlatformless Horizons for Digital Adaptability
Platformless Horizons for Digital Adaptability
 
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
 
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
 
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of TerraformAWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
 
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerHow to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
 
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 AmsterdamDEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
 
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
 
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost SavingRepurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
 
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor PresentationDBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
 
Biography Of Angeliki Cooney | Senior Vice President Life Sciences | Albany, ...
Biography Of Angeliki Cooney | Senior Vice President Life Sciences | Albany, ...Biography Of Angeliki Cooney | Senior Vice President Life Sciences | Albany, ...
Biography Of Angeliki Cooney | Senior Vice President Life Sciences | Albany, ...
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, AdobeApidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
 
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWEREMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
 
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdfRising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
 
Vector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptx
Vector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptxVector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptx
Vector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptx
 
[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf
[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf
[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
 
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century educationpresentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
 

Kyoto protocol

  • 1. Group 6 Ankita Mahajan (110) Briji Komban (115) Ramya UK (144)
  • 2. The Kyoto Protocol is a protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), aimed at fighting global warming  The UNFCCC is an international environmental treaty with the goal of achieving the "stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.“  The Protocol was initially adopted on 11 December 1997 in Kyoto, Japan, and entered into force on 16 February 2005  As of September 2011, 191 states have signed and ratified the protocol
  • 3. Participation in Kyoto Protocol as of 2011 Brown = Countries that have signed and ratified the treaty (Annex I & II countries in dark brown) Blue = No intention to ratify at this stage. Dark blue = Canada, which withdrew from the Protocol in December 2011. Grey = no position taken or position unknown
  • 4.
  • 5.  Under the Protocol, 37 countries ("Annex I countries") commit themselves to a reduction of four greenhouse gases (GHG) (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, sulphur hexafluoride) and two groups of gases (hydro fluorocarbons and per fluorocarbons) produced by them, and all member countries give general commitments  At negotiations, Annex I countries (including the US) collectively agreed to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 5.2% on average for the period 2008-2012.  Since the US has not ratified the treaty, the collective emissions reduction of Annex I Kyoto countries falls from 5.2 % to 4.2% below base year
  • 6.  Each Annex I Party has a binding commitment to limit or reduce GHG emissions and innovative mechanisms have been established for Parties to facilitate compliance with this commitment. Other commitments include: • Each Annex I Party must undertake domestic policies and measures to reduce GHG emissions and to enhance removals by sinks; • In implementing these policies and measures, each Annex I Party must strive to minimize any adverse impact of these policies and measures on other Parties, particularly developing country Parties; • Annex I Parties must provide additional financial resources to advance the implementation of commitments by developing countries; • Both Annex I and non-Annex I Parties must cooperate in the areas of: (a) The development, application and diffusion of climate friendly technologies; (b) Research on and systematic observation of the climate system; (c) Education, training, and public awareness of climate change; (d) The improvement of methodologies and data for GHG inventories
  • 7.
  • 8. Austria – 87% Liechtenstein – 92% Lithuania – 92% Belarus – 95% Luxembourg – 72% Belgium – 92.5% Netherlands – 94% Bulgaria – 92% Canada – 94% New Zealand – 100% Croatia – 95% Norway – 101% Czech Republic – 92% Poland – 94% Denmark – 79% Portugal – 127% Estonia – 92% Romania – 92% Finland – 100% Russian Federation – 100% France – 100% Slovakia – 92% Germany – 79% Slovenia – 92% Greece – 125% Spain – 115% Hungary – 94% Iceland – 110% Sweden – 104% Ireland – 113% United Kingdom – 87.5% Italy – 93.5% United States of America – 93%
  • 9. Five Parties have an alternative base year:  Bulgaria: 1988;  Hungary: the average of the years 1985-1987;  Poland: 1988;  Romania: 1989;  Slovenia: 1986
  • 10. 1. International Emissions Trading (IET)  Under this mechanism, an Annex I Party may transfer Kyoto units to or acquire units from another Annex I Party.  Emissions trading does not affect the total assigned amount of Annex I Parties collectively; rather, it re-distributes the assigned amount among them.  A Party may acquire an unlimited number of units.  The number of units that a Party may transfer to other Parties is limited by the Party’s commitment period reserve (CPR).  The CPR is the minimum level of units that a Party must hold in its national registry at all times. The requirement for each Party to maintain a CPR prevents a Party from over-transferring units, and thus impair its ability to meet its commitments
  • 11. 2. Joint implementation (JI)  It is a project-based mechanism by which one Annex I Party can invest in a project that reduces emissions or enhances sequestration in another Annex I Party, and receive credit for the emission reductions or removals achieved through that project.  The unit associated with JI is called an emission reduction unit (ERU).  The total projected emission savings from JI by 2012 are about one tenth that of the CDM.  Russia accounts for about two-thirds of these savings, with the remainder divided up roughly equally between the Ukraine and the EU's New Member States.
  • 12. 3. Clean Development Mechanism  CDM credits may be generated from emission reduction projects or from afforestation and reforestation projects in non-Annex I Parties.  Unlike emissions trading and JI, projects under the CDM create new Kyoto units and their acquisition by Annex I Parties increases both the total assigned amount available for those Annex I Parties collectively and their allowable level of emissions.  CDM projects result in three types of Kyoto units.  Certified emission reductions (CERs) are issued for projects that reduce emissions  Temporary CERs (tCERs)  Long-term CERs (lCERs) both of which may be issued for projects that enhance removals through afforestation and reforestation projects.
  • 13.  National emission targets exclude international aviation and shipping  Land use and forestry (‘sink’ activities) can be used in meeting targets  Common but differentiated responsibility  Largest share of emissions originated in developed countries  Relatively low emissions in developing countries  Share of emissions in developing countries will grow to meet their social and development needs  Per capita emissions
  • 14. Financial Commitments:  Developed countries have to pay billions of dollars and supply technology to other countries for climate related studies. E.g. The Adaptation Fund  Enforcement:  If a country is not in compliance with its emissions limitation, it is required to make up the difference during the 2nd commitment period plus an additional 30%  It will also be suspended from making transfers under an emissions trading program
  • 15. Emissions as a percentage of the global total, per capita emissions in tons of GHG per capita  China 15%, 5.8  United States 16%, 24.1  European Union 11%, 10.6  Indonesia 6%, 12.9  India 5%, 2.1 Source: International Energy Agency (IEA, 2007,p.201)
  • 16. Industrialized countries were committed to ‘take the lead’ in reducing emissions  They were required to stabilize their emissions at 1990 levels by 2000  Failure to do so made Kyoto move to binding commitments  Developing countries were not subject to emission reduction commitments in the first Kyoto commitment period  Clean Development Mechanism was designed to limit emissions in developing countries
  • 17.  The G77 wanted strong uniform emission cuts across the developed world  However, countries such as the US made suggestions to reduce their responsibility to reduce emissions (inclusion of carbon sinks, ignoring historical emissions)  Countries over achieving in their first period commitments were allowed to ‘bank’ their unused allowances for use in the subsequent period  The EU suggested a ‘bubble’ commitment  The US was obliged to cut back emissions more than other countries
  • 18. Exceptions to Kyoto Targets :Belarus, Malta, and Turkey are Annex I Parties but do not have Kyoto targets. The US has a Kyoto target of a 6% reduction relative to the 1990 level, but has not ratified the treaty. But Emissions in the US have increased 11% since 1990  The Energy sector is found to be the largest source of emissions  Due to non-US participation in the Kyoto treaty, cost estimates were found to be much lower than those estimated in IPCC third assessment report
  • 19. For multinationals, the Kyoto Protocol’s entry into force means new restrictions, a new source of income, or both  Companies operating in industrialized countries will be subject to the programs developed by those countries to meet their Kyoto obligations.  Companies with facilities in developing countries might be in a position to take advantage of a new source of “carbon” financing through the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Example: Through their Southeast Asian subsidiaries, companies such as Unocal have explored ways to use CDM transactions to finance new clean energy projects.
  • 20. No details on specific policies and measures to meet reduction targets  No commitments from developing nations  No details on implementing permits system including penalties  No details on funding mechanisms for developing nations  ‘bunkers fuels’ issue unresolved (i.e. The fuel used in shipping and air travels)
  • 21. The United States has not ratified the Kyoto Protocol, but it hasn't withdrawn from it, either  The main objection of the US to ratification is regarding the nature of participation of developing countries. The US will not ratify the Protocol unless developing countries are also required to keep greenhouse gas levels at targeted minimums.  The US feels that the Kyoto Protocol is unfair in that countries like itself will be harmed economically because they will have to make the most changes in order to adhere to targeted levels of CO2 levels set forth in the Kyoto Protocol.
  • 22. May 2011: Russia, Japan and Canada told the G8 they would not join a second round of carbon cuts under the Kyoto Protocol at United Nations talks and the US reiterated it would remain outside the treaty. They argued that the Kyoto format did not require developing countries, including China, the world’s No. 1 carbon emitter, to make targeted emission cuts  Aug 2011: The European Union, the major developing countries, and most African and Pacific island nations declared that they would like to see the Kyoto process extended as a prelude to a more ambitious, binding international agreement that would take effect by 2020
  • 23. A primary focus of the conference was to secure a global climate agreement as the Kyoto Protocol's first commitment period (2008–2012) was about to end  Also expected to focus on finalising at least some of the Cancun Agreements such as co-operation on clean technology, as well as forest protection, adaptation to climate impacts, etc  Canada's environment minister Peter Kent announced his country's withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol
  • 24. After two weeks of negotiations a deal was reached only on the last day, Sunday 11 December, after a 60-hour marathon negotiation session. Negotiators agreed to be part of a legally binding treaty to address global warming  The terms of the future treaty are to be defined by 2015 and become effective in 2020.  The agreement, referred to as the "Durban platform" includes developing countries such as China and India, as well as the US which refused to sign the Kyoto Protocol  Green fund : The conference led to progress regarding the creation of a Green Climate Fund for which a management framework was adopted. The fund is to distribute US$100bn per year to help poor countries adapt to climate impact
  • 25. India will not sign any legally binding global agreement for emission reduction as the country needs to eradicate poverty through economic growth  India argues that since the CO2 in the atmosphere is from developed countries it is their responsibility to cut down the emissions. However India will make all efforts to cut down on green house gas emissions but that would be voluntary  India being a developing country is still not stable enough to take up global warming as the emission cuts will slow down its development and cripple it economically