3. DEFINITIONS
KROEBER – Anthropology is the science of
groups of men and their behavior and
production.
JACOBS & STERN – Anthropology is the
scientific study of the physical, social, and
cultural development and behavior of human
beings since their appearance on the earth.
7. PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
Physical anthropology is concerned with man as a
physical organism in ‘time’ & ‘space’
Study of the man through evolutionary
processes
study of human populations
BEALS & HOIJER – The study of processes where
by man developed from his non human
ancestors and the continuing process of change
still slowly altering his bodily form.
8. PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
HUMAN GENETICS
E.C.COLIN – Genetics is the branch of biology which deals
with the laws and principles of heredity and variation as
observed in plants, in animals and in human.
HUMAN PALEONTOLOGY
Webster’s New International Dictionary – Human
paleontology is the science that deals with life of the past
geographical periods.
9. PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
ETHNOLOGY
S.S DUBE – Ethnology is a comparative study of the races
and culture of mankind in their different aspects.
ANTHROPOMETRY
HERSKOVITS – The measurements of man
BIOMETRY
CHARLES WINIK – Biometry is the statistical analysis of
biological studies specially as applied to such areas as
disease, birth, growth, and death.
10. Cultural anthropology
E.A . HOEBEL – Culture is the sum total
of learned behavioral patterns
.
1. PREHISTORIC ARCHEOLOGY
BEALS & HOIJER – It deals with ancient
cultures and with past phases of
modern civilization.
.
11. Cultural anthropology
2. SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY
CHARLES WINIK – Social anthropology is
the study of social behavior especially
from the point of view of the systematic
comparative study of social forms and
institutions.
13. Characteristics of primates
1. Limbs - prehensile
2. Thumb / great toe
3. Nails - grasping function
4. Teeth - adopted for mixed food
5. Mammary gland - lactation
6. Brain - well developed
7. Clavicle
15. Classification of primates
1. Prosimian primates ( 60 mil years )
a. lemuroidea - lemur, loris
b. torsoidea - torsier
Earliest true primates
Well developed cerebellar cortices
Limbs had highly mobile joints
Unspecialised tooth cusps
Dental formula – I 2/2 C1/1 PM 3/3 M3/3
16. ANTHROPOIDEA
1. Ceboidea ( Platyrrhine of New World Monkeys)
2. Cercopithecoidea ( Catarrine Of Old World
Monkeys )
3. Hominoidea
17. ANTHROPOIDEA
CEBOIDEA – ( spider monkey )
The higher primates
Dental formula – I 2/2, C1/1, PM2/2, M3/3
4 blunt cusps on molars
20. ANTHROPOIDEA
Pongids ( Great apes )
Ex : Gibbons, Gorillas, Orang-utans, Chimpanzees
Large brains
Pelvic girdle & legs became more robust
Orangutans remained arboreal
Chimpanzees, gorillas are quadripedal
21. HOMINOIDS
AUSTRALOPITHECINES
First bipedal fossil anthropoids found in rocks of Eastern
& South Africa ( 1-3.6 mil years ago )
HOMO ERUCTUS ( Upright man )
HOMOSAPIENS HOMOSAPIENS
SAPIENS
NIANDERTHALENSIS
( Cro-magnon man ) ( Neanderthal man )
22. Neanderthal man
skull-Very large
-Dolico cephalic
-Face is highly developed
with maxillay prognathism
-Lower jaw is strong & large
-chin is less prominent
-human dentition
-canine is of ordinary size
23. Cro-magnon man
Skull–large & massive
-face is short, and flat
-maxillary region
shows less marked
prognathism
-lower jaw is strong
& not massive
-a well marked chin
24. MODERN MAN
Final steps to modern man ( 20 mil years )
1. Remarkable increase in brain size gave the
forehead a more domed appearance
2. Folding of cerebral cortex
3. Bipedal walking
4. Use of hands for manipulation
5. Occipital ridges became small
25. MODERN MAN
7. Simplification of nasal region
8. Reduced prognathism
9. Chin increased
in prominence
10. Angle between
base of the skull and
cervical vertebrae is 900
26. Evolution of human face
Face is the seat of principle sense organs
In lower vertebrates
No fully ossified skeleton
Jaw muscles are merely modified gill arch muscles
Teeth are specialisations of tough shagreen or skin with
minute calcified papillae or denticles
In the amphibians
The bony plates behind the jaws have disappeared, leaving
an exposed area –orbit notch
27. In the fossil, mammal like reptiles
The bony mask of the temporal region is
perforated
Complex dentary – lower jaw
Dentary becomes enlarged & presses external
pterygoid muscle, forming the cushion –
meniscus ( glenoid fossa )
Heat regulating devices
Forward migration of neck muscles
Bony mask was replaced by skin
28. FACIAL FORM
Each person’s face is a custom made original
Anthropologists can reconstructs the face from a
dry skull
The biologic rationale underlying common
variations :
1. Different facial types
2. Male & female developmental facial differences
3. Child & adult facial differences
29. Head form
Two general extremes
Dolicocephalic ( long, narrow )
leptoprosopic
Brachycephalic ( Wide, short, globular )
euryprosopic
30. DOLICOCEPHALIC
Nose is longer &
Protrusive with Aquiline
type of Nasal contour
Convex profile
Cheek bones are less prominent
Longer, narrower, & deeper maxillary arch &
palate
Downward & backward rotation of the mandible
Receding chin
31. BRACHYCEPHALIC
Nose is protrusively
shorter (rounded tip )
Prominent cheek bones
Concave / straight profile
Wider, shorter and more shallow palate and
maxillary arch
Mandible is more protrusive
More prominent chin
32. DINARIC HEAD FORM
Dinaric Alps, Yugoslavia
“Brachycephalised
dolicocephalic”
Flattened occipital regions
Bossing of parietal regions
Skull has triangular configuration
Fore head is sloping & the profile tending towards
orthognathic
Mandible tends to be less retrusive
33. Male versus female features
Size & configuration
of the nose
Fore head
Cheek bones
upper jaw look
more prominent in
females
34. Child versus adult features
Nasal part is small
Dentition ( primary & permanent )
Jaw bones (masticatory musles & airway)
Head form
Sexual dimorphism
35. Child versus adult features
Child’s face is not a miniature of the adult face
1. Forehead
2. Face appears
diminutive in child
3. Nasal region
4. Eyes appears wide set
5. Mandible is small
6. chin is incompletely formed
36. Evolution of teeth
Lobe finned fishes
- upper & lower jaws had bone bearing
plates ( labyrinthodont )
- peg formed teeth
Reptiles & mammals
teeth are set in separate sockets
cone shaped canines
milk teeth & permanent teeth
37. RACE
“A group that differs from other
classes or human group by virtue of some
specific physiological characteristics that
are found uniformly within that group”
- Maclver & page
41. NEGROIDS
African negroes & oceanic negros
woolly or frizzly hair on the head
Black coloured skin
Nose is broad and flat
Lips are thick and everted
Facial prognathism
Brow ridges are small
43. MANGOLOIDS
1. CLASSIC / CENTRAL MANGOLOID
-Northern Chaina, Tibet& Mangolia
2. ARCTIC / ESKIMOID
-Northern Asia, arctic coast of north
America
3. INDONESIAN - MALAY MANGOLOID
-Japan, Thailand, Southern China
4. AMERICAN INDIAN
-North, Middle, and South America
44. CAUCASOID
Skin – fair, olive & all shades of brown
Hair – flat, wavy to various degrees of
curliness
Head form –dolicocephalic to
brachycephalic
Nose – leptorrhine to mesorrhine
Jaws –no prognathism
Chin - pronounced
45. CAUCASOIDS
1. MEDITERRANEAN- all sea shores ( India,
Spain, Portugal, France etc. )
2. NORDIC – Scandinavians, Northern Germany,
Northern France
3. ALPINE – Central Europe
4. EAST BALTIC – North eastern Germany,
Poland, Baltic states
5. DINARIC –Dinaric alps region in Yugoslavia
46. CAUCASOIDS
6. ARMENOIDS – turkey, Syria,Palestine Iraq,
Iran
7. CELTIC – Iceland, Scotland and western
Europe
8. LAPP – Norway, Sweden
9. INDO-DRAVIDIAN –south & central India
10. POLYNESIAN – Polynesian islands of the
pacific e.g. New Zealand
11. AINU – ancient stock of Japan
47. Australoids
They closely resemble the Caucasoids in
many characters
1. Australian aborigins -Australia
2. Pre-Dravidian ( veddoid )- South and
central India including Typical Indian
tribes
48. Races in india
Sir Herbert Risley ( > 75 yrs )
Based on Indo-Aryans ( west )
mangoloids ( east)
Dravidian
Indo Aryan
Mangoloid
49. RACES IN INDIA
Based on the measurements on the samples of
indian population – Risley
1. Turko- iranian – they inhabitat the Baluchistan
( now in Pakistan ). Tall in nature&
brachycephalic
2. Indo- aryan – eastern part of Punjab Rajastan
& Kashmir. Tall & fair complexioned
3. Scytho-dravidian- hilly traces of Madhya
pradesh, & Coorg. Medium statured &
Brachycephalic
50. Aryo- dravidian – U.P. Rajastan & Bihar. Short
statured & mesocephalic
Mangolo- dravidian- Bengal & Orissa Stature is
medium & sometimes short, round headed with
medium nose
Mangoloid – Himalayan regions ( Nepal, Bhutan,
Assam, & North eastern states
51. Dental anthropology
Beginning - Eighties of 18th
century
Recognised - 20th
century
Founder of american journal of physical
anthropology – Ales Hrdlicka
The term dental anthropology was used in
early 1900s
52. Different aspects of anthropology ( applied
anthropology )
Dental development
Dental pathology
Dental morphology
Forensic odontology
odontometry
53. DENTAL DEVELOPMENT
Tooth eruption standards which are
relatively independent of general body
growth and skeletal maturation are of
great significance in the diagnosis &
treatment planning of children with growth
disturbances
protein-calorie malnutrition ( PCM )
54. PATHOLOGY
Dental caries – it is a pathologic condition of the
teeth resulting in the decalcification of the
dentin, enamel and the disintegration of the
remaining organic material often leading to the
loss of teeth.
Caries susceptibility expresses the inherent or
acquired proneness to caries
Low incidence of caries in the prehistoric as also in
the living tribal communities – coarse & fibrous
food products
55. DENTAL MORPHOLOGY
Teeth are best preserved & most easily
accessible anatomical system of the body.
pioneering studies – Hrdlicka, Dahlberg,
Campbell, Hellmen, Krogman, Moorrees
etc.
56. 1.Supernumerary teeth or hyperdontia
- causes dental disturbances by interfering
with normal eruption
- either peg shaped or have large crown
- Higher frequency in the maxilla
-Campbell conducted a study on the skulls
and living Australian aborigines.(1.8% )
57. 2.Carabelli’s cusp or anomaly
Von Carabelli in 1842
Its occurrence – back to paleolithic man
An elevation or tubercle on the lingual surface of
the mesio-lingual cusp of the maxillary molars
particularly the first one
A marker for differentiation between different
ethnic groups.
58. 3.Shovel-shaped incisors
“SHOVELLING” – Muhlreiter ( 1870 )
A condition resulting from a combination of a
concave lingual surface and elevated mesial
and distal marginal ridges enclosing a central
fossa in the upper and lower incisor teeth
Hrdlicka ( 1911 ) had done pioneering work in
dental anthropology and reported pronounced
shovelling in the incisors of american indians
59. Acco. to Hrdlicka – 4 grades of shovelling
1. Shovel- enamel rim has well developed fossa
2. Semi shovel- enamel rim is distinct but with
shallower fossa
3. Trace shovel- enamel rim has distinct traces
4. No shovel- enamel rim has no fossa
HELLMAN –marked, medium, trace, and absent
60. 4.Diastema
It is a space or gap present between the maxillary
central incisors or between the lateral incisors
and canines
Former – median diastema (combined with small
laterla incisors or large labial frenum)
Latter – lateral diastema (found in anthropoid apes
& certain fossil men )
61. 5. Crowding
Lasker – inheritence of large teeth from one
parent and a small jaw from the other
6. Cingulum or lingual cusp
A shelf or swelling which is found on the
tooth just above the central line
Site of development of many supernumerary
cusps
62. 7. Occlusion
Relationship between the masticatory
surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular
teeth when the mouth is closed
-heriditory factors
-environmental factors
The term ‘malocclusion’ is illdefined and
biased - corrucini & whitley
64. FORENSIC ODONTOLOGY
Deals with the identification & study of
human teeth
identification of a person involved in mass
disasters ( autobobile/aircraft accidents,
floods, building collapse and industrial
hazards)
65. ODONTOMETRY
Tooth size standards based on odontometry can
be used in the age & sex determination of
skeletal and also living population
Studies – males have larger teeth (mesio distal
crown diameters )
- canines show greatest amount of
sexual dimorphism
-Europeans have smaller teeth than
mangolians or other racial groups
66. Dr.V. Rami reddy conducted a retrospective cross
sectional study on population of Gulbarga
disrtict (1971-1975)
1. Eruptiion pattern
2. Dental caries
3. Dental morphology
.
.
67. AIMS & OBJECTIVES
1. To indicate the general and detailed eruption
pattern of different types of deciduous and
permanent teeth by variables such as sex, age
and economic status.
2. To indicate the general and detailed
prevalence of caries in both deciduous &
permanent teeth by above variables
3. To indicate the general & detailed frequency
occurrence of various morphological traits.
68. Deciduous & permanent dental eruption
The times of onset as well as completion of
eruption are earlier in females than males
Mandibular teeth precedes over maxillary teeth
in both sexes
Teeth eruption is fast in higher income group
children
69. Dental caries – deciduous dentition
By sex
Male children (33.4%)>female children( 26.8% )
By income
Lower income group > upper income group
By age
Central incisors –5 years
Lateral incisors – 3 years
Canines – 6 years
First & second molars – 7 to 10 years
70. Dental caries – permanent dentition
By sex
Difference is insignificant (females > males )
By income
Upper income group > middle & lower
By age
Incisors – 22 to 23 years
Canines – free from the disease
Premolars & molars – 22-23 years
71. Dental morphology
Supernumerary teeth
Permanent dentition ( 0.86% ) >
deciduous dentition ( 0.06% )
Maxilla > mandible – Ruffer ( 1920 )
Carabelli’s anomaly
35% out of total deciduous teeth& 27% of
permanent dentition
Female > male
73. “Epidemological transition”
Phenomenon of changes in frequencies of
certain serious diseases – omeron (1971)
‘diseases of civilisation’
or
‘western diseases’ – Trowell & Burkitt
74. “Epidemolodic transition in minor diseases”
Chronic allergy – cow’s milk, dust, pollution and
food additives
Oral breathing – facial collapse syndrome
- narrowing of the upper arch
- buccal cross bites
75. Bite force studies
normal adult chewing – 15-17kg of force
maximum - 28-39kg of force
Bite force is relevant to the functional aspects of
dento-facial dysplasia.
Ordinary chewing and maximum bite forces were
significantly higher among more traditional rural
Punjabi youths than among urban youths
- Corruccini & Kaul
76.
77. Solution is the restoration of proper
function by means of chewing hard ,
fibrous foods – stimulate the masticatory
apparatus
- greater flow of the alkaline
saliva
78. Evolution of teeth
Non mammalian vertebrates –
Polyphyodonty
During growth of the animal – increase in
the jaw size is associated with tooth size
(Trout – number will increase )
In mammals –Diphyodonty (2 dentitions )
79. Dentition of fishes ( agnatha )
EX; Sea lamprey
No true calcified teeth
Arranged circumferentially
Horny teeth are also seen on the tongue
80. Chondrichthyes (bony fishes )
All types of dental specialisations
Homodont & polyphyodont
Teeth are covered by enameloid
lower jaw of shark
81. osteochthyes
Haplodont – prehention
Polyphyodont
Teeth- vomer, palatine bones roof of the
mouth & tongue
82. Amphibia
Small, homodont, polyphyodont –
prehension
In the frog – small teeth on the upper jaw
& no teeth on the lower jaw
83. Reptiles
Homodont & polyphyodont
Tend to be tricuspid or cone shaped
Egg teeth – in embryos of lizards & snakes
- used to break the shell
84. Dentition of mammals
Heterodont ( 4 types )
Restricted to 2 rows
Ability to masticate – improves digestive
efficiency for high rate of metabolism
85. Other features
TMJ articulation
Salivary glands
Prismatic enamel
Diphyodonty
Secondary palate
Significant muscle development
86. Dentition of protheria
Spiny ant eater – edentulous
Duck bulled platypus – 3 functional
posterior teeth in each jaw quadrant
A No. additional teeth develop but do not
erupt or resorb
87. Metatheria
An unusual feature – only last premolar
will have a successor
Anteriorly many teeth are present but not
functional
Morphology is same with placental
animals
Dental formula – 3/3, 0/0, 1/1, 4/4
88. Eutheria
Insectivoral
Ex; hedge hog
Molars – primitive trabacular form with
sharp, high cusps which interdigitate with
those of the opposite jaw
Suitable for crushing the shells of insects
92. Anthropoidea
Macaca monkey
DF – 2/2, 1/1, 2/2, 3/3
Canines are long & prominent ( esp. in male )
Lateral diastema
93. Differences between apes & man
Apes man
‘U’ shaped arches parabolic
Edge to edge overlap of upper &
incisor relation lower incisors
Male canines are no sexual dimorphism
large
Lateral diastema no lateral diastema
Pointed cusps rounded cusps
94. ANTHROPOSCOPY
Anthropos – human
Skopein - examine
Judging the body by inspection
Cannot be expressed numerically
Head must be in the rest position – the
relationship of paired features will be
assessed
95. Criteria for judgment
examiner’s esthetic perception &
experience
Paired features are judged for level,
contour & size
102. ANTHROPOMETRY
“It is a systematised art of measuring and
taking observations of man, his skeleton,
his brain or other organs, by the most
reliable means and methods for scientific
purposes”
-ALES HRDLICKA
103. Anthropos -human &
metron -measure
Anthropometry represents the typical and
traditional tool of physical anthropology
Johann Friedrich Blumenbach (1752-1840)
3 types of head form
1. Square
2. Long
3. Laterally compressed
104. Broca, Flower, Turner further developed the study
of the skulls on the foundations laid by
Blumenbach
Father of Anthropometry – BROCA
Broca’s methods were universal until 1870
In 1874, Ihering pointed out the weaknesses in
Broca’s method
craniometric conferences were held at
Munich(1877) and Berlin(1880)
105. Kollmann, Ranke, and Virchow prepared a
scheme for craniometric techniques.
This was presented and approved at the 13th
general congress of the German
Anthropological Society held at Frankfurt
(1882)
106. SUBDIVISIONS OF ANTHROPOMETRY
SOMATOMETRY -Living body including
head and face
Osteometry -Skeletal long and short
bones
Craniometry -Skull
Physiometry -Bodily & mental
functions
107. MEASURING TOOLS & TECHNIQUES
REQUISITES
1. Should be accurate
2. Not easily distorted
3. Handy or easy to manipulate
4. Easily transportable for field work
108. sliding caliper - it measures
the linear projective distances
between 2 land marks in the
same plane
Ex; eye fissure length,mouth width
The standard instruments
109. 2. Spreading caliper
When the projective linear
distance has to be determined
between distant surfaces and
various planes
Ex; length of the head & width of the head
110. Soft metric tape
Used for determining the tangential linear
distances taken along the skin surface
between 2 land marks
Ex; maxillary & mandibular arcs of the face
111. Large double sliding calipers with levels
–used when measuring projective
distances involving the vertex and the
opisthocranion land marks of the head
112. Measuring tools with
various modifications
Nose deviation
protractor
Nostril inclination
protractor
Nasal root and
alar- slope angle meter
113. Multipurpose
facial angle meter
Pointed portion –measuring
nasofrontal,nasolabial, mentolabial angles
Small & large forked portions – determining the
nasal tip & mentocervical angles
115. Selection of subjects
Selection will be on the basis of
Blood – 1.between individuals of same race
2. Between individuals of different race
Normalcy – pathologic conditions & anomalies
alter the size, shape, & other characters
( rachtis, pagets disease, & clefts )
Age & sex
116. Age –
1. Eruption of teeth
2. Union of epiphysis
3. Condition of teeth
4. Condition of cranial structures - sutures
5. General condition of the weight of the
bones
117. Positioning the subject
Subjects to be seated in the dental chair
with the head resting on the head support
Head of the examiner must be level with the
head of the subject
Standard orientation of the head –FH plane
Projective measurements
118. FACIAL MID LINE
3 anatomic points
The nasion ( root of the nose )
The subnasale (base of the columella )
The gnathion / menton (lower edge of the
mandible
119. Land marks
‘Certain anatomic points used to take body
measurements’
Short abbreviations used instead of full names
( small letters )
ex; nasion – n
Land marks may have similar name but differ in
location
Ex; porion
To avoid errors – they should be marked on the
skin
120. Head
Vertex – highest
point of the head
Glabella – most
prominent midline
point between eyebrows
Opisthocranion – most posterior point of the
line of greatest head length
Eurion – the most prominent lateral point on
each side of the skull
122. Measurements of head region
HORIZONTAL HEAD POSITION
1. Width of the head
– eu to eu
2. Width of the forehead
- ft to ft
3. Skull base width
- t to t
123. Perpendicular head position
1. Height of the culvarium – v-tr
2. Anterior height of the head
v-n
3. Specific height of the
head – v-en
4. Height of the head &
nose – v to sn
5. Combined height of
the head & face – v to gn
124. Length of the head
g to op
Circumference of
the head
125. Face
Width of the face
zy to zy
Width of the mandible
go to go
126. Height of the upper
profile – tr to prn
Height of the lower
profile – prn to gn
Lower half of the
cranio- facial height – en to gn
128. Height of the mandibular
ramus – go to cdl
Depth of the body
go to gn
129. Depth measurements of the face
1. Tragion-glabellar depth
2. Tragion-nasion depth
3. Tragion-subnasaledepth
4. Tragion-gnathion depth
130. Nose
Nasofrontal angle
Angle between the proximal nasal bridge
contour and the anterior surface of the
forehead below the glabella
131. Nasal tip angle
Angle between columella & nasal bridge
132. Naso labial angle
( septolabial angle
or columella labial angle)
Angle between columella & upper lip skin
133. Lips & mouth
Width of the mouth
( inter commisural
distance )
ch to ch
134. Upper lip height
Sn to sto
Height of the skin
portion of the upper lip
sn to ls
Height of the skin
portion of the lower lip
li to sl
Lower lip height - sto to sl
135. Vermilion height of
the upper lip
ls to sto
Vermilion height of
the lower lip
sto to li
136. Labio mental angle – between skin
surface of the lower lip and the surface
contour of the chin
137. Sources of errors in
anthropometry & anthroposcopy
Commonest sources of error:
Improper identification of landmarks
Inadequate use of measuring equipment
Improper measuring technique
138. anthropometry
Improper identification of land marks:
Soft tissue land marks – easy to locate in a
healthy person’ face & difficult in a deformed
face
Bony land marks – palpation
easy to locate – orbitale
difficult to locate – gonion
In congenitally deformed faces – reference to
adjacent structures
139. Head
Vertex – depends upon the FH plane
Eurion – difficult to locate on irregular surface
Glabella – replaced by a point in the mid axis of
the face at the level of the upper ridge of the
eyebrows
Trichion – difficult to locate in early childhood, &
at the first stages of baldness
140. Face
Zygion – difficult to locate in 1st
& 2nd
brachial
arch syndromes
Gonion – difficult if they are covered with thick
skin & hypo plastic mandible
Pogonion – difficult in receding chin & ‘falso
pogonion protrusion’
Gnathion – markedly receding lower jaw
141. Nose
Nasion – difficult after injuries, noses with
silastic implants, deep naso-frontal angle
Subnasale – at the bottom of the curve of the
curve but difficult to locate in sharp angle
Pronasale – best viewed from profile
difficult in bifid nose with uneven tip
heights
142. Lips & mouth
Stomion – mid point of the labial fissure
dislocated mouth- philtrum
Labrale superious – position varies after surgery of cleft
lip
Chelion – points at right & left commisures of the labial
fissure
difficult in older patients because of a fine
shallow ridge of the skin
repeated inspection
143. Problems with measuring tools
Standard measurements are not used
If they are used improperly
examiner should be familiar with the areas
Accuracy varies with instruments
sliding calipers – accurate
sliding calipers – up to 3mm error
tape –shortens the distance when pressed &
should be tightened to eliminate the effect of the
hair
fabric tape follows the contours of the face
144. Improper measuring technique
POSITION OF THE HEAD – improper measurements
( especially projective measurements )
Head tends to return to the rest position during
examination – must be checked before measurement
50
to 100
of error in inclination
In patients with asymmetric FHs, the difference between
two horizontals must be assessed
Farkas – left FH is closer to the rest position
145. FACIAL MID LINE – border between right & left
halves
Errors can be made in judging the facial
asymmetry
Nasion is the most stable point
The heights will be changed with expressions on
the face ( crying, smiling )
146. Anthroposcopy
Errors result from
1. Incorrect positioning of the patient’s
head
2. Wrong angle of view of the examiner’s
eyes
3. Poor lighting
4. Poor esthetic assessment & talent
147. Head
Visual judgment of the height of the fore head
depends on the
1. Position of the head during inspection
2. Inclination of the fore head
3. Position of the ears
Face
Lower face height would appear small in the
presence of a receding mandible
148. Lips & mouth
Frontal view – size of the upper lip depends
on the naso-labial angle & the position of
the skin surface
Curved nasolabial angle & protruding skin –
short upper lip
Vertical upper lip & obtuse angle – longer lip
151. Anthropometry
in cleft lip & palate patients
Combined orthodontic & surgical
treatment
Poor esthetics and nasal deformity
( displacement of the soft tissue
elements )
Esthetics – no uniform definition
Goals - Balance & harmony
Accepted standards
152. Common technique – visual assessment
based on the rating scale
- subjective & unreliable
Radiographic cephalometry
Photographs
Physical anthropometry – objective
documentation of facial features
- determination of need for surgery
-comparison of facial features before &
after surgery
153. Morphological study of growth patterns of
nasolabial region – Farkas
6 measurements in 1593 north American
Caucasians ( 1 to 18 yrs )
Age 1 – highest growth of the cutaneous portion
of the upper lip & width of the nose
Age 5 – upper lip reaches adult size
Age 14 to 15 – nose is fully developed
154. In craniomaxillo- facial surgery
“Anthropometry is the objective analysis
that replaces subjective judgement”
Mean , standard deviations of key facial
measurements at varied ages
Rate of growth of each facial region
Growth completion of each region
Times of maturation
155. Diagnosis of dysmorphology
Treatment of syndromic patients
In cosmetic surgery
Reconstructive surgery
Ortyhognathic surgery