SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 125
Digital Architecture
Methodology
for
Systemic
Digital Transformation
(Smart Cities are an example)
Digital Architecture Summit
Nov 19-21, 2019, NY, USA
Dr Alexander Samarin
iCMGworld.com
• Digital transformation practitioner, architect and
methodologist
– from a programmer to a systems architect
– have created production systems which work without me
– systems of various sizes: company, corporate, canton, city,
country, continent, community
• Some of my professional roles
– “cleaning person” (usually in an IT department)
– “peacemaker” (between the IT and business)
– “swiss knife” (for solving any problem)
– “patterns detective” (seeing commonalities in “unique” cases)
– “assembler” (making unique things from commodities)
– “barriers breaker” (there is always a bigger system)
– “scribe and futurist” (AS-IS & TO-BE viewpoints)
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 2
About me
• Digital Transformation (DT) is as daunting task because
scope, depth, speed, risks, gains, etc. are scaled up
• Digital systems are fragile thus must be done carefully
• DT is a flow of changes which are
– Disruptive, risky, complex and unpredictable
– Neither for waterfall
– Nor for agile
• Such a flow of changes requires flawless execution
– What is this next change?
– Why to carry out next change?
– How to carry out next change?
– Who will gain / lose /pay in this next change?
– What will be the changes in the flow of changes?
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 3
Digital Transformation is difficult
X
X
• DT never ends; Forbes called DT “lifestyle”
• 70-80% failure rate (with trillions USD)
• Many good recommendations but no “key thread”
• Current approaches to DT are messy
– New key roles (Chief Data Officer, Chief Digital Officer and Chief
Digital Transformation Officer)
– Existing key roles (CIO, CTO, Enterprise Architect)
– Old unresolved problems (where, when and how create and
deliver value to the customers)
– New challenges (e.g. rapid world-wide competition and
technological pressure, fragility of digital solutions and platforms)
• Everyone understands “digital” and “DT” differently
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 4
Digital Transformation is expensive
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 5
IT community folklore
CDO CDTO
EA
Digital
Transformation
• Context for “digital” Digital as discrete, not analogue,
not physical and not mental
• Meaning of “digital” Related to the presentation of data
by different states or discrete values
• Example – data in digital representation
• Related concepts
– Numbers are the basic concept of mathematics used to quantify,
compare, number objects and parts
– Numerical digits — a sign system to record specific numbers
values
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 6
What is digital – context 1
• Context for “digital” The basics of efficient use of
computers – representing objects
• Meaning of “digital” One of many representations of an
object
– physical, analogue, digital, bionic, etc.
• Digital representation is explicit, formal,
machine-readable and machine-executable
• For example of “machine-executable”:
– Using a 3D printer, you can translate a digital view of an object into
its physical view (i.e., print such an object);
– You can visualize an HTML document on a variety of devices
(including a conventional printer)
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 7
What is digital – context 2
• Because many representations of the same object may
co-exist then the priority is important
• For a nature-made object, its digital representation is
always secondary
• For a man-made object, its digital representation may be
primary
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 8
What is digital – context 2
primary vs secondary
Becoming
digital
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 9
What is digital - context 2
Many representations of a house
House design
(digital) v1
Built house
(physical) v1
Built house
(physical) v2
Built house
(digital)
Time
House design
(digital) v2
Implement Monitor Improve
Model Improve
Control
Alerts
• “Digital twin”
– a digital twin is a digital replica of a living or non-living physical
entity
• “Digital footprint” or “digital shadow”
– one's unique set of traceable digital activities, actions,
contributions and communications manifested on the Internet
• “Digital profile”
– a mixture of previous two
• However, in these cases, the digital representation is
secondary thus it is not used efficiently and DT
cannot bring all its benefits
• Let us consider the digital representation as primary one
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 10
What is digital - context 2
however, digital is considered secondary
• Context for “digital” Systems made primarily from
objects in digital representation
• Meaning of “digital” Systems are fully symbolic and
technical
• This digital representation is primary
• A change in software leads to changes in a system (for
the better or not)
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 11
What is digital – context 3
software-defined “technical” systems
• Digital representation of the traffic (cars, lights, etc.) is
primary
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 12
Example
Intelligent Transportation System
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 13
Example
Software defined network
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 14
Example
Software defined based Smart Grid
• Software Defined Network + Wireless Sensors Network
• SD-WSN is used in water management
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 15
Example
SD-WSN
• Is the most difficult IT system!
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 16
Modern autonomous car
– see https://bpm.com/blogs/executable-architecture-of-software-defined-enterprises
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 17
Software-defined enterprise
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 18
Example of a software-define enterprise
• Smart cities, smart territories & countries, smart
manufacturing enterprises, smart grids, organisations, etc.
• Such systems
– are usually classified as “socio-technical” or “cyber-physical”
– comprise many various interwoven and interlinked “facets”
(economical, intellectual, biological, ethical, real-time systems,
software-intensive, computational, etc.) – similar to human body
– they are not “system of systems” or “system of ecosystems”
• All such “facets” must be mutually aligned to form the
system (consider the human body)
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 19
What’s about sociotechnical systems? (1)
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 20
What’s about sociotechnical systems? (2)
• Why a system? Because only integration is not enough
• SMART CITY: effective integration of physical, digital and
human systems
• Fortunately, for each such facets its digital representation
(primary or secondary) can be built
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 21
What’s about sociotechnical systems? (3)
DIGITAL
PHYSICALHUMAN
• Context for “digital” Dealing with multi-facet systems
• Meaning of “digital” Systems are partially symbolic
(based on the “double mirror” approach)
• Mr Orit Halpern: “computationally and digitally managed
systems”
– However, the whole life cycle must be emphasised
• Digitally coordinated system – system which is
architected, governed, managed and operated based on
the digital presentation of its elements, features and
relationships between them
• Short name “Digital System”; full name “Digitally
Coordinated Repeatable System”
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 22
What is digital – context 4
digitally coordinated “socio-tech” systems
• There is a strong demand for sustainable future
– The Club of Rome
– Sustainable Development Goals from the UN
– Everything is requested being smart
• Essential requirements for smart cities
– combining diversity and uniformity
– achieving repeatability and scalability (e.g. 4 500+ cities with
150 000+ citizens need to become smart in a sustainable way)
– addressing complexity
• It is a systemic problem which has to be solved by
(re)building existing systems systemically as digitally
coordinated repeatable systems
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 23
Why digitally coordinated systems (1)
• Examples of multi-facet systems to become coordinated
systems
– economy sectors, enterprises, hospitals, universities
– homes, buildings, cities (including town, village, megapolis, etc.)
– territories, countries, unions of countries
– governmental agencies, ministries
• Digital Transformation (DT) of an existing system is
rebuilding it as a digitally coordinated system
• Unofficial definition
– Digital Transformation of any system is a permanent systematic
perestroika this system as a digitally coordinated system
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 24
Why digitally coordinated systems (2)
• Digital economy is an economy built as a digital system
• Digital country is a country built as a digital system
• Digital territory is a territory built as a digital system
• Digital enterprise is an enterprise built as a digital system
• Smart city is a city built as a digital system
• Smart building is a building built as a digital system
• Smart home is a dwelling built as a digital system
• Any digital system has to be “smart” because otherwise the
“digit” will not stand as the slightest mistake is a collapse
that spreads quickly with huge damage - well, as with a
house of cards. If you want to build a “smart” system,
today it must be “digital”. There's no other way yet.
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 25
Some related concepts
1. A digital element is easy repeatable (cloneable); copy
cost is zero
2. A universal (with rich functionality) digital system which
satisfies many customers is very difficult to create
3. A digital system is a coherent set of digital elements
connected in a digital way, since any system consists of
elements and connections between them
(“assembly” pattern)
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 26
Main secret of digital -
easy to create necessary variations (1)
e
d
a
b
c
4. Individual versions of digital systems can be easily
assembled from standard digital repeatable
elements (“Lego” pattern)
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 27
Main secret of digital -
easy to create necessary variations (2)
d
a
c
e
d
a
c
eda b c
5. Unique digital elements (labelled “1” and “2”) can be
quickly added as needed thus allowing the creation of
all sorts of individual versions of a digital system
(“platform” pattern)
6. If these unique digital elements become popular then
they can be included in the platform for wider distribution
(“software factory” pattern)
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 28
Main secret of digital -
easy to create necessary variations (3)
1
2
eda b c
PLATFORM
1
2eda b c
PLATFORM
7. When necessary a platform component can be replaced
by another component (labelled “β”) which follows the
same interfaces (“API” pattern)
• Thus, the most efficient and effective way of DT is
– coordinate and complement creating digital repeatable elements
– use methods for assembling digital repeatable systems from
digital repeatable elements
– reuse (e.g. sell, rent, copy) such elements and systems many
times
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 29
Main secret of digital -
easy to create necessary variations (4)
1
2eda β c
PLATFORM
• A lot of existing elements which constitute and support
such digital repeatable systems must get their digital
representations as well
– rights, currency, shares, laws, contracts, documents, business
processes, horizontal and vertical integration, etc.
• Life cycles of these elements will be (re)built on the
primacy of digital representation of those elements
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 30
Go to digital repeatable systems
• Rights on an asset become digital records and managed
by right owners directly
– rights on ownership, usage, etc.
– changes must be recorded in a third-party digital archive (e.g.
blockchain)
– right on a whole asset or part of it
– assets may be digital as well
– also known as “token”
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 31
Digital representation of supporting things
Rights (1)
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 32
Digital representation of supporting things
Rights (2)
• Advantages of the Token Container Model (from The
Liechtenstein Blockchain-Act) https://cointelegraph.com/news/liechtensteins-parliament-
unanimously-approves-new-blockchain-act
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 33
Digital representation of supporting things
Rights (3)
Non-fungible token
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 34
Digital representation of supporting things
Rights (4)
• National currency gets its digital representation
– Digital Money of National Bank, e.g. digital-euro, to move it
directly from one owner to another; euro and digital-euro are
mutually exchangeable
– Potential implementations
• Only central bank (e.g. Tunisia https://www.chipin.com/digital-
dinar-tunisia-issues-electronic-central-bank-currency-e-dinar )
• China approach is 2 levels: National Bank and commensal
banks
• Peer-to-peer
• Enterprise shares become security tokens
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 35
Digital representation of supporting things
National money and shares
• Contracts become digital contracts https://improving-bpm-
systems.blogspot.com/2016/07/digital-contract-as-process-enables.html
– Activities during the contract preparation phase:
1. Vendor and Buyer: Engage a “digital”
lawyer via a standard digital contract
2. Vendor: Propose contract
3. Lawyer: Validate contract
4. Buyer: Accept contract
5. Escrow: Seal contract
– Activities during the contract execution phase:
6. Buyer: Transfer money to escrow
7. Lawyer: Announce payment to vendor
8. Vendor: Deliver goods
9. Buyer: Announce acceptance of goods
10.Lawyer: Transfer money to vendor
– Activities during the contract closure phase:
11.Lawyer: Close the contract
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 36
Digital representation of supporting things
Contracts
• Laws become digital
– e.g. GDPR
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 37
Digital presentation of supporting things
Laws
• Documents become structured, machine-readable and
machine-processable
• Identification of a person become digital and online
• Business processes become digital processes
• Horizontal and vertical integration is done by inter-
organisational digital processes
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 38
Digital representation of supporting things
Many others (1)
1. Customers
2. Customer’s journey
3. Goods and services
4. Life cycles of goods and services
5. Business models
6. Business processes
7. Business decisions
8. Business partners(or ecosystem)
9. Transactions with partners and customers
10.Technology
11.Information
12.Data
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 39
Digital representation of supporting things
Many others (2)
Magic
of data
as new
oil
• Systemically
– coherent viewpoints, views, descriptive and executable models
• Value-driven
– understand pains and cures
– understand flows of value, their performance and potentials
• Via Human Enterprise Learning Leadership (HELL)
– everyone is an important stakeholder who must learn and act
• Trustworthiness by design
– privacy by design, quality by design, etc.
• With coordination, complementation and copying
– to address next uber-complex challenges with limited talent resources
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 40
How to transform a system to the digital one
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 41
Smart City makes the world better for
citizens, society, business and government
• Primary beneficiary (citizens and society) - Significant
improvement in living standards; the rapid and effective creation of a
wide range of goods and services based on Digital Economy
• Secondary beneficiary (business) - Ease of doing business (EoDB),
creating new sectors of the economy and entering new markets
• Tertiary beneficiary (government) - Systematic and manageable
implementation of a complex transformation of a city; increasing
predictability and reducing risks associated with a complex
transformation of a city
• One of the Sustainable Development Goals
• 4 500+ cities (with 150 000+ citizens) to become
smart (thus sustainable) in a sustainable way
– i.e. by transforming cities into digital repeatable systems
• Unpredictable and unlimited growth and development
• Each city is different
• All cities have some commonalities
• Digital data and information in huge volumes
• Contradictory demands for security and privacy
• Many diverse stakeholders
• Distributed and decentralised
• Great influence on our society
• Multidisciplinary
• City is a system of various (social, economic, technical,
physical, intellectual, biological, and its mixtures)
interwoven and interdependent systems
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 42
Smart City complexity
To implement many similar systems –
use pattern “4 Levels of architecting”
2.Reference
architecture
1.Reference
model
4. Implementation
A2
3. Solution
architecture B
3.Solution
architecture A
4. Implementation
A1
build and test
refine
design and engineer
architect
extract essentials
refine
refine
design and engineer
Problem space Solution space
General needs
- stakeholders
- quality
- system
- domain
architect
extract
align
Reference Architecture is a
template for many Solution
Architectures
City A specific needs
- stakeholders
- quality
City B specific needs
- stakeholders
- quality
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 43
Pattern “Reference Architecture”:
a common need for a sustainable solution
Common parts
Unique parts
A A B B T T
Citizens
Society
Business
Government
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 44
Citizens
Society
Business
Government
Citizens
Society
Business
Government
Let us
1) Build common understanding
2) Isolate common parts
3) Find how to integrate unique and common parts
4) Develop common parts once and with high quality as a platform
5) Have a version of the common platform at each Smart City
6) Cooperate, complement and copy among Smart Cities
Together Smart Cities will gain a lot in quality, time and money
Architecting DT for Smart Cities:
a common understanding of common parts
A A B B T T
Common parts
Unique parts
Standards Development
Organizations (IEC, ISO, ITU,
JTC1, IEEE, …)
Industries
Academic and
research
institutes
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 45
IEC SyC Smart Cities WG3
Smart Cities Reference
Architecture (SCRA)
and Smart Cities
Reference Architecture
Methodology (SCRAM)
IEC/TC …
IEC/SyC
ISO/PC
ISO/TC JTC1
Citizens
Society
Business
Government
Citizens
Society
Business
Government
Citizens
Society
Business
Government
Best practices
Best knowledge
Best standards
SCRAM & SCRA
1) all digital solutions are repeatable
2) each city may add its own solutions
under the common methodology, i.e. SCRAM
Architecting DT for Smart Cities:
repeatable solutions for common parts
Common Smart Cities
digital repeatable platform
S2 …S1
S3
A
2
Telecommunication
providers
Industries
Academic and
research institutes
Financial organisations
IT companies (start-
ups, local, global)
City A
digital repeatable platform
S1
S3
City B
digital repeatable platform
S2B1 B3
City T
digital repeatable platform
T1
T3
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 46
Common parts
Unique parts
Coordination, complementating and copying of digital
repeatable solutions and systems
SCRA and SCRAM
IEC/TC …
IEC/SyC ISO/PC
ISO/TC JTC1
Standards Development Organizations
(IEC, ISO, ITU, JTC1, IEEE, …)
IEC SyC Smart Cities WG3
Citizens
Society
Business
Government
Citizens
Society
Business
Government
Citizens
Society
Business
Government
Primary market:
City digital transformation
Secondary market:
Platform implementation
Secondary market:
Platform implementation
Primary market:
City digital transformation
Architecting DT for Smart Cities:
investment opportunities
Common Smart Cities
digital repeatable platform
S2 …S1
S3
A
2
City A
digital repeatable platform
S1
S3
City B
digital repeatable platform
S2B1 B3
City T
digital repeatable platform
T1
T3
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 47
Common parts
Unique parts
Coordination, complementating and copying of digital
repeatable solutions and systems
SCRA and SCRAM
IEC/TC …
IEC/SyC ISO/PC
ISO/TC JTC1
Citizens
Society
Business
Government
Citizens
Society
Business
Government
Citizens
Society
Business
Government
Institutional
investors
Ordinary
investors and
crowdfunding
Smart Cities FUND
10%
yield
First comers advantage
Platforms acts
an amplifier for
4 500+ cities
City
infrastructure
insurance
companies
Eliminate
negative yield of
several trillion
USD market
Estimations are provided (mid
2019) by company Relex
(www.relex.io) which is
specialised in real estate
crowdfunding
• Many disciplines to be used together
• The whole system life cycle
– conception, development, production, utilization,
support, retirement and destruction
• There is no one single framework
which covers all of these phases
• However, there are many frameworks
which are “monolith” (also known as “silos”)
– ZF, TOGAF, PEAF, POET, FEAF, DoDAF, MoDAF, NAF, RM-ODP,
JTC1/SC7 software engineering standards, CoBIT, ITSM (ITIL), ISO
20000, ISO 27000, ISO 9000, BIZBok, BABok, BPMBoK, PMBok and
many other “disciplines” such as DevOps, Agile, SCRUM, etc.
• Smart Cities Reference Architecture Methodology (SCRAM)
• Smart Cities Reference Architecture (SCRA)
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 48
How to describe such architecture?
Geometrical views of buildings are viewed side by
side — as a composition
ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011
architecture description
Views (system-in-focus dependent) are governed by
viewpoints (system-in-focus independent)
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 49
Each view comprises one or many models. Any model consists of artefacts (e.g.
applications, servers, products, reports, etc.) and relationships between them.
Models (system-in-focus dependent) are governed by model-kinds (system-in-focus
independent).
Architecture views are often originated by different
people — thus they must be aligned to be used together
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 50
All frameworks comprise many model-
kinds
• The SCRAM did the following
1. Decomposed pertinent “monolith” frameworks into smaller pieces
2. Sorted those pieces out
3. Structured those pieces
• SCRAM viewpoints
• SCRAM model-types (or model-kinds)
• SCRAM artefact-types
• SCRAM patterns
• SCRAM viewpoints are containers for SCRAM model-types
• SCRAM model-types link SCRAM model-types and/or
SCRAM artefacts-types
• SCRAM patterns are methods to create an SCRAM model-
type from other SCRAM model-types
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 51
SCRAM: Collection of digital viewpoints,
model-types, artefacts-types and patterns
• SCRA models and SCRA artefacts are parts of a system-
of-interest and its architecture description (because they
are digital)
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 52
SCRAM: methodology reference model
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 53
SCRAM/SCRA: Some models may be generated
from others
View A
Model 1
Model 2
Common techniques,
patterns, guesses, magic, full
traceability, automation, etc.
View B
Model 3
EA gold
mine
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 54
Example: from functions to org. units (1)
• Business concern: How to structure a business unit
• Logic
– Collect functions
– Draw a matrix of mutual relationships between those functions
– The relationships may be like “synergy”
– The relationship may be like “prohibition”, e.g. SoD
– Find clusters in the matrix
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 55
Example: from functions to org. units (2)
Pattern Structure IT Organisation (SITO)
• Prohibition rules
– P1 Separate doing and supervising/controlling – SoD
– P2 Separate architecture/design and implementation – SoD,
specialisation and quality at entry
– P3 Separate implementation and operation – SoD, specialisation
and quality at entry
– P4 Policy vs applying it – legislation vs executive separation
– P5 Specialisation
• Synergy rules
– S1 Close work
– S2 Architecture role to guide
– S3 Synergy between technical and administrative activities
(how you do something may be more important what you do)
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 56
Example: from functions to org. units (3)
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 57
Example: from functions to org. units (4)
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 58
Example: from functions to org. units (5)
• Business concern
– dealing with the project portfolio during evolution of the strategy:
intended, emerging and realised
• Logic
– explicitly linking strategic objectives, initiatives, business
capabilities, IT capabilities, IT tools and projects
– add priorities
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 59
Pattern: Strategy To Executable Portfolio
(STEP)
Business
initiatives
(business-specific
demand)
Business
capabilities
(business-
generic
demand)
IT
capabilities
(IT-generic
supply)
Roadmap
programmes
(from AS-IS
to TO-BE)
Business demand IT supply
Business
strategic
objectives
Governance
Maturity improvementRequested maturityBusiness priority
1
2
3
2
2->5
2->4
1->3
1->4
2->4
1->3
2->5
2->4
3->4
4
4
5
3
1
2
3
4
4
1
1
2
3
2
2
4
4
5
3
3->4
1->4
3->5
3->4
2->4
IT tools
(IT-specific
supply)
3
Programme priority
5
4
3
4
4
Dynamic relationships between various
artefacts
Manage
business by
processes
Manage
processes BPM suite
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 60
• Implications
– A formal way to discover points of the most leverage
– The decision-making process is explicit and transparent
– A strategy adjustment and validation becomes a routine on-going
activity during its implementation (like functioning of the GPS
navigator)
– Add $$$$$
Implications and example
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 61
• Process
• Classifications
• Assembles
• Tensors
• General schemas
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 62
SCRAM: Complex dependencies
examples
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 63
Natural dependencies of models
Model A Model B
Model u1
Model D Model E
Model u2
Model G
Model A View N … Pattern 1 Pattern 2 …
A model can be in one or many views
Custom models
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 64
SCRAM vs SCRA
SCRAM viewpoints
SCRAM is a set of architecting rules SCRA is an architecture of an idealized city
SCRAM model-types
SCRAM artifact-types
SCRA views
SCRA models
SCRA artifacts
govern
govern
govern
in SCRAM
in SCRA
• VALUE viewpoint
• BIG PICTURE viewpoint
• SYSTEM-SOLUTION ENGINEERING viewpoint
• PLATFORM ENGINEERING viewpoint
• PLATFORM COMPONENT ENGINEERING viewpoint
• SOLUTION ENGINEERING viewpoint
• CROSSCUTTING ASPECTS ENGINEERING viewpoint
• CORPORATE viewpoint
• RISK MANAGEMENT viewpoint
• SOFTWARE FACTORY viewpoint
• STANDARDS viewpoint
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 65
SCRAM: a set of viewpoints (11) and
model-types (107)
TOGAF
DoDAF
BIZBok
BABok
JTC1/SC7
CoBIT
ITSM, ITIL, ISO 20000
ISO 27000
ISO 9000
BPMBoK
PMIBoK
DevOps
Agile
SCRUM
RM-ODP
• There is a “happy path”
• Actually, it will be “pinball” because if something has been
changed that all connected elements must to be validated
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 66
SCRAM: Dependencies between
viewpoints and model-types
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 67
SCRAM: VALUE viewpoint
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 68
SCRAM: BIG PICTURE viewpoint
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 69
SCRAM: SYSTEM-SOLUTION viewpoint
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 70
PLATFORM ENGINEERING viewpoint
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 71
PLATFORM COMPONENT ENGINEERING
viewpoint
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 72
SOLUTION ENGINEERING viewpoint
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 73
CROSSCUTTING ASPECTS ENGINEERING
viewpoint
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 74
CORPORATE viewpoint
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 75
RISK MANAGEMENT viewpoint
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 76
SOFTWARE FACTORY viewpoint
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 77
STANDARDS viewpoint
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 78
And all viewpoints from ZF
(model-types can be in many viewpoints)
Models from
solutions, platform
components and
platforms populate
the cells in ZF
• Stakeholders, their roles and their concerns
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 79
SCRA: VALUE view:
stakeholders’ concerns analysis
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 80
SCRA: SYSTEM-SOLUTION view:
City capabilities
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 81
SCRA: SYSTEM-SOLUTION view:
Platforms nomenclature
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 82
Reference capabilities vs platforms
Citizen
SCRAM: SOLUTION viewpoint:
Linking solution, solution artefacts, platforms
Tools,
APIs,
Patterns
Templates
Instances
Reference application
architecture for solutions
Solution
artefacts
Forms
Information,
documents
Rules
Processes
Roles
Automation
Information,
KPIs, reports,
audit-trails
Events, data
IoT
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 83
• CITY VALUE view
• CITY BIG PICTURE view
• CITY SYSTEM-SOLUTION ENGINEERING view
• CITY.UNIVERSAL PLATFORM ENGINEERING view
• …
• CITY.TRANSPORT VALUE view
• CITY.TRANSPORT BIG PICTURE view
• CITY.TRANSPORT SYSTEM-SOLUTION ENGINEERING
view
• …
• CITY.WATER VALUE view
• CITY.WATER BIG PICTURE view
• CITY.WATER SYSTEM-SOLUTION ENGINEERING view© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 84
The SCRA applies the SCRAM many times
the whole city and each vertical
• CITY VALUE view
• CITY BIG PICTURE view
• CITY SYSTEM-SOLUTION ENGINEERING view
• CITY CROSSCUTTING ASPECTS ENGINEERING
• CITY CORPORATE view
• CITY RISK MANAGEMENT view
• CITY SOFTWARE FACTORY view
• CITY STANDARDS view
• CITY.ABC SOLUTION ENGINEERING view
• …
• CITY.UNIVERSAL PLATFORM ENGINEERING view
• CITY.UNIVERSAL.ZZZ PLATFORM COMPONENT ENGINEERING view
• CITY.UNIVERSAL.YYY PLATFORM COMPONENT ENGINEERING view
• …
• CITY. URBAN PLATFORM ENGINEERING view
• CITY. URBAN PLATFORM ZZ COMPONENT ENGINEERING view
• CITY. URBAN PLATFORM YY COMPONENT ENGINEERING view
• …
• CITY.WATER VALUE view
• CITY.WATER BIG PICTURE view
• CITY.WATER SYSTEM-SOLUTION ENGINEERING view
• CITY.WATER PLATFORM ENGINEERING view
• CITY.WATER.Z1 PLATFORM SOLUTION ENGINEERING view
• …
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 85
SCRA:
Structure (fragment)
• An initial set of types
– event centric
– data-entry centric
– document/content centric
– data and/or information flow centric
– data and/or information visualisation
– IoT-device centric
– mobile centric
– short-running operations (activities-based)
– long-running operations (processes-based)
– any combination
• Each type has its own reference architecture, typical
solution artefacts, tools and techniques
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 86
Platform-enabled agile solutions:
typology of solution architectures
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 87
Platform-enabled agile solutions:
Solution and its microservices
Synchronous
Asynchronous
Check
History
Review
Loan
Check
Client
Approve
Loan
Prepare
Contract
Reject
Loan
Domain
rules
Census
Unit-of-functionality
Service
Platform
Monolith
Assembly
Link
BPM-suite tool
Finance
Microservice
Decisions tool
1
2
3
4
Security-by-design
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 88
The SCRA is a template for Solution
Architectures
Smart Cities Reference Architecture (SCRA) Tailored city Solution Architecture for a particular Smart City
Smart Cities
Implementation
Manual (SCIM)
Smart Cities Reference Architecture Methodology (SCRAM) to enable this
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 89
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 90
From a problem to the solution
?
Problem
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
Architectural and technological governance
Architecture & design
Coherent
ecosystem
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Common platform
!
Solution
Already
available
Already
available
• Many reference architectures are developed by
ISO, IEC, JTC1, IEEE under different methodologies
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 91
What’s about standards?
Active Assisted
Living for people
with disabilities
and the elderly
IoT
Smart Manufacturing
Smart
HomeAAL
Smart Cities
Smart
Energy
Digital Healthcare
BigData & AI…Blockchain
Smart
Building
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 92
Common RA stack
implementation
(e.g. IoT RA for Big
Data, IoT RA for SC)
(e.g. IoT RA
“Implemented
systems” as
solution-
architecture and
implementation)
(e.g. IoT RA, SC RA,
Big Data RA, etc.)
42010
mRA generic-RA
is specialisation of
is specialisation of
is specialisation of
solution-architecture
(no viewpoints, no model-kinds, no views, no models)
(some viewpoints, some model-kinds, some views, some models)
DS-RA
solution-RA
is concretisation of
is concretisation of
DS-RADS-RA
solution-RAsolution-RA solution-architecture
solution-architecture
implementationimplementation
generic-RAgeneric-RA
(e.g. JTC1, EU,
a country, etc.)
is specialisation of
(no viewpoints, no model-kinds, no views, no models)
mRA – Meta RA
DS-RA – Domain Specific RA
Patterns “Levels of architecting”
Common
Reference
Architecture
Stack Implementation A2
Solution
architecture B
Solution
architecture A
Implementation A1
build and test
refine
design and engineer
refine
refine
design and engineer
Problem space Solution space
City A specific needs
- stakeholders
- quality
City B specific needs
- stakeholders
- quality
Reference
Implementation
build and test
refine
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 93
• Other initiatives (see www.samarin.biz)
– FinTeсh
– InvestTech
– HealthTech
– EduTech
– UrbaTech
– ….
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 94
Smart City is only a integral part of the
bigger picture
• Mission statement: see below
• Vision statement: BRAVE NEW WORLD for HUMANS, ASAP
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 95
Mission statement and vision statement
• Geographical scope is recursive
– the whole planet
– continent
– regional group of countries (APEC)
– country
– industry
– enterprise
– territory
– city (as generalisation of town, village, megapolis, etc.)
– building
– home
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 96
Problem space (1)
• Activity scope
– economy
– education
– culture
– healthcare
– social
• Citizens
– Significant improvement in living standards and solving issues
which are important for citizens.
• Society
– The rapid and effective creation of a wide range of goods and
services.
• Business
– Ease of doing business (EoDB), creating new sectors of the
economy and entering new markets. Extensive business
involvement and creating conditions for innovations.
• Government
– Systematic and manageable implementation of a complex
transformation of a region. Increasing predictability and reducing
risks associated with a complex transformation.
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 97
Beneficiaries and their concerns
• Scalability (geography and activity)
• Common elements must be done once, with good quality
and being repeatable
• Each country or city should be able to carry out its DT at
its own pace (step-by-step)
• Use existing knowledge as much as possible
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 98
Solution space constraints
• There is a good example – Development Bank
• Usual services
– knowledge (about sectors and countries)
– experts
– sources of available finance
– coherent ecosystem of partners
– mechanisms for organizing projects
• Let us add services which are specific for digital
– a library of digital repeatable solutions
– bank of ideas for the continuous improvement
– coordination and complementation at scale
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 99
Organisation of an DT body (1)
• Central office vs regional offices (vs country offices)
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 100
Organisation of an DT body (2)
• Mission statement: Help clients to internalize successful
DT
– Knowing that DT is a new life style, the RC4DT is responsible to
help clients to materialize life style into their corporate culture
• Vision statement: 80% of clients internalise successful
DT in 2-3 years
• Reminder: RC4DT is using, extending and improving the
DT4DT
• The historical analogue of the RC4DT are “Machine-Tractor
Stations” (MTS)at the USSR at 1930 years
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 105
Regional Centre for DT (1)
• Essential characteristics
– be able to use and adapt the common methodology and
governance
– be able to architect digital repeatable system for various clients
– be able to conduct development of functioning (but not necessarily
final) digital replicating system
– Operational autonomy of the RC4DT
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 106
Regional Centre for DT (2)
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 112
The DT coordination group is supported
by the RC4DT
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 113
Governance stack
• The RC4DT supports the DT Coordination Group. The
latter is formed from the RC4DT expert team and the local
team; gradually, the first teaches the second.
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 114
The RC4DT and the DT coordination
group
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 115
Various life-cycles during the DT
• One of the essential parts of the DT4DT are DT initiates
(popular reference solutions for some domains)
• Currently, there are several types of initiatives that differ
in their level of uniqueness:
– applied (more unique)
– sectoral
– universal
– system (more general)
• There are natural dependencies between initiatives - so
more unique ones depend on more general ones.
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 116
DT Initiatives (1)
• Each initiative has its own maturity level from 0 (less
complete) to 5 (more complete), as shown below.
– 0 - idea
– 1 - outline
– 2 - reference architecture
– 3 - reference implementation
– 4 - two real implementations
– 5 - optimization on the experience of real implementations
• Less completed initiatives are opportunities for
investing in the DT4DT
• https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T9XoosLWVITMn3VvGlN4V-sVsoWC5aERVKjQF4ffv1Q/edit#heading=h.qt8c1dil0w5q
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 117
DT Initiatives (2)
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 118
DT Roadmap
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Dm_3RZfquOxPIhln9rqtVKkgCdKeJfl7G65yh86_xtw/edit#§
• The Digital Transformation maturity matrix is an
assessment of the speed on the DT roadmap.
• Higher level - higher speed. Adding one level increases
the speed in 2-3 times. Cost is reducing. Quality is
increasing.
• If the speed at maturity level=1 is 1 then the speed at
maturity level=4 is approx. 16. (2.5**3)
• Why the speed of DT is very important?
Because in the digital world the winner takes all.
• The RC4DT provides maturity level=4.
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 119
DT Maturity matrix
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R8RRy2pOvopszFl_8XOshR1ckLowp613okM8rQIy09I/edit#
• EA is able to
– solve very complex problems at the scale of SDG
– establish a common and efficient set of its tools
– organise concurrent work, coordination, complementarity and reuse
(i.e. achieve repeatability)
– produce digital models, make machine-executable enterprises
– define DT, drive DT and adjust DT as necessary
• EA is a versatile tool, good investment, strong
multiplier of investments and a basis for Digital
Architecture Methodology
• EA maps systems into sets of artefacts and models
and tell you what is missing
• Welcome to the wonderful digital world!
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 120
Conclusion
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 121
Is EA useful for Digital Transformation?
• E-mail: alexandre.samarine@gmail.com
• Mobile: +41 76 573 40 61
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 122
Questions?
• Elimination of many existing natural and artificial barriers
– No distance, as the movement of digital objects does not require
aircraft, trucks, wagons and barges.
– The speed of light services that will be available at all times,
everywhere and for everyone.
– No language barriers, because automatic translation will also
translate cultural and social differences.
– Machine-executable laws, rules and contracts that will allow digital
contracts to be concluded quickly, reliably, legally and, practically,
with anyone. Cm. https://egov-tm.blogspot.com/2017/08/blog-
post_5.html
– State barriers?
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 123
Forecast: drivers (1)
• Better security and privacy
– Full traceability of information flows without disrupting personal
"space."
– Digital archives with fully reliable information (thanks to
blockchain technology).
– Providing information security will become an architectural
activity.
– The architecture of digital repeatable systems will become an
applied science.
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 124
Forecast: drivers (2)
• World economy productivity
– Programmable businesses that are digitally configured.
– Idempotency of digital objects (i.e. technically, the digital product
is easily replicated, 1 = 1 + 1), which will lead to the industrial
creation of unique digital solutions from a set of standard and
specific digital components.
– The world will become
• Cheaper
• Faster
• Better
• More legal
• More integrated
• More innovative
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 125
Forecast: drivers (3)
• Electronic document management
• Man will be the sole master of his information
• It will be known where the ears grow at fake news
• The transfer of property rights will be simplified
• Agriculture
• Industry
• Competitors for services and jobs from all over the world
• Health
• Caring for the elderly
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 126
Forecast: changes (1)
• Legislation
• Public administration
• Increased citizen participation in the country
• Finance
• Transition from Digital Economy to Digital Country
• A significant part of the current IT will be an accurate
activity
• Platforms will lose their charm
•
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 127
Forecast: changes (2)
• A lot of humans needs will be removed from
economy
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 128
Forecast: changes (3)
• Change: How you do it is more important than what you do
• Systemically
– coherent viewpoints, views, descriptive and executable models
• Value-driven
– understand flows of value, their performance and potentials
• Via Human Enterprise Learning Leadership (HELL)
– everyone is an important stakeholder who must learn and act
• Trustworthiness by design
– privacy by design
• With coordination, complementation and copying
– to address next uber-complex challenges with limited resources
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 129
How to transform your system to a
digital repeatable system
• https://egov-tm.blogspot.com/2018/12/blog-post.html
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 130
Example: 100 India Smart Cities
• Digital space is a collection of interacting digital systems
that interact with them with other actors that provide
their systems and infrastructure
• Digital environment <of a digital system> is many
systems that are not part of this digital system, but with
which this digital system can interact
• Digital ecosystem is an ecosystem made up of digital
systems
• Digital security is the security of a digital system
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 131
More related concepts (1)
• Digital industry is an industry built as an ecosystem of
digital enterprises and systems
• Digital infrastructure <of a digital system> is a
infrastructure of the digital system
• Digital platform is a coherent set of digital services for a
particular purpose
• Digital sector of the economy is the production of
technical and software products and services in a digital
representation
– Examples: software, digital content.
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 132
More related concepts (2)
• Never ever argue about a concept in isolation
– always consider context
– employ your concept system
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 133
REMEMBER
• E-mail: alexandre.samarine@gmail.com
• Mobile: +41 76 573 40 61
© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 134
Questions?

More Related Content

What's hot

Towards A 4D Digital Smart City
Towards A 4D Digital Smart CityTowards A 4D Digital Smart City
Towards A 4D Digital Smart CityDavid Burden
 
Hatii seminar 2014 - The emerging needs and the long standing issues curating...
Hatii seminar 2014 - The emerging needs and the long standing issues curating...Hatii seminar 2014 - The emerging needs and the long standing issues curating...
Hatii seminar 2014 - The emerging needs and the long standing issues curating...Ruggero Lancia
 
Safe Dig Packs improving utility safety #COMIT2016
Safe Dig Packs improving utility safety #COMIT2016Safe Dig Packs improving utility safety #COMIT2016
Safe Dig Packs improving utility safety #COMIT2016Comit Projects Ltd
 
July 2015 Construct15_Richard Morwood_V4 (2)
July 2015 Construct15_Richard Morwood_V4 (2)July 2015 Construct15_Richard Morwood_V4 (2)
July 2015 Construct15_Richard Morwood_V4 (2)Richard Morwood
 
Digital construction for integrated project delivery
Digital construction for integrated project deliveryDigital construction for integrated project delivery
Digital construction for integrated project deliveryStephen Au
 
From email to BIM: 20 years of construction collaboration technologies
From email to BIM: 20 years of construction collaboration technologiesFrom email to BIM: 20 years of construction collaboration technologies
From email to BIM: 20 years of construction collaboration technologiespwcom.co.uk Ltd
 
6th International civil engineering congress _KISHWAR_NAZ
6th International civil engineering congress _KISHWAR_NAZ6th International civil engineering congress _KISHWAR_NAZ
6th International civil engineering congress _KISHWAR_NAZKish Naz
 
5 things about BIM you did not know
5 things about BIM you did not know5 things about BIM you did not know
5 things about BIM you did not knowLéon Berlo
 
Building information modelling
Building information modellingBuilding information modelling
Building information modellingKiran Birdi
 
The Road to Level 3 #COMIT2017
The Road to Level 3 #COMIT2017The Road to Level 3 #COMIT2017
The Road to Level 3 #COMIT2017Comit Projects Ltd
 
H2O for the Future #COMIT2017
H2O for the Future #COMIT2017H2O for the Future #COMIT2017
H2O for the Future #COMIT2017Comit Projects Ltd
 
DRCOG Keynote on GIS, BIM, CAD Convergence and 3D Cities
DRCOG Keynote on GIS, BIM, CAD Convergence and 3D CitiesDRCOG Keynote on GIS, BIM, CAD Convergence and 3D Cities
DRCOG Keynote on GIS, BIM, CAD Convergence and 3D CitiesMatt Ball
 
Building information modeling (bim)
Building information modeling (bim)Building information modeling (bim)
Building information modeling (bim)nachomachi1
 
MOSAIC BIM- Innovative Design & Construction Solutions
MOSAIC BIM- Innovative Design & Construction SolutionsMOSAIC BIM- Innovative Design & Construction Solutions
MOSAIC BIM- Innovative Design & Construction Solutionscloudfusion
 
Key Note - The Digital Evolution of the Construction Industry #COMIT2017
Key Note - The Digital Evolution of the Construction Industry #COMIT2017Key Note - The Digital Evolution of the Construction Industry #COMIT2017
Key Note - The Digital Evolution of the Construction Industry #COMIT2017Comit Projects Ltd
 
CD March 2015 - Bentley presentation about current BIM thinking
CD March 2015 - Bentley presentation about current BIM thinkingCD March 2015 - Bentley presentation about current BIM thinking
CD March 2015 - Bentley presentation about current BIM thinkingComit Projects Ltd
 
Ethioplugin eiabc_autodesk_ayele_bedada_2014
Ethioplugin eiabc_autodesk_ayele_bedada_2014Ethioplugin eiabc_autodesk_ayele_bedada_2014
Ethioplugin eiabc_autodesk_ayele_bedada_2014Ayele Bedada
 
CH2M BIM Heriott Watts University
CH2M BIM Heriott Watts UniversityCH2M BIM Heriott Watts University
CH2M BIM Heriott Watts UniversityMladen Petrović
 

What's hot (20)

Towards A 4D Digital Smart City
Towards A 4D Digital Smart CityTowards A 4D Digital Smart City
Towards A 4D Digital Smart City
 
Hatii seminar 2014 - The emerging needs and the long standing issues curating...
Hatii seminar 2014 - The emerging needs and the long standing issues curating...Hatii seminar 2014 - The emerging needs and the long standing issues curating...
Hatii seminar 2014 - The emerging needs and the long standing issues curating...
 
From Smart Building to Smart City Mr. Henry Yu, CEO, Kalloc Studios Asia Limited
From Smart Building to Smart City Mr. Henry Yu, CEO, Kalloc Studios Asia LimitedFrom Smart Building to Smart City Mr. Henry Yu, CEO, Kalloc Studios Asia Limited
From Smart Building to Smart City Mr. Henry Yu, CEO, Kalloc Studios Asia Limited
 
Safe Dig Packs improving utility safety #COMIT2016
Safe Dig Packs improving utility safety #COMIT2016Safe Dig Packs improving utility safety #COMIT2016
Safe Dig Packs improving utility safety #COMIT2016
 
July 2015 Construct15_Richard Morwood_V4 (2)
July 2015 Construct15_Richard Morwood_V4 (2)July 2015 Construct15_Richard Morwood_V4 (2)
July 2015 Construct15_Richard Morwood_V4 (2)
 
Digital construction for integrated project delivery
Digital construction for integrated project deliveryDigital construction for integrated project delivery
Digital construction for integrated project delivery
 
From email to BIM: 20 years of construction collaboration technologies
From email to BIM: 20 years of construction collaboration technologiesFrom email to BIM: 20 years of construction collaboration technologies
From email to BIM: 20 years of construction collaboration technologies
 
BIM comp
BIM compBIM comp
BIM comp
 
6th International civil engineering congress _KISHWAR_NAZ
6th International civil engineering congress _KISHWAR_NAZ6th International civil engineering congress _KISHWAR_NAZ
6th International civil engineering congress _KISHWAR_NAZ
 
5 things about BIM you did not know
5 things about BIM you did not know5 things about BIM you did not know
5 things about BIM you did not know
 
Building information modelling
Building information modellingBuilding information modelling
Building information modelling
 
The Road to Level 3 #COMIT2017
The Road to Level 3 #COMIT2017The Road to Level 3 #COMIT2017
The Road to Level 3 #COMIT2017
 
H2O for the Future #COMIT2017
H2O for the Future #COMIT2017H2O for the Future #COMIT2017
H2O for the Future #COMIT2017
 
DRCOG Keynote on GIS, BIM, CAD Convergence and 3D Cities
DRCOG Keynote on GIS, BIM, CAD Convergence and 3D CitiesDRCOG Keynote on GIS, BIM, CAD Convergence and 3D Cities
DRCOG Keynote on GIS, BIM, CAD Convergence and 3D Cities
 
Building information modeling (bim)
Building information modeling (bim)Building information modeling (bim)
Building information modeling (bim)
 
MOSAIC BIM- Innovative Design & Construction Solutions
MOSAIC BIM- Innovative Design & Construction SolutionsMOSAIC BIM- Innovative Design & Construction Solutions
MOSAIC BIM- Innovative Design & Construction Solutions
 
Key Note - The Digital Evolution of the Construction Industry #COMIT2017
Key Note - The Digital Evolution of the Construction Industry #COMIT2017Key Note - The Digital Evolution of the Construction Industry #COMIT2017
Key Note - The Digital Evolution of the Construction Industry #COMIT2017
 
CD March 2015 - Bentley presentation about current BIM thinking
CD March 2015 - Bentley presentation about current BIM thinkingCD March 2015 - Bentley presentation about current BIM thinking
CD March 2015 - Bentley presentation about current BIM thinking
 
Ethioplugin eiabc_autodesk_ayele_bedada_2014
Ethioplugin eiabc_autodesk_ayele_bedada_2014Ethioplugin eiabc_autodesk_ayele_bedada_2014
Ethioplugin eiabc_autodesk_ayele_bedada_2014
 
CH2M BIM Heriott Watts University
CH2M BIM Heriott Watts UniversityCH2M BIM Heriott Watts University
CH2M BIM Heriott Watts University
 

Similar to Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation (Smart Cities are an example)

Smart-city implementation reference model
Smart-city implementation reference modelSmart-city implementation reference model
Smart-city implementation reference modelAlexander SAMARIN
 
Living plan it sa for urban land institute (2012 02-01-v01)
Living plan it sa for urban land institute (2012 02-01-v01)Living plan it sa for urban land institute (2012 02-01-v01)
Living plan it sa for urban land institute (2012 02-01-v01)~Eric Principe
 
Deloitte CitySynergy whitepaper
Deloitte CitySynergy whitepaperDeloitte CitySynergy whitepaper
Deloitte CitySynergy whitepaperRoger Jeffrey
 
Mini-course at VFU - Architecting modern digital systems - 1
Mini-course at VFU - Architecting modern digital systems - 1Mini-course at VFU - Architecting modern digital systems - 1
Mini-course at VFU - Architecting modern digital systems - 1Alexander SAMARIN
 
Smart cities, big data & their consequences
Smart cities, big data & their consequencesSmart cities, big data & their consequences
Smart cities, big data & their consequencesrobkitchin
 
Smart city.pptx
Smart city.pptxSmart city.pptx
Smart city.pptxnehaa9579
 
Big Data in a Digital City. Key Insights from the Smart City Case Study
Big Data in a Digital City. Key Insights from the Smart City Case StudyBig Data in a Digital City. Key Insights from the Smart City Case Study
Big Data in a Digital City. Key Insights from the Smart City Case StudyBYTE Project
 
Smart cities - More questions than answers
Smart cities - More questions than answersSmart cities - More questions than answers
Smart cities - More questions than answersAlejandro Morán Marco
 
How disruptive technologies are reshaping the future of cities
How disruptive technologies are reshaping the future of citiesHow disruptive technologies are reshaping the future of cities
How disruptive technologies are reshaping the future of citiesSaeed Al Dhaheri
 
How to Make Smart Cities a Reality Today: Five Factors for Success
How to Make Smart Cities a Reality Today: Five Factors for SuccessHow to Make Smart Cities a Reality Today: Five Factors for Success
How to Make Smart Cities a Reality Today: Five Factors for SuccessSchneider Electric
 

Similar to Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation (Smart Cities are an example) (20)

Smart-city implementation reference model
Smart-city implementation reference modelSmart-city implementation reference model
Smart-city implementation reference model
 
Living plan it sa for urban land institute (2012 02-01-v01)
Living plan it sa for urban land institute (2012 02-01-v01)Living plan it sa for urban land institute (2012 02-01-v01)
Living plan it sa for urban land institute (2012 02-01-v01)
 
Smart cities presentation
Smart cities presentationSmart cities presentation
Smart cities presentation
 
Dubai sep. 2019 smart cities financing - loay ghazaleh
Dubai sep. 2019   smart cities financing - loay ghazalehDubai sep. 2019   smart cities financing - loay ghazaleh
Dubai sep. 2019 smart cities financing - loay ghazaleh
 
DII p1
DII p1DII p1
DII p1
 
Deloitte CitySynergy whitepaper
Deloitte CitySynergy whitepaperDeloitte CitySynergy whitepaper
Deloitte CitySynergy whitepaper
 
Keynote Smart Cities IDOM 2014 en
Keynote Smart Cities IDOM 2014 enKeynote Smart Cities IDOM 2014 en
Keynote Smart Cities IDOM 2014 en
 
Mini-course at VFU - Architecting modern digital systems - 1
Mini-course at VFU - Architecting modern digital systems - 1Mini-course at VFU - Architecting modern digital systems - 1
Mini-course at VFU - Architecting modern digital systems - 1
 
2017 Industry of Things World USA, San Diego CA
2017 Industry of Things World USA, San Diego CA 2017 Industry of Things World USA, San Diego CA
2017 Industry of Things World USA, San Diego CA
 
Everything is changing in IT
Everything is changing in IT Everything is changing in IT
Everything is changing in IT
 
MESA- Cyber & Smart Cities - Updated
MESA- Cyber & Smart Cities - UpdatedMESA- Cyber & Smart Cities - Updated
MESA- Cyber & Smart Cities - Updated
 
Smart cities, big data & their consequences
Smart cities, big data & their consequencesSmart cities, big data & their consequences
Smart cities, big data & their consequences
 
Smart city-2-nov-2016-sgd
Smart city-2-nov-2016-sgdSmart city-2-nov-2016-sgd
Smart city-2-nov-2016-sgd
 
Smart city.pptx
Smart city.pptxSmart city.pptx
Smart city.pptx
 
Smart Cities & Digital Government
Smart Cities & Digital GovernmentSmart Cities & Digital Government
Smart Cities & Digital Government
 
Big Data in a Digital City. Key Insights from the Smart City Case Study
Big Data in a Digital City. Key Insights from the Smart City Case StudyBig Data in a Digital City. Key Insights from the Smart City Case Study
Big Data in a Digital City. Key Insights from the Smart City Case Study
 
Smart cities - More questions than answers
Smart cities - More questions than answersSmart cities - More questions than answers
Smart cities - More questions than answers
 
How disruptive technologies are reshaping the future of cities
How disruptive technologies are reshaping the future of citiesHow disruptive technologies are reshaping the future of cities
How disruptive technologies are reshaping the future of cities
 
Smart cities
Smart citiesSmart cities
Smart cities
 
How to Make Smart Cities a Reality Today: Five Factors for Success
How to Make Smart Cities a Reality Today: Five Factors for SuccessHow to Make Smart Cities a Reality Today: Five Factors for Success
How to Make Smart Cities a Reality Today: Five Factors for Success
 

More from Alexander SAMARIN

Mini-course at VFU - Architecting modern digital systems - 3
Mini-course at VFU - Architecting modern digital systems - 3Mini-course at VFU - Architecting modern digital systems - 3
Mini-course at VFU - Architecting modern digital systems - 3Alexander SAMARIN
 
Mini-course at VFU - Architecting modern digital systems - 2
Mini-course at VFU - Architecting modern digital systems - 2Mini-course at VFU - Architecting modern digital systems - 2
Mini-course at VFU - Architecting modern digital systems - 2Alexander SAMARIN
 
Systems architecting experience
Systems architecting experienceSystems architecting experience
Systems architecting experienceAlexander SAMARIN
 
Better application architecture with #microservices and #BPM (as APaaS)
Better application architecture with #microservices and #BPM (as APaaS)Better application architecture with #microservices and #BPM (as APaaS)
Better application architecture with #microservices and #BPM (as APaaS)Alexander SAMARIN
 
Enterprise Architecture (#EntArch) as a #systemsapproach applied management d...
Enterprise Architecture (#EntArch) as a #systemsapproach applied management d...Enterprise Architecture (#EntArch) as a #systemsapproach applied management d...
Enterprise Architecture (#EntArch) as a #systemsapproach applied management d...Alexander SAMARIN
 
#bizarch from the #entarch point of view
#bizarch from the #entarch point of view#bizarch from the #entarch point of view
#bizarch from the #entarch point of view Alexander SAMARIN
 
Architecting digital transformation v1
Architecting digital transformation v1Architecting digital transformation v1
Architecting digital transformation v1Alexander SAMARIN
 
Incremental transformation to #digital (explicit and executable) processes
Incremental transformation to #digital (explicit and executable) processes Incremental transformation to #digital (explicit and executable) processes
Incremental transformation to #digital (explicit and executable) processes Alexander SAMARIN
 
Technology-enabled healthcare transformation: concept paper
Technology-enabled healthcare transformation: concept paperTechnology-enabled healthcare transformation: concept paper
Technology-enabled healthcare transformation: concept paperAlexander SAMARIN
 
BPM for SOA+ESB+API and cloud
BPM for SOA+ESB+API and cloud BPM for SOA+ESB+API and cloud
BPM for SOA+ESB+API and cloud Alexander SAMARIN
 
E-government reference model
E-government reference modelE-government reference model
E-government reference modelAlexander SAMARIN
 
Эталонная модель электронного правительства
Эталонная модель электронного правительстваЭталонная модель электронного правительства
Эталонная модель электронного правительстваAlexander SAMARIN
 
Ladder of business process practices
Ladder of business process practicesLadder of business process practices
Ladder of business process practicesAlexander SAMARIN
 
Importance of executable processes and BPMN
Importance of executable processes and BPMNImportance of executable processes and BPMN
Importance of executable processes and BPMNAlexander SAMARIN
 
How EA, BPM, SOA and ECM work together
How EA, BPM, SOA and ECM work togetherHow EA, BPM, SOA and ECM work together
How EA, BPM, SOA and ECM work togetherAlexander SAMARIN
 
Business Architecture Patterns (BPM in Practice conference)
Business Architecture Patterns (BPM in Practice conference)Business Architecture Patterns (BPM in Practice conference)
Business Architecture Patterns (BPM in Practice conference)Alexander SAMARIN
 
BPM for business analysts: modelling procedure
BPM for business analysts: modelling procedureBPM for business analysts: modelling procedure
BPM for business analysts: modelling procedureAlexander SAMARIN
 
Integration via #BPM: become friendly to #cloud
Integration via #BPM: become friendly to #cloudIntegration via #BPM: become friendly to #cloud
Integration via #BPM: become friendly to #cloudAlexander SAMARIN
 

More from Alexander SAMARIN (20)

Mini-course at VFU - Architecting modern digital systems - 3
Mini-course at VFU - Architecting modern digital systems - 3Mini-course at VFU - Architecting modern digital systems - 3
Mini-course at VFU - Architecting modern digital systems - 3
 
Mini-course at VFU - Architecting modern digital systems - 2
Mini-course at VFU - Architecting modern digital systems - 2Mini-course at VFU - Architecting modern digital systems - 2
Mini-course at VFU - Architecting modern digital systems - 2
 
Systems architecting experience
Systems architecting experienceSystems architecting experience
Systems architecting experience
 
Better application architecture with #microservices and #BPM (as APaaS)
Better application architecture with #microservices and #BPM (as APaaS)Better application architecture with #microservices and #BPM (as APaaS)
Better application architecture with #microservices and #BPM (as APaaS)
 
Enterprise Architecture (#EntArch) as a #systemsapproach applied management d...
Enterprise Architecture (#EntArch) as a #systemsapproach applied management d...Enterprise Architecture (#EntArch) as a #systemsapproach applied management d...
Enterprise Architecture (#EntArch) as a #systemsapproach applied management d...
 
#bizarch from the #entarch point of view
#bizarch from the #entarch point of view#bizarch from the #entarch point of view
#bizarch from the #entarch point of view
 
Help #SME becoming #digital
Help #SME becoming #digitalHelp #SME becoming #digital
Help #SME becoming #digital
 
Architecting digital transformation v1
Architecting digital transformation v1Architecting digital transformation v1
Architecting digital transformation v1
 
Incremental transformation to #digital (explicit and executable) processes
Incremental transformation to #digital (explicit and executable) processes Incremental transformation to #digital (explicit and executable) processes
Incremental transformation to #digital (explicit and executable) processes
 
Technology-enabled healthcare transformation: concept paper
Technology-enabled healthcare transformation: concept paperTechnology-enabled healthcare transformation: concept paper
Technology-enabled healthcare transformation: concept paper
 
BPM for SOA+ESB+API and cloud
BPM for SOA+ESB+API and cloud BPM for SOA+ESB+API and cloud
BPM for SOA+ESB+API and cloud
 
E-government reference model
E-government reference modelE-government reference model
E-government reference model
 
Эталонная модель электронного правительства
Эталонная модель электронного правительстваЭталонная модель электронного правительства
Эталонная модель электронного правительства
 
Ladder of business process practices
Ladder of business process practicesLadder of business process practices
Ladder of business process practices
 
Importance of executable processes and BPMN
Importance of executable processes and BPMNImportance of executable processes and BPMN
Importance of executable processes and BPMN
 
How EA, BPM, SOA and ECM work together
How EA, BPM, SOA and ECM work togetherHow EA, BPM, SOA and ECM work together
How EA, BPM, SOA and ECM work together
 
Business Architecture Patterns (BPM in Practice conference)
Business Architecture Patterns (BPM in Practice conference)Business Architecture Patterns (BPM in Practice conference)
Business Architecture Patterns (BPM in Practice conference)
 
E-passport example
E-passport exampleE-passport example
E-passport example
 
BPM for business analysts: modelling procedure
BPM for business analysts: modelling procedureBPM for business analysts: modelling procedure
BPM for business analysts: modelling procedure
 
Integration via #BPM: become friendly to #cloud
Integration via #BPM: become friendly to #cloudIntegration via #BPM: become friendly to #cloud
Integration via #BPM: become friendly to #cloud
 

Recently uploaded

Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed textsHandwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed textsMaria Levchenko
 
Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024The Digital Insurer
 
Maximizing Board Effectiveness 2024 Webinar.pptx
Maximizing Board Effectiveness 2024 Webinar.pptxMaximizing Board Effectiveness 2024 Webinar.pptx
Maximizing Board Effectiveness 2024 Webinar.pptxOnBoard
 
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking MenDelhi Call girls
 
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path MountBreaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path MountPuma Security, LLC
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking MenDelhi Call girls
 
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slideHistor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slidevu2urc
 
CNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of Service
CNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of ServiceCNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of Service
CNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of Servicegiselly40
 
Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...
Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...
Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...HostedbyConfluent
 
Salesforce Community Group Quito, Salesforce 101
Salesforce Community Group Quito, Salesforce 101Salesforce Community Group Quito, Salesforce 101
Salesforce Community Group Quito, Salesforce 101Paola De la Torre
 
🐬 The future of MySQL is Postgres 🐘
🐬  The future of MySQL is Postgres   🐘🐬  The future of MySQL is Postgres   🐘
🐬 The future of MySQL is Postgres 🐘RTylerCroy
 
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdfThe Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdfEnterprise Knowledge
 
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt RobisonData Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt RobisonAnna Loughnan Colquhoun
 
Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...
Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...
Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...Neo4j
 
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...Miguel Araújo
 
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerHow to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerThousandEyes
 
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)Allon Mureinik
 
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organizationScaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organizationRadu Cotescu
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed textsHandwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
 
Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
 
Maximizing Board Effectiveness 2024 Webinar.pptx
Maximizing Board Effectiveness 2024 Webinar.pptxMaximizing Board Effectiveness 2024 Webinar.pptx
Maximizing Board Effectiveness 2024 Webinar.pptx
 
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
 
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
 
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path MountBreaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking Men
 
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slideHistor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
 
CNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of Service
CNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of ServiceCNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of Service
CNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of Service
 
Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...
Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...
Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...
 
Salesforce Community Group Quito, Salesforce 101
Salesforce Community Group Quito, Salesforce 101Salesforce Community Group Quito, Salesforce 101
Salesforce Community Group Quito, Salesforce 101
 
🐬 The future of MySQL is Postgres 🐘
🐬  The future of MySQL is Postgres   🐘🐬  The future of MySQL is Postgres   🐘
🐬 The future of MySQL is Postgres 🐘
 
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdfThe Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
 
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt RobisonData Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
 
Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...
Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...
Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...
 
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
 
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerHow to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
 
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
 
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organizationScaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
 

Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation (Smart Cities are an example)

  • 1. Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation (Smart Cities are an example) Digital Architecture Summit Nov 19-21, 2019, NY, USA Dr Alexander Samarin iCMGworld.com
  • 2. • Digital transformation practitioner, architect and methodologist – from a programmer to a systems architect – have created production systems which work without me – systems of various sizes: company, corporate, canton, city, country, continent, community • Some of my professional roles – “cleaning person” (usually in an IT department) – “peacemaker” (between the IT and business) – “swiss knife” (for solving any problem) – “patterns detective” (seeing commonalities in “unique” cases) – “assembler” (making unique things from commodities) – “barriers breaker” (there is always a bigger system) – “scribe and futurist” (AS-IS & TO-BE viewpoints) © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 2 About me
  • 3. • Digital Transformation (DT) is as daunting task because scope, depth, speed, risks, gains, etc. are scaled up • Digital systems are fragile thus must be done carefully • DT is a flow of changes which are – Disruptive, risky, complex and unpredictable – Neither for waterfall – Nor for agile • Such a flow of changes requires flawless execution – What is this next change? – Why to carry out next change? – How to carry out next change? – Who will gain / lose /pay in this next change? – What will be the changes in the flow of changes? © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 3 Digital Transformation is difficult X X
  • 4. • DT never ends; Forbes called DT “lifestyle” • 70-80% failure rate (with trillions USD) • Many good recommendations but no “key thread” • Current approaches to DT are messy – New key roles (Chief Data Officer, Chief Digital Officer and Chief Digital Transformation Officer) – Existing key roles (CIO, CTO, Enterprise Architect) – Old unresolved problems (where, when and how create and deliver value to the customers) – New challenges (e.g. rapid world-wide competition and technological pressure, fragility of digital solutions and platforms) • Everyone understands “digital” and “DT” differently © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 4 Digital Transformation is expensive
  • 5. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 5 IT community folklore CDO CDTO EA Digital Transformation
  • 6. • Context for “digital” Digital as discrete, not analogue, not physical and not mental • Meaning of “digital” Related to the presentation of data by different states or discrete values • Example – data in digital representation • Related concepts – Numbers are the basic concept of mathematics used to quantify, compare, number objects and parts – Numerical digits — a sign system to record specific numbers values © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 6 What is digital – context 1
  • 7. • Context for “digital” The basics of efficient use of computers – representing objects • Meaning of “digital” One of many representations of an object – physical, analogue, digital, bionic, etc. • Digital representation is explicit, formal, machine-readable and machine-executable • For example of “machine-executable”: – Using a 3D printer, you can translate a digital view of an object into its physical view (i.e., print such an object); – You can visualize an HTML document on a variety of devices (including a conventional printer) © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 7 What is digital – context 2
  • 8. • Because many representations of the same object may co-exist then the priority is important • For a nature-made object, its digital representation is always secondary • For a man-made object, its digital representation may be primary © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 8 What is digital – context 2 primary vs secondary Becoming digital
  • 9. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 9 What is digital - context 2 Many representations of a house House design (digital) v1 Built house (physical) v1 Built house (physical) v2 Built house (digital) Time House design (digital) v2 Implement Monitor Improve Model Improve Control Alerts
  • 10. • “Digital twin” – a digital twin is a digital replica of a living or non-living physical entity • “Digital footprint” or “digital shadow” – one's unique set of traceable digital activities, actions, contributions and communications manifested on the Internet • “Digital profile” – a mixture of previous two • However, in these cases, the digital representation is secondary thus it is not used efficiently and DT cannot bring all its benefits • Let us consider the digital representation as primary one © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 10 What is digital - context 2 however, digital is considered secondary
  • 11. • Context for “digital” Systems made primarily from objects in digital representation • Meaning of “digital” Systems are fully symbolic and technical • This digital representation is primary • A change in software leads to changes in a system (for the better or not) © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 11 What is digital – context 3 software-defined “technical” systems
  • 12. • Digital representation of the traffic (cars, lights, etc.) is primary © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 12 Example Intelligent Transportation System
  • 13. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 13 Example Software defined network
  • 14. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 14 Example Software defined based Smart Grid
  • 15. • Software Defined Network + Wireless Sensors Network • SD-WSN is used in water management © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 15 Example SD-WSN
  • 16. • Is the most difficult IT system! © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 16 Modern autonomous car
  • 17. – see https://bpm.com/blogs/executable-architecture-of-software-defined-enterprises © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 17 Software-defined enterprise
  • 18. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 18 Example of a software-define enterprise
  • 19. • Smart cities, smart territories & countries, smart manufacturing enterprises, smart grids, organisations, etc. • Such systems – are usually classified as “socio-technical” or “cyber-physical” – comprise many various interwoven and interlinked “facets” (economical, intellectual, biological, ethical, real-time systems, software-intensive, computational, etc.) – similar to human body – they are not “system of systems” or “system of ecosystems” • All such “facets” must be mutually aligned to form the system (consider the human body) © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 19 What’s about sociotechnical systems? (1)
  • 20. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 20 What’s about sociotechnical systems? (2)
  • 21. • Why a system? Because only integration is not enough • SMART CITY: effective integration of physical, digital and human systems • Fortunately, for each such facets its digital representation (primary or secondary) can be built © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 21 What’s about sociotechnical systems? (3) DIGITAL PHYSICALHUMAN
  • 22. • Context for “digital” Dealing with multi-facet systems • Meaning of “digital” Systems are partially symbolic (based on the “double mirror” approach) • Mr Orit Halpern: “computationally and digitally managed systems” – However, the whole life cycle must be emphasised • Digitally coordinated system – system which is architected, governed, managed and operated based on the digital presentation of its elements, features and relationships between them • Short name “Digital System”; full name “Digitally Coordinated Repeatable System” © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 22 What is digital – context 4 digitally coordinated “socio-tech” systems
  • 23. • There is a strong demand for sustainable future – The Club of Rome – Sustainable Development Goals from the UN – Everything is requested being smart • Essential requirements for smart cities – combining diversity and uniformity – achieving repeatability and scalability (e.g. 4 500+ cities with 150 000+ citizens need to become smart in a sustainable way) – addressing complexity • It is a systemic problem which has to be solved by (re)building existing systems systemically as digitally coordinated repeatable systems © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 23 Why digitally coordinated systems (1)
  • 24. • Examples of multi-facet systems to become coordinated systems – economy sectors, enterprises, hospitals, universities – homes, buildings, cities (including town, village, megapolis, etc.) – territories, countries, unions of countries – governmental agencies, ministries • Digital Transformation (DT) of an existing system is rebuilding it as a digitally coordinated system • Unofficial definition – Digital Transformation of any system is a permanent systematic perestroika this system as a digitally coordinated system © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 24 Why digitally coordinated systems (2)
  • 25. • Digital economy is an economy built as a digital system • Digital country is a country built as a digital system • Digital territory is a territory built as a digital system • Digital enterprise is an enterprise built as a digital system • Smart city is a city built as a digital system • Smart building is a building built as a digital system • Smart home is a dwelling built as a digital system • Any digital system has to be “smart” because otherwise the “digit” will not stand as the slightest mistake is a collapse that spreads quickly with huge damage - well, as with a house of cards. If you want to build a “smart” system, today it must be “digital”. There's no other way yet. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 25 Some related concepts
  • 26. 1. A digital element is easy repeatable (cloneable); copy cost is zero 2. A universal (with rich functionality) digital system which satisfies many customers is very difficult to create 3. A digital system is a coherent set of digital elements connected in a digital way, since any system consists of elements and connections between them (“assembly” pattern) © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 26 Main secret of digital - easy to create necessary variations (1) e d a b c
  • 27. 4. Individual versions of digital systems can be easily assembled from standard digital repeatable elements (“Lego” pattern) © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 27 Main secret of digital - easy to create necessary variations (2) d a c e d a c eda b c
  • 28. 5. Unique digital elements (labelled “1” and “2”) can be quickly added as needed thus allowing the creation of all sorts of individual versions of a digital system (“platform” pattern) 6. If these unique digital elements become popular then they can be included in the platform for wider distribution (“software factory” pattern) © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 28 Main secret of digital - easy to create necessary variations (3) 1 2 eda b c PLATFORM 1 2eda b c PLATFORM
  • 29. 7. When necessary a platform component can be replaced by another component (labelled “β”) which follows the same interfaces (“API” pattern) • Thus, the most efficient and effective way of DT is – coordinate and complement creating digital repeatable elements – use methods for assembling digital repeatable systems from digital repeatable elements – reuse (e.g. sell, rent, copy) such elements and systems many times © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 29 Main secret of digital - easy to create necessary variations (4) 1 2eda β c PLATFORM
  • 30. • A lot of existing elements which constitute and support such digital repeatable systems must get their digital representations as well – rights, currency, shares, laws, contracts, documents, business processes, horizontal and vertical integration, etc. • Life cycles of these elements will be (re)built on the primacy of digital representation of those elements © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 30 Go to digital repeatable systems
  • 31. • Rights on an asset become digital records and managed by right owners directly – rights on ownership, usage, etc. – changes must be recorded in a third-party digital archive (e.g. blockchain) – right on a whole asset or part of it – assets may be digital as well – also known as “token” © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 31 Digital representation of supporting things Rights (1)
  • 32. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 32 Digital representation of supporting things Rights (2) • Advantages of the Token Container Model (from The Liechtenstein Blockchain-Act) https://cointelegraph.com/news/liechtensteins-parliament- unanimously-approves-new-blockchain-act
  • 33. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 33 Digital representation of supporting things Rights (3) Non-fungible token
  • 34. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 34 Digital representation of supporting things Rights (4)
  • 35. • National currency gets its digital representation – Digital Money of National Bank, e.g. digital-euro, to move it directly from one owner to another; euro and digital-euro are mutually exchangeable – Potential implementations • Only central bank (e.g. Tunisia https://www.chipin.com/digital- dinar-tunisia-issues-electronic-central-bank-currency-e-dinar ) • China approach is 2 levels: National Bank and commensal banks • Peer-to-peer • Enterprise shares become security tokens © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 35 Digital representation of supporting things National money and shares
  • 36. • Contracts become digital contracts https://improving-bpm- systems.blogspot.com/2016/07/digital-contract-as-process-enables.html – Activities during the contract preparation phase: 1. Vendor and Buyer: Engage a “digital” lawyer via a standard digital contract 2. Vendor: Propose contract 3. Lawyer: Validate contract 4. Buyer: Accept contract 5. Escrow: Seal contract – Activities during the contract execution phase: 6. Buyer: Transfer money to escrow 7. Lawyer: Announce payment to vendor 8. Vendor: Deliver goods 9. Buyer: Announce acceptance of goods 10.Lawyer: Transfer money to vendor – Activities during the contract closure phase: 11.Lawyer: Close the contract © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 36 Digital representation of supporting things Contracts
  • 37. • Laws become digital – e.g. GDPR © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 37 Digital presentation of supporting things Laws
  • 38. • Documents become structured, machine-readable and machine-processable • Identification of a person become digital and online • Business processes become digital processes • Horizontal and vertical integration is done by inter- organisational digital processes © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 38 Digital representation of supporting things Many others (1)
  • 39. 1. Customers 2. Customer’s journey 3. Goods and services 4. Life cycles of goods and services 5. Business models 6. Business processes 7. Business decisions 8. Business partners(or ecosystem) 9. Transactions with partners and customers 10.Technology 11.Information 12.Data © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 39 Digital representation of supporting things Many others (2) Magic of data as new oil
  • 40. • Systemically – coherent viewpoints, views, descriptive and executable models • Value-driven – understand pains and cures – understand flows of value, their performance and potentials • Via Human Enterprise Learning Leadership (HELL) – everyone is an important stakeholder who must learn and act • Trustworthiness by design – privacy by design, quality by design, etc. • With coordination, complementation and copying – to address next uber-complex challenges with limited talent resources © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 40 How to transform a system to the digital one
  • 41. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 41 Smart City makes the world better for citizens, society, business and government • Primary beneficiary (citizens and society) - Significant improvement in living standards; the rapid and effective creation of a wide range of goods and services based on Digital Economy • Secondary beneficiary (business) - Ease of doing business (EoDB), creating new sectors of the economy and entering new markets • Tertiary beneficiary (government) - Systematic and manageable implementation of a complex transformation of a city; increasing predictability and reducing risks associated with a complex transformation of a city • One of the Sustainable Development Goals • 4 500+ cities (with 150 000+ citizens) to become smart (thus sustainable) in a sustainable way – i.e. by transforming cities into digital repeatable systems
  • 42. • Unpredictable and unlimited growth and development • Each city is different • All cities have some commonalities • Digital data and information in huge volumes • Contradictory demands for security and privacy • Many diverse stakeholders • Distributed and decentralised • Great influence on our society • Multidisciplinary • City is a system of various (social, economic, technical, physical, intellectual, biological, and its mixtures) interwoven and interdependent systems © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 42 Smart City complexity
  • 43. To implement many similar systems – use pattern “4 Levels of architecting” 2.Reference architecture 1.Reference model 4. Implementation A2 3. Solution architecture B 3.Solution architecture A 4. Implementation A1 build and test refine design and engineer architect extract essentials refine refine design and engineer Problem space Solution space General needs - stakeholders - quality - system - domain architect extract align Reference Architecture is a template for many Solution Architectures City A specific needs - stakeholders - quality City B specific needs - stakeholders - quality © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 43
  • 44. Pattern “Reference Architecture”: a common need for a sustainable solution Common parts Unique parts A A B B T T Citizens Society Business Government © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 44 Citizens Society Business Government Citizens Society Business Government Let us 1) Build common understanding 2) Isolate common parts 3) Find how to integrate unique and common parts 4) Develop common parts once and with high quality as a platform 5) Have a version of the common platform at each Smart City 6) Cooperate, complement and copy among Smart Cities Together Smart Cities will gain a lot in quality, time and money
  • 45. Architecting DT for Smart Cities: a common understanding of common parts A A B B T T Common parts Unique parts Standards Development Organizations (IEC, ISO, ITU, JTC1, IEEE, …) Industries Academic and research institutes © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 45 IEC SyC Smart Cities WG3 Smart Cities Reference Architecture (SCRA) and Smart Cities Reference Architecture Methodology (SCRAM) IEC/TC … IEC/SyC ISO/PC ISO/TC JTC1 Citizens Society Business Government Citizens Society Business Government Citizens Society Business Government Best practices Best knowledge Best standards SCRAM & SCRA 1) all digital solutions are repeatable 2) each city may add its own solutions under the common methodology, i.e. SCRAM
  • 46. Architecting DT for Smart Cities: repeatable solutions for common parts Common Smart Cities digital repeatable platform S2 …S1 S3 A 2 Telecommunication providers Industries Academic and research institutes Financial organisations IT companies (start- ups, local, global) City A digital repeatable platform S1 S3 City B digital repeatable platform S2B1 B3 City T digital repeatable platform T1 T3 © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 46 Common parts Unique parts Coordination, complementating and copying of digital repeatable solutions and systems SCRA and SCRAM IEC/TC … IEC/SyC ISO/PC ISO/TC JTC1 Standards Development Organizations (IEC, ISO, ITU, JTC1, IEEE, …) IEC SyC Smart Cities WG3 Citizens Society Business Government Citizens Society Business Government Citizens Society Business Government Primary market: City digital transformation Secondary market: Platform implementation Secondary market: Platform implementation Primary market: City digital transformation
  • 47. Architecting DT for Smart Cities: investment opportunities Common Smart Cities digital repeatable platform S2 …S1 S3 A 2 City A digital repeatable platform S1 S3 City B digital repeatable platform S2B1 B3 City T digital repeatable platform T1 T3 © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 47 Common parts Unique parts Coordination, complementating and copying of digital repeatable solutions and systems SCRA and SCRAM IEC/TC … IEC/SyC ISO/PC ISO/TC JTC1 Citizens Society Business Government Citizens Society Business Government Citizens Society Business Government Institutional investors Ordinary investors and crowdfunding Smart Cities FUND 10% yield First comers advantage Platforms acts an amplifier for 4 500+ cities City infrastructure insurance companies Eliminate negative yield of several trillion USD market Estimations are provided (mid 2019) by company Relex (www.relex.io) which is specialised in real estate crowdfunding
  • 48. • Many disciplines to be used together • The whole system life cycle – conception, development, production, utilization, support, retirement and destruction • There is no one single framework which covers all of these phases • However, there are many frameworks which are “monolith” (also known as “silos”) – ZF, TOGAF, PEAF, POET, FEAF, DoDAF, MoDAF, NAF, RM-ODP, JTC1/SC7 software engineering standards, CoBIT, ITSM (ITIL), ISO 20000, ISO 27000, ISO 9000, BIZBok, BABok, BPMBoK, PMBok and many other “disciplines” such as DevOps, Agile, SCRUM, etc. • Smart Cities Reference Architecture Methodology (SCRAM) • Smart Cities Reference Architecture (SCRA) © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 48 How to describe such architecture?
  • 49. Geometrical views of buildings are viewed side by side — as a composition ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011 architecture description Views (system-in-focus dependent) are governed by viewpoints (system-in-focus independent) © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 49 Each view comprises one or many models. Any model consists of artefacts (e.g. applications, servers, products, reports, etc.) and relationships between them. Models (system-in-focus dependent) are governed by model-kinds (system-in-focus independent). Architecture views are often originated by different people — thus they must be aligned to be used together
  • 50. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 50 All frameworks comprise many model- kinds
  • 51. • The SCRAM did the following 1. Decomposed pertinent “monolith” frameworks into smaller pieces 2. Sorted those pieces out 3. Structured those pieces • SCRAM viewpoints • SCRAM model-types (or model-kinds) • SCRAM artefact-types • SCRAM patterns • SCRAM viewpoints are containers for SCRAM model-types • SCRAM model-types link SCRAM model-types and/or SCRAM artefacts-types • SCRAM patterns are methods to create an SCRAM model- type from other SCRAM model-types © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 51 SCRAM: Collection of digital viewpoints, model-types, artefacts-types and patterns
  • 52. • SCRA models and SCRA artefacts are parts of a system- of-interest and its architecture description (because they are digital) © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 52 SCRAM: methodology reference model
  • 53. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 53 SCRAM/SCRA: Some models may be generated from others View A Model 1 Model 2 Common techniques, patterns, guesses, magic, full traceability, automation, etc. View B Model 3 EA gold mine
  • 54. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 54 Example: from functions to org. units (1)
  • 55. • Business concern: How to structure a business unit • Logic – Collect functions – Draw a matrix of mutual relationships between those functions – The relationships may be like “synergy” – The relationship may be like “prohibition”, e.g. SoD – Find clusters in the matrix © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 55 Example: from functions to org. units (2) Pattern Structure IT Organisation (SITO)
  • 56. • Prohibition rules – P1 Separate doing and supervising/controlling – SoD – P2 Separate architecture/design and implementation – SoD, specialisation and quality at entry – P3 Separate implementation and operation – SoD, specialisation and quality at entry – P4 Policy vs applying it – legislation vs executive separation – P5 Specialisation • Synergy rules – S1 Close work – S2 Architecture role to guide – S3 Synergy between technical and administrative activities (how you do something may be more important what you do) © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 56 Example: from functions to org. units (3)
  • 57. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 57 Example: from functions to org. units (4)
  • 58. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 58 Example: from functions to org. units (5)
  • 59. • Business concern – dealing with the project portfolio during evolution of the strategy: intended, emerging and realised • Logic – explicitly linking strategic objectives, initiatives, business capabilities, IT capabilities, IT tools and projects – add priorities © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 59 Pattern: Strategy To Executable Portfolio (STEP)
  • 60. Business initiatives (business-specific demand) Business capabilities (business- generic demand) IT capabilities (IT-generic supply) Roadmap programmes (from AS-IS to TO-BE) Business demand IT supply Business strategic objectives Governance Maturity improvementRequested maturityBusiness priority 1 2 3 2 2->5 2->4 1->3 1->4 2->4 1->3 2->5 2->4 3->4 4 4 5 3 1 2 3 4 4 1 1 2 3 2 2 4 4 5 3 3->4 1->4 3->5 3->4 2->4 IT tools (IT-specific supply) 3 Programme priority 5 4 3 4 4 Dynamic relationships between various artefacts Manage business by processes Manage processes BPM suite © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 60
  • 61. • Implications – A formal way to discover points of the most leverage – The decision-making process is explicit and transparent – A strategy adjustment and validation becomes a routine on-going activity during its implementation (like functioning of the GPS navigator) – Add $$$$$ Implications and example © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 61
  • 62. • Process • Classifications • Assembles • Tensors • General schemas © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 62 SCRAM: Complex dependencies examples
  • 63. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 63 Natural dependencies of models Model A Model B Model u1 Model D Model E Model u2 Model G Model A View N … Pattern 1 Pattern 2 … A model can be in one or many views Custom models
  • 64. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 64 SCRAM vs SCRA SCRAM viewpoints SCRAM is a set of architecting rules SCRA is an architecture of an idealized city SCRAM model-types SCRAM artifact-types SCRA views SCRA models SCRA artifacts govern govern govern in SCRAM in SCRA
  • 65. • VALUE viewpoint • BIG PICTURE viewpoint • SYSTEM-SOLUTION ENGINEERING viewpoint • PLATFORM ENGINEERING viewpoint • PLATFORM COMPONENT ENGINEERING viewpoint • SOLUTION ENGINEERING viewpoint • CROSSCUTTING ASPECTS ENGINEERING viewpoint • CORPORATE viewpoint • RISK MANAGEMENT viewpoint • SOFTWARE FACTORY viewpoint • STANDARDS viewpoint © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 65 SCRAM: a set of viewpoints (11) and model-types (107) TOGAF DoDAF BIZBok BABok JTC1/SC7 CoBIT ITSM, ITIL, ISO 20000 ISO 27000 ISO 9000 BPMBoK PMIBoK DevOps Agile SCRUM RM-ODP
  • 66. • There is a “happy path” • Actually, it will be “pinball” because if something has been changed that all connected elements must to be validated © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 66 SCRAM: Dependencies between viewpoints and model-types
  • 67. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 67 SCRAM: VALUE viewpoint
  • 68. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 68 SCRAM: BIG PICTURE viewpoint
  • 69. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 69 SCRAM: SYSTEM-SOLUTION viewpoint
  • 70. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 70 PLATFORM ENGINEERING viewpoint
  • 71. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 71 PLATFORM COMPONENT ENGINEERING viewpoint
  • 72. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 72 SOLUTION ENGINEERING viewpoint
  • 73. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 73 CROSSCUTTING ASPECTS ENGINEERING viewpoint
  • 74. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 74 CORPORATE viewpoint
  • 75. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 75 RISK MANAGEMENT viewpoint
  • 76. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 76 SOFTWARE FACTORY viewpoint
  • 77. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 77 STANDARDS viewpoint
  • 78. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 78 And all viewpoints from ZF (model-types can be in many viewpoints) Models from solutions, platform components and platforms populate the cells in ZF
  • 79. • Stakeholders, their roles and their concerns © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 79 SCRA: VALUE view: stakeholders’ concerns analysis
  • 80. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 80 SCRA: SYSTEM-SOLUTION view: City capabilities
  • 81. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 81 SCRA: SYSTEM-SOLUTION view: Platforms nomenclature
  • 82. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 82 Reference capabilities vs platforms Citizen
  • 83. SCRAM: SOLUTION viewpoint: Linking solution, solution artefacts, platforms Tools, APIs, Patterns Templates Instances Reference application architecture for solutions Solution artefacts Forms Information, documents Rules Processes Roles Automation Information, KPIs, reports, audit-trails Events, data IoT © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 83
  • 84. • CITY VALUE view • CITY BIG PICTURE view • CITY SYSTEM-SOLUTION ENGINEERING view • CITY.UNIVERSAL PLATFORM ENGINEERING view • … • CITY.TRANSPORT VALUE view • CITY.TRANSPORT BIG PICTURE view • CITY.TRANSPORT SYSTEM-SOLUTION ENGINEERING view • … • CITY.WATER VALUE view • CITY.WATER BIG PICTURE view • CITY.WATER SYSTEM-SOLUTION ENGINEERING view© A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 84 The SCRA applies the SCRAM many times the whole city and each vertical
  • 85. • CITY VALUE view • CITY BIG PICTURE view • CITY SYSTEM-SOLUTION ENGINEERING view • CITY CROSSCUTTING ASPECTS ENGINEERING • CITY CORPORATE view • CITY RISK MANAGEMENT view • CITY SOFTWARE FACTORY view • CITY STANDARDS view • CITY.ABC SOLUTION ENGINEERING view • … • CITY.UNIVERSAL PLATFORM ENGINEERING view • CITY.UNIVERSAL.ZZZ PLATFORM COMPONENT ENGINEERING view • CITY.UNIVERSAL.YYY PLATFORM COMPONENT ENGINEERING view • … • CITY. URBAN PLATFORM ENGINEERING view • CITY. URBAN PLATFORM ZZ COMPONENT ENGINEERING view • CITY. URBAN PLATFORM YY COMPONENT ENGINEERING view • … • CITY.WATER VALUE view • CITY.WATER BIG PICTURE view • CITY.WATER SYSTEM-SOLUTION ENGINEERING view • CITY.WATER PLATFORM ENGINEERING view • CITY.WATER.Z1 PLATFORM SOLUTION ENGINEERING view • … © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 85 SCRA: Structure (fragment)
  • 86. • An initial set of types – event centric – data-entry centric – document/content centric – data and/or information flow centric – data and/or information visualisation – IoT-device centric – mobile centric – short-running operations (activities-based) – long-running operations (processes-based) – any combination • Each type has its own reference architecture, typical solution artefacts, tools and techniques © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 86 Platform-enabled agile solutions: typology of solution architectures
  • 87. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 87 Platform-enabled agile solutions: Solution and its microservices Synchronous Asynchronous Check History Review Loan Check Client Approve Loan Prepare Contract Reject Loan Domain rules Census Unit-of-functionality Service Platform Monolith Assembly Link BPM-suite tool Finance Microservice Decisions tool
  • 88. 1 2 3 4 Security-by-design © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 88
  • 89. The SCRA is a template for Solution Architectures Smart Cities Reference Architecture (SCRA) Tailored city Solution Architecture for a particular Smart City Smart Cities Implementation Manual (SCIM) Smart Cities Reference Architecture Methodology (SCRAM) to enable this © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 89
  • 90. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 90 From a problem to the solution ? Problem ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Architectural and technological governance Architecture & design Coherent ecosystem ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Common platform ! Solution Already available Already available
  • 91. • Many reference architectures are developed by ISO, IEC, JTC1, IEEE under different methodologies © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 91 What’s about standards? Active Assisted Living for people with disabilities and the elderly IoT Smart Manufacturing Smart HomeAAL Smart Cities Smart Energy Digital Healthcare BigData & AI…Blockchain Smart Building
  • 92. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 92 Common RA stack implementation (e.g. IoT RA for Big Data, IoT RA for SC) (e.g. IoT RA “Implemented systems” as solution- architecture and implementation) (e.g. IoT RA, SC RA, Big Data RA, etc.) 42010 mRA generic-RA is specialisation of is specialisation of is specialisation of solution-architecture (no viewpoints, no model-kinds, no views, no models) (some viewpoints, some model-kinds, some views, some models) DS-RA solution-RA is concretisation of is concretisation of DS-RADS-RA solution-RAsolution-RA solution-architecture solution-architecture implementationimplementation generic-RAgeneric-RA (e.g. JTC1, EU, a country, etc.) is specialisation of (no viewpoints, no model-kinds, no views, no models) mRA – Meta RA DS-RA – Domain Specific RA
  • 93. Patterns “Levels of architecting” Common Reference Architecture Stack Implementation A2 Solution architecture B Solution architecture A Implementation A1 build and test refine design and engineer refine refine design and engineer Problem space Solution space City A specific needs - stakeholders - quality City B specific needs - stakeholders - quality Reference Implementation build and test refine © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 93
  • 94. • Other initiatives (see www.samarin.biz) – FinTeсh – InvestTech – HealthTech – EduTech – UrbaTech – …. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 94 Smart City is only a integral part of the bigger picture
  • 95. • Mission statement: see below • Vision statement: BRAVE NEW WORLD for HUMANS, ASAP © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 95 Mission statement and vision statement
  • 96. • Geographical scope is recursive – the whole planet – continent – regional group of countries (APEC) – country – industry – enterprise – territory – city (as generalisation of town, village, megapolis, etc.) – building – home © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 96 Problem space (1) • Activity scope – economy – education – culture – healthcare – social
  • 97. • Citizens – Significant improvement in living standards and solving issues which are important for citizens. • Society – The rapid and effective creation of a wide range of goods and services. • Business – Ease of doing business (EoDB), creating new sectors of the economy and entering new markets. Extensive business involvement and creating conditions for innovations. • Government – Systematic and manageable implementation of a complex transformation of a region. Increasing predictability and reducing risks associated with a complex transformation. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 97 Beneficiaries and their concerns
  • 98. • Scalability (geography and activity) • Common elements must be done once, with good quality and being repeatable • Each country or city should be able to carry out its DT at its own pace (step-by-step) • Use existing knowledge as much as possible © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 98 Solution space constraints
  • 99. • There is a good example – Development Bank • Usual services – knowledge (about sectors and countries) – experts – sources of available finance – coherent ecosystem of partners – mechanisms for organizing projects • Let us add services which are specific for digital – a library of digital repeatable solutions – bank of ideas for the continuous improvement – coordination and complementation at scale © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 99 Organisation of an DT body (1)
  • 100. • Central office vs regional offices (vs country offices) © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 100 Organisation of an DT body (2)
  • 101. • Mission statement: Help clients to internalize successful DT – Knowing that DT is a new life style, the RC4DT is responsible to help clients to materialize life style into their corporate culture • Vision statement: 80% of clients internalise successful DT in 2-3 years • Reminder: RC4DT is using, extending and improving the DT4DT • The historical analogue of the RC4DT are “Machine-Tractor Stations” (MTS)at the USSR at 1930 years © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 105 Regional Centre for DT (1)
  • 102. • Essential characteristics – be able to use and adapt the common methodology and governance – be able to architect digital repeatable system for various clients – be able to conduct development of functioning (but not necessarily final) digital replicating system – Operational autonomy of the RC4DT © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 106 Regional Centre for DT (2)
  • 103. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 112 The DT coordination group is supported by the RC4DT
  • 104. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 113 Governance stack
  • 105. • The RC4DT supports the DT Coordination Group. The latter is formed from the RC4DT expert team and the local team; gradually, the first teaches the second. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 114 The RC4DT and the DT coordination group
  • 106. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 115 Various life-cycles during the DT
  • 107. • One of the essential parts of the DT4DT are DT initiates (popular reference solutions for some domains) • Currently, there are several types of initiatives that differ in their level of uniqueness: – applied (more unique) – sectoral – universal – system (more general) • There are natural dependencies between initiatives - so more unique ones depend on more general ones. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 116 DT Initiatives (1)
  • 108. • Each initiative has its own maturity level from 0 (less complete) to 5 (more complete), as shown below. – 0 - idea – 1 - outline – 2 - reference architecture – 3 - reference implementation – 4 - two real implementations – 5 - optimization on the experience of real implementations • Less completed initiatives are opportunities for investing in the DT4DT • https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T9XoosLWVITMn3VvGlN4V-sVsoWC5aERVKjQF4ffv1Q/edit#heading=h.qt8c1dil0w5q © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 117 DT Initiatives (2)
  • 109. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 118 DT Roadmap https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Dm_3RZfquOxPIhln9rqtVKkgCdKeJfl7G65yh86_xtw/edit#§
  • 110. • The Digital Transformation maturity matrix is an assessment of the speed on the DT roadmap. • Higher level - higher speed. Adding one level increases the speed in 2-3 times. Cost is reducing. Quality is increasing. • If the speed at maturity level=1 is 1 then the speed at maturity level=4 is approx. 16. (2.5**3) • Why the speed of DT is very important? Because in the digital world the winner takes all. • The RC4DT provides maturity level=4. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 119 DT Maturity matrix https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R8RRy2pOvopszFl_8XOshR1ckLowp613okM8rQIy09I/edit#
  • 111. • EA is able to – solve very complex problems at the scale of SDG – establish a common and efficient set of its tools – organise concurrent work, coordination, complementarity and reuse (i.e. achieve repeatability) – produce digital models, make machine-executable enterprises – define DT, drive DT and adjust DT as necessary • EA is a versatile tool, good investment, strong multiplier of investments and a basis for Digital Architecture Methodology • EA maps systems into sets of artefacts and models and tell you what is missing • Welcome to the wonderful digital world! © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 120 Conclusion
  • 112. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 121 Is EA useful for Digital Transformation?
  • 113. • E-mail: alexandre.samarine@gmail.com • Mobile: +41 76 573 40 61 © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 122 Questions?
  • 114. • Elimination of many existing natural and artificial barriers – No distance, as the movement of digital objects does not require aircraft, trucks, wagons and barges. – The speed of light services that will be available at all times, everywhere and for everyone. – No language barriers, because automatic translation will also translate cultural and social differences. – Machine-executable laws, rules and contracts that will allow digital contracts to be concluded quickly, reliably, legally and, practically, with anyone. Cm. https://egov-tm.blogspot.com/2017/08/blog- post_5.html – State barriers? © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 123 Forecast: drivers (1)
  • 115. • Better security and privacy – Full traceability of information flows without disrupting personal "space." – Digital archives with fully reliable information (thanks to blockchain technology). – Providing information security will become an architectural activity. – The architecture of digital repeatable systems will become an applied science. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 124 Forecast: drivers (2)
  • 116. • World economy productivity – Programmable businesses that are digitally configured. – Idempotency of digital objects (i.e. technically, the digital product is easily replicated, 1 = 1 + 1), which will lead to the industrial creation of unique digital solutions from a set of standard and specific digital components. – The world will become • Cheaper • Faster • Better • More legal • More integrated • More innovative © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 125 Forecast: drivers (3)
  • 117. • Electronic document management • Man will be the sole master of his information • It will be known where the ears grow at fake news • The transfer of property rights will be simplified • Agriculture • Industry • Competitors for services and jobs from all over the world • Health • Caring for the elderly © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 126 Forecast: changes (1)
  • 118. • Legislation • Public administration • Increased citizen participation in the country • Finance • Transition from Digital Economy to Digital Country • A significant part of the current IT will be an accurate activity • Platforms will lose their charm • © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 127 Forecast: changes (2)
  • 119. • A lot of humans needs will be removed from economy © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 128 Forecast: changes (3)
  • 120. • Change: How you do it is more important than what you do • Systemically – coherent viewpoints, views, descriptive and executable models • Value-driven – understand flows of value, their performance and potentials • Via Human Enterprise Learning Leadership (HELL) – everyone is an important stakeholder who must learn and act • Trustworthiness by design – privacy by design • With coordination, complementation and copying – to address next uber-complex challenges with limited resources © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 129 How to transform your system to a digital repeatable system
  • 121. • https://egov-tm.blogspot.com/2018/12/blog-post.html © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 130 Example: 100 India Smart Cities
  • 122. • Digital space is a collection of interacting digital systems that interact with them with other actors that provide their systems and infrastructure • Digital environment <of a digital system> is many systems that are not part of this digital system, but with which this digital system can interact • Digital ecosystem is an ecosystem made up of digital systems • Digital security is the security of a digital system © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 131 More related concepts (1)
  • 123. • Digital industry is an industry built as an ecosystem of digital enterprises and systems • Digital infrastructure <of a digital system> is a infrastructure of the digital system • Digital platform is a coherent set of digital services for a particular purpose • Digital sector of the economy is the production of technical and software products and services in a digital representation – Examples: software, digital content. © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 132 More related concepts (2)
  • 124. • Never ever argue about a concept in isolation – always consider context – employ your concept system © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 133 REMEMBER
  • 125. • E-mail: alexandre.samarine@gmail.com • Mobile: +41 76 573 40 61 © A. Samarin 2019 Digital Architecture Methodology for Systemic Digital Transformation 134 Questions?

Editor's Notes

  1. Умный Город делает мир лучше для жителей, общества, бизнеса и правительства Основной бенефициар (граждане и общество) -  Значительное улучшение уровня жизни. Быстрое и эффективное создание широкого спектра товаров и услуг на основе Цифровой Экономики. Вторичный бенефициар (бизнес) - Возможность получения прибыли, БЛАГОДАРЯ упрощению ведения бизнеса (EoDB), созданию новых секторов экономики и выход на новые рынки, широкого вовлечения бизнеса и создание условий для координации, сотрудничества, копирования и инноваций. Третичный бенефициар (правительство) - Систематическая и управляемая реализация сложной трансформации региона. Повышение предсказуемости и снижение рисков, связанных со сложной трансформацией города. Это еще одна из Целей Устойчивого Развития (ЦУР) от ООН
  2. Непредсказуемый и неограниченный рост и развитие Каждый город индивидуален; у всех городов есть общие черты Цифровые данные и информация в огромных объемах Противоречивые требования к безопасности и конфиденциальности Много разных заинтересованных сторон Распределенный и децентрализованный Большое влияние на наше общество Способность взаимодействовать с физическим миром Сочетание социально-технических, кибер-физических, в режиме реального времени, программно-интенсивных и информационных систем 4 500+ городов (более 150 000 жителей), чтобы стать умнее
  3. Надо одновременно учесть (синергия!) уникальность каждого города (unique parts) и наличие общих частей (common parts).
  4. Общие части делаем стандартом для всех (договариваемся в Международных Организация по Стандартизации). Индустрия (практика) и академия (теория) принимают участие в создании лучших стандартов. Рабочая группа 3 системного комитета «Умные Города» МЭК (IEC SyC Smart Cities WG3) суть гарант концептуальной целостности архитектуры. Архитектура гарантирует что 1) все разработки будут тиражируемыми 2) любой город может создать что-то свое для своих нужд по общей методологии.
  5. Будут два рынка: 1) Цифровая трансформация города в цифровую тиражируемую систему 2) Создание Цифрового Инструментария Цифровой Трансформации для Умных Городов
  6. Три типа инвесторов: 1) мелкие инвесторы и народное финансирование - они несут деньги в фонд с 10% доходностью 2) институциональные инвесторы – они могут вложиться в разработку платформы (Цифрового Инструментария Цифровой Трансформации для Умных Городов), который работает как усилитель на 4500+ городов. 3) компании, которые страхуют городскую инфраструктуру и имеют отрицательную доходность, - они могут вложиться в разработку платформы и предлагать клиентам провести Цифровую Трансформацию Инвестиционные оценки получены от компании Relex (www.relex.io), которая специализируется в народном финансировании объектов недвижимости.
  7. model -- discernible representation of something