Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Fiscal Analysis of Stoughton School District Budget


Published on

A project I completed for my master\'s degree- I evaluated the effects of the legislature\'s revenue caps on the Stoughton Area School District\'s ability to provide educational services.

  • ⇒⇒⇒ ⇐⇐⇐ I love this site. It always finds me the best tutors in accordance with my needs. I have been using it since last year. The prices are not expensive compared to other sites. I am glad I discored this site:)
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Be the first to like this

Fiscal Analysis of Stoughton School District Budget

  1. 1. The Looming Fiscal Crisis at the Stoughton Area School District a paper by Sam Wayne
  2. 2. About SASD <ul><li>District has approximately 3,650 students </li></ul><ul><li>Enrollment is declining at about 1% annually </li></ul><ul><li>Per Pupil spending is very low </li></ul><ul><ul><li>87% of state average </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Less than 90% of districts statewide </li></ul></ul><ul><li>High School recently failed to meet Adequate Yearly Progress standards for No Child Left Behind Legislation </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Performance of Disabled subgroup was not adequate </li></ul></ul>
  3. 3. Revenue Limits <ul><li>In 1993, the State Legislature passed Statute 121.90 limiting the rate at which per pupil spending can increase </li></ul><ul><li>Passed in response to statewide call for property tax “relief” </li></ul><ul><li>$241.01 per pupil increase allowed next year </li></ul><ul><li>Districts can override spending limits by passing a referendum </li></ul>
  4. 4. Effects of Revenue Limits on SASD <ul><li>Salaries and Benefits account for 76% of SASD’s 2003-4 budget </li></ul><ul><li>These costs rise annually at average of 5% </li></ul>
  5. 5. Possible Expenditure Reductions <ul><li>Republican Majority in Assembly and Senate wish to pass a Property Tax Freeze or Taxpayers Bill of Rights (TABOR) Amendment in next session </li></ul><ul><li>In 2003, Property Tax Freeze failed to override Gov. Doyle’s veto by 1 vote in Senate </li></ul><ul><li>TABOR was on the agenda this year, but did not garner enough support to come to a vote </li></ul>
  6. 6. General Provisions of Tax Freeze <ul><li>Districts may increase their property tax levy by $100 per pupil each year </li></ul><ul><li>SASD projects that all increases in expenditures will be funded by property taxes </li></ul><ul><li>Likely result- replace $241.01 per pupil increase with $100 per pupil increase </li></ul><ul><li>If state further cuts equalization aid, the district will still be allowed only $100 per pupil increase in property tax levy </li></ul>
  7. 7. Effects of Tax Freeze on SASD <ul><li>Assuming state aid remains constant </li></ul><ul><li>Tax Freeze cuts allowable growth from 2.6% to 1% </li></ul>
  8. 8. Effects of TABOR on Schools <ul><li>School districts may increase their per pupil spending by the previous year’s CPI index (inflation) </li></ul><ul><li>Average inflation 1986-2002 is 2.94% </li></ul><ul><li>Current revenue caps allow per pupil spending to increase by 2.6% </li></ul><ul><li>If TABOR were enacted in 1986, it would have lowered SASD spending in 9 of 18 years between 1986 and 2002 </li></ul>
  9. 9. SASD’s Budget Cut Options <ul><li>Increase class size </li></ul><ul><ul><li>District policy to average 20 students per class </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Most classrooms in district can seat 25 students </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Will cut at most 20% of teachers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Save $3.475 million annually if all cut immediately </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Eliminate non-essentials </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Art, Music, Phys-ed, “Talented and Gifted” program, advanced classes, junior varsity, and varsity sports </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Will cut at most 10% of expenses </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Neither of these, even when combined, will cut enough expenses to avoid eventual need for annual referenda </li></ul>
  10. 10. Need for Ongoing Referenda <ul><li>In order to provide district services at or near current levels, spending referenda will have to pass annually once General Fund is depleted </li></ul><ul><li>To operate at bare-bones capacity, referenda will have to pass annually starting in 2015 </li></ul><ul><li>Superintendent Dr. Myron Palomba says that annual referenda will be necessary to keep the district from shutting down </li></ul>
  11. 11. History of Referenda for SASD <ul><li>The district has passed all four spending referenda it has floated since 1994 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>1994: $28 million </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>1998: $320,000 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>2001: $2.5 million </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>2003: $4.5 million </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Past referenda were all for capital improvements </li></ul><ul><li>District residents were not subject to “bumper-sticker campaigns” </li></ul>
  12. 12. Legitimizing an Ongoing Referenda <ul><li>To avoid a negative fund balance, the district plans on floating a referendum this year </li></ul><ul><ul><li>This is a good way to test public sentiment towards exceeding revenue limits, and allows for a failure before a negative fund balance </li></ul></ul><ul><li>In order to credibly float referenda annually, the district will have to make a few service cuts </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Immediately laying off 4-5 teachers may be necessary </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>In addition, there may have to be a hiring freeze for the next few years as the public gets acclimated to voting on the district budget </li></ul></ul>
  13. 13. Structuring an Ongoing Referenda <ul><li>After proposing referendum this year, use General Fund monies until they expire in 2006-2007 </li></ul><ul><li>Each year referendum should cover all operating costs above imposed restrictions </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Postponing payment by lowering the amount sought only increases funds necessary in the future </li></ul></ul><ul><li>The public should be aware that a referendum will have to pass every year to prevent severe service cuts </li></ul>
  14. 14. Other Recommendations <ul><li>Lobby incoming State Senator Mark Miller and incoming Assemblyman Gary Hebl against a Property Tax Freeze, a TABOR amendment, and the current Revenue Limits </li></ul><ul><ul><li>This will not be very effective, because: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Both men are already against these issues </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Both men are generally powerless, as they are new members in the minority party </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Join with other school districts affected by Revenue Limits to create a lobbying force separate from WEAC </li></ul>